Loading...
08-18-2008 - Regular CITY COUNCIL OF EDGEWATER REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 18, 2008 7:00 P.M. COMMUNITY CENTER MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Thomas called the Regular Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Community Center. ROLL CALL Mayor Michael Thomas Councilwoman Debra Rogers Councilwoman Gigi Bennington Councilwoman Harriet Rhodes Councilman Ted Cooper Acting City Manager Tracey Barlow City Clerk Bonnie Wenzel City Attorney Carolyn Ansay Present Present Present Present Present Present Present Present INVOCATION, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE There was a silent invocation and pledge of allegiance to the Flag. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Regular Meeting of May 19, 2008 Councilwoman Rhodes moved to approve the May 19, 2008 minutes, second by Councilman Cooper. The MOTION CARRIED 5 - 0 . 3. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/PLAQUES/CERTIFICATES/DON ATIONS A. Mayor to present appreciation plaques to Everglades Boats, Edgewater Power Boats and Boston Whaler for their support of the 4th of July Fireworks show Page 1 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 Mayor Thomas presented a plaque to Edgewater Power Boats for their support of the 4th of July fireworks. He expressed his appreciation. He commented on the old fashioned 4th of July we have in Edgewater. We could not afford it this year. These boat manufacturers came to our rescue and the show was fantastic. He thanked them all for what they did. There was a round of applause. Due to Everglades Boats and Boston Whaler not being present, their plaques would be delivered to them. 4. CITIZEN COMMENTS The following citizens spoke: Peggy Cousins, 150 Williams Road, President, Edgewater Fire/Rescue Association, stated the three boat manufacturers made it happen but they also had two City employees who saw a vision, when nobody else could come through with it, Stephen Cousins and Jill Danigel and the Edgewater Professional Firefighters Union chipped in as well. She felt they needed a round of applause as well. Councilwoman Bennington stated that was one of the best fireworks displays she has ever seen in Edgewater. Mike Visconti, 316 Pine Breeze Drive, read a prepared statement entitled "The City of Edgewater, the Past and the Future." Due to the length of the agenda, Mayor Thomas asked Mr. Visconti to finish his presentation during the second Citizen Comments section. Bill Glaser, 1703 Needle Palm Drive, stated when they voted for the 35 foot height limit a guy by the name of Blassy he thought had something to do with it said Edgewater would die and little did he know they killed the whole country. Mr. Glaser commented on reviewing the 2007 CAFR. He referred to Page 47 and stated it said the City is paying FIND $505,657 every year until the year 2012. He thought back when they sold the last of the acreage in ParkTowne the previous City Manager gave them a report one night and said after paying off everything they got $22,000 in taxes from ParkTowne and they lost $31,000 on the deal but he said everything was paid off. He was wondering what the $500,000 was that they are paying to FIND each year until the year 2012. Acting City Manager Barlow commented on Page 2 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 what is outstanding and this also including some infrastructure promises that were made in some other contracts that the City is obligated to. Finance Director John McKinney stated of the $2,375,000 that we received through September 30, 2007 from the proceeds of the sale of ParkTowne, all of that money was transferred to the General Construction Fund to pay for Rowan Way and Base Leg Drive road construction, which is now completed. We had just under $800,000 remaining in that fund. Of that $250,000 was for the animal shelter. The remaining was from the proceeds from last year that they hadn't expended. They received enough money to pay for the Page 47 debt for FIND but it was chose to use it in other means that they couldn't finance last year for Base Leg Drive and Rowan Way. They could have paid off the FIND debt but the previous City Manager and Finance Director put it in as a mechanism to pay for other work. Bob Lott, 2112 S. Riverside Drive, stated he was looking over the agenda and there are many very important items on tonight's agenda. In many regards the future of our City is at a crossroads. The decisions they make tonight will have a significant influence on future of the City of Edgewater. The Charter needs it to be protected from outside agendas. The Charter is the lifeblood of our City. Protecting our Charter is protecting the heart and soul of our community. He appreciated the hard decisions they would have to make tonight. He asked the Council and public to keep an open mind and make the right decision tonight to bring our City of Edgewater into the future. He thinks they can do that. We have many opportunities available to us. Keep an open mind and look to the future. Unfortunately there are many people who have more fear than vision and they need to break through that fear and they need to create that vision. He knows it is going to be a difficult night tonight. He encouraged the Council to hang in there. John Cordeiro, Pine Tree Drive, asked who owns the City of Edgewater. Councilwoman Rogers stated the people. Mayor Thomas stated the citizens. Mr. Cordeiro asked how come they give everything to the developers and the builders against the people's wishes all the time. Just like Restorations. The people don't want that. They can't even handle the City the way it is now. They are going to double the size of the City. What is that going to do? It Page 3 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 is going to destroy all the trees and the wetlands. Volusia County did a study on all that land and said it was not buildable. How come Edgewater gets a hold of it and they change the zoning and now it is buildable? The Planning & Zoning Board is just a board for the developers and the builders. It is not a board for the citizens of this City. He has watched the Planning & Zoning Board and the Economic Development Board for six years and they haven't done anything. The Chairman doesn't even live in the City. He has a business and it's not even in this City. How do they let that slide through? How do they let them get away with all that? He doesn't think that Restorations should even be built. It is going to destroy all the trees. He remembers some promises from politicians that were going to save the green and the wetlands. He has learned in the last few months watching the TV that politicians are nothing but a bunch of liars. They will tell you anything to get elected. Once they get in, they do just the opposite. That is right from the TV and what is going on in this country now. It is a mess. They pay taxes, the owners of this City, the taxpayers. How can they have an attorney that fights against everything they want, using their money to fight them. That is not right. That is immoral. They get petitions and they vote and she goes to courts and judges and tries to get it turned around. She is supposed to represent the people and do what the people want. He asked if that was hard to do? Very simple. That is why he could never be a politician in this City. Ninety percent of the people all they care about is some kind of money under the table or something. They can't be doing it for good reasons, for what the people want. Dominic Capri a , 606 Topside Circle, agreed with Mr. Lott. One of the things on the ordinances, which he wasn't going to discuss now, does not give enough explanation. He will talk about it at that time. Carol Ann Stoughton, 2740 Evergreen Drive, stated she would like to know if MGM, the persons that have bought the $48,000 acres in ParkTowne have made their payments. Ms. Stoughton stated Lake Helen, it's a shame we don't have the people there on our Council here, except for one Councilwoman. Their tax rate is $4.20 per 1,000. They have no high rises, no Restorations. They have managed development. She feels they should check with the City of Page 4 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 Lake Helen because they are running their city better than us. Ms. Stoughton stated she received a phone call from the tax collector's office whereby Hammock Creek, known as Restorations, is listed as no street in the County, no street in New Smyrna Beach, no street in New Smyrna Beach, no street in the County and no street in the County and she paid over $2,600 in taxes on her home in Edgewater. Here is a developer that has all this land and paid millions of dollars. Guess what they paid in taxes in 2007, a whopping $2,042. If you think this developer is paying his fair share, like all of the citizens are, he is not. The Council is going to cater to and kill this town. The roads presently in our town are in need of repair. She rode through Venetian Bay and every other home is either for sale, unoccupied, or foreclosed. They also decided to give land for schools and their weeds are high. They have a shopping center with two shops in it. The place is like Fulton's Folly out there and that is exactly what we are going to have here. When the Council caters to them and their promises were Mr. Mayor for the people and to keep green. She thinks they forgot their promises. Ben Fanselow, 321 Schooner Avenue, stated he knows they are going to try to change the height elevation. He asked Mr. Attorney to make sure it is okay we need height elevations public works. The word only should be part of that. No other thesaurus should be used so that a business of any type can go over that height limit. Three meetings ago he asked the Council who was behind them and asking them for this change. They gave him a lot of platitudes. They didn't do anything for five or six permits. They didn't issue it because it was in the Charter. He asked what he should call them, non-truth sayers. The other gentleman said they were liars. He doesn't like to use that term. In this case what they did was allow six firms who they denied a permit to come back and sue this town. At the last meeting with the judge, it was so stated that they are violating the State law. How much do you think you should turn around? He again asked who was asking them to change the height elevation and for what reason. He asked them to answer it truthfully this time. Marcia Barnett, 124 Flamingo Road, Chairman, Citizens for a Better Edgewater, stated their mission is to educate Edgewater citizens, community leaders and public officials Page 5 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 on matters affecting the community's quality of life and economic viability. Their educational mission will facilitate bilateral discussions, distribute facts, and mitigate conflicting positions for public good because an informed and educated citizenship makes decisions not based on emotions but on facts. She is proud of the City and feels very fortunate that we have a City Council that makes educated decisions and those decisions are in the best interest of all of our citizenship. She owns a business in Edgewater, she has children and grandchildren, who live here, work here, play here and go to school here, and will hopefully work here when they graduate. Our future and their future will depend on the kind of managed growth that they allow. She spoke of being raised on a working farm in her youth. Gas was $.26 a gallon. For $2 they could feed their whole family meat. It is sad but it is a reality that we have a different environment and economy now. They need to plan for a future where children can walk to school, the elderly can walk to their doctor or pharmacy, workers with the ability to spend less time traveling to other cities for jobs. It comes down to one question. What is our goal for our city? As our elected officials, the Council is capable of leading our city into greatness. The decisions we make here tonight are hard ones on the surface but in reality they are simple. Our Charter must be protected and defended from being hijacked by activists who have no intention of making Edgewater their home. Their only agenda is to further their self interests which do not include the interests of our children and people. She is confident in their leadership and is proud of all of the Council. She is confident in their decision-making ability that it is not emotional but based on facts. S. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Mayor Thomas had nothing at this time due to the lengthy agenda. Councilwoman Rogers was very pleased to report that every time she has a citizen give her a call and they have a question or problem, she immediately e-mails Robin and Robin passes it on to the Department Heads and the Department Heads resolve the problems and then she doesn't have any issues. She was walking one evening and she met one of the citizens that has been constantly complaining about dumping and drug activity near his property and he praised our Interim Police Chief and he thanked her for Page 6 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 turning things over and he is happy they aren't having problems on South Riverside. She reported they are having problems at Menard Park. She has witnessed a couple of things she will be reporting soon. Councilwoman Bennington had nothing at this time. Councilwoman Rhodes stated she and Interim Director of Environmental Services Brenda Dewees attended the Florida League of Cities Conference this past weekend in Tampa and they came up with some very good information. At their visioning workshops she will be bringing forward what she feels are some good ideas that may apply in our City and may help out with our citizens as far as energy concerns and things of that nature. Councilman Cooper had nothing at this time due to the lengthy agenda. 