2007-O-18ORDINANCE NO. 2007-0-18
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY Ol' EDGEWATER
AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ORDINANCE
NO. 2003-0-04 AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL
COORDINATION ELEMENT, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
ELEMENT BY AMENDING THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES,
AND POLICIES AND ADDING THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
FACILITIES ELEMENT AND BY PROVIDING
CONSISTENCY WITH THE OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION, HOLDING PUBLIC HEARINGS,
TRANSMITTING THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, THE VOLUSIA GROWTH
MANAGEMENT COMMISSION, VOLUSIA COUNTY, THE
REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, THE ST. JOHNS RIVER
WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, THE DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, THE FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND ANY OTHER
UNIT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT OR GOVERNMENTAL
AGENCY THAT HAS REQUESTED A COPY OF THE PLAN
AMENDMENT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING
PROVISIONS, SE VERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, from time to time it becomes necessary to amend the City of Edgewater
Comprehensive Plan, and
WHEREAS, such amendments are permitted subject to the provisions of Chapter 163, F.S.
and Rule 9J-11, F.A.C.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board, sitting as the City's Local Planning Agency,
held an advertised Public Hearing pursuant to 163.3164(18) & 163.3174(4) (a), Fla. Stat. (2006),
on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 on the proposed Plan Amendment and following that Public Hearing
voted and recommended that the City Council approve the aforesaid Amendment to the City's 2003
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council feels it is in the best interests of the citizens of the City of
$02007-0-18
St nek through passages are deleted.
Underlined Passages are added.
Edgewater to amend its 20.. Comprehensive Plan as more particula. , set forth hereinafter.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDGEWATER , FLORIDA:
PART A. AMENDMENT.
Amending the Intergovernmental Coordination Element, and the Capital Improvements
Element by amending the goals, objectives, and policies, by including the Public School Facilities
Element and by providing consistency with other elements of the comprehensive plan, hereby
described in Exhibit "A".
PART B. PUBLICATION.
Notice of this proposed change of the Edgewater Comprehensive Plan shall be published in
the manner prescribed by 163.3184 (15) (c), Fla. Star. (2006). The City Council shall hold at least
TWO (2) advertised Public Hearings on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The first
publication shall appear at least SEVEN (7) days before the first Public Hearing (Transmittal
Hearing). 163.3184 (15) (b) 1., Fla. Stat. (2006). The second publication shall appear at least FIVE
(5) days before the second Public Hearing (Adoption Hearing). 163.3184 (15) (b) 2., Fla. Stat.
(2006). The required advertisement shall be no less than two columns wide by TEN inches (10")
long in a standard -size or tabloid -size newspaper, and the headline in the advertisement shall be no
smaller than EIGHTEEN (18) point. The advertisement shall not be placed in a portion of the
newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. The advertisement shall be
placed in a newspaper of general paid circulation in the City of Edgewater, and of general interest
and readership in the municipality, not one of limited subject matter, pursuant to Chapter 50 of the
Florida Statutes. Whenever possible, the advertisement shall appear in the newspaper that is
published at least FIVE (5) days a week, unless the only newspaper in the municipality is published
less than FIVE (5) days a week. 163.3184 (15) (c) 2.b., Fla. Stat. (2006). The advertisement shall
k2a07-0-18
Sh ack-Maevgh passages are deleted.
Underlined passages are added. 2
substantially be in the folk ng form:
Notice of Comprehensive Plan Amendment
The City of Edgewater proposes to adopt the following ordinance:
ORDINANCE NO. 2007-0-18
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDGEWATER
AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ORDINANCE
NO. 2003-0-04 AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL
COORDINATION ELEMENT, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
ELEMENT BY AMENDING THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES,
AND POLICIES AND ADDING THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
FACILITIES ELEMENT AND BY PROVIDING
CONSISTENCY WITH THE OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION, HOLDING PUBLIC HEARINGS,
TRANSMITTING THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, THE VOLUSIA GROWTH
MANAGEMENT COMMISSION, VOLUSIA COUNTY, THE
REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, THE ST. JOHNS RIVER
WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, THE DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, THE FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND ANY OTHER
UNIT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT OR GOVERNMENTAL
AGENCY THAT HAS REQUESTED A COPY OF THE PLAN
AMENDMENT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING
PROVISIONS, SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
A public hearing (transmittal stage) on the ordinance changing the Comprehensive Plan will
be held on September 24, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. at the Community Center, 102 N. Riverside Drive,
Edgewater, Florida 32132.
PART C. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
As a condition precedent to the adoption of this ordinance amending the City's 2003
Comprehensive Plan, the City Council shall hold at least two advertised public hearings on the
proposed comprehensive plan or plan amendment as follows: The first public hearing shall be held
at the transmittal stage pursuant to subsection 163.3184 (15) (b), Fla. Stat. It shall be held on a
#2007-0-18
Shack fin otot passages are deleted.
Underlined passages are added.
weekday at least 7 days af, dre day that the first advertisement is p. dished. The second public
hearing shall be held at the adoption stage. It shall be held on a weekday at least 5 days after the day
that the second advertisement is published. 163.3184, Fla. Star. (2006). The Adoption Hearing shall
be held within 120 days of the Department of Community Affairs having issued its Objections,
Comments, and Recommendations Report to the City.
PART D. TRANSMITTAL OF AMENDMENTS TO PLAN.
Immediately following the Transmittal Hearing, the City Manager or his designee shall send
SIX (6) copies of the proposed Plan Amendment to the Florida Department of Community Affairs,
Division of Community Planning, Plan Processing Team, and all other items specified to be
transmitted in accordance with Rule 9J-11.006, F.A.C. The City Manager or his designee shall also,
immediately following the Transmittal Hearing, transmit a copy of the proposed Plan Amendment
to the Volusia Growth Management Commission, Volusia County, Regional Planning Council, the
St. Johns River Water Management District, (Water Management District), Florida Department of
Transportation, Department of Environmental Protection, Volusia County School District and to any
other unit of local government or governmental agency in the State that has filed a written request
with the City of Edgewater for a copy of such plan amendment. 163.3184 (3) (a), Fla. Stat. (2006)
and Rule 9J-11.006, F.A.C. Within TEN (10) working days following the Adoption Hearing, the
City Manager or his designee shall transmit FIVE (5) copies of the Plan Amendment and a copy of
this ordinance to the Department of Community Affairs. The City Manager or his designee shall
also transmit within TEN (10) working days a copy of the adopted Amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan to the Volusia Growth Management Commission, Volusia County, Regional
Planning Council, the St. Johns River Water Management District (Water Management District),
Florida Department of Transportation, and Department of Environmental Protection. 163.3184 (7),
Fla. Stat. (2006) & Rule 9J-11.011 (3), F.A.C.
#2007-O-18
Strvek-Mrongh passages are deleted.
Underlined passages are added. 4
PART E. CO, LICTING PROVISIONS.
All ordinances and resolutions, or parts thereof that are in conflict with this ordinance, are
hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict.
PART F. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This ordinance shall become effective upon its final adoption; and either the Department of
Community Affairs entering a final order finding this Comprehensive Plan Amendment in
compliance, or the Administration Commission entering a final order finding that this
Comprehensive Plan Amendment has been brought into compliance and certification of consistency
from the Volusia Growth Management Commission.
PART G. SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY.
If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional,
inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this
ordinance or any provisions thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or
circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or
circumstance.
PART H. ADOPTION.
After a motion by Councilwoman Lichter with second by Councilwoman Rhodes, the vote
on the first reading of this ordinance held on September 24, 2007 is as follows:
AYE NAY
Mayor Mike Thomas X
Councilman Debra J. Rogers X
Councilman Dennis A. Vincenzi X
Councilwoman Harriet B. Rhodes X
Councilwoman Judy Lichter X
#2007-0-1S
St tickthnough passages are deleted.
Underlined passages are added. 5
After a motion by oncilwoman Rhodes with second by CMcilwoman Rogers, the vote
for second reading/public hearing on this ordinance during the meeting held on January 28, 2008
is as follows:
AYE NAY
Mayor Mike Thomas
X
Councilman Debra J. Rogers
7
Councilwoman Gigi Bennington
X
Councilwoman Harriet B. Rhodes
X
Councilman Ted Cooper
X
;D AND DULY ADOPTED this 28th day of January, 2008
Lisa A. Bloomer
Interim City Clerk
For the use and reliance only by the City of
Edgewater, Florida. Approved as to form and
legality by: Carolyn S. Ansay, Esquire
City Attorney
Doran, Wolfe, Amy & Kundid
#2007-0-18
Shock d rongi passages are deleted.
Underlined passages are added.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF EDGEW FLORIDA
B
Mike homas
Mayor
�i2v"1—�° TIK
Robin L. Matusick
Paralegal
Approved by the City Council of the City of
Edgewater at a meeting held on this 28th day
of January, 2008 under Agenda Item No. 7A.
EXHIBIT "A"
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
EFFECTIVE 2008
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A.
INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................X-1
B.
SUMMARY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROJECTED DEMAND ...................
X-2
1.
Projected Population by Jurisdiction and Planning Area...........................................................
X-3
2.
Student projections for Volusia County and School Planning Areas ......................................
X-6
3.
Student Projections by School Planning Area.. ...........................................................................
X-6
4.
School Utilization for Volusia County ..........................................................................................
X-8
5.
Volusia County School Board Capital Improvements Program 2007-8 through 2011-12
X-15
6.
Summary of Current Revenues....................................................................................................
X-22
7.
Projected Capital Facility Needs - 2012-2025............................................................................X-24
8.
Coordination of Concurrency Service Areas with Local Government Land Use Plans
.... X-33
C. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES...................................................... X-34
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
A. INTRODUCTION
In 2005 the Florida Legislature adopted tequirements for all local governments to instimte
mandatory planning for schools. The requirements called for cooperative efforts between local
governments and school boards to develop long-term plans for the provisions of necessary
educational facilities to meet current and future needs These plans were accompanied by
requirements to institute school concutrency to ensure that weeded facilities are in place to serve the
needs of new development at the time the student demand resulting from the new development
The Volusia County School Board and the 17 local governments began formal development
of the pubhc school facilities element in the summer of 2006. The planning task was supported by a
broad -based effort to involve vatious segments of the community in the planning process. The
School Board appointed a Stakeholders Committee that included representatives from the real estate
and building interesm teachers, school administrators. elected officials and a vatiety of citizen
local government comprehensive plans.
The approach to the Public School Facilities Element (PSFE)oloved in Volusia Count
the prepazation of the PSFE. capital improvements element and intergovernmental coordination
element as model elements that can be adopted as presented or with minor modifications to account
for local conditions. The key features including the level of service. concmrency service meas. and
the capital improvements program will need to be the same in all jurisdictions. but there is some
room in the process for adjustments to accommodate local land use conditions- review and
The Volusia County PSFE model element is presented in two sections The first section
X-1
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPRF.HENSfVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
1 A Brief Smtmaiy Of School Plannim In Voluaia Comte
school and community needs and develop relationships that can help foster cooperation on key
issues In 2003 the School Boazd and the local governments adopted the current interlocal
agreement and the vatiow School District and local government planning_ staffs have been active in
implem nting the agreement As a result when planning began to implement the PSFE
requirement the planning mffs and School District staff already had a solid working relationship
that allowed for a frank and broad -based discussion of issues and potential solutions.
approved an amendment to the C ujy Charter including school planning as a mandat ty element
f the comprehensive pknning procin addition to state requirements The charter amendment
language is:
co pmbenticrplan. ordinance or resolution hmtidon.r
B. SUMMARY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROJECTED DEMAND
X-2
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
ou uts.
1. Projected Roopulation by jurisdiction and planuing area
The following tables present popi&don estimates and projections duough the end of the
planning_period in 2025. The Bureau of Economic and Business Reseuch (BEBR)mid-range
projections were used as the control values while allocation to individual local governments and to
school planning areas was done based on cent and anticipated development trends. The data was
reviewed by technical staff from the School District and each local government and the resulting
distribution was approved by the technical staff. Table 1 resents pgpulation by local goveroment.
X-3
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
TABLET
VOLUSIA COUNTY
PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACILITIES
ELEMENT
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
WRISDICTION
2000 CENSUS
2005 BEBR
2010
2015
2m
202255
Daytona Beach
64112
65129
69432
73736
78040
82344
Daytona Beach Shores
4299
4661
4818
4976
5133
5m
DeBaN
15559
18222
20000
22000
23500
25000
DeLand
20904
2LQ55
28759
32462
35548
37400
Deltona
69543
82973
95672
105196
109958
114720
Edgewater
1866
21156
23154
25819
30483
34481
HoUy
12119
12620
12765
12910
13055
132W
Lake Helen
2743
2847
2961
3076
3190
DQ5
New Smyrna Beach
20048
22025
25043
28464
32284
34095
Oak Hill
1378
1222
2130
2343
2553
2765
omp CCin.
6604
8854
9126
9398
9670
9942
Ormond Beach
36301
39683
42533
45951
48800
51079
Pierson
2596
2633
3110
3587
4064
4541
Ponce Wet
2513
3247
3511
3776
4040
4305
Pon Orange
45U.3
540rQ
62048
70949
78366
84300
South Daytona
13177
13955
14502
15050
15597
16146
Uniocoelwmtc
106956
115037
125536
131407
139081
147285
Total
443343
494649
545100
591300
633362
670200
Sources: U.S. Census
Bureau of Economic & Business Research
TMH C.Wtine
Table 2 redistributes the Population projections by eight school planning ueas. The
X4
2007-O-I8
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Plaanin, Area
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
North HaWt
Ormond Beach
39683
42533
45951
48800
51079
Unincorpomted
27167
29176
30126
31564
33064
Subtotal
66850
71709
76077
80364
84143
Central Halifax
Dalrtona Beach lna�n)
56031
60061
64084
6809A
72104
Holly l-Iill
12620
12765
12910
13055
13200
South Daytona
13955
14502
15050
15597
16146
Uninmtpmated
3780
4574
4910
5454
6001
Subtotal
86386
91902
96954
102204
107451
South Halifax
Daytona Beach (pw)
%98
9371
9652
9942
10240
Daytotm Beach Shores
4661
4818
4976
5133
5292
Ponce Inlet
3247
3511
3776
4040
4305
Pon Oeanae
5463
62048
70949
78366
84300
Unincorporated
14387
15603
16215
17110
18063
Subotal
86023
95351
105568
114591
122200
Southeast
�gewatee
21156
23154
25819
30483
34481
New Smyma Beach
22025
25043
28664
32284
394_i9
Oak Hill
1922
2130
2343
2553
2765
Unincorporated
18061
19775
20585
21813
23197
Sobmtal
63164
70102
77411
87133
94538
Del ag
Deltona
82973
95672
105196
109958
114720
UniuMporeted
5229
6485
7079
8978
9011
Subotal
88202
102157
112275
118936
123731
DeBary-Otama City
DeBan
18
20000
22000
23500
25000
Orana Ciw
8854
9126
9398
9670
9942
Uninwmomted
8344
9189
10499
11261
12012
Subotal
3542Q
38315
41897
44431
46954
Deland
Deland
25055
28759
32462
35548
37440
Lake Helen
2847
2961
3076
3190
3305
Unincorporated
27193
22585
DIU
32427
34255
Subtotal
55095
61305
66253
71165
74960
Northwest
Pit gmn
2633
3110
3587
4064
4541
Uwncomorated
10876
11149
11278
11474
11682
Subtotal
13509
14259
14865
15538
16223
To
494649
545100
591300
634362
670200
X-5
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
2. Student projections for Volusia Cotmty and School Planning Areas
Population projections and the regeoaranhic distribution of population axe key inputs into the
ptoiection of student demand Overall student demand was projected from the student generation
rates developed in the school impact fee smdyaapplied to the population projections presented
above These rates yielded Table 3 with student projections for the planning period at the
countywide level As with most school districts in Florida the last year or two have been relatively
appropriate.
TABLE3
VOLUSIA COUNTY
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
FACILITIES ELEMENT
STUDENT PROJECTIONS
-COUNTY
YEAR POPULATION
HOUSEHOLDS
STUDENTS
ELEMENTARY
MIDDLE
HIGH
OTHER
2005 494649
213211
64603
29136
14471
19769
1227
2010 545100
234957
67647
31759
15098
19413
1377
2015 59130 0
254871
74526
34861
16639
21518
15.0
2020 633362
273001
81219
37880
18138
235M
1635
2025 670200
Notes:
288879
87775
40837
19607
25572
1759
1. Households
based on 2000 Census of 2.32
2. Students based
on impact fee weighted
avemgg of .303
3 Grade distdbution based on distribution from Volusia County Schools as
Elementary
.451. Middle .224. High .306.
Other .019
4. 2010 pmmlections are from school district demog_raphu
3. Student Projections by School Planning Area
The following tables provide the student 12ro ections by_gxade level for each school planning
area. The countywide student projections repotted above were used as the control values for the
change to the anal
In the DeBary-Orange City planning mea new middle school and high school construction
now under way will modify the impacts to adjacent planning areas as well as create capacity within
X-6
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
the DeBaU-Orange City planning azea The projections have been modified to account fot these
impacts nd the adjustments ate noted with the appropriate tables
TABLE4
VOLUSIA COUNTY
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
ELEMENTARY STUDENT PROJECTIONS
-- SCHOOL PLANNING
AREA
Plaanina Area
21Q_5
2010
2015
1�
2025
North Halifax
3101
3319
3612
3913
4225
Central Halifax
42228
4281
4672
5095
5594
South Halifax
4368
4396
5030
5608
6169
Southeast
1051
3200
3691
4372
4983
Ddtm
7438
8366
9045
9512
9908
DeB=/Orange City
2019
2337
2598
2775
2983
Deland
4218
4670
5002
5347
5660
Northwest
1039
1110
1211
1258
1311
Total
29464
31759
34861
TABLES
VOLUSIA COUNTY
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENT PROJECTIONS- SCHOOL
PLANNING AREA
kkunm Area
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
Noah Halifax
1964
2095
2241
2390
2545
Crntral Halifax
1509
1490
1684
1894
2142
South H.H.
2557
2567
2882
3169
3448
Southeast
1538
1530
1774
2112
2416
Ddtona'
4745
4176
4513
4744
4942
DcBM/Orange City li
0
1163
1282
1371
1474
Deland �
25_0
2077
2242
2413
250
Northwest
0
Q
20
44
72
Total
14653
15098
16639
18138
19607
Note- 1 Addition of Middle DD is D&b
/Orange Caro
draws
763 from Deltona
and
400 from Deland Planning Areas
2 Middle DD opens with 1163 including student
acowth factor
for 2005-2010
X-7
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
TABLE6
VOLUSIA COUNTY
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
V i(H:6YN:O161A9;ZO1 Xai0 O1NMIal:OZON J80ZIx.ilu
Planamg Area
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
North Halifax -
2QO9
1207
2106
2310
2521
Cantral Hahfax
3454
3337
3602
3890
4228
South Halifax
2797
2702
3132
3524
3905
Halifax
8260
7946
8841
23
10655
Southeast
2060
1978
2311
2773
3188
Ddto.
5519
3608
4069
4386
4654
DeBary/Orange City'
0
2253
2416
255.7
2678
Deland �
3282
2710
2935
3169
3381
Northwest
919
91B
246
978
Q@
Toral
20040
19413
21518
23566
25572
Note: 1. Addition of DDD removed 1190 from Deports
and 620 from Deland Subareas.
4. School Utilization for Voluaia Cotmty
FISH capacity_(FISH is the Flotida Inventory of School Houses and represents the official design
capacity of a school facility based on current State standards.) Breakouts of this info=ation by
School Planning area ate available in Appendix C of the data and analysis re art.
Based on 2007-08 school yea data. elementary schools are operating at 108°/u of permanent
FISH capacity district wide. This represents a 14 percent decline from the previous school year with
weeelr-e this hnprovement being attributable to the opening of Mona ee-6eve Cypress Creek
new and expanded facilities added capacity to the system and relieved crowding at existing schools.
The schools with available capacity tend to be located in older core city areas where growth impacts
have been minimal and enrollments have either been stable or declining. These schools also
tvoically showed declines in utilization levels from the previous yeaz.
Middle.
X-8
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
The high schools are ope dng at 444 110% of p�ent FISH capac4 representing an
oldest high schools that have not yet undergone a comprehensive plant upgrade although significant
renovations have been or are scheduled at each school Four 4ee of the .,,.,vnt nine high schools
aze opemting at or below their FISH capacity and only dss two high schools inu ased their level
of utilization ovet the prior yeaz.
X-9
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
scxee� 299F7996
-
FF�e..i_g
�..«.•
2996299i
. se �..i_g
4atilia.dew
4;6s�e
499
¢.I}
7-7�6
442
i4
-a4
^.. _-^--••,, 24.2
269
9&44
299
4444
994
6„ 496
25ti
4-�
i,
293
4�
Jl L
499
264
4944
is
aQ
+"4
-_;�i
s 44 4
i94
398
#
4-4
-6494
9"
949
45
#W#
443
"444
�6
im
;4w
994
664
329
4444
94
446
4w
4-
443
4"
4- s
4o44
7�ry¢
iii
q-�
a5e
iii
q- 6
fiN
c 329
699
,.,,.,
f�R
"0
4-�
ME4
cog 4"
i g2
4-�
lea
bia
ice'.
A�i
may; 4�e
569
44 b
¢9$
"14
44 b
494
b44
494
994
543
4_i
494
u 4X4
iH
664
436
666E
6;4
434
322
594
43�
749
f!*
4- Q
-244
+ 4�4
406
92A6
426
4�
44
4I<4
- - -
499
Hi
49L
4"44
aye 994
62i
44E44
944
69F
44144
494
owe 469
4i4
442
464
4.W
i
4y6
865
643
",I%
4R
EE
-4@4
,•... ;, d33
29¢
41.9 6
2144
294
.1694
4
4�..,
4"
4994
isa
994
4"6
9?4
1 4 4"
449
969_4
4224
449
4R4
444
41e 899
6A6
4- 96
34,
526
iiE4
b
&�6
6"1
Eoi
;894
40�
a.a ., 6a6
553
}}}94
6w
553
4- 6
i%
449
d76
4- s
494
44
4- 6
40 b
4W
3,44
4-
499
9."
4-�
84
- - - 476
493
946
444
49�
AW4
9i6
299
454
41�
aE
i b
i
4;4
44.
444
944
6 499
4ia
09444
4&4
462
4�
4_4
9"
"A
4x�
892
6-i4
41�
-3�4 6
W40
699
NH4
9&2
969
4-�
4
394
44
4- b
765
44
4- '
i�b
,... , d92
Obi
$w.
