11-12-2008
CITY OF EDGEWATER
Planning and Zoning Board
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
6:30 p.m.
EdgewaterCommunityCenter 102 N.RiversideDrive
AGENDA
1.CALL TO ORDER
2.ROLL CALL
3.APPROVAL OF MINUTESRegular meeting of October 8, 2008
4.OLD BUSINESS- PUBLIC HEARING
None at this time.
5.NEW BUSINESS- PUBLIC HEARING
a.VA-0805 – Janet Severt, applicant, requesting a variance from Article V of the CityofEdgewater
Land Development Code, for property located at 128 Evergreen Ave.
b.VA-0806-Daniel Johns, applicant, requesting variancesfromArticleVof the City of Edgewater Land
Development Code, for property located at 310 N. Ridgewood Ave.
c.Review and Recommendation to the City Council of the amendments to the CapitalImprovements
Element (CIE) and the accompanying Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
d.City of Edgewater, requesting an amendment to the Planning and Zoning Board By-Laws.
6.OTHER BUSINESS
None at this time.
7.DISCUSSION ITEMS
a.Development Services Director’s Report
b. Chairman’sReport
c.Agency Members’ Report
8.ADJOURNMENT
Pursuant to Chapter 286, F.S., if an individual decides to appeal any decision made withrespecttoanymatter
considered at a meeting or hearing, that individual will need arecordofthe proceedings and will need to ensure
that a verbatim record of the proceeding is made.The City does not prepare or provide such record.
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons needing assistance to participate in any of these
proceedingsshouldcontact City Clerk Bonnie Wenzel, 104 N. Riverside Drive, Edgewater, Florida, telephone
number 386-424-2400 ext. 1101, 5 days prior to themeetingdate. If you are hearing impaired or voice impaired,
contact the relay operator at 1-800-955-8771.
Citizen comments are to be limited to five (5) minutes
CITY OF EDGEWATER
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
INFORMATION SUMMARY
CASE # VA-0805
OWNER: Janet Severt
APPLICANT/AGENT: Janet Severt
REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is requesting an "after the fact" variance from
Article V, Section 21-50.02 (Table V-I) of the City of Edgewater Land Development Code to
allow for a 21' front set back in lieu of a 30' front set back for construction of a wheelchair
ramp for access to a wood deck.
PROPOSED USE: Single Family Residence
LOCATION: 128 Evergreen Ave.
AREA: .25::i: acres
CURRENT LAND USE: Single Family Residence
FLUM DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential
ZONING DISTRICT: R-3 (Single Family Residential)
VOTING DISTRICT: 1
SURROUNDING AREA:
Current Land Use FLUM Desilrnation Zonine District
North Single Family Low Density Residential R-3 (Single Family
Residence Residential)
East Single Family Low Density Residential R -1 (Single Family
Residence Residential)
South Single Family Low Density Residential R-3 (Single Family
Residence Residential)
West Single Family Low Density Residential R-3 (Single Family
Residence Residential)
Background The subject property contains a 470 sq. ft. wood deck, which encroaches nine
feet (9') into the front setback. The applicant is requesting a variance to construct a
wheelchair ramp to gain access to the deck.
Land Use Compatibility: The area is designated as a residential low-density land use and
Single Family Residential is compatible with the surrounding area.
I
Adequate Public Facilities: The property is served by City water and sewer, and has access
to Evergreen Ave.
Natural Environment
This site is has no known environmental issues.
Comprehensive Plan Consistency
The Comprehensive Plan does not directly address this matter.
Other matters
Per the City of Edgewater Land Development Code Section 21-10.04, in order to grant a
non-administrative variance, the P&ZB shall make the following findings of fact:
1. That granting of the proposed variance is not in conflict with the Comprehensive
Plan;
2. That granting of the proposed variance will not result in creating or continuing a
use, which is not compatible with adjacent uses in the area;
3. That granting of the proposed variance is the minimum action available to permit
reasonable use of the property;
4. That the physical characteristics of the subject site are unique and not present on
adjacent sites; and
5. That the circumstances creating the need for the variance are not the result of
actions by the applicant, or actions proposed by the applicant.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of a variance for a 21' front set back in lieu of the required 30'
from Chapter V, Section 21-50.02 (Table V-I) of the City of Edgewater Land Development
Code.
MOTION
Motion to approve a variance for a 21' front setback in lieu ofthe required 30' from Chapter
V, Section 21-50.02 (Table V-I) of the City of Edgewater Land Development Code.
2
~
CIl
1:: III 8-
Q) :I:! ~
a; Z~ ~ -g
en ~ 'E
._ :l
CJ en
~IJJ
-
1-
1
Y' C \:- IO~
-AI -~~~~
~
~'7. ~ \ ,:-, .\,~V"l' /~
011 6 - .... ,\\ ' "" ...---\>' /. 1--'/
,.; \ G ,<"" ~I~\ ~ - ~\ \- (.5.~./
"... ~ ~ _ _' .:- ~n v.It' II: 'Z.---5, - I \/~
~ 0 -" v-:;:("l I ~ :>\: ~ /"O~/ ~~~\,y
~ ~~~~ 11__ ~~ ~ 'Z{" :::l - GO \,-,,'(
I.' \li ~ _ '" ":: , 1---1 t:!) '" \ \ -~.. \ ~I
~~ I' .~~~ \ "- ~I ~ -v---Y> .) ~ ,/v'" \\),
J ~~ ~~~l.. --r ;:>' \'.\ t ;:2 ~ ~\
u .4J '''\ ~ : \ , _ .).,W"
ii \/;;i")-" \ ,",",/ 1/ l):j~~i;.tl \ ...~~ j
;; ..' \' ___1 ~ V , ~ ~ ' -P'\:.l'\
~ ... --' ~ \",_{ 'H _ /: ~J V~, ,/ ~
--'\~ Q ~)7Z ~\ - k b@- (\ ~// ~ '\
~ r,~'er~~\~';' '" ~ ~~
\e ~J1. 'r ~~ ... ~ ~ ,,///
,(C 1._;' ,~(\\\ _ .. ~ V\ '
~~~~v~ ~ ~ \ ~~~
::- ~ Q lt~ ~ ~ \" 't, \':2 \ r-I:fl- ~ ~ ~,u~~/ \
t; ::;\\ ~ 'Y' ....\~ \ _ --'~ "=' ,/ ~n M{-' \ \.
_\..'~ u ... ----L-- · 1- - 'n ~ "'\;or ,-y-' .-->/
Iq \ - \ ~I' = O~\ \ \3,'f' ~ ~ '
1\ ~~ S''l- -1 JB\ \ '" ,~" U
I~I-- (C~~ loll r ""-~~U'~ ~\i: I ~ \ - S;~
i J ~ \ \ .. rr "'-'-" ~ ~ IV f\J'l ------ '<
"- ~j \ V~ ~ ~"-,
-'
t..----'
SHEET 2 OF 2
SEE SHEET 1 FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION. LEGEND 8< ABBREVIATIONS.
tv
. DENOTES 5/8" IRON ROD W/
CAP "LB 7220" SET
o DENOTES 1/2" IRON PIPE
(NO IDENTIFICATION) RECOVERED
o DENOTES 4" X 4" CONCRETIE MONUMENT
{NO IDENTIFICATION> RECOVERED
@ DENOTES 1/2" IRON PIPE
(NO IDENTIFICATION) RECOVERED
EVERGREEN AVENUE (50' R/W)
(0
20':i: ASPHALT PAVDAENT
(
100.00'(P)(M)
O~/r. . . . . . . .o/u
254.00' TO
~QRTH RIVERSIDE DRIVE
50""
b
LOT~ 4
~~ .
~~ ~
-(1)0
OC\!
00.
'1'
~~
I-
o
...J
lt~
~~ ~2,:' 1;.4~.~
Ooqo~ u~*
<:tog XI::
(l)c\!~
o 0 .
~~ 2.a) ,..1
ZZ b
,.:
'"
25.2'
e;~
- 0)
010
oq.
'(0
~~
(I)
~~
o.~
w~ I-
0;"" 0
Ooq ...J
<:tCr>
(I)~
o 0
(0(0
UHf)
o
"?
".2.a
8'X 12"
FRAME SHED
"
oj
!5Q'(P)
( 5.3' 5Q'(PJ
WOOD FENCE J
.... F'EI"lCE 0.75
./
,4..4..8'
S 73026'00" W(P)
S 73004'08" W(M)
100.00'(P)
99.79'(M)
LOT
ASSESSOR'S SUBDIVISION OF THE G. ALVAREZ GRANT
M.B. 3, PG. 137
4B
..--
il, .. 1 J .
.. ~ I~I~ :. ~~I~I
.. l'j ~ ., sP S Ii ~ UO,r!O!e5
~ fil z ~ II~ i; ...~ ' ~'rl~ II
0 B ~I P I II jpl i5 i:i .=1
~ pi ~ .. ;; .~. 8 a ~a ~ ~ jl
E ,i' ~ ~d n ~ I E ~~li a ~ o .'
8 ill :x:: ~
~ ~~ ~ ~ I _ t. In ~IJ j~1
I !~UiU #7 . '"
i - d~UI~1 ~'"
~ :=.
_")j -r;-'j ~
-' J
"l' ~h
"', ) u .:,
'. '4,1 --;.;.~..... ,I
;...,j ,/:: 1 (.~ t
V'\ ..:, J fl.
,. .' -a ') ~
~.. ...~v .::- 4-
.:~~
.-."
....-
.n
C.-"
<~
-'
'-<
'.....~ <,..)
'<--;."
,..!
.....!l
~t~
.r;
'.,I
...".
r 1 .:
.....
.....
J .....
z
.
./'-' B t'~-'
.... CD __ ! ~ .. -:
I -r~~' ~ ., :,
. ~:~ .~ ,Bo ". A ~I~ .....1 = :.. >' /I'!" .-.....~ M!
.;... ~,w ~~ P -....~l ~.
I-- -... ) ~ , .
I ~ ..-oFi 1 OM ~h/ 'f!~ I
I ." .1_"-
t ,I! ~ .ij!J~ I
.~ ~h_J
,::: I ~ ) \J II ~ b i! ~
'L~ :.~ ~ --~ ~~
;i _>- ~~~ ~~ z~
..';= : ,!..I-; I~I~! BII 'l ~ ~ :If:
;.~':} : ~ ~-~ - hi <kl ...... l.o-~II
,;: : sl n ~ ~ /~. ~ ,,$- III
. ,II 1 ~Q '.l\!l r- III
2: t}~1~ /~I ;I! ~ (
!;~ --- : '! ~ !0.~ ~
51' ,,!f ~
l-:i- .~.L .p:-. .1~.l:1 'r
I''''. ..... ~II ~ BII~
o : Nrl I ~ . ~ ~
. ~ 1:--~::~ ~1'll:X1OO 0
..... '_A ,(0'-' '.fo-. .'" JI '1]1 1
ill :I! ~
1
.
..... ....
'-A
1
!
t
1
1
~ t
1
~
~
~
~
i
j ~
. :
~ ~
.: )j
1
~
1I~1\1>'l.'
:;.
~
,-...
-~ ..~:~_.
.,:,~
.l-."
_._m.~"1I
,~ I
z
... ....-.A .. ,11-'" .. r.t
.. ,,,.
v
(
~7.-'
/'
<.-
l..::,
,,..' -~~...
.~
C...l.~--
~~
,
.'
~..-..
.
-'
~-'
t.,~ i
\......)'"~
.........-.:..
~.::.--v-
I 'l.f) I
S(.l,.~c;\(
CITY OF EDGEWATER
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
INFORMATION SUMMARY
CASE # VA-0806
OWNER: Edgewater Alliance Church
APPLICANT/AGENT: Daniel Johns, P.E.
REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is requesting variances from the following sections
of the Land Development Code:
· Section 21-54.03(b) - to eliminate the requirement that landscaped areas shall be
protected from vehicular encroachment with effective curbs and to allow wheel stops
which are permitted only when certain stormwater conditions warrant their use;
and;
· Section 21-57.02(k)-to allow a grass parking area in lieu of the requirement that
parking areas shall be hard-surfaced using material approved by the City
PROPOSED USE: expansion of existing church facility
LOCATION: 310 N. Ridgewood Avenue
AREA: 4.69:i: acres
CURRENT LAND USE: Church
FLUM DESIGNATION: Public/Semi-Public
ZONING DISTRICT: B-3 (Highway Commercial)
VOTING DISTRICT: 1
SURROUNDING AREA:
Current Land Use FLUM Desienation Zonine District
North Multi - Family Commercial B-3 (Highway
Residential Commercial)
(Apartments)
East Commercial Commercial B-3 (Highway
Commercial)
South Single Family Commercial/High Density B-3 (Highway
Residential! Multi- Residential Commercial)/R-5 (Multi-
Family Residential Family Residential
(Apartments)
West Vacant and Single High Density Residential R-5 (Multi- Family
and Multi-Family Residential
Residential
G:\Planning and Zoning Board\Jnfo Summaries\2008\V A-0806 - Edgewaler Alliance Church - 310 N. Ridgewood.doc
Background
The applicant is requesting a variance to allow for unimproved (grass) parking
requirements. The applicant is currently undergoing Site Plan review for expansion of the
existing church facilities. The proposed unimproved parking area will be utilized for
overflow parking.
Land Use Compatibility:
The proposed commercial use is compatible with the surrounding commercial uses along
U.S. Highway 1.
Adequate Public Facilities:
This site is served by the City's water and sewer service area and has direct roadway access
to U.s. Highway 1.
Natural Environment
This site is has no known environmental issues.
Comprehensive Plan Consistency:
The commercial use of the property is consistent with Goal 1 of the City of Edgewater
Comprehensive Plan, Future Land Use Element which states "To effectively manage the
land use pattern in the City to enhance the quality of life for its citizens; promote economic
vitality; and, accommodate population and development growth in an environmentally
acceptable manner."
Other matters
Prior to development, the Technical Review Committee must approve the proposed site
plan.
Per the City of Edgewater Land Development Code Section 21-10.04, in order to grant a
non-administrative variance, the P&ZB shall make the'following findings of fact:
1. That granting of the proposed variance is not in conflict with the Comprehensive
Plan;
2. That granting of the proposed variance will not result in creating or continuing a
use, which is not compatible with adjacent uses in the area;
3. That granting of the proposed variance is the minimum action available to permit
reasonable use of the property;
4. That the physical characteristics of the subject site are unique and not present on
adjacent sites; and
5. That the circumstances creating the need for the variance are not the result of
actions by the applicant, or actions proposed by the applicant.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the varIance requests from the City of Edgewater Land
Development Code as follows:
· Section 21-54.03(b) - to eliminate the requirement that landscaped areas shall be
protected from vehicular encroachment with effective curbs; and
· Section 21-57.02(k)-to allow a grass parking area in lieu of the requirement that
parking areas shall be hard-surfaced using material approved by the City
for property located at 310 N. Ridgewood Avenue.
G:\Planning and Zoning Board\Info Summaries\2008\V A-0806 - Edgewaler Alliance Church - 310 N. Ridgewood.doc 2
MOTION
Motion to approve the variance request from the City of Edgewater Land Development Code
as follows:
· Section 21-54.03(b) - to eliminate the requirement that landscaped areas shall be
protected from vehicular encroachment with effective curbs; and
· Section 21-57.02(k)-to allow a grass parking area in lieu of the requirement that
parking areas shall be hard-surfaced using material approved by the City
for property located at 310 N. Ridgewood Avenue.
G:\Planning and Zoning Board\Info Summaries\200gW A-Og06 - Edgewater Alliance Church - 310 N. Ridgewood.doc
3
~
~
. J1 ll:
~ Oi: 1j
.c :z~ :J O~
o .a- ,Q
""') u ~
~IIJ
~
~
~
~s
(.~
-,......-"
//
?
)
/
\
\
"
21
o
"
(MMl93ti\'l1 am61lUJ~
c "
..
~
c
"
"
.
il~~ ii~
:II
~,
.. ~-
10',
<: d1~
~i~
~,}
~ii ., oM fi
" SOli,",""
1;- ~- ~ -'"'
..."1 .. l!jt3f
, ~ ,. i
" f:
.t ~~
'....... ;M
It
f
;;r
',~
~
'1.U:Jl~~,: I
Cr
.------
~ ~ 'if'
~-::::"--~J/,D
-- ~___ .t.
(H),'J7'~I<:l (~XG)i'..n~,Sl:.22N
~
<!1
!:.2:
"8~!
III
88
!i
II
b
!ll
III
~~i
m !
I
I
I
8
I
I
it : t R' ~l I ~
I! 1111 III r"j ,.,
i I; n in
I
I
I
I
II
I
~
/1"
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
INFORMATION SUMMARY
CASE # CP A-0802
APPLICANT/AGENT: City of Edgewater
REQUESTED ACTION: Amend the Comprehensive Plan to update the Capital Improvements Element (CIE)
and the accompanying Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
Background
The CIE identifies the capital improvements that are necessary for implementation of the Comprehensive Plan
and ensure maintenance and achievement of Level of Service (LOS) standards for concurrency-related facilities,
i.e. transportation, potable water, sanitary sewer, schools, recreation and open space, stormwater and solid
waste.
The Five-Year Capital Improvement Schedule must be financially feasible pursuant to the 2005 Growth
Management Act (Senate Bill 360). Florida Statutes defines that financial feasibility means that sufficient
revenues are currently available or will be available from committed funding sources for the first three (3) years,
or will be available from committed or planned funding sources for years 4 and 5, of a 5-year capital
improvement schedule for financing capital improvements.
Comprehensive Plan Consistency
The amended CIE shall be submitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs and all required local
regulatory agencies after adoption.
Other Matters
The CIE Amendment is exempt from the normal biannual Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends sending a favorable recommendation to City Council for the amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan by updating the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) and the accompanying Capital
Improvement Program (CIP).
MOTION
Motion to send a favorable recommendation to City Council for the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan by
updating the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) and the accompanying Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
G:\Planning and Zoning Board\lnfo Summaries\2008\CPA-0802 - CIE.doc
.r .
CITY OF EDGEWATER, FL
~
I
I
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM
t:
I
FY 2008-2009 TO 2012-2013
~
l
~
II
,
~
:JL. __ _ __ _ ___ _ ______-_ _______- _ _ - - - -- - ...c.I\..
The Capital Improvement Program as set forth in this document is a long range planning tool for the
City of Edgewater. The document reflects five years of capital outlay with the first year officially
adopted as part of the fiscal year 2008-2009 budget by the City Council. The remaining years in the
CIP serve as a planning guide, which is reviewed annually.
The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) provides a planned and programmed approach to utilizing
the City's financial resources in the most responsive and efficient manner to meet its service and
facility needs. The CIP serves as a "blueprint" for the future of the community. Development of the
CIP requires integration of financial, engineering, and planning functions.
The CIP also incorporates needs identified in the Capital Improvements Element (CIE). The CIE
focuses on anticipated infrastructure requirements for six facility types required by the State of
Florida, Parks, Solid Waste, Stormwater, Transportation, Water, and Wastewater.
The CIE focuses on service level standards and the land use plan adopted by the City Council in order
to preclude deficiencies in adopted level of services. The CIP is developed to achieve the following
results:
* Consolidating and coordinating all department requests with the goal of reducing
unnecessary delays and coordinating individual departments' improvement programs.
* Establishing a system of procedures and priorities by which each proposal can be
evaluated in terms of public need, the comprehensive planning of the area, and the
interrelationships of projects and cost requirements.
* Scheduling capital projects over an extended period so the most efficient financial plan for the
CIP can be achieved.
* Assuring that the s-year schedule of improvements for each type of facility is financially feasible.
