09-22-2008 - Regular
~~
CITY COUNCIL OF EDGEWATER
REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 22, 2008
7:00 P.M.
COMMUNITY CENTER
MINUTES
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Thomas called the Regular Meeting to order at 7:00
p.m. in the Community Center.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Michael Thomas
Councilwoman Debra Rogers
Councilwoman Gigi Bennington
Councilwoman Harriet Rhodes
Councilman Ted Cooper
Acting City Manager Tracey Barlow
City Clerk Bonnie Wenzel
City Attorney Carolyn Ansay
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
INVOCATION, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
There was a silent invocation and pledge of allegiance to
the Flag.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
There were no minutes to be approved at this time.
3. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/PLAQUES/CERTIFICATES/DON
ATIONS
There were no Presentations to be made at this time.
4. CITIZEN COMMENTS
The following citizens spoke:
Henry Waters, stated he had a problem with Edgewater Towing
Company. He was detained on the 8th by the Police and was
not offered a choice as to who was to tow his vehicle.
Edgewater Towing took it and by the time he got around to
being able to get it out, they wanted so much money his
Page 1 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
benefits wouldn't cover it and they continue to hold his
scooter. He contacted Bishops in New Smyrna Beach and
explained the length of time and asked for a price what
they would have charged and it was less than half as much
as Edgewater Towing. He asked if they had a contract with
the City or if there was an arrangement with them. He felt
that was absurd and ridiculous and that this was too much
of a burden to bear. There is no need for it.
Mayor Thomas asked Sergeant Arcieri if he could address
that. Sergeant Arcieri informed him he would have to do
some research. Mayor Thomas asked him if he knew if they
were under contract with Edgewater Towing. Sergeant
Arcieri informed him yes.
Mayor Thomas informed Mr. Waters he would get somebody to
get with him.
5. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilwoman Bennington had nothing at this time.
Councilwoman Rhodes presented a report on the General
Employees Pension Board. They met twice and they have
hired a Board Administrator, Sheila Hutchinson, who is
going to coordinate the Board actions. They are in the
process of severing ties to Principal based on their
performance comparable to others in the marketplace and are
negotiating a contract with Foster & Foster Actuarial
Services to help in this process. They discussed and made
recommendations on a new rules and procedures manual
prepared by their attorney Mr. Dehner who will now prepare
a final copy to be approved by the Board. They will begin
working on a restatement of the plan that will reflect the
way they are doing business now and changes that need to be
made to comply with new regulations. They have encouraged
all board members to attend the Police/Fire conference
December 1st - 3rd to attend sessions that apply to General
Employee pension plans and a public hearing on
rules/changes that will have a serious impact on cities and
public pension plans if it is passed. They were advised by
Mr. Dehner that it would be well if they went to a public
hearing on that so they could learn about it and help to
not pass it if they deem it is not in their best interest.
Councilman Cooper had nothing at this time.
Page 2 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
Councilwoman Rogers stated in lieu of the economic times we
are in she is starting to receive a lot of phone calls
regarding properties that are not maintained very well.
She is referring those individuals to Code Enforcement.
She wanted to make a public announcement that they should
also refer those individuals to our online website where
they can report if someone is in violation as far as a
property being vacant or abandoned and if it has not been
mowed and maintained.
Councilwoman Rogers stated there are some Statutes
regarding the maintenance of mobile home parks. There is
one in particular she has been talking with homeowners that
own a trailer and they pay lot rent so the property that
surrounds and the property that their trailer is located on
is to be maintained by the mobile home park owners. She
referred to Chapter 723 of the Florida Statutes. This has
to do with the Florida Mobile Home Act and these mobile
home park owners are responsible and they need to be
educated about this so they make sure senior citizens and
some of the snowbirds if they own a trailer and it is in a
park and there are trees that are hanging over their
trailers it is to be maintained and dealt with by the
actual property owner.
Acting City Manager Barlow stated he got a report before he
walked in this evening that the particular piece of
property she received a complaint on is at Sea Horse
Trailer Park. They had Code Enforcement go out this
afternoon and they determined the tree to be healthy and no
hazard to that trailer as well as they provided the report
from the Arborist from the County and/or University of
Florida. They say that tree is a type of hickory tree and
is more vulnerable during windstorms and hurricanes but
there is nothing that indicates that hickory tree is
unhealthy or an immediate threat to the adjacent property
to it.
Councilwoman Rogers asked if that had been conveyed to the
property owner. Acting City Manager Barlow informed her it
had not.
Mayor Thomas commented on the WAV meeting he attended.
They had further discussions on Mr. Visconti's visit with
his rain barrel. They are supporting that idea and are
giving out vouchers through WAV and the County for people
purchasing rain barrels to conserve water. They are trying
Page 3 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
to get into the educational system teaching our future
generations how to conserve water. To conserve water they
have to educate the public.
Mayor Thomas stated the health Department came and gave
them a lengthy discussion and the State of Florida is
cutting a bunch of money. They are trying to levy it back
onto the cities. It is $.95 per hook up per year. He is
tired of the State having these unfunded mandates and
putting it back on the City. He could not support that.
Our share was going to be $IB,OOO and something and it was
going to be up to the City to collect it. He voted not to
support it.
6. CONSENT AGENDA
There were no items on the Consent Agenda to be discussed
at this time.
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
A. 2nd Reading, Ord. 200B-0-ll - Setting the Final
Millage Rate of $5.9000 mills for real and
personal property and $0.033047 mills for Voted
Debt Service for the City for Fiscal Year 200B-
2009
City Attorney Ansay read Ord. 200B-0-ll into the record.
Acting City Manager Barlow made a staff presentation. He
identified the taxing authority as being the City of
Edgewater, the roll back rate is $6.43B99 per $1,000, the
percentage decrease over the roll back rate is B.37% and
the millage rate to be levied is $5.9000 per $1,000 and
$0.033047 per $1,000 on the Voted Debt.
Mayor Thomas opened the public hearing.
The following citizens spoke:
Dominic Capri a , 606 Topside Circle, stated he was being
facetious a couple of meetings ago when he said they were
looking for the top of the hit parade and that is exactly
what they did. We are now on top of the hit parade, higher
than any city in Volusia County. What bothers him is not
the millage rate they are asking for. He commented on
millage rates in other cities in Volusia County being lower
Page 4 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
than Edgewater. He used New Smyrna Beach as an example.
He spoke of Edgewater not making any progress at all. He
doesn't know how they can reduce it. He was hoping they
would drop it a little more. Let's do it, let's not just
make statements. Let's check into see what they can do.
