Loading...
05-23-1990 , r .. ~ Y. u Q CITY OF EDGEWATER LAND DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATORY AGENCY REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, MAY 23, 1990 6:30 P.M. COMMUNITY CENTER Chairman C. Peter Hellsten called to order a regular meeting of the Land Development and Regulatory Agency at 6:30 p.m., Wednesday, May 23, 1990, in the Community Center. ROLL CALL: Members present were Mr. Bennington, Mr. Fazzone, Mr. Garthwaite, Mr. Hellsten, Mr. Klein and Mr. Hildenbrand. Mrs. Blazi was excused. Also present were Mark P. Karet, Planning and Zoning Director, and Beverly Kinney, Secretary. OLD BUSINESS: SP-8917 Boyce Industrial Park West Marion Avenue: It was noted that Mr. Boyce, property owner, was not present to discuss this item with the Agency. Mr. Karet stated the Agency had previously approved the site plan, but the applicant wants to build and receive certificates of occupancy in phases. Mr. Karet stated that staff recommends approval of the phasing. Mr. Boyce has agreed to put in all utilities during phase I of the project. There was discussion as to whether the request for phasing of the project constituted an amended site plan. There was discussion about water retention as it pertains to Shangri-La Village. There was also discussion about providing a landscape buffer in accordance with the recent amendment to the landscape ordinance. Mr. Hellsten requested a motion to applicant, or authorized agent moved, seconded by Mr. Bennington. table this item until the is available. Mr. Fazzone so Motion Carried 6-0. L.D.R.A. Draft Ordinance: The proposed draft ordinance amending ordinance 88-0-11 and updating of the Code of Ordinances as it pertains the Agency was discussed. Mr. Karet stated the changes were made to the draft as per the Agency's request. Mr. Bennington stated that Section 715.02, Site Plan Approval, should also require Agency approval for a change of use prior to the issuance of a building permit. The Agency discussed wording in Section 1105.00, Reconsideration of Denied Rezoning Applications. It was agreed that the second (2nd) paragraph would stated that the "agency shall not consider a petition for any other kind of zoning or any part of the same property for a period of ninety (90) days from the date of such action." Mr. Klein stated he did not like the fact that an alternate can be the fourth (4th) member to make a quorum and vote on development actions, because an item could be approved on a 3 to 1 vote. He added that it should require a 4 to 0 vote. Mr. Klein moved to strike wording which states that "in all other business a majority vote of the members present, and the alternate if a member is absent, will prevail except as specified herein," and replace with new wording reading "No recommendation for any action may be made unless four (4) members concur." The motion died for lack of a second. Mr. Fazzone moved to accept the above, seconded by Mr. Benn i ng.ton. Klein voting no. draft with the changes listed Motion Carried 5-1, with Mr. 1 i'~ ~ Q Comorehensive Plan: Mr. Klein and Mr. Hellsten stated that this issue was a mute matter. Mr. Karet stated that the Council was made aware of the Agency's displeasure in the amount of time allowed prior to making a recommendation. Mr. Karet informed the members there had been some changes regarding densities, floor area ratios for industrial and commercial land, and some changes were made to the Future Land Use Map to cover estuarine related vegetative cover. There was discussion regarding the number of comprehensive plan amendments that are permitted each year, and Mr. Karet stated that there may be two opportunities this year, depending upon whether the Department of Community Affairs (D.C.A.) finds the city in compliance. Mr. Karet stated that D.C.A. would have forty-five (45) days to respond. There was discussion among Bennington regarding the Council approved to forward to D.C.A. the members and meeting where Councilwoman the plan was Mr. Klein moved Agency members. the copies made. moved to hold any available. Mr. Klein to have copies of the document made for the Mr. Fazzone seconded. Mr. Karet agreed to have A roll call was not taken. Mr. Bennington further discussion until the copies are seconded. Motion Carried 6-0. DISCUSSION ITEMS: Mr. Karet stated that Barrett were appealing the Council. the Kane minor decisions made subdivision and Perry by the Agency to the Mr. Karet informed the members that work was beginning on the land development regulations, and he was meeting with the City Manager and Mr. LaRue of LaRue Planning and Management Services, consultant, next week. He added that he had already talked with York Phillips, growth management consultant. Mr. Karet stated that the applicants for the Carol-Ann Drive annexation has withdrawn their application. There was discussion about the need to have one (1) document showing working standards for development, which will happen because of the comprehensive plan. Mr. Karet also stated that the city was currently developing an operations manual which will provide a consistent policy throughout the city. Mr. Bennington discussed the problem Karet stated the Code Enforcement problem. of outdoor display. Mr. Officer is working on the There was discussion regarding the status of the Huntley Jiffey Store located on S.R. 442. There was discussion regarding the recent Council action which placed the building department under the fire department. There being no further business to come before the Agency, Mr. Bennington moved to adjourn, seconded by Mr. Fazzone. The meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m.. Land Development and Regulatory Agency Regular Meeting May 23, 1990 Minutes respectfully submitted by: Beverly Kinney 2