* Successfully implement level of service standards for public facilities as outlined in
Florida Statutes Chapter 163, part of which states:
Provide that public facilities and services meet or exceed the standards
established in the Capital Improvements Element required by F.S. 163.3177
and are available when needed for the development, or that development
orders and permits are conditioned on the availability of these public
facilities and services necessary to serve the proposed development. Not
later than one year after its due date established by the state land planning
agency's rulefor submission of local comprehensive plans pursuant to
F.S. 163.3167(2), a local government shall not issue a development order or permit
which results in a reduction in the level of services for the effected public facilities
below the level of services provided in the comprehensive plan of the local government.
Table 1
City of Edgewater
Capital Improvement Schedule
Fiscal Years Ending 2009-2013
Project Fiscal Year Total
2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
Vehicle Renlacemen S206 000.00 S300 01)0.01) 5350 000.00 5200000.00 S 1 056 0(1).00
12 Lcad/ EKG Monitor 525 OUO.OO 525 000.00
Geni~i~ Extrication Tool Sv~tem 5.10 000.00 S30.000.00
Sclfrontained Breather Annaratu~ S I 00 000.00 5100000.00
Fire Dent. Totals $206.000.00 $300.000.00 5350.000.00 $30.000.00 $325.000.00 $1.211.000.00
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Vehicle RenIacement 5103616.UO 5112 OOO.UO 584 OOu.OO 5S6.00U.OO SI12.00U.OO 5467 (,16.00
Police Station Land ACl1ui~ition ~OOO.O() 580 000.00
Radio Svstem Renlacement 520(J 000.00 5200 000.00
Police Dent. Totals 5183,616.00 $312,000.00 $84,000.00 $56,000.00 $112,000.00 $747,616.00
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES'
POLICE DEPARTMENT'
-
Vehicle Renlacement 5209.7 50.UO 5410 OOO.UO S770 OOU.OO S620 OOU.OO S7SU OOU.OO 52.759750.00
Wa~tewater Slin lininn 5200000.00 5200 000.00
Bar Screen WWfp 5120.000.00 5120000.00
SE Service Area De~inn & romtruction 5101.400.00 S2 000 000.00 S2 101 .100.00
Retrofit Lift Station 1 2.13 570000.00 540 ooo.nO S70000.00 SI80.(JnO.(JO
2) 25 HI' Comnrc~sor~ WWfp S30000.00 S.10.000.00
We~tern Stora"e Tank & Pumn Station 5130000.00 S 1.~0 000.00
W\vrp Rehab/Renlacement 53 000 000.00 53 000 (100.00 56.000000.00
2.5 MGD Wa~tewater Treatment Plant 5 I OOll oou.nu 57 SOU.OOu.OU 56 SOll OOU.OO S 15 000 OUO.OO
SE Service Area Reclaimed lmnrovement~ 53S0.000.00 55.000.000.00 5S 3S0 000.00
ART well~ 17 18 1920 51 210 931.00 51210931.00
l\erator and ~tairwav renlacement 5200000.00 5200 (100.00
rlaricone Paintin<> 51 OU 000.00 S100000.00
Renlacement of 2" Water Line~ 54U.000.OO 540 000.00
We~tern Reclaimed Water Main Exten~ion 53SU 000.00 53 SUO 000.00 53 850000.00
Sliolininn exi~itnn njne~-Wildwood Sl1bdivi~ion 52S.000.00 5_~O 000.00 530000.UO 5210 OUll.OO 5"95.00().OO
Ea~tern Shore~ Proiect 596 750.00 596.750.00
Environmental Services Totals $2.378.831.00 S6.305.000.00 $13.370.000.00 $8.150,000.00 $7.460.000.00 $37.663.831.00
Vehicle Renlac"ment S25 noo.oo 568 000.00 530000.00 5148000.0n 5271 000.00
Animal Shelter 52 SO 000.00 5250000.00
Hawk~ Park Amnithcatrc 5183175.00 S 183 17S.00
Kennedv Park Rennnvation~ 52S5.00(J.OO 52900UO.O(J 554500U.00
DolY Park 5S0.0(JO.00 S50.000.00
MaJ1l'o Lake Park 5500 000.00 5500 000.00
I-lamer Li"l1id rnlled Dcwpe~ Slone Mowcr 525000.QO $25 000
Parks and Recreation Totals $688.175.00 $50,000.00 ~OOO.OO mpOO.OO 5988.000.00 $1.824.175
LEISURE SERVICES'
Vehicle Rcnlaccment 5(51)00.00 565 000.00
rleet rue! Tank Renlacement S 125 OOO.lJO 5 12S 000.00
30th Street Sidewalk SIS7716.0() 5157716.00
Road RenavinlY 5335 272.00 54S0 000.00 5475000.00 5S00.000.00 5S00 000.00 52 260 272.00
Public Works Totals S617.988.00 $515.000.00 $475.000.00 5500.000.00 $500.000.00 52.607.988.00
All Proiects Totals 54.074.610.00 57 .482.000.00 $14.347.000.00 $8.766.000.00 $9.385.000.00 $44.054.610.00
Source: City of Edgewater Planning Divi~ion, 2008.
PUBLIC WORKS'
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
TOTAL
FUNDING SOURCES FY08-09 FY09-10 FY10-11 FY11-12 FY12.13 FIVE YEARS
General Fund
General Fund Revenues $ $ 225,000 $ $ 30,000 $ 125,000 $ 380,000
CDBG Grant 87,461 87,461
ECHO Grant 83,175 840,000 923,175
FRDAP Grant 200,000 200,000
FOOT Grant- 30th Street Sidewalk 118,287 118,287
Prior Year Appropriations 582,240 582,240
Transportation Impact Fees 80,000 80,000
Police Impact Fees 80,000 80,000
Local Option Gas Tax 450,000 475,000 500,000 500,000 1,925,000
Recreation Impact Fees 155,000 155,000
Debt Proceeds 309,616 502,000 502,000 86,000 460,000 1,859,616
General Fund Totals 1,695,779 1,177,000 977 ,000 616,000 1,925,000 6,390,779
Water and Sewer Fund
Interest Earnings 50,000 50,000
Transfer from Water Development 783,558 2,130,000 370,000 3,283,558
Transfer from Sewer Development 587,373 700,000 4,500,000 7,500,000 6,500,000 19,787,373
Transfer from Operating 5%
of Revenues 450,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 2,050,000
Proprietary Appropriations 250,000 220,000 350,000 820,000
Debt Proceeds 161,150 3,050,000 8,070,000 11,281,150
Water and Sewer Fund Totals 2,282,081 6,280,000 13,340,000 8,120,000 7,250,000 37,272,081
Storm water Fund
Indian River Lagoon License Plate 16,750 16,750
Proprietary Appropriations 25,000 30,000 30,000 210,000 295,000
Cost Share Grant 80,000 80,000
Storm water Fund Totals 96,750 25,000 30,000 30,000 210,000 391,750
Total Revenues from All Sources $ 4,074,610 $ 7,482,000 $ 14,347,000 $ 8,766,000 $ 9,385,000 $ 44,054,610
Sources of Revenue
Stormwater Fund
1%
General Fund
15%
rr~'~=- ~ ~.
_". #;.-~_~#_,__.",.'A-
o General Fund
IilWater and Sewer Fund
o Stormwater Fund
Water and Sewer Fund
84%
SUMMARY OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Facility Type FY 08-09 FY09-10 FY10-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 Total
Fire Department $206.000 $300.000 $350.000 $30.000 $325.000 $1 ,211 ,000
Police Department 183,616 312.000 84,000 56.000 112.000 747.616
Environmental Services 2.378.831 6,305,000 13,370,000 8.150,000 7.460.000 37.663.831
Leisure Services 688,175 50,000 68.000 30.000 988,000 1.824,175
Public Works 617,988 515,000 475,000 500.000 500.000 2,607.988
Total Capital
Improvements $4.074.610 $7.482.000 $14.347.000 $8.766.000 $9.385.000 $44.054.610
SUMMARY OF COMMITTED AND PLANNED FUNDS
Fund FY -08-09 FY09-10 FY10-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 Total
General Fund $1 ,695,779 $1 , 177,000 $977.000 $616.000 $1.925,000 $6.390,779
Water and Sewer Fund 2.282.081 6.280,000 13,340,000 8,120.000 7.250.000 37,272.081
Stormwater Fund 96.750 25.000 30,000 30,000 210.000 391.750
Total Committed and
Planned Funds $4.074.610 $7 ,482.000 $14.347 .000 $8.766.000 $9.385.000 $44.054.610
o
Z
::l
zu.
~ti
o.W
<l:f-'
Czo
ii1wO::
o::!:o.
;iw~
-Eif-
O::o::ii:
Wo.<l:
~::!:o
~::i~
CI<l:i=
C!::O
wo.::l
u.<l:o::
OOf-
~~~
_wo
0>0
W-l
><l:
U:ffi
Z
W
CI
~IllOOOOO"""OC")
cc,...,..cooaONOCC
~~aooooLOO..-
"'r-:crioocicittitriuicD
C;CONOCOCOOlll..-C\lCO
'0 "l:t N ,....,.... ~,....
1-. ~~
'"
0
0
M 0
... 0
N ...
... ~
0
'"
'"
o
o
I . I I 10
o
...
~
...
...
.:.
0
'"
'"
0
...
m
0
0
'"
'"
......\000000,.... l")
J!l", W,.....OOOOON , CD
""'''-OOOOOlll '":
CJo "':criociciciu-llli
Cll . 0
0'''' CCCOOCOC:OOU")_
...0 N ... ..... "'0
0.0
d:!
Cllu.
z
'" '"
on
~ 5
m:;:;
Cll '"
.<: >
;:: 0
.<: c:
a.'"
EO::
<l:-c
-'" '"
CD roa..
E 0.>-
co ~ -g' ~
~ _Ctn ~~ ~
g~~~:g J:~oni!?
~(;(5<9LL c:
QJ(!)O~u ~~gm
0::: mIO ~UJ,=,=.~>VJ
OUO::E~ggg.~w
uwu.-u. o.o.......2u
1"gtJEE~::J~
-g-g-g~ [~~<(~5
~~aI5Eggm-gCf)
!!~1!!~-;~~>-g;i
~~~~~g~.g-Eb
ClCICIl--o.O::O::Cl.::l1--
11l
W
o
0::
::l
o
11l
Cl
c:
E:!~::!~~~~;:
cn,!.~,!.~,.!.,!.,!.o
.5:!~~~:!2:!~
~~~~~~~~~
ggggggggg
:i~~~~~~2~
MMMMMC")MM
MMMMMMMM
'"
'"
00
00
00
00
00
"''''
'"
00
00
00
uiui
..........
......
'"
00
00
00
00
'" '"
......
'"
;::-;:-OOOOU;-WOOOOM
(0..-0000,.....,...0000<.0
~cooooo,....,....oaoa,....
~,..:NtrilliciciM,..:lfiocicicD
B ~~~se~~~~~~:E~
~ r:r- ----- ~
'" '"
0' 0'000
. 0 . 0000
M 0 000 0
... 0 ooci 0
N 0 mLOO~
0 !!l. ~-lt)<'1
'"
'" ...
0' 0
0 0
'" 0 0
... 0 0
... 0 0
... !!l. '"
0
N
... ...
0' 0
. 0 0
..... 0 0
..... ui ui
.:. ..... .....
..... :'!- ...
0
N
'" ...
0' 0
. 0 0
0 0 0
..... 0 0
m '" '"
0 :'!- ...
0
N
'" '"
~;:-OOOOinIDO M
on <0..-0000,.........0 to
-", "l:tcooooa.....,.....o ...
CJo ,..:,..:ttiuiciori"':ui 0
Cll .
'2" ~ C:O"l:tN,...CQlOCOU1tt)
-~s--~~~~ ....
0.0
~~
Cllu.
Z
'" ...
Cll Cll
E on
'" c: '"
Z g ~
~ ~ 'en Q> ~ ~
'o'~ c: .~ co ,2,2
....0.. QJ :i. QJ rom
Q.~.~~ -0 ~:ffigg
'>~~.2:-ffi a.3:Q)Q) oX
CD"t:a.C...J I- E~a::a:: ro
a..:JQ):JCQ)<(.--t:~ Q..(/)
~~a::~g~-c~~~ ~~
&. fD-E~~m~ e >->--c~:J
(!) 3: ~ ~ Q) m ~ U5 -g -g ~ g,;J
co-g(j) >-g.~::5 2 2 c)c'-
8~.r5~~~g~~c3~g
11l
W
11l
::l
Cl
.~ oo~ooooooooo
... ~~ ,~~~~~~,....oo
CJ)cbcbCDcb..!-NMMMMJJtb
Cl1111~~~~~~~~
.soo~ooooooooo
c~~U}~~~~~~fflfg~
5tbJ,~tbJ,tbJJtbtbtbtbtb
S~~~~~~~:2~~}2}2
_ lOlO ,1OlOlOlOlOlOU')1J')1O
......,.!.~~,.!.,.!.,.!.,.!.,.!.,.!.,.!.,.!.,.!.
MMMMMMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMMMM
co
o
o
~
~
...
...
N
It>
It>
It>
M
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
~...
......
"'co
"'. co
co...
~tO '0
COM
!i
'" '"
o
9
'"
to
a
'"
It>
of,
It>
It>
If
M
M
'C
c:
::>
II.
i:'
'"
is.
]j
"a.
'"
u
m
Cll
>-
It>
o
Z
:J
LL
ZI-
~O
-JW
~o....,
01-0
et:ffig:
O:E-J
-Jw~
LL>I-
~ 0-
et:et:~
~0..0
~:EI-
~-Z
w-Jw
c)~:E
Ot::w
wo..O
LL ~ ~
OO-J
> et: fh
I- ~ et:
_w
o ~~
W-J
>~
u:~
W
Z
W
et:
000(")000..-
o I.() 1'-0 0 0(")
01.() (")0000>
.!! 0 C'i r-: 0 0 0 0
l'I:Il.()..-OOI.()I.()..-CD
o O>I'-'\;f"N..-1.()
t- N cri ...: o:i
..- ..- (")
ffi
M
"""
I
N
"""
o
N
o
o
'0.. I
o
o
I.()
CD
o
o
'q
o
o
I.tl
CD
ffi
N
....
I
"""
"""
o
N
o
o
'0 '
o
o
I.tl
I'-
o
o
, O.
o
o
I.().
I'-
ffi
....
....
I
o
....
o
N
o
o
'0'
o
o
I.()
'\;f"
00
00
'00
00
1'-1'-
01.()
OON
..-
ffi
o
....
I
en
o
o
N
'00
00
O. q ,
00
(") 0
..- I'-
N
00
00
I o. o.
00
'\;f"1'-
000
C'iL6
ffi
III
U~
I>> I
..... ClO
eo
0..0
~~
I>>LL
Z ffi
000(")00
o I.() 1'-0 0
q I.tl ("). a. q
0(")1'-00
1.()00001.()1.()
I'-I.()'\;f"N
..-
(")
, 0>.
o
N
..-
00
Q)
:::l
C
Q)
"E "E a> Q)
Q) Q) 0::: :::l
I>> ~ ~o ffi
E .9..9.cft. ~
~ ~ ~'g,~S:
I>> oO:E:a;ill
::l .....:u ~ .C >-
; .$!~Q)a.Q)en
> ooroQ)a.O.....W
I>> 0l5:(/)0 0.20
et:!: E E E a.:::let:
c <(LL:J
roeee~--O
w::::::ro-gen
-~~~a;"O-J
:goo 00 C/).C C ~
.....ccca.:::ll-
.$!rororoo'Eo
c~~~Q::J1-
o
w
o
et:
:J
o
o
CIa
c ..-
"i: I
...0
0";'"
CI"-
C CD
..'7
C 0
::l 0
o 0
u 0
u '
~~
'\;f"
N(")ON
~~";'"";'"
'\;f"'\;f"CDO
00'\;f"0>
I I I I
~,....,....O>
00 00 00 00
(")(")(")(")
I I , I
0000
0000
0000
0000
I I I I
'\;f"'\;f"'\;f"'<t
'\;f"'<t'<t'<t
'\;f"'<t'<t'<t
ffi
ffi
ffi
ffi
ffi
N
ffi
en
w
en
:J
III
ii
...
0
I-
M
....
I
N
....
0
N
N
"""
I
....
"""
0
N
"""
"""
I
0
....
0
N
0
....
I
en
0
0
N
III
-en
~o
'0'=
~O
0..0
~~
I>>LL
Z
I>>
E
l'I:I
Z
...
U
I>>
.-
0
~
0..
C)
C
'0:
...
0
CI
C
..
C
::l
0
U
U
~
;:--ooooooooooSooo~
(")00000000000000(")
O>OOO'\;f"OOCDOOOOOOOQ)
0000"':000500000000
..-OONOO 00'\;f" '\;f" (")(")0 I.() 0 I.() CD
NNN..-..-..-..----..-OOOO(")I.()
~---N-- -cD en u-i Lri-.:i
- - --,.... ('t')
-
ffi ffi
ffi
ffi
ffi
ffi
---
o
o
'a
o
o
o.
~
---
o
o
'a
o
o
I.tl
e
ffi
---
o
o
'q
o
o
I.().
t:..
o
o
, a.
o
o
I.().
t:..
ffi
o
o
'q
o
t:..
ffi
-
o
o
'q
o
::!.
---
000
000
'000
000
(") 0 I.()
..- 0 (")
-~-
---
00
00
00
00
I.() I'-
(")00
-L6
-
ffi
~ooooooooo
(")000000000
O>OOO'\;f"OOCDOO'
0000"':000500
..-OONOOI'-'\;f"'\;f"(")
'"'!.~~SSS----
..-
-
-
..-
(")
, Q)
o
N
..-
ffi
c
o
:;:::
U
:::l
- .....
C -
Q) 00
E 5
~ 0
ro ~
~Ci.. c
Q)0l Ol
cri ~ c .iij
..- ro'c ll.. Q) ..-
.2:=I-OOlC
00._ a.> ro co
-r-CO=>a>:;::;:;::;
r-: U; (/) 5: ~ .~ -ffi
"O:UCQ)ll...s:::
.!!2 ~ iii Q) .~ Q) .-
ai.....~~~c=
:> 0 Q) U 0;;::
.:: iii U; (/) ~ .g g
o::::uroroW.!!lQ)
<(<(5:al(/)OO:::
N
V7
(")
..-
..... w
o "E
c 'iij - Q)E
o c c
:;::: Q)roQ)
ro xo:>
Ci5 W e
00 ll.. a. .!: ffi a.
Q)I-E roEE
C5::::l"E~_"O
:.:J5:ll..Q).....roQ)
:u 00 ~ E .$! ~ .5
-.....~Q)rol-ro
~oc~5::uTI
c>~roCi.."O-Q)
roo Q)1-Q)Q)roo:::
o:~ o.~~ E ~ ro
EOEro.o~U;~CI)
OlCOOrouro<(W
~Q)oCi5~&5:Q)CI)
00 E ll.. c 0::: c 0 .~ :J
Q)~I""'ll..""'<.9~-J
:erol.().$!I-.$!~Q)<(
'BCi..~:g5::gI.()~b
~&~5:5:5:N(/)t-
N
00
..- ..-
, ,
'\;f"'\;f"
CD~
00
00 00
I.() I.()
, ,
I.() I.()
I.() I.()
I.() I.()
I.() I.()
, ,
'<t'<t
'<t'<t
'<t'\;f"
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..-
, , , , , I I , , I , I I
'\;f" '\;f" '<t '\;f" '<t '<t '<t '<t'\;f" '<t '\;f" '\;f" '\;f"
~ ~ ~ ~ CD ~ CD ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.()
I , , , I , I , I I I , ,
I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.()
I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.()
I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() lC) lC) I.() I.() I.()
I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() I.() lC) lC) I.() I.() I.()
, , I I I I I , I I I I I
'\;f" '\;f" '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t ~'<t'<t '<t '\;f" '\;f"
'<t '\;f" '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '\;f"'\;f" '<t '<t '<t
'\;f" '\;f" '<t '<t '<t '<t '\;f" '<t'<t'<t '<t '<t '<t
c
Z
z::l
:3::
<( ll. 0
cl-W
-z'"
O:Wo
0~0:
...JWll.