If he was involved he would do much more homework. He
urged the Council to try. He knows it isn't a lot of
money but with him it is principle.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked if she read in the newspaper that
New Smyrna is taking money out of their reserves. Mayor
Thomas thought she was right. Councilwoman Rhodes pointed
out that New Smyrna has a commercial base that Edgewater
doesn't have. We are trying to get it but we don't have
it. It takes the tax burden off of their citizens. Nobody
on Council wants to pay any more taxes than they have to.
Councilwoman Bennington also pointed out the condos that
New Smyrna has that we don't have.
Mayor Thomas asked if anybody could tell him what the
richest city in Volusia County was. He informed them it
was Daytona Beach Shores because of all of the condos they
have. The people of Edgewater have said they don't want
condos or anything above 35 feet. They want to be a
bedroom community and will have to pay for their quality of
life. If they don't want to be in the bedroom community,
move up there.
Mr. Capria stated they are talking about New Smyrna Beach
and the industry they have. We have had an Economic
Development Board for years. What have we accomplished as
far as bringing tax structure in? They can't compare
Daytona with the high condos verses Edgewater with the
small properties we have. We are a tourist City. That is
all they are going to be. Let's work on those issues for
the tax structure. We are the highest on the hit parade,
which they did not used to be.
Councilwoman Rogers felt they have to deal with this higher
rate. She doesn't like it anymore than Mr. Capria but the
negative is and the reality is we are still paying for some
past mistakes. The issues they brought out at the last
council meeting had to do with ParkTowne. It had to do
with the sale of ParkTowne and there are many issues there.
That is partly being corrected in this budget. We also
have a new Finance Manager who has made things more clear
to them and he isn't smoke and mirrors as their previous
Page 5 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
Finance Manager and City Manager were. That doesn't mean
it is going to be erased and cleaned up over night. It is
going to take a couple of years to do so. She doesn't like
to say just wait and give them a couple years and they will
clean it up but the reality is that is what they are having
to do. She doesn't like 5.9 either but what she doesn't
like more than 5.9 for the City is that they are having to
pay taxes to the County. She feels they need to start
nailing the County. She wouldn't want to live in Daytona
Beach Shores and she doesn't think they are the richest
city due to the condos. She feels if they were to look at
their budget it has to do with a lot more than just that.
She believes with the administration we have now and the
Finance Director we have now, that in the next couple of
years they will start seeing that rate go down. She
doesn't know who will be on the Council but she hopes Mr.
Capria will stay and keep coming forward and the next
people to get on the Council will push to have it lowered
because they won't have any excuses because the problems
are being fixed now. It takes a few years to have
everything go through in this trickle down effect. It will
work itself out. Right now we are having to pay for those
past mistakes.
Councilman Cooper felt they all agreed that they didn't
like going to a 5.9 but on the same token it is a 9.1
reduction from the roll back rate. A lot of work was done
on this. We' are a bedroom community. When they see the
struggles that go on month after month about trying to
bring in light, green, clean, industry to offset the
bedroom community tax base verses industry tax base, it's a
struggle. The Economic Development Board, in the past we
haven't gotten a lot of things. We haven't been the city
to come to. They are working hard. He commented on the
website and there now being a video to try and market
ourselves. He mentioned the new medical center they
approved last month that is coming in and the new bank that
is going up on U.S. #1. Things are changing. That base
isn't in our coffers yet. They are working everywhere they
possibly can to look at every revenue pocket. He spoke of
having to face the huge tax cut the State just passed.
They passed down the cost to the cities and counties. He
spoke of the tax structures that are happening throughout
every City. They were supposed to save $200. By the time
they took everything away from the cities and counties,
they are probably going to save about $40. There are some
shenanigans going on. He spoke of the gas malarkey for the
Page 6 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
last year. The expense for our
alone was humongous this year.
they are working on it.
added diesel and gasoline
It is being addressed and
Councilwoman Rogers stated our State Revenue Sharing
figure, she wasn't sure what the amount was but felt by it
coming down that affects approximately .35 of our millage.
That is probably one of their biggest factors as well as
the fiasco with ParkTowne. Thank goodness that is just
about over with except for the debt we will still be
carrying. She believes that all they can do is go forward.
Mike Visconti, 316 Pine Breeze Drive, stated Governor Palin
of Alaska did away with property tax. He wasn't saying do
away with the property tax. He suggested they cut the
property tax in half and raise the sales tax so everyone
pays part of the taxes. People that don't own property
will pay tax on sales items. Right now they get all of
their money from the property tax. The people that own
property don't want to have the burden of paying the tax
for Edgewater. He suggested getting the other people
involved who don't own property and yet pay the sales tax
on the items they buy. He wasn't saying grocery items. He
was saying other things so they can make up the tax they
lose from the half of the property tax with the sales tax
and take half of the burden away from the property owners.
Councilwoman Rogers would have a problem with that because
she feels that would discourage people from coming to the
City of Edgewater to buy things. The person that will be
hurt will be the business owner.
Mayor Thomas stated they don't have a choice on that
anyway.
Councilwoman Bennington stated last fall they were
presented with approving a special taxing district for fire
so if they wanted to enact it so everybody would be charged
the same amount so they could lower their millage rate.
They could have lowered their property taxes but they would
have had to use that and they were accused then by
approving the resolution that they were going to use it and
in effect really raise everybody's taxes. Nobody has
thanked them for trying to keep their taxes down the best
they can. They are very conscious of the taxes. They are
all taxpayers in this City and have a vested interest in
this City. They don't want to tax people out of this City.
Page 7 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
They want to be able to lower the taxes and that is one of
the reasons they didn't use the special taxing district.
Mr. Visconti commented on the property owners paying the
bulk of the tax. If somebody goes to buy a pair of shoes
and they pay one penny more for the pair of shoes they get
more taxes.
Mike Armento, Vista Palm Drive, commented on ParkTowne and
other things that didn't work out. He feels they have to
look outside the box a little bit to make more money to
come into the town. Maybe building a community for older,
retired people that are on fixed incomes where you have a
bus to drive them shopping and take them to the store to
bring more money into the town. By bringing more people
here is where they are going to get more money. They have
to look outside the box. He spoke of ParkTowne and nothing
coming in. If they build a community for the older,
retired people all they really need is the hospital and
doctors down here and the dentists. They will have more
money coming into the City. They won't have to build
schools because they will be retired. Maintenance will go
by what they make on their income. Instead of having these
houses built up allover the place, they could have one
community for all of the retired people on fixed incomes
and bring more people into the City itself and that way
they will get more money coming in and will spend their
money in our city.
Councilman Cooper asked if he was talking about nursing
homes, assisted living facilities and limited care facility
senior centers. Mr. Armento informed him not basically
that. A lot of older people can take care of themselves.
Councilman Cooper commented on having a developer that he
has been talking to that is looking to put up a very large
senior village, where they would go from apartment to condo
type living, to assisted living facility to skilled nursing
facilities. That will be a big deal if it comes.
