06-16-2008 - Regular
CITY COUNCIL OF EDGEWATER
REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 16, 2008
7:00 P.M.
COMMUNITY CENTER
MINUTES
MINUTES FOR ITEMS 1 - 7B WERE DONE BASED ON NOTES TAKEN
DURING THE MEETING DUE TO THE FIRST HOUR OF THE MEETING NOT
RECORDING.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Thomas called the Regular Meeting to order at 7:00
p.m. in the Community Center.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Michael Thomas
Councilwoman Debra Rogers
Councilwoman Gigi Bennington
Councilwoman Harriet Rhodes
Councilman Ted Cooper
Acting City Manager Tracey Barlow
Assistant City Attorney Michael Ciocchetti
City Clerk Bonnie Wenzel
INVOCATION, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
There was a silent invocation and pledge of allegiance to
the Flag.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular Meeting of February 4, 2008
Councilman Cooper moved to approve the February 4, 2008
minutes, second by Councilwoman Rhodes.
The MOTION CARRIED 5 - 0 .
B. Regular Meeting of March 3, 2008
Councilman Cooper moved to approve the March 3, 2008
minutes, second by Councilwoman Rhodes.
Page 1 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
The MOTION CARRIED 5 - 0 .
C. Regular Meeting of March 17, 2008
Councilman Cooper moved to approve the March 17, 2008
minutes, second by Councilwoman Rhodes.
The MOTION CARRIED 5 - 0 .
D. Regular Meeting of May 5, 2008
Councilman Cooper moved to approve the May 5, 2008 minutes,
second by Councilwoman Rhodes.
The MOTION CARRIED 5 - 0 .
3. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/PLAQUES/CERTIFICATES/DON
ATIONS
There were no Presentations at this time.
4. CITIZEN COMMENTS
The following citizens spoke:
Dominic Capria, 606 Topside Circle, stated two meetings ago
he asked about sick/vacation savings. He asked what the
savings was. Does it involve Police, Fire & General?
Acting City Manager Barlow informed him $4,023.42 was saved
this year. He added that 100% of the employees had a
reduction.
Dot Carlson, 624 Art Center, asked if the Charter Review
Committee had any plans to bring up the height amendment in
the next 20 years. Councilwoman Rhodes stated that would
be discussed tonight.
Carol Stoughton, 2740 Evergreen Drive, asked Council if
they read the papers about the water shortage. Volusia
County will be out of water in 7 years. The City wants to
bring in 9,800 homes. Two people on City Council were
financed by developers and she hopes they don't vote on
development we don't need. She stated people come to her
disgusted. The Mayor ran on "keep green". Volusia County
is in debt $20 million. The City Council should move and
advertise for energy companies to come in and establish
water safe efficiencies. Who are the wells for, existing
Page 2 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
residents or developers? She wanted to know what was spent
this year on the attorney compared to the old one. She
wants a call with that answer.
Bob Lester, 2230 Needle Palm Drive, stated he has an
article that says the Charter Review Committee says to
revote on the height limit. He wanted to know why they
should revote. He stated that someone has something to
gain. He stated and elections another 13 months, why 13
months. Why should we have to put up with you?
Councilwoman Rhodes stated to save the City money. Mr.
Lester stated they should not take the pay. Councilwoman
Rhodes stated she was not doing it for free. Councilman
Cooper stated these were two agenda items to discuss
tonight. Mr. Lester stated they would pass them.
5. CITY COUNCIL REPOPRTS
Councilwoman Rhodes responded to Mr. Lester by stating the
fact is she goes to these meetings and does her job. She
stated it costs gas money. If anyone else wants to do
this go ahead. Mr. Lester stated he would do it.
Councilwoman Rhodes stated then get elected. She added
that she does worry about money. Who doesn't? If she
could she would be happy to let people call her names for
free.
Councilman Cooper read his report into the record.
(Attached)
Mayor Thomas stated based on performance level Acting City
Manager Barlow has done great. He commended Steve Cousins
on the 4th of July event. He stated the event was still on
mostly because of three boat manufacturers. He further
explained the day's events and organization of the event.
Councilwoman Bennington stated she was glad the Association
took the initiative to ask for donations. She was glad to
see this get back to what it was and that it would not cost
the taxpayers a dime.
Councilwoman Rogers stated she has received numerous phone
calls from Cherrywood. She stated most of the issues have
been addressed, but 211 Cherrywood is consistently a
problem. She gets calls for non-maintenance and would like
to see this looked at. She also stated the yard waste
trucks are not picking up debris. She asked who cleans up
Page 3 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
when an owner does his own roof. Acting City Manager
Barlow stated that the owner/contractor is responsible. He
further stated that Code would give about 10 days to
resolve the issue.
Councilwoman Rogers stated she has received e-mails on the
height amendment. She stated that 35 feet is not going to
make or break the City right now. Some projects already
exceed the 35-foot height limit. Economics have nothing to
do with 35 feet. She stated the City should look at what
will attract business. She asked that Restoration bring
businesses first then homes. She stated that the people to
the south would come to shop.
Councilwoman Bennington stated the shelter is on schedule
and the building should be up during the second week of
July. She stated the renovation plans are almost complete.
Councilwoman Bennington stated the employee lunch was
great, but wondered what is Chinese Grouper? She stated it
was really good.
Councilwoman Bennington said included in the last budget
the City was able to participate in the League of Cities
conference. This is a very good conference to go to. She
stated she has talked to Acting City Manager Barlow &
Finance Director McKinney and money is available if anyone
wants to go. It is $871 per person total. She stated they
set Legislature there. Councilwoman Rhodes stated she was
interested and that the conference is very beneficial.
Councilwoman Bennington stated Acting City Manager Barlow
has been in that position since December. He declined a
raise at that point. Every position has gotten a raise.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked if he asked for out of class pay.
Councilwoman Bennington stated she would like to ask City
Council to give him a 10% raise. They are now paid up with
Jon Williams. She does not want to lose him. Acting City
Manager Barlow asked them to consider amending it to 2-5%,
although he appreciated the gesture. Councilwoman
Bennington stated the prior City Manager received travel
expenses. Acting City Manager Barlow pays his own. He is
one of the best City Managers we have had. Mayor Thomas
asked if this would affect his pension. Acting City
Manager Barlow stated no. Councilwoman Rhodes asked if he
received a clothing allowance. Councilwoman Bennington
stated he gets nothing.