LL>...J
.0<(
0:0:1-
~ll.1i:
<(~<(
;:-0
W~~
"1-_
C-...J
Wll.-
<(I-
LLO::l
00:0:
~<(W
_W~
0>;';:
W~
~o:
LLO
I-
en
III
~
0
?-
M
.....
I
N
.....
0
N
N
.....
,
.....
.....
0
N
.....
.....
I
0
.....
0
N
0
.....
a.
0
0
N
III
'0 en
,~q
OClO
...0
ll.0
~~
OlLL
Z
Ol
E
III
Z
Ol
:J
c:
Ol
>
Ol
0:
Cl
c:
';::
..
U)
Cl
c:
..
c::
:J
0
U
U
<
U)
W
o
0:
::l
o
U)
0000
o Ii') o Ii')
0......0......
oCLiari"':
OJ.-O)O)
NC")
w
00
00
'00
00
.- .-
NN
w
00
00
'~~
00
C") C")
w
00
00
'~~
00
C") C")
w
00
00
'00
arill'i
NN
w w
00 0
o Ii') Ii')
0...... ' .......
oeD (0
OJ.- 0)
w w
Q)
ro Q)
a: ~
Q) Q)
CIl >
c: Q)
Q)1l::
u ro
:.J Q)
c:>-
"Eg~ffl
COOl::lO
,'r, ~ "5 0:
v...LL::l
~~-O
CO;;;;alU)
..c:u..."tl...J
U) c: c: <(
ii5CO::l1-
0'61:0
UC:=>I-
.- .-
00
rhcb
C") C")
...i-.J.
C") C")
C") C")
00
00
00
00
cOcO
~~
w
III
ia
..
0
?-
M
.....
I
N
.....
0
N
N
....
I
....
....
0
N
....
.....
I
0
....
0
N
0
....
.
en
0
0
N
III
.. en
u OlO
.'0 cO
...0
ll. 0
~ N
>-
OlLL
Z
Ol
E
III
Z
..
U
Ol
'0'
...
ll.
Cl
c:
';::
..
U)
Cl
c::
..
c::
:J
0
U
u
<l:
o
o
.;,
(0
ci
OJ
Ii')
,
Ii')
Ii')
Ii')
Ii')
r1>
'<t
'<t
"tl
c:
::l
LL
c:
CO
0.
19
'a'
CO
u
...
CO
Q)
>.
Ii')
000'
o Ii') Ii')
....... ......
o . _
0(0.....
00)0)
ari C")
0)
~
OJ
o
o
~
~
.-
.....
w
w
5' 0
o 0
ci I 0
o 0
~ .....
o N
.....
~
w
w
w
a 0
d'~
o 0
o ~
o
~
w
w
w
5' 0
o 0
ci I a
o 0
~ ~
o
~
w
w
w
a 0
o 0
ci . 0
o ari
o N
ll'i
~
w w
00
Ii') Ii')
'............
CLiCLi
O)~
.....
-
o
w w
c:
o
Ui
:;
-a
.0
::l
CIl
"tl
o
o
::
:!2
~
CIl U
Q) Q)
o.,~
- 0
0....
010-
c: CIl
~~(I)
XOW
Q)..c:en
01 U) ::l
S E...J
C:Q)<l:
-=-1-
g~o
U)WI-
U)
W
en
=>
00
0.-
..nM
(0(0
cici
OJ OJ
Ii') Ii')
J,~
Ii') Ii')
Ii') Ii')
Ii') Ii')
web
'<t'<t
'<t'<t
City of Edgewater
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
EFFECTIVE MARCH 2002 TBD
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
CWJYfER IX C~\PITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTR 0 D U CTI ON ..................................................... ....... ....................................................... 1
A. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS INVENTORy.................................................................. 2
1. Needs Derived from Other Elements............................................................................ 2
2. Existing Financial Resources ........................................................................................5
B. FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS AND LOANS ......................................................... 12
C. LOCAL POLICIES AND PRACTICES ........................................................................... 15
D. FINANCIAL ANALySIS........................ ... ........... .............................. .................. ....... ..... 20
E. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES .......................................................................31
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
A. PUBLIC FACILITIES, CAPACITIES AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE INVENTORY
FOR CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT .......................................................................1
1. T ransporta tion ............................................................................................................... 1
2. Sanitary Sewer................................................................................................................ 1
3. Potable Water ........... .............. ................... .................. ............................... ............... ..... 1
4. Solid Was te Disposal.... ......................... .............. ........................................ .................. 2
5. Stormwa ter Drainage..................................................................................................... 2
6. Recreation And Open Space ............... .......... ........ ............................ ............................. 2
B. CONCURRENCY ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................3
1. Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, and Potable Water Facilities ...........................3
2. Parks and Recreation Facilities .....................................................................................4
3. Transportation Facilities ....... ........... ..... ................. ....................... ... .............. ...............4
IX-i
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
C. GENERAL RULES FOR CONCURRENCY ASSESSMENT .........................................5
1. Existing Deficiencies.................................................................. ................................... 5
2. Approved Impacts............................................. ............................................................. 5
3. Phasing.................. .......................... ................. ...................... ....................................... 6
4. Time Specific Approval . .......................... ............................... ................ ....... ................ 6
5. Additional Information.................................................................................................. 6
6. Trans portation ............................................................................................................... 6
7. Sanitary Sewer ............. .............................. .............................................. ............. ..... ..... 6
8. Potable Water ...................... ........................ ................................ .............. ..................... 7
9. Solid Was te............................ ......................................................................................... 7
10. Stormwater Drainage ..... .............................. ............................................. ..... ........... ..... 7
11. Recreation........................... ........................................................................................... 7
D. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES ......................................................................... 9
LIST OF TABLES
Table I - Capital Improvements Schedule
Table 2 - Volusia County School District Five Year Work Program
Table 3 - Revenue Projections Affecting Capital Improvements
Table 4 - Expenditure Projection for Scheduled Capital Improvements
Table 5 - Debt Service Expenditure Projections
Table 6 - Annual Operating Expenditures
Table 7 - Fiscal Assessment No.1
Table 8 - Fiscal Assessment No.2
Table 9 - Five Year Schedule of Improvements
Table CM-l-Level of Service Standards
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure I - Federal Grant Agencies and Program Titles
LIST OF MfAPS
Map IX I General Location of Capital Impro';ements
IX-ii
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) is to evaluate the need for public facilities
as identified in other Elements of this Plan. In addition, the Capital Improvements Element will
present an analysis of the fiscal capability of the City to fund needed public facilities, recommend
financial policies to guide the funding of those identified improvements, and to schedule the funding
and construction of improvements in a manner necessary to ensure that capital improvements are
provided when required.
Needed capital improvements are those which are necessary to meet the adopted level of service
standards identified in other elements of this Plan. The City of Edgewater public facilities which
require identification and funding are:
· Transportation - Roadways which are under the jurisdiction of the City, and those roadways
which the City wishes to aid in funding improvements.
· Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element - Sanitary sewer treatment and effluent disposal facilities
necessary to serve the existing and future population of the City. In addition,
recommendations for capital improvements and policies to ensure adequate sanitary sewer
collection facilities.
· Solid Waste-Sub Element - Solid waste disposal facilities to service the City's existing and
future population, coordination with V olusia County to ensure those facilities are available
when needed, and recommendations for adequate solid waste collection methods.
· Drainage Sub-Element - Drainage systems necessary to meet recommended level of service
standards for stormwater quality and conveyance and coordination with V olusia County for
improvements to systems in basins which serve the City but are outside its jurisdiction.
· Potable Water Sub - Element - Potable water treatment facilities necessary to service the
existing and future population of the City. In addition, recommendations for capital
improvements and policies to ensure adequate potable water delivery facilities.
· Recreation/Open Space Element - Recreation facilities and land areas necessary to meet the
recommended level of service standards.
The capital improvements element will also present methods to ensure "concurrency" as defined
and required in Chapter 9J-5.003 and 9J-5.016, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The Element
will also present methods to monitor the "concurrency management system" as defined and
required in Chapter 9J-5.003 and 9J-5.0055, F.A.C.
IX-l
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
A. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS INVENTORY
1. Needs Derived from Other Elements
The analysis documented in the preceding comprehensive plan elements have identified facility
improvements needed to meet the existing service deficiencies and those needed to meet the
demands of future growth.
The geographic service areas and locations were identified for major public education and public
health system components. System components whose service areas include the City of Edgewater
are identified in the list in Table 1. The public education system is operated by the Volusia County
School Board, and the public health systems are operated by the V olusia County Health
Department.
The V olusia County School Board presently bases its needs assessments on the findings of the
Educational JlkJn Plant Suroey, prepared every five years by the State Department of Education in
accordance with Florida Statutes. The last survey was completed in latc 1999 April 2008. The
results of this survey indicated a need for a new middle school k-8 school to be built in the City of
Edgewater. The School Board, based on this report, has acquired a site for this facility along S.R.
442 in the southwestern section of the City, which is expectcd to begin de7clopment in
approximately fi-.rc (5) years anticipated to open August 2014. Indian River Elementary School will
be adding eleven (11) proposed classrooms to it's location. The remainder of the existing
educational facilities were noted as being in excellent or good condition and were adequately served
by roadways, sanitary sewer, solid waste, stormwater drainage, potable water and recreation facilities.
The State Department of Children and Families (DCF) determines the need for new health care
facilities with a formula based on occupancy rates, historic use by age group, and population
projections by age group. Although Edgewater currently has no full-service hospitals, there is Bert
Fish Medical Center located just outside the corporate City limits that serves the Edgewater area.
Based on growth forecasts a hospital will not be needed before 2020. Halifax Hospice currently has
under construction. a 12-bed patient care facility located at 4140 S. Ridgewood Avenue in
Edgewater.
Individual capital improvement needs identified in this element are, for the most part, those
improvements, which cost $25,000 or more and are generally non-recurring purchase items. The
capital improvements identified in the other elements of this Comprehensive Plan are listed with a
brief description in Table 1 along with their estimated costs and projected year of expenditure. The
improvements are listed by type of service, related to the various elements of the Comprehensive
Plan. As required by Section 9J-5.016, F.A.C., the Capital Improvements Element addresses existing
and future capital improvements needed for at least the first five fiscal years after the adoption of
the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, Table 1 lists improvements identified for the years 2001 2006
2009- 2013. Funding sources for these capital improvements are listed in Table 9. Table 2 identifies
the Volusia County School District Five-Year Work Program which must be referenced within in
City's CIE per the Public Schools Facility Element.
IX-2
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
CENERAL:
New City Hall $ Soo,9OO $ 2,900,900 $ 2,Soo,9OO
Ceneml ToMI3 $ Soo,9OO $ 2,llOO,llOO $ 2,SOO,9OO
PUBLIC s....t!<; I Yl (FiRlRe3eue)
$ 238, 703 $ 2liO,837 $ 199,S10
All; l'.llllamtus at neVI statien $ 200,llOO $ 190,900 $ 390,900
~... $ 32,100 $ 32,100
Replaee Mililary Brush Truck $ 81,113 $ 81,113
. . $ 29,70S $ 29,705
nuL" - , $ $ 238,703 $ 2li2,IOS $ 271,113 $ 2liO,837 $ 1,03li,058
DlV.INACEI
Conduet City '}lide SloRII.....lIter Management System Analysis
amI ImIlRlVement Study $ J 20,000 $ 120,000
Imlllemenlation of imllRl'lements in SlORIIWBter MBSler Plan
$ 7S,OOO $ 7S,llOO $ 7S,ooO $ 7S,OGO $ 3GO,OOO
Conduet imllRl'/ements te CarneFily System Choflnel C2 $ 180,000 $ I gO,Ooo $ 3liO,9OO
,,-' .-., _. $ S,OOO $ 5,llOO $ S,OOO $ S,9OO $ S,9OO $ 25,000
Maintain existing slRleltire in 18th St. Channel B1 $ S,OOO $ S,9OO $ S,OOO $ S,ooO $ S,GOO $ 2S,9OO
", .n.. _. $ S,GGG $ S,llOO $ S,GGO $ S,llOO $ S,OOO $ 2S,ooO
- $ J35,GOO $ 90,llOO $ 90,900 $ 270,900 $ 270,OOG $ gSS,9OO
SANITARY SEYlER,
$ 2,GOO,Ooo $ 2,llOO,OOO
\Vestem Service :\rea Colleetien & TfBnsmission System
$ 77S,OOO $ 77S,llOO
Conduet existing gFB'/il)' seHer s:I'fitem FepOiFS $ J 00,000 $ J 00,000 $ J oo,llOO $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ SOO,GOO
$ J 00,000 $ 2,87S,GGG $ 100,llOO $ 100,llOO $ J OG,GOO $ 3,27S,9OO
POTABLE Wf.TERI
New Wells $ 350,llOO $ 3S0,9OO
SR 112 '.Voler System Ujlgmde $ 7SG,OOG $ 7SG,OOG
SOlJlhem service area ground stofBge tank $ Soo,GOO $ Soo,llOO
Patable Water Tatal $ 7SG,OOO $ $ 35G,GOO $ SOO,llOO $ $ l,lioo,llOO
Pf.RKS& RECREATION.
Construet BaseealllSoftballlioldsiHa'vlEs Park $ SIlO,IlOO $ Soo,GOO
Construe! CORsoNation oreal Ha'.'Ats Park $ 2S,OOG $ 2S,llOO
Cons!FUet .\mllllilhealer $ 1S,Goo $ 1 S,GOO
Reno'/lIle and eonstFUet soeeer eomlllex $ 7S,GOG $ 7S,OOG $ 150,llOO
Purellase laRd for Ilark $ 15G,OOO $ 150,OOG
~ $ 2SG,OOG $ 2S0,llOO
Pllrehase land for nature Ilarl. $ 100,000 $ 10O,OOG $ J SO,llOO $ 3SG,OOO
$ 200,GOO $ 200,llOO
$ 37S,GOO $ 37S,GOO $ 7SG,GOO
Additional boat fBmllS Memard May Pork $ I SO,900 $ I SO,llOO
Parl15llRd Reerulian Tolal3 $ I,J2G,GOO $ 125,900 $ 22S,llOO $ 37S,ooG $ 72S,900 $ 2,870,llOO
All Projeel3 Totals $ 2,105.000 $ J,(j28,703 S 1,027,105 S 1~19.HJ S 1)55,8J7 S 9,liJ(j,OSS
TABLE 1
Ci~' of Edgewater
Capital Improvement Sekedule
Fiseal YeafS Eat:Jing 2002 2006
Souree: City ofBage ..,oler PlanRing Dh'isioA, 2GGJ
IX-3
Table 1
City of Edgewater
Capital Improvement Schedule
Fiscal Years Ending 2009-2013
Project Fiscal Year TOlal
2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 20ll-2012 2012-2013
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Vehicle ReDlacement S206 000.00 S300 000.00 5350000.00 5200.000.00 Sl 056.000.00
12 Lead/ EKG Monitor S25.00n.00 525.000.00
Genisis Extrication Tool Sv<tem S30.000.00 S30 000.00
Self Contained Bre<lther Annarahls 5100.000.00 5100 000.00
Fire DeDt. Totals 5206.000.00 $300.000.00 5350.000.00 $30.000.00 5325.000.00 $1.211.000.00
POLICE DEPARTMENT:
Vehicle Renlacement $103616.00 $112000.00 S84.000.00 S56 000.00 5112000.00 S467.616.00
Police Station Land Acouisition S80.000.00 S80.000.00
Radio System Renlacl'mpnt 5200 000.00 5200000.00
Police Dent. Totals $183,616.00 $312,000.00 $84,000.00 $56,000.00 $112,000.00 $747,616.00
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES:
Vehicle Renlacement 5209750.00 $41 n.ooo.OO S770.0nO.00 5620 000.00 S750000.00 52759750.00
Wastewater SliD linim. S200.000.00 5200 000.00
Bar Screen WWfP 5120000.00 S120 000.00
'SE Service Area DesUm & Construction 5101 400.00 S2 000 000.00 52 101 400.00
Retrofit Lift Station1. 2 13 S70.000.00 S40.000.00 S7000n.00 S180000.00
(2) 25 HP Comnressor< WWfP 530.000.00 530.000.00
Western StoralTC Tank & Pumo Station 5130.000.00 S I.W 000.00
wwrp Rehah/Renlacement S3 000 000.00 53.000000.00 56.000.000.00
2.5 MGD Wastewater Treatment Plant 51.000.000.no 57.500.000.00 56.500.000.00 515.000.000.00
SE Service Area Reclaimed Imorovements 5350.000.00 55.000.000.00 55.350.000.00
ART wells 17 181920 51210931.00 51.210931.00
Aerator and stairway renlacement 5200000.00 5200 000.00
rlaricone Paintinl> 5100000.00 5100000.00
Rpn!acement of 2" Water Lines 540.000.00 540 000.00
Western Reclaimed Water Main Extension 5350 000.00 53 500 000.00 53 850000.00
Slinlininl> pxisitnl> nine<-Wtldwood Subdivision 525 000.00 53000n.00 S30 000.00 S210 000.00 5295.000.00
Eastern Shores Project 596 750.00 596.750.00
Environmental Services Totals $2.378.831.00 $6.305.000.00 $13.370.000.00 58.150.000.00 $7.460.000.00 537 .663.831.00
LEISURE SERVICES:
Vehicle Renlacement 525.000.00 568 000.00 530 000.00 5148000.00 5271 000.00
Animal Shelter 5250000.00 5250000.00
Hawk< Park Amnitheatre 5183.175.00 5183.175.00
Kennedv Park Rpnnovations 5255 000.00 S290000.00 5545ono.00
DOl> Park 550.000.00 550000.00
Manl>o Lake Park 5500 000.00 5500000.00
Harner Liauid Coiled Dewees Slone Mower 525000.00 lli.QQQ
Parks and Recreation Totals $688.175.00 $50.000.00 $68.000.00 $30.000.00 $988.000.00 $1.824.175
PUBLIC WORKS:
Vehicle Reolacement 565 000.00 $65.000.00
Fleet Fuel Tank Renlacement 5125000.00 S 125.000.00
30th Street Sidewalk 5157716.00 5157716.00
Road Renavinl> 5335 272.00 5450 000.00 5475.000.00 5500000.00 5500000.00 52 260 272.00
Public Works Totals $617.988.00 $515.000.00 $475.000.00 $500.000.00 5500.000.00 $2.607.988.00
All Proiects Totals $4.074.610.00 $7 .482.000.00 $14.347 .000.00 58.766.000.00 $9.385.000.00 $44.054.610.00
Source: City of Edgewater Planning Division, 2008.