Mayor Thomas agreed with Mr. Armento's out of the box
thinking. His thought was they have the river and they
have the biggest red fish in the world. He commented on
the Battle of the Badges Fishing Tournament. He has never
seen so many people. He commented on the people that came
from out of town that spent their money and went home.
Page 8 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
Acting City Manager Barlow commented on the Vision Process
that the Council had gone through as well as many members
of the community. The Council was looking at different
ideas as well as citizens and looking to diversify the tax
base. Without a doubt staff is not proud that we are at
5.90 and the highest in the County. Staff takes that
personal as well. We are unfortunately not proud that we
weren't number one but we were number two that took the
biggest hit as it relates to Amendment 1. It came through
at 13.5% reduction in our revenue. Deltona was number one.
He stated New Smyrna's taxable value is over $4 billion of
taxable value. Edgewater's is $980 million. We are
required to provide the same level of services to a similar
population base with quite a substantial decrease in
taxable value. Staff is going to continue to work to shave
that millage down.
Councilwoman Rhodes stated it takes them twice as much
money to run a City the same size. She feels Edgewater
does really well.
Justin Kennedy, 1005 Fernald Street, thanked the City
leaders for working in very difficult times. He pointed
out Governor Palin was able to cut the property tax rate
because big oil pays the bills there and as they all know
they are making the money these days. It is tough to make
that comparison. He didn't feel it would be productive to
raise the sales tax in Edgewater. The citizens have to
understand these are difficult times. He looks around
Edgewater and he says to himself if he wants to cut his
taxes, which he would love to, what would he give up? What
are they going to not give up? He commented on having very
little capital improvement that the City has brought them
for the same reasons that these people are telling them
all. It is not a lie. Do the math. To compare them to
New Smyrna is not really fair. If they all look at their
individual households, it costs more money to run his house
than maybe some others or it may cost others more money to
runt heir house than it does for him. As Tracey pointed
out, New Smyrna has a $4 billion tax base. How many
million-dollar homes does New Smyrna have? To suggest that
Edgewater is going to be that any time soon is
argumentative. He stated thanks guys for working with some
really hard numbers. It's tight, it's tight for all of
them. The best thing they can do is look forward and try
to make things better. He thinks they are doing a good
job.
Page 9 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
Jim Lopata, Sea Horse Mobile Home Park, stated as he walked
in he thought they were bringing up the issue about the
tree.
Mayor Thomas informed Mr. Lopata they were talking about
the millage rate and that he would have to wait for citizen
comments.
Mayor Thomas closed the public hearing and entertained a
motion.
Councilwoman Rogers moved to approve the second reading of
Ordinance 2008-0-11, Setting the Final Millage Rate of
$5.9000 mills for real and personal property and $0.033047
mills for Voted Debt Service for the City for Fiscal Year
2008-2009, second by Councilwoman Bennington.
The MOTION CARRIED 5 - 0 .
B. 2nd Reading, Ord. 2008-0-12 - Adopting the Final
Budget and providing for appropriations and
effective date for the City for Fiscal Year 2008-
2009
City Attorney Ansay read Ord. 2008-0-12 into the record.
Finance Director McKinney went over the three minor changes
that were made to the budget. They received a proposal
from the MPO that the 30th Street sidewalk project, that we
qualify for federal funding if we came up with a match of
$167,000 out of an over $600,000 cost to do the 30th Street
sidewalk. He modified the Fund 331 budget and Fund 116
budget to account for an $80,000 transfer from the Sidewalk
Fund in Fund 116 over to Fund 331, also reducing by under
$80,000 the road-resurfacing program. An opportunity such
as what we received from the MPO doesn't come along very
often so he didn't think Council would disagree with
staff's recommendation to do that.
Councilman Cooper stated this fell under the new matching
rate program. It used to be when you had a project
approved by the MPO it was a 50/50 match. They have
lowered that and now the MPO is 75% and ours is 25%. This
was a win-win for all of us.
Page 10 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
Finance Director McKinney stated also within Fund 331 they
have received word and validated by the State who last week
inspected our fuel tanks out at the Public Works compound
that we are in fact going to have to replace single wall
tanks that are located at Public Works. They were under
the impression they were dual wall. That must be done in
the next couple months in order to be in compliance with
the EPA otherwise they will receive penalties for the
single wall tank. They also received word from the
insurance carrier that they are unable to insure these
tanks. This is something of importance that must be dealt
with immediately in case there was a leak of some sort.
Finance Director McKinney stated in Fund 444, on our five
year CIP that he provided to Council, we have received from
Quentin Hampton, who was working on a five year
infrastructure improvement plan for our water and sewer
facilities and he has updated the next four years of the
five years. He didn't change anything for the 08/09 but he
did update 09 through 2013. No impact in the current year
budget. The only other change involves our capital outlay
within the Leisure Services Department. They received
quotes back on their vehicle that they were wanting to
acquire and had over an $8,000 savings between the vehicle
and the one mower, they had enough money left over that
they can just squeeze in a second mower that is badly
needed. The total outlay, cash wise, did not change at
all. They still had $600 remaining.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked where he took the money from.
Finance Director McKinney stated everything came from the
roadway resurfacing program on the tanks. It was $450,000
to begin with. He took less than $80,000 for the sidewalk
and then $125,000 for the fuel tank. That is an item that
they cannot ignore. He can take it from another area.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked if that would be lessening our
Reserve Fund. Finance Director McKinney informed her no.
He went on to explain that the $715,000 prior year
appropriations were reappropriated to sidewalks and fuel
tank.
Councilwoman Rogers stated he mentioned leftover ParkTowne
and asked how much money. Finance Director McKinney
commented on this going back to the transfer from General
Fund when they sold the ParkTowne land.
Page 11 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
Councilwoman Rogers stated when she hears left over money
and she knows in February 2009 we are going to receive our
final debt payment of approximately $1.2 million and they
are going to have a balance of $800,000 debt so they are
going to owe $800,000 and he is telling her tonight there
is money left over. That doesn't equate to her. If we
have money left over why are we going to have debt in
February 2009 after that final debt payment? Finance
Director McKinney pointed out this is what they spoke
about. He shared the entire left over carry forward for
all funds. Councilwoman Rogers confirmed he was
reiterating what they did last time. Finance Director
McKinney stated they discussed it in the workshop and the
first public hearing.
Acting City Manager Barlow further commented on the grant
for the 30th Street sidewalks.
Mayor Thomas opened the public hearing.