Page 4 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
Councilwoman Bennington moved to give Acting City Manager
Barlow a 5% raise with allowance, expenses up to $500 a
month retroactive.
Motion DIED due to the lack of a second.
Councilman Cooper asked Acting City Manager Barlow to give
them an idea as to what would be compatible.
Councilwoman Bennington moved to give Acting City Manager
Barlow a 7 %% raise with no allowance and not retroactive,
second by Councilman Cooper.
The MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
6. CONSENT AGENDA
There were no items on the Consent Agenda to be discussed
at this time.
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution No. 2008-R-07, supporting the FDOT in
the development and implementation of the Central
Florida Commuter Rail Project
Assistant City Attorney Ciocchetti read Res. 2008-R-07 into
the record.
Acting City Manager Barlow made a staff presentation.
Councilwoman Bennington asked how this would benefit us
directly. Acting City Manager Barlow stated this is a
request of the MPO. The intent is to help alleviate
traffic in Central Florida on 1-4. It could benefit our
residents if they go that way. Councilwoman Bennington
stated the MPO asked them to support this. Councilman
Cooper stated there was one more year to get approval by
the State. This was a consolidated effort by the County.
At some point we will be asked for money. This is a plan
for the future. Councilwoman Bennington stated in the long
run it will cost us.
Mayor Thomas opened the public hearing.
Page 5 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
Dave Ross, 2803 Needle Palm Drive, stated he was not
educated in the pros and cons they see on this. He is
concerned the MPO put this out for political reasons. The
City could become a political pawn. Do you know DOT is
right and the opposition is wrong? This will cost us. The
State will pay millions.
Councilwoman Rhodes stated there are valid questions that
need to be answered. Councilman Cooper stated they argued
this at each MPO meeting. Million of dollars will benefit
Port Orange, Daytona Beach, and Ormond Beach. This is
political football. Councilwoman Rhodes suggested holding
this for more information. Councilwoman Bennington asked
from whom the MPO? Councilman Cooper stated they are only
asking for support. Councilwoman Rhodes stated she wanted
to know about the money. Councilwoman Rogers stated they
are not being asked to commit money. Acting City Manager
Barlow stated he and Councilman Cooper wopld get more
information and bring this back later.
Mayor Thomas closed the public hearing.
Councilwoman Rogers move to approve Res. 2008-R-07.
DIED due to lack of a second.
Councilwoman Rhodes moved to table Res. 2008-R-07 until
they could get more information, second by Councilwoman
Bennington.
The MOTION CARRIED 4 -1 .
Councilwoman Roqers voted NO.
Dave Ross was in agreement as to who this is most
beneficial to. Acting City Manager Barlow asked who
assumes the liability. Councilman Cooper stated it would
be subsidized by all of us. Councilwoman Rogers stated the
City would not benefit directly. It would be a long time
before money was needed. They are only asking the cities
to say they are for it, not promising money.
B. Ordinance No. 2008-0-06, amending the Firemen's
Pension Fund to include the share plan to the
existing plan
Assistant City Attorney Ciocchetti read Ord. 2008-0-06 into
the record.
Page 6 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
Acting City Manager Barlow made a staff presentation.
Jim Jollie stated they received State money from Community
Development and it is divvied out by the State. There are
very specific ways to use the money. They held off making
any changes to find a plan that costs the City no money.
Councilman Cooper stated so there is no impact. You can't
buy a fire truck with this money? Mr. Jollie stated it is
very specific on what it can be spent on. If you don't use
it you can't hold it for the future. There is at least a
5-year vesting period. Acting City Manager Barlow stated
it is intended to help offset healthcare. Mr. Jollie
stated the State says they need to use it. Acting City
Manager Barlow stated it could only be used for pension
enhancements. The City does not contribute to
enhancements.
Councilman Cooper moved to approve Ord. 2008-0-06, amending
the Firemen's Pension Fund to include the share plan to the
existing plan, second by Councilwoman Rhodes.
The MOTION CARRIED 5 - 0 .
Mayor Thomas called for a ten-minute recess at this time.
The meeting recessed at 8:02 p.m. and reconvened at 8:15
p.m.
C. Ordinance No. 2008-0-07, providing for an
amendment of the City Charter, Section 3.04
"Election and Terms"
Assistant City Attorney Ciocchetti read Ord. 2008-0-07 into
the record.
Acting City Manager Barlow made a staff presentation.
Ferd Heeb, 115 N. Riverside Drive, asked how he could help
the Council.
Mayor Thomas asked him to tell them why the Charter Review
committee came up with this suggestion.
Mr. Heeb stated they have to understand that State law
changed. They made some amendments to the State election
law requiring audits, a percentage of the precincts and
elections. The largest part of it started with the
Supervisor of Elections. She said we have 17 cities and
Page 7 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
most of these cities are on odd numbered years. They have
to run these 17 elections on the odd numbered years and
each of them is a separate election so now they have to
audit one precinct in each of the 17 cities. This is
expensive. Somebody has to pay for this. Presently while
we are on an odd numbered years we have to pay for the
elections costs, $16,000, which is projected to grow as our
population grows. This cost will expand every year from
here on out. They studied it and studied the State law.
They had Ann McFall come in and address them. They talked
to attorneys and went through the issues. They decided as
a Committee that the solution to this was to adopt the
State law as it is applicable to Volusia County which would
put this City and al of the cities on even numbered years.
The problem. If they are going to change from odd years to
even years how do they go about it? They kicked this
around and came up with the only solution is that they are
going to have to extend the Council's term for twelve
months. Under our present Charter the Council takes office
the first Tuesday in November after the election. They
talked to Susan Wadsworth and she has had to deal with
these elections for thirty years and they found this is a
problem because if there is ever a situation where they
have to do a recount they could possibly have three vacant
spots when they reconvene the Council. They discussed it
and decided they should extend that one-month so that now
the elected officials will take office on the first Tuesday
in December after the lection. From there by unanimous
vote the committee recommended this ordinance to the City
Council to go on the ballot.
