11-11-2009
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
Planning and Zoning Board
Wednesday, November 11,2009
6:30 p.m.
Edgewater Community Center
102 N. Riverside Drive
AGENDA
I. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Regular meeting of August 12, 2009
4. OLD BUSINESS- PUBLIC HEARING
None at this time.
5. NEW BUSINESS- PUBLIC HEARING
a. CP A-090 1- Review and Recommendation to the City Council of the annual update and amendments
to the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) and the accompanying Capital Improvement Program
(CIP).
6. OTHER BUSINESS
7. DISCUSSION ITEMS
a. Development Services Director's Report
b. Chairman's Report
c. Agency Members' Report
8. ADJOURNMENT
Pursuant to Chapter 286, F.S., if an individual decides to appeal any decision made with respect to any matter
considered at a meeting or hearing, that individual will need a record of the proceedings and will need to ensure
that a verbatim record of the proceeding is made. The City does not prepare or provide such record.
/n accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons needing assistance to participate in any of these
proceedings should contact City Clerk Bonnie Wenzel, /04 N. Riverside Drive, Edgewater. Florida, telephone
number 386-424-2400 ext. /10/, 5 days prior to the meeting date. If you are hearing impaired or voice impaired,
contact the relay operator at 1-800-955-877/.
Citizen comments are to be limited to five (5) minutes
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
INFORMATION SUMMARY
CASE # CPA-0901
APPLICANT/AGENT: City of Edgewater
REQUESTED ACTION: Amend the Comprehensive Plan to update the Capital Improvements Element (CIE)
and the accompanying Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
Background
The CIE identifies the capital improvements that are necessary for implementation of the Comprehensive Plan
and ensure maintenance and achievement of Level of Service (LOS) standards for concurrency-related facilities,
i.e. transportation, potable water, sanitary sewer, schools, recreation and open space, stormwater and solid
waste.
The Five-Year Capital Improvement Schedule must be financially feasible pursuant to the 2005 Growth
Management Act (Senate Bill 360). Florida Statutes defines that financial feasibility means that sufficient
revenues are currently available or will be available from committed funding sources for the first three (3) years,
or will be available from committed or planned funding sources for years 4 and 5, of a 5-year capital
improvement schedule for financing capital improvements.
Comprehensive Plan Consistency
The amended CIE shall be submitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs and all required local
regulatory agencies after adoption.
Other Matters
The CIE Amendment is exempt from the normal biannual Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends sending a favorable recommendation to City Council for the annual update and amendments
to the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) and the accompanying Capital Improvements Program (CIP).
MOTION
Motion to send a favorable recommendation to City Council for the annual update and amendments to the
Capital Improvements Element (CIE) and the accompanying Capital Improvements Program (CIP).
G:\Planning and Zoning Board\lnfo Summaries\2009\CPA-0901 - CIE.doc
Ci ty of
EDGEWATER
Inc. 1951
City of Edgewater
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 27, 2009 TBD
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRO D U CTI ON ........ ............. ............................. ..... ............................... ............................. 1
A. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS INVENTORy.................................................................. 2
1. Needs Derived from Other Elements............................................................................ 2
2. Existing Financial Resources ................ ........................................................................ 5
B. FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS AND LOANS ..........................................................11
C. LOCAL POLICIES AND PRACTICES ........................................................................... 14
D . FINANCIAL ANALySIS........ ........................... ............ ...... .......... ................................... 19
E. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES ....................................................................... 30
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
A. PUBLIC FACILITIES, CAPACITIES AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE INVENTORY
FOR CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT .......................................................................1
1. Transportation. ......... ............... ........................ ....... ........ ........... ................. ......... .......... 1
2. Sanitary Sewer...... .............. ................................ ......... ........ ............................. .............. 1
3. Potable Water...... ................. ....... ........................... ....... ................................................. 2
4. Solid Waste Disposal.. .... ............. ...................... ........ ........ ...... ........................ .............. 2
5. Stormwater Drainage........... ................................ ................ ...................... .......... .......... 2
6. Recreation And Open Space ......................... .................................................................2
B. CONCURRENCY ASSESSMENT .. .................... ........... ......... .................................. ........3
1. Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage and Potable Water Facilities ........................... 3
2. Parks and Recreation Facilities .....................................................................................4
3. Transportation Facilities .............. ..................... ........... ................................................. 4
IX-i
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPIT ALIMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
C. GENERAL RULES FOR CONCURRENCY ASSESSMENT .........................................5
1. Existing Deficiencies..... ...... ........ ...... .......... ........ ...... ..... ...................... ......... ................ 5
2. Approved Impacts........ ....... ............... .............. ............ ................... ........ ....... ........... ..... 5
3. Phasing......................... ........................ .......................................... ......... ...................... 6
4. Time Specific Approval ......... ............................. .................................................. ......... 6
5. Additional Information................................................... ...................... ......................... 6
6. Transportation................................ ......... .............. .................. ............. ......................... 6
7. Sanitary Sewer.... ...................................................... ...... .................. ...... ...... .................. 7
8. Potable Water......... ......... ............. .... .................. ........ ....... .................................... ......... 7
9. Solid Waste........................................................... .............................. .......... .................. 7
10. Stormwater Drainage ....... ........... .......................................................... ......................... 7
11. Recreation.... ............ ........ ......................................................... ............. ................ ........ 8
D. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES ......................................................................... 8
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 - Capital Improvements Schedule
Table 2 - Volusia County School District Five Year Work Program
Table 3 - Revenue Projections Affecting Capital Improvements
Table 4 - Expenditure Projection for Scheduled Capital Improvements
Table 5 - Debt Service Expenditure Projections
Table 6 - Annual Operating Expenditures
Table 7 - Fiscal Assessment No. 1
Table 8 - Fiscal Assessment No.2
Table 9 - Five Year Schedule of Improvements
Table CM-I-Level of Service Standards
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 - Federal Grant Agencies and Program Titles
IX-ii
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPIT ALIMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) is to evaluate the need for public facilities
as identified in other Elements of this Plan. In addition, the Capital Improvements Element will
present an analysis of the fiscal capability of the City to fund needed public facilities, recommend
financial policies to guide the funding of those identified improvements, and to schedule the funding
and construction of improvements in a manner necessary to ensure that capital improvements are
provided when required.
Needed capital improvements are those which are necessary to meet the adopted level of service
standards identified in other elements of this Plan. The City of Edgewater public facilities which
require identification and funding are:
· Transportation - Roadways which are under the jurisdiction of the City and those roadways
which the City wishes to aid in funding improvements.
· Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element - Sanitary sewer treatment and effluent disposal facilities
necessary to serve the existing and future population of the City. In addition,
recommendations for capital improvements and policies to ensure adequate sanitary sewer
collection facilities.
· Solid Waste-Sub Element - Solid waste disposal facilities to service the City's existing and
future population, coordination with V olusia County to ensure those facilities are available
when needed, and recommendations for adequate solid waste collection methods.
· Drainage Sub-Element - Drainage systems necessary to meet recommended level of service
standards for stormwater quality and conveyance and coordination with Volusia County for
improvements to systems in basins which serve the City but are outside its jurisdiction.
· Potable Water Sub - Element - Potable water treatment facilities necessary to service the
existing and future population of the City. In addition, recommendations for capital
improvements and policies to ensure adequate potable water delivery facilities.
· Recreation/Open Space Element - Recreation facilities and land areas necessary to meet the
recommended level of service standards.
The capital improvements element will also present methods to ensure "concurrency" as defined
and required in Chapter 9J-5.003 and 9J-5.016, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The Element
will also present methods to monitor the "concurrency management system" as defined and
required in Chapter 9J-5.003 and 9J-5.0055, F.A.C.
IX-1
CITY OF EDGEWA TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPIT ALIMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
A. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS INVENTORY
1. Needs Derived from Other Elements
The analysis documented in the preceding comprehensive plan elements have identified facility
improvements needed to meet the existing service deficiencies and those needed to meet the
demands of future growth.
The geographic service areas and locations were identified for major public education and public
health system components. System components whose service areas include the City of Edgewater
are identified in the list in Table 1. The public education system is operated by the Volusia County
School Board, and the public health systems are operated by the V olusia County Health
Department.
The Volusia County School Board presently bases its needs assessments on the findings of the
Edllcational Plant SlIroey, prepared every five years by the State Department of Education in
accordance with Florida Statutes. The last survey was completed in April 2008. The results of this
survey indicated a need for a new k-8 school to be built in the City of Edgewater. The School
Board, based on this report, has acquired a site for this facility along S.R. 442 in the southwestern
section of the City, which is anticipated to open August 2014. Indian River Elementary School will
be adding cleven (11) proposed classrooms to it's location. The remainder of the existing
educational facilities were noted as being in excellent or good condition and were adequately served
by roadways, sanitary sewer, solid waste, stormwater drainage, potable water and recreation facilities.
The State Department of Children and Families (DCF) determines the need for new health care
facilities with a formula based on occupancy rates, historic use by age group, and population
projections by age group. Although Edgewater currently has no full-service hospitals, there is Bert
Fish Medical Center located just outside the corporate City limits that serves the Edgewater area.
Based on growth forecasts a hospital will not be needed before 2020. Halifax Hospice (Unenrl)" has
under construction, a 12 bed patient carc facility located at 1110 S. Ridgcwood k,enue in
Edgcwater. Halifax Hospice. a 12-bed patient care facility. is located at 4140 S. Ridgewood Avenue
in Edgewater.
Individual capital improvement needs identified in this element are, for the most part, those
improvements, which cost $25,000 or more and are generally non-recurring purchase items. The
capital improvements identified in the other elements of this Comprehensive Plan are listed with a
brief description in Table 1 along with their estimated costs and projected year of expenditure. The
improvements are listed by type of service, related to the various elements of the Comprehensive
Plan. As required by Section 9J-5.016, F.A.C., the Capital Improvements Element addresses existing
and future capital improvements needed for at least the first five fiscal years after the adoption of
the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, Table 1 lists improvements identified for the years 2009 2013
2010-2014. Funding sources for these capital improvements are listed in Table 9. Table 2 identifies
the Volusia County School District Five-Year Work Program which must be referenced within in
City's CIE per the Public Schools Facility Element.
IX-2
Table 1
City of Edgewater
Capital Improvement Schedule
Fiscal Years Ending 2009 2013
Projl'l:t Fj~ca] Year Tota]
2OOS-2OO9 2009-20JO 20IlJ-20ll 2011-2012 2012-2013
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Vehicle Reolacement S206,000.00 $300,000.00 $350,000.00 $200,000.00 Sl,056,000.00
12 Lead/ EKG Monitor $25,000.00 $25,000.00
Genisis Extrication Tool System $30,000.00 $30,000.00
Self Contained Breather Apparatus $100,000.00 $100,000.00
Fire DePt. Totals $206,000,00 $lOO,OOO.OO $350,000.00 $lO,OOO.OO $325,000.00 ~
POLICE DEPARTMENT:
Vehicle Replacement S103,616.00 Sl12,00G.OO $81,000.00 S56,000.00 Sl12,000.00 $167,6Hi.00
1_;: --;;- T . .. . S80,OOO.00 S80,000.00
-
I~ ,. ~ - , $200,000.00 $200,000.00
Police DePt, Totals $183,616,00 U12,OOO,OO 581;000,00 556,000,00 $112,000,00 $717,616,00
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES:
Vehicle Replacement S209,750.00 S110,000.00 $770,000.00 $620,000.00 $750,000.00 S2,759,750.00
Wastewater Slio linin\! $200,000.00 $200,000.00
Bar SEreea WWTP $120,000.00 $120,000.00
~~ ~ . ~ " ~ $101,100.00 $2,000,000.00 S2,1 01, 100.00
Retrofit Lift Stationl, 2, +J $70,000.00 $1O,00Q.00 $70,000.00 $180,000.00
2) 25 HP Compressors WWfP S30,OOO.00 $30,000.00
Westeffl Storal!e Tank & Pump Station S130,00G.00 $130,000.00
\mp Rehab/Reolacement $3,000,000.00 $3,000,000.00 $6,000,000.00
2.5 MGD Wastewater Treatment Plant $1,000,000.00 $7,500,000.00 $6,500,000.00 $ 15,000,000.00
SE Service Area Reclaimed Improvements $350,000.00 $5,000,000.00 $5,350,000.00
ART wells 17,18,19,20 $1,210,931.00 $ 1 ,21 0,931.00
Aerator and stairway replacement $200,000.00 S200,000.00
Claricone Painting $100,000.00 $100,000.00
Reolacement of 2" \Vater Lines $10,QQO.00 $10,000.00
Western Reclaimed Water Main Extension $350,000.00 $3,500,000.QO $3,850,000.00
Sliolininl! exisitnl! oioes-Wildwood Subdivision $25,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 S210,000.00 $295,000.00
Eastern Shores Proiect $96,750.QO $96,750.00
Environmental Services Totals $2,378,831,00 $6,305,000,00 $13,370,000,00 $8,lBO,OOO,OO $7,1(iQ,000,OO 537,663,831.00
LEISURE SERVICES:
V chicle Replacement $25,000.00 $68,000.00 $30,000.00 $148,000.00 $271,000.00
,\niffial Shelter $250,000.00 $250,000.00
.. - $183,175.00 $183,175.00
Kennedv Park Rennovations $255,000.00 $290,000.00 $515,000.00
DOl! Park $50,000.00 $50,000.00
Manl!o Lake Park $500,000.00 $500,000.00
Harper Liquid Cooled Dewees Slope Mower $25,000.00 $25,000
Parks and Recreation Totals $688,175.00 $50,000,00 $68,000.00 $30,000.00 5988,000,00 $1,821,175
PUBLIC WORKS:
. -;- -= S65,000.00 $65,000.00
,..., r ,......- -, - $125,OllO.00 S 125,000.00
30th Street Sidewalll $157,716.00 $157,716.00
Road Repavinl! $335,272.00 $150,000.00 $475,000.00 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 $2,260,272.00
Public Works Totals $617,988.00 $515,090.00 $475,000.00 $500,000,00 $500,000,00 52,607,988.00
All Proiects Totals 51,071,610,00 $7,182,000,00 $11,317,000.00 $8,766,000.00 $9,385,000,00 $H,051,610,OO
Source: City of Edgewater Planning Division, 2008.
Table 1
City of Edgewater
Capital Improvement Schedule
Fiscal Years Ending 2010-2014
h~cal )'car
Project 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013.2014 Total
FIRE DEPARTMENT
V chicle Replacement S - S 350,000 S - S 200,000 S 40,000 S 590,000
12 Lead/ EKG Mooitor 25,000 25,000
Genisis Extrication Tool System 30,000 30,000
Self Contained Breather Apparatus 100,000 100,000
Fire Dept. Totals S - $ 350,000 $ 30,000 $ 325,000 $ 40,000 $ 745,000
POLICE DEPARTMENT:
Vehicle Replacement S
Police Dept. Totals $
74,990 S
74,990 $
84,000 S
84,000 $
56,000 S
56,000 $
112,000
112,000
S
$
411,990
411,990
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES:
Vehicle Replacement S 304,500 S 770,000 S 620,000 S 750,000 S 250,000 S 2,694,500
Retrofit Lift Station 1, 2, 2 283,000 70,000 353,000
Western Storage Tank & Pump Station 130,000 130,000
SE Stora 'e Tank & Pumn Station 1,200,000 1,200,000
W\V'TP Rehab/Replacement 3,000,000 3,000,000
2.5 MGD Wastewater Treatment Plant 1,000,000 7,500,000 6,500,000 15,000,000
SE Service Area Reclaimed Improvements 5,000,000 5,000,000
Ammooiators WTP 25,000 25,000
Wells 21-24 and raw water mains 2,300,000 2,300,000
ARTwclls 17,18,19,20 1,800,000 1,800,000
Aerator and stairway replacement 150,000 150,000
Replacement of 2" Water Lines 50,000 50,000
Western Reclaimed Water Main Extension 3,500,000 3,500,000
Wildwood Subdivision - slipliniog 30,000 30,000 210,000 270,000
Undesib'113ted Proiects 250,000 250,000
eastern :lh<)feS I'rolect 680,073 680,073
Environmental Services Totals $ 4,692,573 $ 13,500,000 $ 8,150,000 $ 7,460,000 $ 2,600,000 $ 36,402,573
LEISURE SERVICES:
V chicle Replacement S - S 68,000 S 30,000 S 148,000 S 50,000 S 296,000
Kennedy Park Rennovations 290,000 290,000
Dog Park 50,000 50,000
Mango I.akc Park 500,000 500,000
Parks and Recreation Totals $ - $ 68,000 $ 30,000 $ 988,000 $ 50,000 $ 1,136,000
PUBLIC WORKS:
Road Repaving S 102,000 $ 475,000 $ 500,000 S 500,000 S 500,000 S 2,077 ,000
Signalize SR442 @ 1-95 287,546 287,546
30th Street Sidewalk 157,716 157,716
Public Works Totals $ 102,000 $ 632,716 $ 787,546 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 2,522,262
All Projects Totals $ 4,869,563 $ 14,634,716 $ 9,053,546 $ 9,385,000 $ 3,275,000 $ 41,217,825
Source: City of Edgewater Planning Division, 2009.