The following citizen spoke:
Bill Glaser, 1703 Needle Palm Drive, stated he thought he
heard the Finance Director mention on occasion that our
fuel bill has increased, like doubled to somewhere around
$600,000. He has come down here on numerous occasions
inquiring about why it is that city trucks use Needle Palm
Drive as a City truck truck route. He has gotten all kinds
of excuses over the years. He and Mr. Garmon went out and
did a little measuring and they found that the truck route
between Mango Tree, 16th Street to Hibiscus to the Boulevard
is a 1/10th of a mile shorter than it is if they use Needle
Palm to go between 16th Street and the Boulevard and then
they go west and then they go east. He has asked the
question to the supervisor of the trash folks at the time
that it was a 1/10th of a mile shorter and the answer he got
was well you measured it, did you. Yeah he and Mr. Garmon
measured it and it is still 1/10th of a mile shorter then if
they use Needle Palm. With fuel what it is, he was
wondering why it is it wouldn't make sense for City trucks
to use the truck route? We have had 18, 20, 22, 24 City
trucks on the street in a day, 1/10th of a mile, that is a
couple gallons of gas or a gallon of gas. The garbage
trucks get 2 ~ miles per gallon. It's not much money but
at least they would actually be saving something. What he
sees is the City employees, excuse the term, urinating away
their tax dollars. For three years he has been asking how
Page 12 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
much it costs to do a brake job on a garbage truck.
time they run the street, they are getting an extra
It takes 685 horsepower to stop a garbage truck.
Every
stop.
Mayor Thomas closed the public hearing and entertained a
motion.
Councilman Cooper moved to approve Ordinance 2008-0-12,
adopting the Final Budget and providing for appropriations
and effective date for the City for Fiscal Year 2008-2009,
second by Councilwoman Rogers.
The MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
C. Res. 2008-R-12 - Modifying the schedule of
costs/fees associated with Chapter 19 (Utilities
and Services)
City Attorney Ansay read Res. 2008-R-12 into the record.
Acting City Manager Barlow made a staff presentation
regarding changes to the utility rates.
Councilman Cooper asked if the rate increases were included
in Finance Director McKinney's figures in the budget they
just passed. Finance Director McKinney informed him they
were.
Councilwoman Rhodes stated if you have more than three cans
of garbage to be picked up they are going to be charged $3
per can. Why? How much more does it cost to pick up four
cans as opposed to three cans? You are right there and
aren't spending any more for gas. She didn't understand
the reasoning behind it.
Acting City Manager Barlow explained it gives them the
ability to do that on regular large households that
traditionally have that. If you occasionally set out a
third can, you usually don't get that. It also costs more
in the tipping fees. We pay Volusia County on how much
garbage we take to the landfill and that is all based on
weight. That is an effort to try to bring more
equivalency.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked if this was for residences.
Acting City Manager Barlow informed her businesses also.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked about businesses utilizing
Page 13 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
dumpsters. Acting City Manager Barlow informed her not all
of them do.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked if there are a lot of residents
that have more than three cans. Acting City Manager Barlow
commented on businesses on Guava and Hibiscus that utilize
the City's services and do not have dumpsters.
Mayor Thomas mentioned having allowances for times like
Christmas when people have more trash.
Interim Director of Environmental Services Brenda Dewees
commented on this applying to a typical residence that
always has four or five cans.
Councilman Cooper commented on looking at the problem they
have where a lot of our snowbirds are only here part of the
year and even though they suspend service we have a rather
large minimum service charge to those residents. He
noticed they didn't reflect any of that in the resolution.
He was one of the ones that asked to have that addressed.
That turns out to be one of our bad debt collection things
they never get. He asked if they should have addressed
that here and maybe set some fixed prices on something they
can work with.
Finance Director McKinney stated that portion is what they
were having Jim Shira do. They only took the rate
increases for water, sewer, refuse and stormwater into
account. The whole methodology between not charging
refuse, that is being looked at by Jim Shira, whether to
charge the base fee or not if there is no one in the house.
Councilman Cooper confirmed this is something that would be
coming up later. Finance Director McKinney informed him it
would, which is what was agreed upon by himself, Brenda and
Council at a previous date.
Acting City Manager Barlow commented on some of the
challenges associated with this.
Councilman Cooper mentioned this being revenue they have
been utilizing and spending for years. It's a double edge
sword. It is a sizeable rate and we have a lot of bad debt
on the books that come from this. It is going from $48 to
$52.10.
Page 14 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
Councilman Cooper stated he took their figures and took his
water bills and they never match. Finance Director
McKinney explained this is the rate sheet that the previous
City Manager/Finance Director had his staff do. They have
gone in and made sure what has been approved by Council is
reflected in this resolution and will be reflected on the
bill that is due October 17th. As soon as the rates are in
place, he is working with Tiana that the base verses
consumption is split out.
Mayor Thomas opened the public hearing.
The following citizens spoke:
Dominic Capria, 606 Topside Circle, stated it is amazing
that they can see they want to compare to other close
cities but they don't want to compare other close cities to
the tax structure.
Bill Glaser, 1703 Needle Palm Drive, stated he was noticing
with great interest during the July and August meeting
where they discussed this about the rate increase for the
permit or license for businesses and there was much whaling
and gnashing of teeth going on because they were raising
the folks $5 or $10 per year. He asked if they knew what
they have done to the residents of Edgewater. They are
average and use about 5,000 gallons of water a month. He
figured it up and it will be $2.20 for the water, $1.85 for
the sewer and $2.15 for the trash and recycling. It comes
out to $6.20 and you knock $.50 off the reclaimed water so
it is $5.70. That is every month. He further spoke of not
raising the fees for the businesses but raising the fees
for the residents. He didn't understand it. Businesses
get to write all of that stuff off. That is the cost of
doing business. Homeowners don't get to write that off.
They just have to suck it up.
Justin Kennedy, 1005 Fernald Street, stated he has been a
landlord in Edgewater for 10 or 12 years one of his bones
of contention is the water bill has to be in his name. He
understood the City's position to protect themselves by
keeping the water bill in the homeowners name and that
gives the City some teeth on the deal. He respects that
and understand that from that perspective. On the flip
side, as a landlord and essentially a business owner in
Edgewater, it puts a burden on him that he doesn't share
the same teeth that the City does. They can lien his
Page 15 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
houses and get paid. There is no doubt about it. when the
tenant moves out and leaves him with a $265 water bill.
There isn't much he can do. He can charge a tenant a
deposit up front but the average in his houses when they
leave costs him about $4,000 to get it back on the market.
The extra $200 he is going to get from the tenant for the
water bill deposit doesn't help. He would argue that the
city could collect that deposit and they would have the
history and collect the deposit based on the average usage
of that house, much like FPL does, and they would have a
way to cover their losses if they don't pay their final
bill. If the deposit becomes short, they could send a
notice that they are going to have to anti up more deposit
money. The tenant leaves his house and goes two miles down
the street and he has a new water account courtesy of his
new landlord. He is the one that gets stuck on the hook
after he has had to evict him, which is now $300. On his
way out he turns the hose on and runs his water bill up to
$500 or $600 and he still has no protection. As a
landlord, he looks at himself as a businessman and in the
City of Edgewater it is kind of a tough way to do business.
