09-05-1991 Special
.~.
.
Q
o
~I"} . , I
C::../ ("' (~ "" t.....
'.
CITY OF EDGEWATER
LAND DF.VELOPMENT AND REGULATORY AGENCY
SPECIAL MEETING
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 1991
6:30 P.M.
COMMUNITY CENTER
Ch~irm~n C. Peter Hellsten c~lled to order a special meeting of
the Land Development and Regulatory Agency at 6:30 p.m.,
Thursday, September 5, 1991, in the Community Center of City
H.=lll.
ROLL CALL:
Members present were Mr. Masso, Mr. ~wing, Mr. Fazzone, Mr.
Garthwaite, Mr. Klein (arrived at 6:40 p.m.), Mr. Hildenbrand and
Chairman Hellsten. Also present were Mark P. Karet, Director of
Planning and Zoning and Sondra Meager-Pengov, Secretary.
Nr:W BLJ5INF.5S:
AN-0191 - Victoria
Golfin~: Harvin
requests annexation
located on the west
Roberts Road.
Lakes Golf Community Manufactured Homes and
Clark, authorized agent for Marwin, Inc.
approval for a 450 acre parcel of land
side of U.S. #1, 9/10 of a mile south of
Chairman Hellsten asked Mr.
of the proposed annexation.
Karet to give the Board an overview
Mr. Karet gave a brief description and history of the annexation
that was previously considered by the LDRA and recommended to
Council. He commented that the annexation agreement is very
similar to the one previously approved by the LDRA. A major
change is that the land will be sold to individual property
owners and the concept of a rental community is no longer being
proposed by the applicant. The applicant did this to accommodate
the wishes of the Council. This change substantially improves
the fiscal impact of the proposed annexation. The information
provided by the applicant and reviewed by the acting City Manager
indicates that there will be a surplus of approximately $86,000
per year to the City.
Mary ~Iansen. Attorney. 1620 S. Clyde Morris Rlvd.. Daytona Reach:
Ms. Hansen stated she is representing Marwin, Inc. Ms. Hansen
said the main proposal has not changed, they still propose to
develop 650 homesites. The essential differences are in
paragraph 5 of the development agreement which says the project
will be a subdivision rather than a lot rental community. The
o
o
page -2-
other major change in the development agreement is in paragrarh
10, stating that the landowner will preserve significant natural
vegetative communities present on the property. The landowner
further agrees that landscaping proposed for the project will
utilize native and drought resistant vegetation. Environmental
easements will be established along rear property lines.
Ms. Hansen discussed Council's past concern regarding a rental
community rather than subdivision (lot sales). She feels the ad
valorem taxes received will satisfy the Council. Another
concern was whether or not the City could handle a development of
this size with the present staff in the City of Edgewater. Ms.
Hansen stated she had gone to the Volusia County Council and
they agreed to send a letter assuring the City that the
cooperation of the County is availahle in responding to the
City's questions or concerns.
Chairman Hellsten then opened the meeting
board.
to questions from the
Mr. Fazzone commended the developer and Ms. Hansen for the fine
joh they have done and the information the Board has received. He
then asked Ms. Hansen if the developer was still willing to make
up any deficits the City may have. Ms. Hansen said that the
project was changed to a subdivision to address the concerns
raised regarding a potential shortfall and as a result, the
answer is no.
Mr. Karet added that the shortfall that was projected at the
mentioned Council meeting dealt with annual operating costs to
the City once the property is built out. There was never really
a question in the City's mind that there would be shortfalls
during the period of time that the project was under
construction.
Mr. Hellsten asked Mr. Karet if there was an agreement between
the applicant, the Acting City Manager and himself as far as the
validity of the information submitted by the applicant is
concerned? Mr. Karet replied yes.
Mr. Fazzone questioned the matter concerning the enclave that
will be created. Ms. Hansen said that the County Council has
twice gone on record that they will not challenge the annexation.
She also pointed out the county is the only entity that can
challenge the annexation.
Mr. Garthwaite asked if the environmental easements were across
the western part of the property. Ms. Hansen noted they were on
the west and south. Mr. Clark then showed a map of the area in
o
o
page -3-
question.
Mr. Garthwaite also asked about the area set aside for a new fire
station. Ms. Hansen said three acres is the total size of the
parcel with at least one acre of developable land.
Chairman Hellsten opened
comments.
the discussion
to
the public
for
Mr. Wilbur Sikes, Volusia County Property Owner - Mr. Sikes asked
how the development WrtS going to affect Liza Clinton Road. Mr.
Clark stated the development will have no affect on the road.
Doris Hill, I_incoln Road - Ms. Hill stated she is heartily in
favor of the proposed subdivision. She thinks the City should
take advantage of the opportunity to have a golf course
community.
Mr. Ewing
unilateral
agreement.
stated he thinks the annexation agreement looks like a
agreement. Ms. Hansen said this is not a unilateral
Chairman Hellsten stated he thinks before any aLtion is taken on
the agreement it should be reviewed by the new City Attorney. Mr.
Karet stated that this would be done without question.
Mr. Ewing asked if impact fees will cover costs.
yes, they must cover costs under state law.
Ms. Hansen said
Mr. Ewing asked whether the development will reduce assessments
for the sewers in Florida Shores. Mr. Karet replied, that the
project will not affect assessments, however, the development may
reduce the need for future rate hikes.
Mr. Ewing's stated that the proposed annexation area is all swamp
area. Ms. Hansen showed a layout of the area showing the
wetlands and upland areas. It was noted that approximately a
quarter of the site are considered wetlands.
Mr. Ewing read building permit figures for the past four or five
years. The figure from April, 1990 to April, 1991 showed a
decline in building permits, because of this he feels the
developers are being very optimistic in planning build out of the
golf commLlnity in five to eight years'. Mr. Karet said the point
brought out by Mr. ~wing, is precisely why staff thinks this
annexation is good for the City. The impending Capital
Improvements Program will significantly slow development in
Florida Shores. He noted that growth in the proposed development
..
. .
o
Q
page -4-
will offs~t the slowing of growth in Florida Shores. He stated
growth provides funds to th~ City in terms of r~venue sharing and
gas tax and the like. He also noted that other communities that
have not been growing as fast as predict~d have lost money from
the state.
Mr. Fa77on~ moved to approve th~ annexation of th~ golf course
to the City of Edgewater with the stipulation that: 1.) the
annexation agr~em~nt be gone over by the new City Attorn~y 2.) to
urg~ the new City Attorney to get in on the ground floor for the
deve 1 orment agr~ement with 'Mr. Karet. Sec-onded by Mr. Gar thwa i te
Motion CARRIFD 5-2. Mr. Klein and Mr. Ewing voted no.
AJ}J'OI JRNMF.:NT :
There being no further business to come
motion was made and seconded tn adjourn.
at 8:05 p.m.
before th~ ag~ncy a
The meeting adjourned
Minutes Resrectfully Submitt~d by:
Sondra Meager-Pengov, Secretary
Land Dpv~lorment and Regulatory Agency
/SMP
ldramin/090591