Table 2
2009 2013 Volusia County School District Five-Year Work Program
New Construction 2008 2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
"Eyelid Ave. :\It Ed Roplacomont 300,000 3,500,000 350,000
"Marks, George Elm-Replacement School 1,580,000 22,300,000
New Elm "A" Relieve Cypress Creek,~, Chisolm 1,210,000
"Now Elm "Z" Relio'/o Geortjo Marks, 'NooElward, Starke W;G4{),OOQ 1,890,000
New Elm "CO Relieve Pathways, Pine Trail 1,210,000
New Elm "D" Relieve Timbemrost, Volysia Pines, Deltena Lakes 22,000,000 2,100,000
Ne..... Elm "F' Relieve Orange City, Manatee Co\'e, Dob::uy 2,100,000
.New K-8 "FF" Relieve New Smyrna Mid, Indian River, Edgewater 1,800,000 39,500,000
Nelf.' Mid "HH" Rolieve Heritage, Gal3xy 1,800,000
.Ormond Be:::Jch Mid Master PI::m Phaco " 21,870,000 2,000,000
Total New Construction 21,HO,OOO 30;260,000 27,730,000 4,200,000 64,220,000
Major Projects at Existing Schools and Facilities
.Chisolm Elm AElditions/RomoEleling 2,500,000 400,000
Deltona HS-Reroof Campus 2,880,000
Dolton3 Lakos Elm Chiller Systom Bid 8 &. 9 922,000
Discovory Elm HV AC 1,100,000
Enterprise Elm-Classroom Addition 7,000,000 500,000
Indian River Elm Classroom I\ddition 3,238,000 180,000
New Smyrna BOA Mid Doors, Restroomc 610,000
Pine Ridge HS-HV AC Bldg 5 150,000 1,500,000
Pino Trail Elm HIJAC 5,200,000
Portables-Lease 1,100,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 900,000 800,000
Portables- Move and Compliance 711,000 690,000 640,000 590,000 540,000
Se:::Jbroeze HS Renov3to 819g 7 & Air Systom 1 st Floor 900,000
Southwestern Mid-Additions 500,000 5,000,000 500,000
Sunrise Elm-Classroom Addition 180,000 2,700,000 180,000
"Westside Elm I\dditions 1,007,000 0?,?oo
Various Schools-Minor Projects 1,200,000 1,300,000 1,100,000 1,500,000 1,600,000
Various Facilities-Facilities Review Projects 13,7e1,115 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000
ITotal Major Projects at Existing Schools and Facilities 27.175,445 28,150,000 21,120,000 19.497,000 13,520,0001
Facilities Management
Facilities Management-Various Projects 3,650,289 3,759,798 3,872,592 3,988,770 4,108,133
Technology
Network, EDP & Communications Equipment 9.692,350 12,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000
System Wide Equipment and Vehicles
Various Schools & Departments Furniture and Equipment 2,781,002 2,800,000 2,600,000 2,800,000 2,800,000
Total Equipment and Vehicles 2,781,002 2,800,000 2,800,000 2.800.000 2,800,000
Buses
Transportation Dept- Bus Replacement 1,150,722 3,546,028 5,088,615 e,56e,572
Transfers
Transfers- Debt Service 51.637,251 53,10B,170 53, 111,965 53,110,211 56,280,590
Transfers-Equipment Leases & Property Insurance 3,262,350 662,350 662,350 662,350 662,350
Transfers-Maintenance 14,305,000 11,305,000 11,305,000 11,305,000 11,305,000
ITotals 133,943,690 146,496,040 139,H9,955 115,951,946 174,462,9451
Source: Volusia County School District. Work Program Adopted~8 '-Prejests eR appro'les Sales Tax List
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Table 2
2010-2014 Volusla County School District Five-Year Work Program
New Construction
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014
Marks, George Elm-Replacement School ~ 17 682 000
New Elm "A" Relieve Cypress Creek, Soruce Creek, Chisholm ~
New Elm "C" Relieve Pathways, Pine Trail ~
New K-8 "FF" Relieve New Smyrna Mid, Indian River, Edgewater .1.J1Q.QQQ 38 750 000
Pierson/Seville Elm Reolacement 18600000
ITotal New Construction 1,120,000 971,290 77:008,0001
Major Projects at Existing Schools and Facilities
Deltona HS-Reroof Campus 2,880,000
Enterorlse Elm-Addition ~ ~
Enterprise Elm-ll Classroom Addition ~
Friendshio Elm-9 Classroom Addition ~
Hollv Hill Mid-Demo Buildinos !1.Q.QQQ
Horizon Elm-9 Classroom Addition 2,800,000
Pine Ridge HS.HVAC Bldg 5 ll.1.MQQ
Portables-Lease 1,200,000 1,000,000 250 000 ~ ~
Portables-Move and Compliance 690,000 640,000 590,000 540,000 ~
Seabreeze HS-10 Year Soorts Comolex Lease ~
Southwestern Mid-Additions ~ ~ ~
Sunrise Elm-ll Classroom Addition ~
Various Schools-Minor Projects 1,300,000 UQQ.QQ.Q .1..aQQ.QQQ UQQ.QQ.Q UQQ.QQQ
Various Facllities-Facililies Review Pro ects ~ a..oQQ.QQQ MQQ.QQQ MQQJlQQ MQMQQ
Total Major P 's at Existing Schools & Facilities 23,608,422 16,350,000 15,140,000 10,590,000 10,040,000
Facilities Management
Facilities Management-Various Projects 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000
Technology
Network, EDP & Communications Equipment 9,000,000 9,000,000 9,000,000 9,000,000 9,000,000
System Wide Equipment & Vehicles
Various Schools & Departments Furniture & Equipment 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000
Buses
Transportation Dept.-Bus Replacement 7,239,765
Transfers
Transfers-Debt Service 51599110 51 602 925 51601 151 51 598274 57 057 765
Transfers-Equipment Leases & Property Insurance ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Transfers-Maintenance 15800 000 15.800000 1580000 15800.000 15800000
Total Transfers 70,810,360 70,814,175 70,812,401 70,809,524 76,269,015
Totals 108,218,782 100,964,175 100,872,401 96,170,814 184,356,780
Source: Volusia County School District, 5-Year Work Program Adopted 09/15/09
Each capital improvement project is described briefly in Table 1, In addition, the reason for the project
is identified and estimated total project cost is provided. For ease of review, the projects have been
grouped by facility type. As indicated, capital improvement projects have been identified for general,
public safety, sanitary sewer, potable water, drainage, parks and recreation, and transportation facilities,
rX-4
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
It should be noted that the capital improvement projects contained in Table 1 are not inclusive of all the
anticipated capital expenditures by the City during the planning period. Table 1 is limited only to those
major components identified by the preceding elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan (CP) in order
to analyze development impacts and trends at a level of detail which is both manageable and fairly
accurate.
ll1e cost estimates for the capital improvements indicated in this element were developed using standard
engineering practice regarding construction costs, in conjunction with information derived from actual
construction costs of similar projects, certified bid documents on similar projects and engineering cost
estimates conducted on similar projects.
2. Existing Financial Resources
The first step in planning capital improvements, as well as arranging the necessary financing through the
budgeting process, is to inventory the major sources of funding available to the City. These major
sources of funding are expected to contribute a total revenue sum of $21,517,757 $28.796.138 in fiscal
year ;!009 2010. The revenue sources listed below comprises a working inventory for which the City's
ability to fund the needed capital improvements will be assessed. In addition, the current status of each
revenue source currently used by the City is indicated. It is important to note that the list below includes
all of the major financial resources available to the City and is not limited to the funds which will be used
for the capital improvement projects identified in the 5-year Schedule of Improvements included in this
element. These currently utilized financial resources comprise, in part, the revenue sources which will be
used to fund the identified capital improvements projects.
3. Local Revenue Sources
a. Property Taxes (Ad Valorem)
Property taxes are normally based on a millage rate (i.e. one mill equates to $1 per $1000 of assessed
value, or .1 %), which is then applied to the taxable value of all real property, as well as all other
tangible personal property. The revenue from ad valorem taxes may be used to fund both operating
costs and capital projects, unless prohibited by local policies. Provisions at the State level exist for
raising the millage rate above the 10-mill cap set by local referendum for debt service or provision of
municipal-type services within the City.
CURRENT STATUS: As the major source of revenue for the City of Edgewater, ad valorem taxes
normally account for approximately 4+ 40% of the City's annual budget for the General Fund. The
City's current millage rate for the General Revenue Fund is set at approximately ~ 6.36 mills. 111e
expected tax yield for fiscal year;!009 2010 is $5,551,095 $4.968.598 from a tax base (adjusted taxable
value) of $980,595,906 $822.687.956. A level of assessment of 96% is currently used by the City.
IX-5
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
b. Public Utility or User Charges
The revenue from these charges is generated primarily as a result of the rates charged to City residents
of utilization of City-owned utilities such as water, sewer, drainage and solid waste removal! disposal.
Revenue from these operations include user fees, miscellaneous customer service charges and interest
Income.
CURRENT STATUS: The expected public utility revenue for fiscal year WG9 2010 is estimated to be
approximately $12,761,810 $11.950.634.
c. Other taxes, fees and charges
ll1is category of revenue source includes special assessments, various administrative fees and other
charges for using services or facilities owned and operated by the City. Some examples of these
charges are public document sales, property appraisal fees, fines and forfeitures, permit and license
fees, City fund interest income, City property sale income, rental income and all private contributions
(real estate, gifts, donations, etc) to the City.
CURRENT STATUS: Approximately ~ }% of the City's General Fund revenues are generated from
these sources. In fiscal year ~ 2010, the sum of $3,109,156 $382.278 is expected to be generated
by these fund sources.
d. Franchise Fees
The City currently charges a franchise fee (based on the applicable gross revenues charged) for utility
services, which are provided by private companies within the City.
CURRENT STATUS: Approximately f 7.91% of the City's General Fund revenues are generated
from this source. For fiscal year ~ 2010, it is anticipated that $1,003,256 $992.037 in revenue will
be generated from this funding source.
e. Public Service or Utility Tax
A municipality may levy a tax on the purchase of electricity, metered or bottled gas, water, cable
television and telecommunication services. The tax may be levied upon only the purchases within the
municipality and may not exceed ten (10) percent of the applicable payments received by the seller of
the taxable item from the purchaser of the purchase of such service.
CURRENT STATUS: The City currently charges a public service or utility tax on the previously
mentioned applicable and available utility services, with the exception of cable television services. The
City presently charges ten (10) percent of revenues for electricity, gas and water and seven (7) percent
of revenues for telecommunications. For fiscal year ~ 2010, the City anticipates receiving
$1,716,110 $2.068.697 in public service or utility tax revenue, which amounts to approximately +3
16.49% of the estimated General Fund revenue.
IX-6
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPIT ALIMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
f. Special Source of Revenue
Additional funding mechanisms are sometimes required due to the availability of existing revenue
sources and/or the project priorities assigned by the City Council. The options available to the City
regarding alternate sources of revenue for funding capital improvement projects are listed below.
1) System Development of Impact fees. Fees which are charged in advance of
new development to pay for infrastructure needs, but not operating costs,
resulting directly from the new development. The fees must be equitably
allocated to the specific group(s) which directly benefit from the capital
improvements. In addition, the assessment levied must fairly reflect the true
cost of the capital improvements.
CURRENT STATUS: The City currently charges impact fees for water and wastewater services and
for parks. Approximately $40,000 in impact fee revenues (including interest income on fund
balances) are expected to be generated during fiscal year ~ 2010.
g. Special Assessment
Similar to impact fees, special assessments are charged to residents, agencies or areas who directly
benefit from the provision of a new service or facility by the City. For example, the construction of a
gravity sewer system for an existing neighborhood may be financed through a. special assessment to
the neighborhood's individual homeowners rather than through a revenue fund of the City. The
requirement that all of the City's residents fund the new sewer system through a City revenue source
is not considered equitable.
CURRENT STATUS: The City currently has two special assessments in the Florida Shores area, one
for sewer and one for paving. The sewer assessment was started in November 1992 and the paving
assessment was started in November 1994. The long-term debt service associated with the special
assessment bonds is summarized below:
Year General Stormwater SRF Water and Sewer Fund
2009 $900,319 $387,835 $1,811,438
2010 $900,319 $387,835 $1,811,138
2011 $178,320 $161,611 $1,811,438
2012 $1,811,438
2013 $1,811,438
2010 $853.466 $352,872
2011 $443.410 $183,331
2012
2013
2014 $1,627,592
IX-7
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
h. Borrowing
Occasionally, many local governments are required to resort to borrowing funds to pay for capital
improvements due to their extremely high cost. Usually, either long-term or short-term financing is
used to provide these funds. The short-term financing option is normally handled by local banks and
is used to raise the required revenue for periods of one to five years. The more customary method is
to authorize long-term bond issues, which range in length from five to thirty years.
Listed below are several types of bond issues available to the City.
1) General Obligation Bonds. These are bonds which are backed by the full
faith and credit of the local government and are required to be approved by
a voter referendum. Since these bonds are secured by the taxing power of
government, they generally offer lower interest rates than other bonds. The
revenues collected from ad valorem taxes on real estate, as well as other
sources of revenue are used to service the government's debt. General
obligation bonds should be used to fund capital improvements which
benefit the whole City rather than specific areas or groups of citizens.
CURRENT STATUS: The City currently has no outstanding general obligation bonds.
However, the City has $500,000 $425.000 in outstanding general obligation
notes.
2) Revenue Bonds. The revenue obtained from the issuance of these bonds is
normally used to finance publicly owned facilities such as water treatment
and wastewater treatment facilities. The charges collected from the users of
the facilities are used directly to retire the bond obligations. This basically
allows the capital project to be self-supporting. It should be noted that the
interest rates generally tend to be higher than those of general obligation
bonds. Also, the issuance of the bonds may be approved by the City
Council without a voter referendum.
CURRENT STATUS: The City has issued several revenue bonds to fund the improvements to its
water and wastewater facilities. The bond revenues are deposited into Enterprise Trust Fund
accounts for each of the utilities, from which funds are specifically earmarked for a particular project.
User charges are then used to service the debt. The total annual debt service on these bonds is as
follows:
~-201 0
~-2011
~-2012
$2,131,835 $500.000
$2,131,835 $525.000
$2,131,835 $560.000
IX-8
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
~2013
~2014
Total
$2,131,835 $585.000
$2,131,835 $620.000
$10,674,175 $2.790.000
3) Industrial Revenue Bonds. This type of bond, though issued by a local
government, is actually assumed by companies or industries that use these
funds to construct facilities. The low interest rates associated with this type
of bond (due to their tax exempt status) makes it particularly attractive to
industry. The advantages to the local government is that the private sector
is responsible for the retirement of the debt and that the new employment
opportunities are created in the community.
CURRENT STATUS: The City has not issued any Industrial Revenue Bonds.
4. State Sources
The City of Edgewater also depends on annual disbursements from state government to supplement its
revenue sources. The revenue sources discussed above represent those funds generated by City levies
which may be collected and disbursed at the local level. The revenue sources discussed in this section
represent those funds which are: (1) generated locally, but collected and later reimbursed to the City by
the State; (2) adopted as a local option tax or license fee, collected and reimbursed by the State; or (3)
shared by the State in the form of grants to the local government, but originate from State general
revenues. The amounts available from these sources may vary widely from year to year depending on
legislative actions.
a. Revenue Sharing Trust Fund
This component of revenue consists of 1.075 percent of sales and use tax collections, 12.5 percent of
the state alternative fuel use decal fee collections and the remainder from the one-cent municipal fuel
tax. The sales and use tax collections were substituted for the cigarette tax revenues that previously
were used for this fund by the Florida Legislature. The municipal fuel tax funds are restricted for
transportation related expenditures.
CURRENT STATUS: The City anticipates receiving $369,000 $387.545 from this revenue source in
the fiscal year ~ 2010. Of this revenue, 63.8% comes from the sales and use tax collections, .4
percent comes from the user decal fee collections, and the remainder (35.8%) is generated by the
one-cent municipal fuel tax. This revenue source is anticipated to account for approximately 3% of
the City's General Fund revenues in fiscal year ~ 2010.
b. Other Shared Revenue
This category of revenue sources includes several major financial resources which, like the Revenue
Sharing Trust Fund, are shared between City, County, and State agencies.
IX-9
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPIT AllMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
The following taxes and licensing fees generate a large portion of the total annual revenue for the
City's General Fund.
1) Sales Tax - The current sales tax in the State is 6%, and is levied on retail
sales, and such things as commercial rentals, admission fees to
entertainment facilities, and motor vehicle sales. The collection is returned
to the Cities and Counties in accordance with specific formula. The
variables of the formula, in the case of cities, include the population of the
municipality, as well as the total and unincorporated population of the
County.
CURRENT STATUS: The City's portion of the State sales tax is expected to amount to
approximately $900,000 $851.703 in fiscal year ~2010, which represents -9 1% of the City's
General Fund revenue budget for that year.
c. Mobile Home Licenses
Mobile Home licenses currently range from $31.60 to $86.60, depending on what time length is
established in the rate structure. Each City shares in the allocation of the revenues from this source
based on the number of units located in the City. The City in turn shares a portion of the revenue
with the local school board. This has proven to be a relatively stable revenue source over time.
CURRENT STATUS: The City's share of this revenue source estimated for fiscal year ~2010
amounts to approximately $23,000 $20.000 which represents less than 1 % of the General Fund
revenue budget.
d. Local Option Taxes
Currently, there are four (4) possible sources of revenue available to the City within this category. All
of the funds are generated locally, but the funds are collected and disbursed by the Florida
Department of Revenue. The City currently shares in only one (1) of these revenue sources.
CURRENT STATUS: The City's share of this revenue source estimated for fiscal year ~201 0 is
approximately $77,000 $394.512 which amounts to +-,'2% of the City's ~ 2010 General Fund
revenues.
e. Alcoholic Beverage License
The Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco for the State of Florida administers the issuance
of licenses associated with the sale and/or consumption of alcoholic beverages. The State collects in
excess of $37 million annually from this fee. Of this amount, a portion is returned to counties and
municipalities as a state shared revenue.
IX - 1 0
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPIT ALIMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
CURRENT STATUS: The City's share of this revenue source is anticipated to amount to
approximately f7-;GOO $6.000 in fiscal year ~ 2010 which is less than 1 % of the City's General
Fund revenues.
f. Other Sources of Shared Revenues.
The City also receives other shared revenues from both the County and other government agencies.
These revenues include the Motor Fuel Tax Rebate, the Federal Excise Tax, and the County Business
Tax Receipt fees.
CURRENT STATUS: The City's share of these revenues for the fiscal year ~201O are
anticipated to amount to:
a. Motor Fuel Tax Rebate:
b. County Business Tax Receipt Fees:
c. VOCA Grant
d. Street Light Maintenance
e. Other Transportation
f. PS Manatee Mitigation
$-5-;BOO $10.000
$15,000 $12.500
$36,000 $35.000
$24,665
$37,115 $30.000
$5,100
The sum of these revenue sources amounts to less than 1 % of the City's fiscal year 2009 General
Fund revenues.
B. FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS AND LOANS
The system by which federal general revenue sharing was formerly provided (U.S. State and Local Fiscal
Assistance Act of 1972) has been substantially modified. The federal funds are now available through
allocations to the state agencies which administer and monitor block grants or disbursed by federal
agencies as block grants directly to state and local agencies, as well as other eligible organizations and
individuals. The purpose of the block grants program is to allow recipients greater freedom in the actual
funds, though the funds must still be used for projects in specific categories. Since these funds require
the competitive applications be submitted in order to receive an allocation, the grant monies are usually
non-recurring and cannot accurately be projected for annual budgeting purposes.
A partial list of available federal grant sources is shown in Figure 1. Other grants and loans are
administered at the state level, with state executive departments acting as "pass-through agencies" for
federally funded projects. The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) is an example of a
federally funded grant project. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development administers
this program and allocates 70% of its CDBG funds to "entitlement communities", or the larger urban
areas. These communities must apply for grants for financing specific projects from a list of eligible
activities outlined in Title I statutes. These projects include infrastructure improvements, housing
projects, and commercial revitalization. The remaining 30% of the grant funds are allocated to state
pass-through agencies such as the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) in the State of Florida.
DCA administers these grants for the same types of projects mentioned previously, but restricts their
availability to small cities and counties.
IX - 11
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
In addition to block grants, there are several direct loan programs available at the federal level, but their
applicability to capital projects is extremely limited. State loans however, are usually available to finance
capital projects such as land acquisition for low-income housing. DCA administers loans and grants for
these projects to eligible governments through its Bureau of Housing.
CURRENT STATUS:
The City has received a grant from the Florida Recreation Development l.ssistance Program
(FRDAP) in the amount of $200,000 for the Kennedy Park impro-..ements, an ECHO grant in the
amount of $83,175 for the Hawks Park Amphitheater, as well as a grant from Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) in the amount of $87,461 $218.904 for lift station replacement. The City's
Stormwater Fund has received a grant in the amount of $377,000 $473.360 from Florida Department
of Transportation (FDOT) for Eastern Shores stormwater improvements.
IX-12
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
FIGURE 1
FEDERAL GRANT AGENCIES AND PROGRAM TITLES
AGENCY
TITLE
Department of Commerce
Public Works and Development Facilities
Support for Planning Organizations
Public Works Impact Projects
Public Telecommunications Facilities
Construction and Planning
Department of Children & Families
Community Health Concerns
Department of Housing and Urban
Development
Housing Development Grants
Community Development Block
Grant/Entitlement
Community Development Block
Grant/Small Cities Program
Department of Interior
Outdoor Recreation: Acguisition,
Development and Planning
Urban Park and Recreation and Recovery
Program
Department of Transportation
Urban Mass Transportation Capital
Improvement Grants
Urban Mass Transportation Technical
Studies Grant
Environmental Protection
Agency
State Revolving Loan Fund (DFR) Program
Comprehensive Estuarine Management
SOURCE: "Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance", Government Printing office, Washington, D.C.
IX-13
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPIT ALIMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
C. LOCAL POLICIES AND PRACTICES
To guide the location and timing of land development, local policies and practices are used, particularly
in support of the goals, objectives and policies of the Future Land Use Element. Obviously, state
agencies and water management districts which provide public facilities within the City's jurisdiction may
influence these policies and practices. One such influence was found to be generated by the Florida
Department of Transportation (FOOT) 5-year Transportation Plan. This influence stemmed from the
fact that several roadways within the City's jurisdiction are part of the state highway system and therefore
are largely the financial responsibility of the FOOT. Plans for the improvement of some of these
roadways may be included in the before mentioned 5-year Transportation Plan. However, there are
other such roadways not included in the plan. Either scenario affects the capacity of the roadways,
which in turn affects the level and intensity of development, as well as the degree of financial
commitment for which the City must plan.
In the absence of improvement plans by FOOT, special provisions may be made when the City desires
improvement of a state road to maintain local levels of service standards. These provisions may include
the City expending funds for roadway improvements or providing FOOT with the funds, either of which
may be collected through an impact fee.
In this section, many of the local practices and policies used by the City are described in terms of their
general concept and the circumstances surrounding their use. The policies and practices both used in the
past and currently in use are identified. Policies and practices not in use which have the potential for
being used by the City are discussed in a later section of the CIE.
1. Level of Service Standards.
Level of Service (LOS) standards indicate the degree of service provided, or proposed to be provided by
public facilities based on their operational characteristics. Basically, the LOS indicates the capacity per
unit of demand for each public facility. Therefore, the LOS is a summary of the existing or desired
public facility conditions. Chapter 163, F.S., and Chapter 9J-5, F.A.C., both require LOS standards to be
included for all public facilities addressed by local governments in their CPo These LOS standards are to
be established for the specific purpose of issuing permits or development orders to ensure that adequate
capacity is available and will be maintained in public facilities for future development.
LOS standards can affect both the timing and location of development by encouraging development of
those areas which have public facilities with excess capacity. In addition, development is not allowed
unless the needed facilities and services are available. This development and provision of services usually
occur in a phased sequence over a period of time.
IX - 14
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPIT AllMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
CURRENT STATUS: The City has adopted formal LOS standards with the completion of their
CIP. Therefore, the LOS standards as outlined in the various elements of the CIP have been
listed below.
Sanitary Sewer:
Solid Waste:
204 gallons per equivalent residential unit per day
2.75 pounds per capita per day
Drainage:
Level A - No significant street flooding
Level B - No major residential yard flooding
Level C - No significant structure flooding
Level D - No limitation on flooding
(Based on 25-year/24-hour storm event)
Potable Water:
Collector Roadways:
Arterial Roadways:
Limited Access Road:
204 gallons per equivalent residential unit per day
LOS 0 for peak hour volumes
LOS 0 for peak hour volumes
LOSC
Public Transit Facilities (Volusia County): In process of establishing LOS standards
Recreation Standards for Facilities:
Facility
Parkland
Baseball/Softball
Basketball Court
Tennis Court
Handball/Racquetball Court
Community Center
Multi-Purpose/Soccer
Shuffle Board Court
Bocci Ball Court
Volley Ball Court
Boat Ramps
Bike/Pedestrian Trail
Fitness Trails
Activities Center
Gymnasium
Unit of Measure
5 acres/l,OOO persons
1 field/4,000 persons
1 court/5,000 persons
1 court/3,500 persons
1 court/4,000 persons
1 facility /30,000 persons
1 field/4,000 persons
1 court/1 ,500 persons
1 court/l0,000 persons
1 court/5,000 persons
1 ramp/4,700 persons
1 mile/4,000 persons
1/14,000 persons
1/15,000 persons
N/A
IX-IS
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPIT ALIMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
2. Capital Improvements Program (CIP)
A capital improvements program is a plan for capital expenditures to be incurred each year over a
fixed period of years to meet anticipated facility improvements and needs. The CIP identifies each
capital project or other capital expenditures anticipated by the City, as well as presenting estimates of
the resources needed to finance the project.
The CIP is designed to be consistent with the CIE of the local CP because it reflects the goals,
objectives and policies of the element and its implementation strategy, including the 5-year Schedule
of Improvements. In addition, the CIP is not restricted to only those public facilities addressed in the
CP, as is the CIE.
The first year of a CIP becomes the annual capital budget with longer range capital expenditures
identified for the 5-year program. The capital budget encompasses enacting appropriations for those
capital projects delineated for the first year of the CIP. The CIP, similar to CIE, is reviewed on an
annual basis.
CURRENT STATUS: The City is currently preparing a CIP with 5-year increments, which
contain annual capital budgets.
3. Impact Fees
Impact fees are imposed by many local governments on new developments to offset the costs of new
public facilities necessitated by the development. Local government may use this strategy as one
method of implementing the CIE. Chapter 163, F.S. includes impact fees as an innovative technique
that may be integrated into the land development regulations.
Impact fee development is a logical outgrowth of the CIE preparation. A rational basis for
developing an impact fee ordinance comes from the assessment of the local government's capital
improvement needs and its capability to provide for those needs which is required by Chapter 9J-5,
F.A.C.
Infill development location and timing may be affected and controlled through the use of impact
fees. This is because infill development usually occurs in those areas having capital facilities with
excess capacity. If the local government chooses not to recover the costs of capital facilities in
underutilized service areas, infill development may be encouraged by the absence of impact fees on
developments proposed within those areas.
CURRENT STATUS: The City currently has Impact fee resolutions for providing water,
wastewater, recreation, Fire and Police services.
IX-16
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
4. Utility Service Areas
The delineation of utility service areas within a comprehensive plan or crp may be used to describe
areas where local governments intend to provide public facilities and services. When used in
conjunction with a CrE and crp, utility service areas can be used as a tool to coordinate the timing
of public facilities and service provision within areas planned for development.
Additionally, the following benefits may be the result of using utility service areas:
a) Encourage efficient and orderly growth patterns;
b) Preserve agricultural and environmentally sensitive areas; and
c) Support control on facility extensions.
CURRENT STATUS: Utility service areas have been included in the Utilities Element of the
City's CP, but only for water and wastewater facilities and services.
5. User Charges and Connection Fees
User charges are designed to recover the costs of public facilities or services from those who benefit
from them. Many areas of local government employ the use of user charges. Monthly sewer charges
paying for the operation and maintenance of wastewater facilities as well as retiring debt service on
revenue bonds is a good example of user charge usage. This technique may also be applied to
transportation, potable water, solid waste, recreation and parking facilities and services.
These charges may be designed to vary, depending on the quantity and location of the services
rendered, in order to affect the pace and pattern of development. In other words, the greater the
distance from the service area, the higher the user charge.
CURRENT STATUS: User charges and connection fees are currently used for wastewater,
potable water, solid waste and recreation facility maintenance.
IX-17
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
6. Concurrency Management System.
This controls the timing and location of development by conditioning new development approvals
on evidence that sufficient facilities and services are present or will be provided in order to maintain
adopted LOS standards. In effect, this implements the 1985 Legislative mandate (Chapter 163, F.S.)
that requires public facilities to be available to support the impacts of new development. Therefore,
development approval becomes contingent on the ability of local governments to provide facilities
and services, and furthermore, may require the development itself to furnish the facilities and
services in order to maintain the adopted LOS standards. Additional benefits associated with a
Concurrency Management System are as follows:
a) Supports the consistency of the CIE with the Future Land Use Element;
b) Provides for the orderly expansion of public facilities;
c) Stabilizes capital improvement expenditures and taxing structures for
capital improvements; and
d) Reduces the possibility of damage to the environment from the use of
overburdened facilities
Typically, the Concurrency Management System interacts with the development approval process by
requiring that all zoning, subdivision or planned unit development (PUD) approval be granted only upon
demonstrated compliance with the system. The building permit stage is another level at which a
Concurrency Management System may function. In this context, the Concurrency Management System
may control development in areas that are already approved, but not as yet built on, such as pre-platted
lands.
CURRENT STATUS: The City has developed a Concurrency Management System as part of
this element.
7. Mandatory Dedication or Fees in Lieu Of.
The City may require, as a condition to plat approval, that subdivision developers dedicate a portion of
the land within the development to be used for public purposes such as roads, parks and schools.
Dedication may be made to the governing body, or to a private group such as a homeowners association.
When a subdivision is of such small scale or topographic conditions that a land dedication cannot
reasonably be required, the City may require that the subdivider pay a fee in lieu of dedication which is
equivalent to the amount of land that otherwise would have been dedicated by the developer. The
fee may be deposited into a separate account for use in the future towards the provision of such facilities.
IX - 1 8
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
As a result of the public facility provision, the adjacent area benefiting from the initiative would likely
become more attractive to development. Therefore, the acquired service potential may be used to
encourage growth in desired areas.
CURRENT STATUS: The City currently requires mandatory dedications of land or fees in lieu
there of.
8. Moratoria.
A moratorium, or stop-gap ordinance, is used to temporarily halt or freeze development in an area for a
specified period of time on an emergency basis. The ordinance may be imposed on building permits,
development approvals, or governmental services such as potable water connections or wastewater
system extensions and/or connections. The moratorium normally is imposed for a "reasonable time" to
allow the necessary planning activities to take place pending comprehensive plan preparation, adoption,
or amendment. The State of Florida legal system has found development moratoria to be a valid
measure of last resort in the protection of local public health, safety, and welfare when adopted in
accordance with applicable procedures. Some other considerations in adopting a moratorium include:
a) Determining legal status of existing permit applications and approvals to
determine the extent of "vested rights" for those developments approved
prior to ordinance adoption;
b) Specifying the geographic extent of the moratorium (whether it will be
City wide, or limited to specific hazard areas with existing service
insufficiencies); and
c) Specifying the time frame and conditions under which the moratorium will
be imposed.
CURRENT STATUS: The City is not currently imposing any moratoria.
D. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
FISCAL ASSESSMENT
In this section, an examination is made of the City's ability to fund the capital improvements listed in
Table 1. The purpose of the examination is to determine whether sufficient revenue will be available
using the existing budgeting framework utilized by the City to fund the required improvements at the
time when they are needed.
IX -1 9
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPIT ALIMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
The assessment process estimates future revenue receipts which the City will use to fund capital
improvements, then balances these revenues against the anticipated capital improvement expenditures.
Using this process, it becomes possible to guantify annual revenue surpluses and shortfalls, thereby
providing a basis for examining opportunities for financing the reguired capital improvements. The
examination of these opportunities is included in the next portion of this section, entitled "Summary and
Recommendations".
In addition to the direct cost for capital improvements, this section will review the fiscal impacts of the
capital improvements identified in the other CP elements upon tl1e actual operation of the City
departments responsible for facility management. This will include costs for additional personnel and
routing operation/maintenance activities. It should be noted that this assessment includes only those
items planned for in other CP elements.
Accounting System
The accounting system employed by tl1e City records financial transactions in individual accounts called
"funds". Records for each fund provide a complete accounting of fund assets, liabilities, reserves,
eguities, revenues and expenditures. The following is a brief description of the funds which the City has
established for capital improvement financing.
GENERAL FUND: The General Fund is the basic operating fund of the City. It accounts for all
revenues and expenditures used to finance tl1e traditional services associated with a municipal
government which are not accounted for in other funds. These services include police and fire
protection, civil defense, emergency rescue services, street services, parks and recreation, building safety,
general administration and any other activity for which a specific special fund has not been created.
ENTERPRISE FUND: Enterprise Funds are established to account for the financing of self-supporting
municipal activities which render services on a user charge basis to the general public. In the City, the
water and sewer utility, refuse collection and stormwater operations are operated as enterprise activities.
The significant characteristic of an Enterprise Fund is that the accounting system makes it possible to
determine whether the activity is operated at a profit or loss. All reports of Enterprise Funds are self-
contained. In this way, creditors, legislators and the general public can evaluate the performance of the
municipal enterprise on the same basis as investor-owned enterprise in the same industry.
Projected Revenues
The City's tax base was projected to decrease for 2009, assuming a 3.00% rate of growth for the adjusted
taxable value of property (including new construction), as indicated below. The City's assessment ratio is
projected to remain stable at 96%.
IX-20
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPIT ALIMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Tax Base
~
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Adjusted
taxable
income
$980,595,900
$1,010,013,783
$822.687.956
$1,040,314,197 $1,071,523,623 ~.
$847.368.595 $872.789.653 $898.973.343
$925.942.543
SOURCE: City of Edgewater Finance Dept.
Ad valorem tax yields were projected assuming the fiscal year ~ 2010 rate of millage and the average
annual increase (3.00%) in adjusted taxable value over the next five years. It should be noted that the
five-year average rate for millage amounts to a rate of ~ 6.36 per $1,000 of taxable property value.
Tax Base 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2l!H
Ad Valorem
Tax
Yield S,S5~,1l9S t:5,7211,718 55,892,3iO $6,1169,110 56,251,183
$4.968.598 $5.117 .656 $5.271.186 $5.429.321 $5.592.201
SOURCE: City of Edgewater Finance Dept. Assume a collection of 96% of the total ad valorem tax billings.
Table 3 indicates the revenues expected to be available to the City to finance the expenditures and capital
improvements for the years 2009 2013 2010-2014. Revenue projections are based on past trends and
anticipated changes in funding sources. These amounts are represented in 2010 dollars.
IX-21
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPIT ALIMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
TABLE 3
REVENUE PROJECTIONS AFFECTING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
:wo8 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
FUND
General Fund
Ad Valorem $ 5,554,095 $ 5,720,718 $ 5,892,340 ~W;-Wl $ 6,251,1 !l3
$4.968.598 $5.117.656 $5.271.185 $5.429.321 $5.592.201
Franchise Fees $ 1,003,256 $ 1,033,354 ~04,J54 ~~ $ 1,129,173
$992,037 $1.021.798 $1,052.452 $1.084.026 $1.116.547
State Shared Revenues $ 1,39e,ooQ $ 1,437,!l80 $ 1,4!l1,016 $ 1,525,447 $ 1,571,210
$1.659.760 $1.709.553 $1.760.840 $1.813.665 $1.868,075
Utility Tax $ 1,746,410 $ 1,79!l,!l02 $ 1,!l52, 766 $-1,QQS;d49 $ 19,695,600
$2.068.697 $2.130.758 $2.194,681 $2.260.521 $2.328,337
Other $ 3,!l47,786 $ 3,9~ $----4.,{)~ $ 4,204,5!l0 $---4,JdCl,7-t-7
$382.278 $393.746 $405.558 $417.725 $429,892
Subtotal: $+J,a4-7,547 $13,953,974 $14,372,593 $-M,8QJ,.7.7+ $15,247,!l!l4
$10.071.370 $10,373.511 $10,684.716 $11.005.258 $11 ,335,052
Enterprise Funds:
Wastewater $ 4,714,322 $ 3,914,OQQ $ 4,031,420 $ 4,152,363 $ 4,276,933
$3.842.445 $3.957.718 $4.076.450 $4,198.743 $4,324.705
Reclaimed $ 41J,170 $ 425,565 $ 43!l,332 $ 451,4!l2 $------49~
$428.467 $441.321 $454.561 $468.198 $482.244
Refuse $ 2,979,046 $ 3,Oe3M+ ~Q,47Q $ 3,255,284 $ 3,352,943
$3.203,972 $3.300,091 $3.399,094 $3,501.067 $3.606.099
Water $ 4, 714,322 $ 3,914,000 $ 4,031,420 $ 4,152,36J $ 4,276,933
$3.842.445 $3,957.718 $4.076.450 $4.198,743 $4.324.705
Stormwater $ 1,067,60+ $ 1,O~ $ 1,12!l,9Q5 $ 1,162,772 $ 1,197,655
$1,274.076 $1,312.298 $1,351,667 $1.392.217 $1.433,984
Net Bond Proceeds $ !l,070,OOO ~(),Qoo ~QQ,OO()
~ ~ ~
Subtotal $13,!l8!l, 461 $12,41!l,007 ~Q,547 $20,674,263 $20,069,491
$12.591.405 $12.969.146 $13.358.222 $13.758.968 $14.171.737
Total Revenues $27-,4d6,Qgg $26,371,9!l0 $35,233,140 $35, 4 7!l,034 $35,317,375
$22.662.775 $23.342.657 $24.042.938 $24.764.226 $25.506.789
The Enterprise Fund projected revenues for each account include anticipated income from user charges,
connection fees, impact fees, assessment receipts and customer service charges. The revenue projections
for wastewater and water user charges and connection fees are based on current individual fee amounts
(average monthly charge and connection fees) and projected total service connections. Solid waste user
charge revenue projections are based on current average monthly charges also.