3 G9
453
"4
044
766
424
iQ4
=6
999
653
4948
&R
4949
969
54
41.
4;L4
443
4394
4i6
894
649
4i-�
9"
4.Q
4"6
$�i
4922
4w
49944
9"
699
ll�
-444
4+.6 .. 392
&"
416
7e4
¢¢}
4Q&q�
mi�i
46;
444
494;
4"
111
OR4
464
*k�
"a
42696
957
669
4"44
fya
x-10
2007-0-I8
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
_,....•. 2444 239" 426% 24428 422% 444
TABLE 7
VOLUSIA COUNTY
PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACILITIES ELEMENT
CURRENT UTILIZATION - ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
SCHOOL
2006-2007
2007-2008
Enrollment
Capacity
Utilization
Encllmmt
Capacity
Utilization
Change
BI—
655
703
93%
585
703
83%
-10%
B—r
412
551
75%
362
551
66%
-9%
Bu ,0A wu
234
250
94%
231
250
92%
-1%
Cbsnoim
375
297
126%
380
479
79%
-47%
C-c do
321
282
114%
309
282
110%
da/o
Cypress Creek
630
742
85%
85°/o
DeBvy
798
561
142%
779
561
139%
-3%
Delmna Laces
1021
744
137%
993
926
107%
-30%
niscovery
876
543
161 %
841
725
116%
-45%
Fdaeaa�e<
664
729
91%
646
729
89%
-2%
Fnm.pdsc
693
489
142%
659
489
135%
-7%
Forest Lake
758
551
138%
712
551
129%
-8%
F•ac .
692
600
115%
790
782
101%
-14°/
Fdandsldp
788
528
149%
753
528
143%
-7%
Holly Hdl
648
569
114%
568
569
100%
-140/
H=on
921
543
170%
880
543
162%
-8`Yo
Hunt
436
655
67%
480
655
73%
7%
mdan ltive.
710
546
130%
679
546
124%
-6%
Loogstren
425
456
93%
383
456
84%
-9%
m.,w ,Comae
760
750
101%
786
750
105%
3%
Mvts
940
621
151%
942
621
152%
Oa/o
Mdmis
464
420
110%
449
420
107%
-4%
0.,Cq
657
517
127%
639
517
124%
-3%
0—dsem6
341
294
116%
342
294
116%
0
On a
262
254
103%
319
254
126%
22a/
Osceota
425
449
95%
450
449
100%
6%
Osrem
747
525
142%
758
764
99%
A3%
Palm T—
635
810
789/o
519
810
64/
-14/
Park ,,
639
553
116%
658
725
91%
-25%
Pc.—
485
376
129%
495
376
132%
3%
Pme T.w
841
604
139%
792
786
101%
-38'/o
Port0.,
480
344
140%
398
344
116%
-24%
Rm -Pamm
478
493
97%
492
493
loo./t
3%
s,mada
257
156
165%
215
156
138%
-27%
ScvJlc
118
0
110
0
0%
Smell
454
452
loos/o
473
452
105%
4°/
Somh D,,—
802
670
12WIo
737
978
75%
-44%
spirit
852
768
111%
887
768
115%
5%
Space Creek
765
641
119%
676
823
82%
-37%
Sovke
395
457
86%
410
457
90%
3%
S��M
766
623
123%
723
623
116%
-7%
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSWE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Sum,, 1018
553
184%
943
531
178%
fi%
Sweetwater 974
543
179%
556
543
102%
-77%
T-b,.me 896
540
166%
928
722
129%
-37%
Toted. 861
690
125%
815
690
118%
-7%
voiva�a rlors 704
563
125%
710
563
126%
1%
westsde 486
513
95%
448
513
87%
-7 %
w�ww,m 857
652
131%
839
630
133%
2%
TOTAL 29786
24428
122%
29169
27119
108%
-14%
X-12
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
WO(61m :I big] :l M-316:I :7
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
924
+F4i
;Q94
799
4
W44
3a6
r 4339
4-4
4-3
kaii
4444
40,
4w.
}5a
4- 6
4-�
46"
4- 6
4- c
�s
4-9
4344
444W
44-W
43396
sac
yy 45a8
4- 4
41- /
i$ig
4- 5
4-1�
3�i
4- a
44ER
41-�
4465
4459
Qilo
iJii
+�na 925
44394
95544
4944
4@94
06"
4-�
14 19
E74
79�6
64e
;i
7746
4
>
4-448
P06
4- 6
44"4
4�4
-- - - 4494
4aa9
831c
93i
442&4
74g4
=Hoi
4- a
4- 8
4- 5
4- 6
4-l4li
4-�
-aac
4'readweeww6i4
648
40494
�44
648
4994
6%
_,._.. 4446&
�s9
430Q
&TING as
m2%
up gaw,
4449;
4967
U494
Sac
Sf,44996 2996a996
43w�aYeseet
4&49
4
4114
-- --
44444
£ -- - --
4- 7
4544
414tlieawew
9�6
4
=c
e 428a
49"
44a
33.1la
29"
447
446
sue, a"
493a
4i}i6
ads
4- a
4.1"
4%
d 4"
4- a
4i4
4- 7
ili!!A
44v.
-6;94
99"
4&94
4294
aa@.
2435
9a6c
4WA4
aka
49"
4- 9
4694
�li"
44;44
�c
fite5enae Q�
48a3
44�
41, 3
4- a
31"94
=6
fin.rosnek a79i
a966
41- q
illiIii
aQ6
4-6
444
Inlet
9"
41- c
444
4"
4-�
444
,V.T.. 2m_e
45854
4awc
aw"
43676
U444
lay.
TABLE 8
VOLUSIA COUNTY
PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACILITIES ELEMENT
CURRENT UTILIZATION - MIDDLE SCHOOLS
SCHOOL 2006-2007 2007-2008
Enrolment Capacity Utilization Enrollment Capacity Utilization Change
cvnpGeu 790 1178 67% 771 1178 65% -2%
X-13
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Creeks,de
1212
1131
107%
1191
1131
105%
-2 %
Da—d
1664
1161
143%
1599
1161
138%
-6%
Dclt�a
1462
1190
123%
1471
1190
124%.
1%
Gat
1814
1166
156%
1763
1166
151%
4%
eedmW
1465
1150
127%
1450
1150
126%
-1%
FBnson
1034
1094
95%
1063
1071
99%
5%
eouyM
640
873
73%
620
873
71%
-2%
Naw3myma
1469
1118
131%
1391
1118
124%
-7%
Om,oad Beach
977
1250
78%
925
1250
74%
-4%
Su�ees &
1252
1108
113%
1280
1108
116%
3%
S uthwrsecm
714
648
110%
730
622
117%
7%
TOTAL
14493
13067
111%
14254
13018
109%
-1%
TABLE 9
VOLUSIA COUNTY
PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACILITIES ELEMENT
CURRENT UTILIZATION - HIGH SCHOOLS
SCHOOL
2006-2007
2007-2008
En[ollmeot
Capacity
Utilization
Enrollment
Capacity
Utilization
Change
Adcn.c
1470
1531
96%
1370
1532
89%
-7%
DrLam
3382
2901
117%
3466
2870
121%
4%
Dehom
2900
1920
151%
2949
1920
154%
3%
My d
1979
2344
84%
1825
2344
78%
-7%
New Smyrna
2048
2235
92%
2027
2334
87%
-5%
wee cadge
2594
1888
137%
2426
1827
133%
-5%
seanae�e
1963
1827
107%
1955
1827
107%
0%
Spmae Cmek
2816
2066
136%
2741
2066
133%
-4/
Taylor
951
863
110%
970
1217
80%
-30%
TOT,
20103
17575
114%
19729
17937
110%
-4%
X-14
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT `A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
5. Volmia Co=!y School Board Capital Improvements Program 2007-8 thmug_h
2011-12
The remainine kev data Diece contributing to the Droiections of school needs
through the end of the planning period is the planned construction of new capacity. The
data and analysis prepaxed at the begingiag of the PSFE planning effort is based on the five-
year capital improvements program adopted by the School District as an element of their
2006-2007 budget. This CIP
is the current adopted
five -yen program for the District and reflects new schools and additions to existing facilities.
Planned additional capacity is presented in two tables. The fast table includes
facilities expected to open with the beginning of
&eiktiee! There ate eeYea eleven projects uedeewnr opening as shown on Table 10. Table
facilities are made.
X-15
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
1e
6deat
TOW
N
I
PA# .. ;.kee
Aeheee
A d; is
aae
4ga
4993
eeae
Bekeea
fdditiee
325
iaa
29e3
6 eea•6eede
&-FfdiFee
Aiew
335
335
949;
s�.nd
Adds .
jjQ
3aa
as9w
eteee
Apw
335
a4_9
a993
Seedo-Bawewe
6.fleii4ae
lase
999
49_9
WR
Se6eeeeeee
Middle
Imo
>
zaa
iN
asp
Qii
tee .
a4w
High
Aiceae-�'erlx
Wee9rweee
Reeleee
i23}
359
29"
9HB
9eBa> G�tr
#iew
afie9
4W9
a9w
TABLE 10
VOLUSIA COUNTY
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS OPENING IN 2007
Facility
School
Type of
Total
New
Planning Area
Project
Capacity
Capacity
Elementary
Deltona Lakes
Deltona
Addition
926
182
Discovery
Deltona
Addition
725
182
Cypress Creek
S. Halifu
New
735
735
Freedom
Deland
Addition
782
182
Osteen
Deltona
Replace
764
239
South Daytona
C. Hal fu
Replace
978
308
Timbererest
Deltona
Addition
722
182
Pathways
N. Halifu
Addition
725
172
Pine Trail
N. Halifu
Addition
786
182
Spruce Creek
S. Halifu
Addition
823
182
Chisholm
Southeast
Addition
479
182
Total
8445
2728
Source: Volusia
County School Board
X-16
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Filee.eeteer
X
X
em
Aar i.1rmewaa
Addiden
lab
i
QW;
Aue�'aed Ak-Iialifa»
AJii�iew
7a6
i�2
�
6ea�ee-�eee4
$�}
a$3
2�7
Faeehehe 6
es Addi
439
44a
2e93
N.
411
iii
29"
1 a
ry
asz
11146
99"
Feeee04.1he Pak.
Additiew
794
4-Q
9949
i4eeee 6.44elifea
Ae ee
335
SB
29e8
�Jeeeaide 6.44eliF.e
Addidee
bbi
42
24W
ewweo-sia �eBwy-e5.
Aewerate
4414
4914
44W
ledien-liivee Sex
Addeeew
338
442
Bali
P�ksaa
frP4
AiE
4444
61de�3
d P7err
335
335
29i9
1
BR
ii4
is
244
Fbeeaa-sewNe Aieedweee
�
335
359
29}i
8eewer 6.4{alifae
Rewevele
bbi
a
2914
£sae P
eo
ia
4�2
2Q44
M.6 Pelted
Ii eea
4—OW
474
ag"
Gle�eeet.erd's Palo.
N.
34
34
2944
$le�eeetanr.: &-il.iE.e
N.
34
lab
294Q
$le�eeetaw-FF &.whteam,
N.
6w
big
29W
Pee,eed4k.e6 4;r;letike
gmisat
425
4
2944
-
ih a
4- 4
4- 9
294.]
AfiddlwFF ieelheex
P:ew
940
iig
2942
High
lieee6vrea!
433i
368
299g
eVwtie s.i3a�x
Addieew
ie4e
aeD
29i2
TOW
im—iLk1}k«
228"
ow
TABLE 11
VOLUSIA COUNTY
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 2007-08 - 2011-12
Facility School Type of Total New School
Planing Area Project Capacity Capacity Year
Elementary
X-17
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
ElementaryY
Deltona
New
735
735
2008
DeBary
DeBary-O.C.
Addition
801
240
2009
Forest Lake
Deltona
Addition
733
182
2009
Sweetwater
S. Halifax
Addition
725
182
2009
Hurst
C. Halifax
Replace
735
80
2009
Westside
C. Halifax
Addition
TBD
TBD
2010
Orange City
DeBary-O.C.
Renovate
TBD
TBD
2010
Indian River
Southeast
Addition
728
182
2010
Enterprise
Deltona
Addition
689
200
2011
Elementary D
Deltona
New
1054
1054
2010
Elementary Z
Deland
New
735
735
2010
Sonrise
Deltona
Addition
713
182
2010
Pierson -Seville
Northwest
Replace
735
359
2010
Bonner
C. Halifax
Renovate
551
0
2011
Marks
Deland
Replace
1054
433
2011
Elementary FF
Southeast
New
TBD
TBD
2012
Total
9,988
4,564
Middle
Middle DD
DeBary-().C.
New
1193
1193
2008
Ormond Beach
N. Hahfax
Replace
1250
0
2011
� iddle HH
Delmna
New
1193
1193
2011
Middle FF
Southeast
New
TBD
TBD
2012
Total
3,636
2,386
High
Taylor
Northwest
Replace
1217
354
2007
High DDD
DeBary-O.C.
New
2500
2500
2009
Total
3,717
2,854
Total 19,821 11,243
Source: 2007/08-2011/12 Adopted Volmia School District Facilities Work
Program
*00,
Featli Scheel
New
fiftneft
GlemewYwa
9"
8lseewue. F ALB i� #ier. 335
7S5
4943
Gleteeneanr6 464idif. N. idg
&6mw e
3}#
a4"
X-I8
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSWE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
6entl+weeeere
w
A4,1e
Tse
441&
4944
High
fi`F
Ne�
444&
a44&
qge
TABLE 12
VOLUSIA COUNTY
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS BEYOND FIFTH YEAR
Facility
School
Type of
Total
New
School
Planning Area
Project
Capacity
Capacity
Year
Elementary
Elementary F
DeBaty- O.C.
Few
735
735
TBD
Elementary E
Deltoru
New
735
735
TBD
Elementary A
S. Hahfax
New
735
735
TBD
Elementary B
Southeast
New
735
735
2014
Elementary C
N. Halifax
New
735
735
2014
Middle
Southwestem Deland Addition TBD TBD 2013
High
Atlantic S. Halifax Addition 1840 309 TBD
FFF Deltona New TBD TBD TBD
Source: Volusia County School Board
and 2014, the total elementary level capacity. will increase by 44,64; 8.239 seats or nearly
48% of eurrent capacity.
At the middle school level student capacity will increase by 3.996 1,193 seats or 39
9% of current capacity. In addition to this increase, the K-8 school designated as FF will
have capacity to add 650 additional middle school student stations if these seats axe replaced
with new elementary student stations allowing for the full conversion of the school to a
middle school.
At the high school level student capacity will increase by 3-1�"F 2,809 student stations
or 48 16% of current capacity. Within the proposed five-year program initial planning is also
orog armed for High School FFF in the Deltona or southwest area. Programmed
X-19
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
expenditures are related to Planning and design, and no timetable has been established for
actual construction.
In sum. planned and programmed capital improvements will add 4,7,759 12241
! B
2997."
29"419
299940
i"3"0 3
iBi417 i.atee
T.,!w
46Flj m W199
464
W-W
6.F4elAW 4434
,Q&Q
94
49
49"
9 44diFue 44W
933
4Q
736
4284
a�Ei
4$Q
4822
659 335
4592
"t
356
947
4-9
947
99"
W." 4494
492
2"
335
"4
7�,
;864
Alesdwaeet 19¢
iR
4- 5
44449
Ag."
4- 3
4296 2296
96045
Sxb-Mee 299647 299i418 2998419 2999d9 hmm TOW
#i-F�lifee 4641 "09
F:44ebfwe 2279 2279
eu�hee 4242 &W 4m 9
Seuel,nex 44" 4494 iwi4
97e0 2973 44" aue
Q Q
Feed 449; 9 4494 Q 4492 "o Q 4-3�
299647 a993419 a99&99
a999-19 2969ii a9444a 4.oeee T-
W.ki 3369
999 9974i
6eeel,eex 2235
2225
s
X-20
2007-0-18
I0/:111 13 Y 1�7:fii
:N Y Y i(e7 W 111197 7►Sr/_11 Y 01 l7
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
meer 294 Qcw
aaea
Aleel, - , 40 iko
ia3}
40W 1,54 2866 3500
a
3Q9
4
;3
TABLE 13
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
2007-08 TO 2011-12 PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITIONS
ELEMENTARY CAPACITY ADDITIONS
2007-08 TO 2011-12 PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM
Sub -Area 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
2011-12
Later
Total
N. Halifax 2944
735
3679
C. Halifax 4782 80
4862
S. Halifax 4074 182
735
4991
Southeast 2935 182
735
3852
Southwest 6004 917 1236
200
735
9092
West 5584 240 735
433
735
7727
Northwest 796 359
1155
Total 27119 1339 80 2512
633
3675
35358
MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY ADDITIONS
Sub -Area
2007-08
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
2011-12
Later Total
N. Halifax
2321
2321
C. Halifax
2051
2051
S. Halifax
2239
2239
Southeast
1118
1118
Southwest
3506
1193
4699
West
1783
1193
2976
Northwest
0
Total
13018
1193 0 0
1193
0 15404
HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY ADDITIONS
Sub -Area 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
2011-12 Later Total
Hahfax 7769
309 8078
Southeast 2334
2334
Southwest 3747
3747
West 2870 2500
5370
Northwest 1217
1217
Total 17937 0 2500 0
0 309 20746
Note: K-8 FF proposed for Southeast Planting Area programmed
to open in 2012-13 has not been Accated
between elementary and middle school student stations as yet.
Increase in student station for Southwestern
:diddle School addition programmed for 2013 in the West Planning Area has not yet been determined.
X-21
2007-0-18
Ia111113197.%
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSWE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
6. Summary of Current Revenues
Table 14 provides a summary of capital revenues from the current approved budgeet
These revenues are applied to maintenance pnojects. renewal and replacement projects, and
other eligible capital budget expenses as well as for new capacity generation. 6iaee-eew
The revenues
X-22
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
TABLE 14
VOLUSIA COUNTY
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
SUMMARY OF BUDGETED REVENUES 2007-8 TO 2011-12
Source
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-2011
2011-12
Five -Year
Total
CODS
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
2,000,000
PECO
9,126,330
3,740,455
3,873,185
3,993,943
4,159,502
24,893,415
Classrooms
10,079,213
10,079,213
for Kids
Total State
19,605,543
4,1405455
4,273,185
4,393,943
4,559,502
36,972,628
Sources
Ad Valorem
78,482,976
83,191,954
88,183,471
93,474,480
99,082,948
442,415,829
2 mi
Sales Tax
37,284,508
38,403,043
39,555,134
40,741,788
41,964,042
197,948,515
/2 cent
Interest
9,600,000
4,200,000
4,200,000
4,200,000
4,200,000
26,400,000
Income
Impact Fees
14,500,000
17,651,880
17,651,880
17,651,880
17,651,880
85,107,520
Total Local
139,867,484
143,446,877
149,590,485
156,068,148
162,898,870
751,871,864
Sources
Total
159,473,027
147,587,332
153,863,670
160,462,091
167,458,372
788,944,492
Revenue
New Debt
40,503,680
153,915,064
47,114,496
241,533,240
COPS
Projects in
311,976,026
311,976,026
Progress
Beginning
57,070,409
65,218,244
38,717,755
45,681,977
40,769,150
247,457,535
Balance
Total Other
369,046,435
105,721,924
192,632,819
92,796,473
40,769,150
800,%6,801
Sources
Total AB
528,519,462
253,309,256
346,496,489
253,258,564
208,227,522
1,589,811,293
Sources
The adopted budget shows that 9444 neady one-third of the total funding, inch
borrowing, of the total funding comes from the local two mil levy on DIODem. This is the
District's most flexible funding source and expenditures from this source must be apphed to
maintenance needs, renewal and replacement needs, buses, portable classrooms and other
similar expenditures in addition to funding new capacity. The local option sales tax
approved bX the Volusia County voters in 2000 will expire in 2016, but all of this funding
are directly linked to new residential building permits. Collections have been lower than
anticipated over the last two years as housing starts have declined, and they are expected to
X-23
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
remain at lower levels over the next few years. impact fee collections are limited in that they
can only be used to fund new capacity.
Other sources. including State funding, are relatively minor in that they account for
7. Projected Capital Facility Needs - 2012-2025
The projection of needed capital improvements begins with the School District's
facilities including warehouse, maintenance, transportation and administrative facilities that
have been determined to be necessaU by the School District. Table 15 summaries the initial
five-year program for added student capacity and ancillary facilities, which will be adopted by
reference by the local government and annually updated by the adoption of future five-year
programs.
In order to identify the timing and location of needed schools for the period
then examined at the school planning area level to determine if there were any smaller area
impacts on middle schools that needed to be considered.
Schools were assumed to be needed when there were sufficient students available
within the service area to comprise 800/0 of the standard size for the school level. The
analysis area was also tested for compliance with the designated level of service standard to
identify any LOS violations that might occur prior to the general need for a new school. A
school was assumed to be needed when either demand reached 80% of standard school size
or the analysis area exceeded the LOS for that area. This appmach ptovides an indication of
when and where LOS issues may be expected, but it does not get down to the individual
school level since the error level over the term of the study is too great to make projections
reasonable. At the individual scbool IeveL LOS issues may be encountered sooner than
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
year. This table and map only Est capacity. anciEaty or replacement Projects. Other capital
maintenance projects ue not reflected nor are needs for school replacement.
TABLE 15
VOLUSIA COUNTY
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 2007-8 TO 2011-12
Fadfi
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
New Elementari D
1200000
28,000-000
2,400,000
New ElemegMiyZ
1.200A00
22273.000
2.400 000
New Centul Warehouse
11,990,000
1,850,000
Pierson -Seville Replacement
1.2 00.000
22.273.000
2.4 00.000
Chishohn Elemenma Addition
800 000000
7 000.000
1.000 000
Ent rise Elemen Addition
150 000000
4100 000
200 000
Indian River Elemen Add.
150 000000
3.20000
18000 0
Orange City Elementary
800000000
8.000.000
1,000,000
R lacement
estside Elemen= Addition
180 000000
1 006 720
80 000
EDC Replacement (AdminI
13,530,000
2.300.000
Maks Elementary -Re lacement
1,200,000
30.000.000
2,400,000
New Elemen E
1.200.000
22,273,000
2,400,000
New K-8 FF
1,600,000
47,114.496
3.600.000
New Middle HH
1,600,000
45.302-400
3,600,000
Bonner Elemen Renovation
1,000,000
12.000.000
1.2 00.000
FrimdsW Elmentga Addition
15 0000000
3,300,000
180000000
Sunrise Elemen Addition
150 000000
3,200,000
18 0000
New Elemmtag A
1 1-200-000
22,273-680
2.4 00.000
New Ujgh School FFF
2.6 00.000
Ormond Beach Middle Re lace.