6. CONSENT AGENDA A. Authorization for the Acting Police Chief to apply for the Manatee Conservation Fund Grant to cover costs associated with manatee safety on the water B. Approval of the 2008/2009 Line of Coverage Insurance Premium for property, liability, automobile and public officials insurance for the period of July 1, 2008 through October 1, 2009 Acting City Manager Barlow presented a brief summary on Items A & B of the Consent Agenda. Councilwoman Rhodes moved to approve the Consent Agenda, second by Councilwoman Bennington. The MOTION CARRIED 5 - 0 . 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. 1st Reading, Ordinance No. 2008-0-01, amending Article I, Chapter 11 of the Code of Ordinances to reflect the name change to Business Tax Receipts, fee increase and the addition of the Certificate of Use Permit (Continued from the July 28, 2008 meeting) Page 7 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 City Attorney Ansay read Ord. 2008-0-01 into the record. Acting City Manager Barlow made a staff presentation with regard to Items 7A and 7B. Councilwoman Rhodes stated she has no problem with any of this except for the fee increase. She thinks everyone of them have sat there and said that commercial endeavors in this community are to be encouraged and to be uplifted. She thinks at some point in time they have to put their money where their mouth is and keep their focus on what their goal is. Although this is not a significant increase in licensing fees, she thinks the commercial and the businesses in this City deserve their support. She feels this is a little bit that they can give. She will not vote for this as long as the fee hike is included in it. Councilman Cooper stated this is a 5% raise that has not been increased since 2004. He commented on the increase for some of the classifications and feels they weren't talking about a very high fee. Their expenses have gone up close to 20%. This 5% is needed and he doesn't believe anybody with a business in Edgewater would look upon this as if they are gouging in any way. He would have to support this increase because it is drastically needed to support our City and help the citizens. Councilwoman Bennington agreed with Councilwoman Rhodes and Councilman Cooper. The cost of living has increased. The cost of doing business has increased and in order to cover the taxpayer and not raise the ad valorem taxes, she thinks the 5% increase is very minimal. Since it hasn't been raised in so long she thinks the businesses can just swallow it and afford this minimum amount. Councilwoman Rhodes stated except they are going to pass it on to the consumer so they are going to pay for it anyway. Councilwoman Bennington stated everybody does. That's the way the world works. Councilwoman Rogers stated she was not going to vote for an increase especially since the tax rate went up and especially since there are a lot of people that are losing jobs and she wants to see people have jobs and 5% doesn't seem like a lot. She doesn't think it will help them since Page 8 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 our costs went up 20% to just have a 5% increase. She is going to vote that they stay where they are at for now. Mayor Thomas opened the public hearing. Acting City Manager Barlow reminded Council when they go into this vote, they have to make the name change to Business Tax Receipt. One portion is the rate increase, which he would need a majority plus one for the rate increase. The other part of this is also the implementation of the Certificate of Use. This is a first reading. If they struggle and if they don't have the majority plus one on the rate increase, the Council should let him know and they can make some modifications for the second reading. Modify the rates to stay the same but implement the Certificate of Use and the language for the Business Tax Receipts. Councilwoman Rhodes informed him she thought he just found out they don't have a majority plus one. Acting City Manager Barlow stated he hasn't seen the vote yet but he had an intuition that was the direction it was going. They can make the motion to accept but leave the rates alone. City Attorney Ansay stated this has already been advertised and they have gone through the first reading and continued it. As a general proposition, she always advises caution in changing an ordinance in a dramatic fashion and she thinks going from the increase to no increase is certainly a big change. She thinks given the time constraints they are under to try to get this in concurrence with State Statutes, if that is the direction of Council she thought they could do it and bring it back on second reading with those changes removed. That appears the direction they are going. Councilwoman Bennington stated as a small businesses owner that pays the taxes in the City, the amount it is going to cost her as an individual is so minimal she wouldn't even think about it. As a businesses owner in the City, the rate increase is nothing. Councilwoman Rhodes stated and she said it wasn't a significant increase but she still thinks they deserve Council's support. They sit there all the time and say commercial. They really want to encourage commercial development. They can say that and then turn around and do everything that will stop that. It's not significant but what it says to the people that own Page 9 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 businesses in this City is that the City supports them. Her vote will be no. Ben Fanselow, 321 Schooner Avenue, stated when this was brought up last time he used the simple number of $10. Today he will try to use a real number. You have a small business. You want to give them a $3 increase. Before they pay that $3 worth of taxes they have to sell $75 worth of product because they have to pay the overhead before they make $1 profit. They don't make that profit. They are handing it to the City for taxes. He informed Councilwoman Bennington when she said it's not significant to a small businessperson like herself, she forgot about the overhead, the shipping, and the cost of her employees. Councilwoman Bennington informed him she had not. Mr. Fanselow stated in small businesses that is what a $3 increase is really. It is $75 worth of sales without making one penny of profit. He didn't think they wanted to do that to any business. Chris Balmer, 148 Williams Street, stated he owns some commercial property in the City, which is under a triple net lease. He passes any tax increases on to the tenant. The $5 is not a big deal. However, when you add that $5 to the tax bills he received today and to State Farm's increase and UPS's fuel surcharge, all of that gets passed on to the tenant/businesses and ultimately passed on to the customers. It is trickled down economics in a basic fashion. He appreciated Councilwoman Rhodes comments on walking the talk. We want business in here. Let's show them we really meant it and let's say we are going to hold the line. This City provides great services. They don't mind paying taxes for them. If they have to increase them now and then to give people pay raises they understand that. Where they can hold the line, hold the line even if it is for $5. Mayor Thomas closed the public hearing and entertained a motion. Councilwoman Bennington made a motion to approve Ordinance 2008-0-01 conditioned on removing the fee increases upon second reading, second by Councilwoman Rogers. The MOTION CARRIED 4-1. Councilman Cooper voted NO. Page 10 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 B. 1st Reading, Ordinance No. 2008-0-02, amending Article II, III, IV, V, VIII, IX, XVII, and XIX of the Land Development Code to reflect that Occupational Licenses are now Business Tax Receipts (Continued from the July 28, 2008 meeting) City Attorney Ansay read Ord. 2008-0-02 into the record. Acting City Manager Barlow explained this is essentially changing the language from Occupational License to Business Tax Receipt to be compliant with State Statute. Due to there being no comments, Mayor Thomas opened and closed the public hearing and entertained a motion. Councilwoman Rogers moved to approve Ord. 2008-0-02, amending Article II, III, IV, V, VIII, IX, XVII, and XIX of the Land Development Code to reflect that Occupational Licenses are now Business Tax Receipts, second by Councilwoman Rhodes. The MOTION CARRIED 5 - 0 . Mayor Thomas called a ten-minute recess at this time. The meeting recessed at 7:42 p.m. and reconvened at 7:55 p.m. C. 1st Reading, Ordinance No. 2008-0-10, Hammock Creek Green, LLC, requesting amendments to the Data and Analysis; the Goals, Objectives and policies; the Future Land Use Map and the map series of the Future Land Use Element and other applicable map series contained in the Comprehensive Plan City Attorney Ansay read Ord. 2008-0-10 into the record. Mayor Thomas gave the Council an opportunity at this time to disclose any ex-parte communication they have had concerning this matter. City Attorney Ansay commented on Council being fully empowered and it is lawful for them to have communications with folks outside of the public hearing. Not each other of course, but folks related to the development about a project that is going to be part of a quasi-judicial decision, which is what tonight's proceeding is. Any communications they have had outside of this proceeding or outside of a public meeting related to a Page 11 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 project needs to be disclosed on the record and then they can proceed on with the hearing. Mayor Thomas disclosed he has had about three or four meetings with Mr. Mears, some with his staff. All of the meetings have been here except the last one that was in Orlando, when they attended the VGMC meetings. He had a couple of conversations on the phone with Mr. Mears to line up the meetings. They were done to get him informed about this project. Councilwoman Rogers disclosed she also has had meetings at City Hall with Mr. Mears and it was always just going over brochures, the development. There was one private meeting but had nothing to do with the development directly. He presented to her a situation where someone with his advertising firm had slandered her in reference to an incident that was in the press last year. He was embarrassed and brought that to her attention and let her know that wouldn't happen again. Councilwoman Bennington disclosed she met with Mr. Mears once shortly after she was elected to get an overview of the project and her opinion and he asked her if there was anything in it that she wanted to see that he had included. That was the only time she met wit him. Councilwoman Rhodes stated she has never met with Mr. Mears or anybody else outside of a public forum. Councilman Cooper disclosed he had one meeting shortly after the election with Mr. Mears and the Chairman of the Economic Development Board on a fact finding mission to find about the project of Restorations. Mr. Mears was very cordial and very enthusiastic about his project. He didn't ask his opinion or changes he would make. He did say he would be willing to work with the City. Development Services Director Darren Lear made a staff presentation, which included a description and history of the property. He also commented on staff's recommendation. Ted Brown, Attorney with the firm of Baker & Hostetler, representing Hammock Creek Green LLC, made a presentation on behalf of the applicant. Page 12 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 Brian Canin, Canin & Associates, 500 Delaney Avenue, Orlando, went over the essential map features that are part of their request. He also commented on Sustainable Community Development thresholds and permitted uses and the Master Development Plan. Councilwoman Rhodes stated she is a firm believer in sustainable communities. She feels they have to be in order to live compatibly. Maybe this is not the resolution that this needs to be addressed in. She sees that the potable water they are going to have more wells on their land. She asked if they would be able to use all of the reclaimed water or if they would be dumping it into the river. Mr. Brown informed her it would not be dumped into the river. Councilwoman Rhodes confirmed that all of the water that they flush they will be able to reuse. Mr. Brown informed her that was correct. Councilwoman Rhodes stated granted that new wells for the City of Edgewater are needed to provide water for them and granted they have a CUP that allows for that. They all know the aquifer is becoming depleted and this isn't going to make it any better. She feels there should be a provision for the developer to provide some other means of water for this community, other than the aquifer such as a desalinization plant. She asked if they would have a certain percentage of their houses be solar powered or wind powered. She was looking for some energy savings. She doesn't have a problem with a sustainable community and feels that is the best idea and the way they need to go. She wants to see a provision for depleting the aquifer. She didn't know if this was the place for that provision. Mr. Brown stated he wasn't sure what they were doing here tonight was the right place to deal with it. The issues she raised are issues that are immensely important to this project and should be appropriately dealt with in the context of the development order. What this will do is create a land use that allows them to proceed to a development order for the specifics of the kinds of issues she was talking about. Councilwoman Rhodes stated because the provisions for water are in this does that limit them when they get to the development order that it can only be this way? Mr. Brown stated not in the context of the language that is in there. Page 13 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 City Attorney Ansay concurred that at the stage they are at now that certainly isn't going to be. Councilwoman