The amount shown for net bond proceeds represents the use of bond proceeds which are anticipated to
be issued for major capital projects. The amounts shown reflect the year when the proceeds are
estimated to be encumbered for the project and not the use of the proceeds deposited in the
construction fund for financing the project.
IX-22
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Projected Expenditures
The projected expenditures have been separated into three categories for the purpose of this assessment:
(i) scheduled capital improvement project expenditures; (ii) capital improvement debt service
expenditures; and (iii) operating cost expenditures. The first category of expenditure represents the
direct cost of those capital improvements expected to be incurred annually, those identified by the other
CP elements, and those identified by the City's Capital Improvements Program (in addition to the CIP
projects already identified by the other CP elements). Table 4 lists these projected expenditures by Fund
for 2009 2013 2010-2014.
TABLE 4
EXPENDITURE PROJECTIONS FOR SCHEDULED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
FUND
General Fund
Annual Capital Expenditures $ 504,507 $ 1, 177,000 $ 977,000 $ 616,000 $ 1,925,000
$156.490 $150.000 $300.000 $300.000 $300.000
Enterprise Funds
AnnualCapijalExpenses
Water/Sewer $ 2,120,931 $ 5,928,000 $ 12,960,000 $ 8,045,000 $ 7,010,000
$3.708.000 $5.895.000 $8.950.000 $11.550.000 $250.000
Refuse $ 209.633 $ 352,000 $ 3BO,OOO $ 75,000 $ 240,000
$304.500 $325.000 $350.000 $350.000 $350.000
Stormwater $ 96, 750 $ 25,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 210,000
$680.073 $25.000 $30.000 $210.000 $30.000
Total Expenses $ 2,931.821 $ 7,482,000 $ 14,347,000 $ 8,766,000 $ 9,385,000
$4,849,063 $6,395,000 $9,630,000 $12,410,000 $930.000
The second category includes the projected expenditures required to meet debt service requirements for
outstanding bond issues, as well as planned future bond issues included in the revenue projects in Table
4. The future debt issues are anticipated by the City to provide monies to fund the reclaimed water
improvements as well as various general improvements. In addition to long-term indebtedness, the City
utilizes short-term borrowing for minor capital expenditures. Table 5 lists the projected debt service
expenditures by Fund.
IX-23
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
TABLE 5
DEBT SERVICE EXPEDNITURE PROJECTIONS
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
FUND
General Fund
Special Assess.
$
900,349 $---QOO;J49 $
$853.466
478,320
$443,410
Enterprise Funds
Wastewater
State SRF Loan
$ 1,811,438 $ 1,811,438 $ 1,811,438 $ 1,811,438 $ 1,811,438
$0 $0 iQ $0 $ 1,627,592
Water
Other Outstanding Debt
$ 1,367,687 $ 1,366,813 $ 1,368,262 ~~ $ 1,368,262
$1,304,546 $1,367,938 $1.444,286 $1,723,790 $1,065.140
Stormwater
Other Outstanding Debt
$
387,835 $ 387,835 $
$352,872
164,641
$18,333
The debt service to fund the enterprise component of the ClP program consists entirely of revenue
bonds and special assessment bonds. Based on the opinion of the City's Council, this debt does not
come under the current charter provisions of the City. With respect to the general debt associated with
the General Fund, the current charter requires that the City not incur additional debt of more than .75%
of the net taxable ad valorem property value during any forward moving five (5) year period unless such
debt was approved by a referendum of eligible voters in a general election. Based on the current Charter
provisions, the estimated debt service capacity assuming assessed valuation rates is as follows:
Value for ~ 2010
Charter Limitation at .75%
$980,595,906 $822.687.956
$7,351,169 $6.170.160
The final category of expenditures contains the annual operating costs for providing the necessary facility
improvements and services to the City's customers. These operating costs consist of the recurring
expenses associated with the normal operation of capital facilities such as supplies, maintenance,
personnel and utility costs associated with the assessed capital improvement needs. The operating costs
have been assigned to the first year in which they are expected to be incurred based on the schedule of
improvement contained in Table 4. Table 6 presents the annual operating expenditure of the City for
years 2009 2013 2010-2014.
IX-24
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Table 6
ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES
Millions of Dollars
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
FUND
General Fund $ 13,043,048 $ 13,026,614 $ 13,417,412 $ 13,819,935 $ 14,234,533
$12.544.666 $12.673.876 $12.804.417 $12.936.302 $13.069.546
Enterprise Fund
W aterlW astewater $ 9,841,814 $ 10,137,068 $ 10,441,180 $ 10,754,416 $ 11,077,048
$8.113.356 $8.196.924 $8.281.352 $8.366.650 $8.452.826
Refuse $ 2,769,413 $ 3,068,417 $ 3, 160,470 $ 3,255,284 $ 3,352,943
$3,203.972 $3.236.973 $3.270.314 $3.303,998 $3.338.029
Stormwater $1,064,101 $1,096,024 $1,128,905 $1, 162,772 $1,197,655
$1.274.076 $1.287.199 $1.300.457 $1,313.852 $1.327.385
In order to assess the City's capability to fund the necessary capital improvement expenditures, a
determinacion of revenue sufficiency must be made. This capability is shown by finding the difference
between the projected annual revenues and expenditures for each fund the City uses to finance the
capital improvements. The assessment results are shown in Table 7.
IX-25
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
TABLE 7
FISCAL ASSESSMENT NO.1
FUND 2008 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
GENERAL FUND
REVENUES $ 13,547,547 ~Q,Q+J $ 14,2€i€i,5Gd $ 14,1394,498 $ 15, 135,333
$12,544.666 $12,673,876 $12,804.417 $12.936,302 $13,069,546
EXPENDITURES $ 13,547,547 $ 13,850,973 $ 14,2613,503 $ 14,1394, 498 $ 15, 1 35,333
$12,544.666 $12.673,876 $12.804.417 $12,936,302 $13.069.546
BALANCE
ENTERPRISE FUND
WATERlWASTEWATER
REVENUES $ 9,841,814 $ 1O,1J7,068 $ 10,441,180 $ 10,754,416 $ 11,077,048
$8,113.356 $8.196,924 $8,281,352 $8,366.650 $8.452,826
EXPENSES $ 9,841,SM $ 10,137,098 $ 10,441,180 $ 10,754,416 $ 11,077,048
$8.113.356 $8,196,924 $8,281.352 $8,366,650 $8.452,826
BALANCE
REFUSE
REVENUES $ 2,979,0413 $ 3,0138,417 $ 3, 1130,470 $ 3,255,284 $ 3,352,943
$3,203,972 $3,236.973 $3,270.314 $3,303,998 $3,338,029
EXPENSES $ 2,979,046 ~ $ 3,160,470 $ 3,255,281 $ 3,352,913
$3,203,972 $3,236.973 $3,270,314 $3,303,998 $3,338.029
BALANCE
STORMWATER
REVENUES $ 1,444,601 $ 1,187,939 $ 1,332,577 $ 1,182,577 $ 1, 197,457
1,274,076 1,287,199 1,300,457 1,313,852 1,327,385
EXPENSES $ 1,444,6Q+ $ 1.187,939 $ 1,332,577 $ 1,182,577 $ 1,197,157
1,274,076 1,287,199 1,300,457 1,313,852 1,327,385
BALANCE
Included in Table 7 are the projected revenues (as previously listed in Table 3) and expenditures
(consisting of the sum of the cost and expenditures shown in Tables 4, 5, and 6). Improvement costs for
transportation and recreation have been included in the General Fund, improvement costs for
wastewater, water and solid waste are included in the Enterprise Fund, and stormwater improvement
costs have been included in the Stormwater Fund. The balance of each fund indicates the difference
between the projected revenues and expenditures. Revenue shortfalls for a given year are indicated by a
negative balance.
The City uses revenues from both the General and Enterprise Funds to meet annual operating expenses.
The General Fund is primarily used for transportation and recreation/park operating services, while the
Enterprise Fund is used for the operating costs associated with the Public Works and Utilities
Departments. Also included in the General Fund are CIP projects associated with paving and drainage
activities, and expenditure of the Public Works Department. Supplemental funding is provided by the
fees collected by the various departments from the persons directly receiving the service.
IX-26
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
The City-wide millage rate and the Enterprise Fund user charges are reviewed periodically by the City as
part of its budgeting process. Adjustments are made in order to ensure that sufficient funds are available
to meet expected expenses, including a reserve for contingency funds. In anticipation of future increases
in operating costs, the City may desire to adjust the millage rate and/or user charges upward by small
increments over a period of several years. This will initially provide additional operating reserves, which
can later be used to offset operating expense increases as they occur and allow the City to moderate
annual charges in the millage rates and user charges. For example, a one-half mill ($0.0005) increase in
the ad valorem tax millage rate will generate approximately $114,406 $390.613 for the anticipated ~
2010 adjusted taxable value of $980,595,906 $822.687.956. In addition, the following increases in ad
valorem tax revenues could result for 2009 20132010-2014:
Tax Base
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Result of
one-half
mill
increase
$5,834,(546
$6,009,(582
$5.359.211
$6,189,869
$5.519.987
$6,37(5,566
$5.685.587
$6,569,833
$5.856.155
$6.031.839
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Within this section, the projected revenue shortfalls as indicated in Table 7 are identified. Various
methods of overcoming these revenue shortfalls are examined herein and recommendations developed
as to the most appropriate methods of balancing the revenue and expenditure streams for the City's
funds. These balanced revenue/expenditure streams are shown in Table 7 and indicate the achievement
of an economically feasible comprehensive plan.
General Fund: As shown in Table 7, the General Fund is projected to have a balanced budget during
2009 2013 2010-2014.
Enterprise Fund: The Enterprise Fund is showing revenue shortfalls for the years 2010-WB 2014.
These revenue shortfalls are primarily due to the impw';cmcDts to and cxpansion of the City's
stormwatcl systcm. decline of the City's residential utilities customers.
The balancing of the projected revenue and expenditure streams within the Enterprise Fund
recommended will be accomplished by the following funding strategy changes:
1. Apply for various grants from state agencies to assist with various projects;
2. Obtain short term financing via low interest loans;
3. Carry forward any unexpected funds as revenue.
IX-27
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
In the event that some of the proposed sources are not attained, the following alternative strategies will
be pursued;
1. Additional deferral of projects to later years;
2. Procurement of additional revenue bonds instead of funding projects on a "pay-as-
you-go" basis;
3. Procurement of additional grant funding;
4. Procurement of a state revolving fund loan; and
5. Increase user fees for municipal services.
Additionally, improved planning and coordination will be initiated among the City's utility departments
in order to ensure that public facility and service provision is optimal for cost effectiveness. For
example, department representatives will work together to encourage the provision of public facilities
and services concurrently (where feasible), in order to limit the negative impacts of separate installation
(i.e. construct water/sewer services prior to paving/drainage improvements).
Also, other entities which share facilities with t11e City (such as FDOT and V olusia County) sharing the
use of tI1e U.S. Highway No. 1 within the City limit(s) will be coordinated with regarding improvements
to their shared facilities.
IX-28
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPIT AL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
TABLE 8
FISCAL ASSESSMENT NO.2
FUND 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
GENERAL FUND
REVENUES $1 J,517,547 $1 J,350.973 $14,266,503 $14,694,498 $15, 135,J33
$12.544.666 $12.673.876 $12.804.417 $12.936.302
EXPENDITURES $13.517,547 $13,350,973 $14,266,503 $14.694,498 $15,135,J33
$12.544.666 $12.673.876 $12.804.417 $12.936.302
BALANCE $ $ $ $
ENTERPRISE FUND
W A TERIW ASTEW A TER
REVENUES $ 9.841,314 $ 10,1J7,068 $ 10,441,130 $ 10,754,416 $ 11,077,048
$8.113.356 8.196.924 8.281.352 8.366.650
EXPENSES $ 9,841,814 $ 10,137,068 $ 10,441,180 $ 10,754,416 $ 11,077,048
$8.113.356 8.196.924 8.281.352 8.366.650
BALANCE $ $ $ $
REFUSE
REVENUES $ 2,979,046 $ J,063,417 $ 3, 160,170 $ 3,255,284 $ J,352,943
$3.203.972 $3.236.973 $3.270.314 $3.303.998
EXPENSES $ 2,979,046 $ J,068,417 $ 3,160,470 $ 3,255,284 $ 3,352,943
$3.203.972 $3.236.973 $3.270.314 $3.303.998
BALANCE $ - $ - $ - $ -
STORMWATER
REVENUES $ 1,444,601 $ 1,487,939 $ 1,332,577 $ 1,182,577 $ 1,197,457
1.274.076 1.287.199 1.300.457 1.313.852
EXPENSES $ 1,444,601 $ 1,487.939 $ 1,332,577 $ 1,182,577 $ 1,197,457
$1.274.076 $1.287.199 $1.300.457 $1.313.852
BALANCE $ $ $ $
IX-29
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPIT ALIMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
E. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
GOAL 1
The City shall undertake all actions necessary to ensure that needed public facilities and services are
provided to all residents within the City's jurisdiction in a manner which maximizes the use of existing
facilities, promotes orderly compact urban growth and protects the City's investments in its existing
facilities.
Objective 1: Capital improvements will be provided to correct eXisting deficiencies, to
accommodate projected future growth and to replace obsolete or worn-out facilities, as indicated
in the 5-year Schedule of Improvements delineated in this element.
Policy 1.1.1: The City shall include all projects identified in the CP which are
determined to be of relatively large scale and high cost ($25,000 or
greater) in the 5-year Schedule of Improvements as capital improvement
projects; all other capital improvements shall be included in the 5-year
capital improvements program and annual capital budget.
Policy 1.1.2: The City shall, for accounting purposes, also include this Element 10
conjunction with Debt Service and Operating expenditures.
Policy 1.1.3 The City shall, as a matter of priority, schedule and fund all capital
improvements identified by the 5-year Schedule of Improvements.
Policy 1.1.4 The City shall continue to adopt a Capital Improvements Program and
annual budget as a part of its budgeting process. The City will review the
Capital Improvements Program annually together with the Water
Facilities Supply Work Plan to include the water related projects identified
for the first five years of the Work Plan. The program shall be "financially
feasible" as defined in Florida Statutes.
Policy 1.1.5: The proposed capital improvement projects shall be evaluated and ranked
in order of priority according to the following guidelines:
a. Whether the project is needed to protect public health and safety, to
fulfill the City's legal commitment to provide facilities and services,
to reduce waste of water resources, or to preserve or achieve full use
of the existing facilities;
b. Whether the project promotes the City's development of alternative
water supplies, corrects water supply deficiencies or otherwise
results in a reduction in future dependence on Upper Floridian
aquifer water sources to support future growth of the City;
IX - 30
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAP IT ALIMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
c. Whether the project increases the efficiency of use of the existing
facilities, prevents or reduces future improvement costs, provides
service to developed areas lacking full service or promotes infill
development;
d. Whether the project represents a logical extension of facilities and
services within a designated utility service area; and
e. Whether the project implements the policies of the Comprehensive
Plan as they pertain to the concurrency requirements;
f. Whether the project is financially feasible.
Objective 2: The proportionate share of facility improvements which are necessitated by future
development in order to maintain adopted LOS standards shall be borne by those directly
benefiting from the improvements.
Policy 1.2.1: The City shall continue to implement its impact fee programs as
conditions to providing utility services to new developments.
Policy 1.2.2: The City has implemented a transportation impact fee ordinance.
Objective 3: The City will manage its financial resources to ensure the provision of needed
capital improvements for previously issued development orders for future
development and redevelopment.
Policy 1.3.1: The City will not issue development orders or permits unless public
facilities (which meet the adopted level of service standards) needed to
support development or redevelopment are available or will be available
concurrently with the impacts of the development.
Policy 1.3.2: The maximum ratio of outstanding indebtedness (for providing capital
improvements) to the property tax base shall be limited by the City to no
greater than .75%.
Policy 1.3.3: The City shall continue to adopt a 5-year capital improvements program
and annual budget as a part of its budgeting process.
Policy 1.3.4: The City will continue to apply for water, wastewater, solid waste and
other available grants on an annual basis to obtain funding to finance the
provision of capital improvements.
Objective 4: The City shall base all decisions regarding the issuance of development orders and
permits on the coordination of the development requirements included in this CP, its land
development regulations and ordinances and the availability of public facilities needed to support
such development at the time it is needed.