24,865.984
2.0 00.000
Ad� School Addition
200 000000
4,781,920
380 000000
New Elemen F
1.3 00.000
24.2 00.000
New Elemen B
1.2 00.000
New Elemen C
1.2 00.000
Southwestern Middle Addition
50 0000000
TABLE 16
VOLUSIA COUNTY
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY ELEMENT
PROJECTED SCHOOL NEEDS 2011-12 TO 2025-26
SCHOOL
LOCATION
START
OPEN
NOTES
ElemmtaU F
West
10-11
12-13
Elemen B
Southeast
11-12
13-14
Elan
N. Halifax
11-12
13-14
Southwestem
West
11-12
13-14
Addition. C..,jm TBD
X-25
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Middle
Elementary
S. Halifax
18-19
20-21
Middle
Southeast
20-21
LOS Need
Phased FF conversion
Likh
Halifax/SE
17-18
20-21
LOS need
Elemenmy
Southwest
19-20
21-22
Flementaaa
C. Halifax
21-22
23-24
Elements
West
21-22
23-24
Middle
I S. Halifax
22-23
24-25
Elementau
N. Halifax
23-24
25-26
FlementaU
S. Halifax
23-24
25-26
Elementary
Southeast
23-24
25-26
Required sooner if FF is
based to middle
Elementary
NW
24-25
25-26
LOS need
9 class addition
LLp—h
West SW
22-23
25-26
LOS need
Land Banked School Sites
The Volusia County School District has routinely_ purchased sites for schools in
anticipation of future need. Table 16 provides a projection of antiupated school site needs
by location and the data and analysis report contains a listing of available sites. In addition
to the known need generated by_proiected schools the plan recommends maintaining and
inventory of additional sites to give the School District and local governments flexibility to
address short tear shifts in population and/or student growth and to provide additional
Elementary School Sites: North Halifax
South Halifax
Southeast
Southwest
West
Middle School Sites: Halifax/Southeast
Southwest/West
Northwest (flex site for elementary or middle school)
X-26
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
High School Sites Halifax/Southeast
Southwest/West
Ancillary Facilities
The ro osed work prontam identifies a replacement facility for the Educational
Development Center now housed in an older school facihy that tequires substantial rep
or replacements and a new central warehouse to be located with the central maintenance
facility. These are the remaining ancillary facilities that were identified as required by the
data and analysis. As with classroom needs the ancillary facilities will be monitored and
reviewed on an annual basis and the interlocal agreement includes procedures fox
coordinating the location of ancillary facilities with the local government.
Constrained Schools
The Volusia County School District includes a limited number of schools that have
high utilization levels but due to site conditions cannot be expanded on site. These are
generally schools in rural or semi -rural areas with little planned growth and are generally
smaller schools that have strong community ties. In these cases xezonin to another school
is possible but is an option that is expected to be resisted by parents in these areas. For
these schools, the plan provides for a permanent designation as constrained and the schools
will be maintained at their curtent levels of service. Concurency will be reviewed in the
adjacent concutrency service areas and requests to increase residential densities in the
constrained concurrenry service areas will need to be accompanied by a plan to address
school capacity. The constrained schools will maintain this states until they me replaced or
other improvements are made that bring them within the designated level of service.
The district also occasionally encounters a situation where parents at a him utilized
period new development could be permitted if adequate capacity will be available at the end
of the transition period.
Real and Replacement of School Facilities
Other than construction of new schools the most significant capital cost the School
District must address is maintenance of existing facilities and the replacement of existing
schools when they become obsolete. The condition of existing facilities is addressed in a
survey completed every five years. The next survey for Volusia County will not be complete
assumes that a school will have a useful life of 40 years and progmms for the mplacem nt of
X-27
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Funding Projections for New CapaciEy
Table 17 presents the proposed financial plan for capital itprovements scheduled
within the five-yeaz period beginning with 2007-2008 fiscal year. This table includes fundin¢
for all capital expenses regardless of whether the expense results in the provision of new
student capacity or the replacement of existing schools. (Therefore. this Table 17 will not
exactly correlate with Table 15 as Table 15 only identifies new capacity proiectss school
replacements and ancillary facilities) Revenues and expenditures for the five yeaz program
are balanced demonstrating that the five-yeaz capital improvements program is financially
adoption.
X-28
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
TABLE 17
VOLUSIA COUNTY
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
FINANCIAL PLAN 2007-08 THROUGH 2O11-12
Fund Source
2007-8
2008-9
2009-10
2210-11
2011-
TOW
CO& DS & COBI Bonds
400,000
400000
4W 000
400 000
400 000
2000000
PECO Fixed Cap" 0uflm
3.696.816
504.248
748.285
903230
1034602
6.8V-Ml
PECOMaintenance
2545041
323. 6207
33123900900
3090013013
3123900900
15121061
Classrooms foe Kids
3.700.000
33 7 00 000000
Pro a Tax 2 mills
77297393 ..
81,935.23G
86.851-350
92.026.431
7 77
435.732.587
Im actFee
17651880
17,651.880
17.651-880
17.651.880
17-651-880
83-607.520
YZ Cent Sales Tax
37,284,508
38,403,043
39.555-134
40,741.788
41,964,042
122 a4ul5
Oth Fiaan'
44.603680
160.315A64
4711449G
252.033.240
merest
42. W.000
4200.000
4200.000
4.200-000
420Q000
21000000
5ub-Total
142,123.756
190,934,294
312.846.613
206.164538
165,961.601
1.018 330.804
Pro a is m Pe
325A11. 559
325.411.959
Be '� Balance
56,265,447
44.264.013
2025857
30 016 B02
22,928J50
173 332.982
Total
523.80L164
235-198307
333.105.163
236.181340
188,889.751
1.517. 775.745
2007-8
2008-9
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
Total
New Constmction
30.540.000
75.153 680
156.665.064
86 364 496
34250.000
382.973.240
Pmjecn at Existine
13 .231-340
45.433 056
43 186.423
19 060123
23 815 925
162,726,867
Scho F-F-ahbes
Facdi'e b
4,00 304
4191 516
4359177
4 533544
4 714
21-829,427
l0
11,130,000
11,797.800
12505668
13.256.008
14,051368
62740844
FALw ment Vehicles
3.913.te2
4098841
4293,783
4493472
4713 96
21 17 7
Buses
3813752752
4178088088
3i8232
399.588
5.504.820
14268450
Debt Service
51,641,041
5488175
66.505.034
69.935 989
69.934215
312.898.035
i
3316573
900000
900 000000
900.000
900.000
T116,573
Maintenance
14 305MO
14305 000
14,305,000
14305.000
14305.000
71.525.000
Sub -Total
154-125-192
214,939,737
303.088381
213,253.190
172,189.610
L067.595.110
n
44.264.013
20.258.570
30.016802
22.928.150
16 700141
134.167.676
Toml
523.801164
J 235.198307
333.105.10
2NJL1,340
188.889.751
1517.175.745
Table 18 provides a summary of projected revenues and costs for school projects
five year periods. The adjustment in the second col11tt1t1 as a four year review is done to
allow the pi j coons to dovetail with the typical ,planning windows for local 90vemment
comprehensive plans.
X-29
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Revenues for the each planning period are based on data from the School District
financial management staff and include only those revenues antiupated to be allocated for
new construction As shown in Table 17, the full capital improvements program includes
other classes of capiW eipmditures. The amount of revenue from sales tax collections and
local propeny taxes allocated to new capacity projects is based on historical trends. Impact
fees are required to be fully devoted to new capacity projects.
Revenue and cost projections beyond the initial five-year period me based on
ass umpti ❑ b t the growth in the propem tax base for the local propene tax and
remember that adjustments to taxable value or changes in the impact fee structure could
have significant impacts on revenues over the term of the plan and these items need to be
catefully monitored as pan of the annual review process.
TABLE 18
VOLUSIA COUNTY
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS
Source
2012/13 —
2016/17 —
2020 21
2021 22-
2025 26
2015 16
Revenues
Pro e Tax
$83,715,000
$136,190,000
1149.563.000
Im act Fee
120,836,000
148178.000
147. 551.000
Sales Tax
45,207,000
12,162,000
0
State
0
0
0
Other
4,200,000
5,250.000
5.2 00.000
Total N
1 253,958,000
301.780,000
172. 664.000
Borrowing
31A50-000
46,250,000
74.0 00.000
Total
$285.408,000
$348,030,000
1246.764.000
Expmditwes
New Schools
$72,007,000
$268,657.000
$448.309. 000
Additions
0
0
0
Ang&a
Facilities
0
0
0
Buses/Portables
24, 13.000
36.95L000
45.2 66.000
Debt Service
55, 99.000
62.9 88.000
74.8 88.000
Total
$152,519.000
$36I46. 000
$568,413,000
Variance + -
I 5732,889.000
OZQA16 000
21648 000
X-30
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
In reviewing the financial summary for new capacity, there axe several Points that need
to be noted.
2.
period to reflect the flattening of student growth over the last two years and as
predicted for the upcoming five year period As noted earlier, these trends in student
generation need to be closely monitored so the capital needs can be adjusted
accordingly.
3. The negative balance in the 2016-17 to 2020-21 time period reflects the loss of the
sales tax revenue along with anricipated inueases in smdent generation during these
years. Extension of the sales tax at historical rates would dose the projected funding
gap_-
4.
period will be absorbed and sufficient new demand generated to wmant
construction of new facihdes. There is. of course. the highest level of uncertainly
about demand in the last quarter of the plannju period. and therefore, a significant
deficit in this time window, while requiring monitoring is not as significant as a
similar deficit would be earlier in the planning_ period.
Antiagated financial shortfalls in the latex years of the progmm can be addressed in
several ways. As noted above, re -authorization of the half -cent sales tax would provide an
ca aci .
X-31
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
of the student stations required in 2025 exist today, and the School Board has established the
maintenance of these student stations as a priority. Short-term shifts in expenditure from
renewal and rep-lacement needs to new growth needs can be sustained, but this is clearly a
daneerous practice for system quality over the long term.
Finally,pxoiected student lswth needs to be carefully monitored over the long team
The current plan recognizes that student growth has slowed in recent years, and near term
projections reflect this reduction If this trend continues over the longer term, future needs
and costs for new capacity will be affected. The annual review process will be important in
addressing this issue.
X-32
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
8. Coordination of concurrency service areas with local government land use
plans
The goals, objectives and policies for the Public Scbool Facilities Element define
zones. High schools are gmuped into five lu u con=u service areas that reflect
student movement between schools at this level, and the non-traditional schools or Other
Schools that serve countywide student ,populations are evaluated on a countywide basis.
This concarrency service area format resulted from an extensive discussion of options by
technical staff, elected official and stakeholders over a period of several months. The full
ranee of options considered and the analysis of the various options me discussed in the data
and analysis report and the series of technical memoranda that were generated during the
plan development.
The concept of the central concu ency service areas that have no cent or planned
more significant development directed to cities and other more urban areas. No current ciry
areas are included in the central concurrency service areas. Students living in the central area
me assigned to appropriate schools and future student generation projected based on current
land use and zoning pattems has been evaluated with the overall projected demand for the
affected schools and school planning areas. Future developments that will increase
development density will need to include a plan for addressing anticipated school need as
part of a land use or zoning amendment.
Absent changes to the fawte land use and zoning in the area covered by the central
recommended smart growth rb og=.
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
C. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
GOAL 1:
Collaborate and coordinate with the School Board of Volusia County to provide and
maintain a public education system that meets the needs of Volusia Couniy's current and
future population.
OBJECTIVE 11• Coordination and ron.rirtenry The City shall implement and maintain
mechanisms designed to coordinate with the School Board to provide consistency bemeen
local government comprehensive plans and public school facilities and prontams
Policy I.L1: Pursuant to the Drocedmes and requirements of the adopted
interlocal agreement the City shall coordinate with the School Board
on growth and development trends, general population and student
pno ections to ensure that the plans of the School Board and City are
based on consistent data.
Policy 1.1.2, At the time of transmittal of the Public Schools Facilities Element
the City shall develop a report of projects not subject to school
concurrency and submit the report to the School B and within thirty
(30) days of transmittal The report shall include the We, number
and location of residential units that have received subdivision of site
Dlan approval and provide a projected annual rate of growth for such
projects.
Policy 1.1.1 The City shall provide the representative of the School Board with
copies of all meeting agendas and staff reports
OBJECTIVE 12• Srbool Facility Siting And AvailabikN Th City shall coordntat with the
School Board on the planning and siting of new public schools and anum facilities t
ensure school facilities axe coordinated with necessary services nd infrastructure and are
ccumpatible and consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Policy 1.2.1: The City shall coordinate with the School Board to assure that
p oDosed public school facility sites are consistent with the applicable
X-34
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
land use categories and policies of the comprehensive plan. Schools
shall be permitted in all future land use classifications except fox
industrial land use classifications and environmentally restricted land
use classifications.
Policy 1.2.2:
Coordination of the location. acquisition. phasing and development
of fume school sites and ancillary facilities shall be accomplished
through the procedures adopted in the interlocal agreement.
Policy 1.2.3:
The City and School Board will jointly determine the need for and
timing of on -site and off -site improvements necessary to support
each new school or the proposed renovation, expansion or closure of
an existing school. If deemed necessary. the parties may enter into a
written agreement as to the tuning, location, and party of parties
responsible for constructing, operating and maintaining the required
Policy 1.2A:
improvements.
The City shall encourage the School Board to land bank sites for
future use as school facilities. The City shall coordinate with the
School Board on the acquisition and use of land banked sites in the
same manner as established for other sites in order to ensure
adequate infrastructure is planned and constructed in advance of
Policy 1.2.5:
school construction.
The City shall protect schools and land banked school sites from the
adverse impact of incompatible land uses by providing the School
District with the oppommity to participate in the review process for
Policy 1.2.6:
all proposed development adjacent to schools.
In developing capital improvements plans and programs for public
services. the City shall consider required infrastructure to service
existing and proposed schools and any land banked school sites
Policy 1.3.1: The City shall coordinate with the School Board on opportunities for
the enansion and rehabilitation of existing schools so as to support
neighborhoods and redevelopment.
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Policv 1.3.3: The Citv shall look for opportunities to co -locate and share the use
of public facilities when preparing updates to the comprehensive
plan's schedule of capital improvements and when planning and
desnine new or renovating existing, community facilities Co -
located facilities shall be governed by a written agreement between
the School Board and the City specifying opuating procedures and
maintenance and operating responsibilities.
1. New developments adjacent to schools shall be required to
provide a right-of-way and direct safe access path for pedestrian
travel to existing and planned schools and shall connect to the
neighborhood's pedestrian network.
2. New develooment and redevelopment within two miles of a
school shall be required to provide sidewalks within or adjacent
to the property for the corridor that directly serves the school or
qualifies as an acceptable designated walk or bicycle route to the
school
3. In order to ensure continuous pedestrian access to public
schools. the City shall consider infill sidewalk and bicycle projects
connecting networks serving schools as part of the annual capital
budget process. Priority shall be given to hazardous walking
conditions pursuant to Section 1006.23. Florida Statutes.
4. The City shall coordinate with the Metropolitan Planning
Organization to maximize the funding from the Florida
Department of Transportation and other sources that may be
devoted to improvingpedestriannetworks serving schools.
X-36
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
decisions including but not limited to developments of r gi nal
impact School Bond review shall follow the policies and procedmes
set forth in the interlocal agreement
Policy 14 2: Amendments to the future land use map shall be coordinated with
the School Board and the Public School Facilities Planning Mans
Policy 1.4.3: Where capacity will not be available to serve students from the
property seeking a land use change or other land use determination
that increases residential density the City shall not approve the
proposed land use change until such time as the School Board can
find that adequate public chools can be times planned and
constructed to serve the student population or that the applicant has
provided adequate mitigation to offset the inadequacies in andcip t d
school capacity.
GOAL 2: IMPLEMENC PUBLIC SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
resources.
(OBJECTIVE 2.1: Izcel OfService Standards The City through coordinated planning with the
governments in Volusia County.
Policy 2.1.1: The level of service standards for schools shall be applied
consistently by all the local governments in Volusia County and by
the School Board district -wide to all schools of the same type
2007-O-I8
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Policy 2 11 Consistent with the intedocal agreement, the uniform district -wide
level -of -service standards are set as follows using FISH capaci
based on the traditional school calendar:
1. Elementary Schools: 115% of permanent FISH capacity for the
concuttenry service area.
2. K-8 Schools: 115% of permanent FISH capacity for the
concurrence service area.
3. Middle Schools, 115% of permanent FISH capacity for the
concurency service area.
4. High Schools, 120% of pemtanent FISH capacity for the
concturency service area
5. Special Purpose Schools, 100% of permanent FISH capacity.
Policy 213, The f flowing schools shall acbieve the designated level of service no
later than the identified date.
School
DATE
Orin e City Elemen"
J.1y
1 2012
Horizon Elementuy
July1,
2014
Freedom ElemenJuly
1, 2012
Osceola Elemenutty
July1,
2014
Ortona Elementaryjjuly2014
Ormond Beach Elemen
2014
Southwestern Middle
2013
New Sm rna Beach Middle
2012
(Note, This pohs is intended to designate backlogpd LOS
for those schools that exceed the desired levels during the first five
year capital impnovements oronrarn )
Po iry 2.1.4: The following schools shall be considered constrained schools t the
designated LOS due to the inability to add capacity at the site and th
nature of the communities they serve Concurrency will be reviexved
in the adjacent concurency service areas and requests to mcrease
residential densities in the constrained concurrency service areas will
need to be accompanied by a plan to address school capacity.
X-38
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
School
LOS
Bums -Oak Hill Elemen
115%
Coronado Elemen
115%
Sameula Elements
165%
Source: Volusia County Interlocal Agreement
Policy 2.1.5: The Citv and School Board recomize and agree that short-term
changes in enrollment unrelated to new development approvals can
and do occur, and that students enrolling in their assigned school will
be accepted consistent with the School District's constitutional
obligations regardless of the utilization levels at the assigned school
effective and the amended interlocal agreement is fully executed No
level of service standard shall be amended without showing that the
amended level of service standard is financially feasible and can be
achieved and maintained within the five years of the capital facilities
plan.
BiECTIVE 2.2: Sebool Coxrumncv Senna Arrar. The Cite shall establish School
Concurren" Service Areas as the area within which an evaluation is made of whether
adequate school c pad� is available based on the adopted level of service standard Maps f
the School Concurrency Service Areas me adopted in the Volusia County Interlocal
Agreement for Public School Facilities Planning_
Policy 2.2.1: The concurrence service area for elementary schools shall be the
elementary school attendance boundary as represented on the map
series "Public School Facilities Element Elementary School
Concurtency Service Areas" adapted as part of the Volusia County
Comprehensive Plan and which is incorporated herein by reference
Policy 2.22 The concurrence service area for middle schools shall be the middle
school attendance boundary as tepresented on the map series "Public
School Facilities Element Middle School Concuxteecv Service Areas"
adopted as part of the Volusia County Comprehensive Plan and
which is incorporated herein by reference
Policy 2.2.3: The concurrence service area for K-8 schools shall be the attendance
boundary as represented on the map serried "Public School Facilities
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Element K-8 Concurtency Service Areas" adopted as part of the
Volusia County Comprehensive Plan and which is incorporated
herein by reference. (Note: no K-8 schools have been established at
this time.
Comprehensive Plan and which is incorporated herein by reference.
Policy 2.2.5: The concurrmcy service area for special use schools shall be district
wide.
Policy 2.2.6: The concurrency service area maps designate three areas where
school capacity is not anticipated for the plannhtgperiod.
Policy 2.2.7: Amendments to the School Concutrencv Service Areas shall be
completed according to the procedures specified in the Volusia
County Interlocal Agreement for School Facilities Planning
Amendments to concuxtency service areas shall consider the
following criteria:
1. Adopted level of service standards shall not exceed the level of
service standard within the initial five-year planning period
2. The utilization of school capacity is maximized to the Greatest
extent possible taking into account transportation costs. court
approved desegregation plans, proximity to schools. ethnic and
socio-economic diversity. subdivisions and neighborhoods,
demographic changes. future land development pattems. crossing
guard availability and other relevant factors
site plans to msure adNuate school capacity is available consistent with the adopted level of
service standards for public schools.
Policy 2.3.1: School concurrence applies to residential development not otherwise
exempt as specified by Policy 2.3.3.
Policy 2.3.2: Development orders may be issued for residential development
where:
X-40
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
1. Adequate school capacity. as determined by the School Board,
exists or will be under construction for each level of school in the
affected concurrency service area within three years after the
issuance of the development order allowine the residential
development.
Adequate school facilities, as determined by the School Board.
are available within an adjacent concurrency service area sub ect
to the limitations of Policy 2.37. Where capacity from an
adjacent concurrency service area or areas is utilized. the impacts
of development shall be shifted to that area. If capacity exists in
more than one concurrency service area or school within a
concurrency service area. the School District shall determine
where the impacts of development shall be allocated based on the
School District policies for student assignment.
3. The developer executes a legate binding commitment with the
School Board and City to provide mitigation proportionate to the
demand for ublic school facilities to be created by the actual
development of the property as provided by Objective 2.4 and its
supporting policies.
Policy 2.3.3, The following residential development shall be considered exempt
from the school concmrency requirements:
1. Single family lots of record existing as such at the time School
Concurrency implementing ordinance is adopted which otherwise
would be entitled to build, shall be exempt from School
Concurrency requirements.
2. Any residential development or any other development with a
residential component that received approval of a Final
Development Order or Functional Equivalent prior to the
implementation date of school concurrency or i exel�att!-&erw
otherwise vested
eaeeliewa is considered vested for that c mp n nt
which was previously approved for construction and shall not be
considered as proposed new residential development for
purposes of school conctuxency.
3. Amendments to residential development approvals. which do not
increase the number of students generated by the development
based on the student generation tates for each school type as
determined by the School District.
X-01
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
4. Age restricted developments that are subject to deed restrictions
prohibiting the permanent occupancy by a resident under the age
of fifty-five. Such deed restrictions must be recorded and be
irrevocable for a period of at least thin Rears.
5. Group quarters that do not generate students including
residential facilities such as jails, prisons, hospitals, bed and
breakfast hotels and motels, temporary emergency shelters for
the homeless, adult halfway houses. firehouse dorms, college
dorms exclusive of marred student housing, and religious non -
youth facilities.
projects to the School Board as part of the annual planning
coordination process established by the interlocal agreement and
these units shall be included by the School Board in planning student
allocations by school.
agreement.