Mr. Heeb then addressed a couple of arguments. The first
argument that comes out constantly is we elected you for
four years, why are you still there. The answer is if you
are really that dead set against these people continuing
for thirteen months then vote against the amendment, we'll
stay at odd numbered years, we'll continue to pay the cost
of elections until such time as we get a group of people
that understand why they were trying to go to even numbered
years.
Mayor Thomas stated from what he understood they had
another option. Some of the cities have adopted
resolutions where the City Council said that they were
going to adopt this. They didn't take that option. They
said no that they wanted to go to the voters and let the
voters decide.
Page 8 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
Mr. Heeb stated this Council could adopt this ordinance and
change the election from even to odd numbered years. They
felt under the circumstances it would be better for this
City to put it on the ballot and let the citizens address
the issue.
Mr. Ross asked if it was a Charter issue.
informed him it was a valid Charter issue.
how the Council could change the Charter.
Mr. Heeb
Mr. Ross asked
Assistant City Attorney Ciocchetti stated if they review
Florida Statute 166.031.1 there is a limited exception in
there where Council may extend their terms to transition in
election years. It is a right within a Council.
Mr. Ross asked if they could move it from odd to even
numbered years. Assistant City Attorney Ciocchetti stated
that is the purpose attending to that would be extending
their terms.
Councilman Cooper commented on the three seats coming up
for election. There is no way to correct this problem
unless they blanketly do it. Their hands were tied when
they went into this. The State and Supervisor of Elections
is mandating it to you and are saying to the citizens they
can vote it in or vote it out. If they vote it out
understand it could cost anywhere from $16,000 to $22,000
for every election.
Mr. Heeb stated one of the issues they discussed was what
about the people who were elected for four year terms and
are on their second term. He used Councilwoman Rhodes as
an example. Does she really want to serve another year?
They address this and made a provision in this Charter
amendment that would allow her to resign and the Charter
will provide that in this one instance the Council can
appoint her successor for that thirteen-month period. They
covered that point to because that is always an issue.
Councilwoman Bennington asked if the Committee considered
the voter turnout as an issue in the decision when they
were doing the recommendation to go from even numbered
years? Our voter turnout in the odd numbered years is
atrocious for this City. Mr. Heeb informed her they did.
He mentioned there being a number of articles in the
newspaper and there was one of the people that had a column
Page 9 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
that discussed that issue and he was upset because he felt
that in an odd numbered year that the "super voters" had
more of a voice in what happened in the municipalities than
they did in even numbered years because of the turnout.
Normally you have a light turnout in odd numbered years and
a heavy turnout in any of the State or National elections.
From his position, he thinks that is advantageous to have a
better turnout and to have more of the people voices heard
on issues than a low turnout. In a local election a lot of
times people don't pay attention to the issues and don't
research the issues before they vote or consider the
implications or problems that may be created by what they
are voting on. A lot of time they donlt understand what it
says so they donlt vote.
Councilwoman Bennington stated if they are going to waste
their vote, the local vote is the worst place not to vote.
That is where they have the biggest vote. Your vote makes
a difference there more than any other place. It is a
privilege to vote. We have men dying for this privilege.
The voter turn out they have had in the last two elections
is horrendous. She is ashamed of Edgewaterl the electors
for the low turnout.
Mr. Heeb felt if she looked at the vote and turnout at the
elections on the odd numbered years, that 85% of the people
that voted in the last municipal election voted in the one
before that and the one before that. Sometimes they can
get an emotional reaction to an issue and that 85% of the
people can become emotional about that issue and vote
something that they never would have voted if they really
thought about it. He feels if they can get a better
turnout I get more citizens involved they will have a better
City and less suspicion and worry about how things are
being operated in the City.
Councilwoman Rhodes stated she appreciated the clause that
she can resign if she wants to. Her intention is not to do
that. She takes this job seriously and she gives it
everything she has 95% of the time. With health issues
that are going on with her with dad and stuff like that it
might be necessary. She appreciated all of the work the
Charter Review Committee did. They did it quickly and they
did a great job.
Mayor Thomas opened the public hearing.
Page 10 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
The following citizens spoke:
Mike Visconti, 316 Pine Breeze Drive, stated the Charter
Review Committee deserved a round of applause for the job
they have done. This is only going to happen for the first
time. Once it is done it will go smoothly. He thinks that
everybody who votes for the council, they voted because
they trusted them, put them in office and he praised the
City Council and the Mayor and the City Manager for the job
they have been doing for the City of Edgewater. We have
people that come and complain and it is always a negative
part they complain about, never the positive part. This is
one of the positive times they should say yes. He felt
council should do this because it will help Edgewater
financially and more voters will turn out on the even
numbered years because everybody votes at the same time for
different issues.
Councilwoman Rhodes stated they would never have that whole
General Election/Municipal Election debate ever again.
Dominic Capri a , 606 Topside Circle, stated he is for even
years. He feels there is a better way to do it. He knows
they worked hard and he knows they have a clause in there
if you resign but he thinks he has an answer for that. He
believes that he has been told that it is unconstitutional
to change the term of the four years. He asked the
Attorney if that was true. He then asked if it is
unconstitutional why would it not be unconstitutional to
lower the term. He suggested for the even years even
though there is a clause in there if you resign that the
Council appoints. He is not for that at all. He knows all
of the Council are working for the City and they believe in
the City. Now is the time to prove it. What they can do
to help the situation is submit a letter of resignation at
the end of the third year. Therefore they will have no
election in 2008 when there is a Presidential Election
where a lot of votes will be coming out and if you are
liked you will be elected again.
Mr. Capria still wanted the answer on the constitutionality
of raising it or lowering it and is it legal to do what he
just asked.
Mayor Thomas asked Assistant City Attorney Ciocchetti if he
wanted to answer that.
Page 11 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
Assistant City Attorney Ciocchetti stated he answers
questions if he is directed by Council to answer questions.
He would not submit an ordinance to Council that was
unconstitutional. He has already stated their position and
the position of many other municipal attorneys in the
State. Pursuant to Florida Statute 166.031.1 this Council
has the authority to adopt an ordinance changing their
terms and extending them for a period of one year without a
referendum. It is constitutional via referendum or
ordinance. If they have a basis please provide that other
than just a generalization that it is unconstitutional.