Table 2 I
2009-2013 Volusia County School District Five-Year Work ProQram
New Construction 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
*Euclid Ave. All Ed-Replacement 300,000 3,500,000 350,000
*Marks, GeorQe Elm-Replacement School 1,580,000 22,300,000
New Elm "A" Relieve Cypress Creek, Horizon, Chisolm 1,210,000
*New Elm "Z" Relieve GeorQe Marks, Woodward, Starke 19,040,000 1,890,000
New Elm "C" Relieve Pathways, Pine Trail 1,210,000
New Elm "D" Relieve Timbercrest, Vol usia Pines, Deltona lakes 22,000,000 2,400,000
New Elm "F" Relieve OranQe City, Manatee Cove, Debary 2,100,000
*New K-8 "FF" Relieve New Smyma Mid, Indian River, Edgewater 1,800,000 39,500,000
New Mid "HH" Relieve Heritage, Galaxy 1,800,000
*Ormond Beach Mid-Master Plan Phase II 24,870,000 2,000,000
Total New Construction 21,440,000 30,260,000 27,730,000 4,200,000 64,220,000
MaTor Pro"ects at Existing Schools and Facilities
*Chisolm Elm- Additions/Remodeling 2,500,000 400,000
Deltona HS-Reroof Campus 2,880,000
Deltona lakes Elm- Chiller System Bid 8 & 9 922,000
Discovery Elm-HV AC 4,100,000
Enterprise Elm-Classroom Addition 7,000,000 500,000
Indian River Elm-Classroom Addition 3,238,000 180,000
New Smvma Bch Mid- Doors, Restrooms 610,000
Pine Ridae HS-HVAC Bldg 5 150,000 1,500,000
Pine Trail Elm- HV AC 5,200,000
Portables-lease 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 900,000 800,000
Portables- Move and Compliance 714,000 690,000 640,000 590,000 540,000
Sea breeze HS- Renovate Bldg 7 & Air System 1 st Floor 900,000
Southwestern Mid-Additions 500,000 5,000,000 500,000
Sunrise Elm-Classroom Addition 180,000 2,700,000 180,000
*Westside Elm-Additions 1,007,000 80,000
Various Schools-Minor Projects 1,200,000 1,300,000 1,400,000 1,500,000 1,600,000
Various Facilities-Facilities Review Projects 13,761,445 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000
Total Major Projects at Existing Schools and Facilities 27,175,445 28,150,000 21,120,000 19,497,000 13,520,000
I I
Facilities Manaaement
Facilities Management-Various Projects 3,650,289 3,759,798 3,872,592 3,988,770 4,108,433
Technoloav I
Network, EDP & Communications Equipment 9,692,350 12,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000
System Wide Equipment and Vehicles
Various Schools & Departments Furniture and Equipment 2,781,002 2,800,000 2,800,000 2,800,000 2,800,000
Total Equipment and Vehicles 2,781,002 2,800,000 2,800,000 2,800,000 2,800,000
Buses
Transportation Dept- Bus Replacement 1,150,722 3,548,028 5,088,615 6,566,572
Transfers
Transfers- Debt Service 51,637,254 53,408,170 53,411,985 53,410,211 56,280,590
Transfers-Eauipment leases & Property Insurance 3,262,350 662,350 662,350 662,350 662,350
Transfers-Maintenance 14,305,000 14,305,000 14,305,000 14,305,000 14,305,000
Totals 133,943,690 146,496,040 139,449,955 115,951,946 174,462,945
Source: Volusia County School District, Work Prooram Adopted 09/16/06 *=Proiects on aoproved Sales Tax list
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPIT ALIMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Each capital improvement project is described briefly in Table 1. In addition, the reason for the
project is identified and estimated total project cost is provided. For ease of review, the projects
have been grouped by facility type. As indicated, capital improvement projects have been identified
for general, public safety, sanitary sewer, potable water, drainage, parks and recreation, and
transportation facilities. It sh.ould be noted that the projects ift Table 2 include capital
improvements mentioned in the Infrastructure Elemcnt of thc City's CP which wcre not finalized at
thc time this clement was completed (September, 1988). These projects include the paving and
drainage improvements to be conducted ift the Florida Shores area, a wastewater Reuse Distribution
System for effluent disposal, Florida Shores Water System Impro'y'ements for fire protection, and
Western Water Treatment Plant/Wdlfidd Land Acquisition costs.
It should be noted that the capital improvement projects contained in Table 1 are not inclusive of all
the anticipated capital expenditures by the City during the planning period. Table 1 is limited only to
those major components identified by the preceding elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan
(CP) in order to analyze development impacts and trends at a level of detail which is both
manageable and fairly accurate.
The cost estimates for the capital improvements indicated in this element were developed using
standard engineering practice regarding construction costs, in conjunction with information derived
from actual construction costs of similar projects, certified bid documents on similar projects, and
engineering cost estimates conducted on similar projects.
2. Existing Financial Resources
The first step in planning capital improvements, as well as arranging the necessary financing through
the budgeting process, is to inventory the major sources of funding available to the City. These
major sources of funding are expected to contribute a total revenue sum of $ 8,553,327 $4.074.610
in fiscal year ~2009. The revenue sources listed below comprises a working inventory for which
the City's ability to fund the needed capital improvements will be assessed. In addition, the current
status of each revenue source currently used by the City is indicated. It is important to note that the
list below includes all of the major financial resources available to the City and is not limited to the
funds which will be used for the capital improvement projects identified in the 5-year Schedule of
Improvements included in this element. These currently utilized financial resources comprise, in
part, the revenue sources which will be used to fund the identified capital improvements projects.
IX-5
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
3. Local Revenue Sources
a. Property Taxes (Ad Valorem)
Property taxes are normally based on a millage rate (i.e. one mill equates to $1 per $1000 of
assessed value, or .1 %) which is then applied to the taxable value of all real property, as well as all
other tangible personal property. The revenue from ad valorem taxes may be used_to fund both
operating costs and capital projects, unless prohibited by local policies. Provisions at the State
level exist for raising the millage rate above the 10-mill cap set by local referendum for debt
service or provision of municipal-type services within the City.
CURRENT STATUS: As the major source of revenue for the City of Edgewater, ad valorem
taxes normally account for approximately ~ 41 % of the City's annual budget for the General
Fund. The City's current millage rate for the General Revenue Fund is set at approximately 5:95
5.90 mills. The expected tax yield for fiscal year ~ 2009 is $2,527,588 $5.554.095 from a tax
base (adjusted taxable value) of $~ ~2,505,001 $980.595.906. A level of assessment of 96% is
currendy used by the City.
b. Public Utility or User Charges
The revenue from these charges is generated primarily as a result of the rates charged to City
residents of utilization of City-owned utilities such as water, sewer, drainage, and solid waste
removal/ disposal. Revenue from these operations include user fees, miscellaneous customer
service charges, and interest income.
CURRENT STATUS: The expected public utility revenue for fiscal year ~ 2009 is estimated
to be approximately $7,732,031 $12.728.185.
c. Other taxes, fees, and charges
This category of revenue source includes special assessments, various administrative fees, and
other charges for using services or facilities owned and operated by the City. Some examples of
these charges are public document sales, property appraisal fees, fines and forfeitures, permit and
license fees, City fund interest income, City property sale income, rental income, and all private
contributions (real estate, gifts, donations, etc) to the City.
CURRENT STATUS: Approximately ~ 22% of the City's General Fund revenues are
generated from these sources. In fiscal year 200+ 2009, the sum of $2,170,338 $3.039.733 is
expected to be generated by these fund sources.
IX-6
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
d. Franchise Fees
The City cUffently charges a franchise fee (based on the applicable gross re7enues charged) ror
utility selviees which arc provided by pn-/ate companies within the City. The utility service and
franchise fee ror each respective type of service arc: (i) Electric Service 6%; (if) Telephone
Service 1%; (ill) Solid Waste Collection Service 1%; (i-;) Natural Cas Service 6%; and (-;)
Cable Tele-.'ision Service 3%.
The City currently charges a franchise fee (based on the applicable gross revenues charged) for
utility services. which are provided by private companies within the City.
CURRENT STATUS: Approximately =1-:9 1% of the City's General Fund revenues are generated
from this source. For fiscal year ~ 2009, it is anticipated that $673,100 $1.003.256 in revenue
will be generated from this funding source.
e. Public Service or Utility Tax
A municipality may levy a tax on the purchase of electricity, metered or bottled gas, water, cable
television, and telecommunication services. The tax may be levied upon only the purchases
within the municipality and may not exceed ten (10) percent of the applicable payments received
by the seller of the taxable item from the purchaser of the purchase of such service.
CURRENT STATUS: The City currently charges a public service or utility tax on the previously
mentioned applicable and available utility services, with the exception of cable television services.
The City presently charges ten (10) percent of revenues for electricity, gas and water, and seven
(7) percent of revenues for telecommunications. For fiscal year ~ 2009, the City anticipates
receiving $1,397,000 $1.746.410 in public service or utility tax revenue, which amounts to
approximately -t43 13% of the estimated General Fund revenue.
f. Special Source of Revenue
Additional funding mechanisms are sometimes required due to the availability of existing revenue
sources and/or the project priorities assigned by the City Council. The options available to the
City regarding alternate sources of revenue for funding capital improvement projects are listed
below.
1) System Development of Impact fees. Fees which are charged in advance
of new development to pay for infrastructure needs, but not operating
costs, resulting directly from the new development. The fees must be
equitably allocated to the specific group(s) which directly benefit from
the capital improvements. In addition, the assessment levied must fairly
reflect the true cost of the capital improvements.
IX-7
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
CURRENT STATUS: The City currendy charges impact fees for water and wastewater services,
and for parks. Approximately $482,000 $40.000 in impact fee revenues (including interest
income on fund balances) are expected to be generated during fiscal year ~ 2009.
g. Special Assessment
Similar to impact fees, special assessments are charged to residents, agencies or areas who direcdy
benefit from the provision of a new service or facility by the City. For example, the construction
of a gravity sewer system for an existing neighborhood may be financed through a special
assessment to the neighborhood's individual homeowners rather than through a revenue fund of
the City. The requirement that all of the City's residents fund the new sewer system through a
City revenue source is not considered equitable.
CURRENT STATUS: The City currendy has two special assessments in the Florida Shores area,
one for sewer, and one for paving. The sewer assessment was started in November 1992 and
the paving assessment was started in November 1994. The long-term debt service associated
with the special assessment bonds is summarized below:
2004-
~
2003
2004-
2QGa
2009
General Stormwater SRF Water and Sewer Fund
$911,370 $376,813 $1,811,138
$911,370 $376,813 $1,811,138
$911,370 $376,813 $1,811,138
$911,370 $376,813 $1,811,138
$911,370 $376,813 $1,811,138
$911,370 $376,813 $1,811,138
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
$900.349
$900.349
$478.320
$387.835
$387.835
$164.641
$1.811.438
$1.811.438
$1.811.438
$1.811.438
$1.811.438
h. Borrowing
Occasionally, many local governments are required to resort to borrowing funds to pay for capital
improvements due to their extremely high cost. Usually, either long-term or short-term financing
is used to provide these funds. The short-term financing option is normally handled by local
banks and is used to raise the required revenue for periods of one to five years. The more
customary method is to authorize long-term bond issues, which range in length from five to
thirty years. Listed below are several types of bond issues available to the City.
IX-8
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
1) General Obligation Bonds. These are bonds which are backed by the
full faith and credit of the local government, and are required to be
approved by a voter referendum. Since these bonds are secured by the
taxing power of government, they generally offer lower interest rates
than other bonds. The revenues collected from ad valorem taxes on
real estate, as well as other sources of revenue are used to service the
government's debt. General obligation bonds should be used to fund
capital improvements which benefit the whole City rather than specific
areas or groups of citizens.
CURRENT STATUS: The City currendy has no outstanding general obligation bonds.
However, the City has $500,000 in outstanding general obligation notes.
2) Revenue Bonds. The revenue obtained from the issuance of these
bonds is normally used to finance publicly owned facilities such as
water treatment and wastewater treatment facilities. The charges
collected from the users of the facilities are used direcdy to retire the
bond obligations. This basically allows the capital project to be self-
supporting. It should be noted that the interest rates generally tend to
be higher than those of general obligation bonds. Also, the issuance of
the bonds may be approved by the City Council without a voter
referendum.
CURRENT STATUS: The City has issued several revenue bonds to fund the improvements to
its water and wastewater facilities. The bond revenues are deposited into Enterprise Trust Fund
accounts for each of the utilities, from which funds are specifically earmarked for a particular
project. User charges are then used to service the debt. The total annual debt service on these
bonds is as follows:
~-
~ 2009-
~2010-
~2011-
~ 2012-
~ 2013-
Total
$1,067,687
$1,066,813 $2.134.835
$1,068,262 $2.134.835
$1,068,328 $2.134.835
$1,068,060 $2.134.835
$1,068,060 $2.134.835
$6,407,210 $10.674.175
IX-9
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
3) Industrial Revenue Bonds. This type of bond, though issued by a local
government, is actually assumed by companies or industries which use
these funds to construct facilities. The low interest rates associated
with this type of bond (due to their tax exempt status) makes it
particularly attractive to industry. The advantages to the local
government is that the private sector is responsible for the retirement
of the debt and that the new employment opportunities are created in
the community.
CURRENT STATUS: The City has not issued any Industrial Revenue Bonds.
4. State Sources
The City of Edgewater also depends on annual disbursements from state government to supplement
its revenue sources. The revenue sources discussed above represent those funds generated by City
levies which may be collected and disbursed at the local level. The revenue sources discussed in this
section represent those funds which are: (1) generated locally, but collected and later reimbursed to
the City by the State; (2) adopted as a local option tax or license fee, collected and reimbursed by the
State; or (3) shared by the State in the form of grants to the local government, but originate from
State general revenues. The amounts available from these sources may vary widely from year to year
depending on legislative actions.
a. Revenue Sharing Trust Fund
This component of revenue consists of 1.075 percent of sales and use tax collections, 12.5
percent of the state alternative fuel use decal fee collections, and the remainder from the one-
cent municipal fuel tax. The sales and use tax collections were substituted for the cigarette tax
revenues that previously were used for this fund by the Florida Legislature. The municipal fuel
tax funds are restricted for transportation related expenditures.
CURRENT STATUS: The City anticipates receiving $~25,000 $369.000 from this revenue
source in the fiscal year ~ 2009. Of this revenue, 63.8% comes from the sales and use tax
collections, .4 percent comes from the user decal fee collections, and the remainder (35.8%) is
generated by the one-cent municipal fuel tax. This revenue source is anticipated to account for
approximately +.-9 J% of the City's General Fund revenues in fiscal year ~ 2009.
b. Other Shared Revenue
This category of revenue sources includes several major financial resources which, like the
Revenue Sharing Trust Fund, are shared between City, County, and State agencies.
The following taxes and licensing fees generate a large portion of the total annual revenue for
the City's General Fund.
IX-tO
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
1) Sales Tax - The current sales tax in the State is 6%, and is levied on
retail sales, and such things as commercial rentals, admission fees to
entertainment facilities, and motor vehicle sales. 9.718% (cffccti-;e July
1, 2000) of The collection is returned to the Cities and Counties in
accordance with specific formulae. The variables of the formulae, in
the case of cities, include the population of the municipality, as well as
the total and unincorporated population of the County.
CURRENT STATUS: The City's portion of the State sales tax is expected to amount to
approximately $850,000 $900.000 in fiscal year ~ 2009, which represents 9:-9 .2.% of the City's
General Fund revenue budget for that year.
c. Mobile Home Licenses
Mobile Home licenses currently range from ~$31.60 to $8G $86.60, depending on what time
length is established in the rate structure. Each City shares in the allocation of the revenues
form this source based on the number of units located in the City. . The City in turn shares a
portion of the revenue with the local school board. This has proven to be a relatively stable
revenue source over time.
CURRENT STATUS: The City's share of this revenue source estimated for fiscal year ~
2009 amounts to approximately $23,000 which represents less than 1 % of the General Fund
revenue budget.
d. Local Option Taxes
Currently, there are four (4) possible sources of revenue available to the City within this
category. All of the funds are generated locally, but the funds are collected and disbursed by the
Florida Department of Revenue. The City currently shares in only one (1) of these revenue
sources.
CURRENT STATUS: The City's share of this revenue source estimated for fiscal year ~
2009 is approximately $~23,000 $77.000 which amounts to 4:-9 1% of the City's ~ 2009
General Fund revenues.
e. Alcoholic Beverage License
The Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco for the State of Florida administers the
issuance of licenses associated with the sale and/or consumption of alcoholic beverages. The
State collects in excess of $37 million annually from this fee. Of this amount, a portion is
returned to counties and municipalities as a state shared revenue.
IX-11
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
CURRENT STATUS: The City's share of this revenue source is anticipated to amount to
approximately $9;{}00 $7,000 in fiscal year ~ 2009 which is less than 1 % of the City's General
Fund revenues.
f. Other Sources of Shared Revenues.
The City also receives other shared revenues from both the County and other government
agencies. These revenues include the Motor Fuel Tax Rebate, the Federal Excise Tax, and the
County Occupational Licensc fccs Business Tax Receipt fees.
CURRENT STATUS: The City's share of these revenues for the fiscal year ~ 2009 are
anticipated to amount to:
a. Motor Fuel Tax Rebate:
b. County Occupational Liccnsc Fees:
b. County Business Tax Receipt Fees:
$9-;900 $5.000
$21,000
$15.000
The sum of these revenue sources amounts to less than 1 % of the City's fiscal year ~ 2009
General Fund revenues.
B. FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS AND LOANS
The system by which federal general revenue sharing was formerly provided (U.S. State and Local
Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972) has been substantially modified. The federal funds are now available
through allocations to the state agencies which administer and monitor block grants or disbursed by
federal agencies as block grants directly to state and local agencies, as well as other eligible
organizations and individuals. The purpose of the block grants program is to allow recipients
greater freedom in the actual funds, though the funds must still be used for projects in specific
categories. Since these funds require the competitive applications be submitted in order to receive
an allocation, the grant monies are usually non-recurring and cannot accurately be projected for
annual budgeting purposes.
A partial list of available federal grant sources is shown in Figure 1. Other grants and loans are
administered at the state level, with state executive departments acting as "pass-through agencies"
for federally funded projects. The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) is an example of
a federally funded grant project. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
administers this program and allocates 70% of its CDBG funds to "entitlement communities", or
IX-12
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
the larger urban areas. These communities must apply for grants for financing specific projects
from a list of eligible activities outlined in Title I statutes. These projects include infrastructure
improvements, housing projects, and commercial revitalization. The remaining 30% of the grant
funds are allocated to state pass-through agencies such as the Department of Community Affairs
(DCA) in the State of Florida. DCA administers these grants for the same types of projects
mentioned previously, but restricts their availability to small cities and counties.
In addition to block grants, there are several direct loan programs available at the federal level, but
their applicability to capital projects is extremely limited. State loans however, are usually available
to finance capital projects such as land acquisition for low-income housing. DCA administers loans
and grants for these projects to eligible governments through its Bureau of Housing.
CURRENT STATUS: The City has received a loan from the Florida Department of
Environmental Regulation COER) under the State RCJ'OI-.ring Loan Program for funding
wastewater infrastructure impro-y'ements. The City has rcceived $25,809,128 in low interest
loans to fund wastewater treatment plant impro-;ements, collection facilities, and dechlorination
facilities.
i\dditionally, the City has received a grant from the FRD.AP in the amount of $150,000 for the
Edgewater Park Ballfield Expansion as well as a grant from HUD in the amount of $277,000 f-or
improvcments to upgrade the Southeast V olusia YMC}~ to a shelter.
Finally, in conjunction with the 1988 Solid Wa3te Management }let (SWMA), V 0lu3ia County
recci-.red a State grant for conducting and promoting a recycling program. The County allocated
a portion of these funds to each participating municipality based on population. The City's
portion of the Volusia County Recycling and Education Grant amounted to $6,905 f-or fiscal
year 2001.
The City has received a grant from the Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program
(FRDAP) in the amount of $200.000 for the Kennedy Park improvements as well as a grant
from Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in the amount of $87.461 for street repaving.