Policv 2.3.6: The School Board shall conduct a concurrencv review that includes
findings and recommendations of whether there is adequate capacity
to accommodate ptopOSed development for each type of school
within the affected concurrency service area consistent with the
adopted level of service. The School Board may issue a certificate of
school concurrency if sufficient capacity exists for the proposed
development or the School Board may set forth conditions required
to satisfy the requirements of school concurrency including
proportionate share tnjtigation.
Policv 2.3.7: If the adopted level of service standard cannot be met within a
particular concurrency service area as applied to an application for
development order and if the needed capacity is available in one or
more contiguous service areas or school attendance zones, then this
cap_auty shall be applied to the concurrency evaluation of the
application for development approval subject to the following
limitations:
X-42
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
1. Areas established for diversity at schools shall not be considered
contiguous.
2. Concmrency service areas or school attendance zones gmetating
excessive transportation costs shall not be considered contiguous
Excessive transportation costs me defined as transporting
students beyond the abutting school attendance zone or requiting,
a transport time of fifty minutes one way as determined by
School District transportation routing staff.
3. Concutrency service areas or school attendance zones shall not
be considered contiguous when the conc=mcy service areas or
school attendance zones me sepmated by a natural or man-made
barrier sucb as a river, water body, or interstate highway that
requires indirect transport of students through a third
conc=ency service area or school attendance zone.
4. When capacity in an adjacent concurrenry service area or school
attendance zone is allocated to a development application.
assignment of the students to the school with available capacity
may be accomplished by applying any of the techniques used to
establish school attendance zones including modification of
existing attendance zone boundaries or creation of island zones
5. Student transportation not in conformance with the conditions
established in items 1 through 4 above shall be permitted to allow
student assignments based on specific educational programming
options: to comply with State and Federal mandatory transfer
opportunities: or for other transfer oppornmities that School
Board shall deem appropriate fox the specific circumstances of an
individual student.
1s y 2.3.8: If the adopted level of service cannot be met within a particular
concurrenry service uea the School Board may_apply one or more of
the following techniques to maximize use of available capaciaty and
provide for adequate numbers of student stations to meet current
and future demand:
1. Construct new school facilities
2. Construct additions to current facilities
3. Adjust program assignments to schools with available capacity
XA3
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
4. Modify attendance boundaries to assjo students to schools with
available capacity
5. Elin to variances to overcrowded facilities that are not
otherwise restticted by State or Federal requirements.
rD ogn=.
Policy 2.4.1: In the event that sufficient school capawy is not available in the
affected concurrency service area, the developer shall have the option
to propose proportionate share mitigation to address the impacts of
the proposed development.
Po 1gy 2.4.2: Mitigation shall be directed toward a permanent capacity
improvement identified in the School Board's fnmcially feasible
work progtam. which satisfies the demands created by the proposed
development consistent with the adopted level of service standards.
and shall be assured by a leggy binding development agreement
between the School Board. the City. and the applicant which shall be
executed ptior to the Cit3r issuance of the subdivision or site plan
approval. If the School Board agrees to the mitigation. the School
Board shall commit in the agreement to placing the imrrovement
required for mitigation in its work plan.
Policy 2.4.4: The applicant's total proportionate share obligation shall be based on
multi�lyi� the number of needed smdent stations generated from
the proposed project times the School Board's current cost pek
student station plus land cost for each type of school. The
applicant's ro ortionate sbare mitigation obligation shall be credited
toward any impact fee or enaction fee imposed by local ordinance for
the same need on a dollar for dollar basis. (For example. if the
proportionate share mitigation provides only for land, the credit is
applied only against that portion of the impact fee or other exaction
devoted to land costs.)
X44
2007-&18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
following:
1. Donation of buildings for use as a primary or altenudve learning
Eaffity
2. Renovation of existing buildings for use as leaching facilities
3. Funding dedicated to. or construction of permanent student
stations or core capacity
4. For schools contained in the School Boud's adopted five -yea facilities work nrogam. upon agreement with the School
Board, the applicant may build the school in advance of the time
set forth in the five-year work nroerahr
5. Dedication of a school site as approved by the School Board
6. Un front lump sum payment of school impact fees
7. Up front payment of interest and other costs of bonowing
8. Payment of off -site infrastructure expenses including but not
limited to roads, water, and/or sewer improvements
9. Payment of tcansportadon costs associated with the movement of
students as a result of overcapacity school
10. Funding assistance with acquisidon of school site
11. Phasing of construction or delay of construction in order to
timely plan for the availability of school capacity,
12. Establishment of an educational facilities benefit district
13. Establishment of educational facilities mitigation banks
X-45
2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
OBJECTIVE 2.5, CQLztal Faei4kes PlanninEThe City shall ensure existing deficiencies and
future needs are addressed consistent with the adopted level of service standuds for schools
facilities plan.
Policy 2.5.2, The City shall ensute that future development, pus a proportionate
share of the costs of capital facilities capac4 needed to
accommodate new development and to assist in maintaining the
adopted level of service standazds via impact fees and other leggy
available and appropriate methods
X-46
2007-0-18
C
0
Halifax North
Halifax Central
Halifax South
Southeast
Northwest
West
Southwest
2011-2025 Long Range
Planned Public School Facilities
By School Planning Areas
�)v 2 Elementary Schools
_ _ _ 1 Elementary School
y
Elememary School 1 High School
1
2 Elementary Schools
1 Middle School
SR iOW
Ugh W rOM
°s eo�N�e fnvloa Fn 2 Elementary Schoolsl
�� pF
1 Mitltlle School J
e
$R" 1e7H Si
2 Elementary Schoo1S SR 4e2 EX7 w
1 Middle School
1 Elementary School r
1 High School JI
� c
R9if{2lOpylf
e
0 17,50035,000 70,000 105,000 140,000
Feet
N
S
CmW by Fedltlies Services
June 2007
EXHIBIT "A"
City of Edgewater
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
CHAPTER IX— CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................1
A. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS INVENTORY..................................................................2
1. Needs Derived from Other Elements............................................................................2
2. Existing Financial Resources........................................................................................4
B. FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS AND LOANS......................................................... 10
C. LOCAL POLICIES AND PRACTICES........................................................................... 13
D. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS.................................................................................................. 18
E. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES.......................................................................28
MANAGEMENT
A. PUBLIC FACILITIES, CAPACITIES AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE INVENTORY
FOR CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT.......................................................................
I
1. Transportation...............................................................................................................1
2. Sanitary Sewer................................................................................................................1
3. Potable Water.................................................................................................................1
4. Solid Waste Disposal......................................................................................................2
5. Stormwater Drainage.....................................................................................................2
6. Recreation And Open Space..........................................................................................2
B. CONCURRENCY ASSESSMENT....................................................................................3
L Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, and Potable Water Facilities ..........................3
2. Parks and Recreation Facilities.....................................................................................4
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
3. Transportation Facilities................................................................................................4
C. GENERAL RULES FOR CONCURRENCY ASSESSMENT..........................................5
1.
Existing Deficiencies.....................................................................................................5
2.
Approved Impacts..........................................................................................................5
3.
Phasing...........................................................................................................................5
4.
Time Specific Approval..................................................................................................6
5.
Additional Information..................................................................................................6
6. Transportation
7. Sanitary Sewer................................................................................................................6
8. Potable Water.................................................................................................................7
9. Solid Waste.....................................................................................................................7
10. Storrawater Drainage
11. Recreation
7
7
D. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES.........................................................................8
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 — Capital Improvements Schedule
Table 2 — Revenue Projections Affecting Capital Improvements
Table 3 — Expenditure Projection for Scheduled Capital Improvements
Table 4 — Debt Service Expenditure Projections
Table 5 — Annual Operating Expenditures
Table 6 — Fiscal Assessment No. 1
Table 7 — Fiscal Assessment No. 2
Table 8 — Five -Year Schedule of Improvements
Table CM-1 — Level -of -Service Standards
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 — Federal Grant Agencies and Program Titles
LIST OF MAPS
IX-n
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Map IX-1 — General Location of Capital Improvements
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the Capital Improvements Element is to evaluate the need for public facilities as
identified in other Elements of this Plan. In addition, the Capital Improvements Element will
present an analysis of the fiscal capability of the City to fund needed public facilities, recommend
financial policies to guide the funding of those identified improvements, and to schedule the funding
and construction of improvements in a manner necessary to ensure that capital improvements me
provided when required.
Needed capital improvements me those which me necessary to meet the adopted level of service
standards identified in other elements of this Plan. The City of Edgewater public facilities which
require identification and funding are:
• Transportation — Roadways which are under the jurisdiction of the City, and those roadways
which the City wishes to aid in funding improvements.
• Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element — Sanitary sewer treatment and effluent disposal facilities
necessary to serve the existing and future population of the City. In addition,
recommendations for capital improvements and policies to ensure adequate sanitary sewer
collection facilities.
• Solid Waste -Sub Element — Solid waste disposal facilities to service the City's existing and
future population, coordination with Volusia County to ensure those facilities are available
when needed, and recommendations for adequate solid waste collection methods.
• Drainage Sub -Element — Drainage systems necessary to meet recommended level of service
standards for storrawater quality and conveyance and coordination with Volusia County for
improvements to systems in basins which serve the City but are outside its jurisdiction.
• Potable Water Sub — Element — Potable water treatment facilities necessary to service the
existing and future population of the City. In addition, recommendations for capital
improvements and policies to ensure adequate potable water delivery facilities.
• Recreation/Open Space Element — Recreation facilities and land areas necessary to meet the
recommended level of service standards.
The capital improvements element will also present methods to ensure "concurrency" as defined
and required in Chapter 9J-5.003 and 9J-5.016, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The Element
will also present methods to monitor the "concurrency management system" as defined and
required in Chapter 9J-5.003 and 9J-5.0055, F.A.C.
IX-1
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
A. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS INVENTORY
1. Needs Derived from Other Elements
The analysis documented in the preceding comprehensive plan elements have identified facility
improvements needed to meet the existing service deficiencies and those needed to meet the
demands of future growth.
The geographic service areas and locations were identified for major public education and public
health system components. System components whose service areas include the City of Edgewater
ate identified in the fist in Table 1. The public education system is operated by the Volusia County
School Board, and the public health systems are operated by the Volusia County Health
Department.
The Volusia County School Board presently bases its needs assessments on the findings of the
Education Plan Sunny, prepared every five yens by the State Department of Education in accordance
with Florida Statutes. The last survey was completed in late 1999. The results of this survey
indicated a need for a new middle school to be built in the City of Edgewater. The School Board,
based on this report, has acquired a site for this facility along S.R. 442 in the southwestern section of
the City, which is expected to begin development in approximately five (5) years. The remainder of
the existing educational facilities were noted as being in excellent or good condition and were
adequately served by roadways, sanitary sewer, solid waste, stortnwater drainage, potable water and
recreation facilities.
The State Department of Children and Families (DCF) determines the need for new health care
facilities with a formula based on occupancy rates, historic use by age group, and population
projections by age group. Although Edgewater currently has no full -service hospitals, there is Bert
Fish Medical Center located just outside the corporate City limits that serves the Edgewater area.
Based on growth forecasts a hospital will not be needed before 2020.
Individual Capital Improvement needs identified in this element are, for the most part, those
improvements which cost $25,000 or more and are generally non -recurring purchase items. The
capital improvements identified in the other elements of this Comprehensive Plan are fisted with a
brief description in Table 1 along with their estimated costs, funding source, and projected yen of
expenditure. The improvements are listed by type of service, related to the various elements of the
Comprehensive Plan. As required by Section 9)-5.016, F.A.C., the Capital Improvements Element
addresses existing and future capital improvements needed for at least the first five fiscal years after
the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, Table 2 lists improvements identified for the
yens 2001- 2006.
IX-2
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
TABLE EK-1
City of Edgewater
Capital Improvement Schedule
Fiscal Years Endine 2002-2006
CAVERAL:
New city Flan
$
500,000
$
2,","
$ 2,5U0,000
Cenerd To Ws
S
500,000
$
2,000,000
$ 2,M),000
PUBLIC SAFETY: (FlceRe¢,R)
Ieatemue
$ 238,M3
s
260,837
s 499,540
ALS Aplmmma m new Mad.
s
Mow
s
IN,"
f 390,000
R l Batt 57
$
32,40o
$ 32,400
R lace Miltuy Brush Tmrk
1
M,413
s M,413
R kce Uali S Tmuk
$
29,M5
$ 29,705
Pudic Safety Table
a -
1 238,N3
S
26ZI05
$
274,413
$
2W,837
s 1,031458
DRAINAGE:
Can city Stumwakr M®a tSyaem Anal m
a ad lmpovemmt Study
$ 120,000
S 120,000
1m1®rnmli90 Mimpovainda in Stamwete Matte Play
$ 75,"
$
75,010
$
75, 0
$
75,0D0
S 300,000
C�' wG dysyrs Chaco m
S
1M,0D0
S
IN,"
$ 360,M
Mammm ern' saucme m Ith St Charnel El
f 51M
$ 5,000
$
5,000
$
5,000
$
5,000
s 25,000
Mammm existm swctme m IN, St Chanel FA
$ 5,000
s S,M
$
51"
$
5,000
$
51000
$ 25,000
Mammm mMu,swcaae I I M st Chemed a
$ 51010
$ 5,000
$
5,M
$
5,000
S
5,000
s 25,000
D To ,
$ 133,M
s %,000
s
W010
s
27Q000
$
2M,000
$ M5,000
SANITARY SEWER:
WIF Rrsmimd Wme t,
1 $ 2,OOM00
S 2,000,000
Weuau Svvice Atce Collecriao & Tmnvaixi90 System
a 775,000
a ns,two
Conduct
$ Impoo
s Im'"
s
Im,00
s
Im"
$
100p00
$ St IM
S Sewar Taml
$ 100,MD
S 2,875,ODD
$
Im"
s
IDD,000
s
100,010
$ 3,215,000
POTABLE WATER:
New Wells
f
350,000
f 350,000
SR442Waters ern
$ 750,000
s ]SO,ODD
Soulheo seviceam smm mot
$
500,000
$ SOD,000
Pobde Wm. Toud
s ]SOp00
$ -
S
350,000
S
5mow
s
-
S 1,600,000
PARKS & RECREATION:
� Besebell5oflbell fiedsMawks Pads
S 500m
1 500,000
Cmehue �llawks Pek
f 25,gp
1 25,000
C rm�a l
1 45,0M
s 45,000
RmovRe and rnotaiet soae kxI
s 75,000
S
75,000
s I50,000
Pmchaemod for
S 450,000
s 450,000
Dzvel culmal andafiaemm Pah
$ 2 ,oco
$ 2.50,000
Pmchese kod f0f lN"R park
1 1001000
$ Im'"
$
150,000
S 350,000
Daryl nature
$
200,DDD
$ 200000
Rmowaan ofKem� Pmk
S
375,000
S
375,000
S 750,000
Addiaooalhet rater-MamrdMryPack
$
150,=
$ 150,000
Pa and Reereadon To
S 1,120,000
S 425,000
S
225,000
S
3]5,000
s
]25,000
S 2,8]0,000
AIIPro'eem T9mle$
2,IK80
S 3,625,'!03
S
1,02],105
$
1,519AM
S
1,M5,837
S 9,636,m8
Spume: City ofFdaewakr Plamina Divisie.2001
IX-3
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Each capital improvement project is described briefly in Table 2. In addition, the reason for the
project is identified (i.e. replacement or new construction), and estimated total project cost is
provided. For ease of review, the projects have been grouped by facility type. As indicated, capital
improvement projects have been identified for general, public safety, sanitary sewer, potable water,
drainage, parks and recreation, and transportation facilities. It should be noted that the projects in
Table 2 include capital improvements mentioned in the Infrastructure Element of the City's CP
which were not finalized at the time this element was completed (September, 1988). These projects
include the paving and drainage improvements to be conducted in the Florida Shores area, a
wastewater Reuse Distribution System for effluent disposal, Florida Shores Water System
Improvements for fire protection, and Western Water Treatment Plant/Wellfield Land Acquisition
costs.
It should be noted that the capital improvement projects contained in Table 1 are not inclusive of all
the anticipated capital expenditures by the City during the planning period. Table 1 is limited only to
those major components identified by the preceding elements of the City's CP in order to analyze
development impacts and trends at a level of detail which is both manageable and fairly accurate.
The cost estimates for the capital improvements indicated in this element were developed using
standard engineering practice regarding construction costs, in conjunction with information derived
from actual construction costs of similar projects, certified bid documents on similar projects, and
engineering cost estimates conducted on similar projects.
Existing Financial Resources
The fast step in planning capital improvements, as well as arranging the necessary financing through
the budgeting process, is to inventory the major sources of funding available to the City. These
major sources of funding are expected to contribute a total revenue sum of $8,553,327 in fiscal year
2001. The revenue sources fisted below comprises a working inventory for which the City's ability
to fund the needed capital improvements will be assessed. In addition, the current status of each
revenue source currently used by the City is indicated. It is important to note that the list below
includes all of the major financial resources available to the City and is not limited to the funds
which will be used for the capital improvement projects identified in the 5-year Schedule of
Improvements included in this element. These currently utilized financial resources comprise, in
part, the revenue sources which will be used to fund the identified capital improvements projects.
Local Revenue Sources
Property Taxes (Ad Valorem). Property taxes are normally based on a millage rate (i.e. one mill
equates to $1 per $1000 of assessed value, or .10/n) which is then applied to the taxable value of all
real property, as well as all other tangible personal property. The revenue from ad valorem taxes
may be used to fund both operating costs and capital projects, unless prohibited by local policies.
IX-4
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Provisions at the State level exist for raising the treillage rate above the 10-mill cap set by local
referendum for debt service or provision of municipal -type services within the City.
CURRENT STATUS: As the major source of revenue for the City of Edgewater, ad valorem taxes
normally account for approximately 33.1% of the City's annual budget for the General Fund. The
City's current millage rate for the General Revenue Fund is set at approximately 5.95 trills. The
expected tax yield for fiscal year 2001 is $2,527,588 from a tax base (adjusted taxable value) of
$442,505,001. A level of assessment of 96% is currently used by the City.
Public Utility or User Charges
The revenue from these charges is generated primarily as a result of the rates
charged to City residents of utilization of City -owned utilities such as water,
sewer, drainage, and solid waste removal/disposal. Revenue from these
operations include met fees, miscellaneous customer service charges, and
interest income.
CURRENT STATUS: The expected public utility revenue for fiscal year 2001 is estimated to be
approximately $7,732,031.
Other taxes, fees, and charges
This category of revenue source includes special assessments, various
administrative fees, and other charges for using services or facilities owned
and operated by the City. Some examples of these charges are public
document sales, property appraisal fees, fines and forfeitures, permit and
license fees, City fund interest income, City property sale income, rental
income, and all private contributions (real estate, gifts, donations, etc) to the
City.
CURRENT STATUS: Approximately 25.3% of the City's General Food revenues me generated
from these sources. In fiscal year 2001, the sum of $2,170,338 is expected to be generated by these
fund sources.
C. Franchise Fees
The City currently charges a franchise fee (based on the applicable gross
revenues charged) for utility services which me provided by private
companies within the City. The utility service and franchise fee for each
respective type of service me: (i) Electric Service — 6%; (ii) Telephone Service
— 1%; (iii) Solid Waste Collection Service — 1%; (iv) Natural Gas Service —
6%; and (v) Cable Television Service— 3%.
IX-5
Otdin.ce No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
CURRENT STATUS: Approximately 7.9% of the City's General Fund revenues are generated
from this source. For fiscal year 2001, it is anticipated that $673,400 in revenue will be generated
from this funding source.
d. Public Service or Utility Tax
A municipality may levy a tax on the purchase of electricity, metered or
bottled gas, water, cable television, and telecommunication services. The tax
may be levied upon only the purchases within the municipality and may not
exceed ten (10) percent of the applicable payments received by the seller of
the taxable item from the purchaser of the purchase of such service.
CURRENT STATUS: The City currently charges a public service or utility tax on the previously
mentioned applicable and available utility services, with the exception of cable television services.
The City presently charges ten (10) percent of revenues for electricity, gas and water, and seven (7)
percent of revenues for telecommunications. For fiscal year 2001, the City anticipates receiving
$1,397,000 in public service or utility tax revenue, which amounts to approximately 16.3% of the
estimated General Fund revenue.
Special Source of Revenue
Additional funding mechanisms ate sometimes required due to the
availability of existing revenue sources and/or the project priorities assigned
by the City Council. The options available to the City regarding alternate
sources of revenue for funding capital improvement projects are listed below.
1. System Development of Impact fees. Fees which me charged in advance
of new development to pay for infrastructure needs, but not operating
costs, resulting directly from the new development. The fees must be
equitably allocated to the specific group(s) which directly benefit from
the capital improvements. In addition, the assessment levied must fairly
reflect the true cost of the capital improvements.
CURRENT STATUS: The City currently charges impact fees for water and wastewater services,
and for parks. Approximately $482,000 in impact fee revenues (including interest income on fund
balances) are expected to be generated during fiscal year 2001.
2. Special Assessment. Similar to impact fees, special assessments are charged to residents,
agencies or areas who directly benefit from the provision of a new service or facility by
the City. For example, the construction of a gravity sewer system for an existing
neighborhood may be financed through a special assessment to the neighborhood's
individual homeowners rather than through a revenue fund of the City. The
IX-6
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
new sewer system through a (.try
revenue source is not considered equitable.
CURRENT STATUS: The City currently has two special assessments in the Florida Shores area,
one for sewer, and one for paving. The sewer assessment was started in November 1992 and the
paving assessment was started in November 1994. The long-term debt service associated with the
special assessment bonds is summarized below:
General Stormwater SRF Water and Sewer Fund
2001 -
$911,370
$376,813
$1,811,438
2002 -
$911,370
$376,813
$1,811,438
2003 -
$911,370
$376,813
$1,811,438
2004 -
$911,370
$376,813
$1,811,438
2005 -
$911,370
$376,813
$1,811,438
2006 -
$911,370
$376,813
$1,811,438
Borrowing. Occasionally, many local governments are required to resort to
borrowing funds to pay for capital improvements due to their extremely high
cost. Usually, either long-term or short-term financing is used to provide these
funds. The short-term financing option is normally handled by local banks and
is used to raise the required revenue for periods of one to five years. The more
customary method is to authorize long-term bond issues, which range in length
from five to thirty years. Listed below are several types of bond issues available
to the City.