Rhodes stated it says as it pertains to SR 442 at 1-95, the developer will coordinates with FDOT relative to whether the applicant will make a proportionate share contribution to FDOT or actually construct the improvements. Who makes the decision whether they give a proportionate share to FDOT? Mr. Brown informed her it is made in combination with input from the City, the County and FDOT, depending on which transportation segment is being impacted. When they do a DRI they must under the law account for all of their impacts to the transportation system. Councilwoman Rhodes doesn't want FDOT to make that decision. Mr. Brown stated they don't get to make that decision. They become a participant in the decision if they are attempting to impact an FDOT facility. Councilwoman Bennington asked if there were any changes made to the site plan since the workshop they had. She asked Mr. Brown to specifically point some of the major changes out. Mr. Brown stated what they have done in response to continuing processing of this is they have relocated and moved the conservation hamlet as far to the east as they could and still honor the commitment of no additional impacts to wetlands or other resources. The balance of the plan looks as it would have looked the last time they presented it to them formally or informally. Councilwoman Rogers stated her question pertains to the amount of acreage they have regarding the sustainable community development. She recalled during the workshop that the development would hug 1-95 and out west is going to be where they are going to have the green space. Now when she looks at this and she sees sustainable community development, 4,552 acres, she is thinking they aren't seeing anything yet. If it gets passed here, they might come back and want to change things again and increase what they are going to be developing in this sustainable community, this new term they are hearing. Mr. Brown stated they are coming to a place in the process where it will not be able to change as it has changed. The reason it has changed, as much as she is alluding to until now has been a result of their effort to take the input of all the people they have spoken to, which have been part of the Page 14 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 collaborative planning process that they think is the best and most successful way to bring something of this complexity to a community like Edgewater. From this point forward it cannot change unless Council agrees that it is going to change. He has been doing this a long time and his experience is that any project that has a life span that this one has of 20 years, the City of Edgewater will probably address this property again over it's life and it will attempt to be responsive to and deal with changed circumstances and conditions and somebody representing the developer will stand before Council and attempt to tell them and justify to them what adjustments they might think need to be made. In the short term there is nothing they intend to adjust except to the extent that as they move through this process to the stage of a final hearing they would anticipate receiving more input from the Council and DCA, and the VGMC and to the extent they get that, this plan will be fine tuned and returned to Council for them to decide ultimately if this is the appropriate thing for this real estate in that location within the City of Edgewater. Councilwoman Rhodes stated when she asked if they were going to use all of their reclaimed water and not dump any into the river, they won't dump it into the river. She asked if they would be giving it to the City of Edgewater to dump into the river. This was the question she should have asked. . Mr. Brown informed her no. Councilman Cooper stated he was assuming this was still the same project they looked at in their workshop. He spoke of looking to offset some of the energy and water. They are looking to do as much solar and wind as possible. The homes are five star energy rated. There are all kinds of things they were shown that he assumed were still staying. Mr. Brown informed him that was correct. Councilman Cooper asked about sustainable communities. One of the citizens brought up an example of Venetian Bay and the shopping center has a few shops. A community of this nature and the cost that these homes are going to be, that sustainable community is going to need real corporate jobs in there. He asked for some insight on the types of industrial businesses they are looking for. Mr. Brown stated they certainly have a vision of what they think can be developed here. They also have a vision of a community and project that is part of the larger part of Page 15 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 Edgewater's benefits from this undertaking. They believe and he thinks it will be proven out over time, the synergy of developing a community like this, which is one of a kind in Florida, taking a look downstream from where we are today in this country, looking at energy costs, looking at the ecology and uniqueness of this site and the ability to tell people what they have in the City of Edgewater is they have proximity to 1-95, access to 1-95 north and south of the community, a community that has the largest undeveloped conservation area, fully restored and funded and maintained without being on the tax bill, access to the beaches and intracoastal waterway, and reasonable access to Orlando Regional International Airport for business travel. They think there is a very positive story to tell. Their experience confirms rooftops precede development. They will be aggressive about the task. They have identified companies already but it would be very premature to speculate about those that may have an interest in this type of a location. They do not envision this project can survive or be effective simply on the standard mix of retail uses. They have to find end users that can occupy hundreds of thousands of square feet of office with high paying jobs. That will be a goal and a challenge. Mr. Brown further commented on energy. He believes politicians are now beginning to understand that to transition our energy supply system in this country to the next tier of available energy is going to take some initiative and creativity. It is going to have to make us go get what we have got. Not only as a national security precaution but as a need of making sure we have the supply in hand while we go about the business of developing alternative energy resources to power our economy. Councilman Cooper stated the uniqueness of this community and by uniqueness he meant something that has not been done and the environmental areas being protected and the conservation aspect. He agreed those are all going to generate marketing avenues for this entire community. When that starts to happen they will see the right businesses flow to Edgewater and that is where they will see the progress they are hoping for with this project as long as the uniqueness stays the way it has been presented. Mr. Brown stated they don't see any market alternative. They believe this is a paradigm shift. The notion of building a standardized subdivision will not work as we Page 16 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 move forward. What will work is what they believe they are trying to do. To build an urban environment that is higher density because of the convenience of this type of development. This is the nature of the beast coming forward. If they can do it cooperatively and with enthusiasm Edgewater will have a unique, competitive advantage in this part of Florida as it looks to the future. Mayor Thomas stated they are here to approve or disapprove the future land comprehensive plan and how they evolved here for the citizens that have not participated in the workshops. Mayor Thomas asked how much they will develop out of the 5,100 acres. Mr. Brown informed him it was about 1,700 acres. Mayor Thomas then asked how much they are leaving green and untouched. Mr. Brown informed him the difference between that and about 5,100 acres, 3,400 acres. Mayor Thomas asked Mr. Mears who on the Council has been the worst critic of his plans. Mr. Mears informed him he was. Mayor Thomas asked how much wetlands are going to be destroyed. Mr. Brown stated the acreage number is about 585 acres. Mayor Thomas asked Dr. Dennis if he would consider the wetlands that were going to be destroyed to be fragmented wetlands and some of the wetlands had evolved because that was in civil culture. Dr. Dennis stated the wetlands they are proposing to impact by in large are all part of fragmented wetland systems. The wetlands on this site have been drastically altered. They are proposing to impact those that by in large have been most altered and to restore those and the uplands around them. Mayor Thomas saw that they were digging lots of ponds with connectivity and deep so the water doesn't stagnate. How much acreage was in those ponds? Dr. Dennis stated just under 300. Mayor Thomas commented on only losing a couple hundred acres of wetlands. Mayor Thomas then commented on this being a DRI. Not only are they impacting the citizens of Edgewater they are also impact the citizens of Oak Hill and New Smyrna Beach. All those people have a right to say and this is another factor. He is on the VCOG Smart Growth Committee. This is consistent with the smart growth and the future. Page 17 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 Acting City Manager Barlow asked Dr. Dennis to state his name for the record. Michael Dennis, 330 W. Canton Avenue, Winter Park, President and Senior Scientist with Freelove Dennis & Associates, Environmental Consultants for the project. Mayor Thomas asked how many species of wildlife are going to be left on the property, free to do their thing. Dr. Dennis stated they envision the project if it moves forward as proposed that all of the critters that are out there now and some more would still be on that property 50, 100, and 200 years from now based on the restoration aspects and conservation easements that would be placed on it. Mayor Thomas asked about the walking trails and riding trails and if the citizens of Edgewater would be able to use those. Dr. Dennis informed him those would be open to the public. Councilwoman Rogers stated as she understands this starts the process. They are still going to need required permits. They have quarterly reports of every development that they have coming through the city and they receive updates as to what is required. The additional permits that will need to be done for this project to go forward is St. Johns, Fish & Wildlife, DOH, DEP, FDOT and of course Volusia County. They have to go through those processes as well. Her concern isn't enough to say no or yes to this. Right now what they are doing is they are just starting the process. There are some buzzwords they have to remember as Council. He. has enough credible evidence within everything for them to approve and push this along in the process. If they were to disapprove this they would have to have competent substantial evidence to go against it. Nothing has been presented to her or to them to indicate that there is some competent substantial evidence to go against this. The things that have been brought to their attention in the workshops and the paperwork they have in front of them indicates this would be a wonderful project. Her concern and she is expressing this now so as they are going forward people that are for this and people that are against this will hear it. Those people that are going to try to sway them or try to convince them to vote one way or the other has to bring evidence forward to them. They can't vote on emotions and have to vote on the evidence in front of them. She isn't an advocate of the term smart growth. She is an Page 18 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 advocate of the fact that land is a precious commodity. They have a development in front of them. Population is going to come into this area. This appears to be a project that is going to be viable for the City of Edgewater and it would be positive. She sees a lot of similarities with this community based upon perhaps the New England states. They are getting into areas where it is high density and a lot of green space. She has a father that is a senior and one of the things he is desiring in his old age that she has to start thinking of is he wants to be able to walk to the grocery store and visit the library and not have to rely on public transportation. She spoke of a lot of this land being environmental resource corridor. Property taxes on this land are roughly $2,000 verses a homeowner in Florida Shores that is paying $2,600 as was mentioned by one taxpayer. The land has a lot of environmental issues. They are going to have to rely upon these other agencies to review that paperwork. They are not environmentalists or scientists. They are going to have or rely on other agencies to tell them this land is not suitable. They are not up there to determine if this land is suitable or not suitable. They are going to be making some votes tonight and she wants the public to understand that she is going to have to vote with her head, competent substantial evidence, instead of her heart. She wouldn't want this land to be developed but she can't vote that way. If people are going to want to continue to call and express things they are going to have to come back and give competent substantial evidence. They can deal with these other agencies that are going to be making these determining factors so that they can do their" job on Council and they have to do it based on the evidence. What they have in front of them is what they have. Councilwoman Bennington asked if they were familiar with the development Vierra in Brevard County. Mr. Brown informed her he was generally speaking. Councilwoman Bennington stated it encompasses Melbourne and runs