IX-13
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
FIGURE 1
FEDERAL GRANT AGENCIES AND PROGRAM TITLES
AGENCY
TITLE
Department of Commerce
Public Works and Development Facilities
Support for Planning Organizations
Public Works Impact Projects
Public Telecommunications Facilities
Construction and Planning
Department of Children & Families
Community Health Concerns
Department of Housing and Urban
Development
Housing Development Grants
Community Development Block
Grant/Entitlement
Community Development Block
Grant/Small Cities Program
Department of Interior
Outdoor Recreation: Acquisition,
Development, and Planning
Urban Park and Recreation and Recovery
Program
Department of Transportation
Urban Mass Transportation Capital
Improvement Grants
Urban Mass Transportation Technical
Studies Grant
Environmental Protection
Agency
State Revolving Loan Fund CD FR) Program
Comprehensive Estuarine Management
SOURCE: "Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance", Government Printing office, Washington,
D.C.
IX-14
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
C. LOCAL POLICIES AND PRACTICES
To guide the location and timing of land development, local policies and practices are used,
particularly in support of the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Element.
Obviously, state agencies and water management districts which provide public facilities within the
City's jurisdiction may influence these policies and practices. One such influence was found to be
generated by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDO'!) S-year Transportation Plan. This
influence stemmed from the fact that several roadways within the City's jurisdiction are part of the
state highway system, and therefore are largely the financial responsibility of the FDOT. Plans for
the improvement of some of these roadways may be included in the before mentioned S-year
Transportation Plan. However, there are other such roadways not included in the plan. Either
scenario affects the capacity of the roadways, which in turn affects the level and intensity of
development, as well as the degree of financial commitment for which the City must plan.
In the absence of improvement plans by FDOT, special provisions may be made when the City
desires improvement of a state road to maintain local levels of service standards. These provisions
may include the City expending funds for roadway improvements or providing FDOT with the
funds, either of which may be collected through an impact fee.
In this section, many of the local practices and policies used by the City are described in terms of
their general concept and the circumstances surrounding their use. The policies and practices both
used in the past and currently in use are identified. Policies and practices not in use which have the
potential for being used by the City are discussed in a later section of the CIE.
1. Level of Service Standards.
Level of Service (LOS) standards indicate the degree of service provided, or proposed to be
provided by public facilities based on their operational characteristics. Basically, the LOS indicates
the capacity per unit of demand for each public facility. Therefore, the LOS is a summary of the
existing or desired public facility conditions. Chapter 163, F.S., and Chapter 9J-S, F.A.C., both
require LOS standards to be included for all public facilities addressed by local governments in their
CPo These LOS standards are to be established for the specific purpose of issuing permits or
development orders to ensure that adequate capacity is available and will be maintained in public
facilities for future development.
LOS standards can effect both the timing and location of development by encouraging development
of those areas which have public facilities with excess capacity. In addition, development is not
allowed unless the needed facilities and services are available. This development and provision of
services usually occur in a phased sequence over a period of time.
IX-1S
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
CURRENT STATUS: The City has adopted formal LOS standards with the completion of
their CIP. Therefore, the LOS standards as outlined in the various elements of the CIP have
been listed below.
Sanitary Sewer: 95 gallofi3 pcr capita pcr day
204 gallons per equivalent residential unit per day
Solid Waste: 2.75 pounds per capita per day
Drainage: Level A - No significant street flooding
Level B - No major residential yard flooding
Level C - No significant structure flooding
Level D - No limitation on flooding
(Based on 25-year/24-hour storm event)
Potable Water: 100 gal:lofi3 pcr capita pcr day
204 gallons per equivalent residential unit per day
Collector Roadways: LOS D for peak hour volumes
Arterial Roadways: LOS D for peak hour volumes
Limited Access Road: LOS C
Public Transit Facilities ry olusia County): In process of establishing LOS standards
Recreation Standards for Facilities:
Facility
Parkland
Baseball/Softball
Basketball Court
Tennis Court
Handball/Racquetball Court
Community Center
Multi-Purpose/Soccer
Shuffle Board Court
Bocci Ball Court
Volley Ball Court
Boat Ramps
Bike/Pedestrian Trail
Fitness Trails
Activities Center
Gymnasium
Unit of Measure
5 acres/1 ,000 persons
1 field/ 4 ,000 persons
1 court/5,000 persons
1 court/3,500 persons
1 court/4,000 persons
1 facility / 30,000 persons
1 field/4,000 persons
1 court/1 ,500 persons
1 court/1 0,000 persons
1 court/5,000 persons
1 ramp/4,700 persons
1 mile/4,000 persons
1/14,000 persons
1/15,000 persons
N/A
IX-16
CITY OF EDGEWA TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
2. Capital Improvements Program (CIP)
A capital improvements program is a plan for capital expenditures to be incurred each year over
a fixed period of years to meet anticipated facility improvements and needs. The CIP identifies
each capital project or other capital expenditures anticipated by the City, as well as presenting
estimates of the resources needed to finance the project.
The CIP is designed to be consistent with the CIE of the local CP because it reflects the goals,
objectives, and policies of the element and its implementation strategy, including the 5-year
Schedule of Improvements. In addition, the CIP is not restricted to only those public facilities
addressed in the CP, as is the ClE.
The fust year of a CIP becomes the annual capital budget with longer range capital expenditures
identified for the 5-year program. The capital budget encompasses enacting appropriations for
those capital projects delineated for the first year of the CIP. The CIP, similar to CIE, is
reviewed on an annual basis.
CURRENT STATUS: The City is currently preparing a CIP with 5-year increments, within
which are contained annual capital budgets.
3. Impact Fees
Impact fees are imposed by many local governments on new developments to offset the costs of
new public facilities necessitated by the development. Local government may use this strategy as
one method of implementing the CIE. Chapter 163, F.S. includes impact fees as an innovative
technique that may be integrated into the land development regulations.
Impact fee development is a logical outgrowth of the CIE preparation. A rational basis for
developing an impact fee ordinance comes from the assessment of the local government's
capital improvement needs and its capability to provide for those needs which is required by
Chapter 9)-5, F.A.C.
Infill development location and timing may be affected and controlled through the use of impact
fees. This is because infill development usually occurs in those areas having capital facilities with
excess capacity. If the local government chooses not to recover the costs of capital facilities in
underutilized service areas, infill development may be encouraged by the absence of impact fees
on developments propos~d within those areas.
CURRENT STATUS: The City currently has impact fee ordinances fDr providing water,
wastewater and recreation services. Additionally, as of April 1, 2001 the City will require
impact f-ces for Fire afld Rescue services.
The City currently has impact fee ordinances resolutions for providing water. wastewater,
recreation. Fire and Police services.
IX-17
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
4. ~ Utility Service Areas
The delineation of ttfflaft utility service areas within a comprehensive plan or CIP may be used to
describe areas where local governments intend to provide public facilities and services. When
used in conjunction with a CIE and CIP, t:t:fflaft utility service areas can be used as a tool to
coordinate the timing of public facilities and service provision within areas planned for
development.
Additionally, the following benefits may be the result of using ttfflaft utility service areas:
a) Encourage efficient and orderly growth patterns;
b) Preserve agricultural and environmentally sensitive areas; and
c) Support control on facility extensions
CURRENT STATUS: ~ Utility service areas have been included in the Utilities
Element of the City's CP, but only for water and wastewater facilities and services.
5. User Charges and Connection Fees
User charges are designed to recover the costs of public facilities or services form those who
benefit from them. Many areas of local government employ the use of user charges. Monthly
sewer charges paying for the operation and maintenance of wastewater facilities as well as
retiring debt service on revenue bonds is a good example of user charge usage. This technique
may also be applied to transportation, potable water, solid waste, recreation, and parking
facilities and services.
These charges may be designed to vary, depending on the quantity and location of the services
rendered, in order to affect the pace and pattern of development. In other words, the greater
the distance from the service area, the higher the user charge.
CURRENT STATUS: User charges and connection fees are currently used for wastewater,
potable water, solid waste, and recreation facility maintenance.
6. Concurrency Management System.
This controls the timing and location of development by conditioning new development
approvals on evidence that sufficient facilities and services are present or will be provided in
order to maintain adopted LOS standards. In effect, this implements the 1985 Legislative
mandate (Chapter 163, F.S.) that requires public facilities to be available to support the impacts
of new development. Therefore, development approval becomes contingent on the ability of
IX-18
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
local governments to provide facilities and services, and furthermore, may require the
development itself to furnish the facilities and services in order to maintain the adopted LOS
standards. Additional benefits associated with a Concurrency Management System are as
follows:
a) Supports the consistency of the CIE with the Future Land Use
Element;
b) Provides for the orderly expansion of public facilities;
c) Stabilizes capital improvement expenditures and taxing structures for
capital improvements; and
d) Reduces the possibility of damage to the environment from the use
of overburdened facilities.
Typically, the Concurrency Management System interacts with the development approval process by
requiring that all zoning, subdivision, or planned unit development (PUD) approval be granted only
upon demonstrated compliance with the system. The building permit stage is another level at which
a Concurrency Management System may function. In this context, the Concurrency Management
System may control development in areas that are already approved, but not as yet built on, such as
pre-platted lands.
CURRENT STATUS: The City has developed a Concurrency Management System as part
of this element.
7. Mandatory Dedication or Fees in Lieu Of.
The City may require, as a condition to plat approval, that subdivision developers dedicate a portion
of the land within the development to be used for public purposes such as roads, parks, and schools.
Dedication may be made to the governing body, or to a private group such as a homeowners
association.
When a subdivision is of such small scale or topographic conditions that a land dedication cannot
reasonably be required, the City may require that the subdivider pay a fee in lieu of dedication which
is equivalent to the amount of land that otherwise would have been dedicated by the developer. The
fee may be deposited into a separate account for use in the future towards the provision of such
facilities.
As a result of the public facility provision, the adjacent area benefiting from the initiative would
likely become more attractive to development. Therefore, the acquired service potential may be
used to encourage growth in desired areas.
IX-19
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
CURRENT STATUS: The City currently requires mandatory dedications ofland or fees in
lieu of.
8. Moratoria.
A moratorium, or stop-gap ordinance, is used to temporarily halt or freeze development in an area
for a specified period of time on an emergency basis. The ordinance may be imposed on building
permits, development approvals, or governmental services such as potable water connections or
wastewater system extensions and! or connections. The moratorium normally is imposed for a
"reasonable time" to allow the necessary planning activities to take place pending comprehensive
plan preparation, adoption, or amendment. The State of Florida legal system has found
development moratoria to be a valid measure of last resort in the protection of local public health,
safety, and welfare when adopted in accordance with applicable procedures. Some other
considerations in adopting a moratorium include:
a) Determining legal status of existing permit applications and approvals
to determine the extent of "vested rights" for those developments
approved prior to ordinance adoption;
b) Specifying the geographic extent of the moratorium (whether it will
be City wide, or limited to specific hazard areas with existing service
insufficiencies); and
c) Specifying the time frame and conditions under which the
moratoriumwill be imposed.
CURRENT STATUS: The City is not currently imposing any moratoria.
D. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
FISCAL ASSESSMENT
In this section, an examination is made of the City's ability to fund the capital improvements listed
in Table 1. The purpose of the examination is to determine whether sufficient revenue will be
available using the existing budgeting framework utilized by the City to fund the required
improvements at the time when they are needed.
The assessment process estimates future revenue receipts which the City will use to fund capital
improvements, then balances these revenues against the anticipated capital improvement
IX-20
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
expenditures. Using this process, it becomes possible to quantify annual revenue surpluses and
shortfalls, thereby providing a basis for examining opportunities for financing the required capital
improvements. The examination of these opportunities is included in the next portion of this
section, entided "Summary and Recommendations".
In addition to the direct cost for capital improvements, this section will review the fiscal impacts of
the capital improvements identified in the other CP elements upon the actual operation of the City
departments responsible for facility management. This will include costs for additional personnel
and routing operation/ maintenance activities. It should be noted that this assessment includes only
those items planned for in other CP elements.
Accounting System
The accounting system employed by the City records financial transactions in individual accounts
called "funds". Records for each fund provide a complete accounting of fund assets, liabilities,
reserves, equities, revenues, and expenditures. The following is a brief description of the funds
which the City has established for capital improvement financing.
GENERAL FUND: The General Fund is the basic operating fund of the City. It accounts for all
revenues and expenditures used to finance the traditional services associated with a municipal
government which are not accounted for in other funds. These services include police and fire
protection, civil defense, emergency rescue services, street services, parks and recreation, building
safety, general administration and any other activity for which a specific special fund has not been
created.
ENTERPRISE FUND: Enterprise Funds are established to account for the financing of self-
supporting municipal activities which render services on a user charge basis to the general public. In
the City, the water and sewer utility, refuse collection and stormwater operations are operated as
enterprise activities.
The significant characteristic of an Enterprise Fund is that the accounting system makes it possible
to determine whether the activity is operated at a profit or loss. All reports of Enterprise Funds are
self-contained. In this way, creditors, legislators, and the general public can evaluate the
performance of the municipal enterprise on the same basis as investor-owned enterprise in the same
industry.
IX-21
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Projected Revenues
The City's tax base was projected to increase decrease for 2009, assuming a ~ 3.00% rate of
growth for the adjusted taxable value of property (including new construction), as indicated below.
The City's assessment ratio is projected to remain stable at 96%.
Tax Base
20M 2009
2002 2010
2003 2011
2004 2012
2005 2013
200i
Adjusted
taxable
income
$ 4<12,505,001 $ 459,0911,939 $ 476,315,149 $ 494,176,967 $ 512,700,603 $ 531,935,176
$980.595,906 $1,010.013,783 $1.040.314.197 $1.071,523.623 $1.103.669.331
SOURCE: City of Edgewater Finance Dept.
Ad valorem tax yields were projected assuming the fiscal year ~ 2009 rate of millage and the
average annual increase (~ 3.00%) in adjusted taxable value over the past next five years. It
should be noted that the five-year average rate for millage amounts to a rate of 6:2+7 5.900 per
$1,000 of taxable property value. , which is higher than the current budgeted rate of 5.95 fDr fiscal
year ~
Tax Base 200t 2002 200a 2212 ~2Qll ;!004 W2 200S 2W i!OO6
Ad Valorem
Tax
Yield
$2,527,589
$5.554.095
$2,622,a73
$5.720.718
$2,729,712
$~
$2,822,739
$6.069.110
$2,928,592
$6.251.183
$3,938,1H
SOURCE: City of Edgewater Finance Dept. Assume a collection of 96% of the total ad valorem tax billings.
Table 3 indicates the revenues expected to be available to the City to finance the expenditures and
capital improvements for the years 2001 2006 2009-2013. Revenue projections are based on past
trends and anticipated changes in funding sources. These amounts are represented in ~ 2009
dollars.
IX-22
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
TABLE 3
REVENUE PROJECTIONS AFFECTING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
2Ot>>- 2009 2002 2010 ~ 2011 2004 2012 2006 2013 2006
FUND
General Fund
Ad Valorem $ 2,527,589 $ 2,622,373 $ 2,720,712 $ 2,822,739 $ 3,038,414 $ 3,038,414
$ 5,554,095 $ 5,720,718 $ 5,892,340 $ 6,069,110 $ 6,251,183
Franchise Fees $ 6n, 4 00 $ 685,185 $ 697,175 $ 709,376 $ 134,421 $ 734,421
$ 1,003,256 $ 1,033,354 $ 1,064,354 $ 1,096,285 $ 1,129,173
State Shared Revenues $ 1,785,000 $ 1,963,500 $ 2,159,850 $ 2,375,835 $ 2,!l74,760 $ 2,!l74, 760
$ 1,396,000 $ 1,437,880 $ 1,481,016 $ 1,525,447 $ 1,571,210
Utility Tax $ 1,397,000 $ 1,57!l,610 $ 1,783,829 $ 2,015, 727 $ 2,513,882 $ 2,573,882
$ 1,746,410 $ 1,798,802 $ 1,852,766 $ 1,908,349 $ 19,695,600
Other $ 2,170,33!l $ 2,387,926 $ 2,615,034 $ 2,!l51 ,052 $ 3,346, 166 $ 3,346,166
$ 3,847,786 $ 3,963,220 $ 4,082,116 $ 4,204,580 $ 4,330,717
Subtotal: $ 8,553,327 $ 9,237,591 $ 9,976,600 $ 10,771,729 $ 12,567,613 $ 12,567,6<13
$13.547.547 $13.953.974 $14.372.593 $14.803.771 $15.247.884
Enterprise Funds:
Wastewater $ 2,133,500 $ 2,210,175 $ 2,352,181 $ 2,169,793 $ 2,593,283 $ 2,722,947
$ 3,800,000 $ 3,914,000 $ 4,031,420 $ 4,152,363 $ 4,276,933
"NIfV Spec. Assess $ 1,850,000 $ 1,!l50,OOO $ 1,850,000 $ 1,850,000 $ 1,!l50,OOO $ 1,!l50,OOO
Reclaimed $ 413,170 $ 425,565 $ 438,332 $ 451,482 $ 465,026
Solid Waste $ 1,2!l1,531 $ 1,307,162 $ 1,333,305 $ 1,359,971 $ 1,3!l7,170 $ 1,111,911
Refuse $ 2,979,046 $ 3,068,417 $ 3,160,470 $ 3,255,284 $ 3,352,943
Water $ 2,929,000 $ 3,101,710 $ 3,291,021 $ 3,188,1!l6 $ 3,697, 795 $ 3,919,663
$ 3,800,000 $ 3,914,000 $ 4,031,420 $ 4,152,363 $ 4,276,933
Stormwater $ !l78,!l35 $ 913,9B8 $ 950,51B $ 9BB,570 $ 1,028,113 $ 1,069,237
$ 1,064,101 $ 1,096,024 $ 1,128,905 $ 1,162,772 $ 1,197,655
Net Bond Proceeds $ 2,000,000 $ 8,070,000 $ 7,500,000 $ 6,500,000
Reclaimed Water loan $ 1,000,000
beaR
Subtotal $12.056.317 $12.418.007 $20.860.547 $20.674.263 $20.069.491
Total Revenues $ 29,179,520 $ 27,891,251 $ 29,130,262 $ 31, 706,277 $ 33,829, 775 $ 361,112,047
$25.603.864 $26.371.980 $35.233.140 $35.478.034 $35.317,375
The Enterprise Fund projected revenues for each account include anticipated income from user
charges, connection fees, impact fees, assessment receipts, and customer service charges. The
revenue projections for wastewater and water user charges and connection fees are based on current
individual fee amounts (average monthly charge and connection fees) and projected total service
connections. Solid waste user charge revenue projections are based on current average monthly
charges also.
IX-23
CITY OF EDGEWA TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
The amount shown for net bond proceeds represents the use of bond proceeds which are
anticipated to be issued for major capital projects. The amounts shown reflect the year when the
proceeds are estimated to be encumbered for the project and not he use of the proceeds deposited
in the construction fund for financing the project.
Projected Expenditures
The projected expenditures have been separated into three categories for the purpose of this
assessment: (i) scheduled capital improvement project expenditures; (ii) capital improvement debt
service expenditures; and (ill) operating cost expenditures. The first category of expenditure
represents the direct cost of those capital improvements expected to be incurred annually, those
identified by the other CP elements, and those identified by the City's Capital Improvements
Program (in addition to the CIP projects already identified by the other CP elements). Table 4 lists
these projected expenditures by Fund for 2001 2006 2009-2013.