General Obligation Bonds. These are bonds which me
backed by the full faith and credit of the local government,
and are required to be approved by a voter referendum.
Since these bonds me secured by the taxing power of
government, they generally offer lower interest rates than
other bonds. The revenues collected from ad valorem taxes
on real estate, as well as other sources of revenue are used to
service the government's debt. General obligation bonds
should be used to fund capital improvements which benefit
the whole City rather than specific areas or groups of citizens.
CURRENT STATUS: The City currently has no outstanding general obligation bonds.
ii. Revenue Bonds. Revenue bonds, unlike general obligation
bonds are financed directly benefiting from the capital
IX-7
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
improvement. The revenue obtained from the issuance of
these bonds is normally used to finance publicly owned
facilities such as water treatment and wastewater treatment
facilities. The charges collected from the users of the
facilities are used directly to retire the bond obligations. This
basically allows the capital project to be self-supporting. It
should be noted that the interest rates generally tend to be
higher than those of general obligation bonds. Also, the
issuance of the bonds may be approved by the City Council
without a voter referendum.
CURRENT STATUS: The City has issued several revenue bonds to fund the improvements to its
water and wastewater facilities. The bond revenues are deposited into Enterprise Trust Fund
accounts for each of the utilities, from which funds are specifically earmarked for a particular
project. User charges are then used to service the debt. The total annual debt service on these
bonds is as follows:
2001 -
$1,067,687
2002 -
$1,066,813
2003 -
$1,068,262
2004-
$1,068,328
2005 -
$1,068,060
2006 -
$1,068,060
Total
$6,407,210
iu. Industrial Revenue Bonds. This type of bond, though issued
by a local government, is actually assumed by companies or
industries which use these funds to construct facilities. The
low interest rates associated with this type of bond (due to
their tax exempt status) makes it particularly attractive to
industry. The advantages to the local government is that the
private sector is responsible for the retirement of the debt
and that the new employment opportunities are created in the
community.
CURRENT STATUS: The City has not issued any Industrial Revenue Bonds.
STATE SOURCES
The City of Edgewater also depends on annual disbursements from state government to supplement
its revenue sources. The revenue sources discussed above represent those funds generated by City
levies which may be collected and disbursed at the local level. The revenue sources discussed in this
M.
Ordi..ce No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
section represent those funds which are: (1) generated locally, but collected and later reimbursed to
the City by the State; (2) adopted as a local option tax or license fee, collected and reimbursed by the
State; or (3) shared by the State in the form of grants to the local government, but originate from
State general revenues. The amounts available from these sources may vary widely from year to year
depending on legislative actions.
Revenue Sharing Trust Fund
This component of revenue consists of 1.075 percent of sales and use tax collections,
12.5 percent of the state alternative fuel use decal fee collections, and the remainder
from the one -cent municipal fuel tax. The sales and use tax collections were substituted
for the cigarette tax revenues that previously were used for this fund by the Florida
Legislature. The municipal fuel tax funds are restricted for transportation related
expenditures.
CURRENT STATUS: The City anticipates receiving $425,000 from this revenue source in the fiscal
year 2001. Of this revenue, 63.8% comes from the sales and use tax collections, .4 percent comes
from the user decal fee collections, and the remainder (35.80/.) is generated by the one -cent
municipal fuel tax. This revenue source is anticipated to account for approximately 4.9% of the
City's General Fund revenues in fiscal year 2001.
b. Other Shared Revenue
This category of revenue sources includes several major financial resources which, like
the Revenue Sharing Trust Fund, are shared between City, County, and State agencies.
The following taxes and licensing fees generate a large portion of the total annual
revenue for the City's General Fund.
1. Sales Tax — The current sales tax in the State is 6%, and is levied on retail sales, and such things
as commercial rentals, admission fees to entertainment facilities, and motor vehicle sales.
9.718% (effective July 1, 2000) of the collection is returned to the Cities and Counties in
accordance with specific formulae. The variables of the formulae, in the case of cities, include
the population of the municipality, as well as the total and unincorporated population of the
County.
CURRENT STATUS: The City's portion of the State sales tax is expected to amount to
approximately $850,000 in fiscal year 2001, which represents 9.9% of the City's General Fund
revenue budget for that year.
2. Mobile Home Licenses — Mobile Home licenses currently range from $20 to $80, depending on
what time length is established in the rate structure. Each City shares in the allocation of the
revenues form this source based on the number of units located in the City. The City in turn
shares a portion of the revenue with the local school board. This has proven to be a relatively
stable revenue source over time.
IX-9
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
CURRENT STATUS: The City's share of this revenue source estimated for fiscal year 2001
amounts to approximately $23,000 which represents less than 1% of the General Fund revenue
budget.
c. Local Option Taxes
Currently, there are four (4) possible sources of revenue available to the City within this
category. All of the funds are generated locally, but the funds are collected and
disbursed by the Florida Department of Revenue. The City currently shares in only one
(1) of these revenue sources.
CURRENT STATUS: The City's share of this revenue source estimated for fiscal year 2001 is
approximately $423,000 which amounts to 4.9% of the City's 2001 General Fund revenues.
d. Alcoholic Beverage License
The Division of Beverages for the State of Florida administers the issuance of licenses
associated with the sale and/or consumption of alcoholic beverages. The State collects
in excess of $37 million annually from this fee. Of this amount, a portion is returned to
counties and municipalities as a state shared revenue.
CURRENT STATUS: The City's share of this revenue source is anticipated to amount to
approximately $9,000 in fiscal year 2001 which is less than 1% of the City's General Fund revenues.
e. Other Sources of Shared Revenues. The City also receives other shared revenues from
both the County and other government agencies. These revenues include the Motor
Fuel Tax Rebate, the Federal Excise Tax, and the County Occupational License fees.
CURRENT STATUS: The City's share of these revenues for the fiscal year 2001 are anticipated to
amount to:
a. Motor Fuel Tax Rebate: $9,000
b. County Occupational License Fees: $21,000
The sum of these revenue sources amounts to less than 1% of the City's fiscal year 2001 General
Fund revenues.
B. FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS AND LOANS
The system by which federal general revenue sharing was formerly provided (U.S. State and Local
Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972) has been substantially modified. The federal funds are now available
through allocations to the state agencies which administer and monitor block grants or disbursed by
IX-10
Otdinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
federal agencies as block grants directly to state and local agencies, as well as other eligible
organizations and individuals. The purpose of the block grants program is to allow recipients
greater freedom in the actual funds, though the funds must still be used for projects in specific
categories. Since these funds require the competitive applications be submitted in order to receive
an allocation, the grant monies are usually non -recurring and cannot accurately be projected for
annual budgeting purposes.
A partial list of available federal grant sources is shown in Figure 1. Other grants and loans are
administered at the state level, with state executive departments acting as "pass -through agencies"
for federally fimded projects. The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) is an example of
a federally funded grant project. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
administers this program and allocates 70% of its CDBG funds to "entitlement communities", or
the larger urban areas. These communities must apply for grants for financing specific projects
from a list of eligible activities outlined in Tide I statutes. These projects include infrastructure
improvements, housing projects, and commercial revitalization. The remaining 30% of the grant
funds are allocated to state pass -through agencies such as the Department of Community Affairs
(DCA) in the State of Florida. DCA administers these grants for the same types of projects
mentioned previously, but restricts their availability to small cities and counties.
In addition to block grants, there are several direct loan programs available at the federal level, but
their applicability to capital projects is extremely limited. State loans however, are usually available
to finance capital projects such as land acquisition for low-income housing. DCA administers loans
and grants for these projects to eligible governments through its Bureau of Housing.
CURRENT STATUS: The City has received a loan from the Florida Department of Environmental
Regulation (DER) under the Sate Revolving Loan Program for funding wastewater infrastructure
improvements. The City has received $25,809,428 in low interest loans to fund wastewater
treatment plant improvements, collection facilities, and dechlorination facilities.
Additionally, the City has received a grant from the FRDAP in the amount of $150,000 for the
Edgewater Park Ballfield Expansion as well as a grant from HUD in the amount of $277,000 for
improvements to upgrade the Southeast Volusia YMCA to a shelter.
Finally, in conjunction with the 1988 Solid Waste Management Act (SWMA), Volusia County
received a State grant for conducting and promoting a recycling program. The County allocated a
portion of these funds to each participating municipality based on population. The City's portion of
the Volusia County Recycling and Education Grant amounted to $6,905 for fiscal year 2001.
IX-11
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
FIGURE 1
FEDERAL GRANT AGENCIES AND PROGRAM TITLES
AGENCY
TITLE
Department of Commerce
Public Works and Development Facilities
Support for Planning Organizations
Public Works Impact Projects
Public Telecommunications Facilities
Construction and Planning
Department of Children & Families
Community Health Concerns
Department of Housing and Urban
Development
Housing Development Grants
Community Development Block
Grant/Entitlement
Community Development Block
Grant/Small Cities Program
Department of Interior
Outdoor Recreation: Acquisition,
Development, and Planning
Urban Park and Recreation and Recovery
Program
Department of Transportation
Urban Mass Transportation Capital
Improvement Grants
Urban Mass Transportation Technical
Studies Grant
Environmental Protection
State Revolving Loan Fund (DFR) Program
Agency
Comprehensive Estuarine Management
SOURCE: "Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance", Government Printing office, Washington,
D.C.
IX-12
0edw.ce No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
C. LOCAL POLICIES AND PRACTICES
To guide the location and turfing of land development, local policies and practices are used,
particularly in support of the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Element.
Obviously, state agencies and water management districts which provide public facilities within the
City's jurisdiction may influence these policies and practices. One such influence was found to be
generated by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) 5-year Transportation Plan. This
influence stemmed from the fact that several roadways within the City's jurisdiction are part of the
state highway system, and therefore are largely the financial responsibility of the FDOT. Plans for
the improvement of some of these roadways may be included in the before mentioned 5-year
Transportation Plan. However, there are other such roadways not included in the plan. Either
scenario affects the capacity of the roadways, which in rum affects the level and intensity of
development, as well as the degree of financial commitment for which the City must plan.
In the absence of improvement plans by FDOT, special provisions may be made when the City
desires improvement of a state road to maintain local levels of service standards. These provisions
may include the City expending funds for roadway improvements or providing FDOT with the
funds, either of which may be collected through an impact fee.
In this section, many of the local practices and policies used by the City are described in terms of
their general concept and the circumstances surrounding their use. The policies and practices both
used in the past and currently in use are identified. Policies and practices not in use which have the
potential for being used by the City are discussed in a later section of the CIE.
Level of Service Standards. Level of Service (LOS) standards indicate the degree of
service provided, or proposed to be provided by public facilities based on their
operational characteristics. Basically, the LOS indicates the capacity per unit of
demand for each public facility. Therefore, the LOS is a summary of the existing or
desired public facility conditions. Chapter 163, F.S., and Chapter 9J-5, F.A.C., both
require LOS standards to be included for all public facilities addressed by local
governments in their CP. These LOS standards are to be established for the specific
purpose of issuing permits or development orders to ensure that adequate capacity is
available and will be maintained in public facilities for future development.
LOS standards can effect both the timing and location of development by
encouraging development of those areas which have public facilities with excess
capacity. In addition, development is not allowed unless the needed facilities and
services are available. This development and provision of services usually occur in a
phased sequence over a period of titre.
IX-13
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
CURRENT STATUS: The City has adopted formal LOS standards with the completion of their
CP. Therefore, the LOS standards as outlined in the various elements of the CP have been listed
below.
Sanitary Sewer: 95 gallons per capita per day
Solid Waste:
2.75 pounds per capita per day
Drainage:
Level A — No significant street flooding
Level B — No major residential yard flooding
Level C — No significant structure flooding
Level D — No limitation on flooding
(Based on 25-year/24-hour storm event)
Potable Water:
100 gallons per capita per day
Collector Roadways:
LOS D for peak hour volumes
Arterial Roadways:
LOS D for peak hour volumes
Limited Access Road:
LOS C
Public Transit Facilities (Volusia County): In process of establishing LOS standards
Recreation Standards for Facilities:
Faci tv
Parkland
Baseball/Softball
Basketball Court
Tennis Court
Handball/Racquetball Court
Community Center
Multi-Purpose/Soccer
Shuffle Board Court
Bocci Ball Court
Volley Ball Court
Boat Ramps
Bike/Pedestrian Trail
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
Unit of Measure
5 acres/1,000 persons
1 field/4,000 persons
1 court/5,000 persons
1 court/3,500 persons
1 count/4,000 persons
1 facility/30,000 persons
1 field/4,000 persons
1 court/1,500 persons
1 court/10,000 persons
1 court/5,000 persons
1 ramp/4,700 persons
1 mile/4,000 persons
IX-14
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Fitness Trails
1/14,000 persons
Activities Center
1/15,000 persons
Gymnasium
N/A
2. Capital Improvements Program (CIP). A capital improvements program is a plan
for capital expenditures to be incurred each year over a fixed period of years to meet
anticipated facility improvements and needs. The CIP identifies each capital project
or other capital expenditures anticipated by the City, as well as presenting estimates
of the resources needed to finance the project.
The CIP is designed to be consistent with the CIE of the local CP because it reflects the
goals, objectives, and policies of the element and its implementation strategy, including the
5-year Schedule of Improvements. However, the CIP is more inclusive than the CIE
because it contains those projects of relatively small scale and low cost (i.e. less than $25,000)
which are generally recurring and don't require multi -year financing. In addition, the CIP is
not restricted to only those public facilities addressed in the CP, as is the CIE.
The time period covered by a CIP is normally 6 years, but may range up to 10 years. In
many cases, the first year of a CIP becomes the annual capital budget with longer range
capital expenditures identified for the 5-year program. The capital budget encompasses
enacting appropriations for those capital projects delineated for the first year of the CIP.
The CIP, similar to CIE, is reviewed on an annual basis.
CURRENT STATUS: The City is currently preparing a CIP with 5-year increments, within which
are contained annual capital budgets.
Impact Fees. Impact fees are imposed by many local governments on new
developments to offset the costs of new public facilities necessitated by the
development. Local government may use this strategy as one method of
implementing the CIE. Chapter 163, F.S. includes impact fees as an innovative
technique that may be integrated into the land development regulations.
Impact fee development is a logical outgrowth of the CIE preparation. A rational
basis for developing an impact fee ordinance comes from the assessment of the local
government's capital improvement needs and its capability to provide for those
needs which is required by Chapter 9J-5, F.A.C.
Infill development location and timing may be affected and controlled through the
use of impact fees. This is because infill development usually occurs in those areas
having capital facilities with excess capacity. If the local government chooses not to
recover the costs of capital facilities in undemtilized service areas, infill development
IX-15
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
may be encouraged by the absence of impact fees on developments proposed within
those areas.
CURRENT STATUS: The City currently has impact fee ordinances for providing water, wastewater
and recreation services. Additionally, as of April 1, 2001 the City will require impact fees for Fire
and Rescue services.
4. Urban Service Areas. The delineation of urban service areas within a comprehensive
plan or CIP may be used to describe mesa where local governments intend to
provide public facilities and services. When used in conjunction with a CIE and
CIP, urban service areas can be used as a tool to coordinate the timing of public
facilities and service provision within areas planned for development.
Additionally, the following benefits may be the result of using urban service areas:
1. Encourage efficient and orderly growth patterns;
2. Preserve agricultural and environmentally sensitive areas; and
3. Support control on facility extensions
CURRENT STATUS: Urban service area have been included in the Utilities Element of the City's
CP, but only for water and wastewater facilities and services.
5. User Charges and Connection Fees. User charges are designed to recover the costs
of public facilities or services form those who benefit from them. Many areas of
local government employ the use of user charges. Monthly sewer charges paying for
the operation and maintenance of wastewater facilities as well as retiring debt service
on revenue bonds is a good example of user charge usage. This technique may also
be applied to transportation, potable water, solid waste, recreation, and parking
facilities and services.
These charges may be designed to vary, depending on the quantity and location of
the services rendered, in order to affect the pace and pattern of development. In
other words, the greater the distance from the service area, the higher the user
charge.
CURRENT STATUS: User charges and connection fees we currently used for wastewater, potable
water, solid waste, and recreation facility maintenance.
6. Concurrency Management System. This controls the timing and location of
development by conditioning new development approvals on evidence that sufficient
facilities and services are present or will be provided in order to maintain adopted
LOS standards. In effect, this implements the 1985 Legislative mandate (Chapter
IX-16
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
163, F.S.) that requires public facilities to be available to support the impacts of new
development. Therefore, development approval becomes contingent on the ability
of local governments to provide facilities and services, and furthermore, may require
the development itself to furnish the facilities and services in order to maintain the
adopted LOS standards. Additional benefits associated with a Concurrency
Management System are as follows:
1. Supports the consistency of the CIE with the Future Land Use Element;
2. Provides for the orderly expansion of public facilities;
3. Stabilizes capital improvement expenditures and taxing structures for capital
improvements; and
4. Reduces the possibility of damage to the environment from the use of
overburdened facilities.
Typically, the Concurrency Management System interacts with the development
approval process by requiring that all zoning, subdivision, or planned unit
development (PUD) approval be granted only upon demonstrated compliance with
the system. The building permit stage is another level at which a Concurrency
Management System may function. In this context, the Concurrency Management
System may control development in areas that are already approved, but not as yet
built on, such as pre -platted lands.
CURRENT STATUS: The City has developed a Concurrency Management System as part of this
element.
7. Mandatory Dedication or Fees in Lieu Of The City may require, as a condition to
plat approval, that subdivision developers dedicate a portion of the land within the
development to be used for public purposes such as roads, parks, and schools.
Dedication may be made to the governing body, or to a private group such as a
homeowners association.
When a subdivision is of such small scale or topographic conditions that a land
dedication cannot reasonably be required, the City may require that the subdivider
pay a fee in lieu of dedication which is equivalent to the amount of land that
otherwise would have been dedicated by the developer. The fee may be deposited
into a separate account for use in the future towards the provision of such facilities.
As a result of the public facility provision, the adjacent area benefiting from the
initiative would likely become more attractive to development. Therefore, the
acquired service potential may be used to encourage growth in desired areas.
CURRENT STATUS: The City currently requires mandatory dedications of land or fees in lieu of.
IX-17
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Moratoria. A moratorium, or stop -gap ordinance, is used to temporarily halt or
freeze development in an area for a specified period of time on an emergency basis.
The ordinance may be imposed on budding permits, development approvals, or
governmental services such as potable water connections or wastewater system
extensions and/or connections. The moratorium normally is imposed for a
"reasonable time" to allow the necessary planning activities to take place pending
comprehensive plan preparation, adoption, or amendment. The State of Florida
legal system has found development moratoria to be a valid measure of last resort in
the protection of local public health, safety, and welfare when adopted in accordance
with applicable procedures. Some other considerations in adopting a moratorium
include:
A. Determining legal stams of existing permit applications and
approvals to determine the extent of "vested rights" for those
developments approved prior to ordinance adoption;
B. Specifying the geographic extent of the moratorium (whether it
will be City wide, or limited to specific hazard areas with existing
service insufficiencies); and
C. Specifying the time frame and conditions under which the
moratorium will be imposed.
CURRENT STATUS: The City is not currently imposing any moratoria.
D. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
FISCAL ASSESSMENT
In this section, an examination is made of the City's ability to fund the capital improvements listed
in Table 1. The purpose of the examination is to determine whether sufficient revenue will be
available using the existing budgeting framework utilized by the City to fund the required
improvements at the time when they me needed.
The assessment process estimates future revenue receipts which the City will use to fund capital
improvements, then balances these revenues against the anticipated capital improvement
expenditures. Using this process, it becomes possible to quantify annual revenue surpluses and
shortfalls, thereby providing a basis for examining opportunities for financing the requited capital
improvements. The examination of these opportunities is included in the next portion of this
section, entitled "Summary and Recommendations".
IX-18
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL
In addition to the direct cost for capital improvements, this section will review the fiscal impacts of
the capital improvements identified in the other CP elements upon the actual operation of the City
departments responsible for facility management. This will include costs for additional personnel
and routing operation/maintenance activities. It should be noted that this assessment includes only
those items planned for in other CP elements.
Account= System
The accounting system employed by the City records financial transactions in individual accounts
called "funds". Records for each fund provide a complete accounting of fund assets, liabilities,
reserves, equities, revenues, and expenditures. The following is a brief description of the funds
which the City has established for capital improvement financing.
GENERAL FUND: The General Fund is the basic operating fund of the City. It accounts for all
revenues and expenditures used to finance the traditional services associated with a municipal
government which are not accounted for in other funds. These services include police and fire
protection, civil defense, emetgency rescue services, street services, parks and recreation, building
safety, general administration and any other activity for which a specific special fund has not been
created.
ENTERPRISE FUND: Enterprise Funds are established to account for the financing of self-
supporting municipal activities which render services on a user charge basis to the general public. In
the City, the water and sewer utility, refuse collection and stormwater operations are operated as
enterprise activities.
The significant characteristic of an Enterprise Fund is that the accounting system makes it possible
to determine whether the activity is operated at a profit or loss. All reports of Enterprise Funds are
self-contained. In this way, creditors, legislators, and the general public can evaluate the
performance of the municipal enterprise on the same basis as investor -owned enterprise in the same
industry.
Proiected Revenues
The City's tax base was projected to increase, assuming a 3.75% rate of growth for the adjusted
taxable value of property (including new construction), as indicated below. The City's assessment
ratio is projected to remain stable at 96%.
Tax Base not 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Adjusted
taxable
iawme $ 442,505,001 $ 459.098,939 $ 476,315,149 $ 494,176.967 $ 512.708,603 $ 531,935,176
IX-19
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
SOURCE: City of Edgewater Finance Dept.
Ad valorem tax yields were projected assuming the fiscal year 2001 rate of millage and the average
annual increase (3.759,a) in adjusted taxable value over the past five years. It should be noted that
the five-year average rate for millage amounts to a rate of 6.247 per $1,000 of taxable property value,
which is higher than the current budgeted rate of 5.95 for fiscal year 2001.
Tax Bate 2001 2002 21193 7A104 zoos 200$
"Va..
Tax
Yield Q2 sr,589 K622,373 $2,7201712 $2,822,739 $2,W8,592 $3,038,414
SOURCE: City of Edgewater Finance Dept. Assume a collection of 96% of the total ad valorem in billings.
Table 2 indicates the revenues expected to be available to the City to finance the expenditures and
capital improvements for the years 2001-2006. Revenue projections me based on past trends and
anticipated changes in funding sources. These amounts me represented in 2001 dollars.