Mr. Capria stated that they have the right to change to the
lesser year.
Assistant City Attorney Ciocchetti stated he wasn't trying
to engage them in every type of factual scenario. Question
#1 yes it is constitutional. If you have a basis please
provide it. Question #2. They did examine shortening
limits. The Attorney General has spoken to extending
limits and they are basing this on precedent not only
within Florida Statues but interpretation by the Attorney
General, which is not binding precedent but their advisory
opinion. We are basing this on the Attorney General and
what other municipalities have done.
Mr. Capria stated he hoped they would give his
recommendation some consideration. It will be faster.
They will get more votes out because of the Presidential
Election and nobody will be hurt.
Councilwoman Rhodes disagreed. If three of them resign,
the three that are up for re-election in 2009, to eliminate
that 2009 election before the 2008 election and ran again,
if they resigned, then they would have three vacant seats
on the Council. They would have to resign before because
you can't sit on the Council if you resign. You have three
vacant seats. Assistant City Attorney Ciocchetti stated
these are the type of questions he doesn't like analyzing
in a public meeting. Councilwoman Rhodes stated three of
them resign and they have three vacant seats. As soon as
they resign they didn't complete their term so then she
could run for two more terms. Councilwoman Bennington
stated they wouldn't have a majority and couldn't conduct
any City business.
Mr. Moriarty stated there is a point to that. If all three
resign the Legislature has designated the Governor as the
Page 12 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
appointee of the selection so they would have a majority.
The Governor would appoint one so they would have a
majority.
Assistant City Attorney Ciocchetti stated there are
emergency procedures. Councilwoman Rhodes feels that is a
logistical nightmare there.
Carol Stoughton, 2740 Evergreen Drive, stated she voted for
certain candidates for four years. She feels her
constitutional rights have been met when they got elected.
She only wanted them in office for four years. She doesn't
see any constitutional basis that allows the Council to
take a stand whether it is their position. This is a
position. This is not law. Neither is the Attorney
General law. She feels they are treading on waters here
just because Ann McFall feels it saves them $16,000. She
feels she has that right every four years to vote whether
it is an odd year or an even year. She hopes the ones that
are up for office, a certain two, don't have another year.
That would be like putting Bush back in for another year.
Forget it. Perhaps there is a reason for this because
certain people that are up there are all for the developers
and she thinks that is why they would like them to stay.
Councilman Cooper thought what was being missed from
Council is the fact that Mr. Heeb has brought up. They are
bringing it back to the voters to vote. They could make
the resolution and go along with Ann McFall's
recommendation. They don't want to usurp their vote. They
are putting it back to the voters and they have the right
to say no, keep it the way it is or they vote it in and
they go along with the even numbered years. Nobody was
trying to usurp a vote. He is against taking that vote
away. They are getting the opportunity to vote again on
it. They are basically voting the five of them in for one
more year should they vote for this change. Should you
not, it stays right where it is and the City will be
expensed what it costs to run those elections.
Bob Lester, Needle Palm Drive, stated that wasn't the deal
when they voted. The deal was for four years.
Councilwoman Bennington stated things change. Mr. Lester
stated so do wars. Councilwoman Bennington stated
circumstances change. Mr. Lester stated you get an extra
year. He didn't vote for Councilwoman Bennington anyway.
Councilwoman Bennington stated she didn't ask for it. Like
Page 13 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
Mr. Cooper said if you don't want it you vote no. Mr.
Lester stated why should they have to go vote on an issue
that has been settled for years. Councilwoman Bennington
informed him he doesn't have to. Mr. Lester asked why
should they give them an extra year and tell them they have
to go vote to make sure they don't get an extra year.
Councilwoman Bennington informed him he didn't have to vote
if he didn't want to. Mr. Lester feels there should be no
discussion and that this is asinine. Councilwoman
Bennington informed him this whole thing started at the
State level and filtered down to them. Mr. Lester
guaranteed the Council was going to vote for this.
Councilwoman Bennington was sure they would vote to put it
on the ballot. Councilwoman Rhodes stated the voters will
decide if they get an extra year. Mr. Lester stated the
voters decided years ago. Why revote something? Keep
revoting to get it their way? Councilwoman Rhodes stated
now the voters get to decide if they want to save $16,000
or they don't and if that is the way they want their tax
money spent. Mr. Lester stated they could have saved
$114,000 by not buying new police cruisers but they went
ahead and voted that in.
Councilwoman Rhodes stated let's let them die. When they
are coming to his house. Mr. Lester stated he can't get
them to come to his house. He has people coming up and
down Needle Palm Drive doing 60 mph and they don't do
anything about it. One police officer told him until
somebody gets killed there will be nothing done about this.
Mayor Thomas closed the public hearing and entertained a
motion.
Councilwoman Bennington moved to approve Ord. 2008-0-07,
providing for an amendment of the City Charter, Section
3.04 UElection and Terms" and to authorize the city Clerk
to transmit to the Supervisor of Elections for inclusion on
the ballot, second by Councilwoman Rhodes.
The MOTION CARRIED 5 - 0 .
D. Ordinance No. 2008-0-08, providing for an
amendment of the City Charter by deleting Section
1.01(a)(1)
Assistant City Attorney Ciocchetti read Ord. 2008-0-08 into
the record.
Page 14 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
Acting City Manager Barlow made a staff presentation.
Mr. Heeb stated the discussion centered around the fact
that a consensus of the Committee members believed that
this is not an appropriate item to be in the City Charter.
They have studied a number of Charters and the uniform
Charter as recommended by the LOC and nowhere are there
height limitations in Charters. This is an emotional
response that was dictated by a well-orchestrated campaign
in this City to limit the height of condominiums on the
riverfront. There are not that many condominiums built on
the riverfront and the area that they could build condos on
the riverfront is limited and is addressed in the LDC which
is where height limitations belong, which he understands
are covered in the LDC at this point. They felt that they
would give the voters a second chance to take a look at
what has happened and take this out of the Charter. When
you put something in the Charter, especially a development
issue like height limitations, they have created in this
City a Planning & Zoning Board of approximately 11,000
people. What they are saying is if there is a variance
necessary, somebody has to go to the citizens and say they
would like them to amend the Charter to allow this person
or entity to develop a building that would be a little bit
higher. He commented on the inconsistencies that are
created by the issue that is in the Charter. If they read
the height limitations in the Charter it creates problems
in a number of communities where the street might be below
the required height of the property, where they will have
to add fill or put the house on pilings. They are
basically saying those people have to build a house that is
going to be less in stature than their next door neighbor.