IX-31
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Policy 1.4.1:
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
The City shall use the following LOS standards in reviewing the impacts
of new development and redevelopment upon public facility provision:
204 gallons per equivalent residential unit per
day
2.75 pound per capita per day
Level A - No significant street flooding
Level B - No major residential yard flooding
Level C - No significant structure flooding
Level D - No limitation on flooding
(Based on 25-year/24-hour storm event)
204 gallons per equivalent residential unit per
day
Collector Roadways: LOS D for peak hour volumes
Arterial Roadways: LOS D for peak hour volumes
Limited Access Road: LOS C
Public Transit Facilities (Volusia County): In process of establishing LOS
Standards.
Sanitary Sewer:
Solid Waste:
Drainage:
Potable Water:
Recreation Standards for Facilities:
Facility
Parkland
Baseball/Softball
Basketball Court
Tennis Court
Handball/Racquetball Court
Community Center
Multi- Purpose/ Soccer
Shuffle Board Court
Bocci Ball Court
Volley Ball Court
Boat Ramps
Bike/Pedestrian Trail
Fitness Trails
Activities Center
Gymnasium
Unit of Measure
5 acres/I ,000 persons
1 field/4,000 persons
1 court/5,000 persons
1 court/3,500 persons
1 court/4,000 persons
1 facility /30,000 persons
1 field/4,000 persons
1 court/l,500 persons
1 court/I 0,000 persons
1 court/S,OOO persons
1 ramp/4,700 persons
1 mile/4,000 persons
1/14,000 persons
1/15,000 persons
N/A
Policy 1.4.2: The City shall evaluate all proposed CP amendments and requests for new
development or redevelopment according to the following guidelines as
to whether the proposed action would:
IX-32
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
a. Contribute to a condition of public hazard as described in the Utilities
Element;
b. Exacerbate any existing condition of public facility capacity deficits as
described in the Utilities Element, the Transportation Element and
the Recreation and Open Space Element;
c. Generate public facility demands that may be accommodated by
capacity increases planned in the 5-year Schedule of Improvements;
d. Conform with future land uses as shown on the Future Land Use
Map of the Future Land Use Element and utility service areas as
described in the Utilities Element;
e. If public facilities are developer-provided, accommodate public facility
demands based on adopted LOS standards;
f. If public facilities are provided, in part or whole, by the City
demonstrate financial feasibility, subject to this element; and
g. Affect state agencies and water management districts' facilities plans.
Objective 5: The City shall continue to limit the size and density of developments in the coastal
high-hazard area, as defined by the Coastal Management Element.
Policy 1.5.1: The City will not construct public facilities east of U.S. Highway 1
unless no other feasible sites are available outside the coastal high-
hazard area. Where it becomes necessary to construct public
facilities in the coastal high-hazard area, the design of the facilities
will incorporate flood proofing and additional structural support
in order to ensure minimum damage from storms and hurricanes.
Policy 1.5.2: The City will limit public expenditures that subsidize development
in coastal high-hazard areas except for the restoration and
enhancement of natural resources.
GOAL 2
Provide for a financially feasible public school facilities program.
Objective 2.1: Level Of Seroice Standards. The City shall ensure that the capacity of schools is
sufficient to support residential subdivisions and site plans at the adopted level of service
standard. This level of service standard shall be consistent with the level of service standard
adopted in the interlocal agreement entered into by the School Board and the local governments
within Volusia County.
Policy 2.1.1: The level of service standard adopted by the City shall be applied
consistently by all local governments within Volusia County and
by the School Board district-wide to all schools of the same type.
IX-33
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Policy 2.1.2:
Consistent with the interlocal agreement, the uniform, district-
wide level-of-service standards are set as follows using FISH
capacity based on the traditional school calendar:
a. Elementary Schools: 115% of permanent FISH capacity
for the concurrency service area.
b. K- 8 Schools: 115% of permanent FISH capacity for the
concurrency servIce area.
c. Middle Schools: 115% of permanent FISH capacity for
the concurrency service area
d. High Schools: 120% of permanent FISH capacity for the
concurrency servIce area
e. Special Purpose Schools: 100% of permanent FISH
capacity.
Policy 2.1.3: The following schools shall achieve the adopted level of service
on or before the identified date. The level of service presented in
the following table is the tiered level of service that shall apply to
that school unit the date noted in the table
IX-34
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
School LOS DATE
Orange City Elementary 117% July 1, 2012
Horizon Elementary 158% July 1,2012
Freedom Elementary 126% July 1, 2012
Osceola Elementary 117% July 1, 2012
Ortona Elementary 150% July 1,2012
Ormond Beach Elementary 116% July 1, 2012
Southwestern Middle 120% July 1. 2013
New Smyrna Beach Middle 122% July 1,2014
(Note: This policy designates a tiered LOS for those schools that exceed the desired levels at
the end of the five- year capital improvements program.)
Objective 2.2: School Capital Facilities Planning. The City shall cooperate with the School Board to
ensure existing deficiencies and future needs are addressed consistent with adopted level of
service standards for public schools.
Policy 2.2.1: The City adopts by reference the School Board's five-year work
program approved annually each September as part of the overall
School District budget. The City shall review the annual work
program to verify that it is financially feasible and will maintain
the level of service standards by the end of the five-year period.
Policy 2.2.2: The City shall coordinate with the school board and adopt
development conditions to ensure that future development pays a
proportionate share of the costs of capital facility capacity needed
to accommodate new development and to assist in maintaining
the adopted level of service standards via impact fees and other
legally available and appropriate methods.
IX-35
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPIT ALIMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE (5- YEAR)
As shown in TABLE 9, the Five (5) Year Schedule of Improvements is the mechanism by which the City
can effectively stagerhe timing, location, projected cost, and revenue sources for the capital improvements
derived from all the CP elements, in support of the Future Land Use Element. This 5- Year Schedule of
Improvements,has been used to document the "economic feasibility" of the City's CP, based upon the
preceding sections of this element entitled "Capital Improvements Inventory", "Financial Analysis" and
"Goals, Objectives, and Policies",
IX-36
TABLE 9
City of Edgewater
Five Year Schedule of Improvements
Fiscal Years Ending 20092013
Project Schedule Cost Revenue Source LOS Non-LOS
PUBLIC SAFETY: (Fire/Rescue)
Vehicle Replacement 2009 2Q13 $1,05e,000 General Fund R
12 Lead/ EKG Monitor ~ $25,000 General Fund R
Genesis Extrication Tool System 2Q..U $30,000 General Fund R
Self Contained Breather Apparatus ~ $100,000 General Fund R
PUBLIC SAFETY: (Police)
Vehicle Replacement 2009-2013 $467,616 General Fund R
Police Station Land :'\cquisition 2009 $80,000 Police Impact Feos e
Radio System Replacement 2010 $200,000 General Fund R
LEISURE SERVICES:
Vehicle Replacement 201 O-:ro.1-J $271,000 General Fund R
Animal Sholtor 2009 $250,000 COf')ital Fund /II
H3'....ks PaFk !\mpitheator 2009 $183,175 Capital Fund /II
Kennedy Park Rennovations 2009/2012 $545,000 Capital Fund N
Dog Park ~ $50,000 Capital Fund N
Mango Lake Park ~ $500,000 Capital Fund N
Harper Liquid Cooled Dewees Slope Mower 2009 $25,000 General Fund R
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES:
Vehicle Replacement 2009-2013 $2,759,750 Water & Sewer Fund R
Wastewater Slip lining 2009 $200,000 Water & Sewer Fund R
Bar Screen 'NWTP 2009 $120,000 Water 8. Sm'/er Fl,lFld R
S~ Service !"rea Decign 8. Construction 2009 2010 $2,101,400 Water 8. Sewer Fund /II
Retrofit Lift Station 1,2,4-3 2009-2011 $180,000 Water & Sewer Fund R
(2) 25 HP Comprm:Eors 'P.'WTP 2009 $30,000 Water 8. Sewer Fl,lnd R
Western Storage Tank & Pump Station 2010 $130,000 Water & Sewer Fund N
WWTP Rehab/Replacement 2010-2011 $6,000,000 Water & Sewer Fund R
2.5 MGD Wastewater Treatment Plant :w.w-2013 $15,000,000 Water & Sewer Fund N
SE Service Area Reclaimed Improvements 2009-2011 $5,350,000 Water & Sewer Fund N
ART Wells 17,18,19,20 2009 $1,210,931 Water & Sewer Fund N
Aerator and stairway replacement 2009 $200,000 Water & Sewer Fund R
Claricone Painting 2009 $100,000 Water & Sewer Fund
Replacement of 2" Water Lines 2009 $40,000 Water & Sewer Fund R
Western Reclaimed Water Main Extension 2009-2011 $3,850,000 Water & Sewer Fund N
Sliplining existing pipes-Wildwood Sub. 2009-2013 $295,000 Stormwater Fund R
Eastern Shores Project 2009 $96,750 Stormwater Fund N
PUBLIC WORKS:
Vehicle Ref')13Cement 2009 $65,000 General Fund R
Floet Fuel Tank Replacement 2009 $125,000 General Fund R
30th Street Sidewalk 2009 $157,716 Capital Fund N
Road Repaving 2009-2013 $2,2eO,272 Capital Fund R
LEGEND: R-REPLACEMENT, N- NEW, E- EXPANDED
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPIT ALIMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
PrOject Schedule Cost Revenue Source LOS Non-LOS
TABLE 9
City of Edgewater
Five Year Schedule of Improvements
Fiscal Years Ending 2010-2014
PUBLIC SAFETY: (Fire/Rescue)
Vehicle Replacement 2010-2014 $ 590,000 General Fund R
12 Lead/ EKG Monitor 2013 $ 25,000 General Fund R
Genesis Extrication Tool System 2012 $ 30,000 General Fund R
Self Contained Breather Apparatus 2013 $ 100,000 General Fund R
PUBLIC SAFETY: (Police)
Vehicle Replacement 2009-2014 $ 411,990 General Fund R
LEISURE SERVICES:
Vehicle Replacement 2010-2014 $ 296,000 General Fund R
Kennedy Park Rennovations 2013 $ 290,000 Capital Fund N
Dog Park 2013 $ 50,000 Capital Fund N
Mango Lake Park 2013 $ 500,000 Capital Fund N
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES:
Vehicle Replacement 2010-2014 $ 2,694,500 Water & Sewer Fund R
Retrofit Lift Station 1 ,2,Q 2010-2011 $ 353,000 Water & Sewer Fund R
SE Storaqe Tank & Pump Station 2010 $1 ,200,000 Water & Sewer Fund N
Western Storage Tank & Pump Station 2011 $130,000 Developer N
WWTP Rehab/Replacement 2011 $3,000,000 SRF & Developer R
2.5 MGD Wastewater Treatment Plant 2011-2013 $15,000,000 SRF & Developer N
SE Service Area Reclaimed Improvements 2011 $5,000,000 SRF & Impact Fees N
Ammoniators WTP 2010 $25,000 Water & Sewer Fund R
Wells 21-24 and raw water mains 2014 $2,300,000 Developer N
ART Wells 17.18,19,20 2010 $1 ,800,000 Water & Sewer Fund N
Aerator and stairway replacement 2010 $150,000 Water & Sewer Fund R
Replacement of 2" Water Lines 2014 $50,000 Water & Sewer Fund R
Western Reclaimed Water Main Extension 2011 3.500,00 SRF & Developer N
Sliplining existing pipes-Wildwood Sub. 2011-2013 $270,000 Stormwater Fund R
Eastern Shores Project 2010 $680,073 Stormwater Fund N
PUBLIC WORKS:
Road Repaving 2010-2014 $2,077 ,000 Capital Fund R
Siqnalize SR 442 @ 1-95 SB Ramp 2012 $287 ,546 Developer N
30th Street Sidewalk 2011 $157,716 Capital Fund N
Legend: R - Replacement, N - New, E - Expanded
IX - 3 7
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
PROGRAM MONITORING AND EVALUATION
The role of monitoring and evaluation is vital to the effectiveness of any planning program and
particularly to the CIE. This is largely because the City's revenue and expenditure streams are subject to
fluctuations in the market and the economy. It is the behavior of these streams which will be used to
predict fiscal trends in order to maintain the City's adopted LOS standards for public facilities.
Therefore, the CIE reguires a continuous program for monitoring and evaluation, pursuant to Chapter
163, F.S., this element will be reviewed on an annual basis to ensure that reguired fiscal resources are
available to provide public facilities as necessary to support the adopted LOS standards.
The annual review will be the responsibility of the local planning agency and the City Finance Director
and City Manager will serve as advisory members at all formal deliberations related to capital
improvement monitoring and evaluation. The local planning agency's finding and recommendations will
be presented to the City Council at a public meeting. The City Council will direct staff to take any
actions deemed appropriate based on the findings and recommendations of the local planning agency.
The review will include the following considerations, plus an examination of these considerations in
order to determine their continued appropriateness:
1. Any corrections, updates, modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; acceptance of
facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the element; or the date of
construction of any facility enumerated in this element;
2. The CIE's consistency with the CP elements and its support of the Future Land Use
Element;
3. The City's ability to provide public facilities and services within the utility service area in
order to determine any need for boundary modification or adjustment;
4. The priority assignment of existing public facility deficiencies;
5. The City's progress in meeting those needs determined to be existing deficiencies;
6. The criteria used to evaluate capital improvement projects in order to ensure that projects are
being ranked in their appropriate order of priority;
7. The City's effectiveness in maintaining its adopted LOS standards;
8. The City's effectiveness in reviewing the impacts of plans and programs of state agencies and
water management districts that provide public facilities within the City's jurisdiction;
9. The effectiveness of impact fees for assessing new development a pro rata share of the
improvement costs which they generate;
10. The impacts of special districts and any regional facility and service provision upon the City's
ability to maintain its adopted LOS standards;
11. The ratio of outstanding indebtedness to the property tax base;
12. Efforts made to secure grants and/or private funds, whenever available to finance the
provision of capital improvements;
13. The transfer of any unexpected account balances;
14. The criteria used to evaluate proposed plan amendments and reguest for new development
or redevelopment; and
15. Capital improvements needed for the latter part of the planning period, for inclusion in the 5-
Year Schedule of Improvements.
IX-38
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAP IT ALIMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
In addition to the annual Capital Improvements Element review mentioned above, each request for a
development order will be reviewed by a Technical Review Committee, as designated by the City
Manager and other appropriate personnel for the purpose of establishing whether the various adopted
level of service standards will be adversely impacted if development is allowed to proceed. No
development order will be issued if it is determined that the public facilities needed to maintain the
adopted level of service standards will not be available concurrently with the impact of the development.
Further, issuance of development orders will be delayed until the correction of existing system
deficiencies which are required to increase the level of service provided to the adopted standard are
complete.
IX-39
City of
bDG~~ATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 27, 2009 TBD
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
1. PUBLIC FACILITIESt CAPACITIES AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE INVENTORY
FOR CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
The following inventories shall be maintained by the City to be used for the concurrency assessment
of new development.
a) TRANSPORTATION
Design capacity of different roadway types.
The existing level-of-service measured by the p.m. peak hour directional trips.
The status of service degradation of those roads classified as backlogged based on
the methodology described in the Transportation Element of this Plan.
The adopted level-of-service standards for all roadway types.
The existing capacities or deficiencies of the roadway network.
The improvements to be made to the roadway network in the current fiscal year by
the City, Volusia County, the Florida Department of Transportation or other public
agency and the impact of such improvements on the existing capacities or
deficiencies.
b) SANITARY SEWER
The capacity of the wastewater treatment facilities.
The existing level-of-service standards measured by the average number of gallons
per day/per unit based on the average flow experienced at the treatment plant and
the total number of equivalent residential units within the service area.
The adopted level-of-service standards for average daily flow per equivalent
residential unit.
The existing deficiencies of the system.
The reserve capacities.
CM-l
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
A. POTABLE WATER
The design capacity of potable water treatment facilities.
The existing level-of-service measured by the average number of gallons per day per
unit based on the average flows experienced and the total number of equivalent
residential units within the service area.
The existing potable water storage capabilities of the water system.
The adopted level-of-service standards for the potable water facility components.
The existing capacities or deficiencies of the system.
The reserved capacities.
B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
The design capacity of solid waste disposal facilities.
The existing level-of-service.
The adopted level-of-service standard for solid waste.
The projected capacities or deficiencies.
C. STORMWATER DRAINAGE
The existing level-of-service measured by storm event as determined by the City and
its Consulting Engineers.
The adopted level-of-service standard for stormwater drainage quantity and quality.
D. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
The existing acreage of parkland and the existing number of recreation facilities as
outlined in the Recreation and Open Space Element of this Plan.
The existing level-of-service measured by the number of acres of parkland available
per 1,000 residents of the City based on an inventory of parklands in the City and the
population of the City.
The existing level-of-service for recreation facilities measured by the adopted
standard based on an inventory of the facilities in the City and the population of the
City.
CM-2
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
The adopted level-of-service standards for parkland acreage and individual recreation
facilities as outlined in the Recreation and Open Space Element of this Plan.
The projected capacities or deficiencies.
2. CONCURRENCY ASSESSMENT
The Development Services Department is responsible for determining concurrency for all
applications for development, redevelopment, and subdivision plats. When reviewing applications
for such developments, the Department performs a Concurrency Assessment to ensure that public
facilities are or will be available concurrent with the impacts of the proposed development. The
assessment includes a basis for the establishment of existing conditions and the capacity of existing
public facilities to service new development.
The Department shall identify:
. The ability of existing facilities to accommodate the proposed development at the
adopted level-of-service standards;
. Any existing facility deficiencies that will need to be corrected prior to the
completion of the proposed development;
. The facility(s) improvements or additions that will be needed to accommodate the
impacts of the proposed development at the adopted level(s)-of-service created by
the proposed development;
. The date such facility(s) improvements or additions will need to be completed to be
concurrent with the impacts on such facility(s) created by the proposed
development; and
. A recommendation or approval or denial with any applicable conditions or the
timing and location of needed improvements.