He is all about being fair and he doesn't want the City to
expose themselves any more than they have to. He feels
there could be a meeting of the minds between the landlords
and the water department in terms of the deposits. He can
also argue from a tenant's right to purchase services. He
has leased houses allover the State of Florida and has
always been able to get his own water. When he moved to
Edgewater as a renter, he can't buy water. He doesn't
think that is fair. If he doesn't own property, he isn't
worthy of buying water.
Councilman Cooper stated this was brought up and he has had
conversation with Acting City Manager Barlow as well as
former City Manager Jon Williams. He was all for letting
the rental person get their own water bill and having a
sizeable deposit. The feedback from landlords at that time
was they would keep them from being able to rent their
property. He agreed as a businessman he thought that was
improper. They can still shut it off before it becomes a
$500 or $1,000 bill.
Mr. Kennedy asked if he was saying that now his new
perspective tenant has a balance with the City and can't
rent his house. Councilman Cooper informed him let's say
the new tenant comes in and the City has a $300 deposit for
them. It would have to be that amount because they do run
Page 16 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
that water like that. The feedback was not to do that
because they wouldn't be able to rent to anybody. Mr.
Kennedy stated he would like to get their names and have a
discussion with them. A consensus in terms of people that
came to a Council meeting and talked about it a real
consensus where they could get all the landlords in the
room and get a show of hands.
Councilwoman Rhodes commented on having this discussion at
several Council meetings over the years. Mr. Kennedy
stated he was told today it has never been brought up.
Councilman Cooper would love to do it the way Mr. Kennedy
was recommending. Councilwoman Rhodes didn't agree. She
stated why should she pay somebody else's water bill. Mr.
Kennedy informed her she wouldn't. The City would collect
a deposit to take care of it. She felt a $300 deposit
would be prohibitive. The landlord is getting the benefit
of the property. Mr. Kennedy stated and the City is
getting the benefit of the water sale. Councilwoman Rhodes
stated the City of Edgewater and the taxpayers aren't
getting any rent money. Mr. Kennedy stated but they are
getting water revenue.
Acting City Manager Barlow stated it has been on for about
20 years and he didn't know that it would heal itself yet.
He suggested they let staff work on that as a goal this
year and maybe there is an opportunity to go into a two
tier approach. Where they take a deposit and are more
aggressive on shut off but on a second tier if they exceed
the consumption over their deposit it gives them an
opportunity to lien the property. That could be something
they could work out with the rental properties so it helps
protect them as well as it helps protect the City. He
doesn't want to get in the business where the City has to
screen his tenants.
Councilwoman Bennington stated when it gets slower, she
suggested they have workshop with the landowners and the
Council. Mr. Kennedy felt that was a great idea. Acting
City Manager Barlow cautioned them because they would
quickly be outnumbered and ran over pretty quick. Mr.
Kennedy stated they would promise to be civil and look at
both sides of the picture. Councilwoman Rhodes felt maybe
they could come up with a couple or three options and maybe
approach the landowners as to which they would prefer.
Councilwoman Bennington stated and which would be
Page 17 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
acceptable. Mr. Kennedy stated whoever wants to do that
they could contact him and he would be happy to work with
the Council on this.
Mayor Thomas closed the public hearing and entertained a
motion.
Councilwoman Rhodes moved to approve Res. 200B-R-12,
modifying the schedule of costs/fees associated with
Chapter 19 (Utilities and Services), second by Councilman
Cooper.
The MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
Mayor Thomas called a ten-minute recess at this time. The
meeting recessed at 8:09 p.m. and reconvened at 8:20 p.m.
Mayor Thomas moved Item 7E up on the agenda.
E. Res. 2008-R-11 - Endorsing the Transportation
Conceptual Thoroughfare Plan and requesting
inclusion of the Plan into the Volusia County
MPO 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan
City Attorney Ansay read Res. 2008-R-11 into the record.
Acting City Manager Barlow made a staff presentation.
Ferd Heeb, 115 N. Riverside Drive, commented on the
presentation he and Councilman Cooper made at the Oak Hill
Commission meeting. Only three of the five Commissioners
were present. They didn't feel comfortable taking action
with three of them but they informed them all three were in
favor of it. He felt they were going to get a positive
response from Oak Hill.
Mr. Heeb
Plan for
being a
future.
MPO.
explained the map of the Conceptual Thoroughfare
Southeast Volusia County. He commented on there
need to alleviate the traffic on U.S. #1 in the
They want to get this in the 2035 plan with the
Mayor Thomas asked for Council comments and stated they
have already been over this.
Councilwoman Rhodes stated this has been a long time
coming. She knows Mr. Heeb has been expressing the need we
Page 18 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
have for this for a long time. She absolutely agrees with
him.
There were no public comments.
Mayor Thomas entertained a motion.
Councilwoman Rhodes moved to approve Resolution 2008-R-ll,
endorsing the Transportation Conceptual Thoroughfare Plan
and requesting inclusion of the Plan into the Vol usia
County MPO 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan, second by
Councilman Cooper.
The MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
D. 2nd Reading, Ord. 2008-0-04 - Adopting the
Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) for the City's
Comprehensive Plan
City Attorney Ansay read Ord. 2008-0-04 into the record.
Acting City Manager Barlow made a staff presentation.
Councilwoman Rhodes felt they did a really great job and
she knows it was a lot of work. Mr. Lear thanked the
consultants that helped them out with that. He recognized
Janet Shira and Erin Boyington. Mayor Thomas thanked them
also.
Due to there being no comments, Mayor Thomas opened and
closed the public hearing and entertained a motion.
Councilwoman Rhodes moved to approve Ord. 2008-0-04,
adopting the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) for the
City's Comprehensive Plan, second by Councilwoman
Bennington.
The MOTION CARRIED 5 - 0 .
E. Res. 2008-R-11 - Endorsing the Transportation
Conceptual Thoroughfare Plan and requesting
inclusion of the Plan into the Volusia County MPO
2035 Long Range Transportation Plan
This item was discussed before Item 7D.
Page 19 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
8. BOARD APPOINTMENTS
There were no Board Appointments at this time.
9. OTHER BUSINESS
A. SA-0802 - Earthquake Magoon's requesting a
Special Activity Permit for their annual
Biketoberfest Oyster Roast
Acting City Manager Barlow made a staff presentation.
Mayor Thomas asked for public comment.
comment at this time.
There was no public
Councilman Cooper moved to approve the Special Activity
permit for Earthquake Magoon's to allow them to have their
annual Biketoberfest Oyster Roast, second by Councilwoman
Bennington.
The MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
B. Request to have Quentin L. Hampton Associates,
Inc. prepare a Wastewater Facility Plan
Interim Director of Environmental Services Brenda Dewees
made a staff presentation.
Brad Blais, Quentin L. Hampton Associates, Inc., further
commented on the details of the Wastewater Facility Plan as
well as the process. He mentioned the Wastewater Plant is
the area that currently needs the most immediate attention.
The improvements that are needed are quite expensive. They
are probably looking at $5 or $6 million in short term
needs.
Councilman Cooper confirmed that Mr. Blais was saying that
without the survey we couldn't be up for the funding. Mr.
Blais informed him the facility plan is a document that is
required to get into the system. There needs to be an
engineering report performed and a financial analysis done.
Councilman Cooper questioned the Scope of Services,
Wastewater Collection/Treatment/Disposal Item #1. He
understands that Restorations, part of their program is to
build a Wastewater Utility Plant out there on their plans.
He also understood it would behoove them and save them a
Page 20 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
giant chunk of change if Edgewater could expand its plant
to service those folks. It just might be a compatible
arrangement if their survey says they can do that if they
do this, this and this. If they are going to save Mr.
Mears project and millions of dollars to do this, is there
discussion that he would be willing to cover our share of
this expense rather than the City accumulating another huge
debt service for an area they know they need to expand and
address. Can they kill two birds with one stone?
Acting City Manager Barlow stated absolutely there would be
conversation. He has talked to Brad about possibly those
opportunities. That is part of this report, to evaluate
the pros and cons of a second plant there verses expanding
that one. They are going to discuss that with our
engineer. Certainly just like any other development they
pay their fair share. There will be those conversations on
what it takes to either relocate some facilities out there
to make room for expansion. Those certainly will be passed
on.
Councilman Cooper stated he also understands his project
mayor may not go forward after the November vote. His
thought was he might even be willing to go this $48,000
survey fee. He was wondering if they should table this
until after November and see what kind of negotiations they
come up with before they drop another $50,000 in surveys
but yet he doesn't want to lose the money. While they have
some negotiations to be done here, he would like to look at
every avenue before they jump in.
Acting City Manager Barlow stated that is only a very small
piece of the survey. Whether his development occurs or
doesn't occur and even based on that vote and what the
judge has ruled, it could be several years before that is
worked out. This study is still needed for those mandated
and required enhancements and/or improvements to our
current operating Wastewater Plant.
Councilman Cooper asked if he thought it was a negotiable
area. Acting City Manager Barlow at this time no. The
survey still has to be done and based on the future
expansion that is going to be mandated by that type of
development that is where he will be paying for his fair
share cost of that. This survey needs to be done for the
current residents that are utilizing this facility as well.
Mr. Blais added when he referenced the potential $5 or $6
Page 21 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
million for improvement projects that is not for additional
capacity. That is just basically to maintain what the City
has. By the time this is done the plant will be almost 20
years old. They have had equipment out there running 24/7
that is designed to last about 15 years and they are going
past that 15 years.
Councilman Cooper commented on having it in the Scope of
Services. Mr. Blais stated that is a piece of this and
that certainly is something they have been talking about.
There are a few elements as far as transmission and a lot
of different cost and non-cost factors to look at. Staff
has directed them to look very closely at that and compare
the costs.
Mayor Thomas asked how many Wastewater Facilities we have.
He was informed one. If that breaks down we don't have
plan B. There is gong to be a lot of unhappy people in
Edgewater. Acting City Manager Barlow stated it hasn't'
been given the attention it could have been given in the
past. They are trying to plan forward so they aren't
reacting to something that occurred yesterday. That is
what this plan will help them do.
Councilman Cooper stated it gets them back to the long
range planning and putting money aside for capital
improvements on our plants and our infrastructure and they
know they have been bad about that. He would like to try
and negotiate with Mr. Mears is all he was saying.
Acting City Manager Barlow stated those conversations still
occur with Mr. Mears.
Due to there being no further comments from Councilor the
public, Mayor Thomas entertained a motion.
Councilwoman Rhodes moved to authorize Quentin Hampton
Associates to prepare the Wastewater Facility Plan and
authorize the notice to proceed to be executed by the
Acting City Manager, second by Councilwoman Rogers.
The MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
C. Florida Power & Light - Request for utility
easement for additional transmission lines
Page 22 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
Mayor Thomas stated there was two representatives present
earlier and they are postponing the work for over a year so
they asked to pull this from the agenda. He asked for a
motion to do so.
Councilwoman Bennington moved to pull this request until
they hear from Florida Power & Light to resubmit it, second
by Councilwoman Rhodes.
The MOTION CARRIED 5 - 0 .
D. Request to approve Lease Agreement with Dex
Imaging for lease purchase of copier equipment
and maintenance throughout the City
Mayor Thomas stated he thought most of them received phone
calls on this. The Acting City Manager has requested they
pull this from this month's agenda and they are going to
put it on the next meeting.
Acting City Manager Barlow stated before he committed to a
date certain, he wanted to dig into it. If it is
determined by staff that they have to complete the entire
process again, then it may take them a couple meetings.
Councilwoman Rhodes disclosed she didn't receive a phone
call and didn't know what Mayor Thomas was talking about.
Councilwoman Bennington made a motion to grant the City
Manager's request to pull this, second by Councilwoman
Rhodes.
The MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
E. Construction Management Agreement with Willie
Wood Construction Inc. on the renovations of the
existing building for the City Animal Shelter
Acting City Manager Barlow made a staff presentation.
Councilman Cooper asked Leisure Services Director Jack
Corder if it fell in his budget. Mr. Corder informed him
they estimate approximately $240,000 going into this
project. This amount will be deducted from that and they
will move forward. They are doing direct purchase so they
can save money on this. That is why he is only bidding as
the construction manager for the project.
Page 23 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
Acting City Manager Barlow explained this is a contractor
that essentially is almost like a temporary employee as far
as managing the project that will work side by side with
Jack Corder. Jack is going to be the purchasing agent so
we have an opportunity to save on some of the supplies.
Councilwoman Cooper asked if they are going to do all the
work. Acting City Manager Barlow informed him Willie Wood
would subcontract out the subcontractors and everything
else. Jack will only be the purchasing agent. It is a
partnership. They have done this with some other projects.
Most recently was the concession stand at Hawks Park. He
asked what the savings were by going in this direction.
Mr. Corder informed him they saved between $60,000 and
$70,000.
Councilwoman Bennington stated by doing it like this, this
allows people to donate materials. Mr. Corder stated it
will be much easier to track donations by doing it this
way.
Councilwoman Rogers mentioned not having the contractor
markup on the material and also depending upon how our
policies are as far as tour accounts that would be set up
with the vendors, perhaps they are going to be able to
share and receive those discounts if we pay early on
materials and things like that.