The point of the matter is once you put it in the Charter
it is etched in stone and there is no way to have a
variance or change or mitigation of a problem. It doesn't
belong in the Charter and they are going to ask the
citizens to take another look and hopefully the citizens
will agree it doesn't belong in the Charter.
Mayor Thomas asked Mr. Heeb if a hospital or school wanted
to come into Edgewater right now and they were going to
build above 35 foot. He was informed that is permitted
under the Charter. Councilwoman Bennington stated at the
last election they deleted it from that. This is just
affecting residential.
Page 15 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
Mr. Heeb stated all they are saying is height limitations
belong in the Land Development Code and they are in the
Land Development Code. As he understands the Land
Development Code provides now a height limitation of 35
feet on residential in this City. Why is it necessary to
have this in. the Charter? They are etching it in stone and
haven't given anybody the ability to say they have a unique
situation. The only way they can change it is to go to the
electorate.
Councilwoman Bennington stated she understands that this
whole height thing, part of it was to keep condos from
going up on the river. Riverside Drive has a height
restriction in the Land Development Code. The last
election they took out all commercial development. This is
just deleting the left over residential houses that would
be affected allover the City.
Acting City Manager Barlow stated it is taking it out of
the Charter but it is still regulated in the Land
Development Code.
Councilwoman Bennington asked what the height limit was on
Riverside Drive. Development Services Director Darren Lear
informed her it was 26 feet. Councilwoman Bennington
stated so this is just eliminating something that shouldn't
have been there to begin with. She believed it was an
emotional issue that brought this about.
Councilman Cooper stated he thought the protection thing is
the scare of the public. It sounds like the 35-foot height
thing is another issue again by removing this. If he had
to go over 35 feet he would have to petition the Planning &
Zoning Board anyway for a variance. Mr. Lear informed him
if it is a residential building he couldn't do it.
Councilman Cooper asked about a commercial building. Mr.
Lear stated commercial only but they could not have mixed
use. Councilman Cooper stated what the Committee is
bringing back to the citizens is they already have a double
guard on this right now with the planning & zoning codes
and there is no sense discouraging a business or homeowner
or project when you have the protections in place in the
planning & zoning code. If you have it in the charter you
flatly refuse them from ever coming in and you can't do
anything.
Page 16 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
Councilwoman Rogers stated business is not part of this.
This is residential. If it is in the Land Development Code
yes somebody could petition to get a variance but what if
they petition to get a variance and the Council says no,
then they are open to potential lawsuit which is what they
went through before with Mr. Hood. That is why it was put
into the Charter. We aren't the only city that has this in
our Charter. Other cities took it and it is in the Land
Development Code. They went the extra step and went
through the same process the citizens did in this area.
They had the petitions, the signatures, they put it out
there to the voters, the voters voted it in and then they
turned around and changed things around and then the
businesses and mixed use is allowed to exceed 35 feet and
here we are again chopping it again. Councilwoman Rhodes
stated they aren't chopping it. The voters are.
Councilwoman Rogers stated if they put this back out there
it doesn't make them look very good on Council to keep
putting things out to the voters. They already made a
decision before they amended and changed things. She
didn't vote ~or it and she didn't think it would pass the
way it was and it didn't. Now they are looking at doing it
again to put it back out to the voters regarding
residential when the voters already voted for it. It
doesn't make sense. They are letting the voters do things
they have the right to do. When they don't like it or
somebody comes to them and argue the point and they may not
be citizens of Edgewater so they are going to put it back
out there on a ballot and let it be voted on again. This
is just redundant. Every time somebody goes to do
something they are going to be back in a circle.
Mr. Heeb stated putting it in the Charter doesn't preclude
somebody from suing. The difference is that having it in
the Charter means they are going to take a lawsuit if there
is a lawsuit brought they are going to fruition. They
can't modify anything because it is in the Charter. If
somebody questions the fairness or legality of this height
limitation that is in the Charter, they have to fight it
all the way. That is going to be expensive. The other
issue that keeps being brought up is that this was put in
the Charter by the voters. It was put in the Charter by
the voters voting in that particular election in which we
had a turnout of less than 20%. He spoke of 10% of the
people dictating how the City will operate and the kind of
information that is in the Charter. In his personal
opinion, it doesn't belong in the Charter. If they have to
Page 17 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
put it on the ballot for the next twenty years it should be
on the ballot because it does not belong in the Charter.
Mr. Heeb stated the Constitution of the State of Florida
had an extremely emotional issue that never should have
been on the ballot. The joke of the nation. You can't put
a pig in a box and grow it in the State of Florida. It is
in our constitution. Why was that on the ballot and how
did it get passed. The answer is that things happen.
People get emotional and they vote with their emotions
instead of their heads. He feels the 35-foot height
limitation in the Charter is an emotional issue and doesn't
belong in the Charter. Let's put it before the electorate
when we are hopefully going to have a higher turnout. If
it passes at that time they will know the majority of the
citizens wants the 35-foot height limitation. Councilwoman
Rogers stated for residential.
Councilwoman Bennington stated first this was brought up by
petition and put on. Then the Council decided. Now what
we have here is a Charter Review Committee per our own
Charter that they have to convene periodically who looked
at this and thought this was an important enough issue to
suggest to them to put it on the ballot. They aren't
arbitrarily putting it out there again. They had a
Committee that was appointed to study this and look at this
and in her personal opinion, if they are going to have
height limits in the Charter they might as well put the
Land Development Code in the Charter.
Mr. Moriarty stated the height limit
use and that is one of the problems.
use they can't go above 35 foot.
does apply to mixed
If they have mixed
Councilwoman Rhodes stated it doesn't matter if she is in
favor of 35-foot height limitation or not. She is in favor
of the voters deciding. The Charter Review Committee
thought this was important enough to put back before the
voters. She isn't going to put things before the voters
just because she thinks they are going to vote her way.