Prior to the issuance of a development order for a proposed new development, the City Council
and/ or the Development Services Department determines:
. The impacts created by the proposed development;
. Whether the public facilities covered under the Concurrency Management System
will be available concurrent with the impacts of new development at the adopted
level;
. Those facility(s) improvements or additions that are required to ensure the findings
of concurrency; and
. The entity responsible for the design and installation of all required facility(s)
improvements or additions.
a) Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage and Potable Water Facilities
1) A development order is issued subject to the condition that at the time of the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, or its functional equivalent, the
CM-3
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
necessary facilities and services are in place and available to service the new
development; or
2) At the time the development order is issued, the necessary facilities are
guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement pursuant to Section
163.3220, FS; or
3) An agreement, or development order, issued pursuant to Chapter 380, FS, to
be in place and available to serve the new development at the time of the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. (Section 163.3180[2a], FS)
4) Additionally for potable water, prior to approval of a building permit or its
functional equivalent, the City shall determine that there will be adequate
water supplies and facilities available no later than the date at which the City
anticipates issuing a certificate of occupancy to serve the new development.
b) Parks and Recreation Facilities
1) At the time the development order is issued, the necessary facilities are in
place, or actual construction has commenced; or
2) A development order is issued subject to the condition that at the time of the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the acreage for the necessary facilities
to serve the new development is dedicated, or acquired by the City, or funds
in the amount of the developer's fair share are committed; and
3) A development order is issued subject to the conditions that the necessary
facilities needed to serve the new development are scheduled to be in place
or under actual construction, not more than one (1) year after the issuance of
a Certificate of Occupancy as provided in the City's Capital Improvement
Element; or
4) At the time the development order is issued, the necessary facilities are the
subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the necessary
facilities and services to serve the new development to be in place or under
actual construction no more than one (1) year after issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy; or
5) At the time the development order is issued, the necessary facilities are
guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement pursuant to Section
163.3220, FS or under actual construction not more than one (1) year after
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
c) Transportation Facilities
1) At the time a development order is issued, the necessary facilities and
services are in place or under construction; or
2) A development order is issued subject to the conditions that the necessary
facilities and services needed to serve the new development are scheduled to
be in place or under actual construction not more than three (3) years after
the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or its functional equivalent, as
provided in the adopted City's five (5) year schedule of capital
improvements. The schedule of capital improvements may include
transportation projects included in the first three (3) years of the most
current adopted Florida Department of Transportation Five Year Work
CM-4
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
Program. The Capital Improvement Element must include the following
policies:
i. The estimated date of actual project construction commencement
and the estimated completion date; and
ii. A provision that a plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer
or delay construction of any local road facility which is needed to
maintain the adopted level of service standard and which is listed
in the first three (3) years of the five (5) year schedule of
improvements in the Capital Improvements Element.
3) At the time a development order is issued, the necessary facilities are the
subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the necessary
facilities to serve the new development to be in place or under actual
construction no more than three (3) years after the issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy; or
4) At the time a development order is issued, the necessary facilities and
services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant
to Section 163.3220, FS; or an agreement or development order is issued
pursuant to Chapter 380, FS; and will be in place or under actual
construction not more than three (3) years after issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy.
The adopted level-of-service standards (see Table I) are the minimum acceptable standards with
which all proposed new development shall comply. The Concurrency Management portion of this
element does not preclude the Planning and Zoning Board or the City Council from imposing other
conditions of approval, including improvements and additions to the facilities covered under this
system beyond the minimum necessary to achieve concurrency.
2. GENERAL RULES FOR CONCURRENCY ASSESSMENT
a) EXISTING DEFICIENCIES
No development may be approved which will impact a facility which is currently deficient
unless the facility is required to be improved in the current fiscal year pursuant to a previous
development order or permit. Any needed improvements shall be completed prior to the
projected impacts of the proposed development.
b) APPROVED IMPACTS
The impacts of new development shall be assessed against the existing conditions and the
projected impacts from approved but unbuilt development. These two items together shall
be considered the existing conditions for all public facilities for the impact assessment of all
proposed development.
CM-5
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
c) PHASING
Development that is proposed to be phased may also phase the improvement of facilities
provided the concurrency requirements for each facility are met.
d) TIME SPECIFIC APPROVAL
All development approvals shall have a time period specified in the development order or
permit in which development must commence. The time period may involve two or more
phases but the timing of each phase shall be specified in the development order or permit.
Any required improvements shall also require a time period for construction and
completion. Should development or facilities improvements fail to begin or be completed in
accordance with the development order or permit, all outstanding approvals of the
development shall expire. Amendments to time schedules shall be permitted but must be
approved by the body granting the original approval.
e) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Development Services Department may require additional information from applicant
or other City Departments in order for an accurate assessment to be conducted. Such
additional information requests shall be reasonable and be provided in writing to the
applicant or appropriate Department.
Should the Development Services Department require a special study (such as traffic counts
on a road that is not regularly monitored), the applicant shall provide such information.
Review and approval of proposed development may be postponed for a reasonable time
period in order that more information may be gathered on a facility. Proposed development
may be denied approval, for failure of the applicant to provide adequate information on the
projected impacts created by the development.
f) TRANSPORTATION
The City's Land Development Code provides development thresholds at which traffic
studies will be required. Required studies shall use the latest edition of the Institute of
Traffic Engineers (lTE) Manual to calculate the number of trips generated by the proposed
development. The study shall then show the distribution of the projected trips, determine
existing condition and project the level of service of impacted roads.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all facility improvements necessary to
accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving a Certificate of
Occupancy shall be in place. Completed improvements may be required prior to the
issuance of a building permit if deemed necessary for public safety purposes.
CM-6
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
g) SANITARY SEWER
The City's Land Development Code provides sanitary sewer use standards for residential
and non-residential development based on equivalent residential units. TI1e City may also
require commercial and industrial developments to provide a description and estimate of
water use needs for any commercial or industrial processes which create wastewater that will
be discharged into the City's system.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all facility improvements necessary to
accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving a Certificate of
Occupancy shall be in place, as required by the Development Order.
h) POTABLE WATER
The City's Land Development Code provides potable water use standards for residential and
non-residential development based on equivalent residential units. TI1e City may also require
commercial and industrial developments to provide a description and estimate of water use
needs for any commercial or industrial processes involving potable water.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all facility improvements necessary to
accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving a Certificate of
Occupancy shall be in place, as required by the Development Order.
Prior to approval of a building permit or its functional equivalent, the City shall determine
that there will be adequate water supplies and facilities available no later than the date at
which the City anticipates issuing a certificate of occupancy to serve the new development.
All development is subject to the City's Concurrency Management system.
i) SOLID WASTE
The City's Land Development Code provides solid waste standards for control and
operation for residential, commercial and industrial developments. Developments which are
potential hazardous waste generators will be responsible for coordinating with Volusia
County for disposal of such waste.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all facility improvements necessary to
accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving a Certificate of
Occupancy shall be in place.
j) STORMWATER DRAINAGE
All developments shall prepare a drainage plan based on the Stormwater regulation which
incorporate the level-of-service design storm. Such plans shall be approved by the City's
Engineer prior to the approval of the development.
CM-7
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
Prior to the issuance of a building pennit, all facility improvements necessary to
accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving the building permit
shall be approved and all improvements shall be completed prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy.
k) RECREATION
The City's Land Development Code requires recreation Impact fees for residential
construction and/or land conveyance for new subdivisions. Commercial and industrial
developments shall not be assessed as having an impact on recreational facilities. However,
the City reserves the right to require the provision of recreational facilities as part of Planned
Unit Developments.
4) GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
GOAL 1:
The City shall undertake necessary action to economically and efficiently provide needed public
facilities and services to all residents within its jurisdiction in a manner which protects investments in
existing facilities, maximizes the use of existing facilities and promotes orderly compact urban
growth.
Objective 1.1: Capital Improvements will be provided to correct eXistIng deficiencies, to
accommodate anticipated future growth, and to replace outdated and obsolete facilities, as indicated
in the Schedule of Improvements of this Element.
Policy 1.1.1 The City shall include all projects identified in the other Elements of
this Comprehensive Plan determined to be of relatively large scale in
cost ($25,000 or greater) as Capital Improvement Projects and are
included within the Schedule of Improvements portion of this
Element.
Policy 1.1.2 The City shall, for accounting purposes, also include into this
Element Debt Service and Operating expenditures.
Policy 1.1.3 The City shall, as a matter of priority, schedule and fund all capital
improvement projects in the City's annual Capital Improvement
Program which are designed to correct existing deficiencies as listed
in the various other Elements of this Plan.
Policy 1.1.4 The City will continue its current program of providing for renewal
and replacement of capital facilities as outlined in the various
Elements of this Plan.
CM-8
CITY OF EDGEW A TER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
Policy 1.1.5
A Capital Improvements Coordinating Committee shall be created
composed of the Technical Review Committee members as
designated by the City Manager to evaluate and rank, on an annual
basis and in order of priority, the projects proposed to be included in
the Schedule of Improvements.
Policy 1.1.6
Proposed City Capital Improvement Projects shall be evaluated and
ranked in order of priority according to the following criteria:
a. Whether the project is needed to protect the public health and safety, to
fulfill the City's legal commitment to provide facilities and services, or to
preserve or achieve full use of those facilities already in place;
b. Whether the project increases efficiency of use of existing facilities,
prevents or reduces future improvement costs, provides services to
develop areas lacking full service or promotes in-fill development;
c. Whether the project represents a logical extension of facilities and
services within the designated Utility Service Area Boundary, and is
coordinated with the plans of County and/or State agencies that provide
facilities within the City;
d. Whether the project implements the policies of this Comprehensive Plan
as they pertain to the concurrency requirements;
e. Whether the project is financially feasible.
Objective 1.2: Future development will bear a proportionate cost of facility improvements
necessitated by the development in order to maintain the adopted level-of-service standards.
Policy 1.2.1 The City will continue to collect impact fees from development
projects to pay for the provision of water, sewer and recreation
facilities required by those projects.
Policy 1.2.2 The City shall consider the use of other impact fees, such as for
public safety services.
Policy 1.2.3 All new development shall be required to donate or reserve their fair
share of right-of-way adjacent to major roadways prior to the
issuance of a final development order.
Objective 1.3: The City will manage its financial resources to ensure the provision of
needed capital improvements for previously issued development orders and for future
development and redevelopment. This objective shall be achieved through the
implementation of the following policies:
Policy 1.3.1 In providing capital improvements, the City shall limit the maximum
ratio of outstanding indebtedness to no greater than .75% of the
property tax base.
CM-9
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
Policy 1.3.2
The City shall continue to adopt a Capital Improvement Program and
an operating budget on a yearly basis as part of this budgeting
process.
Policy 1.3.3
The City shall continue to apply for and secure grants or private
funds whenever available to finance the provision of capital
improvements and other City improvement projects.
Policy 1.3.4
Prior to the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy, the City will
provide for all public facilities needed to service development for
which Development Orders were previously issued.
Policy 1.3.5
The City shall allocate the costs of new public facilities on the basis
of the benefits received by the existing and future residents.
GOAL 2:
Maintain a Concurrency Management System to ensure public facilities and services to support
development are available concurrent with the impact of development.
Objective 2.1: The City will continue to utilize a Concurrency Management System so that
decisions regarding the issuance of development orders and permits will be based upon
coordination of the development requirements included in this plan, the land development
regulations and the availability of necessary facilities to support such development.
Policy 2.1.1 The City shall use the level-of-service (LOS) standards (found in
Table CM-I) in reviewing the impacts of new development and/or
redevelopment upon public facilities and services.
Policy 2.1.2 Prior to approval of a building permit or its functional equivalent, the
City shall determine that there will be adequate water supplies and
facilities available no later than the date at which the City anticipates
issuing a certificate of occupancy to serve the new development. All
development is subject to the City's Concurrency Management
system.
Policy 2.1.3 The City shall track current water demand and outstanding
commitments in order to determine the availability of an adequate
water supply for proposed developments.
CM -10
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
Level-of-Service Standards
TABLE CM-I
Sanitary Sewer 204 gallons/ERU/day
Solid Waste 2.5Ibs/ capital day
Potable Water
Water quality: Meet State and Federal Drinking Water Standards 204 gallons/ERU/day
Drainage 25 year/24 hr storm
Limited Access Roads C, or as otherwise prescribed by FOOT
Arterial 0
Collectors 0
Recreation LOS/Person
Parkland 5 acres/ 1 ,000 persons
Baseball/Softball 1 Field/4,000 persons
Basketball Court 1 court/5,000 persons
Tennis Court 1 court/3,500 persons
Handball/Racquetball Court 1 court/4,000 persons
Community Center 1 facility/30,000 persons
Multi-Purpose/Soccer 1 field/4,000 persons
Shuffle Board Court 1 court/1 ,500 persons
Bocci Ball Court 1 court/I 0,000 persons
Volley Ball Court 1 court/5,000 persons
Boat Ramps 1 ramp/4,700 persons
Bike/Pedestrian Trail 1 mile/4,000 persons
Fitness Trails 1 mile/14,000 persons
Activities Center 1/15,000 persons
Gymnasium N/A
ERU-Eguivalent Residential Units
Policy 2.1.4 Prior to the approval of an application for a final subdivision or
development plan, the City will review the proposed application to
ensure that the public facilities and services needed to support the
development are available concurrent with the impacts of such
development based on the Concurrency Management System.
Policy 2.1.5 Provisions in the Comprehensive Plan that ensure public facilities
and service standards will be met to satisfy the Concurrency
requirements are listed below:
a. The necessary facilities and services are in place at the time a
development permit is issued; or
b. A development permit is issued subject to the condition that
the necessary facilities and services will be in place when the
impacts of the development occur; or
c. The necessary facilities are under construction at the time a
permit is issued; or
d. The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an
enforceable development agreement that includes the
provision of the Florida Administrative Code. The agreement
CM-ll
CITY OF EDGEWATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
must guarantee that the necessary facilities and services will
be in place when the impacts of the development occur; or
e. At the time the development permit is issued, the necessary
facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed
contract which provides for the commencement of the actual
construction of the required facilities or the provision of
services within one (1) year of the issuance of the applicable
development permit.
f. The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an
enforceable development agreement which require the
commencement of the actual construction of the facilities or
the provision of services within one (1) year of the issuance
of the applicable development permit.
Policy 2.1.6 Proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments and requests for new
development or redevelopment shall be evaluated according to the
following guidelines as to whether the proposed action would:
a. Be consistent with the Utilities Element and the Coastal
Management Element and not contribute to a condition of
public hazard.
b. Be consistent with the Transportation Element; Utilities
Element and Recreation and Open Space Element and not
intensify any existing public facility capacity deficits not
envisioned within this plan.
e. Generate public facility demands that may be accomplished
by planned capacity increases.
d. Conform with future land uses as shown on the Future Land
Use Map of the Future Land Use Element.
e. Accommodate public facility demands based upon level-of-
service standards by provision of facilities by the developer or
by the City consistent with this element.
f. Be consistent with the County, State and Regional agencies
and water management district's facilities plans.
CM -12
.
!"I_
.
I
.
.1
I
CITY OF EDGEWATER, F1.
Ci ty of
EDGEWATER
Inc. 1951
(-~ f\ I) Il'A l I M I ) I{ ( ) \/ E f\~ E N 'l~
P I{ ( ) ( ~ I{ ;\ f\/1
1-'1' 2-G(}g=2()()9 'l~( ) 2-0"ht~2()1 ~
1,'1" 2()()() 2() 1 0 'l~() 2() 1.3- 2014-
.
., 1
'J.
I
.
.
The Capital Improvement Program as set forth in this document is a long range planning tool for the
City of Edgewater. The document reflects five years of capital outlay with the first year officially
adopted as part of the fiscal year 2008-2009 200<)-2010 budget by the City Council. The remaining
years in the CIP serve as a planning guide, which is reviewed annually.
The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) provides a planned and programmed approach to utilizing
the City's financial resources in the most responsive and efficient manner to meet its service and fa-
cility needs. The CIP serves as a "blueprint" for the future of the community. Development of the
CIP requires integration of financial, engineering and planning functions.
The CIP also incorporates needs identified in the Capital Improvements Element (CIE). The CIE fo-
cuses on anticipated infrastructure requirements for the follm.ving six facility types required by the
State of Florida: Parks, Solid Waste, Stormwater, Transportation, Water and Wastewater.
The CIE focuses on service level standards and the land use plan adopted by the City Council in order
to preclude deficiencies in adopted level of services. The CIP is developed to achieve the following
results:
* Consolidating and coordinating all department requests with the goal of reducing
unnecessary delays and coordinating individual departments' improvement programs.
* Establishing a system of procedures and priorities by which each proposal can be
evaluated in terms of public need, the comprehensive planning of the area, and the
interrelationships of projects and cost requirements.
* Scheduling capital projects over an extended period so the most efficient financial plan for the
CIP can be achieved.
* Assuring that the s-year schedule of improvements for each type of facility is financially feasible.
* Successfully implement level of service standards for public facilities as outlined in
Florida Statutes Chapter 163, part of which states:
Provide that public facilities and services meet or exceed the standards
established in the Capital Improvements Element required by F.S. 163.3177
and are available when neededfor the development, or that development
orders and permits are conditioned on the availability of these public
facilities and services necessary to serve the proposed development. Not
later than one year after its due date established by the state land planning
agency's rule for submission of local comprehensive plans pursuant to
F.S.163.3167(2), a local government shall not issue a development order or permit
which results in a reduction in the level of services for the effected public facilities
below the level of services provided in the comprehensive plan of the local government.