Councilwoman Bennington stated the contract doesn't have a
time frame and they promised December 25th. Mayor Thomas
asked if they were still on track. Mr. Corder stated they
are still on track. He just hadn't filled it in until they
actually sign the agreement. At the pre-bid they were told
Christmas was the deadline. They said it was tight but
they thought they could do it.
Councilwoman Rhodes confirmed that December 25th was the
date they were going to put in the agreement. Mr. Corder
informed her that was what they were shooting for.
Due to there being no further comments from Councilor the
public, Mayor Thomas entertained a motion
Councilwoman Bennington moved to grant the Construction
Management agreement with Willie Wood for the renovations
of the Animal Shelter, second by Councilwoman Rhodes.
Page 24 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
The MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
10. OFFICER REPORTS
A. Ci ty Clerk
City Clerk Wenzel had nothing at this time.
B. City Attorney
City Attorney Ansay presented an update on the west of 1-95
case. The case has been appealed to the 5th District Court
of Appeals. The original appeal was brought by ECARD and
then Hammock Creek also cross-appealed. As of today they
all had to submit written filings as to whether or not they
wanted to see the matter expedited by the Appellate Court.
All of the landowners said they wanted to see it expedited.
ECARD said there was no rush and they didn't want to see it
expedited. She filed something on behalf of the City
stating that on behalf of the City they felt it should be
expedited as well because to the degree it is resolved
before the election it will clear all of the issues up for
everyone. They asked the Court to get it done for that
very reason and they feel it will be helpful to the voter
when they vote on the four proposed Charter Amendments and
not knowing which one is legal and which one is illegal, it
is going to cause confusion. She guessed within the next
few days they would receive a ruling from the 5th on whether
or not the appeal will be expedited which would mean
everybody would have to file their briefs and papers as
such that the Court could get oral arguments and a decision
made by the first week in November. Based on what she saw
she would predict they will but she shouldn't make
predictions. They did also send out today an order that
the case would not go to mediation. In all appeals now
they try to determine whether mediation can resolve the
matter so it doesn't have to go to the Court. This is a
case where there is nothing really they are disagreeing on
that can be resolved in mediation so they entered an order
saying that that won't slow the process down. Typically
Appellate Courts look at election cases pretty seriously
and try to move them forward quickly. She anticipated by
the next Council meeting she would have a greater update
for the Council.
Councilman Cooper stated he hadn't read the appeal but he
was assuming they went after having this removed from the
Page 25 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
Amendment ballot. City Attorney Ansay informed him ECARD
appealed the decision by Judge Rouse, the lower court
decision, declaring their ballot measure to be illegal.
The Judge said it violated State law in several respects.
When Hammock Creek cross appealed, they were appealing two
points of the Judge's ruling, the fundamental point of
putting it on the ballot and they are also appealing the
one argument the Judge did not buy, which was the measure
was vague, misleading or otherwise confusing. The Judge
said he didn't think it was that. He invalidated it on
other grounds. Hammock Creek or Restoration is appealing
those two grounds and ECARD is appealing all of the reasons
why the Judge said it was illegal.
Councilman Cooper stated so if Hammock Creek wins, will it
be repealed from our ballot voting in November. City
Attorney Ansay stated at this point it will be on the
ballot no matter what. What Ann McFall has told her is
they have up until the actual day of the election to
program their computer systems to not count votes. If
ultimately the decision is that it is illegal and should
have never gone on the ballot it will still actually appear
on the ballot. The people will be voting for something
that won't be counted. She thinks it would be fine if that
were the only proposed Charter Amendment on the ballot in
November but her big concern for the City is they have a
total of four and three others that are legal and
completely unrelated to this. She feels in the final
analysis they are going to have some skewed results on
those because this has been thrown into the mix. It is
what it is and they have been ordered to do it by a Judge
and so they have done it. At the end of the day the answer
is if the Court upholds the Judge's ruling it would not be
counted. If the Appellate Court were to say Judge Rouse
was wrong and it is completely legal and it should have
been on the ballot, it is on there and can be counted.
Mayor Thomas expressed his appreciation to Acting City
Manager Barlow for his endeavors in the Visioning Process.
Not only do we have a City Manager that is reactive,
reacting to problems that are occurring now, but he is
proactive because he is looking into the future and trying
to address those problems.
C. City Manager
Page 26 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
Acting City Manager Barlow thanked the citizens, the
boards, the staff and the Council. They put a lot of hard
work into the Visioning Process. This is just the
beginning. For those of them that have the opportunity to
help guide and shape the future of Edgewater, this will
hopefully be what they did the last two weekends in this
room. He looks forward to being part of the future of
Edgewater. He thanked everybody for their contributions.
1) Tentative Agenda Items
11. CITIZEN COMMENTS
The following citizens spoke:
Jim Lopata, Sea Horse Mobile Home Park, stated he walked in
late and he heard the firemen Steve with Code mention that
his hickory tree that is over his mobile home is not a
safety threat. When they came to look at this tree today,
he gave them a copy of an inspection report from the Arbor
Care Service and he said he inspected the 22" tree as
requested and found the tree is healthy at this time.
However, due to the lean of 35% or more and due to the poor
root structure and the liability it presents to human life
and property he can only recommend the tree be removed. He
doesn't understand how somebody from Code or the Fire
Department can make a comment to Council that it's not a
safety issue.
Councilwoman Rhodes stated the way they understood it the
County Arborist also looked at it. Mr. Lopata stated he
told him right the County Arborist. He has a copy of that
too. Councilwoman Rhodes stated so they have two arborists
with conflicting views. Mr. Lopata stated he's not an
arborist. That was just a note they put in. They went
over to talk to the man. He is a master gardener. Whether
he is a certified arborist he didn't know however he
mentioned leaning hickory tree with branches leaning over
mobile home. The tree also has some falling branches. Mr.
Lopata also showed him this tree and he showed him the
letter and he showed him the ISA Arborist on its condition.
He told him to constantly monitor the tree but he told him
to notify the mobile home park owner in writing and he did
with a certified letter about his concerns about safety and
potential damage to his property and life. They say it's
not a safety issue. He says it is. The master gardener
also said these trees hickory trees in winds are
Page 27 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
susceptible, one of the highest trees of falling down. It
is more than 1/3 of the way over. This tree is towering
roughly 90 feet in the air over his mobile home. If it
falls down onto the meter where there power is and this
starts arching on their mobile home and they try to make a
dash out are they going to get electrocuted on the way out
because of this tree?
Councilman Cooper asked what the bottom line was that he
was asking. for. Mr. Lopata informed him they would like
the park people to remove it. They are even willing to pay
$300 towards the removal. He had a tree guy look at the
tree and he said it would probably be $1,000 to $1,200 to
have it removed. The park people told him they don't like
to hire professional people.