TABLE 2
REVENUE PROJECTIONS AFFECTING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
2001 2002 2003 20D4 2005
2006
FUND
General Fund
Ad Valorem
$
2,527,589
$
2,62$373
$ 2,720,712
$ 2.822,739
$ 3,038.414
$ 3,038,414
Franchise Fees
$
673,400
$
685,185
$ 697,175
$ 709,376
$ 734.421
$ 734.421
Stale Shared Revenues
$
1,785,000
$
1,963.500
$ 2,159,850
$ 2,375,835
$ 2,874.760
$ 2,874,760
U01ity Tax
$
1,397.000
$
1,578,610
$ 1,783,829
$ 2,015,727
$ 2,573,882
$ 2.573,882
Other
$
2,170.338
$
2,387,926
$ 2.615.034
$ 2,851,052
$ 3,346,166
$ 3.346,166
Subtotal:
$
8,553,327
$
9,237,594
$ 9,976.600
$ 10,774.729
$ 12,567,643
$ 12.567,643
Enterprise Funds:
Wastewater
$
2,133,500
$
2,240,175
$
2,352,184
$
2,469,793
$
2,593,283
$
2,722,947
WW $per. Assess
$
1,850,000
$
1,8W.000
$
1,850,0D0
$
1,850,0D0
$
1,85D,000
$
1,850,000
Solid Waste
$
1.281,531
$
1,307,162
$
1,333,305
$
1.359,971
$
1,387.170
$
1,414,914
Water
$
2,92%W0
$
3,104.740
$
3.291,024
$
3,488,486
$
3.697.795
$
3,919,663
Stormwater
$
878,835
$
913.988
$
950,548
$
988,570
$
1,028,113
$
1,069,237
Net Bond Proceeds
$
2.000,000
Redaimed Water Loan
$
1p00,000
Loan
Total Revanuaa
$
29,179,520
$
27.891,251
$
29,730.262
$
31.706,277
$
33,829.775
$
361,112,047
IX-20
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
The Enterprise Fund projected revenues for each account include anticipated income from user
charges, connection fees, impact fees, assessment receipts, and customer service charges. The
revenue projections for wastewater and water user charges and connection fees are based on current
individual fee amounts (average monthly charge and connection fees) and projected total service
connections. Solid waste user charge revenue projections are based on current average monthly
charges also.
The amount shown for net bond proceeds represents the use of bond proceeds which are
anticipated to be issued for major capital projects. The amounts shown reflect the year when the
proceeds are estimated to be encumbered for the project and not he use of the proceeds deposited
in the construction fund for financing the project.
Proiected Expenditures
The projected expenditures have been separated into three categories for the purpose of this
assessment: (i) scheduled capital improvement project expenditures; (ii) capital improvement debt
service expenditures; and (iii) operating cost expenditures. The fast category of expenditure
represents the direct cost of those capital improvements expected to be incurred annually, those
identified by the other CP elements, and those identified by the City's Capital Improvements
Program (in addition to the CIP projects already identified by the other CP elements). Table 3 lists
these projected expenditures by Fund for 2001-2006.
IX-21
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
TABLE 3
EXPENDITURE PROJECTIONS FOR SCHEDULED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
FUND
General Fund
Annual Capital Expenditures $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000
CIE Projects
$
663,703
$
987.105
$
1,649,413
$
2,985,837
Enterprise Funds
Annual Capial Expenses
Wastewater
$
76,000
$
75,000
$
75,000
$
75,000
$
75,000
$
75.000
Water
$
30,000
$
30,000
$
30,000
$
30,000
$
30,000
$
30.000
Refuse
$
100.000
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
100.000
$
100,000
Stortmvater
$
20,000
$
20,000
$
20,000
$
20,000
$
20,000
$
20,000
CIE Projects
Wastewater
$
100,000
$
2,875,000
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
100,000
Water
$
750,000
$
350,000
$
500,000
Stornamter
$
135,000
$
90,000
$
90,000
$
270,000
$
270,000
$
575,000
$
810,000
$
4,953,703
$
2,102,105
$
3,094,413
$
3,930,837
The second category includes the projected expenditures required to meet debt service requirements
for outstanding bond issues, as well as planned future bond issues included in the revenue projects
in Table 2. The future debt issues are anticipated by the City to provide monies to fund the
reclaimed water improvements as well as various general improvements. In addition to long-term
indebtedness, the City utilizes short-term borrowing for minor capital expenditures. Table 4lists the
projected debt service expenditures by Fund.
TABLE 4
DEBT SERVICE EXPEDNITURE PROJECTIONS
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
FUND
General Fund
Special Assess.
$
911,370
$
911,370
$
911.370
$ 911,370
$
911,370
$
911,370
Enterprise Funds
Wastewater
State SRF Loan
$
1.811,438
$
1,811,438
$
1,811,438
$ 1,811.438
$
1.811,438
$
1,811,438
Water
Other Outstanding Debt
$
1,067,687
$
1,066,813
$
1.068,262
$ 1,068.328
$
1.068,060
$
1.066.060
Stormwater
The debt service to fund the enterprise component of the CIP program consists entirely of revenue
bonds and special assessment bonds. Based on the opinion of the City's Council, this debt does not
IX-22
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
I01.11UfiEN
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
come under the current charter provisions of the City. With respect to the general debt associated
with the General Fund, the current charter requires that the City not incur additional debt of more
than .75% of the net taxable ad valorem property value during any forward moving five (5) year
period unless such debt was approved by a referendum of eligible voters in a general election. Based
on the current Charter provisions, the estimated debt service capacity assuming assessed valuation
rates is as follows:
Value for 2001 $442,505,001
Charter Limitation at .75% $ 3,318,788
The final category of expenditures contains the annual operating costs for providing the necessary
facility improvements and services to the City's customers. These operating costs consist of the
recurring expenses associated with the normal operation of capital facilities such as supplies,
maintenance, personnel, and utility costs associated with the assessed capital improvement needs.
The operating costs have been assigned to the first year in which they are expected to be incurred
based on the schedule of improvement contained in Table 3. Table 5 presents the annual operating
expenditure of the City for years 2001-2006.
IX-23
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Table 5
ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES
Millions of Dollars
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
FUND
Geneml Fund $ 8,546,615 $ 8,973,946 $ 9,422,643 $ 9,893,775 $ 10,388,464 $ 10,907,887
Enterprise Fund
Water/Wastewater
$ 3,028,572
$ 3,210,286 $ 3.402,903 $ 3,607,078
$ 3,823,602 $ 4,052,913
Refuse
$ 1,157,521
$ 1,192,247 $ 1,228,014 $ 1,264,854
$ 1,302,800 $ 1,341,884
Stormwater
$ 422,305
$ 464,536 $ 510,989 $ 562,088
$ 618,297 $ 680,126
In order to assess the City's capability to fund the necessary capital improvement expenditures, a
determination of revenue sufficiency must be made. This capability is shown by finding the
difference between the projected annual revenues and expenditures for each fund the City uses to
finance the capital improvements. The assessment results ate shown in Table 6.
TABLE 6
FISCAL ASSESSMENT NO. 1
FUND
2001
2003
2003
2004
2005
2006
GENERALFUND
REVENUES
$
9,553,527
$ 237,593
$ 9,976,601
$ 10.774,729
$ 11,636,707
$ 12,567,644
EXPENDITURES
$
9,807,985
$ 10,245,316
$ 11.357,716
$ 12,152,250
$ 13,309,247
$ 15,155,094
BALANCE
$
(254.458)
$ (1,007,723)
$ (1,381,115)
$ (1,377,521)
$ (1,672,540)
$ (2,587,450)
ENTERPRISE FUND
WATERtWASTEWATER
REVENUES
$
8,912.500
$ T194,915
$ 7,493,208
$ 7,808.279
$ 8,141,078
$ 8,492,610
EXPENSES
$
11,012,697
$ 313,537
$ 1,012,603
$ 7,061.644
$ 7.428,000
$ T137,411
BALANCE
$
(2,100,197)
$ 881,378
$ (2,519,395)
$ 746,435
$ 713.078
$ 1.355,199
REFUSE
REVENUES
$
1,281,531
$ 1,307,162
$ 133.305
$ 1,359,971
$ 1,387,170
$ 1,414,914
EXPENSES
$
1,257,521
$ 1,292.247
$ 1.328,014
$ 1,364,854
$ 1,402,B00
$ 1,441,884
BALANCE
$
24,010
$ 14,915
$ 5,291
$ (4,BB3)
$ (15.630)
$ (26,970)
STORMWATER
REVENUES
$
878,835
$ 913,988
$ 950,548
$ 988,570
$ 1,028,113
$ 1,069,237
EXPENSES
$
821,835
$ 997,066
$ 996,519
$ 1,045,618
$ 1,279,827
$ 1,339,656
BALANCE
$
57.000
$ (83,078)
$ (45,971)
$ (57,048)
$ (251.714)
$ (270,419)
IX-24
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Included in Table 6 are the projected revenues (as previously listed in Table 2) and expenditures
(consisting of the sum of the cost and expenditures shown in Tables 3, 4, and 5). Improvement
costs for transportation and recreation have been included in the General Fund, improvement costs
for wastewater, water, and solid waste are included in the Enterprise Fund, and stormwater
improvement costs have been included in the Stormwater Fund. The balance of each fund indicates
the difference between the projected revenues and expenditures. Revenue shortfalls for a given year
are indicated by a negative balance.
The City uses revenues from both the General and Enterprise Funds to meet annual operating
expenses. The General Fund is primarily used for transportation and recreation/park operating
services, while the Enterprise Fund is used for the operating costs associated with the Public Works
and Utilities Departments. Also included in the General Fund are CIP projects associated with
paving and drainage activities, and expenditure of the Public Works Department. Supplemental
funding is provided by the fees collected by the various departments from the persons directly
receiving the service.
The City-wide millage rate and the Enterprise Fund user charges are reviewed periodically by the
City as part of its budgeting process. Adjustments are made in order to ensure that sufficient funds
are available to meet expected expenses, including a reserve for contingency funds. In anticipation
of future increases in operating costs, the City may desire to adjust the millage rate and/or user
charges upward by small increments over a period of several years. This will initially provide
additional operating reserves, which can later be used to offset operating expense increases as they
occur and allow the City to moderate annual charges in the treillage rates and user charges. For
example, a one-half mill ($0.0005) increase in the ad valorem tax millage rate will generate
approximately $212,402 for the anticipated 2001 adjusted taxable value of $442,505,001. In
addition, the following increases in ad valorem tax revenues could result for 2001-2006:
Tax Base 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Result of
one-half
mill
Increase $ 2,739,991 $ 2,842.741 $ 2,949,343 $ 3,059,944 $ 3,174,692 $ 3,293,743
Within this section, the projected revenue shortfalls as indicated in Table 6 are identified. Various
methods of overcoming these revenue shortfalls are examined herein, and recommendations
developed as to the most appropriate methods of balancing the revenue and expenditure streams for
the City's funds. These balanced revenue/expenditure streams are shown in Table 7 and indicate
the achievement of an economically feasible comprehensive plan.
IX-25
Ordinance No. 2007-0-19
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
General Fund: As shown in Table 6, the General Fund is projected to have revenue shortfalls
during 2001-2006. This is largely due to the capital improvement projects that are planned during
the next five years.
In order to balance the projected revenue and expenditure streams within the General Fund, the
following changes in funding strategies will be implemented:
1. Increase the ad valorem tax assessment only if necessary to fund individual years;
2. Use appropriated reserve trust for lands, parks and open space to fund capital
improvements, as well as other fund balances reserved for capital improvements,
extensions and inventories;
3. Implement a transportation impact fee (in addition to the current County fee) and a
police/fire impact fee in fiscal year 2001;
4. Apply for various grants from state agencies to assist with various projects; and
5. Carry forward or use unreserved fund balances as revenues.
Enterprise Fund: Similar to the General Fund, the Enterprise Fund is showing revenue shortfalls
for the years 2001-2006. These revenue shortfalls are primarily due to the improvements to and
expansion of the City's wastewater treatment and disposal facilities, reclaimed facilities and water
plant improvements.
The balancing of the projected revenue and expenditure streams within the Enterprise Fund
recommended will be accomplished by the following funding strategy changes:
WASTEWATER:
1. Initiate a wastewater service rate, connection charge, and impact fee increase in
2001; and
2. Apply for various grants from state agencies to assist with various projects;
3. Obtain short term financing via low interest loans; and
4. Carry forward any unexpected funds as revenue.
SOLID WASTE:
1. Use appropriated retained earnings reserved for equipment purchases and other
unreserved retained to fund improvements;
2. Carry forward any unexpended funds as revenues.
WATER:
1. Apply for various grants from state agencies to assist with various projects; and
2. Obtain short term financing via low interest loans; and
3. Carry forward any unexpended funds as revenue.
IX-26
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
In the event that some of the proposed sources are not attained, the following alternative strategies
will be pursued;
1. Additional deferral of projects to later years;
2. Procurement of additional revenue bonds instead of funding projects on a "pay-
as-you-go" basis;
3. Procurement of additional grant funding;
4. Procurement of a state revolving fund loan; and
5. Increase user fees for municipal services.
Additionally, improved planning and coordination will be initiated among the City's utility
departments in order to ensure that public facility and service provision is optimally tunes for cost
effectiveness. For example, department representatives will work together to encourage the
provision of public facilities and services concumendy (where feasible), in order to limit the negative
impacts of separate installation (i.e. construct water/sewer services prior to paving/drainage
improvements).
Also, other entities which share facilities with the City (such as FDOT and Volusia County) sharing
the use of the U.S. Highway No. 1 within the City limit(s) will be coordinated with regarding
improvements to their shared facilities.
TABLE 7
FISCAL ASSESSMENT NO. 2
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
$ 9,807,985 $ 10,245,316 $ 11,357,716 $ 12,152,250 $ 13,309.247 $ 15,155,094
$ 9,807,985 $ 10,245,316 $ 11,357,716 $ 12,152,250 $ 13,309,247 $ 15,155,094
$ 11,012,697 $ 7.194,915 $ 10,012,603 $ 7,808,279 $ 8,141,078 $ 8,492,610
$ 11,012,697 $ 6,313,537 $ 1,012,603 $ 7,061,844 $ 7,428,000 $ 7,137,411
$ - $ 881,378 $ - $ 746,435 $ 713,078 $ 1,355,199
$ 1,281,531 $ 1,307,162 $ 133,305 $ 1,364,854 $ 1,402,800 $ 1,441,884
$ 1,257.521 $ 1,292,247 $ 1,328,014 $ 1,364,854 $ 1,402,800 $ 1,441,884
$ 24,010 $ 14,915 $ 5,291 $ - $ - $ -
$ 878,835 $ 997,066 $ 996,519 $ 1,045,618 $ 1,279,827 $ 1,339,656
$ 821,835 $ 997,066 $ 996,519 $ 1,045,618 $ 1,279,827 $ 1,339,656
$ 57,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
IX-27
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
E. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
The City shall undertake all actions necessary to ensure that needed public facilities and services are
provided to all residents within the City's jurisdiction in a manner that maximizes the use of existing
facilities, promotes orderly compact urban growth, and protects the City's investments in its existing
facilities.
Objective 1: Capital improvements will be provided to correct existing deficiencies, to
accommodate projected future growth, and to replace obsolete or worn-out facilities, as
indicated in the 5-year Schedule of Improvements delineated in this element.
Policy 1.1.1: The City shall include all projects identified in the CP which are
determined to be of relatively large scale and high cost ($25,000 or
greater) in the 5-year Schedule of Improvements as capital
improvement projects; all other capital improvements shall be
included in the 6-year capital improvements program and annual
capital budget.
Policy 1.1.2: The City shall, as a matter of priority, schedule and fund all capital
improvements identified by the 5-year Schedule of Improvements as
necessary to correct existing deficiencies.
Policy 1.1.3: The proposed capital improvement projects shall be evaluated and
ranked in order of priority according to the following guidelines:
a. Whether the project is needed to protect public health and
safety, to fulfill the City's legal commitment to provide facilities
and services, or to preserve or achieve full use of the existing
facilities;
b. Whether the project increases the efficiency of use of the
existing facilities, prevents or reduces future improvement cost,
provides service to developed areas lacking full service, or
promotes infill development; and
c. Whether the project represents a logical extension of facilities
and services within a designated urban service area.
Objective 2: The proportionate share of facility improvements which are necessitated by
future development in order to maintain adopted LOS standards shall be home by those
directly benefiting from the improvements.
IX-28
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Policy 1.2.1: The City shall continue to implement its impact fee programs as
conditions to providing utility services to new developments.
Policy 1.2.2: The City will investigate the possibility of setting up a transportation
impact fee ordinance, as well as a mandatory dedication of fees in lieu
of ordinance.
Objective 3: The City will manage its financial resources to ensure the provision of
needed capital improvements for previously issued development orders for
future development and redevelopment.
Policy 1.3.1: The City will not issue development orders or permits unless public
facilities (which meet the adopted level of service standards) needed
to support development or redevelopment are available, or will be
available concurrently with the impacts of the development.
Policy 1.3.2: The maximum ratio of outstanding indebtedness (for providing
capital improvements) to the property tax base shall be limited by the
City to no greater than .75%.
Policy 1.3.3: The City shall continue to adopt a 6-year capital improvements
program and annual budget as a part of its budgeting process.
Policy 1.3.4: The City will continue to apply for water, wastewater, solid waste,
and other available grants on an annual basis to obtain funding to
finance the provision of capital improvements.
Objective 4: The City shall base all decisions regarding the issuance of development
orders and permits on the coordination of the development requirements included in this
CP, its land development regulations and ordinances, and the availability of public facilities
needed to support such development at the time it is needed.
Policy MA: The City shall use the following LOS standards in reviewing the
impacts of new development and redevelopment upon public facility
provision:
Sanitary Sewer: 95 gallons per capita per day
Solid Waste: 2.75 pound per capita per day
Drainage: Level A — No significant street flooding
Level B — No major residential yard flooding
Level C — No significant structure flooding
IX-29
Ordwance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Level D — No limitation on flooding
(Based on 25-year/24-hour storm event)
Potable Water:
100 gallons per capita per day
Collector Roadways:
LOS D for peak hour volumes
Arterial Roadways:
LOS D for peak hour volumes
Limited Access Road:
LOS C
Public Transit Facilities (Volusta County): In process of establishing
LOS Standards.
Recreation Standards for Facilities:
Facility
Parkland
Baseball/Softball
Basketball Court
Tennis Court
Handball/Racquetball Court
Community Center
Multi-Purpose/Soccer
Shuffle Board Court
Bocci Ball Court
Volley Ball Court
Boat Ramps
Bike/Pedestrian Trail
Fitness Trails
Activities Center
Gymnasium
Unit of Measure
5 acres/ 1,000 persons
1 field/4,000 persons
1 court/5,000 persons
1 court/3,500 persons
1 court/4,000 persons
1 facility/30,000 persons
1 field/4,000 persons
1 court/1,500 persons
1 court/10,000 persons
1 court/5,000 persons
1 ramp/4,700 persons
1 mile/4,000 persons
1 / 14,000 persons
1 / 15,000 persons
N/A
Pohcy 1.4.2: The City shall evaluate all proposed CP amendments and requests for
new development or redevelopment according to the following
guidelines as to whether the proposed action would:
a. Contribute to a condition of public hazard as described in the
Utilities Element;
b. Exacerbate any existing condition of public facility capacity
deficits as described in the Utilities Element, the Transportation
Element, and the Recreation and Open Space Element;
c. Generate public facility demands that may be accommodated by
capacity increases planned in the 5-year Schedule of
Improvements;
IX-30
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
d. Conform with future land uses as shown on the Future Land Use
Map of the Future Land Use Element, and urban service areas as
described in the Utilities Element;
e. If public facilities are developer provided, accommodate public
facility demands based on adopted LOS standards;
f. If public facilities are provided, in part or whole, by the City,
demonstrate financial feasibility, subject to this element; and
g. Effect state agencies and water management districts' facilities
plans.
Objective 5: The City amend its Land Development Code to limit the size and density of
developments in the coastal high -hazard area, as defined by the Coastal Management
Element.
Policy 1.5.1: The City will not construct public facilities east of U.S.
Highway 1 unless no other feasible sites are available outside
the coastal high -hazard area. Where it becomes necessary to
construct public facilities in the coastal high -hazard area, the
design of the facilities will incorporate flood proofing and
additional structural support in order to ensure minimum
damage from storms and hurricanes.
Policy 1.5.2: The City will limit public expenditures that subsidize
development in coastal high -hazard areas except for the
restoration and enhancement of natural resources.
GOAL 2:
Provide for a financially feasible public school facilities program.
OBTECTFVE 2.1 Lrvel Of Senia Standards. The City shall ensure that the capacity of schools is
County.
Policy 2.1.2: Consistent with the interlocal agreement. the uniform, districtwidelevel-of-
service standards are set as follows using FISH capacity based on the
traditional school calendar:
IX-31
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
a. Elementary Schools: 115% of Permanent FISH capacity for the
concurrency service area
b. K- S Schools 115% of permanent FISH capacity for the concurrency
service area.
c. Middle Schools: 115% of permanent FISH capacity for the concurtency
service area
d. High Schools: 120% of permanent FISH capacity for the concurrency
service area
e. Special Purpose Schools: 100% of permanent FISH caTy
Policy21.3, The following schools shall achieve the designated level of service no later
than the identified date.
School
DATE
Orange City Elemen
ul
1, 2012
ManakeeGs
Horizon Elernentary
July1,
2014
Freedom Elernentary
July1,
2012
Osceola Elementary
1, 2014
Ortona Elementary
ul
1, 2014
Omtond Beach Elernentaty
July1,
2014
Southwestern Middle
ul
1. 2013
New Sm a Beach Middle
ul
1, 2012
Source: Volusia County Interlocal Agreement
OBJECTIVE 2.2 Scbwl Capital Facilities Planning. The City shall cooperate with the School Board to
ensure existing deficiencies and future needs are addressed consistent with adopted level of service
standards for public schools.
Policy 2 21 The City adopts by reference the School Board's five-year work program
approved annually each September as part of the overall School District
budget. The City shall review the annual work program to verify that it is
IX-32
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
financially feasible and will maintain the level of service standards by the end
of the five-year period.
Policv 2.2.2: The city shall cootdinate with the school board. and adopt development
conditions to ensure that future development gays a proportionate shaze of
the costs of capital facility capauty needed to accommodate new
development and to assist in maintaining the d pt d level of service
standards via impact fees and othet legally available and appropriate
methods.
