Loading...
12-02-1982 . ~ o (J' - .' PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING December 2, 1982, 7:00 PM - . , Mlnutes Chairman Bennington called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM in the conference area of the Community Center. ROLL CALL Members present: Messrs. Bennington, Towers, Hetu. Also present: Mrs. Winks. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Moved by Mr. Hetu, seconded by Mr. Towers, and CARRIED 3-0, to approve the minutes of November 17, 1982. SITE PLAN REVIEW SP-8226, Weaver/Wheaton, Commercial Warehouse, 1518 Industrial Road, I-2 Preliminary/Final Approval Mrs. Wheaton was present to discuss this site plan for a commercial warehouse. The Department Head comments were reviewed, noting that the Fire Department is concerned as to what will be stored in the warehouse. Mrs. Wheaton stated that no chemical will be stored in the building, and at present it will be used for their personal use. Per Mr. Murphy's letter any building valued over $5,000 must have an architect's seal on the plans. Mrs. Wheaton did not have an architect's sealed plan. Moved by Mr. Towers, seconded by,Mr. Hetu, and CARRIED 3-0, to approve Preliminary and Final Site plan Approval for SP~226 with the condition that two architect sealed plans be submitted beforg~ building permit is issued. SP-78, Rev. #3, FEC, Stepp & Upham, Industrial Subdivision, PID Review for Comments Mrs. Winks noted that Mr. Parker Mynchenberg is now the engineer for this project and he had decided not to attend this meeting. A letter was received from him that he would like to know what is needed for Final plat Approval. Mrs. Winks noted that SP-78 had only received Preliminary Approval for Phase I, and the Commission felt that he would have to come back for Preliminary on the entire project. There was a discussion on the entrances to the industrial park. Mrs. Winks asked for the Commissions opinion on whether this proJect should comply with the PID ordinance alone or should it comply with both PID and Subdivision regulations. The Commission- felt that this question should be asked of thelCity Attorney. It was noted that there is a future road shown to connect to New Smyrna Beach. Mr. Hans Wolfer, City Engineer for New Smyrna Beach, stated that New Smyrna Beach is not interested in connecting with a road. / OLD BUSINESS Mrs. Winks read a letter to the Planning Commission from Mrs. Taylor, secretary to the Board of Adjustments, which stated that the special excep- tion for a 24 unit apartment development for Mr. Harold Brown was denied by the Board of Adjustments. Mrs. Winks noted that SP-8223 is now closed. SP-8224, Trolley Car Restaurant, Amended Site Plan Mrs. Winks explained that the site plan had the restrooms in the wrong location concerning setbacks and they are going to move them to meet the 10 foot setback. Mr. Murphy will not inspect the plumbing for them until the Planning Commission approves this amendment to the site plan. Mr. Hans Wolfer was present to discuss this amendment. The Commission felt there was no problem in changing the location of the restrooms. \ Moved by Mr. Towers, seconded by Mr. Hetu, and CARRIED 3-0, to approve Amended Site Plan SP-8224 . u u # SP-8216, George Workman, Building Addition Mr. Bennington noted that he had received a call from Earl Wallace who told him that a permit had been issued for Tommy's Lounge building addition. They have decided to put a bathroom in the front of the building and Mr. Murphy stated that they would have to come back to the Planning Commission for this change. The concensus of the Commission was that this was an interior change and this is not a concern of the Planning Commission. Mr. Murphy will be sent a letter to this effect. Zero Lot Lines Mr. Bennington brought it to the attention of the Commission that a revision to Ordinance 82-0-13 pertaining to Zero Lot Lines was never brought to Council's attention. This change was unanimously approved by the Planning Commission on 5/5/82 with that recommendation to the Council. Moved by Mr. Hetu, seconded by Mr. Towers, and CARRIED 3-0, to recommend to Council that Section 718. Zero Lot Lines, (1) and (5) be changed as follows: (1) The minimum yard shall be the same as for the Zoning Classi- fication in which the subdivision is located or proposed, except that the interior side yard may be zero in the case of structures which adjoin. (5) All parcels are to be equally divided, excluding setback areas. NEW BUSINESS Mr. Bennington mentioned that we have discussed a Tree Ordinance in the past and noted that we now have a copy of the County Tree Ordinance. Mr. Bennington read this ordinance and noted that we should be able to compose our own ordinance similar to this. SP-8227, Gas Lite Square Subdivision Mrs. Winks briefed the Commission on the status of this subdivision and that it would be going to a Department Head meeting before it comes to the Commission for Sketch Plan approval. The meeting was adjourned at 8:08 PM. Minutes submitted by: Deborah K. Winks Planning Commission Minutes December 2, 1982 Page 2