Acting City Manager Barlow explained this is a
landlord/tenant issue. He referred to Florida Statutes
Chapter 723.022(2), which states "Maintains buildings and
improvements in common areas in a good state of repair and
maintenance and maintain the common areas in good state of
appearance, safety and cleanliness." This is extremely
subjective. Both arborists say the tree is leaning and
there is a potential. Both trees are healthy. They City
has looked at it and they manage many of these cases.
There are times they deem they are an immediate life safety
hazard and they march them before the Code Board and the
City pays to have the tree taken down and we lose those
costs or lien the property to recoup those costs later.
There is also many issues which end up being a
landlord/tenant issue that Code is drug into to mediate or
try to manage in a civil matter.
Councilwoman Rhodes stated her dad has a huge hickory tree
in his yard and it drops nuts on his roof all the time.
It's never blown over yet. It might not be as immediate as
he thinks it is. To remove that tree, would they not have
to get a tree permit to do that? Acting City Manager
Barlow stated if it goes before the Code Board, if they
determine and side with Mr. Lopata that it is an immediate
life safety hazard the Code Board can direct the City go on
there and take care of those that are an immediate hazard
and either lien the property or pass that off to the owner.
That could also be challenged and if they go on there and
make alterations or improvements to his landlord's property
and they determine it is not, they could counter sue the
City for damages they have done to their property.
Page 28 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
Councilwoman Rhodes asked if the landlord's position was he
wasn't going to remove the tree because the City said it is
healthy. Mr. Lopata stated the Code people have not talked
to the park managers. They have been on vacation the last
two weeks of August and they came back the first of
September to collect the rent, they cashed them on the 5th
and went back on vacation. There is no manager in the
park. They see the Park owners approximately seven hours
in a month's time. Councilwoman Rhodes stated they
obviously get their mail somewhere. She asked if he had
written to them. Mr. Lopata informed her they got the
certified mail he sent them but never responded. They know
his phone number but will never call back. Every year this
tree goes another eight feet. Next year it will probably
be 100 feet. It is getting top heavy.
Councilwoman Bennington asked how long the tree had been
there. Mr. Lopata stated probably on a guess 60 years.
Councilwoman Bennington has four hickory trees in her yard
that lien like that that have been there for over 30 years
and when the wind blows you would swear they are going to
fall. Mr. Lopata stated this one has been here twice as
long so it is probably twice more likely susceptible to
going over. Councilwoman Bennington stated she hasn't had
one of them go yet. Mr. Lopata stated that is why he hired
an arborist and he told him it is dangerous. Councilwoman
Bennington stated potentially. Mr. Lopata said he says
it's not, he's not an arborist. Councilwoman Rhodes asked
if the man that said it is dangerous would be the one to
cut it down. Mr. Lopata said he does that type of work
also.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked Mr. Lopata if he received back
that the landlord received the certified letter. Mr.
Lopata said he got the green card back. Councilwoman
Rhodes stated and he hasn't responded to him. Mr. Lopata
stated no.
Councilwoman Rhodes stated unfortunately it sounds like a
landlord/tenant issue. She didn't see what the City could
do about it. Mr. Lopata stated they don't want to spend
any money. Councilwoman Rhodes stated they can't make
them.
Mr. Lopata asked about the Florida Statues on the Mobile
Home Act. Does this mean this is law? Councilwoman Rhodes
Page 29 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
informed him it sounded like he had a great court case.
The City isn't a court. Mr. Lopata stated what are they
going to wait until the tree falls on his mobile home and
kills them. How can he go to court if he gets killed? How
is he going to collect on his insurance if he gets killed
in the mobile home because this tree is a danger? Even
though he has insurance, they aren't going to collect if
they get killed.
Councilman Cooper asked Acting City Manager Barlow if the
City would have any ramifications one way or another about
issuing a permit to have this tree removed as it stands
right now. Mr. Lear asked how big the tree was.
Councilman Cooper informed him 22". Mr. Lear stated he
would have to get a regular tree removal permit.
Councilman Cooper informed Mr. Lopata they weren't saying
they would refuse the permit. If he wanted a permit and he
applied he would get it. The City won't stop him. Mr.
Lopata stated he can't say he wants the tree cut down. It
is up to the park owners. It is their tree. If he cuts
that tree down they will probably sue him. All of the
Council together said the City couldn't do it. Mayor
Thomas informed him this is a civil matter.
Councilman Cooper informed Mr. Lopata the landlord would
have to remove the tree so his argument is directly with
them. The City won't refuse the permit to have it removed.
Mr. Lopata said they are the ones that will have to put in
for the permit. It is their tree.
Councilwoman Bennington informed Mr. Lopata he needed to go
to civil court and force his landlord to remove that tree.
Councilman Cooper stated somehow he needed to get in front
of the landlord and get his problem remedied. Mr. Lopata
said they will tell him to get more insurance. When he
told them about the tree leaning they said what did he want
them to do straighten it up? He told them no and that he
would like them to cut it down.
Justin Kennedy, 1005 Fernald Street, wanted to ask a
question about the ECARD suit. He stated so it will be on
the ballot and when time lapses through the election and it
is still in the courts. Let's say the election takes place
and is in favor of the City or Hammock Green, can they take
that election and drop the case. If the election results
are favorable does that nullify the case from the City and
Page 30 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008
Hammock Green's perspective? City Attorney Ansay explained
from the City's perspective yes. From ECARD and the
interested land owners, probably not. She thinks at this
point they are both concerned about the issue potentially
resurrecting itself again. There is a legal precedent here
that she thinks at least to some degree ECARD is pushing or
the counsel for ECARD is pushing. These are issues she is
trying to get resolved because she does this in other
places and to test the waters. She didn't know that it
would be dropped. She thought they would want to get a
ruling from the court. She couldn't speak for them.
Mr. Kennedy said if the vote falls in the City's favor, the
amendment would not be added at this election. City
Attorney Ansay stated she can make the argument either way
if it passes or fails at the ballot box, it will still not
be added to the Charter because they can't add something
that they have been told by a court of law is illegal
already. Until a court reverses that determination and the
citizens' vote in favor of it, then it could go in the
Charter.
Mike Visconti, 316 Pine Breeze Drive, commented on Tracey
Barlow and what he is doing with the vision for the future
of the City of Edgewater. He is very disappointed and
wanted to say shame on the citizens of Edgewater for not
taking more interest in the future of Edgewater. He
counted 52 people at the first workshop. He counted 33
people at the second workshop and these are the people that
are making the decisions for the future of Edgewater.
Eighty people out of a population of 20,000. He said shame
on the citizens of Edgewater.
12 . ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to discuss, the meeting
adjourned at 9:10 p.m.
Minutes submitted by:
Lisa Bloomer
Page 31 of 31
Council Regular Meeting
September 22, 2008