It's got to work both ways. It's not about what she wants
or doesn't want. It's about what the voters want and let
them decide.
Councilman Cooper asked for clarification from Mr. Lear.
He asked him if he felt soundly in his mind that we have
enough protection there and enough control there that they
Page 18 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
could keep unwanted building projects out of our City
whenever warranted if they exceed the limitations that are
already spelled out in the planning & zoning code. Mr.
Lear stated if someone was to ask for a variance they would
have to come before the Planning & Zoning Board. He then
spoke about appealing it to the City Council if they are
not happy with the decision made by the Planning & Zoning
Board. Councilwoman Bennington stated if they don't like
the Council's decision they can go to court.
Councilman Cooper asked Mr. Lear if he felt confident that
he had the checks and balances in place should this be
removed from the Charter. Mr. Lear informed him he did.
Mayor Thomas stated he was on the City Council when they
voted on this issue to put it in the Land Development code
along with a 75-foot lot width and net density verses gross
density. The citizens did not think that was enough and it
was a well-orchestrated campaign. They went out with
petitions and they got it. Even though it was only 10% of
20% they voted for it then. He tries to go along with all
staff recommendations and he appreciates the work they did
but he cannot support going back to the polls because this
went to the polls one time. The people voted it in. He
cannot support that.
Mayor Thomas opened the public hearing.
The following citizens spoke:
David Ross, 2803 Needle Palm Drive, stated Mr. Heeb said
consensus of the Committee. He felt it would be most
appropriate to have a dissenter up there making the same
presentation for the dissenting side for the same allocated
twenty minutes that he took to promote it.
Mr. Ross stated the pig in the box is in the Constitution
because the Legislature wouldn't do what is right by the
pig.
Mr. Ross wanted to talk about protection. Do we have
enough protection in the LDC? If you believe that five
yeas from now that any three of them can tell any developer
they so choose to bring any height he so well pleases, that
is the only protection. Three people can tell a developer
to build a 100-foot condo on the river five years from now,
that is the protection they have got. He believed Ormond
Page 19 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
Beach had it in their Charter. There are cities in Florida
that have it.
Mr. Ross wanted to address Councilwoman Rhodes but informed
her it wasn't intended to be personal. There are only two
reasons to put this back on the ballot. One is a
philosophical reason that Mr. Heeb has explained. It
doesn't belong in the Charter. There is only one other
reason and that is because three people will then be able
if it is voted in to go as high as they so choose with
residential buildings. He feels the City is unlocking it
for the developers if they put this on the ballot. He sees
no other logical reason to do it. He knows some of our
citizens truly believe it is a purely philosophical thing.
The problem with that on its own is the residential height
issue in this City is at the very core of our City's
character and beauty. Three people on the Council can
destroy that. We don't need that door opened.
Marcia Barnett, 124 Flamingo Road, stated Mr. Heeb
explained it better than anyone could have. She thanked
him for that.
Ms. Barnett stated we do need business. We have plenty of
houses that are ready to go but we don't have people that
want to live here because they can't live here and work
here. The Economic Development Board is trying very hard
to get business here. She has joined the business
development partnership in Halifax to try to influence
business. They have gone everywhere they can to try to
encourage business here. The same thing happens every time
they talk to people that want to build a business. They
are scared because they put things in the charter that
really should be in the LDC. If they bring businesses
there for people to work, they also have to consider their
families. They have children, parents and grandparents.
They need some mixed use. When they first put this in the
Charter, she thought it was emotional and people voted for
it, a very small amount. They were able to get out and get
some voter education and they had 73% of the people said
they were right and they needed to get rid of this. She
asked that they give them another chance to educate the
people that we do need this for our City. We need it for
the growth. We need Smart Growth for the businesses to
come in and help our people. She has a business in
Edgewater. They love it here and aren't going anywhere.
They want to help people prosper. She spoke of employing a
Page 20 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
student from the high school and it is hard for the high
school students to know where they are going to go after
they graduate. There is nowhere around here for them to
work. Let the people make another decision. Give them
that opportunity.
Carol Ann Stoughton, 2740 Evergreen Drive, stated she hoped
the Mayor stayed on another year. He made a big turn
around. He knows what the people stood for. This is not
an emotional issue. This is a developer's issue. Marcia
Barnett has property she can't even build houses on. She
was Mr. Cooper's campaign secretary to the tune of $7,650
that developers all kicked in. She hopes Mr. Cooper and
Ms. Bennington do not vote because she will turn it in to
the State Attorney's office because they are both in
conflict if they vote on this. They went out and carefully
discussed with individuals. People don't want it. Don't
you get it? They don't want to vote again. They don't
want cities like Orlando and high rises. They would have
to pay for snorkel trucks, more firemen, more fire houses
and yet they want to clutter up the river, clutter up the
town because these two guys are so biased for the
developers sent here they planted different people just
like they paid originally for the Fire Departments
fireworks. That was Restorations. She asked if they are
involved in the fireworks this year or were they prevalent
to the Council in some other way. They voted not to have
high rises once and she feels that is enough. The people
have spoken in the majority. The same amount of people
that put the Council in office, they voted no.
Mike Visconti, 316 Pine Breeze Drive, stated if he recalled
the vote at that time was 49 X to 49 %. The night of the
election he got a phone call stating that it was turned
down and they had lost. The next morning with the absentee
ballots came in and they had lost. As far as he was
concerned at the time was the City was divided 50/50. It
wasn't an overwhelming mandate that this has got to be
done. It was a very close call.
Dot Carlson, 1714 Edgewater Drive/624 Art Center Avenue,
New Smyrna Beach, representing ECARD, stated they are going
to keep putting this on the ballot until they have hair
lipped granny to the chin bone. What is it going to take?
The Mayor was right. This will be the third time. Is the
third time the charm? Who are they working for? She knows
who she is working for. She doesn't work at all. She has
Page 21 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
worked to get the citizens in this town aware of what is
going on. Get them involved, get them to Council. The
last time this went on the ballot before it went there they
had to have Beth Rawlins Inc do a survey. She has Jon
Williams telling people they have to get out and vote. The
Fire Department slammed every meeting she was in. They
asked ridiculous questions. It wasn't emotional until they
made it emotional. They can make it emotional again.