into Rockledge and Cocoa and Brevard County and runs right up the interstate. That was all wetlands. From what she sees of it it isn't anything like what they are proposing. Mr. Brown stated it certainly is not. That represents the old paradigm. That is not what they are about. Mr. Brown stated one of the reasons they should vote yes this evening is because they now formally engage the process. These agencies about what she is seeking to get Page 19 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 their input, comments and understanding will flow from a yes vote this evening. A no vote means the process does not move forward and they are struck where they are. This is a critical time in the process. They will have to persuade St. Johns River Water Management District, the Florida Fish & Wildlife Commission, the United States Army Corp of Engineers, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. The Endangered Species Act criteria will have to be sustained and met. All of those agencies process their affairs in public. The DRI process is a very transparent process that allows of a lot of points of entry for a lot of people over a long period of time. This is the first of multiple public hearings that they will be in front of Council as this process continues to mature. Councilwoman Rhodes commented on what is going on with China and Indian and how the natural resource of oil is being depleted globally. There is going to come a time where they are going to need to live where they work, go to the doctor, shop and go to school. She thinks this is probably the first step. She was sure 20 years down the road there will be something way more technically appropriate than this but right now this is state of the art. She thinks they would be remiss if they did not encourage this. She would still like to talk about the whole water thing when they get to the development order. Mayor Thomas opened the public hearing. The following citizens spoke: Mike Visconti, 316 Pine Breeze Drive, stated now they have heard the future from the experts. He wrote down development petition, one house per twenty acres was ridiculous. Here again a developer Mr. Don Mears Jr. who owns the 5,181 acres is willing to develop and only 25% of it is going to be developed and the rest is going to be green. He heard there was going to be 1,700 acres developed, which leaves 3,481 acres that are going to be green. This in no way is going to affect the City. First it is west of 1-95. All of the transportation will be north and south of 1-95. East and west will be SR 44. To go to the beach is going to be 1-95 and SR 44. What is the problem? This project is going to enhance Edgewater, improve the economy, give jobs to all the trades, give jobs to citizens of Edgewater, the citizens of Edgewater will be going there to shop instead of coming here because we have Page 20 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 no shopping centers here. from the experts and have to the Council. He thinks that they have heard heard the future and now it is up Mr. visconti" stated there are government grants that is $4 billion for the communities such as Edgewater to purchase foreclosed homes, renovate them and resell them. He asked that the grant person for the City look into it. Mark Rakowski, Development Services Director for the City of New Smyrna Beach, commended the City and the developer for the proposal that takes advantage of compact urban growth. This is not the typical urban sprawl they have seen. It is important to get urban growth and keep it walkable. Hopefully this will be something that other communities see as a model and continue to encourage. The City of New Smyrna Beach has some concerns about the proposal. The main issue is that they are concerned that this project is going to negatively impact the City of New Smyrna Beach. When they do a Comprehensive plan amendment, they entitle the developer to whatever they are asking for if they give them the comp plan designation. They shouldn't say let's give them the designation and worry about the details later. It doesn't work that way. Once they give them the Comprehensive Plan amendment they need to make sure they can take care of all of the issues that need to be taken care of. Mr. Rakowski stated the City of NSB had done quite a few development proposals west of 1-95 so he didn't think it was right to say to Edgewater they have theirs but Edgewater can't have theirs. They work together to make sure their things are addressed. Some of the specific issues that they are concerned about are water and traffic. He feels they need to make sure Phase 1 of this project participates in proportionate share funding. They are concerned about wetlands and the impacts it has because of the water flowing to the north. They are concerned about drainage and population projections. He encouraged the cities to work together and hopefully this will be an excellent project. Acting City Manager Barlow commented on some of the dialog he had with the City of New Smyrna Beach Commission. He gave a commitment that they certainly want to be good neighbors and continue to work projects concurrently through there. They have recognized some indifferences. Page 21 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 They may feel they have some impact in traffic and what they may have vested as future projects and really truly vested projects with development orders. He feels committed the City of Edgewater can continue to be good neighbors and work with our neighboring communities of NSB and any impact in the unincorporated areas of Edgewater as well. He felt the developers were also on board and committed to work those through. At the end of the day they aren't going to go forward until a majority of everybody is satisfied. They have jointly participated in proportionate fair share funding studies. He feels confident there are working relationships within this region and he feels confident they can continue to enhance those working relationships. Ben Fanselow, 321 Schooner Avenue, stated he liked the plan. He didn't know where they got their demographics but that plan is like a photograph. Take a model she looks gorgeous. Put her on a seascape and sand and the wind and the light can change the perspective of her totally. He would like the gentleman to show a plan where they are bringing in these businesses and put them in first, then go to putting in the buildings. They can use the work in this place. He is glad it is going to take 18 or 20 years. He would like them to really have a plan. That is just an overview. It's not a plan. A plan shows every part and every phase of the building before you have a plan because if you don't plan that way when the oak tree gets in the way of the bulldozer they are going to have to change their plan. They are going to have this business down 1-95. 1- 95 to the airport can take you an hour or hour and fifteen minutes or an hour and a half and if you project more traffic on that it is going to take you longer and the Daytona airport isn't going to supply the planes for the businesses they are talking about. They may have other types of businesses but don't tell him about the ability to get to that airport. The thing is the plan has to be more complete than what they are looking at for it to actually know that it works. They are just looking at a smudge. It is a good smudge. Looks perfect but it has no detail. It's like looking at a car without a motor. It doesn't go any place. To do proper planning you have to put down everything you want to happen. Since he has done planning, which was his business his whole life, he thinks they are missing the boat on this. Before the Council goes ahead they need a complete plan. Page 22 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 Carol Ann Stoughton, 2740 Evergreen Drive, stated goals and companies that are willing to come here should come first. They should have the promise of jobs. Are we going to hire the local person who is in foreclosure? Did they hire them when they built Coral Trace? The answer is no. In the Orlando Sentinel Mr. Mears said he would try to comply with green standards but didn't make any promises. She felt the best plan for out there would be stadiums, athletic fields, even a great big facility to house people in case of disaster. Windmills out there. The goals are not for the people who already live in Edgewater to build another city to hire more people, more famine, more police, more police buildings, more pensions. Everybody deserves a decent pay but who is going to pay for that when the developer leaves? As far as she is concerned is the developer going to pay when he leaves on the infrastructure that he leaves for the current people to have to absorb. It is very interesting to note. Are they going to pay for all of this infrastructure? In the beginning they weren't going to pay to make SR 442 go across and now they are going to pay for that. She lived in St. Lucie and they are doing the same thing they did there. They ruined the City. It takes an hour to get to the opposite side of u.S. #1. The taxes have gone up and the crime has increased. It is also interesting to note how clever the developer was to proceed with his two candidates and now she sees Mr. Canin who contributed highly to one or two of the candidates and she didn't think those candidates should vote having received moneys for their vote. Kathy Booth, 2204 Tamarind Drive, Conservation Chairperson for the Southeast Volusia Audubon Society, addressed a few environmental concerns. Southeast Volusia Audubon Society remains very concerned about Restoration sitting on top of the Volusia sole source aquifer with resulting fresh water pollution and depletion of fresh water for the citizens of Edgewater. They also think the development is not totally consistent with environmental sensitivity specifically referring to the conservation hamlet which is going to consist of approximately 500 homes and therefore probably 1,000 or more people that is in the middle of the 3,300 acres of conservation land. The developer could do better by either preferably removing the conservation village from the plans or at minimum building it last in Phase III instead of Phase I. Restoring the land from silviculture is a commendable idea but the fact is the land is already being well used by wildlife as evidenced by the developer's Page 23 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 own surveys. During a swallowtail kite survey in May 2008 tracts of Florida's largest mammals, deer, bobcat and bear were all readily seen. In the process of "restoration" which will include much earth moving and burning, the habitat of wildlife in those areas will be destroyed. Where will these animals go while their habitat is being "restored"? After the "restoration" will these animals return and will the people by then residing in the development especially in the conservation hamlet or village want the wildlife to return particularly if the wildlife includes bears. To see a bear in ones new backyard maybe novel but the novelty will rapidly dissipate when the bears curiosity causes it to destroy a person's things or pets. The Florida Fish & wildlife Commission biologist she spoke to agreed that it is inevitable that they will be called about conflicts between bears and Restoration conservation village residents and inevitably they will be forced to euthanize the bears because there is no place to relocate bears. The Southeast Volusia Audubon Society requests a response to their recommendation and also this was recommended at their Regional Conservation Committee meeting recently that the conservation village be removed from the plans or at minimum be built in phase III instead of Phase I. John Cordeiro, pine Tree Drive, stated he read in the paper that Restoration is going to pull water out of Edgewater's wells for their 8,500 homes. He asked if that was true. Mr. Brown informed him yes. Mr. Cordeiro asked what happens when we get a drought and those wells run dry feeding 8,5000 more homes. What happens to our water? We lose it. Real nice huh. Dot Carlson, 1714 Edgewater Drive, stated she could not have said it better than Kathy Booth. She has been out on the land and it is wet. She has been told bears don't have bank accounts and they don't have pockets but some of them may need some jobs. Venetian Bay is a joke and it is an absolute destruction of the land. What is out there is destroyed. Where will the wildlife go? She suggested they would go to the interstate and commit suicide. Usually that is what happens. Bob Lott, 2112 S. Riverside Drive, stated this falls directly in the category he talked about earlier, fear verses vision. This project is an evolution. It has evolved tremendously because of input from the City and Page 24 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 other agencies. It will continue to do that. The Planning & Zoning Board voted unanimously to approve this project. The same gentleman who said the Chairman of the Economic Development Board didn't reside in the City also criticized them for doing nothing for the last six years. They are looking at an opportunity for 3.2 million square feet of retail industrial space. He spoke of having the businesses coming first and then they can build the houses. If he can find a business that will relocate to a tent, they will try and do that. This is a tremendous opportunity for the City of Edgewater. He urged Council to pursue this opportunity and continue to let it run its course. This is state of the art. This is an opportunity for them to really move forward. He didn't want them to allow the few people who can't seem to grasp the vision to stop this project. He talked to a lot of people in Edgewater and they have been working at bringing jobs into this community for many years. One of the problems they have is they don't have any space for them to relocate to. This