IX-33
0zdm.an No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE (5-YEAR)
As shown in TABLE IX-8, the Five (5) Year Schedule of Improvements is the mechanism by which
the City can effectively stage the timing, location, projected cost, and revenue sources for the capital
improvements derived from all the UP elements, in support of the Future Land Use Element. This
5-Year Schedule of Improvements has been used to document the "economic feasibility" of the
City's CP, based upon the preceding sections of this element entitled "Capital Improvements
Inventory", "Financial Analysis", and "Goals, Objectives, and Policies".
The general locations of the scheduled projects are shown on Map IX-L
IX-34
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
J
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
TABLE IX-8
City of Edgewater
Five year schedule of improvamente
Fiscal Years Ending 2002-2006
New City Hall'
PUBLIC SAFETY: (FirelReacue)
Replace rescue pumper
ALS Apparatus at new station
Replace Batt. 57
Replace Military Brush Truck
Replace Utility Support Truck
DRAINAGE:
Conduct City de Shurnwater Management System Analysis and
1 Improvement Study
Implementation of improvements In Stormwater Master Plan
Conduct Improvements to Gabordy System Channel G2
Maintain existing structures In 18th St. Channel El
Maintain existing structures in 1Bth St. Channel E4
Maintain existing structures in 1801 St. Channel E6
SANITARY SEWER:
2 W WTF Reclaimed Water Improvements
Western Service Area Collection S Transmission System
Conduct existing gravity sewer system repairs
POTABLE WATER:
3 New wells
SR 442 Water System Upgrade
4 Southern service area ground storage tank
PARKS & RECREATION:
5 Construct BasebaNSoflball tieldsMawks Park
6 Construct Conservation areaMawks Park
7 Construct Amphitheater
8 Renovate and construct soccer complex
9 Purchase land for park
10 Develop cultural and arbortoreum Park
11 Purchase land for nature park
12 Develop nature park
13 Renovation of Kennedy Park
14 Additional boat ramps - Manard May Park
*Location yet to be deteatwted
Legend: R — Replacement, N — New, E — Expanded
IX-35
0edinance No. 2007-0-18
2004-2006 $ 250,000 General Fund
2003& 2005
$ 499,540
General Fund R
2003-2005
$ 390,000
General Fund N
2004
$ 32,400
General Fund R
2005
$ 84,413
General Fund
2003
$ 29,705
General Fund
2002
$ 120.000
Starmwater N
2002-2006
$ 300.000
Stormwater N
2004-2006
$ 360.000
Stomlwater N
2002-2006
$ 25,000
Stormwater
2002-2006
$ 25,000
Stormwater
2002-2006
$ 26,000
Sh mwater
2002 $ 2,000.000 Water/Sewer Fund
2003 $ 775,000 Water/Sewer Fund N
2002-2006 $ 500,000 Water/Sewer Fund
R
R
R
E
E
E
E
R
2003
$
350,000
Water/Sewer Fund
N
2002
$
750,000
Water/Sewer Fund
E
2004
$
500,000
Water/Sewer Fund
2002
$
500,000
General Fund
E
2002
$
25.000
General Fund
E
2002
$
45.000
General Fund
E
2002-2004
$
150,000
General Fund
R
2002
$
450,000
General Fund
N
2003
$
25,000
General Fund
N
2002-2004
$
350.000
General Fund
N
2006
$
200,000
General Fund
N
2005-2006
$
750.000
Geneml Fund
E
2006
$
150,000
General Fund
N
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
PROGRAM MONITORING AND EVALUATION
The role of monitoring and evaluation is vital to the effectiveness of any planning program and
particularly to the CIE. This is largely because the City's revenue and expenditure streams me
subject to fluctuations in the market and the economy. It is the behavior of these streams which will
be used to predict fiscal trends in order to maintain the City's adopted LOS standards for public
facilities. Therefore, the CIE requires a continuous program for monitoring and evaluation,
pursuant to Chapter 163, F.S., this element will be reviewed on an annual basis to ensure that
required fiscal resources are available to provide public facilities as necessary to support the adopted
LOS standards.
The annual review will be the responsibility of the local planning agency, and the City Finance
Director and City Manager will serve as advisory members at all formal deliberations related to
capital improvement monitoring and evaluation. The local planning agency's trading and
recommendations will be presented to the City Council at a public meeting. The City Council will
direct staff to take any actions deemed appropriate based on the findings and recommendations of
the local planning agency.
The review will include the following considerations, plus an examination of these considerations in
order to determine their continued appropriateness:
1. Any corrections, updates, modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; acceptance
of facilities pursuant to dedications which me consistent with the element; or the date of
construction of any facility enumerated in this element;
2. The CIE's consistency with the CP elements and its support of the Future Land Use
Element;
3. The City's ability to provide public facilities and services within the urban service area in
order to determine any need for boundary modification or adjustment;
4. The priority assignment of existing public facility deficiencies;
5. The City's progress in meeting those needs determined to be existing deficiencies;
6. The criteria used to evaluate capital improvement projects in order to ensure that
projects are being ranked in their appropriate order of priority;
7. The City's effectiveness in maintaining its adopted LOS standards;
S. The City's effectiveness in reviewing the impacts of plans and programs of state agencies
and water management districts that provide public facilities within the City's
jurisdiction;
9. The effectiveness of impact fees for assessing new development a pro rata share of the
improvement costs which they generate;
10. The impacts of special districts and any regional facility and service provision upon the
City's ability to maintain its adopted LOS standards;
11. The ratio of outstanding indebtedness to the property tax base;
IX-36
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
12. Efforts made to secure grants and/or private funds, whenever available to finance the
provision of capital improvements;
13. The transfer of any unexpected account balances;
14. The criteria used to evaluate proposed plan amendments and request for new
development or redevelopment; and
15. Capital improvements needed for the latter part of the planning period, for inclusion in
the 5-Year Schedule of Improvements.
In addition to the annual Capital Improvements Element review mentioned above, each request for
a development order will be reviewed by the Director of Planning, Public Works Director, Utilities
Director, City Engineer, and other appropriate personnel for the purpose of establishing whether
the various adopted level of service standards will be adversely impacted if development is allowed
to proceed. No development order will be issued if it is determined that the public facilities needed
to maintain the adopted level of service standards will not be available concurrently with the impact
of the development Further, issuance of development orders will be delayed until the correction of
existing system deficiencies which are required to increase the level of service provided to the
adopted standard are complete.
The following objectives and policies establish guidelines for the development of the City's
Concurrency Management System. None of this material was included in the original submittal to
DCA.
IX-37
Ordinance No. 2007-0-18
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EFFECTIVE JUNE 16, 2003
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
A. PUBLIC FACILITIES, CAPACITIES AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE INVENTORY
FOR CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
The following inventories shall be maintained by the City to be used for the concurrency assessment
of new development.
1. TRANSPORTATION
Design capacity of different roadway types.
The existing level -of -service measured by the p.m. peak hour directional trips.
The status of service degradation of those toads classified as backlogged based on
the methodology described in the Transportation Element of this Plan.
The adopted level -of -service standards for all roadway types.
The existing capacities or deficiencies of the roadway network.
The improvements to be made to the roadway network in the current fiscal year by
the City, Volusia County, the Florida Department of Transportation, or other public
agency and the impact of such improvements on the existing capacities or
deficiencies.
2. SANITARY SEWER
The capacity of the wastewater treatment facilities.
The existing level -of -service standards measured by the average number of gallons
per day/pee unit based on the average flow experienced at the treatment plant and
the total number of equivalent residential units within the service area.
The adopted level -of -service standards for average daily flow per equivalent
residential unit.
The existing deficiencies of the system.
The reserve capacities.
3. POTABLE WATER
The design capacity of potable water treatment facilities.
CM-1
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
The existing level -of -service measured by the average number of gallons per day per
unit based on the average flows experienced and the total number of equivalent
residential units within the service area.
The existing potable water storage capabilities of the water system.
The adopted level -of -service standards for the potable water facility components.
The existing capacities or deficiencies of the system.
The reserved capacities.
4. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
The design capacity of solid waste disposal facilities.
The existing level -of -service.
The adopted level -of -service standard for solid waste.
The projected capacities or deficiencies.
5. STORMWATER DRAINAGE
The existing level -of -service measured by stone event as determined by the City and
its Consulting Engineers.
The adopted level -of -service standard for stormwater drainage quantity and quality.
6. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
The existing acreage of parkland and the existing number of recreation facilities as
outlined in the Recreation and Open Space Element of this Plan.
The existing level -of -service measured by the number of acres of parkland available
per 1,000 residents of the City based on an inventory of parklands in the City and the
population of the City.
The existing level -of -service for recreation facilities measured by the adopted
standard based on an inventory of the facilities in the City and the population of the
City.
The adopted level -of -service standards for parkland acreage and individual recreation
facilities as outlined in the Recreation and Open Space Element of this Plan.
CM-2
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
The projected capacities or deficiencies.
B. CONCURRENCY ASSESSMENT
The Planning Department is responsible for determining concurrency for all applications for
development, redevelopment, and subdivision plats. When reviewing applications for such
developments, the Department performs a Concurrency Assessment to ensure that public facilities
are or will be available concurrent with the impacts of the proposed development. The assessment
includes a basis for the establishment of existing conditions and the capacity of existing public
facilities to service new development.
The Department shall identify:
1. The ability of existing facilities to accommodate the proposed development at the
adopted level -of -service standards;
2. Any existing facility deficiencies that will need to be corrected prior to the completion of
the proposed development;
3. The facility(s) improvements or additions that will be needed to accommodate the
impacts of the proposed development at the adopted level(s)-of-service created by the
proposed development; and
4. The date such facility(s) improvements or additions will need to be completed to be
concurrent with the impacts on such facility(s) created by the proposed development;
and
5. A recommendation or approval or denial with any applicable conditions or the timing
and location of needed improvements.
Prior to the issuance of a development order for a proposed new development, the City Council
and/or the Planning Department determines:
1. The impacts created by the proposed development;
2. Whether the public facilities covered under the Concurrency Management System will be
available concurrent with eh impacts of new development at the adopted level;
3. Those facility(s) improvements or additions that are required to ensure the findings of
concurrency; and
4. The entity responsible for the design and installation of all required facility(s)
improvements or additions.
1. Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, and Potable Water Facilities
a. A development order is issued subject to the condition that at the time of the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, or its functional equivalent, the necessary
facilities and services are in place and available to service the new development;
or
CM-3
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
b. At the time the development order is issued, the necessary facilities are
guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement pursuant to Section
163.3220, FS; or
c. An agreement, or development order, issued pursuant to Chapter 380, FS, to be
in place and available to serve the new development at the time of the issuance
of a Certificate of Occupancy. (Section 163.3180[2a], FS)
2. Parks and Recreation Facilities
a. At the time the development order is issued, the necessary facilities are in place,
or actual construction has commenced; or
b. A development order is issued subject to the condition that at the time of the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the acreage for the necessary facilities to
serve the new development is dedicated, or acquired by the City, or funds in the
amount of the developer's fair share are committed; and
c. A development order is issued subject to the conditions that the necessary
facilities needed to serve the new development are scheduled to be in place, or
under actual construction, not more than one (1) year after the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy, as provided in the City's Capital Improvement
Element; or
d. At the time the development order is issued, the necessary facilities are the
subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the necessary facilities
and services to serve the new development to be in place or under actual
construction no more than one (1) year after issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy or
e. At the time the development order is issued, the necessary facilities are
guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement parsuant to Section
163.3220, FS or under actual construction not more than one (1) year after
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
3. Transportation Facilities
a. At the time a development order is issued, the necessary facilities and services are
in place or under construction; or
b. A development order is issued subject to the conditions that the necessary
facilities and services needed to serve the new development are scheduled to be
in place or under actual construction not more than three (3) years after the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or its functional equivalent, as provided in
the adopted City's five (5) year schedule of capital improvements. The schedule
of capital improvements may include transportation projects included in the first
three (3) years of the most current adopted Florida Department of
Transportation Five Year Work Program. The Capital Improvement Element
must include the following policies:
CM-4
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
i. The estimated date of actual project construction commencement
and the estimated completion date;
il. A provision that a plan amendment is required to eliminate,
defer, or delay construction of any local road facility which is
needed to maintain the adopted level of service standard and
which is listed in the first three (3) years of the five (5) year
schedule of improvements in the Capital Improvements Element.
3. At the time a development order is issued, the necessary facilities me the subject of a
binding executed agreement which requires the necessary facilities to serve the new
development to be in place or under actual construction no more than three (3) years
after the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; or
4. At the time a development order is issued, the necessary facilities and services are
guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220,
FS; or an agreement or development order is issued pursuant to Chapter 380, FS;
and will be in place or under actual construction not more than three (3) years after
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
The adopted level -of -service standards (see Table I) are the minimum acceptable standards with
which all proposed new development shall comply. The Concurrency Management portion of this
element does not preclude the Planning and Zoning Board or the City Council from imposing other
conditions of approval, including improvements and additions to the facilities covered under this
system beyond the minimum necessary to achieve concurrency.
C. GENERAL RULES FOR CONCURRENCY ASSESSMENT
EXISTING
No development may be approved which will impact a facility which is currently deficient
unless the facility is required to be improved in the current fiscal year pursuant to a previous
development order or permit. Any needed improvements shall be completed prior to the
projected impacts of the proposed development.
2. APPROVED IMPACTS
The impacts of new development shall be assessed against the existing conditions and the
projected impacts from approved but unbuilt development. These two items together shall
be considered the existing conditions for all public facilities for the impact assessment of all
proposed development.
3. PHASING
Development that is proposed to be phased may also phase the improvement of facilities
provided the concurrency requirements for each facility me met.
CM-5
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
4. TIME SPECIFIC APPROVAL
All development approvals shall have a time period specified in the development order or
permit in which development must commence. The time period may involve two or more
phases but the timing of each phase shall be specified in the development order or permit.
Any required improvements shall also require a time period for construction and
completion. Should development or facilities improvements fad to begin or be completed in
accordance with the development order or permit, all outstanding approvals of the
development shall expire. Amendments to time schedules shall be permitted but must be
approved by the body granting the original approval.
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Planning Department may require additional information from applicant or other City
Departments in order for an accurate assessment to be conducted. Such additional
information requests shall be reasonable and be provided in writing to the applicant or
appropriate Department.
Should the Planning Department require a special study (such as traffic counts on a road that
is not regularly monitored), the applicant shall provide such information. Review and
approval of proposed development may be postponed for a reasonable time period in order
that more information may be gathered on a facility. Proposed development tray be denied
approval, for failure of the applicant to provide adequate information on the projected
impacts created by the development.
6. TRANSPORTATION
The City's Land Development Code provides development thresholds at which traffic
studies will be required. Required studies shall use the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE)
Manual to calculate the number of trips generated by the proposed development. The study
shall then show the distribution of the projected trips, determine existing condition and
project the level of service of impacted roads.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all facility improvements necessary to
accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving a Certificate of
Occupancy shall be in place. Completed improvements may be required prior to the
issuance of a building permit if deemed necessary for public safety purposes.
SANITARY SEWER
The City's Land Development Code provides sanitary sewer use standards for residential
and non-residential development based on equivalent residential units. The City may also
require commercial and industrial developments to provide a description and estimate of
water use needs for any commercial or industrial processes which create wastewater that will
be discharged into the City's system.
ChI-6
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all facility improvements necessary to
accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving a Certificate of
Occupancy shall be in place, as required by the Development Order.
8. POTABLE WATER
The City's Land Development Code provides potable water use standards for residential and
non-residential development based on equivalent residential units. The City may also require
commercial and industrial developments to provide a description and estimate of water use
needs for any commercial or industrial processes involving potable water.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all facility improvements necessary to
accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving a Certificate of
Occupancy shall be in place, as required by the Development Order.
9. SOLID WASTE
The City's Land Development Code provides solid waste standards for control and
operation for residential, commercial and industrial developments. Developments which are
potential hazardous waste generators will be responsible for coordinating with Volusia
County for disposal of such waste.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all facility improvements necessary to
accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving a Certificate of
Occupancy shall be in place.
10. STORMWATER DRAINAGE
All developments shall prepare a drainage plan based on the Stormwater regulations that
incorporate the level -of -service design storm. Such plans shall be approved by the City's
Engineer prior to the approval of the development.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, all facility improvements necessary to
accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving the building permit
shall be approved and all improvements shall be completed prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy.
11. RECREATION
The City's Land Development Code requires recreation impact fees for residential
construction and/or land conveyance for new subdivisions. Commercial and industrial
developments shall not be assessed as having an impact on recreational facilities. However,
the City reserves the right to require the provision of recreational facilities as part of Planned
Unit Developments.
Cif-7
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
D. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
GOAL 1:
The City shall undertake necessary action to economically and efficiently provide needed public
facilities and services to all residents within its jurisdiction in a manner which protects investments in
existing facilities, maximizes the use of existing facilities, and promotes orderly compact urban
growth.
Objective 1.1: Capital Improvements will be provided to correct existing deficiencies, to
accommodate anticipated future growth, and to replace outdated and obsolete facilities, as indicated
in the Schedule of Improvements of this Element.
Policy 1.1-1
The City shall included all projects identified in the other Elements of
this Comprehensive Plan determined to be of relatively large scale in
cost ($25,000 or greater) as Capital Improvement Projects and are
included within the Schedule of Improvements portion of this
Element.
Policy 1.1.2
The City shall, for accounting purposes, also include into this
Element Debt Service and Operating expenditures.
Policy 1.1.3
The City shall, as a matter of priority, schedule and fund all capital
improvement projects in the City's annual Capital Improvement
Program which are designed to correct existing deficiencies as listed
in the various other Elements of this Plan.
Policy 1.1.4
The City will continue its current program of providing for renewal
and replacement of capital facilities as outlined in the various
Elements of this Plan.
Policy 1.1.5
A Capital Improvements Coordinating Committee shall be created,
composed of the Director(s) of Environmental Services (Public
Works and Utilities), Recreation and Finance, as well as a
representative from the Planning Department, and the City Manager,
to evaluate and rank, on an annual basis, in order of priority, the
projects proposed to be included in the Schedule of Improvements.
Policy 1.1.6
Proposed City Capital Improvement Projects shall be evaluated and
ranked in order of priority according to the following criteria:
a. Whether the project is needed to protect the public health and safety, to
fulfill the City's legal commitment to provide facilities and services, or to
preserve or achieve full use of those facilities already in place;
M
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
b. Whether the project increases efficiency of use of existing facilities,
prevents or reduces future improvement costs, provides services to
develop areas lacking full service, or promotes in -fill development;
c. Whether the project represents a logical extension of facilities and
services within the designated Urban Service Area Boundary, and is
coordinated with the plans of County and/or State agencies that provide
facilities within the City;
d. Whether the project implements the policies of this Comprehensive Plan
as they pertain to the concurrency requirements;
e. Whether the project is financially feasible.
Objective 1.2: Future development will bear a proportionate cost of facility improvements
necessitated by the development in order to maintain the adopted level -of -service standards.
Policy 1.2.1 The City will continue to collect impact fees from development
projects to pay for the provision of water, sewer, and recreation
facilities required by those projects.
Policy 1.2.2 The City shall consider the use of other impact fees, such as for
public safety services.
Policy 1.2.3 All new development shall be required to donate or reserve their fair
share of right-of-way adjacent to major roadways prior to the
issuance of a final development order.
Objective 1.3: The City will manage its financial resources to ensure the provision of
needed capital improvements for previously issued development orders and for future
development and redevelopment. This objective shall be achieved through the
implementation of the following policies:
Policy 1.3.1 In providing capital improvements, the City shall limit the maximum
ratio of outstanding indebtedness to no greater than 15% of the
property tax base.
Policy 1.3.2 The City shall continue to adopt a Capital Improvement Program and
an operating budget on a yearly basis as part of this budgeting
process.
Policy 1.3.3 The City shall continue to apply for and secure grants or private
funds whenever available to finance the provision of capital
improvements and other City improvement projects.
Policy 1.3.4 Prior to the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy, the City will
provide for all public facilities needed to service development for
which Development Orders were previously issued.
105193
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
Policy 1.3.5 The City shall allocate the costs of new public facilities on the basis
of the benefits received by the existing and future residents.
GOAL 2:
Maintain a Concurrency Management System to ensure public facilities and services to support
development are available concurrent with the impact of development.
Objective 2.1: The City will continue to utilize a Concuxrency Management System so that
decisions regarding the issuance of development orders and permits will be based upon
coordination of the development requirements included in this plan, the land development
regulations, and the availability of necessary facilities to support such development.
Policy 2.1.1 The City shall use the level -of -service (LOS) standards (found in
Table I) in reviewing the impacts of new development and/or
redevelopment upon public facilities and services.
Level -of -Service Standards
TABLE
Sanitag Sewer
95 gallons/capita/day
Solid Waste
2.51bs/ca ita/da
Potable Water
Water uali : Meet State and Federal Draiking Water Standards
100 gallons/capita/day
Drainage
25 ear/24 he storm
Limited Access Roads C, or as otherwise prescribed by FDOT
Arterial D
Collectors D
Recreation
LOS/Person
Parkland
5acres/1,000 Persons
Baseball/Softball
1 Field/4,000 persons
Basketball Cotut
1 court/5,000 persons
Tennis Court
1 court/3,500 persons
Handball/Rac netball Court
1 court/4,000 pera.a
C.a.ity Center
1 facili /30,000 peraons
Multi-Purpose/Soccer
1 field/4,000 pens.n.
Shuffle Board Court
1 court/1,500 pen..
Boca Ball Court
1court/10,000 Pens..a
Voile
Ball Court
1 count/5,000 Peones
Boat
Rams
1 tarn /4,700 ptesons
Bike/Pedestrian Trail
1 aile/4,000 ersons
Fitness Trails
1 mile/14,000 penans
Actinides Center
1/15,000 penstares
Gymnasium
I N/A
ERU-Equivalent Residential Units
Policy 2.1.2 Prior to the approval of an application for a final subdivision
or development plan, the City will review the proposed
application to ensure that the public facilities and services
CM-10
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
needed to support the development me available concurrent
with the impacts of such development based on the
Concurrency Management System.