Jacksonville Beach has a 35-foot height limit on everything
and they aren't dying. She doesn't think this town is
going to die because we don't get 35 foot height on houses.
The motel from hell, the destroyer and killer of animals,
is 32 feet. They can live with that. We have the
businesses and have the height on them. She didn't think
people wanted to vote for this thing again. She thinks
they are getting tired of them throwing it at them. Are
they going to put signs on the fire trucks and garbage
trucks again? What is that going to cost the citizens?
They are getting tired of having to pay for this thing.
Does she regret bringing this up? Never. Would she do it
again? Absolutely. If this height on residential isn't
working for a big developer she really doesn't care.
Mayor Thomas closed the public hearing.
Councilwoman Rogers stated what it said on the TV the night
before and the results Mr. Visconti found out the next day
she doesn't pay attention to what is on the TV. They need
to go online directly to Ann McFall's website. That is
going to be your most accurate. She knew what the results
were the night before.
Councilwoman Rogers stated if it does end up going on the
ballot, she would tell people not to vote one way or the
other and then they are just moot. We are at the same
point we were. If it comes back as a close percentage and
it probably will then everybody is going to argue that
there weren't enough voters. They are going to be spinning
their wheels. They are spinning their wheels now talking
about this.
Councilwoman Rhodes also doesn't care how the developers
feel about it. She cares how the voters feel about it and
she has a philosophical issue with it. She thought last
time and she thinks this time it does not belong in the
Charter. It belongs in the Land Development Code and it is
in the Land Development Code. If the voters want to change
Page 22 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
their mind, let them change their mind. What are you
afraid of? If you realty think the voters of this City
want a 35-foot height limit then they are going to vote
this down and they don't have to be afraid of anything.
Councilwoman Bennington agreed with Councilwoman Rhodes
100%. By putting this on the ballot they are letting the
citizens tell them what they want again. They aren't
making that decision. It is up to the voters to decide.
She doesn't believe it should be in the Charter. She has
been on several Charter Review Committees and has never
seen anything like this in the Charter. She is taking it
as the committee makes this recommendation. She doesn't
care what the developers want. Nobody put any money in her
personal pocket for anything. Let the voters vote. They
are letting the voters have their say. If they don't like
it vote no. If they like it vote yes. They are letting
the voters speak and giving them that right. There is no
conspiracy here. If there was a conspiracy they wouldn't
let them vote on certain things.
Ms. Stoughton stated the developers paid for your campaign.
Mayor Thomas informed Ms. Stoughton she was out of order.
Councilman Cooper stated they have a proposition brought
forward from the committee. They put the committee in the
position. They brought these issues forward. They felt
they should judge on them. Take the vote and see what you
do here and let the voters decide or they can finish it
here tonight.
Mayor Thomas entertained a motion.
Councilwoman Rhodes moved to approve Ord. 2008-0-08,
providing for an amendment of the City Charter by deleting
Section 1.01(a)(1), second by Councilwoman Bennington.
The MOTION CARRIED 3 -2. Mayor Thomas and Councilwoman
Roqers voted NO.
8. BOARD APPOINTMENTS
A. Volusia Growth Management Commission - Mayor to
fill the expired term of Karen Hall
Mayor Thomas nominated Sandy Jones. Mayor Thomas announced
Ms. Jones was present and asked her to stand.
Page 23 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
Councilwoman Rhodes moved to approve tbe Mayor's
recommendation to appoint Sandy Jones to tbe Volusia Growtb
Management Commission, second by Councilwoman Bennington.
Tbe MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
9. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Authorization for the Mayor to execute the
Central Florida Sustainable Communities
Initiative Agreement
Acting City Manager Barlow made a staff presentation.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked if this was who Daytona used.
Acting City Manager Barlow wasn't sure. These are
architectural planners. He commented on one of their most
recent projects they have done.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked who pays them. Acting City
Manager Barlow thought they used it as a tax write off.
This is pat of what they do to give back to the central
Florida area. They try to give vision and see communities
grow. He commented on City Attorney Ansay reviewing this
before it was brought to Council. When they start this
process they will supply them with some back up information
so they understand our EAR and Land Development Code so
they can get somewhat of a flavor of our community before
they come over. He is looking at late summer that they can
start to have those community meetings here so they can get
to meet the community as well.
Councilman Cooper stated they are going to take this to the
next step. It doesn't cost us anything. We have a large
corporation that is going to show us a planning book but we
are going to develop a community committee, not just staff.
He doesn't want staff telling him what his visions are. He
would like a cross section of everybody telling them what
the vision could be and see what they come up with. Acting
City Manager Barlow wants to touch every facet of this
community. Councilman Cooper asked if they could solicit
outside where they can sign up where they would request to
serve on this committee. Acting City Manager Barlow
informed him there will be no sign up. It will be open
town hall meetings on Saturday mornings and Wednesday
Page 24 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
evenings. The Council will see all this and hear all this
and essentially will be in charge at the end of the day.
Councilman Cooper stated they are going to bring them back
a book. Acting City Manager Barlow stated at the
conclusion they will do a presentation when they present
the Vision Book.
Councilman Cooper stated the overall intent is to be able
to present something back to our citizens. Councilwoman
Bennington stated it is going to be a combination of
everybody.
There was a brief discussion regarding this being free and
it seeming too good to be true.
Due to there being no comments, Mayor Thomas opened and
closed the public hearing.
Councilwoman Bennington moved to approve the Central
Florida Sustainable Communities Initiative Agreement and
authorize the Mayor to execute, second by Councilman
Cooper.
The MOTION CARRIED 5 - 0 .
10. OFFICER REPORTS
A. City Clerk
City Clerk Wenzel commented on receiving a letter from the
Florida League of Cities. Every year they request a voting
delegate from each municipality. It's a consensus of the
Council to pick someone. She has to let them know by July
27th. She informed Council they could discuss this further
at the July 21st meeting.
Councilwoman Bennington informed her it was okay to give
them her name.
City Clerk Wenzel mentioned this past Saturday Inlet
Charlie Skate Shop sponsored a skateboarding contest at
Whistle Stop Park and Jill Danigel was very instrumental in
help coordinating it. The City was a co-sponsor of this
event. There were about 30 kids that participated from age
6 to 45. Jill participated as did Shelly from our Finance
Department. They placed second and third place
Page 25 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
respectively in their category. It was a very hot day but
it was great. It was something they would like to see more
of doing every year.