is the opportunity for them to get that space. Give this opportunity a chance for survival. Linda DeBorde, 305 S. pine Street, New Smyrna Beach, mentioned paying a lot of taxes to the City of Edgewater. She applauded them for being where they are today. They have brought this project this far. Can you imagine 18 to 20 years out where this project might be? Her children and grandchildren live in the City of Edgewater and they are excited about this project. They have to start somewhere to make things happen. They have this started. She urged them to keep it moving. This is economic development that they have all been looking for in Southeast Volusia. Pat Card, 3019 willow Oak Drive, stated many people have never seen a really good development. A really good development, one that is coordinated and done well, doesn't happen over night. It takes 20 years. If you want to see a good one, there is a little town in Texas called Spring Texas. Twenty years ago Spring Texas had a grocery store with the post office in the back. It was just a little community. The Woodlands is there and the Woodlands is the development that is a sustainable community also. It went in and started about 20 years ago. You drive into the Woodlands and you have a hard time telling you are in the middle of a development. It is a monster but it is beautifully done and it is well coordinated and it was a show place and it was state of the art 20 years ago when Page 25 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 they said something the art this year. years and they will valuable to them. about it. This is going to be state of It will evolve over the next twenty have something that he believes will be Please vote in favor of this tonight. Don Picard, 1530 Queen Palm Drive, stated this is a really beautiful project when you see the evolution from where it started to where it is now it is wonderful. If it were in Miami or Orlando that would be fine. This doubles the size of Edgewater. At the same time Reflections is coming behind 900 acres. All of the rest of the developments they are going to allow between now and then are going to grow up as well. He commented on the traffic that is backed up on SR 44 on the weekends from the people that are going to the beach. In a recent issue of the Edgewater newsletter, the City encouraged people to conserve water for future generations. It is never going to make it to future generations. It will come to people that they are going to allow to come into the City. Our educational facilities are already over crowded. Volusia County is closing several schools this year and several more over the next few years. They are going to build schools here but at what point and how is this going to be phased in with our schools in terms of being able to satisfy the needs of the current students of Edgewater. How does development impact their taxes? How much of the infrastructure are they going to have to pay in advance to allow this development to come in? A recent article in the New Journal talked about Florida regulators being asked to approve increased fees for the public utilities, power companies, because they want to use these moneys ultimately to build new power sources. This is a matter of paying in advance. They pay now so they can build power plants in the future for people that will be here in the future, not for us. will the City develop building codes for minimizing fossil fuel power consumption? If this is going to be truly an environmentally friendly community will they require solar water and heat? will they require co generation or sustainable houses so people don't die of heat exhaustion during power. outages? 1-95 is the only major corridor into and out of the era. Can you imagine the gridlock if they had to evacuate all of these people in the case of an emergency? What about the impact on wildlife? The area in question is replete with bears and there is no reason to believe the bears will stay in their allocated location. Once their home ranges are fragmented they will find themselves in backyards because they are easy feeders. Page 26 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 Garbage cans are great. They will be killed because there is no where to put them and man will once again demonstrate his prelis to kill animals just to get his way. Mayor Thomas stated they are beating a dead horse. Mayor Thomas closed the public hearing and entertained a motion. Councilwoman Bennington moved to adopt Ordinance 2008-0-10, Hammock Creek Green, LLC, requesting amendments to the Data and Analysis; the Goals, Objectives and Policies; the Future Land Use Map and the map series of the Future Land Use Element and other applicable map series contained in the Comprehensive Plan, second by Councilwoman Rhodes. The MOTION CARRIED 5 - 0 . D. 2nd Reading, Ordinance No. 2008-0-07, providing for an amendment of the City Charter, Section 3.04 "Election and Terms" (Continued from the July 28, 2008 meeting) City Attorney Ansay read Od. 2008-0-07 into the record. Acting City Manager Barlow made a staff presentation. Mayor Thomas stated this was recommended by Ann McFall to make it easier on her and to save the City $16,000. They are going to give it to the voters if they want to keep the odd numbered years or the even numbered years. Bob Lott, Chairman, Charter Review Committee, stated it was a recommendation by Ann McFall, Supervisor of Elections, that they adopt this even year election term. A couple of them they are going to impose upon them to serve a little longer than they signed up for but they believe it is important not only for the $13,000 the Mayor has eluded to. That cost will probably go up over the years. That is our current cost. We will save that cost initially and most cost in the future. We have a very low turnout in odd numbered years. When we have very important issues on the ballot whether they be Charter amendment issues or just voting for Council people, we end up having 1,400 to 1,500 people in a City of 20,000 plus making these decisions. On even numbered years since they are coupled with general, national and state elections we tend to have double the Page 27 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 turnout. The feeling is they will get better representation at the ballot box of the citizens of Edgewater. There are other advantages to going to this even year election. Mayor Thomas opened the public hearing. The following citizen spoke: Dominic Capri a , 606 Topside Circle, stated he wanted to talk about the $16,000 they would be saving. If they think they are going to save the $16,000 they are dreaming because they are not. He was sure they would be paying more to the County when they have to pick up the work. He believes that everyone on the Council is really interested in the City. He made a recommendation the last time and didn't hear a word from any of them if it was good or bad. He recommended that if they really believe in the City and they can go to even numbered years each Councilmember could submit a resignation at due time and then run for office. That was to bring them to the even numbered years. They were elected for four years and not five years and one month. He would like them to give that some consideration. At least tell him what they think. No one responded. Mr. Capria stated nothing, that's what he thought. Councilwoman Rhodes stated she didn't think he wanted to know. Mayor Thomas thought it was the most ignorant thing he has ever heard in his life. Councilwoman Rogers stated she thought it was 9:25 p.m. and they needed to vote so let's get on with it. Mayor Thomas closed the public hearing. Councilwoman Rhodes moved to approve Ord. 2008-0-07, providing for an amendment of the City Charter, Section 3.04 UElection and Terms", second by Councilwoman Bennington. The MOTION CARRIED 4 -1. Councilwoman Roqers voted NO. Page 28 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 E. 2nd Reading, Ordinance No. 2008-0-08, providing for an amendment of the City Charter by deleting Section 1.01 (a) (1) (Continued from the July 28, 2008 meeting) City Attorney Ansay read Ord. 2008-0-08 into the record. Acting City Manager Barlow made a staff presentation. Bob Lott, Chairman, Charter Review Committee, stated every five years sitting Council elects one person from their district and the Mayor elects one at large and they sit down and review their City Charter. They do that because it is an evolution. Things change. They need to look at the Charter to make sure they are staying in step with everything that is happening countywide, statewide and nationwide. This was a very serious issue with their board. They have had the opportunity since they invoked the initial 35-foot height limitation to see what the effects are. Initially that was a very emotional vote. It passed by 51 to 49. Not exactly a referendum or a mandate. A year later when they went back and once people realized what that meant, they went back and said to let them take out the public buildings, industrial, and commercial buildings and it was a resounding 73% who said they kind of made a mistake and let's don't do that. Since that time they have had the opportunity to witness another city who has adopted this type of restriction in their City Charter. They are finding that this is not the optimum way to govern a community. They are not and never have been a pure democracy. They are a democracy by representation. We elect officials to study items and make the right decisions for them and if they don't they have the opportunity to replace those elected officials and move forward. St. Pete Beach adopted this resolution and the Mayor has since come back and said it stifled the town. They can't keep up with state mandated growth issues because every single thing has to go to a referendum vote. Every citizen has to research and understand every item on that ballot. That isn't what they signed up for in this country when they talk about a democracy. They are finding it has been very restrictive and they find the Land Development Code does not do well in the City Charter. We already have a 35-foot height limit in the Land Development Code and uphold. In order to get around that, there are many steps they have to go through to make that happen. By adding the almost insurmountable step of educating and explaining to every citizen that is Page 29 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 going to vote what the total ramification of each amendment to that particular Charter ordinance would be and they are finding out it is insurmountable. It stifles any opportunity to do intelligent growth. Give them an opportunity to educate the public and to go out and explain to people what the total ramification is of the decision and give them a chance to vote on it again. They were unanimous on that and they are standing firm. Councilwoman Rogers stated they have 23 residential projects on the books right now. They are not yet developed. We have commercial projects that are sitting there that haven't yet started. We have a few that have started. This 35-foot height restriction hasn't stopped them. Other things have stopped them at this point. At some point the 23 residential projects will come to pass as well as the ones they have on the books for commercial. The restriction hasn't limited that. If all of these developments were going on and permits had been pulled and things were happening and then they were actually stifling in this economy then maybe they should consider this 35- foot height coming out of the Charter. How did it get in the Charter? Citizens signed petitions and it was voted. It was 51% and 49%. The people that were trying to get the petitions, trying to get the 35 foot height amendment didn't have the economic resources to do the advertising or marketing that those that wanted the 35 foot height removed had. The City funds were working against the citizens that signed those petitions. She feels it needs to stay right where it's at for now. Let's say these 23 residential projects get passed and the commercial projects we have on hand happen and everything is fully built and when they are actually stifling that is when they need to revisit it. Not right now. This is premature. The citizens voted for it. She feels they are beating the dog. Councilwoman Bennington stated anyone that wants to put building code requirements in our Charter does not understand the Charter or the building code or our Comp Plan. We do not have a democracy. We have a republic. They are elected to represent the citizens. They cannot govern by petition. It doesn't work. It did for our founders but it doesn't work in this day and age. This issue may not be affecting us right now but it will in the future and if they just let it sit they will have to address it in the future. The Charter Committee recommends this. Every five years they form. They need to get this Page 30 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 out of the Charter. The Charter is the skeleton our government is based on. It is not made to fill in all these little whims and put ordinances and codes in there. That is not what the Charter is for. If they can't as a city enforce our Codes and our Comp Plan then they are in serious trouble if they have to go to the Charter to make the employees and Council enforce that. This needs to come out. At least it needs to be voted on to come out. She feels very strongly about this. She has served on several Charter committees in this City. Councilman Cooper thinks Councilwoman Bennington and Councilwoman Rogers brought up issues from both sides. They are trying to micro manage departments that have been there for years for people that have been elected and micro management doesn't work. If they are going to micro manage everybody through the Charter their Charter will be hundreds of pages long. They have to trust the directors of the City to bring a project forward. They