Loading...
05-27-1982 r'" . ' ., , . . , A"'- , o o CITY OF EDGEWATER Citizen Code Enforcement Board Public Hearing and Regular Meeting Minutes May 27, 1982, 7:00 p.m. Chairman Prater called the Public Hearing to order at 7:09 p.m. in the conference area of the Community Center. Mrs. Shirley Mason and Mrs. Lois Kane were sworn in as 3-year members by City Attorney Henderson. ROLL CALL Members present: Messrs. Prater, Hamel, Williams, Holahan, Mrs. Kane, Mrs. Mason. Excused: Mr. Ed Hall. Also present: Chief Baugh, Mr. Henderson, City Attorney~ Mrs. Taylor9 Secretary. Public Hearing Case 82-CC-ll - Sheila Lloyd, 2719 Yule Tree Drive, ~e: Ordinance 604, Section 712 Chief Baugh was sworn in by the secretary. He noted that the two vans on the property appeared to be used for storage and passed around a picture showing the vans and debris between them. Chief Baugh said that Mrs. Lloyd had indicated to him that she would be at the hearing, but she did not show up. After some discussion of the legality of serving Mrs. Lloyd only, the following action was taken. Moved by Mr. Holahan, seconded by Mrs. Kane, and UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED, to give Mr. and Mrs. Lloyd notice to comply within 7 days from receipt of the notice. If they are not in compliance after 7 days, a $25.00 per day fine will be imposed. The Public Hearing was closed at 7:32 p.m. and the regular meeting was called to order. At 7:34 p.m. Mr. Lloyd arrived, stating that he thought the meeting was scheduled for 7:30 p.m. He apologized for being late. Moved by Mr. Holahan, seconded by Mrs. Mason, and CARRIED, by a 4-2 vote, to reopen the Sheila Lloyd case, No. 82-CC-ll, for further hearing. Mr. Lloyd was sworn in by the secretary. Chief Baugh explained to Mr. Lloyd what had taken place before he arrived at the hearing. Mr. Lloyd said he was using the one van for storage of motorcycles which he kept for spare parts for use in his motorcycle rental business. The other van was used solely for spare parts, most of which had been removed. The vans had been stored in his yard approximately two years. Mr. Hamel suggested Mr. Lloyd should reorganize his garage to make space for storage of the usable parts. Mr. Lloyd agreed that he could have the vans removed from his property in 30 days. M 0 ve d by r4 r. Ham e 1, see 0 n d e d b.Y Mr. W ill i am s, and UNA N I M 0 U SLY CAR R I ED, to give Mr. and Mrs. Lloyd 30 days from May 27, 1982 to comply, and if at the end of 30 days they are not in compliance a $25.00 per day fine will be imposed. The Public Hearing was closed at 8:04 p.m., and the Regular Meeting was called to order. Regular Meeting APPROVAL OF MINUTES Moved by Mr. Holahan, seconded by Mr. Hamel, and UNANH10USLY CARRIED, to approve the minutes of April 29, 1982, as submitted. '" .ta A ,I .. , ~ . o o OLD BUSINESS Case 82-CC-3 - Jack Sparks, 2716 Mango Tree, Re: Section 7-325 Mr. Holahan told the members that he had been to the Sparks property just a few days previous to the meeting and asked permission to take pictures of the fence. After reviewing the photos it was decided that the fence could be considered to be in compliance, if Mr. Sparks would fasten the loose end of the fence to the house. It was noted that the letter to the City Manager dated May 4, 1982, recommending the Council look into the possibility of adopting a Swimming Pool Code had not yet gone to Council. Moved by Mr. Hamel, seconded by Mrs. Kane, and UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED to send a letter of compliance to Mr. Sparks and close Case 82-CC-3. Case 82-CC-9 - Barbara Marr, 128 Old County ~qad, Re: - Section 717.03. Ordinance 81-0~ Chief Baugh stated that he had been to the property and the property looked super. He recommended Mrs. Marr be was now in compliance. The Chief agreed to provide the In-Compliance form. that in his opinion, advised that she Board with an Moved by Mr. Holahan, seconded by Mr. Williams, and UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED to send a letter of compliance to Mrs. Marr and close Case 82-CC-9. NEW BUSINESS City Attorney Clay Henderson was present to review the new ordinance with regard to the Code Enforcement. He stated that the ordinance, No. 45, is basically a restatement of the present ordinance, except for the changes which take place in the State law. The members were given a copy of the new ordinance and Mr. Henderson noted the changes. If approved by Council the new ordinance will become effective July 1, at \'/hich time a new member will need to be appointed to the Board. The meeting was adjourned at 8:42 p.m. Minutes submitted by: lloan Taylor Citizen Code Enforcement Board Public Hearing and Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 May 27,1982 . ' . ~., ,,1' , ...., ~ Dat.e "' / / j ri ":1- " "- ~ ~{s q~ ~~ L-. I . '/)1vJ ~..~ ;2.. . ..:---- ......- . / - . ' . I "