Councilwoman Bennington asked City Clerk Wenzel to tell
Deputy City Clerk Bloomer she really appreciated the effort
she has made on the minutes.
B. City Attorney
Assistant City Attorney Ciocchetti stated City Attorney
Ansay asked him to update them on the status of the Deck
action and they are currently trying to schedule a hearing
time with Judge Rouse. They will let them know when they
have that hearing date.
C. City Manager
Acting City Manager Barlow reminded Council of some
upcoming dates. July 7th the Council meeting is cancelled.
That pushes them to July 21st with a cost allocation
workshop at 6 p.m. and a Council meeting at 7 p.m. He
reminded them August 4th had been cancelled. The three
proceeding Mondays they have budget hearings and workshops.
The Council meeting will be held on August 18th.
Councilwoman Rhodes stated on July 21st she would
there. On the Charter Amendment for the 35-foot
amendment it looks like it would be a two to two
They might want to provide for that contingency.
wasn't sure what they do in that respect.
not be
height
vote.
She
Councilwoman Bennington suggested they have a special
meeting when Councilwoman Rhodes can be there.
Acting City Manager Barlow asked if they have done it in
the past with it being telephoned in. Assistant City
Attorney Ciocchetti stated he has had meetings where
Councilmembers have called in. Councilwoman Rhodes stated
she was going to be on an airplane that evening. She could
give them a written vote. She told them to tell her what
to do. Assistant City Attorney Ciocchetti stated she
couldn't do that but they could have a special meeting.
Acting City Manager Barlow stated they would have to make a
decision pretty quick because it will have to be
advertised. Councilwoman Rhodes apologized and said she
wouldn't be on the plane and could call it in. She is
Page 26 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
coming home the next day. Acting City Manager Barlow asked
if that was permissible. Assistant City Attorney
Ciocchetti stated he believed so. He agreed to confirm
that. He was of the understanding that she would have to
attend the whole meeting.
Acting City Manager Barlow stated another option if that is
a concern, they could consider rescheduling the meeting to
July 28th. Mayor Thomas told him to do it. That is the
VCOG meeting but he could leave early. He would reschedule
the cost allocation as well that evening.
It was the consensus of Council to move the meeting to July
28th.
Mayor Thomas thanked the Charter Review Committee for all
their hard work.
1) Tentative Agenda Items
Acting City Manager Barlow asked City Clerk Wenzel to
update the list of Tentative Agenda Items and put it in
Council's box tomorrow.
11. CITIZEN COMMENTS
The following citizen spoke:
Mike Visconti, 316 Pine Breeze Drive, stated at the last
meeting Mrs. Carlson brought in a picture of a rain barrel.
Today they had one of the best rains we have had in three
months. Just think if they had a rain barrel how much
water they could conserve today. Councilwoman Rhodes
stated they are looking into that.
Mr. Visconti asked if there was a way a developer or
builder could take the reclaimed water and pipe it right to
the toilet to flush the toilet. They talk about conserving
water but nobody does anything about it.
Councilwoman Bennington stated that was when they
originally did the sewer system in Florida Shores and the
reclaimed. That was a consideration but there was
something about the bacterial content and they didn't want
to take a chance because dogs and kids can get into
toilets. She didn't know if the technology had improved or
not. Mr. Visconti stated in a new development that comes
Page 27 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
in there should be a law on the books saying that they have
to put reclaimed water into the flushing. They want to
conserve water. That is the way to conserve water.
Councilwoman Rhodes agreed with that. She didn't have a
problem putting that in the Land Development Code for all
new development
Acting City Manager Barlow commented on there being very
strict restrictions with the reclaimed water. There is
movement out there to try and address some of that to try
to address some of that. He didn't believe it was
acceptable yet.
12 . ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to discuss, the meeting
adjourned at 9:40 p.m.
Minutes submitted by:
Lisa Bloomer
Page 28 of 28
Council Regular Meeting
June 16, 2008
, .'
I
'j
I.~/
''''7 . /
,./ C/)( /( ( f:..
Mayor: M. Thomas
Suggestion: by Ted Cooper City Councilmen Dist. #4
During the moment of silence tonight: Please mention the passing of Joe
M. Piggotte a South Daytona Little League Coach that touche~ all our
lives in V olusia County and was a positive symbol to the youth that he
dedicated himself too.
ALSO:
We are further saddened by the passing of Joe Yarbrough's mother. Mrs.
Yarbrough and the entire family was a personal friend of Coach Piggotte
and also a dedicated force in Volusia County. Joe Yarbrough a South
Daytona city manager.
There are heavy hearts in those two families this month.
, --
J
COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 16,2008 - Ted Cooper Dist. #4
My report tonight is more of a public service notice.
First I want to extend a heartfelt thank you to the organizers and staff
presenting the FISH FRY for all Employees.
This is a further example of unity and morale building efforts on
everyone's part. Sorry that I could not attend but a previous speaking
engagement kept me away.
This Thursday, June 19,2008 between 5:00 and 7:00 PM our very own
Mayor Thomas and acting City Manager Tracy Barlow will try to out
whit, and outlast the challenges of Jack Heyman and other city and
county officials. The V olusia County Safety Awareness Day, Wheel
Chair Race and Obstacle course, is held during the Seaside Fiesta
Festival, on Flagler Ave., New Smyrna Beach, FL
I wanted to give a shout out to the AM Channel 12301WSBB, Skip and
Susanne, including staff invite us to speak after each council meeting.
The AM station is helping to keep citizens informed and aware of what
is happening in Edgewater. The time to tune in is between 7:15 AM and
8:30 AM, scheduling is hectic, but they do fit us in, and I thank them for
their efforts. Listen In!
A bit more serious tonight we about to adopt Charter Review
amendments that effect everyone sitting up here and all of you living in .
. this community, I ask that you listen carefully to all the facts and how
the facts pertain to the changes. If we all are aware of the facts we just
might be able to stymie any false rumors or implied miss-
understandings. This is very important folks and we all must get this
right.
END OF REPORT