have to trust them to do their job. It is in there already and is already protecting us. Why are they afraid of voting on this? He loves the fact that they let the citizens vote. If they voted it in and maybe it wasn't enough funds or education if they are better educated now and the citizens have a better handle or a lesser of a handle or they like it or don't like it he doesn't understand. Just let them vote. He trusts the citizens of Edgewater to make an honest decision. Councilwoman Rhodes stated she isn't going to ask them to trust any City official, or to trust any department head or any employee of the City. She is going to ask them to trust the voters. They can put this on the ballot every time it comes up if they want to and whatever the will of the people is will be the will of the people. Put it on the ballot and allow the voters their voice. Mayor Thomas stated he was instrumental in getting this in the Land Development Code where he feels it belongs. He doesn't think it belongs in the Charter although he has received a lot of comments so what he started doing is poll the public. It was a very close vote. It was 51% to 49%. He commented on the people he has polled being pro or they are negative against it. There is no in between. It's a 50/50 deal. What he doesn't like is they put it on the ballot one time and the people went out and voted for it. If you don't vote, don't gripe. He has voted since he was Page 31 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 21 years old. This reminds him of a bunch of kids getting together and say let's vote on this and the vote comes back and they don't like it so they vote again. He feels that sends the wrong perception. The people voted on something. He is going to vote no not to send it back to the ballot. Councilwoman Rogers stated the condo, the suit that was filed against the city. If this 35-foot height would have bee in the Charter could the developer have sued the City? City Attorney Ansay stated developers always have a great advantage in coming up with ways to sue the City. She didn't handle the case but thought it would have been a different case and probably a lot stronger for the City had that issue been resolved. Councilwoman Rhodes stated it wasn't in the Land Development Code then. City Attorney Ansay stated the problem wasn't whether it was in the Charter or not. It wasn't evidenced in any function of City law. That is where the real rub came in that suit. Had it been established clearly in the Land Development Code or the Charter she thinks it surely would have strengthened the City's position. Councilwoman Rogers stated the City has been sued before when things were in the Land Development Code and developers have come forward wanting a variance. If it is in the Charter, the City is protected from those potential lawsuits. City Attorney Ansay stated the Charter is definitely the most supreme document. They have to go through a whole lot of work to amend it and get around it. There are variance procedures described in dealing with can they get around the height restriction. Just because it was in the Charter it didn't end everyone's ability to come forward and claim that they are vested from it and that they should be allowed to proceed. At the end of the day it is law beyond the City that will determine whether these property owners have vested rights and should be able to proceed. She thinks the proponents of the measure would certainly argue that by having it in the Charter it is a lot less likely to be curtailed by staff and future Councils along the line. She feels that is accurate on what they believe and that is why they put it there. Councilwoman Rhodes stated maybe future populations of the City won't think the way they do now. Why do you hamstring them? City Attorney Ansay stated that is really more of a policy and less of a legal debate. At the end of the day Page 32 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 they have the one argument. If they don't make the right decision people would say they would throw them out of office but they don't put the whole LDC into the Charter. She felt probably ECARD and the folks that support this would say they put it in the Charter because this Council or their predecessors weren't doing their job. They are both valid arguments. Either way there are ways around it. It definitely is an unusual place to have a land use restriction like this but there are other cities that have them. Councilwoman Rogers felt the point that needed to be looked at was we do have a number of residential developments that are not yet complete as well as commercial projects that are not yet complete. Let's have those built. Let's see what the impact is. Right now they have so much on the books that hasn't happened they have to see these developments come through. They have been approved without a 35-foot height restriction and some are vested and can go a little beyond that. They aren't there yet. She feels this is premature to be put on the ballot at this time. Mayor Thomas opened the public hearing. The following citizens spoke: Dominic Capri a , 606 Topside Circle, stated they voted already. How many times are they going to vote? The City Charter as he understand it they look at it every five years. This hasn't been in the Charter for five years. The way it explains it on there they are going to confuse the public. He didn't think this wording should be put on the ballot. The citizens voted. The Comp Plan and the LDC has the building heights in it so they say it is in there so let's take it out of here. Once they get it out of here what do you think you are going to do? You are going to fight to take it out of the Land Development Code and Comp Plan. They are taking a step at a time. There they go with the building heights to the sky. That is exactly what is going to happen. They keep saying 12%, which is very true and he has worked on the polls for years. That is high because the citizens of Edgewater don't trust the council. He talks to people and they say what's the use of voting. They are going to do what they want to do anyway. His comment is if you didn't vote, don't bitch. Page 33 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 Ted Brown, Baker & Hostetler, stated he has a firm conviction that government needs to be run by its representatives. That means the people at this dais now and in the future. The question was raised it's been voted on and how many times will it be voted on again? It will be voted on again as often as there are people who desire to do something different and if the only way they can do it is to go back and get another referendum they could be doing it he didn't know how many times. The real question is do they want to reclaim the ability of your city to run itself from the dais as opposed from the ballot box. If this 35-foot height limitation is not removed the project they voted to transmit tonight cannot be built. It's an important vote. It is a defining vote for the future for what they talked about west of 1-95. He urged the Council to give careful consideration allowing that to go back to the people to see whether or not they believe in the vision, which they have put forth for this community. They are going to participate as citizens in helping to educate them and helping them to understand what this is about. When this initially surfaced in the community it was really about protecting the riverfront. It came back before the people when the expansion of it was understood and they removed a part of it. Now there is an ongoing need for them to be able to review, consider, digest, modify, approve and deal with as a Council whatever anybody brings in front of them because they have been elected by the residents of this community to do so. If they want to see that right by not allowing the people to speak on this now with an informed contender to help educate on the other side that is their prerogative. He urged the Council in the strongest way he could to send this back to the electorate now so they can understand whether they have a project or not in November. Bob Lott, 2112 S. Riverside Drive, stated Councilwoman Rogers said let's wait until we are stifled and then let's deal with it. He has never in all his life run his personal affairs that way. He proactively has vision and looks to the future that things are going to change. He spoke of Councilwoman Rhodes saying she envisions a point in time where people need to live where they work. He commented on needing to create vertical density, which may require projects that have retail at the bottom, office space on one or two floors with residential areas above. He urged the Council to give themselves the opportunity to make these decisions. Take it out of the Charter where it Page 34 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 doesn't belong. Let the people decide again. this twenty times because things change. They may do Carol Ann Stoughton, 2740 Evergreen Drive, stated whether they were voted in by one vote or 100 votes, that is the way it went. It belongs in the Charter. She would like to know how much it cost us for our Attorney to not allow the density question to be put on the ballot, which was not ambiguous? Mayor Thomas asked what that had to do with 35-foot. Ms. Stoughton stated because they have it back on the ballot. She stated this all started with fireworks given to the Fire Company and when this developer first started his development he had no mention of six stories high. You can see what is going on here. They carefully placed their people in office. She hoped Mr. Barlow didn't decide to pay another company to come in and educate the people to the developer's way of thinking. The people know what is going on. Bill Glaser,' 1703 Needle Palm Drive, asked if he understood one of the Council said that because we live in a republic that the people do not have the right to petition their government. Councilwoman Bennington stated that was not what she said. Mr. Glaser stated when the Council doesn't do what the citizens' feel is in their best interest, then if they want to petition them for something then they will petition them for something. If it is to change the Charter, if they get enough petitions and get it on the ballot and the people vote for it then it will go in the Charter. Just because the voters voted for the 35-foot height limit the whole United States is in a depression. If they want to petition the Council they will petition them. Councilwoman Rhodes stated and they absolutely should but that doesn't mean they don't listen to the other 20,000 voters. Marcia Barnett, 124 Flamingo Road, stated the term smart growth is our future. In communities across the nation there is this growing concern about the current development patterns that some call sprawl. We have it in Florida Shores. There are no longer in long term interests of our cities, our suburbs, small towns, rural communities or Page 35 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 wilderness areas that cannot protect anybody, that kind of sprawl. The features that distinguish smart growth vary from place to place but in general new smart growth is more town-centered, transit and pedestrian oriented and has a greater mix of housing, commercial and retail uses. It also preserves open space and many other environmental amenities. Restoration is the perfect smart growth example however the 35 foot height requirement in the Charter threatens to prevent these smart growth principles form occurring and exposing the project as well as other good projects to uncertainty that would prohibit the City from recruiting new businesses and creating new jobs. This height limit is already in the Land Development Code. If you have been given the authority to safeguard our community's quality of life through their decision making efforts she encouraged the council to accept the recommendations from their own appointed review committee of Edgewater citizens and take the height limit from the Charter and let the voters decide on its merits. The affirmation vote on this legal measure will send a strong message that our City's best days are our own and our own smart growth are just ahead. Mayor Thomas closed the public hearing and entertained a motion. City Attorney Ansay wanted to make note that at the bottom of Page 2 of 6 the section they are referencing in the Charter is Section 1.01 (a) (1). There was at the bottom of Page 2 of 6, it was listed as Section 1.10, which should be Section 1.01. Any motion let's make it contingent on that one change, switching those two numbers around. Councilwoman Bennington moved to accept Ord. 2008-0-08 as in their agenda, deleting Section 1.01. Councilwoman Rhodes stated changing 1.10 to 1.01. City Attorney Ansay stated it is deleting Section 1.01. It is just that in the ordinance there was one case where there was a type-o and it was listed as Section 1.10. Councilwoman Rhodes stated she thought she wanted that mentioned in the motion. City Attorney Ansay stated deleting the correction section. Councilwoman Bennington moved to accept Ord. 2008-0-08, deleting Section 1.01, second by Councilwoman Rhodes. The MOTION CARRIED 3 -2. Mayor Thomas and Councilwoman Roqers voted NO. Page 36 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 Mayor Thomas called a fifteen-minute recess at this time. The meeting recessed at 9:50 p.m. and reconvened at 10:05 p.m. F. Resolution No. 2008-R-08, adopting the Environmental Core Overlay (ECO) Map, formerly known as Map "A" City Attorney Ansay read Res. 2008-R-08 into the record. Acting City Manager Barlow made a staff presentation. Mayor Thomas stated basically all they have done is change the name. They are also trying to adopt the Turnbull Hammock System in that map. Mayor Thomas opened the public hearing. The following spoke: Clay Henderson, Riverside Drive, New Smyrna Beach, stated he has been involved in this issue for