Table 1
City of Edgewater
Capital Improvement Schedule
Fiscal Years Ending 1A}(}9 20lJ
l'1<'J~ II [,H OJI "),;>r f{,laJ
~ 2009-2010 ZU1U.20ll 20ll.lull 2012.2013
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Vchicle RcplacemeOl S20Ii,OOO.OQ ~GG;GOOOO $350,000.00 $200,000.00 S l,051i,000.00
12 Lead/ EKG Monitor $25,000.00 $25,000.00
Genisis Extrication Tool System $30,000.00 $30,000.00
Self Contained Breathcr Apparatus $100,000.00 $100,000.00
Fire DeDI. Totals 5306,000.00 ~ $350,000.00 530,000.00 $325,000.00 51,211,000.00
POLICE DEPARTMENT:
Vchiclc Replacemcnl $103,611i.00 $113,000.00 SS4;OOG:OO ~QMG $112,000.00 $467,liHi.OO
, . .. . &SQ;QQ(MlQ S80,000.00
.. ~ ~ ~G:OO $200,000.00
Police DePI. Totals 5183,616.00 $312,000.00 $84,000.00 $56,000.00 $112,000.00 $747,616.00
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES:
Vchicle Rcplacement $209,750.00 $ 11 0,000.00 $770,000.00 $620,000.00 $750,000.00 S2,759,750.00
Wastewater Slip Iininl! S:WO,OOO.OO S2Q1l;QOO;OO
Bsr ScreeA 'XWfP S120,1l00.00 ~OO,OO
.~~ ~ ~ &W-l,4{lQ,OO ~OO,OO $2,101,400.00
Rctrofit Lift Station1, 2, H S70,GOO.OQ S 10,000.00 $70,000.00 ~OO,OO
2) 25 1-11' Compressors WWTP S30,OOO.OQ ~QG:OO
Westem Storage Tank & Pump Station S130,000.00 WG,OOMQ
\'{/\VfP Rehab/Replaccment $3,000,000.00 $3,000,000.00 $6,000,000.00
2.5 MGD Wastewaler TreatmeOl PlaOl $1,000,000.00 $7,500,000.00 $6,500,000.00 $ 15,000,000.00
SE Service Area Reclaimed Improvements $350,000.00 55,000,000.00 $5,350,000.00
ART wells 17,18,19,20 $1,210,931.00 $1,219,931.00
AeralOr and stainva\' rep]acemeOl ~G:OO ~QQ,OO
Claricone Paintinl! s-lOO;(jllMQ SHlO;{lQG:OO
Rcp]acemeOl of 2" Water Lines S40,IlOO.00 S4G;QQMQ
Western Reclaimed Water Main Extension ~G;GOOOO S3,500,000.OQ $3,850,000.00
Sliplininl!. exisitnl! pipcs-Wildwood Subdivision $25,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $210,000.00 $295,000.00
Eastern Shores Project $96,750.00 S96,750.0Q
Environmental Services TOlals $2,378,831.1l0 $G,30S,000.00 $13,370,000.00 $8,150,900.00 $7,%0,900.00 $37,663,831.00
LEISURE SERVICES:
Vchicle Replacement ~QMQ ~QMQ $30,000.00 $148,000.00 ~MG
,'Aims! Shelter ~MQ ~G,OOG:OO
" ~ . S183,175.0Q $183,175.00
Kenned\' Park Rcnnovations S2SS,OOO.OQ $290,000.00 ~OO,OO
DOl! Park $50,000.00 $50,000.00
Mango Lake Park $500,000.00 SWG,OOMQ
Harper Liquid Cooled Dcwees Slope Mowcr ~G:OO $25,000
Parks and Recrealion Totals $688,175.1l0 $50,000.00 $68,000.00 $30,000.00 $988,000.90 $1,821,175
PUBLIC WORKS:
. -;- '"' ~QMQ ~OO,OO
-. - '.....d' - ~OO,OO ~QG,OO
~Oth Stre~t Side t. filiI $ 1 S7,711i.0Q $157,7Hi.00
Road Rcpaving $33S,27::!.OQ ~~Q S475,OOO.00 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 S2,260,272.0Q
Public Works Totals $617,988.00 $515,000.00 $475,000.00 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 $2,607,988.00
All Proiects Totals $1,071,lil0.oo $7,182,000.00 $11,341,000.00 $8, 766,000.00 $9,38S,00ll.00 $14,051,610.00
Sourcc: City of Edgcwafcr Planning Division, 2008.
Table 1
City of Edgewater
Capital Improvement Schedule
Fiscal Years Ending 2010-2014
h~caJ y, ar
P[I,j( (J 200!l-20W 20W-20ll 201l-20ll 2012-20)3 20)3-20)4 T.,(..J
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Vehiclc Rcplacement S - S 350,000 S - S 200,000 S 40,000 ~ 590,000
12 Lead/ EKG Monitor 25,000 25,000
Gcnisis Extrication Tool System 30,000 30,000
Self Contained Breather Apparatus 100,000 100,000
Fire Dept. TOlals S - $ 350,000 $ 30,000 $ 325,000 $ 40,000 $ 745,000
POLICE DEPARTMENT:
Vehicle Replacement
Police Dept. Totals
S
$
84,000
84,000
S
$
112,000
112,000
S
$
411,990
411,990
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES:
Vehicle Replacement $ 304,500 S 770,000 S 620,000 S 750,000 S 250,000 S 2,694,500
Retrofit Lilt Station I, 2,5- 283,000 70,000 353,000
Western Storage Tank & Pump Stmion 130,000 130,000
SE Stora 'e Tank & Pumo Station 1,200,000 1,200,000
w\VfP Rehab/Replacement 3,000,000 3,000,000
2.5 MGD Wastcwater Treatment Plant 1,000,000 7,500,000 6,500,000 15,000,000
SE Service Area Reclaimcd Improvcments 5,000,000 5,000,000
AmmonialOrs WTP 25,000 25,000
Wells 21-24 and raw water mains 2,300,000 2,300,000
ART wells 17,18,19,20 1,800,000 1 ,800,000
Aerator and stairway replacement 150,000 150,000
Replacement of 2' Water Lines 50,000 50,000
Western Reclaimed Water Main Extension 3,500,000 3,500,000
Wildwood Subdivision - sliplining 30,000 30,000 210,000 270,000
Undesignated Proiects 250,000 250,000
eastern ;)nores I-rolect 680,073 680,073
Environmental Services TOlals $ 4,692,573 $ 13,500,000 $ 8,150,000 $ 7,460,000 $ 2,600,000 $ 36,402,573
LEISURE SERVICES:
Vehicle Replacement S - ~ 68,000 S 30,000 S 148,000 S 50,000 S 296,000
Kennedy Park Rennovations 290,000 290,000
Dog Park 50,000 50,000
Mango Lake Park 500,000 500,000
Parks and Recreation Totals $ - $ 68,000 $ 30,000 $ 988,000 $ 50,000 $ 1,136,000
PUBLIC WORKS:
Road Repaving S 102,000 S 475,000 S 500,000 S 500,000 S 500,000 S 2,077,000
Signalizc SR442 @ 1-95 287,546 287,546
30th Street Sidewalk 157,716 157,716
Public Works Totals $ 102,000 $ 632,716 $ 787,546 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 2,522,262
All Projects Totals $ 4,869,563 $ 14,634,716 $ 9,053,546 $ 9,385,000 $ 3,275,000 $ 41,217,825
Source: City of Edgewater Planning Division, 2009.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
TOTAL
FUNDING SOURCES woa-oo FY09-10 FY10-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FIVE YEARS
General Fund
General Fund Revenues $ $ 225,000 $ $ 3(},Q00 $ 125,000 $ 38l),OOQ
COBG Grant 87,461 87, 461
-E-GHO Grant 8J~~ 84{},900 923,175
FROAP Grant 20Q,QOO 20(},Q00
FOOT Grant- 30th Street Sidewall; l.t-1l,28-7 118~
Prior Year Appropriations 5~ 582,240
~eRati9R-lmpaGt-F-ees 8(},QOO 8MOO
Police Impact Fees 8Q,Q00 80,000
Local Option Gas Tax 45(},Q00 475;QOQ 50(},Q00 SOO;QOO 1,925,000
-ReGFeati9R-lm~e6 155;Q00 155,000
Debt Proceeds 309;&W 50&,(l0Q 50&,(lQQ 8MOQ 16(},Q00 l,859;&W
General Fund Totals 1,69&;1+0 1,177,000 e77,OOO 6ti;{)OO 1,lm;OO() 6,390,779
Water and Sewer Fund
-m\ereE:t Earnings 50,OOQ S(},QOO
Transfer from Water Development 783,558 2,13(},QOQ 370,000 3,286,558
Transfer from Sewer Development ~ 70(},QOQ 4,SO(},Q00 7,50(},Q00 €i,50l),OOO 19,787,373
-#aAcfer from OperatiR~
of RevenueE: 4S(},QOQ 40(},Q00 400;Q00 40(},QQO 40(},Q00 2,05(},Q00
-PropfietafY-Ap~FiatiGA5 25(},Q00 220,000 J50;Q00 820,000
Debt Proceeds 161,lS0 3,05(},Q00 8,070,000 11,2!ll,150
Water and Sewer Fund Totals 2,282,084 6,280,000 1 J,J40,OOO 8,120,000 7,250,000 37,272,081
Stormwater Fund
-maion Rivor LogGGR-Idcenco Plote 16,75Q 16,750
Proprietory II.PPfGpfia.tieRS 25,000 3l),OOO 3(},QOQ 21O,QOQ 29S,OQO
-Gesl-SI:lOre Gront 8l),OOO S(},QQO
Stormwater Fund Totals 96,750 25,000 30,000 30,000 210,000 391,750
Total Revenues from All Sources $ 4,074,&1-0 $ 7,482,000 $ 14,347,000 $ 8,766,000 $ 9,JiS,OOO $ 44,054,&10
Sources of Revenue
Stormwater-NJRa
Wo
GeAefaI-F-tolA8-
-1-a!Vo
/<.,,,_.-~-~-'. ~~ ~. '.
r ..'
.. - -,
~ -..--- . -
- '
iOGeneral Fund 1
IrnWater and Sewer Fund I
IOStormwater Fund ...1
WaIeHlnG-Sewer-NlA8
84!Vo
_____~__n.___'" ......______-.-J
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
TOTAL
FUNDING SOURCES FY09-10 FY10-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FIVE YEARS
General Fund
General Fund Revenues $ 74,990 $ 502,000 $ 403,546 $ 635,000 $ 175,000 $ 1,790,536
FRDAP Grant 790,000 790,000
DOT Grant 157,716
Prior Year Appropriations 102,000 102,000
Local Option Gas Tax 475,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 1,975,000
General Fund Totals $ 176,990 $ 1,134,716 $ 903,546 $ 1,925,000 $ 675,000 $ 4,815,252
Water and Sewer Fund
OperatinQ Revenues $ 294,096 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,344,096
Transfer from Water Development 250,000 2,952,500 3,950,000 3,605,000 1,150,000 11,907,500
Transfer from Sewer Development 63,389 2,822,500 3,950,000 3,605,000 1,150,000 11,590,889
CDSG Grant 100,515 100,515
State RevolvinQ Funds 3,000,000 3,000,000
Debt Proceeds 7,475,000 7,475,000
Water and Sewer Fund Totals $ 3,708,000 $ 13,500,000 $ 8,150,000 $ 7,460,000 $ 2,600,000 $ 35,418,000
Refuse Fund
OperatinQ Revenues $ 304,500 $ $ $ $ $ 304,500
Refuse Fund Totals $ 304,500 $ $ $ $ $ 304,500
Storm water Fund
OperatinQ Revenues $ 156,713 $ $ $ $ $ 156,713
SJRWMD Grant 523,360 523,360
Stormwater Fund Totals $ 680,073 $ $ $ $ $ 680,073
Total Revenues from All Sources $ 4,869,563 $ 14,634,716 $ 9,053,546 $ 9,385,000 $ 3,275,000 $ 41,217,825
Sources of Revenue
-l
Refuse
1%
Stormwater Fund
1%
DGeneral Fund
[iWaler and Sewer Fund
o Refuse
o Stormwater Fund
SUMMARY OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Facility Type FY08-09 FY0910 fY10 11 FY11 12 FY12 13 Total
FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14
Fire Department $~ $JQG;OOQ S350,000 $JG,OOQ ~ $1,211,000
$350,000 $30,000 $325,000 $40.000 $745,000
Police Department lBJ,6-:1.6 ~OO 84;OOQ aa,oog ~OO 147,616
$74.990 $84,000 $56,000 $112.000 $85,000 $411.990
Environmental Services 2,:H8,831 6,305,000 13,370,000 8,150,000 7,460,000 37,663,831
$4,692.573 $13.500,000 $8.150.000 $7.460,000 $2,600.000 $36.402.573
Leisure Services 688, 175 aQ,QOO 6S;OOQ JMOO 983,OOQ 1,824,175
$68,000 $30,000 $988.000 $50,000 $1 ,136,000
Public Works 617,988 515,000 475,000 500,000 500,000 2,607,988
$102.000 $632,716 $787.546 $500.000 $500,000 $2.522,262
Total Capital $4,014,&10 $7,482,000 $14,347,000 $8,766,000 $9,385,000 $44,054,&10
Improvements $4.869.563 $14.634.716 $9.053.546 $9.385.000 $3.275.000 $41.217.825
SUMMARY OF COMMITTED AND PLANNED FUNDS
Fund FY 08 09 FY09 10 FY1011 FY11 12 FY12 13 Total
FY09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14
General Fund $1,695, 779 $1,177,000 $977,000 $616,000 $1,925,000 $6,390,779
$176,990 $1,134,716 $903,546 $1 ,925,000 $675,000 $4.815,252
Water and Sewer Fund 2,282,081 6,280,000 13,340,000 8,120,000 7,250,000 37,272,081
3.708,000 13.500.000 8,150,000 7.460.000 2.600.000 35.418.000
Refuse Fund 304.500 304.500
Stormwater Fund 9&;1W ~ JQ,OOQ JMOO 210,000 391,750
680,073 680,073
Total Committed and
Planned Funds $4,OH,610 $7,482,000 $14,347,000 $8,766,000 $9,385,000 $44,054,610
$4.869.563 $14.634.716 $9.053.546 $9.385.000 $3.275.000 $41.217.825
ww
ww
... ...
N 0,0,
0 0101
0 01 01
IX> 01 01
N tntn
0 IX> IX>
0 00
lD mOl
Q 0101
\l 66
n 00
::r-
oo
~
VI
~ ~ s:o^ ;:0
~ 0 00 0 CD '0
CD ~ :J (Q :J 00
~ J- (Q \l :J a.
D r Ooo2i :E
I;~'< 00
c C '<
(Q en ^ \l ro
::!" m CD ~ VI
TI en \l ^ c
c ~ ;:0 .~
:J 00
a. ^ CD n
W :J S'
0
w < (Q
... !:l;
&.
01 o'
01 :J
01 VI
&. \l
IX> ::r
0 00
m VI
CD
01 =
6
0
<a.
...
j .)
~
~ ~
-.j -.j
01 01
0 .0
0 0
.9 8
~
01 u:;
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
.9 .9
~
...
w U:;~N u:;
.;.. 001lD 0
0 000 0
0 000, .0
0 000 0
0 88.9 8
--' hdUUI
...
(j;
N
0
0
lD
,,1:
... n
,g,o
III c::
n ;:,
-~
z;:,
c::lQ
3 en
D'~
III -.
... ;:,
lQ
(
\l
...
.~.
III
n
..
Z
tI
3
III
Z
"TI1ll
-<:I:
~"ll
0'"
co .E.
o III
- on
CD;
{f;
N
0
0
CD
0
...
, 0
{f;
N
0
...
~
...
...
,
{f;
N
0
...
...
.
...
N
.
{f;
N
0
...
N
.
...
to)
,
~ -I
0
Dr
in
C
en
m
en
w w w
w w w
.... .... ....
6 , 0
00
0 00
0 00
0 00
w WCA
IX> IX> IX>
lD .... ....
<b o 0
00
0 .... ....
, ~~
....
... .;...;..
~ C\l G)
0 :J ::!. .m
~ -0
c ., :J
:J en
r 0.-<
en CD CD TI
a.~ c
0 -)> :J
C T11:J a.
;u ~1:J
0 C D TI
m ro1:J ;:0
en -< 5l' 0
)>
CD ::::!". \l
00 0
-. :J G)
ro VI m
< a
CD
:J
C
CD
t t
t ~
~ ~
i .j
I HH~H
w
w
....
6 )to
0 n
0 C'l
0 0
w c::
;:,
IX> ~
....
0 ;:,
OlQ
-;en
.... ..
.;.. ...
5'
IC
;u
III
<
III
~ ;:,
c::
CD
Z
Bl
3
III
Z
"TI III
-< t
N
0"
00
co ~.
bill
- CDn
..
IIJ
{f;
N
0
0
<<p
...
. 0
{f;
N
0
...
~
...
...
,
{f;
N
0
...
...
.
...
to.)
,
{f;
N
0
...
N
.
...
to)
,
t -I
0
Dr
in
en
o
C
:I'
o
m
en
"TI
<:
m
-<0
m::j
J--<
:Do
O"TI
~m
::jo
:pc;)
rm
z-:E
03::P
:p"n1
"ll :D :D
::jo.
:P<"TI
r m r
,,3:0
;um;u
o~a
t..\l:P
~~
-Iz
"TI
C
Z
o
www w w w w W w W
www w W w w w w W
.... ... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
m ' , , I , , 6 I 6 6
UlO1Ul Ul Ul Ul 0
0. UlO1Ul Ul Ul Ul 0 0 0 0
to Ul 01 Ul Ul Ul Ul )> 0 0 0 0
ro UlO1Ul Ul Ul Ul "0 n 0 0 0 0
:E &,&.&. &, &, &, .. n iN iN iN iN
Ql CI) co CI) CI) CI) CI) .2. 0 CI) CI) CI) CI)
~ 000 0 0 0 et C .... .... .... ....
mo>m in m m n :::I C 6 6 6 6
() .. .. en
UlO1Ul Ul Ul Ul z :i" .... .... .... ....
lJ bbb 6 6 6 m 6 6 ~ ,
clO en ....
:!! 000 0 0 0 3 en 0 0 ~ ~
Z IT~
}> et -.
... :::I
r. lC
"
C
:J
0.
W
~ -1~O^ w ~ )J -I -I , " 0
OQlOro 0 0 0 Ql 0 )J 0
&, -I :J lC :J :T :J Ql -I :J 0 0 -I
Ul JIo to "U a: ~ Q!.. 0. JIo VI Q!.. }>
Ul ,owo. i;r :E , ~ 0 lJ G>
Ul c!;;" ~'< ro ro Ql Ql
&, '< en G>
~ -. ~
CI) en'" lJ CJl ro 0 a ci" Ql
0 m ro ~ CJl )J VI c 3 :J ~
in enlJ '" a: ~ c :tJ G>
Ul Ql )J ro ~ =1. 0 G> Ql
6 ~ 11l :E ~ Ql m ro VI
0 :J
0 :J Ql :5 en -I
0 ;;c ro
< ;b to ~ Ql
!!!. "0 )(
.. ro
o. Ul .2. " VI
:J II> C
:J
VI n 0.
lJ ..