TABLE 4
EXPENDITURE PROJECTIONS FOR SCHEDULED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
FUND
General Fund
Annual Capital Expenditures
CIE Projects
Enterprise Funds
Annual Capital Expenses
Wastewater
-Watef
Water/Sewer
Refuse
Stormwater
Total Expenses
CIE Projects
'Nae:tewater
-Watef
Storm water
20M 2009 2002 2010 2003 2011 2004 2012 2005 2013 2006
$ 350,000 $ 3EiO,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000
$ 1,695,779 $ 1,177,000 $ 977 ,000 $ 616,000 $ 1,925,000
$ 663,703 $ 987,105 $ 1,649,413 $ 2,985,1il37
$ 977 ,000
$ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 7Ei,000 $ 75,000 $ 7Ei,OOO
$ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000
$ 2,072,081 $ 5,928,000 $ 12,960,000 $ 8,045,000 $ 7,010,000
$ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000
$ 210,000 $ 352,000 $ 380,000 $ 75,000 $ 240,000
$ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000
$ 96,750 $ 25,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 210,000
$ 4,074,610 $ 7,482,000 $ 14,347,000 $ 8,766,000 $ 9,385,000
$ 100,000 $ 2,1il7Ei,OOO $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000
$ 750,000 $ 350,000 $ EiOO,OOO
$ 135,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 270,000 $ 270,000
$ 575,000 $ 1il10,000 $ 4,953, 703 $ 2, 102,105 $ 3,094,413 $ 3,930,837
IX-24
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
The second category includes the projected expenditures required to meet debt service requirements
for outstanding bond issues, as well as planned future bond issues included in the revenue projects
in Table 4. The future debt issues are anticipated by the City to provide monies to fund the
reclaimed water improvements as well as various general improvements. In addition to long-term
indebtedness, the City utilizes short-term borrowing for minor capital expenditures. Table 5 lists the
projected debt service expenditures by Fund.
TABLE 5
DEBT SERVICE EXPEDNITURE PROJECTIONS
20M 2009 2002 2010 2003 2011 2004 2012 200S 2013 200G
FUND
General Fund
Special Assess. $ 911,370 $ 911,370 $ 911,370 $ 911,370 $ 911,370 $ 911,370
$ 900,349 $ 900,349 $ 478,320
Enterprise Funds
Wastewater
State SRF Loan $ 1,811,438 $ 1,811,438 $ 1,811,438 $ 1,811,438 $ 1,811,438 $ 1,811,438
$ 1,811,438 $ 1,811,438 $ 1,811,438 $ 1,811,438 $ 1,811,438
Water
Other Outstanding Debt $ 1,067,687 $ 1,066,813 $ 1,068,262 $ 1,068,328 $ 1,068,060 $ 1,068,060
$ 1,367,687 $ 1,366,813 $ 1,368,262 $ 1,368,262 $ 1,368,262
Stormwater
Other Outstanding Debt $ 379,530 $ 377,530 $ 375,530 $ 373,530 $ 371,530 $ 369,530
$ 387,835 $ 387,835 $ 164,641
The debt service to fund the enterprise component of the CIP program consists entirely of revenue
bonds and special assessment bonds. Based on the opinion of the City's Council, this debt does not
come under the current charter provisions of the City. With respect to the general debt associated
with the General Fund, the current charter requires that the City not incur additional debt of more
than .75% of the net taxable ad valorem property value during any forward moving five (5) year
period unless such debt was approved by a referendum of eligible voters in a general election. Based
on the current Charter provisions, the estimated debt service capacity assuming assessed valuation
rates is as follows:
Value for ~ 2009
Charter Limitation at .75%
$~ ~2,505,001 $980.595.906
$ 3,318,788 $7.354.469
IX-25
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
The final category of expenditures contains the annual operating costs for providing the necessary
facility improvements and services to the City's customers. These operating costs consist of the
recurring expenses associated with the normal operation of capital facilities such as supplies,
maintenance, personnel, and utility costs associated with the assessed capital improvement needs.
The operating costs have been assigned to the first year in which they are expected to be incurred
based on the" schedule of improvement contained in Table 4. Table 6 presents the annual operating
expenditure of the City for years 2001 2006 2009-2013.
Table 6
ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES
Millions of Dollars
20M 2009 2002 2010 2003 2011 2004 2012 2005 2013 2006
FUND
General Fund $ a,51€l,e15 $ 8,97J,916 $ 9,122,643 $ 9,893,775 $ 10,388, 4134 $ 10,907,a87
$ 12,647,198 $ 13,026,614 $ 13,417,412 $ 13,819,935 $ 14,234,533
Enterprise Fund
W ater/W astewater $ 3,028,572 $ 3,210,286 $ 3,402,903 $ 3,1307,078 $ 3,823,502 $ 4,052,913
$ 6,662,689 $ 6,862,570 $ 7,068,447 $ 7,280,500 $ 7,498,915
Refuse $ 1,157,521 $ 1, 192,247 $ 1,228,014 $ 1,264,854 $ 1,302,800 $ 1,341,881
$ 2,979,046 $ 3,068,417 $ 3,160,470 $ 3,255,284 $ 3,352,943
Stormwater $ 122,305 $ 4134,536 $ 510,989 $ 562,088 $ 618,297 $ 680, 126
$1.064.101 $1,096.024 $1.128.905 $1,162,772 $1,197.655
In order to assess the City's capability to fund the necessary capital improvement expenditures, a
determination of revenue sufficiency must be made. This capability is shown by finding the
difference between the projected annual revenues and expenditures for each fund the City uses to
finance the capital improvements. The assessment results are shown in Table 7.
IX-26
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAP IT AL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
TABLE 7
FISCAL ASSESSMENT NO.1
FUND 20M 2009 2003 2010 2003 2011 2004 2012 2006 2013 2006
GENERAL FUND
REVENUES $ 9,553,527 $ 237,593 $ 9,976,601 $ 10,774,729 $ 11,636, 707 $ 12,567,644
$ 13,447,547 $ 13,850,973 $ 14,266,503 $ 14,694,498 $ 15,135,333
EXPENDITURES $ 9,1107,9115 $ 10,245,316 $ 11,357,716 $ 12, 152,250 $ 13,309,247 $ 15,155,094
$ 13,447,547 $ 13,850,973 $ 14,266,503 $ 14,694,498 $ 15,135,333
BALANCE $ (254,4511) $ (1,007,723) $ (1,3111,115) $ (1,377,521) $ (1,672,540) $ (2,5117,450)
ENTERPRISE FUND
WATERlWASTEWATER
REVENUES $ 11,912,500 $ 7,194,915 $ 7,493,208 $ 7,11011,279 $ 11,141,078 $ 8, 492,610
$ 9,841,814 $ 10,137,068 $ 10,441,180 $ 10,754,416 $ 11,077,048
EXPENSES $ 11,012,697 $ 313,537 $ 1,012,603 $ 7,061,844 $ 7,428,000 $ 7,137,411
$ 9,841,814 $ 10,137,068 $ 10,441,180 $ 10,754,416 $ 11,077,048
BALANCE $ (2,100,197) $ 1181,378 $ (2,519,395) $ 746,435 $ 713,078 $ 1,355,199
REFUSE
REVENUES $ 1,2111,531 $ 1,307,162 $ 133,305 $ 1,359,971 $ 1,387,170 $ 1,414,914
$ 2,979,046 $ 3,068,417 $ 3,160,470 $ 3,255,284 $ 3,352,943
EXPENSES $ 1,257,521 $ 1,292,247 $ 1,328,014 $ 1,364,1154 $ 1,402,1100 $ 1,441,11114
$ 2,979,046 $ 3,068,417 $ 3,160,470 $ 3,255,284 $ 3,352,943
BALANCE $ 24,010 $ 14,915 $ 5,291 $ (4,11113) $ (15,630) $ (26,970)
STORMWATER
REVENUES $ 878,835 $ 913,988 $ 950,548 $ 9118,570 $ 1,028,113 $ 1,069,237
$ 1,444,601 $ 1,067,601 $ 1,099,629 $ 11,132,618 $ 1,166,596
EXPENSES $ 821,835 $ 997,066 $ 996,519 $ 1,045,618 $ 1,279,827 $ 1,339,656
$ 1,444,601 $ 1,487,939 $ 1,332,577 $ 1,182,577 $ 1,197,457
BALANCE $ 57,000 $ (113,078) $ (45,971) $ (57,048) $ (251,714 ) $ (270, 419)
($420,338) ($232.948) ($49.959) ($30.860)
Included in Table 7 are the projected revenues (as previously listed in Table 3) and expenditures
(consisting of the sum of the cost and expenditures shown in Tables 4, 5, and 6). Improvement
costs for transportation and recreation have been included in the General Fund, improvement costs
for wastewater, water, and solid waste are included in the Enterprise Fund, and stormwater
improvement costs have been included in the Stormwater Fund. The balance of each fund indicates
the difference between the projected revenues and expenditures. Revenue shortfalls for a given year
are indicated by a negative balance.
The City uses revenues from both the General and Enterprise Funds to meet annual operating
expenses. The General Fund is primarily used for transportation and recreation/ park operating
services, while the Enterprise Fund is used for the operating costs associated with the Public Works
and Utilities Departments. Also included in the General Fund are CIP projects associated with
paving and drainage activities, and expenditure of the Public Works Department.
IX-27
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Supplemental funding is provided by the fees collected by the various departments from the persons
direcdy receiving the service.
The City-wide millage rate and the Enterprise Fund user charges are reviewed periodically by the
City as part of its budgeting process. Adjustments are made in order to ensure that sufficient funds
are available to meet expected expenses, including a reserve for contingency funds. In anticipation
of future increases in operating costs, the City may desire to adjust the millage rate and/or user
charges upward by small increments over a period of several years. This will initially provide
additional operating reserves, which can later be used to offset operating expense increases as they
occur and allow the City to moderate annual charges in the millage rates and user charges. For
example, a one-half mill ($0.0005) increase in the ad valorem tax millage rate will generate
approximately $212,402 $114.406 for the anticipated ~ 2009 adjusted taxable value of
$442,505,001 $980.595.906. In addition, the following increases in ad valorem tax revenues could
result for 2001 2006 2009-2013:
Tax Base 20M 2009 2002 2010 2003 2011 2004 2012 2005 2013 2006
Result of
one-half
mill
increase $ 2,739,991 $ 2,842,741 $ 2,919,313 $ J,059,944 $ 3,174,692 $ J,293,743
$5.834.546 $6.009.582 $6.189.869 $6.375.566 $6.566.833
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Within this section, the projected revenue shortfalls as indicated in Table 7 are identified. Various
methods of overcoming these revenue shortfalls are examined herein, and recommendations
developed as to the most appropriate methods of balancing the revenue and expenditure streams for
the City's funds. These balanced revenue/expenditure streams are shown in Table 7 and indicate
the achiev~ment of an economically feasible comprehensive plan.
General Fund: As shown in Table 7, the General Fund is projected to have rcvcnue shortfalls a
balanced budget during 2001 2006 2009-2013. This i3 largely due to the capital improvement
projects that arc planned during the next five ycars.
In order to balance the projected revenuc and cxpenditure streams within the General Fund, the
f'Ollowing changcs in funding strategies will be implemented:
1. Increase the ad "valorem tax assessment only if necessary to fund indi"lidual years;
2. Use appropriated rcserve trust for lands, parks and open space to fund capital
impro>v'ements, as well as other fund balances reservcd f'Or capital impro>v'cments,
extensions and inventories;
IX-28
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
3. Implement a tillflsportation impact fee (in addition to the eurrent County fee) and a
police/fire impact fee in fiscal year 2001;
4. }~pply fur vll:f:ious grants from statc agencies to assist with nrious projects; and
5. Carry forward or use unreserved fund balanccs as rc;cnues.
Enterprise Fund: Similar to thc Ceneral Fund, the Enterprise Fund is showing re-venue shortfalls
for the years 2001 2006. These revenue shortfalls arc primarily due to the improvements to and
expansion of the City's wastewater tfeatment and disposal facilitics, reclaimed facilities and water
plant improvements. The Enterprise Fund is showing revenue shortfalls for the years 2010-2013.
These revenue shortfalls are primarily due to the improvements to and expansion of the City's
stormwater system.
The balancing of the projected revenue and expenditure streams within the Enterprise Fund
recommended will be accomplished by the following funding strategy changes:
WASTEWATER: STORMWATER:
1. Initiate a wastewater service rate, connection charge, and impact fee increase in
2001; and
1. Apply for various grants from state agencies to assist with various projects; and
2. Obtain short term financing via low interest loans; and
3. Carry forward any unexpected funds as revenue.
SOLID WASTE:
1. Use appropriated retained earnings reserved for equipment purchases and other
unreserved retained to fund impro'J'cments;
2. Carry forn'ard any unexpended funds as revenues.
W f~TER:
1. Apply for -varioU3 grants from state agencies to assist with -.rarious projects; and
2. Obtain short term financing via low intcrest loans; and
3. Carry for-vard any unexpended funds as re-venue.
In the event that some of the proposed sources are not attained, the following alternative strategies
will be pursued;
1. Additional deferral of projects to later years;
2. Procurement of additional revenue bonds instead of funding projects on a "pay-
as-you.,go" basis;
3. Procurement of additional grant funding;
4. Procurement of a state revolving fund loan; and
5. Increase user fees for municipal services.
Additionally, improved planning and coordination will be initiated among the City's utility
departments in order to ensure that public facility and service provision is optimally times for cost
IX-29
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
effectiveness. For example, department representatives will work together to encourage the
provision of public facilities and services concurrently (where feasible), in order to limit the negative
impacts of separate installation Q.e. construct water/sewer semces prior to paving/drainage
improvements).
Also, other entities which share facilities with the City (such as FDOT and Volusia County) sharing
the use of the U.S. Highway No. 1 within the City limit(s) will be coordinated with regarding
improvements to their shared facilities.
FUND
20M 2009
GENERAL FUND
REVENUES
$ 9,807,985
$13.447.547
$ 9,807,985
$13.447.547
$
EXPENDITURES
BALANCE
ENTERPRISE FUND
W A TER/W ASTEW A TER
REVENUES
$ 11,012,1397 $
$ 9,841,814 $
$ 11,012,1397 $
$ 9,841,814 $
$ $
EXPENSES
BALANCE
REFUSE
REVENUES
$ 1,281,5~1 $
$ 2,979,046 $
$ 1,257,521 $
$ 2,979,046 $
$ 24,010 $
EXPENSES
BALANCE
STORMWATER
REVENUES
$ 878,8J5 $
$ 1.444,601 $
$ 821,8J5 $
$ 1,444,601 $
$ 57,090 $
EXPENSES
BALANCE
TABLE 8
FISCAL ASSESSMENT NO.2
2002 2010
2003 ~
2004 2012
2006 2013
$ 10,245,~16
$13.850.973
$ 10,245,~16
$13.850.973
$
$ 11,357,716
$14.266.503
$ 11,357,716
$14.266.503
$
$ 12, 152,250
$14.694.498
$ 12, 152,250
$14.694.498
$
$ 1~,J09,247
$15.135.333
$ 1~,J09,247
$15.135.333
$
7,194,915 $
10,137,068 $
6,~1~,5~7 $
10,137,068 $
881 ,~78 $
10,012,603 $
10,441,180 $
1 ,012,eO~ $
10,441,180 $
$
7,808,279 $
10,754,416 $
7,061,844 $
10,754,416 $
746,435 $
8, 141,078
11,077 ,048
7,428,000
11 ,077 ,048
71 ~,078
1 ,~07, Hl2 $ 13~,~05 $
3,068,417 $ 3,160,470 $
1,292,247 $ 1,328,014 $
3,068,417 $ 3,160,470 $
14 ,915 $ 5,291 $
997,066 $
1,487,939 $
997,066 $
1,487,939 $
$
996,519 $
1,332,577 $
996,519 $
1,332,577 $
$
1 ,~64 ,854 $
3,255,284 $
1 ,~64 ,854 $
3,255,284 $
$
1,402,800
3,352,943
1,402,800
3,352,943
1,045,618 $ 1,279,827
1,182,577 $ 1,197,457
1,045,618 $ 1,279,827
1,182,577 $ 1,197,457
$
IX-30
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
E. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
GOAL 1
The City shall undertake all actions necessary to ensure that needed public facilities and services are
provided to all residents within the City's jurisdiction in a manner which maximizes the use of
existing facilities, promotes orderly compact urban growth, and protects the City's investments in its
existing facilities.
Objective 1: Capital improvements will be provided to correct existing deficiencies, to
accommodate projected future growth, and to replace obsolete or worn-out facilities, as
indicated in the 5-year Schedule of Improvements delineated in this element.
Policy 1.1.1: The City shall include all projects identified in the CP which are
determined to be of relatively large scale and high cost ($25,000 or
greater) in the 5-year Schedule of Improvements as capital
improvement projects; all other capital improvements shall be
included in the 6-2-year capital improvements program and annual
capital budget.
Policy 1.1.2: The City shall, as a mattcr of priority, schcdule and fund all capital
impro';cmcnts identificd by thc 5 ycar Schedule of Impro-;cmcnts as
nccessary to corrcct cxisting dcficiencics for accounting purposes.
also include this Element in conjunction with Debt Service and
Operating expenditures.
Policy 1.1.3 The City shall, as a matter of priority, schedule and fund all capital
improvements identified by the 5-year Schedule of Improvements.
Policy 1.1.4 The City shall continue to adopt a Capital Improvements Program
and annual budget as a part of its budgeting process. The City will
review the Capital Improvements Program annually together with the
Water Facilities Supply Work Plan to include the water related
projects identified for the first five years of the Work Plan. The
program shall be "financially feasible" as defined in Florida Statutes.
Policy 1.1.5: The proposed capital improvement projects shall be evaluated and
ranked in order of priority according to the following guidelines:
a. Whether the project is needed to protect public health and
safety, to fulfill the City's legal commitment to provide facilities
and services, to reduce waste of water resources, or to preserve
or achieve full use of the existing facilities;
IX-31
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
b. Whether the project promotes the City's development of
alternative water supplies. corrects water supply deficiencies or
otherwise results in a reduction in future dependence on Upper
Floridian aquifer water sources to support future growth of the
City.
c. Whether the project Increases the efficiency of use of the
existing facilities, prevents or reduces future improvement
cost~, provides service to developed areas lacking full service,
or promotes infill development; and
d. Whether the project represents a logical extension of facilities
and services within a designated utility service area
e. Whether the project implements the policies if thus
Comprehensive Plan as they pertain to the concurrency
requirements;
f. Whether the project is financially feasible.
Objective 2: The proportionate share of facility improvements which are necessitated by
future development in order to maintain adopted LOS standards shall be borne by those
direcdy benefiting from the improvements.
Policy 1.2.1: The City shall continue to implement its impact fee programs as
conditions to providing utility services to new developments.
Policy 1.2.2: The City will inov'cstigate the possibility of setting up has implemented
a transportation impact fee ordinance. as well as a mandatory
dedication of f-ces in lieu of ordinance.
Objective 3: The City will manage its financial resources to ensure the proVlslon of
needed capital improvements for previously issued development orders for
future development and redevelopment.
Policy 1.3.1: The City will not issue development orders or permits unless public
facilities (which meet the adopted level of service standards) needed
to support development or redevelopment are available, or will be
available concurrendy with the impacts of the development.
Policy 1.3.2: The maximum ratio of outstanding indebtedness (for providing
capital improvements) to the property tax base shall be limited by the
City to no greater than .75%.
Policy 1.3.3: The City shall continue to adopt a 6 .5.-year capital improvements
program and annual budget as a part of its budgeting process.
IX-32
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
The City will continue to apply for water, wastewater, solid waste,
and other available grants on an annual basis to obtain funding to
finance the provision of capital improvements.
Policy 1.3.4:
Objective 4: The City shall base all decisions regarding the issuance of development
orders and permits on the coordination of the development requirements included in this
CP, its land development regulations and ordinances, and the availability of public facilities
needed to support such development at the time it is needed.