some time. He made the Council aware of the amount of time the Mayor has been spending on this over the last several years. He feels they have made a lot of progress. This map has been a consensus effort and everybody has come together around this. The County transmitted its Comp plan last week. The City has transmitted the Restoration amendments tonight so they will be going along a parallel path. What is unique about this is that the County identified in its map about 1,100 acres in the City of Edgewater that is part of ECO and under what they voted to transmit earlier tonight, that will all be designated as conservation. As this goes forward and there will be lots of discussion about this they can hold their hats high that they are the first city in Volusia County to take this effort. Mayor Thomas closed the public hearing and entertained a motion. Councilman Cooper made a motion to approve Res. 200B-R-OB, adopting the Environmental Core Overlay (ECO) Map, formerly known as Map UA", second by Councilwoman Rhodes. The MOTION CARRIED 5 - 0 . Page 37 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 G. Resolution No. 2008-R-09, opposing Niagara Bottling LLC's Consumptive Use Permit Application with St. John's River Water Management District City Attorney Ansay read Res. 2008-R-09 into the record. Acting City Manager Barlow made a staff presentation. Councilwoman Rhodes stated they want commercial but not this. Councilwoman Bennington stated she heard on television that there is a lot of cities that are doing this with these bottling companies and not allowing them to do it. Councilwoman Rhodes couldn't believe this whole proposition would be considered by anybody. Mayor Thomas opened the public hearing. The following citizen spoke: Ferd Heeb, 115 N. Riverside Drive, asked the Council to please pass this and that they would save him a trip to Palatka. To say his wife is encouraging him to attend the public hearing is an understatement. Now he can tell her the whole City is behind it. Mayor Thomas closed the public hearing and entertained a motion. Councilwoman Rhodes moved to approve Res. 200B-R-09, opposing Niagara Bottling LLC's Consumptive Use Permit Application with St. John's River Water Management District, second by Councilwoman Rogers. The MOTION CARRIED 5 - 0 . H. Resolution No. 2008-R-10, authorizing and directing that the Charter amendment related to density west of 1-95 proposed by Edgewater Citizens' Alliance for Responsible Development, Inc. be submitted to the electors of the City of Edgewater at the November 4, 2008 General Election City Attorney Ansay read Res. 2008-R-10 into the record. Page 38 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 City Attorney Ansay stated several months ago the City authorized the filing of a declaratory action to resolve the legal issues related to the proposed Charter amendment presented by ECARD to be placed on the ballot. The amendment permitted or restricted and that was one of the big issues density west of 1-95 to one unit per 20 acres. The petitions were submitted to the City. At that time the interested and effected land owners west of 1-95 brought forth a number of legal issues and challenged whether or not the measure was legal or not. In order to avoid taking the process in our own hands, since there were legitimate concerns we filed that declaratory action to ask the court what do we do. We are caught between two very opposing sides. One wanting to get something in the Charter and one saying it is totally illegal. We now have a ruling from the judge and the ruling basically came out and said that the language as it is drafted violates state law in that it is inconsistent with the land uses and the Comp Plan of the County and the City. The judge also declared it was illegal because it violated a particular Florida Statute that says you can't use these types of measures to effect five or fewer parcels of land. The judge was very concerned about the fact that there may be an appeal and so directed that the measure and ordered the City to place the measure on the ballot anyway. While he ruled it is illegal he also ruled that it be placed on the ballot. The resolution before Council is carrying out the wishes of the court and doing exactly that. This train is being driven by interested landowners whose property is being affected by the measure as well as the citizens that have gone through the effort of getting the petitions signed to get the measure on the ballot. The City will continue to be part of the process. There has been some communication as to whether or not there will be an appeal although none has been filed yet. There is a hearing tomorrow on a motion related to whether or not the order that came out is actually final and can be appealed. She thought that was the judge's intention but he failed to directly address a couple of the issues that were raised and there is case law that suggested maybe it wasn't final and appealable. To resolve that, one of the interested landowners has brought a motion before Judge Rouse to get a ruling on that. She presumed there would be an appeal. In the meantime the City should comply with the courts order and place the measure on the ballot. That is what the resolution before them does. Page 39 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 Councilman Cooper stated he tells them it is illegal and then he tells them to put it on anyway. It doesn't make sense the judge would be so gray. Let's break the law and what would be the ramification of the City if it now deems illegal so we get sued again. Would we be held in contempt of court if they didn't put it on? Councilwoman Bennington stated she asked the same thing. City Attorney Ansay stated the short answer is certainly any time you disregard a courts order there could possibly be sanctions and ramifications to that. She would not encourage them to do that. She concurred it was highly unusual and they have been unable to find any precedence for a case where a court has ruled an action is illegal but told a party to do it anyway. In fairness to Judge Rouse, she clearly understood what he was trying to do. In every other ballot case when a judge rules it is illegal the judge says don't put it on the ballot but here given the tight time frames she thought his goal was let them appeal the underlying decision on the merits, i.e. that it is illegal and if they are successful and the appellate court agrees with them and overturns his decision that they still have that ability to continue forward and not be put back two years. The reaction she has gotten from everyone on the Council and staff is one of confusion because it is a highly unprecedented thing for a judge to make a ruling that something is illegal but says do it anyway in the short term and let's see what works out. We are ordered to place it on the ballot irrespective of the fact that the law as it exists now in this final judgment is that the measure is illegal. We still must do it and she recommended they do that. Councilwoman Rhodes stated it isn't illegal for it to be on the ballot. It is illegal if it passes. City Attorney Ansay stated as a general proposition in any other case where the law provides that when a ballot measure is contrary to state law it is not to be placed on the ballot. What often happens is it is placed on the ballot first and then the lawsuit proceeds to determine whether it is legal so it was already on the ballot to begin with before the decision of illegality comes out. That is where they find most of the cases. Here we were ahead of the curve. You don't find that scenario very often. Councilman Cooper stated they tried to get a ruling so they did the right thing and he bypassed everything they tried to do and didn't give them a ruling. Councilwoman Rhodes stated he gave us a ruling and said put it on the ballot. Page 40 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 Our question was do we put this on the ballot and he gave them that answer. Councilwoman Bennington stated he also gave them something Mr. Henderson taught her when he was the City Attorney here and she said Clay why can't they write these ordinances so people can really understand them. He said how do you think the attorney's make their living? Now we have a judge that we have to go and interpret his ruling. Councilman Cooper commented on the confusion he believes this is going to create for the citizens. He questioned how they fix this? Councilwoman Rhodes stated the judge said in his order that he trusted the citizens of the City were of average intelligence and could understand it. City Attorney Ansay stated originally there were five legal issues that were thrown out to the City and the City said to the judge these are the five challenges that have been raised with us. One of them was is this measure confusing, is it ambiguous. The judge ruled on that particular ground that he didn't feel it was ambiguous. He didn't' find it illegal on that particular ground but he did on the other two. They had a very long hearing before Judge Rouse where ECARD's lawyer presented a very compelling case for ECARD and attorneys representing four of land owners, with the Snowden's talking for themselves, the ruling came after a pretty spirited debate on the issue. After hearing both sides the judge was compelled by some of the arguments on both but he did ultimately conclude it was illegal on at least two of the grounds." Mayor Thomas opened the public hearing. The following citizens spoke: Carol Ann Stoughton, 2740 Evergreen Drive, stated Kelly Cuculianski of the News Journal wrote a very good article and this is not ambiguous. It says a proposed City Charter amendment may violate State law but a judge ruled that voters should be allowed to have their say on the controversial measure in November. She thanked Kelly. City Attorney Ansay explained that the order is very clear. There is a part that says it is ordered and adjudged that the article was a little bit inaccurate in that it used the word may. The court concluded it is. If an Appellate Page 41 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 Court overrules that the answer would change. As they sit here today the judge has ruled in that regard. Ted Brown, Baker & Hostetler, for the Restoration project, stated it his considerate opinion that they have no choice but to put this matter on the ballot. They have a court order in front of them that compels that. To say he understands what the judge has done would be misleading them greatly. As the City's counsel has advised them this is unprecedented in terms of their own research on this matter. Until someone reverses that decision through the appellate process or the judge himself reverses it on his own initiative, they must go forward. Whether or not this passes and forgetting the legal implications of the other part of the court's order depends to a large extent on what the City does as reps of this community. Whether they get out and convince people that the right way to run a City is to entrust the power to their elected representatives, it doesn't forestall the right of petition initiative but you cannot run a City through the constant purview of petition initiatives. He is hopeful. One of the reasons they are going to participate actively as a developer in this community is because they own a lot of land, they have a lot of money invested in Edgewater, they don't think this is the way to run the railroad and they are hopeful that the weight of what this means that the citizens of this community once told and can understand they have great faith that they will understand that it is important to the long term future of the City of Edgewater that the Council and their successors have the unencumbered authority to make decisions about what it is this City is going to do and what is in it's best interest. They stand ready to be shoulder to shoulder with the Council and other citizens who want to see this matter on the ballot and hopefully when it is on the ballot they can clear the issue at all time and these legal arguments will not need to be dealt with from this point forward. They look forward to working with the City. They are hopeful the combination of all of that will enable them to claim victory in November and move forward. Councilman Cooper stated there may be an appeal and depending on how fast that comes into fruition if the appeal overrules this ruling and they have it on the ballot now what would happen? City Attorney Ansay explained if there were an appeal and the appeal were resolved prior to November 4th finding that the measure is indeed valid and Page 42 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 legal, not illegal, reversing Judge Rouse, then it is on the ballot anyway and the voters get to vote on it and whatever happens in terms of the election would be instituted into the Charter. If it passes, you put it in the Charter. If it doesn't, you don't. There are a number of procedural steps that would need to take place. If the court were to affirm the decision and basically say they thought Judge Rouse made the right decision, that this is illegal, the court would also likely deal with the issue of the fact that it is on the ballot. They would likely rule the election is moot or not to be considered. The way that works in the election process is they have up until election day to instruct the Supervisor of Elections to count or not count certain measures that are on the ballot. If a court were to say it was illegal and it didn't count, they would tell Ann McFall not to go through the process of counting all of these votes. It now has become moot by a court order and therefore it is ineffectual. Ann McFall has informed her that could be done as of November 4th. That would only be if the court were to make that decision. Mr. Brown agreed with City Attorney Ansay's explanation. City Attorney Ansay explained up until such time as a