Policy 2.1.3 Provisions in the Comprehensive Plan that ensure public
facilities and service standards will be met to satisfy the
Concurrency requirements are listed below:
a. The necessary facilities and services are in place at the
time a development permit is issued; or
b. A development pemtit is issued subject to the
condition that the necessary facilities and services will
be in place when the impacts of the development
occur; or
c. The necessary facilities are under construction at the
time a permit is issued; or
d. The necessary facilities and services me guaranteed in
an enforceable development agreement that includes
the provision of Rules 9J-5.005(2)(a) 1-3, Florida
Administrative Code. The agreement must guarantee
that the necessary facilities and services will be in
place when the impacts of the development occur; or
e. At the time the development permit is issued, the
necessary facilities and services me the subject of a
binding executed contract which provides for the
commencement of the actual construction of the
required facilities or the provision of services within
one (1) year of the issuance of the applicable
development permit.
f. The necessary facilities and services me guaranteed in
an enforceable development agreement which
required the commencement of the actual
construction of the facilities or the provision of
services within one (1) year of the issuance of the
applicable development permit.
Policy 2.1.4 Proposed Plan amendments and requests for new
development or redevelopment shall be evaluated according
to the following guidelines as to whether the proposed action
would:
a. Be consistent with the Utilities Element and the Coastal
Management Element and not contribute to a condition of
public hazard.
CM-11
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
b. Be consistent with the Transportation Element; Utilities
Element and Recreation and Open Space Element and not
intensify any existing public facility capacity deficits not
envisioned within this plan.
c. Generate public facility demands that may be accomplished
by planned capacity increases.
d. Conform with future land uses as shown on the Future Land
Use Map of the Future Land Use Element.
e. Accommodate public facility demands based upon level -of -
service standards by provision of facilities by the developer or
by the City consistent with this element.
f. Be consistent with the County, State, and Regional agencies
and water management district's facilities plans.
CNI-12
EXHIBIT'A'
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
EFFECTIVE MARCH 2O02
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................1
B. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION DATA AND ANALYSIS ....................
I
1.
Federal............................................................................................................................1
2.
State of Florida...............................................................................................................2
3.
Regional Entities...........................................................................................................3
4.
Local and County Governments and Agencies.............................................................3
S.
Utilities...........................................................................................................................3
6.
Existing Intergovernmental Coordination Mechanisms...............................................4
a. Edgewater and Oak Hill...............................................................................................................4
b. Edgewater and Volusia County Metropolitan Planning Organization..................................4
c. Edgewater and Volusia County ...................................................................................................4
d. Edgewater and St. Johns River Water Management District..................................................6
e. Edgewater and the State of Florida, Department of Community Affairs ............................
6
f. Edgewater and School Board......................................................................................................
6
g. Water Authority of Volusia(W.A.V.).........................................................................................6
h. Florida Department of Transportation......................................................................................
7
i. Edgewater and Office of the State Attorney .............................................................................
7
j. Areas of on -going coordination but no formal agreements ...................................................
7
C. AREAS OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ANALYSIS......................7
a. Future Land Use Element............................................................................................................7
b. Natural Resources.........................................................................................................................7
c. Water Quality .................................................................................................................................7
d. Wetland and Natural Resources..................................................................................................8
Ordinance No 2007-0-18 V III-1
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
D. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
Ordinance No 2007-0-18 VIII-v
10
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
LIST OF MAPS
Map VIII- 1: Location of Indian River Elementary School........................................................... 14
Map V11I- 2: FDOT Roadways Located Within Edgewater ............................................... 15
OMi..ac No 2007-0-18 VIII-jp
C O
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
CHAPTER VIII
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
A. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this element of the Comprehensive Plan is in promote adequate coordination of
activities in overlapping areas of cone.,, among Federal, State, County and Municipal levels of
government and other public authorities. Areas of overlapping concern may include issues such as
land use planning, provision of public facilities and services, environmental protection, and
development regulations.
B. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION DATA AND ANALYSIS
Edgewater is affected by a variety of agencies and authorities having concerns in a variety of areas
including natural resources, utilities, education, recreation and transportation. The various agencies
and their areas of responsibility are listed below.
1. Federal
Several Federal agencies interact significantly with the City of Edgewater. The following
table provides an inventory for these Federal agencies.
Federal Agency
Primary Service Provided to Edgewater
Army Corps of Engineers
Responsible for issuing of permits for dredge
and fill in wetland mesa.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Responsible for protecting the environment;
monitors air and water quality, wastewater,
and hazardous waste clean-ups.
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Determines flood prone areas for purposes
(FEMA)
of participation in the National Flood
Insurance Program. Provides emergency
assistance in the event of a disaster.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)
Protection of fish and wildlife.
Federal Aviation Administration
Responsible for regulating aviation issues
related to Massey Air Park.
2.
Oolimo. No 2007-0-18 VIII-1
O O
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
3. State of Florida
Several State agencies provide financial resources, regulatory control and technical assistance
to the City of Edgewater.
State Agencies
Primary Service Provided to Edgewater
Florida Department of Community Affairs
Reviews DRI's, comprehensive plans and
(DCA)
provides technical assistance regarding
growth management and community
development.
Florida Department of Environmental
Regulates and permits potable water and
Protection (FDEP)
wastewater treatment facilities. Protects state
lands, manages state parks and recreation
areas and performs a variety of other land
management and regulatory duties.
Florida Department of Transportation
Responsible for transportation planning and
(FOOT)
maintenance of state roads. Roadways within
Edgewater that are maintained by FDOT are
shown on Map VIII-2.
Florida Department of Children and
Regulates a variety of sanitary practices
Families (FDCF)
relative to environmental health. Licenses
group homes and other treatment facilities.
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Responsible for the regulation and
Commission (FFWCC)
protection of wildlife and fish and for
providing information and technical
assistance regarding listed species.
Department of State, Division of Historical
Responsible for the protection of national
Resources
and historic landmarks and historic districts
and any properties eligible for possible
inclusion into the State Master File or
Register of Historic Places.
Ordinance No 2007-0-18 VIII-2
v
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
4. Regional Entities
Several Regional agencies have jurisdiction within the City of Edgewater. The table below
provides an inventory of these agencies.
Regional Entities
Primary Service Provided to Edgewater
St. Johns River Water Management
Regulates and permits drainage systems and
District (SJRWMD)
issues consumptive use permits.
East Central Florida Regional Planning
Reviews DRI's and prepares regional policy plan.
Council (ECFRPC)
5. Local and County Governments and Agencies
The City of Edgewater interacts on a regular basis with many Volusia County agencies. An
inventory of these agencies is provided below.
Local Agencies
Primary Service Provided to Edgewater
The Volusia County School Board
Responsible for providing all aspects of public
education, including planning for school site,
locations and funding. The School Board only
operates two schools in Edgewater, Edgewater
Elementary School and Indian River Elementary
School. The locations of these Facilities are
shown on Ma VIII-I.
The Volusia Council of Governments
Serves as a liaison between cities and Volusia
County. Volusia County funds its operations.
The council works toward mtetgovernmental
coordination.
Volusia County Government
Administers planning and zoning for
unincorporated portions of county; maintains
county road system; provides other services in
various areas i.e. solid waste water, and am").
The Volusia County Growth
Responsible for promoting coordination and
Management Commission (GMC)
consistency in the areas of planning and public
services among the cities and County of Volusia.
The Volusia County Soil and Water
Responsible for regulation of soil and water
Conservation District
issues.
6. Utilities
The City of Edgewater operates its own potable water and sanitary sewer utility within the
City limits. A map illustrating the service area of the City's utilities is provided within the
Infrastructure Element of this plan. Florida Power and Light provides electric utilities within
the City of Edgewater.
Ordinance No 2007-0-18 VIII-3
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
Existing Intergovernmental Coordination Mechanisms
In general, most of the Federal, State and Regional agencies listed above have legislative
authority to carry out their various activities. Hence, the basis for their interaction with the
City of Edgewater lies in their enabling legislation, and may be regulatory, jurisdictional, or
advisory. In any case, the existing coordination mechanisms are generally effective, and the
primary responsibilities for coordination rests with the City Manager.
The County agencies have a great deal of interaction with the City. This interaction has been
informal in most cases, however the County presently has several formal Intedocal
agreements with the City of Edgewater. The City is currently in negotiations with the County
to develop a joint planning agreement for future growth in unincorporated mesa adjacent to
the City.
Efforts to work with the Volusia County School Board have proved effective. The City and
School Board jointly plan for future site and sharing of school facilities for recreational uses.
Edgewater's size of government is such that the City Manager has overall responsibility for
intergovernmental coordination activities with all agencies including those on the County
level. Various City departments provide support in different areas. In the areas of water,
wastewater, drainage and roads, the Department of Environmental Services provides the
needed support services to facilitate these coordination efforts. In the area of recreation, the
coordination with the County and School Board is provided by the Recreation and Planning
Departments. In the area of planning, the Planning Department provides the services. In the
area of public safety, the City's Police and Fire Departments provide mutual aid assistance.
Following is an inventory of the existing interlocal agreements Edgewater has with other
agencies.
These parties mutually agree that Edgewater will supply dispatch services for the
Oak Hill Police Department at no cost. However, Edgewater will not provide fire
and rescue dispatch or the cost of Oak Hill's equipment necessary to enable
Edgewater to provide dispatch services.
b. Edgewater and Vnl„ala County Merrnpnrtoo Planning O
The VCMPO has the lead role in formulating regional transportation plans and
programs and coordinating transportation issues among local entities and the FDOT.
The City of Edgewater agrees to provide VCMPO with the funding necessary to
support its desired role in planning and funding the Volusia County Transponation
System, which help ensure a high quality of life and economic vitality for the
community.
The City of Edgewater has several Interlocal agreements with Volusia County. These
agreements include:
Ordinance No 2007-0-18 V III-4
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
An agreement providing joint planning for parks and recreation issues, including
pats siting, the extension of County park service areas into Edgewater and the
provision of County funding for summer recreational programs in Edgewater. This
agreement was executed in 1992 and remains in effect until 2012.
An agreement granting the County street naming approval for the 911 system. This
is a perpetual agreement executed in 2000.
An agreement providing for the City and County to recover costs from hazardous
material recovery. This is a perpetual agreement executed in 1992.
A lease agreement with the County for the operation of the Edgewater Library. This
agreement was executed in 1999 and is valid until 2009.
An agreement with the County to complete solid waste grant applications with
FDEP. This agreement was executed in 1994 and is to remain in effect until the State
of Florida terminates its recycling and education grant programs.
An Interlocal agreement with the County to provide the City with the
reimbursement of administrative fonds for the collection of non -ad valorem
assessments, specifically those for road and wastewater improvements. This is a
perpetual agreement that was executed in 1994 and can be terminated by either
pant.
An agreement with the County to include the City of Edgewater's population in the
County's CDBG and HOME grant applications. The original agreement was
executed in 1996 and is valid for an initial three year period with three successive and
automatic three year extensions.
An Interlocal agreement with Volusia County to allow for a change order in the
construction of a County treatment facility that will receive wastewater transmitted
by the City. This agreement was executed in 1999.
An interlocal agreement with Volusia County to have Edgewater provide potable
water within the County's service area and for the County to accept some of the
City's wastewater for treatment. This agreement was executed in 1999 and is valid
for twenty years with an extension clause to allow the agreement to run in perpetuity.
An agreement with the County to provide for the distribution of the 5-cent local
option gas tax. This agreement was executed in 1999 and is valid through 2003.
An agreement with the County to provide for a uniform system for the licensing,
registration and discipline of registered contractors. The original agreement was
executed in 1999 and is valid for an initial three year period with three successive and
automatic three year extensions.
An intedocal agreement with the County to allow the Volusia County Health
Department to enforce provisions of the City's body art code. This is a perpetual
agreement executed in 2000.
An agreement with the County to include Edgewater in the countywide radio system.
This agreement was executed in 1994 and is valid through 2004.
Ordinance No 2007-0-18 VIII-5
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
A mutual aid agreement for between each city in Volusia County and the Volusia
County Sheriffs Office to mutual aid law enforcement services. This agreement was
executed in 1997 and is valid through 2004.
A mutual aid agreement for between each City in Volusia County and the Volusia
County Fire Services for mutual aid fire -rescue services.
This is a Cost Share Agreement stating that S]RWMD agrees to make payments to
the City, while the City agrees to furnish and deliver all materials and to perform all
labor for the Edgewater Reclaimed Water Augmentation Project.
C. Edgewater and the State of Flnridg, Drmrtmrnt of Community Affair,
This is a mutual assistance agreement stating that the City of Edgewater, the
Department of Community Affairs, and all other local governments will form an
integrated statewide disaster response plan that will provide mutual assistance in
emergency situations. The agreement was executed in 2000 and is valid for one year
with a one year extension.
An existing agreement regarding the use of playground facilities, this agreement is for
the purpose of expanding public recreational facilities within the County without
impairing school facilities or disturbing the learning process. The facilities will be for
exclusive use of the School Board during school hours, while the City may have use
of the facilities after school hours and on the weekends.
An Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning between the City and
the Volusia County School Board was adopted to include: better coordination of
new schools in time and place with land development, greater efficiency for the
school board and local governments by placing schools to take advantage of existing
and planned roads, water, sewer, and parks, improved student access and safety by
coordinating the construction of new and expanded schools with the road and
sidewalk construction programs of the local governments, and reduction of pressures
contributing to urban sprawl and support of existing neighborhoods by appropriately
locating new schools and expanding and renovating existing schools.
g. Water Authority of Volusia (W.A.V.)
This agreement that creates the Water Authority of Volusia, which is between the
following cities: Daytona Beach, Holly Hill, Ormond Beach, Port Orange, New
Smyrna Beach, South Daytona, Town of Ponce Inlet, Deland, Orange City,
Edgewater, DeBary, Lake Helen, Daytona Beach Shores, Deltona, and Volusia
County. It is the intent of the members to protect and preserve their future water
supply through good groundwater management practices, comprehensive planning,
and Interlocal cooperation. This agreement was executed in August 2003.
Ordinance No 2007-0-18 VIII-6
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
The City of Edgewater is party to an agreement with the FDOT to create the Volusia
County Metropolitan Planning Organization. Volusia County and each city within
Volusia County me also parties to this agreement. This agreement was executed in
1996 and remains in effect until one party terminates the agreement.
The City of Edgewater Police Department entered into an agreement with the State
Attorney to provide services for victims of violent crimes.
There me several areas where cooperative efforts are undertaken without the force of
written agreements. These areas include: law enforcement and fire -rescue services,
parks and recreation, planning and development review and transportation.
C. AREAS OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ANALYSIS
As Edgewater continues to grow, there are a number of problems and needs which would
benefit from additional coordination. These include:
Planning for areas adjacent to Edgewater. There is no formal interlocal agreement
between the County and Edgewater regarding future land use, services and facilities
in the adjacent unincorporated areas. Of particular concern me the unincorporated
areas to the west of the City. The drainage from these areas into the City's system
remains an area of concern. The type and intensity of development in the County's
portion of this area is of particular concern to the City. The southern area near
Volco Road is also an area that as development in the County continues, the
drainage issues should be coordinated with the County.
b. Natural RPsnnr ea
The protection of wellLelds and the recharge areas would also benefit from County
and City coordination. However, the City does have an adopted wellfield protection
ordinance.
C. &.'m
The water quality of the Indian River is a multi -jurisdictional issue, which is not
being adequately addressed at this time. The closing by the Volusia County Health
Department of Menmd-May Park due to water quality issues is but one example of
the need for coordination with the State and surrounding cities in an effort to
address the water quality of the Indian River. The monitoring of the water quality in
the estuary is a concern and requires joint City and County efforts. Since storrawater
runoff from State Road U.S. 1 goes directly into the River, the City should continue
Ordinance No 2007-0-18 VIII-7
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
to coordinate with FDEP and other State agencies to improve the water quality of
this important resource.
Adjacent to the City to the west is Turnbull Hammock, which is a significant
environmentally sensitive area. Policies in the Conservation Element call for
coordination with the SJRWMD, Volusia County and other relevant agencies for the
preservation of this area. The City should also continue to coordinate with the
FFWCC, FDEP and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service during the development
review process. This coordination will help ensure Edgewater's natural resources are
protected from any potential negative impacts associated with development.
MEMEMkY[S:T. ",M-1
Level -of -Service (LOS) Standards and Road Improvements. The levels of service
and projected traffic counts by the County differ from those set by the City.
Therefore, the issues of LOS standards, funding for road improvements and
concurrency management are problems which could benefit from more County and
City coordination.
f. I lrilirirc
The City is completing an update to its master drainage plan and should seek
coordination with the State, Volusia County, and the City of New Smyrna Beach to
ensure the report accounts for extrajudsdictional issues. Such coordination efforts
could include more coordination in land use planning for the areas noted above.
The problems associated with the stortmwater management are often multi -
jurisdictional and must be solved in this manner.
The City should also continue its coordination with Volusia County for the provision
of potable water and sanitary sewer services in the southern portion of the City. This
coordination will ensure the most efficient and cost effective provision of services.
The City should continue its practice of the shared use of school facilities within the
City's recreation program. Additional coordination efforts should be made with
Volusia County and the City of New Smyrna Beach to ensure that services are not
duplicated. In an effort to increase efficiency, the City should also attempt to
coordinate with the Volusia County School Board when it locates new school
facilities in Edgewater. Through this coordination, the City can attempt to collocate
community facilities such as parks and community centers.
Additional development can be expected to continue to occur in the vicinity of the I-
95 interchange and in the southern areas of the City. Annexation of additional land
is a responsible strategy aimed at establishing City control over activities which will
Ordinance No 2007-0-18 V III-S
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
use its services and effects its own growth and development. Specific details of the
growth and development of the City are provided in the following elements:
• Future Land Use (including the Future Land Use Map)
• Transportation
• Infrastructure (including Sewer, Water, and Drainage)
• Conservation
• Housing
The projected growth for Edgewater will have regional impacts on issues such as
natural resources, recreation, transportation and infrastructure. The City needs to
maintain its existing relationships with the various organizations which have
responsibility for regional and area -wide planning activities, including the Regional
Planning Council, the Volusia Council of Governments, the Growth Management
Commission, and the Volusia County government.
Ordinance No 2007-0-18 VIII-9
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL.000RDINATION ELEMENT
D. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
GOAL 1: Promote coordination and cooperation between Edgewater and those agencies and
parties which have an interest in the future and growth of the area through increased awareness of
the plans, interests and concerns of all parties.
Objective 1.1: The City shall continue to coordinate with Volusia County and the Volusia
County School Board on matters involving planning for services, facilities, adjacent land uses and
the area's natural resources.
Policy 1.1.1:
The City will seek to enter into an interlocal agreement with Volusia
County within 12 months of the effective date of this amendment
regarding the planning for areas adjacent to and surrounding the City of
Edgewater, including a future joint planning area, future annexation
boundaries, urban service boundaries, and a matrix of compatible County
and City land uses.
Policy 1.1.2:
The City will coordinate with Volusia County and the Volusia Growth
Management Commission regarding the impacts of development in
Edgewater on adjacent local governments.
Policy I.1.3:
Provide for on -going coordination with Volusia County, the Volusia
County MPO and FDOT relative to level of service issues and capital
improvement needs for areas within and adjacent to Edgewater.
Policy MA:
The City shall coordinate with the Volusia County School Board in
locating future school sites during the development process. This
coordination will be achieved through the policies regarding school siting
ctiteria found in the Future Land Use Element.
Policy 1.1.5:
The City shall maintain its existing interlocal agreement with the Volusia
County School Board regarding the use of existing playground facilities
and future facilities at Indian River Elementary.
Policy I.1.6:
The City shall coordinate with the Volusia County School Board when
locating new in an attempt to collocate community facilities such as
parks, libraries and community centers.
Policy 1.1.7:
By December 2003, the City shall attempt to develop an interlocal
agreement with Volusia County regarding the protection of natural
resources, especially the Turnbull Hammock Area in the western part of
the City.
Policy 1.1.8:
The City will actively support and join County and State efforts to define
recharge areas and to control the type and intensity of development in
these areas so that the City's groundwater resources are protected.
Ordinance No 2007-0-18 V III-10
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
Policy LL9: The City will cooperate on County and State efforts to monitor water
quality m the estuary.
Policy 1.1.10: The City shall encourage and participate in intergovernmental
management efforts to protect the quality of the Indian River/Mosquito
Lagoon.
Objective 1.2: Provide for on -going coordination of all planning activities mandated by the
various elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan with the appropriate agencies and commissions.
Policy 1.2.1:
The City shall coordinate with and support the activities of the S]RWMD
in pursuing opportunities to acquire additional lands within the
environmentally sensitive Turnbull Hammock Area through coordination
with the County's land acquisition program.
Policy 1.2.2:
During the development review process, the City shall assist in the
application of and compliance with State and Federal regulations
pertaining to endangered and rare species.
Policy 1.2.3:
The City shall consult with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission prior to the issuance of a development approval which
would adversely impact rare or endangered species.
Policy 1.2.4:
The City will participate in state efforts to monitor air quality in the
Edgewater area.
Policy 1.2.5:
If and when conflicts of purpose among jurisdictions cannot be resolved
locally, seek mediation assistance from the East Central Florida Regional
Planning Council and/or Volusia County Growth Management
Commission. This Policy shall also pertain to the resolution of conflicts
involving dredge spoils disposal sites.
Policy 1.2.6:
Provide services and information as needed to any requesting agency to
further intergovernmental coordination.
Objective 1.3: The City shall continue to coordinate with Volusia County and FDOT in
reviewing the impacts of proposed developments.
Policy 1.3.1: Provide for on -going coordination with Volusia County and the Volusia
County Growth Management Commission during the development
review process to reduce potential negative impacts in areas of the
County that may affect Edgewater's drainage system.
Policy 1.3.2: On an annual basis. the City shall evaluate the extent of coordination
efforts with FDOT and Volusia County regarding the impacts of
development on the LOS of County and FDOT roadways.
0,dina.,ce No 2007-0-18 V III-11
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
Objective 1.4: The City will work closely with the City of New Smyrna Beach and other
governmental agencies to identify areas of common interest and to establish coordination between
their plans for the provision of services and those of the City.
Policy 1.4.1: _ By December 2002, the City of Edgewater shall provide information on
growth and development activities inside the City which may have
implications on the facilities and operations of the government entities
involved.
Policy 1.4.2: On a continuing basis, the City of Edgewater shall provide to the City of
New Smyrna Beach copies of all development applications requiting City
Council approval that involve property adjacent to New Smyrna Beach in
order to obtain comments.
b. School B,�rd fiv,=I,,r Acilities, work program
c. School Board 'dorntinnnl Plant sumey (every fiffli year)
Ordivauce No 2007-0-18 VIII-12
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
Ordinance No 2007-0-18 VIII-13
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
Map VIII- 1: Location of Indian River Elementary School
Ordinance No 2007-0-18 VIII-14
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
Map VIII- 2: PDOT Roadways Located Wid iin Edgewater
Ordinance No 2007-0-18 VIII-15