:r Z
Ql III
VI 3
ro II>
=
a
~
~
~
~
fA
Z
~fD
...,==
0"0
:E .2.
~~
011
....
o
~
o
o
o
fA
fA
...,
c
~.....
-oJcp
Ul .....
0.....
o
8
IFI
~
Ol ~
W -oJ
~ Ul
"-oJ 0
.... 0
Ol 0
fA
...,
c
~~! E
~ 0
018
IFI
-oJ ~ Ul
CI) CI) 0
-oJ -oJ 0
u,U,0
~~o
0l0l0
fA
fA
....
WUl~N
~0c.n<D
0000
0000
0000
8888
...,
c
01.....
o';.l
0.....
OW
o
o
W Ul-oJ
~U10<D
0000
0000
0000
0000
....
....
(j;
N
o
o
<D
~ ~~
~~Ul~N~I~; ~
~g~~~~:::JiF
NOOO "-oJu, 0
OlOOO....~O
~o880l0l0
fA
Ul Ul
o 0
o 0
o 0
o 0
o 0
Y>
W
wWC,o-.J..-J.
OlW-oJ<DUl
~-oJUlO-oJ
NU,OO"-oJ
0l~00""
~0l000l
Ul
-oJ
"-oJ
....
Ol
~
:;;
0
0 ~
0
0 n
?! I'D
0
~ c:
, :::I
<D ..
~ :i"
U:I
.... en
~
:i"
lC
4:l
Q
-<
ro
~
}>
1;)
1;)
a
~
2r :tJ
o. CD
:J <
VI CD
:::I
C
CD
Z
D>
3
CD
fA Z
." II>
-< ==
N
.... 0-0
0 0'"
~ CD s..
0 ~CD
0 on
0 11
fA
N
0
.....
cp
.....
.....
I
fA
N
0
.....
.....
.
....
N
,
EA
N
C
....
';.l
....
w
,
En
N
C
....
If
.....
~
,
""
-I
0
.... Er
0
~ iF
0
0
0
in
o
C
:tJ
o
m
en
en
-I
0"
:tJ-
3::<
m
~<O
JIom-
nlJlo~
:tJ::IIo
CO"
-IJIom
r=~Cl
--1(;)
~JIom
O~~
JIo3::JIo
-0-0-1
-::11m
~o;c
,<"
-om,
::113::0
Om::ll
c..zc
m-l)>
0-0
-I~
t!z
z
Cl
N
o
o
())
I
N
o
o
to
(')
1]
C)
~
Ql
~
l/l
l/l
-
~.
^
Cll
:T
...,
o
C
to
~
'TI
c
::l
a.
~
~
~
I
CJ1
CJ1
CJ1
CJ1
I
CJ1
())
o
m
CJ1
I
o
o
o
-.
......
......
(j;
N
o
o
(!)
~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~:::':::':::':::'~Jl>~:::'
:::.~:::.~~~~~~~~
I I I . I I . I . I I
CJ1CJ1CJ1CJ1CJ1CJ1CJ1CJ1(J'lCJ1CJ1
(J'lCJ1CJ1CJ1(J'l(J'l(J'l(J'lCJ1CJ1CJ1
CJ1(J'l(J'lCJ1(J'l(J'l(J'l(J'lCJ1C11CJ1
CJ1C11C11C11C11C11CJ1C11CJ1CJ1CJ1
I . . I I . I I I I I
CJ1CJ1CJ1CJ1CJ1CJ1CJ1(J1CJ1(J1CJ1
())())())())())())())OO())())OO
00000000000
. I . . . . . . . . .
0'l0'l0'l0'l0'l0'l0'l0'l0'l0'l0'l
~~~~~~~~~~~
I I I . I I I I . I I
-I.~~~~.....a......a.~.....a......a......a.
00000000000
-I
o
-I
~
I
C
en
m
en
;u ;U ~
Cll Cll Ql
'0 -
... l/l
or 0 r0-
C) ...., )
Cll ;:;: ~
3 r- Ql
~ -
Cll Cll
::l l/l ...,
- 9I ~
0
-. 0" u'
~ ::l :i"
~ ...... 5"
Ql N to
-
Cll
...,
r-
5'
Cll
l/l
~
~ ~
~ '1J n
I
CJ1 .. n
(J1 .2- 0
(J'l CD C
CJ1 n ::s
I .. ..
CJ1 Z :i'
())
0 cco
G> 3 en
~ 1:7':;-
I
...... III -.
0 ... ::s
co
);>
;u
-l
~
~
(jj
......
-J
...... '1J
()) ...
0
- ....
...... CD
to n
..
N Z
0 Dl
3
CD
Z
" CD
-< ~
- t.)
0"tJ
0'"
. ClCl .E.
o CD
on
CD..
~ CIl
{:fl
t.)
0
0
CD
I
~
I 0
{:fl
t.)
0
~
0
I
~
I ~
{:fl
t.)
0
~
~
I
~
I t.)
{:fl
t.)
0
~
t.)
0
~
I to)
III
- I->- -I
0
S ...
Dl
- iii
~
c
en
m
en
~
o
~
)>
I
en
o
c
::0
o
m
en
l:>
:::.
:::.
I
o
o
o
o
I
W
())
(!)
I
(!)
o
I
......
N
~:::.
:::.:::.
:::.:::.
I I
00
00
00
00
I I
W W
()) ())
...... ......
I I
00
~l:>
~!.
WN
~ )>
~ n
n
0
c
::s
...
S'
en
en
..
~.
::s
en
n
( "
CD
<
III
::s
c
CD
Z
Dl
3
CD
~ Z
" ftl
-< ~
t.) 0"tJ
0'"
ClCl .E.
I ftl
on
CD...
1Il
{:fl
t.)
0
0
CD
I
~
0
I
{:fl
t.)
0
~
0
I
~
~
I
{:fl
t.)
0
~
~
I
~
t.)
I
{:fl
t.)
0
~
t.)
0
~
to)
I
~ -I
0
...
Dl
iii
-I -I
..., ...,
Ql Ql
::l ::l
l/l l/l
-. ....,
C1l C1l
... ...
- -.
..., ...
o 0
3 3
Cf)~
C1l Ql
~ -
C1l C1l
..., ...,
00
C1l C1l
< <
o C1l C1l
00
'0'0
3 3
C1l C1l
::l ::l
- -
i IIU
~ ~
t t
i I
i I.
i iUII
en
o
c
:1J
o
m
en
"
m
Z
m
:e"
~<
1m
GO.<o
"m:::j
m)>-<
"tJ"o
10"
~~ m
m:Eo
3:-IQ
m>m
z!::e
-13:>
0"tJ-I
>;;om
:EO}'
-1<"
>m,
13:0
"tJm"
"z-
0-10
(.."tJ>
~>
-IZ
"
C
Z
o
m
a.
<0
m
~
Ql
~
~ ~~ "" ~~ tt ~ tttt t
t ~~ "" ~~ t
~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~
&. en&. &. (no, 0,0, &. &a&. en 0, &.
<.n <.n <.n <.n <.n <.n <.n <.n <.n <.n<.n<.n<.n <.n
<.n <.n <.n <.n <.n <.n <.n <.n <.n <.n<.n<.n<.n <.n
<.n <.n<.n <.n <.n<.n <.n <.n <.n <.n<.n<.n<.n <.n
&. &.&. &. 0,0, 0,0, &. 0.0.0.0, &.
OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ
0 00 0 00 00 0 0000 0
m !! m mm mm m menenen !
! ! !! ~! ! !t!~
0 00 0 00 00 0 0000 0
()
=0
:!!
z
)>
!.
"
C
:J
a.
~
~
~
&.
01
01
01
&.
OJ
o
m
01
6
o
::0
m
1il
o
m
3
m
a
en en~)>c:!
mmm::o;::-m
en::o=-1enQl
mmln:;;-
<n.~m~
o' 91. ~ ft g
"3 . ~ ~ ;::;~"
~~Ql.-,j",,~
Ql !ll. 15. 0; 101
::0 ~ iil. ::0
l!:SQ~<o~
1il 0 ~. Ql
3'iil*~0"
rCDco-'
:j"o.-o3
m 3" C Ql
In " 3 S'
a In
i% en
3 ~
m ci"
:J :J
Ui
~'"
Ou.
~5:
~Gl
CO
en~
mQl
en In
CD
~
Ql
~
~ ~ ~
m m Ql
In In In
CD CD CD
3 3 ~
~SQCD
n Q :,
f[~ CD
3 m Ql
~a;l3
Ql:Jm
~~;~
:J5:-o1il
~. c a
:J 3 ::0
~~ ~
~ fir ~
~. g: ~
o :J
:J
CC:
:J -
0.-
m en
In -
_. ~
:J o'
Ql :J
CD'"
0.::0
-Om
"'-0
o -
'Ql
m 0
5!m
In 3
m
a
~ I -:;:
a I~! co~
o~
~ o<.no oOJ
000 00
00 0 00
o.s 0 .s.s
~~ i~1 I
" 0 -::J
00 ow 0
00 000 0
00 000 0
00 000 0
.so o.s 0 .s
~~
01 <.n
00
00
00
00
00
i~
01<.n
00
00
00
00
00
Y>
N N
w c:;; W
01 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
.s .s .s
~
Ui
N
o
o
CD
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~
("J-" __
NC11W C".) c.n~N~
"--.Jou,~OI\J"::: _OtvWCXI~-"
010 ow 0 <.n~ "'<.n 0 OOOCO <.n
coo 00 0 o<.n 00 0 oooco 0
000000000000000
000000000000000
00 o.s o.s.s o.s.s o.s.s.s 0
t
~
&.
Ul ,,~
<.n
<.n
~ .. 0
OJ ,*. g
0
m o :l
..... .....
! z :i"
!:lQ
0 3 CIl
C"!::;'
III -.
.. :l
lQ
-0
..
.9.
III
0
..
Z
m
3
<II
...
0
0
'" 'P
Ul .....
0 0
0
0
...
0
.....
?
.....
....
...
0
.....
.....
.
.....
...
...
0
.....
':->
.....
t.>
...
0
.....
It'
.....
~
Y>
-I
0
'" 6r
<.n iii
0
0
0
u
c
CIl
m
CIl
ttttt
~~~~~
bbbbo
00000
00000
~~~~~
~~~~~
o~~*~
6~~!..J;.
o~~ow
t
~
o~
00
w8
~3
~~
J:,.c5
"'CIl
.....
...
3'
lQ
~oen()-I-I::;"
Om::ooiiliilQl
~S?:"0l:J:J:J
~-oGlGllnln~
ra~G>~~~
~~aQ]aaa
~~~a333
()ln15. oen~
m In mQl
CIl ~~CD
~ ~ .., XI
S' 0 0 ~
m m III
::0 i% i% :l
moo!:
<-0-0<11
~ 3 3 Z
C m m m
lJl a a ~
Y> Y>
W w l::
:..... O~N NO
o OOCDC1lO1'P
OJ oo~WO.....
o OtnOWOO
o 0......<0000
o OUlC1lCDO
Y> Y>
.....
'" "
.....".1:.
o "
o<.n
00
00
00
...
",,,,0
",".I:.tn~
0lJ\)(J11
~~~~
000
000
Y>
Y>
."
<.n
o
o
o
o
o
...
WWO
NCn~::
U1 N l\.) .
O<J1c.n....
000'"
000
000
Y>
Y>
C1l
tn
o
o
o
o
o
...
~ .oW ~
~~~~
OU1c.n~
000t.>
000
000
Y>
Y>
'"
i..>
<.n
o
o
o
o
N
..... 0
VJOO~
01'\)"'-
oc.nc.n~
OOO~
000
000
Y>
Y>
W
t\J -,j W
.....".1:.0
<.n"0
OJ <.nO
000
000
000
00-1
.....i..>Ntn~
0~C1l""
o~o"iii
~~~g:
UlC1l CD 0
CIl
o
c
;II
o
m
CIl
;0
m
Z
m
:E:!!
~<
rm
llO<n
;om=i
m~-<
,,;00
~n"
n~m
m!!o
s:-IG')
m)>m
z~:E
~S:)>
n"~
)>;om
"0;0
=i<-"
)>mr
rs:o
-om;o
;oz-
0-10
c...,,)>
~~
-IZ
"
C
Z
o
N
o
o
())
tv
o
o
to
()
\)
o
::r
OJ
::1
en
~
~
Cll
:T
a
c:
1O
::r
;;
c:
:J
a.
.j:>
.j:>
())
ell
CJl
CJl
CJl
ell
())
o
en
CJl
6
o
.j:>
.j:>
()) J>
ell '1Jn
CJl a n
CJl ~. 0
CJl III C
ell n ~ C
()) ....~ en
0 z~ m
en clO en
CJl 3 CIl
6 C"~
0 III -.
... ~
(C
~ mCll
0 OJ =-
~ en '0
J> ~~
r :J :J
C CIllO
en ::rCll
m o ~
en iil !!l
en S
\)1O
a~ '1J
~.'O ...
Cll Cll ~,
n.en ID
n
~ ..
z
c: III
:E 3
0 ID
0
a.
en
c:
0-
a.
<:
Vi
(5
:J
~
Z
-nID
-<~
~'1J
0'"
CXl ~,
, ID
on
CD..
fJl
J i t-.l
0
0
If'
.....
0
~ ~
W t-.l
0
0 .....
W "'0 ~
0 0 .....
"'0 0 .....
0 . 0
0 .9
~ ~
W t-.l
0
0 .....
W "'0 .....
,
0 0 .....
"'0 . 0 t-.l
0 0
0 0
ffi ffi
N t-.l
..... 0
N 0 .....
"'0 t-.l
..... ,
0 0 .....
"'0 0 w
0 . 0
0 0
i ~
N ~
lO 0
CJl
"'0 ~
0 iE
0
0
.9
st
.....
.....
Ui
t;j
o
o
lO
~
o
~
J>
r
CIl
o
C
Xl
()
m
en
t ~
~ I
~ I
I \,
1111
J>
n
n
0
c
~
..
:i'
lD
en
..
...
5'
lO
~
~
D
3'
a Xl
ID
<
ID
~
I:
ID
Z
Ql
3
ID
'"
Z
-nlll
-<~
~'1J
0'"
CXl ~.
, lD
- On
g <<I..
fJl
~
t-.l
0
0
If'
.....
. 0
~
t-.l
0
.....
~
.....
.....
.
~
t-.l
0
.....
.....
,
.....
t-.l
.
~
t-.l
0
.....
':'J
.....
w
.
~
0
~
iE
CIl
o
c
Xl
o
m
CIl
CIl
~
O-n
Xl-
3=:<
:Er:"
J>~g
~J>-'
~Xl~
cC)-n
~:tom
;=3!c
-~(j)
:;! :to m
C)~:E
:to3=::to
'1J '1J ~
- Xl m
~O~
r<-n
'1Jmr
Xl3=: 0
OmXl
t.,.z-
m ~ C
C)'1J:to
~!;
~z
z
c
m
c.
co
ll>
:E
Ol
~
." )>-
n
.. n
~, 0
III C
n ::l
.. ..
Z ;'
cca
3 en
D" q-
III ;'
.. ca
."
..
0
'iii'
n
..
Z
Dl
3
III
'"
C
c
If'
~
c
'"
c
~
cp
~
~
'"
c
~
~
.
~
'"
'"
c
~
':J
~
w
'"
c
~
If
~
.,.
-I
0
61
iii
tt
lDlD
bJ&.
(J1(J1
(J1(J1
(J1(J1
ci.c.n
())())
00
en en
(J1 (J1
66
00
()
"0
"
Z
):>
r.
"
c
::l
C.
.I>-
.I>-
CD
en
(J1
(J1
(J1
en
())
o
en
(J1
6
o
-Imcn
OM:='
-1",-0
J>o ll> 5
...-3 co
ccn\!l
CIl=r-
mO~
CIlm5
",co
"0-0
a"6
~,ll>
ll> '"
~
YJ
YJ
~
0101
()) ())
00
00
...., ....,
ww,
En
YJ
w W
o 0
'0.0
o 0
.9 .9
YJ
En
w w
o 0
010
o 0
.9 .9
YJ
Ell
~ ~
o 0
010
o 0
.9 .9
YJ
En
~
-'
iJi
i\5
o
o
CD
,En 01:
(J1())"'"
000
000
""'....,0
wwo
c
CIl
m
CIl
)>-
n
n
0
c:
::l
~,
::l
ca
CIl
..
..
;'
ca
::0
III
<
III
::l
C
III
Z
Dl
3
III
'"
C
c
If'
~
0
'"
0
~
cp
~
~
'"
0
~
~
.
~
'"
'"
0
~
':J
~
w
'"
0
~
If
~
.,.
-I
0
Iii
iii
.I>- .I>-
.I>- .I>-
lD lD
66
o 0
00
o 0
ww
()) ())
-' -'
66
.I>- -'
J,. ~
()) .I>-
-I-Icn
o Ql '-
-I ::l :;0
)>- '" ~
"'-!!s:
CIl-.0
o a G)
c 3 Ql
~ 0 ~
rn ll>
~
5'
En
01
()) (J1
0 01
0 -....,
...., ......
w W
En
W W
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
YJ
YJ
(J1
N
W
<.."
01
o
YJ
YJ
w w
00
00
00
00 ,
YJ
En
N N
-' ......
00
00
00
00 ,
YJ
En
En En
lD.I>-(J1
(J1 N N
OOlW
0-""'<""
....,......01
wwo
(J)
o
c
:D
(')
m
CIl
CIl
-I
Oon
~<
:Er;n
)>- m< !2:;!
-I
m)>-
:;0:;00
cOon
-IJ>om
;=3!c
--ICl
:;! )>- m
O!::E
;pi!:>
.".,,-1
-:;om
~o;o
...-<on
."m...-
:;oi!:O
Om:;o
t...ze
m-l>
0'"
-I~
~z
Z
c