court says it shouldn't be counted the process has to go forward. It has to be put on the ballot and it has to be counted. Admittedly this really is a new area of law. She has had very good conversations with counsel for ECARD about the law and the issues. She thinks they are correct in that there is not a whole lot of authority and it is very likely that the City of Edgewater may be one of the test cases in this area of the law. Councilman Cooper asked if it was likely that an appeal can be judged upon that quick in this short period of time. City Attorney Ansay stated in election cases the court has the amazing ability to rule really quickly on these types of issues. They generally make every effort to do so understanding there are certain time frames. Here it is on the ballot already. She suspects if either of the two parties are interested in seeing a resolution quickly before the election that they will get one. Clay Henderson, Riverside Drive, New Smyrna Beach, representing Mercedes, the Reflections project that is also affected by this, stated he has never quite seen anything like this. He agreed they have no choice but to move it forward to the ballot. He commented on a situation in the Page 43 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 County back in 2004 where an initiative was placed on the ballot to amend the County Charter and the 5th District Court of Appeals stepped in with about two weeks to go before the election and declared it to be invalid. It did not count and that could be the case here. The Reflection situation is a little different. They still have an active counter claim against the City on the basis of protecting their rights. They have their land use amendment. It was given to Council and DCA approved it. They have the rezoning. The Council granted that order. They even have a conceptual permit from St. Johns. To come in and be able to do this by Charter, if they can do this, this turns everything that all of them know about growth management and permitting on its ear. They look at they will take the order on its face value. They believe it is illegal and will continue to process their paperwork with the City and they have every confidence the City will continue to receive it, and review it and process it in the order because they are entitled to those rights that have been given to them by this Council and approved by the other parties. They will be there with them but they are in a little different situation and will continue to move forward to protect their rights in the matter. He commended the Council for bringing the declaratory action and asking the judge for his advice. He thinks that was prudent and he complimented the City Attorney for doing it. Bob Lott, 2112 S. Riverside Drive, stated they have three counsel who have suggested that although it is illegal on two counts they have no choice because they are officers of the court to. advise the City to abide by the court's decision. Mr. Lott asked City Attorney Ansay what the sanctions and consequences she referred to were? City Attorney Ansay stated judges have the power to issue sanctions, contempt orders. It could be monetary sanctions. She felt jail time would be highly unlikely. Typically contempt when it comes to a final judgment usually involves a particular person. She didn't think they would throw all five of the Council in jail. She would not encourage the City to do anything in the court's eyes that would be viewed as contempt. We are in the process of litigating with this very judge a vested rights determination where they have said a developer is not vested and the developer is appealing and they are going to be back before Judge Rouse in a couple of weeks to argue our case. She doesn't want Page 44 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 to have to go in there and try to plead her case to the judge when at the same time he lS asking her why her client disobeyed his order. Mr. Lott stated they are going to do what they are going to do but he would do it under severe protest. He thinks that having the court system make laws, he thought it was up the laws to interpret and enforce laws. This to him doesn't fall under that category. They aren't enforcing the law. Councilman Cooper asked if they could do it under protest? Councilwoman Bennington stated what difference does that make? Councilman Cooper stated because you go on record as saying you really want to put something on that you were already told" is illegal. City Attorney Ansay stated her legal opinion would be that doing it under protest may make them feel better but she didn't think it would have any legal effect. The fact of the matter is it will still go on the ballot. The Council's direction to her and she does understand if it is they are doing it because they are being ordered to do it, if there ultimately is an appeal and the is of whether or not this whole thing was proper to require them to place it on the ballot when it was deemed illegal she can make sure that any Appellate Court knows their distaste for that. Beyond that they still have to do what they are ordered to do. Bill Glaser, 1703 Needle Palm Drive, asked if any of the Council had ever perused the Florida Statutes. Mayor Thomas stated he has enforced them. Mr. Glaser asked about Title 12 - Municipalities, Chapter 171 - local government boundaries. It has to do with annexation procedures. Number two says following final adoption of the ordinance of annexation by the governing body of the annexing municipality, the ordinance shall be submitted to a vote of the registered voters of the area proposed to be annexed. There is another jewel on here. The governing body of the annexing municipality may also chose to submit the ordinance of annexation to a separate vote of the registered voters of the annexing municipality. He found that kind of interesting. He went out and searched. He never found one city in the State of Florida that ever allowed the voters to vote on whether they wanted property annexed into the City. They have that opportunity to give that choice to the voters when they are annexing large tracts of property into the City and there they would have their answer. How many people wanted it and how many Page 45 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 didn't want it and they wouldn't have all this petition business. Pat Card, 3019 Willow Oak Drive, stated he looks at this a little bit differently. He thinks this judge has put them in a commendable position. They have the opportunity to ignore one person or all of the Legislature of the State of Florida. Mayor Thomas asked Ted Brown if a judge ordered them to do something if he would do it. Mr. Brown responded by saying yes. Mayor Thomas then asked Clay Henderson if a judge ordered him to do something if he would do it. Mr. Henderson informed him he was in a special situation. Unlike anybody else in this room, he can be held in contempt of household. Councilwoman Rhodes asked him if that was a yes. Mr. Henderson informed her he does what he is told. Mayor Thomas closed the public hearing and entertained a motion. Councilwoman. Rhodes moved to approve Res. 2008-R-10, authorizing and directing that the Charter amendment related to density west of I-95 proposed by Edgewater Citizens' Alliance for Responsible Development, Inc. be submitted to the electors of the City of Edgewater at the November 4, 2008 General Election, second by Councilman Cooper. The MOTION CARRIED 5 - 0 . 8. BOARD APPOINTMENTS A. Economic Development Board - Councilwoman Rogers appointments to fill the expired term of Eric Caplan, who seeks reappointment (Continued from the July 28, 2008 meeting) Councilwoman Rogers moved to reappoint Eric Caplan to the Economic Development Board, second by Councilwoman Rhodes. The MOTION CARRIED 5 - 0 . B. Firefighters Pension Board - Councilwoman Rogers appointment to fill the expired term of Gary Butt who seeks reappointment and has been re-elected Page 46 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 by the other Board Members (Continued from the July 28, 2008 meeting) Councilwoman Rogers moved to reappoint Gary Butt to the Firefighters Pension Board, second by Councilwoman Rhodes. The MOTION CARRIED 5-0. C. Firefighters Pension Board - Councilwoman Bennington's appointment to fill the expired term of Martin Tse, the Board recommends appointing Deborah Harrison (Continued from the July 28, 2008 meeting) Councilwoman Bennington moved to appoint Deborah Harrison to the Firefighters Pension Board, second by Councilwoman Rogers. The MOTION CARRIED 5 - 0 . 9. OTHER BUSINESS A. City Clerk's release from probation and annual compensation of $50,000 effective August II, 2008 Councilwoman Rogers moved to release the City Clerk from probation and that they allow her to have an annual compensation of $50,000 effective August 11, 2008, second by Councilwoman Rhodes. The MOTION CARRIED 5 - 0 . B. Approval of a one year extension with McDirmit, Davis & Company, LLC and authorization for the Acting City Manager to execute the engagement letter and conduct the request for proposal beginning with fiscal year ending September 30, 2009 Acting City Manager Barlow made a staff presentation. Councilwoman Rogers asked when they would start the other process to retain someone else. Acting City Manager Barlow suggested probably January. Finance Director McKinney stated he went through this whole thing last year and it took them six months from start to finish. Page 47 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 Councilwoman Bennington questioned the money coming out of the General Fund and if they were going to prorate the Enterprise Fund for their share. Finance Director McKinney informed her it is taken care of in the cost allocation. McDirmit, Davis even though there was up to three one-year renewals they have only committed for one more renewal. He thinks they are ready for a change. Councilwoman Rhodes always thought it was good to switch auditing companies. Finance Director McKinney informed her they are required to now by the Auditor General. Due to there being no comments, Mayor Thomas entertained a motion. Councilwoman Bennington made a motion to approve the one year extension with McDirmit Davis & Company and to authorize the Acting City Manager to execute the engagement letter and conduct the request for proposal beginning with fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, second by Councilwoman Rogers. The MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 10. OFFICER REPORTS A. City Clerk City Clerk Wenzel thanked the Council and stated she would do her best not to let them down. B. City Attorney City Attorney Ansay had nothing at this time. C. City Manager Acting City Manager Barlow reminded the Council of the workshop on August 23rd in the Community Center for the Envision Edgewater process. City Clerk Wenzel will be coordinating refreshments as well. Acting City Manager Barlow reminded them of the Enterprise Fund workshop on August 25th at 6 p.m. in the community Center. Acting City Manager Barlow informed Mayor Thomas provided the WAV meeting continues on Wednesday that Brenda Dewees Page 48 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 would also be attending. One of the discussions is the Health Department is requesting that the cities add an assessment to their water bills, which they claim offsets the cost to continue with the Safe Drinking Water Act. It's a $.95 per every single residential connection, once a year and $15 for all others. The language in the request is quite confusing and not very descriptive. They have concerns if they are mandated or required to utilize the services of the Volusia County Health Department verses going back to FDEP for their services. There is a lot to be flushed out of this request. They are digging into it. They aren't sure how far the initiative has gone. City Attorney Ansay stated the only thing she knows is the Executive Director has been asked to get support at the WAV Board. She thought her recommendation was going to be to do it. That is based on information conversations where she thought it was a good idea. It's on their agenda for Wednesday. Acting City Manager Barlow presented an update on Tropical Storm Fay. Councilwoman Rhodes asked if all staff would be there tomorrow. Acting City Manager Barlow confirmed all staff would be here and that they weren't planning on closing any government offices in Edgewater. Councilwoman Rhodes asked about trash collection tomorrow. Acting City Manager Barlow informed her they would probably have it picked up before the storm. Councilwoman Rhodes asked if recycling would be the same. Acting City Manager Barlow confirmed recycling would be the same. Acting City Manager Barlow stated they would open up a citizen info~mation center so they can call and talk to a real live body with real information. They have already stacked sand piles at Rotary Park, Whistle Stop Park and at Fire Station 57. Bring your own bags and bring your own shovels. He would be monitoring the flooding issues throughout the City. He further commented on the City departments being prepared. He then reported that Volusia County had announced they were closing the schools on Tuesday and Wednesday and they have opened up two shelters. He didn't anticipate any significant issues with this storm. Page 49 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008 Mayor Thomas stated he would be coming down here after his dentist appointment and getting in the field with somebody. He asked Acting City Manager Barlow to line it up. 1) Tentative Agenda Items There were no Tentative Agenda Items to be discussed at this time. 11. CITIZEN COMMENTS There were no Citizen Comments at this time. 12 . ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to discuss, the meeting adjourned at 11:00 p.m. Minutes submitted by: Lisa Bloomer Page 50 of 50 Council Regular Meeting August 18, 2008