02-14-1983
."
o
o
. -
ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
February 14, 1983, 7:00 PM
Minutes
vice Chairman Cochran called the meeting to order at 7:02 PM in the conference
area of the Community Center.
SWEARING IN OF NEW MEMBER
Mrs. Susan Wadsworth, Deputy City Clerk, was present to swear in Mr. Roman
Sadowski, the new Alternate member.
ROLL CALL
Members present: Messrs. Siciliano, Stewart, Landry, Cochran, Wheeler,
and Sadowski. Also present: Mrs. Winks.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mr. Siciliano stated that there is
of the January 24, 1983, minutes.
B-6 from the special exceptions in
should be deleted from the B-zones
an error in the last paragraph of page 2
He did not discuss removing B-2 through
the I-I zone. He stated that residential
and the I-zones.
Moved by Mr. Siciliano, seconded by Mr. Wheeler, and CARRIED 5-0, to approve
the minutes as submitted and the above change will be noted in the minutes
of the February 14, 1983 meeting.
ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN
Vice Chairman Cochran opened the floor for nominations for Chairman.
Mr. Wheeler nominated Mr. Siciliano, seconded by Mr. Stewart; Mr. Wheeler
moved to close nominations, seconded by Mr. Stewart; upon roll call Mr.
Siciliano was UNANIMOUSLY elected Chairman.
Vice Chairman Cochran turned the Chair over to Chairman Siciliano.
OLD BUSINESS
Mr. Siciliano asked if the required affidavits were received on the
Stuckey rezoning. Mrs. Winks replied that, yes they had all been received.
It has gone to Council, and a Public Hearing will be scheduled. Mrs. Winks
presented the file on this and showed the affidavits to the members. She
stated that the Public Hearing will be published in the paper, the property
posted with a sign, and real property owners will receive a copy of the
notice and it will also be posted in the lobby of City Hall. Mr. Siciliano
questioned if there were other requirements to be met for this rezoning.
Mr. Cochran stated that he felt if you are looking for industry and you
have industrial property, you shouldn't put it back to residential, because
then you don't get the industry. Mr. Wheeler stated that there is very
little industrial property other than the FEC property, and if we keep
rezoning it, where will industry be able to move in. There was a discussion
on the FEC industrial development, and Mrs. Winks said that the engineers
had said they would be coming in this month for Preliminary approval for
the entire project.
Mr. Landry asked about the updating of the Zoning Appendix. Mrs. Winks noted
that it was in limbo because there haven't been any Workshop meetings of the
Planning and Zoning Commission, because of the lack of members.
Mr. S:iciliano.mentioned that the Planning Commission is reviewing Zero Lot
Lines and feels that this is a Zoning matter, not a Planning matter. Mrs.
Winks stated that the duties of each Commission are listed in Sections 14-31
and 14-32 of the Edgewater Code Book (pagesl134 and 1135). Mr. Siciliano
stated that the Zoning Commission should go over the Zoning Ordinance.
He requested copies of the proposed Omnibus Ordinance and copies of the
Workshop work for all the members.
Mrs. Winks also noted that the Zoning Commission was working on annexation
of property south of the City, east of US 1 to the river and west of US 1
to Cow Creek Road, south to Adams Road. The Planning Commission was asked
to help in this work.
.~
~
~o
Mr. Siciliano stated that we would wait and see what the changes to the
Zero Lot Lines section would be. Mrs. Winks noted that the proposed changes
have already gone to Council, and authorization has been given to the City
Attorney to draw up the Ordinance. She noted the changes to Items 1 and 5
of Section 718.00 in answer to Mr. Wheeler's question. Mr. Siciliano feels
that this is not under the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission to
recommend zoning changes to the Council, it should be the Zoning Commission.
Mr. Cochran agreed. Mr. Siciliano feels that the Powers and Duties should
be straightened out and taken to Council.
Mr. Siciliano stated that residential as a permitted use should be taken
out of the business and industrial zoning. Mr. Garthwaite, a member of
Board of Adjustment, noted that multi-family is a special exception in
the business districts.
Mr. Siciliano would like to hold a workshop-type meeting at the regular
meetings when there isn't alot of zoning applications. Starting at the
next meeting, the Zoning appendix can start to be reviewed. Mr. Siciliano
said he would see what work has already been done and plan an agenda to
follow for this work.
There was a discussion on the annexation work that had previously been
done. The Fong/Rankin property annexation was discussed.
NEW BUSINESS
Mr. Landry questioned if there was a specific time period that the Zoning
Commission had to act on rezoning applications. Mrs. Winks stated it was
30 days.
Moved by Mr. Landry, to set up a committee to screen rezoning applications
before action is taken on them. Mr. Cochran seconded this for discussion.
Mr. Siciliano stated that he understands that there really isn't enough
time to investigate all aspects of a rezoning, from the time you pick up
the packet to the next meeting. Mr. Landry feels that a group looking at
the property would be more beneficial than each individual looking at it
by themselves. Mr. Stewart suggested that at the first meeting, find out
what needs to be looked intol and pick three members to investigate it.
Mr. Siciliano questioned whether this would be a violation of the Sunshine
Law. Mr. Cochran stated that the meeting could be continued to the following
day and held at the property for discussion. Mr. Siciliano stated that if
there are any doubts about a rezoning, it should be tabled and looked into
further. Mr. Siciliano suggested that if there is a question on a rezoning,
a Committee be set up at the meeting and a date set when this Committee will
go and look at the property, then this would be public.
Mr. Cochran seconded the above motion. Mr. Siciliano suggested adding
the words "when necessarY"ito the motion. Mr. Cochran suggested that it
be either a Committee of three or the whole Commission. Mr. Landry stated
that this should be added to the motion. Upon roll call the motion CARRIED
4-1. Mr. Wheeler voted NO.
Mr. Garthwaite questioned what an "interior" side yard setback is in the
B-3 zone. Mr. Siciliano stated that he believes it means between two
buildings on the same lot, there would be ten feet from one building to
their side yard and then ten feet from this line to the next building.
Mr. Garthwaite questioned what the word "way" meant under definition of
"Building, front of:". Mr. Cochran stated that it would be a "way" serving
the building. Mr. Garthwaite noted that this was in reference to the
professional plaza being built on US 1 where the two buildin~face each
other.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:19 PM.
Minutes submitted by:
Debbie Winks
Zoning Commission Minutes
February 14, 1983
Page 2