Policy 1.4.1: The City shall use the following LOS standards in reviewing the
impacts of new development and redevelopment upon public facility
provlslOn:
95 gallons per capita per day 204 gallons per
equivalent residential unit per day
2.75 pound per capita per day
Level A - No significant street flooding
Level B - No major residential yard flooding
Level C - No significant structure flooding
Level D - No limitation on flooding
(Based on 25-year/24-hour storm event)
100 gallons per capita per day 204 gallons per
equivalent residential unit per day
Collector Roadways: LOS D for peak hour volumes
Arterial Roadways: LOS D for peak hour volumes
Limited Access Road: LOS C
Public Transit Facilities 01 olusia County): In process of establishing
LOS Standards.
Sanitary Sewer:
Solid Waste:
Drainage:
Potable Water:
Recreation Standards for Facilities:
Facility
Parkland
Baseball/Softball
Basketball Court
Tennis Court
Handball/Racquetball Court
Community Center
Multi-Purpose/Soccer
Shuffle Board Court
Bocci Ball Court
Volley Ball Court
Unit of Measure
5 acres/ 1,000 persons
1 field/4,000 persons
1 court/5,000 persons
1 court/3,500 persons
1 court/4,000 persons
1 facility /30,000 persons
1 field/4,000 persons
1 court/l ,500 persons
1 court/l 0,000 persons
1 court/5,000 persons
IX-33
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Boat Ramps
Bike/Pedestrian Trail
Fitness Trails
Activities Center
Gymnasium
1 ramp/4,700 persons
1 mile/4,000 persons
1/14,000 persons
1/15,000 persons
N/A
Policy 1.4.2: The City shall evaluate all proposed CP amendments and requests for
new development or redevelopment according to the following
guidelines as to whether the proposed action would:
a. Contribute to a condition of public hazard as described in the
Utilities Element;
b. Exacerbate any existing condition of public facility capacity
deficits as described in the Utilities Element, the Transportation
Element, and the Recreation and Open Space Element;
c. Generate public facility demands that may be accommodated by
capacity increases planned in the 5-year Schedule of
Improvements;
d. Conform with future land uses as shown on the Future Land Use
Map of the Future Land Use Element, and urban service areas as
described in the Utilities Element;
e. If public facilities are developer-provided, accommodate public
facility demands based on adopted LOS standards;
f. If public facilities are provided, in part or whole, by the City,
demonstrate financial feasibility, subject to this element; and
g. Affect state agencies and water management districts' facilities
plans.
Objective 5: The City amend its Land Development Code to limit the size and density of
developments in the coastal high-hazard area, as defined by the Coastal Management
Element.
Policy 1.5.1: The City will not construct public facilities east of U.S.
Highway 1 unless no other feasible sites are available outside
the coastal high-hazard area. Where it becomes necessary to
construct public facilities in the coastal high-hazard area, the
design of the facilities will incorporate flood proofing and
additional structural support in order to ensure minimum
damage from storms and hurricanes.
IX-34
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPIT ALIMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Policy 1.5.2:
The City will limit public expenditures that subsidize
development in coastal high-hazard areas except for the
restoration and enhancement of natural resources.
GOAL 2
Provide for a financially feasible public school facilities program.
Objective 2.1: Level Of Service Standards. The City shall ensure that the capacity of schools is
sufficient to support residential subdivisions and site plans at the adopted level of service
standard. This level of service standard shall be consistent with the level of service standard
adopted in the interlocal agreement entered into by the School Board and the local
governments within V olusia County.
Policy 2.1.1: The level of service standard adopted by the City shall be
applied consistently by all local governments within V olusia
County and by the School Board district-wide to all schools
of the same type.
Policy 2.1.2: Consistent with the interlocal agreement, the uniform,
district-wide level-of-service standards are set as follows using
FISH capacity based on the traditional school calendar:
a. Elementary Schools: 115% of permanent FISH
capacity for the concurrency service area.
b. K- 8 Schools: 115% of permanent FISH capacity for
the concurrency service area.
c. Middle Schools: 115% of permanent FISH capacity
for the concurrency service area
d. High Schools: 120% of permanent FISH capacity for
the concurrency service area
e. Special Purpose Schools: 100% of permanent FISH
capacity.
Policy 2.1.3: The following schools shall achieve the adopted level of
service no later than the identified date. The level of service
presented in the following table is the tiered level of service
that shall apply to that school unit the date noted in the table.
IX-35
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
School LOS DATE
Orange City Elementary 117% July 1, 2012
Horizon Elementary 158% July 1,2012
Freedom Elementary 126% July 1, 2012
Osceola Elementary 117% July 1, 2012
Ortona Elementary 150% July 1, 2012
Ormond Beach Elementary 116% July 1, 2012
Southwestern Middle 120% July 1. 2013
New Smyrna Beach Middle 122% July 1, 2014
(Note: This policy designates a tiered LOS for those schools that exceed the desired
levels at the end of the five- year capital improvements program.)
Objective 2.2: School CaPital Facilities Planning. The City shall cooperate with the School
Board to ensure existing deficiencies and future needs are addressed consistent with adopted
level of service standards for public schools.
Policy 2.2.1: The City adopts by referenc~ the School Board's five-year
work program approved annually each September as part of
the overall School District budget. The City shall review the
annual work program to verify that it is financially feasible
and will maintain the level of service standards by the end of
the five-year period.
Policy 2.2.2: The City shall coordinate with the school board and adopt
development conditions to ensure that future development
pays a proportionate share of the costs of capital facility
capacity needed to accommodate new development and to
assist in maintaining the adopted level of service standards via
impact fees and other legally available and appropriate
methods.
IX-36
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE (5-YEAR)
As shown in TABLE 9, the Five (5) Year Schedule ofImprovements is the mechanism by which the
City can effectively stage the timing, location, projected cost, and revenue sources for the capital
improvements derived from all the CP elements, in support of the Future Land Use Element. This
5- Year Schedule of Improvements has been used to document the "economic feasibility" of the
City's CP, based upon the preceding sections of this element en tided "Capital Improvements
Inventory", "Financial Analysis", and "Goals, Objectives, and Policies".
The generallocatiofls of thc scheduled projects arc shown on Map IX 1.
IX-37
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
2004 20011 $ 250,000 General Fund R
PU8l1C SAFETY: (Fire/Rescue}
Replace ressue pumper 2003& 2005 $ 499,540 General Fund R
.'\lS Apparatus at ne'll station 2003 2005 $ 390,000 General Fund N
Replace Ball. 57 2004 $ 32,400 General Fund R
Replace Military Brush Truck :IDQ5 $ 84,413 Geneml Fund R
Replace Utility Support Truck :mgJ $ 29,705 Geneml Fund R
DRAINAGE:
Conduct City wide Storm'A'3ter Management System Analysis and
Impr-ovement Study
Implementation of improvements in Stormwater Master Plan
Conduct impro'.'ements to Gabordy System Channel G2
Maintain existing EtructUrBS in 18th Sl. Channel E1
2 Maintain exiEting Etructures in 18th Sl. Channel 64
Maintain exiEting EtructureE in 18th Sl. Channel Ell
SANITARY SEWER:
WWTF Reclaimed Water ImprovementE
3 'NeEtern Service Area Collection & TranEmission Systom
Conduct exisling gravity Eewer Eyslem repairs
4
POTA8LE WATER:
No..... wellE
Ii SR 442 Water System UP9mdo
e Southern service area ground Etorage tank
7-
8 PARKS 8. RECREATION:
Q ConEtruct BaEeball/Softball tieldE/HawkE Park
-to ConEtruct Conservation mea/HawkE Park
-1+ ConEtruct .Il.mphilheater
-1-2 Renovate ami sonslruct soccer complex
~ PurchaEe land for park
-14 Develop cultural and arbortoreum Park
PurchaEe land for nature park
Develop nature park
Renovation of Kennedy Park
:'dditional boat ramps Manard May Park
*Location yet to be determined
Legend: R - Replacement, N - New, E - Expanded
2002 $
2002 2006 $
2004 20011 $
2002 20011 $
2002 20011 $
2002 20011 $
N
N
N
Stormwater
Stormwater
Stormwater
Stomlwater
Stormwater
Storm'...,ater
120,000
300,000
3110,OOO
25,000
25,000
25,000
e
e
e
2002 $ 2,000,000 Waler/Sewer Fund e
:mgJ $ 775,000 Water/Sewer Fund N
2002 2006 $ 500,000 Water/Sewer Fund R
:mgJ $ 350,000 Water/Sewer Fund N
2002 $ 750,000 Water/Sewer Fund e
2004 $ 500,000 Water/Sewer Fund
2002 $ 500,000 Geneml Fund e
2002 $ 25,000 Geneml Fund e
2002 $ 45,000 Geneml Fund e
2002 2004 $ 150,000 General Fund R
2002 $ 450,000 General Fund N
:mgJ $ 25,000 Geneml Fund N
2002 2004 $ 35Q,OOO General Fund N
2QOO $ 200,000 Goneral Fund N
2005 20011 $ 750,000 Genor.:]1 Fund e
2QOO $ 150.000 General Fund N
IX-38
TABLE 9
City of Edgewater
Five year schedule of improvements
Fiscal Years Ending 2009-2013
PrOject Schedule Cost Revenue Source LOS Non-LOS
PUBLIC SAFETY: (Fire/Rescue)
Vehicle Replacement 2009-2013 $1.056.000 General Fund B
12 Lead/ EKG Monitor 2012 $ 25.000 General Fund B
Genesis Extrication Tool System 2011 $ 30.000 General Fund B
Self Contained Breather Apparatus 2012 $ 100.000 General Fund B
PUBLIC SAFETY: (Police)
Vehicle Replacement 2009-2013 $ 467.616 General Fund B
Police Station Land Acauisition 2009 $ 80.000 Police Impact Fees ~
Radio System Replacement 2010 $ 200.000 General Fund B
LEISURE SERVICES:
Vehicle Replacement 2010-2013 $ 271.000 General Fund B
Animal Shelter 2009 $ 250.000 Capital Fund N
Hawks Park Ampitheater 2009 $ 183.175 Capital Fund N
Kennedy Park Rennovations 2009/2012 $ 545.000 Capital Fund N
Doa Park 2012 $ 50.000 Capital Fund N
Manao Lake Park 2012 $ 500.000 Capital Fund N
Harper Liauid Called Dewees Slope Mower 2009 $ 25.000 General Fund B
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES:
Vehicle Replacement 2009-2013 $2.759.750 Water & Sewer Fund B
Wastewater Slip Iininq 2009 $ 200.000 Water & Sewer Fund B
Bar Screen WWTP 2009 $120.000 Water & Sewer Fund B
SE Service Area Desiqn & Construction 2009-2010 $2.101.400 Water & Sewer Fund N
Retrofit Lift Station 1.2.13 2009-2011 $180.000 Water & Sewer Fund B
(2) 25 HP Compressors WWTP 2009 $30.000 Water & Sewer Fund B
Western Storaae Tank & Pump Station 2010 $130.000 Water & Sewer Fund N
WWTP Rehab/Replacement 2010-2011 $6.000.000 Water & Sewer Fund B
2.5 MGD Wastewater Treatment Plant 2010-2013 $15.000.000 Water & Sewer Fund N
SE Service Area Reclaimed Improvements 2009-2011 $5.350.000 Water & Sewer Fund N
ART Wells 17.18.19.20 2009 $1.210.931 Water & Sewer Fund N
Aerator and stairwav replacement 2009 $200.000 Water & Sewer Fund B
Claricone Paintina 2009 $100.000 Water & Sewer Fund
Replacement of 2" Water Lines 2009 $40.000 Water & Sewer Fund B
Western Reclaimed Water Main Extension 2009-2011 $3.850.000 Water & Sewer Fund N
Sliplinina existina pipes-Wildwood Sub. 2009-2013 $295.000 Stormwater Fund B
Eastern Shores Proiect 2009 $96.750 Stormwater Fund N
PUBLIC WORKS:
Vehicle Replacement 2009 $65.000 General Fund B
Fleet Fuel Tank Replacement 2009 $125.000 General Fund B
30th Street Sidewalk 2009 $157.716 Capital Fund N
Road Repavinq 2009-2013 $2.260.272 Capital Fund
LEGEND: R-REPLACEMENT, N- NEW, E- EXPANDED
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
PROGRAM MONITORING AND EVALUATION
The role of monitoring and evaluation is vital to the effectiveness of any planning program and
particularly to the CIE. This is largely because the City's revenue and expenditure streams are
subject to fluctuations in the market and the economy. It is the behavior of these streams which will
be used to predict fiscal trends in order to maintain the City's adopted LOS standards for public
facilities. Therefore, the CIE requires a continuous program for monitoring and evaluation,
pursuant to Chapter 163, F.S., this element will be reviewed on an annual basis to ensure that
required fiscal resources are available to provide public facilities as necessary to support the adopted
LOS standards.
The annual review will be the responsibility of the local planning agency, and the City Finance
Director and City Manager will serve as advisory members at all formal deliberations related to
capital improvement monitoring and evaluation. The local planning agency's finding and
recommendations will be presented to the City Council at a public meeting. The City Council will
direct staff to take any actions deemed appropriate based on the findings and recommendations of
the local planning agency.
The review will include the following considerations, plus an examination of these considerations in
order to determine their continued appropriateness:
1. Any corrections, updates, modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; acceptance
of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the element; or the date of
construction of any facility enumerated in this element;
2. The CIE's consistency with the CP elements and its support of the Future Land Use
Element;
3. The City's ability to provide public facilities and services within the urban service area in
order to determine any need for boundary modification or adjustment;
4. The priority assignment of existing public facility deficiencies;
5. The City's progress in meeting those needs determined to be existing deficiencies;
6. The criteria used to evaluate capital improvement projects in order to ensure that
projects are being ranked in their appropriate order of priority;
7. The City's effectiveness in maintaining its adopted LOS standards;
8. The City's effectiveness in reviewing the impacts of plans and programs of state agencies
and water management districts that provide public facilities within the City's
jurisdiction;
9. The effectiveness of impact fees for assessing new development a pro rata share of the
improvement costs which they generate;
10. The impacts of special districts and any regional facility and service provision upon the
City's ability to maintain its adopted LOS standards;
11. The ratio of outstanding indebtedness to the property tax base;
12. Efforts made to secure grants and/or private funds, whenever available to finance the
provision of capital improvements;
13. The transfer of any unexpected account balances;
IX-39
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
14. The criteria used to evaluate proposed plan amendments and request for new
development or redevelopment; and
15. Capital improvements needed for the latter part of the planning period, for inclusion in
the 5- Year Schedule of Improvements.
In addition to the annual Capital Improvements Element review mentioned above, each request for
a development order will be reviewed by the Director of Planning, Public Works Director, Utilities
Director, City Engineer a Technical Review Committee. as designated by the City Manager, and
other appropriate personnel for the purpose of establishing whether the various adopted level of
service standards will be adversely impacted if development is allowed to proceed. No development
order will be issued if it is determined that the public facilities needed to maintain the adopted level
of service standards will not be available concurrently with the impact of the development. Further,
issuance of development orders will be delayed until the correction of existing system deficiencies
which are required to increase the level of service provided to the adopted standard are complete.
IX-40
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EFFECTIVE ~ TBD
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
1. PUBLIC FACILITIES, CAPACITIES AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE INVENTORY
FOR CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
The following inventories shall be maintained by the City to be used for the concurrency assessment
of new development.
a) TRANSPORTATION
Design capacity of different roadway types.
The existing level-of-service measured by the p.m. peak hour directional trips.
The status of service degradation of those roads classified as backlogged based on
the methodology described in the Transportation Element of this Plan.
The adopted level-of-service standards for all roadway types.
The existing capacities or deficiencies of the roadway network.
The improvements to be made to the roadway network in the current fiscal year by
the City, Volusia County, the Florida Department of Transportation, or other public
agency and the impact of such improvements on the existing capacities or
deficiencies.
b ) SANITARY SEWER
The capacity of the wastewater treatment facilities.
The existing level-of-service standards measured by the average number of gallons
per day/per unit based on the average flow experienced at the treatment plant and
the total number of equivalent residential units within the service area.
The adopted level-of-service standards for average daily flow per equivalent
residential unit.
The existing deficiencies of the system.
The reserve capacities.
c) POTABLE WATER
The design capacity of potable water treatment facilities.
CM-l
CITY OF EDGEWA TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
The existing level-of-service measured by the average number of gallons per day per
unit based on the average flows experienced and the total number of equivalent
residential units within the service area.
The existing potable water storage capabilities of the water system.
The adopted level-of-service standards for the potable water facility components.
The existing capacities or deficiencies of the system.
The reserved capacities.
d) SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
The design capacity of solid waste disposal facilities.
The existing level-of-service.
The adopted level-of-service standard for solid waste.
The projected capacities or deficiencies.
e) STORMWATER DRAINAGE
The existing level-of-service measured by storm event as determined by the City and
its Consulting Engineers.
The adopted level-of-service standard for stormwater drainage quantity and quality.
t) RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
The existing acreage of parkland and the existing number of recreation facilities as
outlined in the Recreation and Open Space Element of this Plan.
The existing level-of-service measured by the number of acres of parkland available
per 1,000 residents of the City based on an inventory of parklands in the City and the
population of the City.
The existing level-of-service for recreation facilities measured by the adopted
standard based on an inventory of the facilities in the City and the population of the
City.
The adopted level-of-service standards for parkland acreage and individual recreation
facilities as outlined in the Recreation and Open Space Element of this Plan.
The projected capacities or deficiencies.
CM-2
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
2. CONCURRENCY ASSESSMENT
The Planning Department is responsible for determining concurrency for all applications for
development, redevelopment, and subdivision plats. When reviewing applications for such
developments, the Department performs a Concurrency Assessment to ensure that public facilities
are or will be available concurrent with the impacts of the proposed development. The assessment
includes a basis for the establishment of existing conditions and the capacity of existing public
facilities to service new development.
The Department shall identify:
. The ability of existing facilities to accommodate the proposed development at the
adopted level-of-service standards;
. Any existing facility deficiencies that will need to be corrected prior to the
completion of the proposed development;
. The facility(s) improvements or additions that will be needed to accommodate the
impacts of the proposed development at the adopted level(s)-of-service created by
the proposed development; and
. The date such facility(s) improvements or additions will need to be completed to be
concurrent with the impacts on such facility(s) created by the proposed
development; and
. A recommendation or approval or denial with any applicable conditions or the
timing and location of needed improvements.
Prior to the issuance of a development order for a proposed new development, the City Council
and/ or the Planning Department determines:
. The impacts created by the proposed development;
. Whether the public facilities covered under the Concurrency Management System
will be available concurrent with eh impacts of new development at the adopted
level;
. Those facility(s) improvements or additions that are required to ensure the findings
of concurrency; and
. The entity responsible for the design and installation of all required facility(s)
improvements or additions.
a) Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, and Potable Water Facilities
1) A development order is issued subject to the condition that at the time of the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, or its functional equivalent, the
necessary facilities and services are in place and available to service the new
development; or
CM-3
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
2) At the time the development order is issued, the necessary facilities are
guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement pursuant to Section
163.3220, FS; or
3) An agreement, or development order, issued pursuant to Chapter 380, FS, to
be in place and available to serve the new development at the time of the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. (Section 163.3180[2a], FS)
b) Parks and Recreation Facilities
1) At the time the development order is issued, the necessary facilities are in
place, or actual construction has commenced; or
2) A development order is issued subject to the condition that at the time of the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the acreage for the necessary facilities
to serve the new development is dedicated, or acquired by the City, or funds
in the amount of the developer's fair share are committed; and
3) A development order is issued subject to the conditions that the necessary
facilities needed to serve the new development are scheduled to be in place,
or under actual construction, not more than one (1) year after the issuance of
a Certificate of Occupancy, as provided in the City's Capital Improvement
Element; or
4) At the time the development order is issued, the necessary facilities are the
subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the necessary
facilities and services to serve the new development to be in place or under
actual construction no more than one (1) year after issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy or
5) At the time the development order is issued, the necessary facilities are
guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement pursuant to Section
163.3220, FS or under actual construction not more than one (1) year after
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
c) Transportation Facilities
1) At the time a development order is issued, the necessary facilities and
services are in place or under construction; or
2) A development order is issued subject to the conditions that the necessary
facilities and services needed to serve the new development are scheduled to
be in place or under actual construction not more than three (3) years after
the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or its functional equivalent, as
provided in the adopted City's five (5) year schedule of capital
improvements. The schedule of capital improvements may include
transportation projects included in the first three (3) years of the most
current adopted Florida Department of Transportation Five Year Work
Program. The Capital Improvement Element must include the following
policies:
CM-4
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
i. The estimated date of actual project construction commencement
and the estimated completion date;
ii. A provision that a plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer,
or delay construction of any local road facility which is needed to
maintain the adopted level of service standard and which is listed
in the first three (3) years of the five (5) year schedule of
improvements in the Capital Improvements Element.
