11-16-1981
.
.'
.-
-
l.
2.
3.
4.
5.
o
v
CITY OF EDGEWATER
AGENDA
NOVEMBER 16, 1981
7:00PM
COMMUNITY CENTER
Call to Order, Roll Call, Invocation, Salute to the Flag
Hearings
Approval of Minutes--Meetings of October 19 and November 2,1981
Bills and Accounts
Communications
A. City Attorney
B. Teleprompter TV
C. Building Code Board - Life Safety Code
D. Merit Board
(1) By-Laws
(2) Table of Infractions
E. Joint Pension Board
F. Home Occupation Licenses
G. Planning Board
(1) Condominium Ordinance
(2) Spiering Zoning Request
H. Victor Macino
I. Frank Opal
6. Ordinances and Resolutions
A. 81-R-77 Recreation Impact Fees
B. 81-0-34' Condominiums
C. 81-0-39 Pennants (2nd Reading)
D~ 81-0-40 Diocese Annexation
7. Unfinished Business
A. Police Department - State Grant
8. New Business
A. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
B. Burning Permits
9. Miscellaneous
~.:,,;~,~':~,~;"C~-;,,"~1~J2~:~ll~i~~~'
A \.t. 1t..~;,T,;-J. ...;t:..... ,..',. (I~' lLIC ~'~" ~"-J:'""I ....
t.~ADE: - .~., "- rn....l..c_(}.NlJS IS
10. Adjourn to December 7, 1981.
. -.". .~-_ a_..e~.... ..~.:.....;,.~~~:~.::..~;; '::':";':-::::;::::",=:';$"';:::"
"i
o
EXPLANATORY DATA
NOVEMBER 16,1981
o
5. Communications
B. Teleprompter TV
The attached Doti;ficatjon from Teleprompter TV indicates
that a rate increase is about to be put into effect.
Under your present ordinances (see compilation attached)
the previous councils had- lifted the necessity of having
the council approve rate increases and also altered the
construction time element so that the company is not
held to ~ny particular time schedule. Because of the
interest on this subject by so many of our residents
in Florida Shores, I have invited the local Teleprompter
manager, Mr. Terry Messner, to appear before Council to
explain the company's plans for extending service to
Florida Shores.
C. Building Code Board - Life Safety Code
See attached. The Building Code Board has recommended
unanimously that the Council adopt the Life Safety Code
by reference. Adoption in this manner means that future
changes would be automatically adopted.
D. Merit Board
(1) By-Laws
The Merit Board voted unanimously to recommend
to the Council the adoption of its new by-laws,
attached. These have to do with procedure only
and do not affect policy.
(2) Table of Infractions
The Merit Board has recommended unanimously that
the Council adopt the Table of Infractions,
attached. This would replace items (l),(2), and
(3) <;m page 15 of the existing "Employee Information
Guide Book" (attached).At the present time neither
the employee nor the supervisors have any guide-
lines as to why or how an employee is to be disci-
plined.- This makes the City legally vulnerable in
case of appeals under the: Civil Rights Act or,
for example, appeals under unemployment compens-
ation claims. This table was worked out by and
with the concurrence of ail department heads and
will eliminate-a similar table in the Police
Department's "Guidelines for Establishing Standards
of Disciplinary Actions" which is essentially the
same, but briefer.
"
o
o
Explanatory Data
November 16, 1981
Page two
I
.J
5. Communications
E. Joint Pension Board
At a.meeting held October 27, 1981, by the Joint
Pension Boards, both boards approved unanimously
changes to two vesting conditions. See attached.
The first has the effect of reducing the vesting
period among all employees from 10 years to 5 and
is based on the problem we have in connection with
the age of certain employees versus the fact that
their counting time for 10 year vesting has only
run 4 years. This measure would permit any
employee to be eligible for retirement, under the
existing formula, in 5 years instead of 10. The
cost of this would be $2,051. per year paid from
current funds.
At the same time the boards recommended unanimously
that the vesting period for police personnel in
the event of accidental injury be shortened from
5 years to 0 with no change in formula. The cost
of this would be $1,715. paid from state funds.
I understand that both requests have been pending
for some time and represent the feeling of the
employees and supervisors.
G. Planning Board
(1) Condominium Ordinance (81-0-34)
See attached letter from Planning Board.
This ordinance was referred back to the
Planning Board and the City Attorney at
the Nov. 2 meeting for changes with respect
to recreation impact fees and is related
to Res. 81-R-77 under item 6 of the agenda.
(2) Spiering Zoning Request
See attached. The Planning Board denied
this application on a split vote. At its
meeting of Nov. 11, the board offered to
recommend that the code be changed to grant
a special exception, but Dr. Spiering said
that he wanted a re-zoning. He now states
till a t he . would 1 iketo go ahead with an exception-
see attached.*
6. Ordinances and Resolutions
A. 81-R-77 Recreation Impact Fee
The Planning Board has concluded its recommendations
on a similar portion of the condominium ordinance.
* In order to avoid spot zoning, the Council may wish
to simply extend the B-2 zone westward one block on
either side of Indian River Boulevard.
.
o
o
Explanatory Data
November 16, 1981
Page three
.
6. Ordinances and Resolutions (cont'd)
B. 81-0-34 Condominiums. (
The Planning Board 'is ready with its recommendations.
See Communications 5.G.(1).
C. 81-0-39 Pennants
Second and final reading
D. 81-0-40 Diocese Annexation
The Zoning & Planning Board reviewed this but got hung VP
on site plan information, which should be considered later.
7. Unfinished Business
A. Police Department - State Grant
At the meeting of Nov. 2 you tabled the request by the
Chief of Police to purchase certain items for crime
prevention under a state grant. This is the time to
reconsider.
8. New Business
A. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
It is felt that the present Board of Governors setup
should be revised and named "Parks and Recreation Advisory
Board" and take into account the scope of all recreation
activities in the city, both now and in the future.
The present Board of Governors is highly limited in its
activities and has in fact been discussing mostly the
use of buildings and grounds. This new concept involves
active participation in planning and overseeing all recre-
ation activities within the city and rendering advice to
the City Manager and the City Council on activities .and
funding. The City Manager would be authorized to appoint
a recreation superintendent, part time or full time as
the budget permits, and the board would act as a public
liaison between the various volunteer recreation groups
and the city government with the City Manager acting in
the usual executive capacity. This proposal assumes
rapid and widespread growth in Edgewater which will result
in specific recreation facilities and activity needs of
our youth. The present Board of Governors would be
phased out and a new board, the Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board, established to.replace it.
B. Burning Permits
During the Crane Swamp Fire it became apparent that the
City had no formal way of approving burning requests.
We got calls from m~ny people 'including builders and
homeowners who wanted to do everything from backyard
burning to construction site burning and we discovered
that there were problems because of a lack of clear policy.
In checking with the City of New Smyrna Beach we found
that they had worked this out by ordinance. We are pre-
paring an ordinance which follows closely what New Smyrna
Beach does and will meet the approval of the county fire
marshall as well as the state fire marshall and will give
our staff an authorized and formal way of considering and
granting burning permits. The Fire Company has agreed to
do the work.