3) At the time a development order is issued, the necessary facilities are the
subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the necessary
facilities to serve the new development to be in place or under actual
construction no more than three (3) years after the issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy; or
4) At the time a development order is issued, the necessary facilities and
services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant
to Section 163.3220, FS; or an agreement or development order is issued
pursuant to Chapter 380, FS; and will be in place or under actual
construction not more than three (3) years after issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy.
The adopted level-of-service standards (see Table 1) are the minimum acceptable standards with
which all proposed new development shall comply. The Concurrency Management portion of this
element does not preclude the Planning and Zoning Board or the City Council from imposing other
conditions of approval, including improvements and additions to the facilities covered under this
system beyond the minimum necessary to achieve concurrency.
3. GENERAL RULES FOR CONCURRENCY ASSESSMENT
a) EXISTING DEFICIENCIES
No development may be approved which will impact a facility which is currently deficient
unless the facility is required to be improved in the current fiscal year pursuant to a previous
development order or permit. Any needed improvements shall be completed prior to the
projected impacts of the proposed development.
b) APPROVED IMPACTS
The impacts of new development shall be assessed against the existing conditions and the
projected impacts from approved but unbuilt development. These two items together shall
be considered the existing conditions for all public facilities for the impact assessment of all
proposed development.
CM-5
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
c) PHASING
Development that is proposed to be phased may also phase the improvement of facilities
provided the concurrency requirements for each facility are met.
d) TIME SPECIFIC APPROVAL
All development approvals shall have a time period specified in the development order or
permit in which development must commence. The time period may involve two or more
phases but the timing of each phase shall be specified in the development order or permit.
Any required improvements shall also require a time period for construction and
completion. Should development or facilities improvements fail to begin or be completed in
accordance with the development order or permit, all outstanding approvals of the
development shall expire. Amendments to time schedules shall be permitted but must be
approved by the body granting the original approval.
e) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Planning Department may require additional information from applicant or other City
Departments in order for an accurate assessment to be conducted. Such additional
information requests shall be reasonable and be provided in writing to the applicant or
appropriate Department.
Should the Planning Department require a special study (such as traffic counts on a road that
is not regularly monitored), the applicant shall provide such information. Review and
approval of proposed development may be postponed for a reasonable time period in order
that more information may be gathered on a facility. Proposed development may be denied
approval, for failure of the applicant to provide adequate information on the projected
impacts created by the development.
f) TRANSPORTATION
The City's Land Development Code provides development thresholds at which traffic
studies will be required. Required studies shall use the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE)
Manual to calculate the number of trips generated by the proposed development. The study
shall then show the distribution of the projected trips, determine existing condition and
project the level of service of impacted roads.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all facility improvements necessary to
accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving a Certificate of
Occupancy shall be in place. Completed improvements may be required prior to the
issuance of a building permit if deemed necessary for public safety purposes.
g) SANITARY SEWER
The City's Land Development Code provides sanitary sewer use standards for residential
and non-residential development based on equivalent residential units. The City may also
CM-6
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
require commercial and industrial developments to provide a description and estimate of
water use needs for any commercial or industrial processes which create wastewater that will
be discharged into the City's system.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all facility improvements necessary to
accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving a Certificate of
Occupancy shall be in place, as required by the Development Order.
h) POTABLE WATER
The City's Land Development Code provides potable water use standards for residential and
non-residential development based on equivalent residential units. The City may also require
commercial and industrial developments to provide a description and estimate of water use
needs for any commercial or industrial processes involving potable water.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all facility improvements necessary to
accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving a Certificate of
Occupancy shall be in place, as required by the Development Order.
i) SOLID WASTE
The City's Land Development Code provides solid waste standards for control and
operation for residential, commercial and industrial developments. Developments which are
potential hazardous waste generators will be responsible for coordinating with V olusia
County for disposal of such waste.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all facility improvements necessary to
accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving a Certificate of
Occupancy shall be in place.
j) STORMWATER DRAINAGE
All developments shall prepare a drainage plan based on the Stormwater regulation which
incorporate the level-of-service design storm. Such plans shall be approved by the City's
Engineer prior to the approval of the development.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, all facility improvements necessary to
accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving the building permit
shall be approved and all improvements shall be completed prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy.
k) RECREATION
The City's Land Development Code reqwres recreation impact fees for residential
construction and/or land conveyance for new subdivisions. Commercial and industrial
developments shall not be assessed as having an impact on recreational facilities. However,
CM-7
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
the City reserves the right to require the provision of recreational facilities as part of Planned
Unit Developments.
CM-8
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
4) GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
GOAL 1:
The City shall undertake necessary action to economically and efficiently provide needed public
facilities and services to all residents within its jurisdiction in a manner which protects investments in
existing facilities, maximizes the use of existing facilities, and promotes orderly compact urban
growth.
Objective 1.1: Capital Improvements will be provided to correct eXlstlng deficiencies, to
accommodate anticipated future growth, and to replace outdated and obsolete facilities, as indicated
in the Schedule of Improvements of this Element.
Policy 1.1.1 The City shall included all projects identified in the other Elements of
this Comprehensive Plan determined to be of relatively large scale in
cost ($25,000 or greater) as Capital Improvement Projects and are
included within the Schedule of Improvements portion of this
Element.
Policy 1.1.2 The City shall, for accounting purposes, also include into this
Element Debt Service and Operating expenditures.
Policy 1.1.3 The City shall, as a matter of priority, schedule and fund all capital
improvement projects in the City's annual Capital Improvement
Program which are designed to correct existing deficiencies as listed
in the various other Elements of this Plan.
Policy 1.1.4 The City will continue its current program of providing for renewal
and replacement of capital facilities as outlined in the various
Elements of this Plan.
Policy 1.1.5 A Capital Improvements Coordinating Committee shall be created,
composed of thc Dircctor(s) of En-..ironmental Servicc3 (public
'X'orb and Utilities), Recreation and Finance, as well as a
representative from the Planning Department, and the City Manager,
Technical Review Committee members as designated by the City
Manager to evaluate and rank, on an annual basis, in order of priority,
the projects proposed to be included in the Schedule of
Improvements.
Policy 1.1.6 Proposed City Capital Improvement Projects shall be evaluated and
ranked in order of priority according to the following criteria:
CM-9
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
b. Whether the project is needed to protect the public health and safety, to
fulfill the City's legal commitment to provide facilities and services, or to
preserve or achieve full use of those facilities already in place;
c. Whether the project increases efficiency of use of existing facilities,
prevents or reduces future improvement costs, provides services to
develop areas lacking full service, or promotes in-fill development;
d. Whether the project represents a logical extension of facilities and
services within the designated l::tfflaft Utility Service Area Boundary, and
is coordinated with the plans of County and! or State agencies that
provide facilities within the City;
e. Whether the project implements the policies of this Comprehensive Plan
as they pertain to the concurrency requirements;
f. Whether the project is financially feasible.
Objective 1.2: Future development will bear a proportionate cost of facility improvements
necessitated by the development in order to maintain the adopted level-of-service standards.
Policy 1.2.1 The City will continue to collect impact fees from development
projects to pay for the provision of water, sewer, and recreation
facilities required by those projects.
Policy 1.2.2 The City shall consider the use of other impact fees, such as for
public safety services.
Policy 1.2.3 All new development shall be required to donate or reserve their fair
share of right-of-way adjacent to major roadways prior to the
issuance of a final development order.
Objective 1.3: The City will manage its financial resources to ensure the provision of
needed capital improvements for previously issued development orders and for future
development and redevelopment. This objective shall be achieved through the
implementation of the following policies:
Policy 1.3.1 In providing capital improvements, the City shall limit the maximum
ratio of outstanding indebtedness to no greater than t5% of the
property tax base.
Policy 1.3.2 The City shall continue to adopt a Capital Improvement Program and
an operating budget on a yearly basis as part of this budgeting
process.
Policy 1.3.3 The City shall continue to apply for and secure grants or private
funds whenever available to finance the provision of capital
improvements and other City improvement projects.
CM-tO
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
Policy 1.3.4
Prior to the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy, the City will
provide for all public facilities needed to service development for
which Development Orders were previously issued.
Policy 1.3.5
The City shall allocate the costs of new public facilities on the basis
of the benefits received by the existing and future residents.
GOAL 2:
Maintain a Concurrency Management System to ensure public facilities and services to support
development are available concurrent with the impact of development.
Objective 2.1: The City will continue to utilize a Concurrency Management System so that
decisions regarding the issuance of development orders and permits will be based upon
coordination of the development requirements included in this plan, the land development
regulations, and the availability of necessary facilities to support such development.
Policy 2.1.1 The City shall use the level-of-service (LOS) standards (found in
Table I) in reviewing the impacts of new development and/or
redevelopment upon public facilities and services.
CM -11
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
Level-of-Service Standards
TABLE CM-I
Sanitary Sewer 9S gaYofisl capital day
204 o-allons /ERll / day
Solid Waste 2.Slbs/ capital day
Potable Water lOO gaYofis/ capital day
Water quality; Meet State and Federal Drinking Water Standards 204 o-allons/ERU /dav
Drainage 2S vear/24 hr storm
Limited Access Roads C, or as otherwise prescribed bv FOOT
Arterial 0
Collectors 0
Recreation LOS/Person
Parkland S acres/l,OOO persons
Baseball/Softball 1 Field/4,000 persons
Basketball Court 1 court/S,OOO persons
Tennis Court 1 court/3,SOO persons
Handball/Racquetball Court 1 court/4,000 persons
Community Center 1 facility /30,000 persons
Multi-Purpose/Soccer 1 field/4,000 persons
Shuffle Board Court 1 court/l,SOO persons
Bocci Ball Court 1 court/lO,OOO persons
Volley Ball Court 1 court/S,OOO persons
Boat Ramps 1 ramo/4,700 persons
Bike/Pedestrian Trail 1 mile/4,000 persons
Fitness Trails 1 mile/l4,000 persons
Activities Center 1 / 1S ,000 persons
Gymnasium N/l\.
ERU-Equivalent Residential Units
Policy 2.1.2 Prior to the approval of an application for a final subdivision
or development plan, the City will review the proposed
application to ensure that the public facilities and services
needed to support the development are available concurrent
with the impacts of such development based on the
Concurrency Management System.
Policy 2.1.3 Provisions in the Comprehensive Plan that ensure public
facilities and service standards will be met to satisfy the
Concurrency requirements are listed below:
a. The necessary facilities and services are in place at the
time a development permit is issued; or
b. A development permit is issued subject to the
condition that the necessary facilities and services will
be in place when the impacts of the development
occur; or
c. The necessary facilities are under construction at the
time a permit is issued; or
CM -12
,
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
Policy 2.1.4
d. The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in
an enforceable development agreement that includes
the provision of Rules 9J 5.005(2)(a) 1 3 the Florida
Administrative Code. The agreement must guarantee
that the necessary facilities and services will be in
place when the impacts of the development occur; or
e. At the time the development permit is issued, the
necessary facilities and services are the subject of a
binding executed contract which provides for the
commencement of the actual construction of the
required facilities or the provision of services within
one (1) year of the issuance of the applicable
development permit.
f. The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in
an enforceable development agreement which
required the commencement of the actual
construction of the facilities or the provision of
services within one (1) year of the issuance of the
applicable development permit.
Proposed Plan amendments and requests for new
development or redevelopment shall be evaluated according
to the following guidelines as to whether the proposed action
would:
a. Be consistent with the Utilities Element and the Coastal
Management Element and not contribute to a condition of
public hazard.
b. Be consistent with the Transportation Element; Utilities
Element and Recreation and Open Space Element and not
intensify any existing public facility capacity deficits not
envisioned within this plan.
c. Generate public facility demands that may be accomplished
by planned capacity increases.
d. Conform with future land uses as shown on the Future Land
Use Map of the Future Land Use Element.
e. Accommodate public facility demands based upon level-of-
service standards by provision of facilities by the developer or
by the City consistent with this element.
f. Be consistent with the County, State, and Regional agencies
and water management district's facilities plans.
CM -13
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
BY -LA WS
ARTICLE I: Official Name
The official name of this Board shall be the Planning and Zoning Board of the
City of Edgewater, FL, hereinafter referred to as "P & Z Board".
ARTICLE II: Purpose and Intent
The purpose and intent of these By-Laws is to set forth a uniform set of
procedures whereby the City of Edgewater Planning and Zoning Board may regulate the
manner in which it elects officers, conducts meetings and otherwise carries out its
functions. The By-Laws will serve as a guideline in handling all affairs pertaining to the
Edgewater Panning and Zoning Board.
ARTICLE III: Membership
A. Voting Members and Appointments
I. The P&Z Board shall have seven (7) voting members, each member shall be
appointed by City Council for a term of three (3) years and shall be subject to
removal as set forth by City Council. The terms of appointment shall be
staggered.
2. A quorum shall consist of five (5) members. All recommendations and actions
of the Board shall require the affirmative vote of a majority of the members
present.
3. Prior to appointments, prospective members shall submit a City application,
stating therein a brief synopsis of their education, experience and reason for
their interest in serving on the P&Z Board.
4. To be eligible for appointment, a prospective member shall be a resident of
the City of Edgewater.
5. No member of the P&Z Board shall receive compensation for their service,
provided, however, that members may be reimbursed for out-of-pocket
expenses as approved by the City.
6. One (1) non-voting member shall be appointed by the Volusia County School
Board per Florida Statute Section 163.3174(i). The member shall serve
without compensation from the City and shall be exempt from residency and
attendance requirements. The school board member shall comply with all
other procedural standards relating to the P&Z Board.
B. Vacancies
I. During the term of appointment, should a member of the P&Z Board change
residence to the extent he or she would not be eligible for appointment to the
P&Z Board, the member shall forfeit the office and it shall be deemed vacant.
2. U:-a-P&Z Boord member-is absent for threc (3) con~;ecutj\,c rcgul-a-F-Hlcctint;:;.
or i:; nb:;cnt I-BNBur ('I) total-ffi€e+Htg-during any calendar year, :;aid membef
s-I-nttJ-terfeit the office and it shall be deemed \'ae-affi;- If a P&Z Board member
is absent from three (3) consecutive regular meeting without being excused by
the Chairman, said member shall forfeit the oflice and it shall be deemed
vacant. If a board member is absent for five (5) total meetin!!s during any
calendar year, said member shall forfeit the office and it shall be deemed
vacant unless a maiority vote of the remaining Board recommend retention.
3. City Council may remove any member of the P&Z Board from office at any
time.
4. Any vacancy occurring during the unexpired term of office of any member
shall be filled by City Council. The P&Z Board shall review applications and
make a recommendation to City Council. The vacancy shall be filled as soon
as practical after it occurs, for the remainder of the term.
C. Voting Conflicts
1. No member of the P&Z Board shall vote upon any matter which would inure
to his or her special private gain or loss, or any principle by whom he or she is
retained or by any relative or business associate.
2. No member of the P&Z Board shall appear for or represent any person in any
matter before the P&Z Board other than him or herself. No past member shall
appear before the P&Z Board except when representing him or herself for a
period of twelve (12) calendar months after his or her service has ended.
ARTICLE IV: Election of Officers
A. Chairman
1. The Chairman shall serve as the presiding officer at all meetings and hearing
of the P&Z Board and appoint any committees from the P&Z Board
membership that are deemed necessary.
2. The Chairman shall be elected by a majority of the voting membership at the
first regular meeting in January each year. The Chairman shall be eligible for
re-election.
B. Vice Chairman
1. The Vice Chairman shall be elected by the P&Z Board from among its regular
members in the same manner as the Chairman and shall be eligible for re-
election.
2. The Vice Chairman shall serve as acting Chairman in the absence of the
Chairman and at such times shall have the same powers and duties of the
Chairman.
3. In the event of death, resignation or removal from office of the Chairman, the
Vice Chairman shall perform the various duties until such time the P&Z
Board shall elect a new Chairman and Vice Chairman.
C. Other Presiding Officers
The members of the P&Z Board may select an additional member to preside over the
meeting(s) in the absence of the Chairman and Vice Chairman
D. Board Coordinator
1. The board coordinator shall be provided by the City and be a City employee.
2. The board coordinator shall prepare and distribute agendas, correspondence
and minutes on the Friday before the meeting and shall establish and maintain
files to ensure they are properly kept. All recorded meeting tapes shall be
provided to the City Clerk for safekeeping.
3. Any correspondence prepared by a member of the P&Z Board shall be
provided to the board coordinator for distribution to the P&Z Board members.
E. Professional Support
The City shall provide professional support to the P&Z Board as may be necessary.
ARTICLE V: Meetine:lHearine:s
A. Regular Meetings
Regular scheduled meeting of the P&Z Board shall be held the second Wednesday of
each month.
B. Special Meetings
Special meetings or hearing ofthe P&Z Board may be called by the Chairman.
C. Requirements
All meetings shall be open to the public, provide due public notice, and follow
Roberts Rules of Order and the Florida Sunshine Laws.
ARTICLE VI: Powers and Duties
A. The P&Z Board shall exercise the following powers and duties:
I. Be the responsible agency to initiate review and/or amendments to the City's
Comprehensive Plan and recommend such to City Council.
2. Review all proposed amendments to the City's Land Development Code and
make recommendations to City Council as to the consistency of proposed
amendments to the Comprehensive Plan.
3. Monitor the effectiveness of the Comprehensive Plan by the formal periodic
evaluation process described in Chapter 163.3191, FS.
4. Provide recommendations to City Council regarding applications for the
following:
a. Subdivisions and plats;
b. Development and zoning agreements;
c. Proposed annexations;
d. Proposed rezonings;
e. Site Plans over twenty-five thousand square feet (25,000 sq. ft.) of
building area;
f. Text amendments;
g. Mining agreements;
h. AbandonmentlVacations; and/or
i. Land Use Amendment
5. Provide a coordinated planning effort between the City and the Volusia
County School Board per Florida Statutes Sec. 163.3 1777.
B. The P&Z Board shall have final authority to approve, modify and/or deny, unless
appealed to City Council:
I. Conditional Use Permits
2. Variance Applications.
C. Appeals
Any person aggrieved by the decision of the P&Z Board shall appeal such decision to
City Council in the manner and form required by City Council.
ARTICLE VII: Amendments
The By-Laws may be amended at a regular or special meeting of the P&Z Board,
provided that written notice shall have been sent to each member at least thirty (30)
Ii lleen ( 15) days in advance of the vote, which notice shall contain the proposed
amendment.
Adopted by the Board this
day of
,20_.
, Chairman
Attest:
, Board Coordinator