12-20-1999 - Regular
'W
...
,
,
CITY COUNCIL OF EDGEWATER
REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 20, 1999
7:00 P.M.
COMMUNITY CENTER
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Schmidt called the Regular Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in
the community Center.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Donald Schmidt
Councilman James Brown
Councilman Dennis Vincenzi
Councilwoman Harriet Rhodes
Councilwoman Judith Lichter
City Attorney Nikki Clayton
City Manager Kenneth Hooper
City Clerk Susan Wadsworth
Police Chief Lawrence Schumaker
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
INVOCATION, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
There was a silent invocation and pledge of allegiance to the
Flag.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Reqular Meetinq of December 6, 1999
Councilman Vincenzi made a motion to approve the December 6, 1999
minutes, second by Councilwoman Rhodes. The motion CARRIED 5-0.
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/PLAQUES
A. Adopt-a-Street, Joseph Brzuska, Chamber's Litter Prevention
Chairman
Mr. Joseph Brzuska commented on the Litter Prevention Committee.
He spoke about Keep America Beautiful. He spoke about the
reasons why people litter and the goals they want to reach. He
then went over the Adopt-a-Street Program in New Smyrna Beach.
Councilwoman Lichter stated she and Lynne Plaskett are on this
Committee with the Chamber and the Litter Committee. She is
hoping on their goal setting night that she could bring this up
as one of their immediate goals. She is perfectly willing to put
the time into this project if Council decides it would be a good
one. with Lynne's help and maybe the Beautification Committee's
help they could take this on. She and Lynne have talked in the
past and they thought of a couple of business streets, not main
highways, that might be good targets.
Mayor Schmidt feels this is a good idea. Councilwoman Lichter
spoke about a Boy Scout troop taking a particular street or a
service organization might take a particular street. She spoke
about legal implications that New Smyrna Beach is working through
that will be to our benefit.
Mayor Schmidt suggested to Mr. Hooper keeping this in mind when
they have the meeting with the other cities. They could tie it
all together and get Southeast as a big community. They have
their goal setting session January 10th and Councilwoman Lichter
would be a good contact person. Mr. Brzuska stated he is
available anytime.
'-'
.."",.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Mike Visconti, 316 pine Breeze Drive, spoke about the widening of
SR 442. He urged the Council to take back our City from the
Department of Transportation. He spoke about the medians being
decorated at Christmas time for the citizens to enjoy. He feels
they should leave a four foot median in the center. By doing
this they will save 13 homes which will be taken for a retention
pond. He doesn't want DOT to jam this down our throat like the
Florida Power and Light poles. He firmly believes the Council
could negotiate with the DOT and make changes. He once again
urged Council to save our City.
city Manager Hooper presented Council with an update on the
status of the widening of SR 442. The 90% plans are done.
Technically you could ask to change but in an essence they are
headed for construction in the next four months. We are at the
very last stages of the design of SR 442. Its current design has
money coming from DOT for beautification for $100,000. It has a
grant application of matching. If the City puts up money, DOT
will match up to $300,000 for further beautification. He spoke
about the sidewalk going out to 1-95. He spoke about elevation
being a problem due to the road being raised. He spoke about a
retaining wall and this not being aesthetically pleasing. He
spoke about the alternative to doing that. This is the final
part they are negotiating. They will be adding more parking
spaces to our Library. They have responded to save the fountain
by relocation. They have agreed to pay for the relocation of the
fountain. He described to Council that any changes at this date
would run the extreme risk of them saying they won't do the road
and they will take the money and go elsewhere.
Mayor Schmidt asked if they could get a copy of the 90% plans.
City Manager Hooper stated he has a copy on his desk. He stated
they could discuss it at the next Council meeting or the goal
setting session. He spoke about the numerous compromises made by
DOT.
Councilwoman Lichter asked Mayor Schmidt to bring with him Mike
Tanksley's sketches for the telephone poles and how he envisioned
beautifying the poles. She spoke about the processing of buying
homes having started. City Manager Hooper stated they have
notified owners and if someone wanted to sell for the price they
offered, he believes three of those have occurred. He spoke
about SR 442 being a difficult road to design.
Dick Jones, 1530 Sabal Palm Drive, spoke about Item 8A. He hopes
to convince the Council not to go through with this agreement
that Edgewater has presented to them. He is totally against this
and feels they need to pull back. He feels if they are going to
put an expansion on to our existing plant in the future, it would
be a a lot cheaper than building a new plant for those people
down there because they can't seem to justify the input they need
for the funds they want to spend. He would like to see this go
through another review before any commitment is made.
Mr. Blaise, 901 S Ridgewood Avenue, would like to apply for the
second $25,000 homestead exemption. City Attorney Clayton stated
the place you would apply would be with the County Property
Appraiser. Mr. Blaise stated he has already been there and the
City of Edgewater said no and he wants to know why. City
Attorney Clayton stated the City did not say no. They decided to
wait and see what the effect of the adoption in other
jurisdictions was and also wait to see what the final rules from
the Department of Revenue were going to be in order to adopt the
program or be able to consider whether to adopt the program next
year. City Manager Hooper stated it would be brought back to the
Council next year. Probably around April or May is when the
Council will see it for the following year.
Page -2-
Council Regular Meeting
December 20, 1999
-w'
..."
Dominic Capria, 606 Topside Circle, stated these people need
help. He asked if they have started checking into it and the
impact. City Manager Hooper stated they have been checking into
it but the real problem is all of the rules on how it will be
implemented have not been completed. The real issue comes down
to those that would be eligible. That is the income levels.
Mr. capria stated from what he is reading the rules are pretty
simple and it does exclude social security providing the social
security is not used on the tax base, which means a heck of a lot
to a lot of citizens.
Mr. Capria spoke about the sewer plant. He asked in the building
of this, the lines that will be put in, who is responsible to put
those lines in, the City or the County. City Manager Hooper
stated the City is responsible. Mr. Capria stated they could
have done it without the County. City Manager Hooper stated when
they get to that item he will cover in great detail the logic of
why it is good for the City and the region.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilwoman Lichter stated Dee Anderson, a resident of Florida
Shores, has approached her concerning a sign indicating where
Florida Shores Clubhouse is no longer being there. She feels
they are concerned that a lot of people don't know there is a
clubhouse there. She looked at Pelican Cove West. If there is
any way they could help Florida Shores get a new sign, she would
appreciate it. They are having another board meeting in January
and would like to know if Council can do anything for them. City
Manager Hooper stated if Council wishes, he could do some
research and bring it back to Council.
Mayor Schmidt stated he remembers when that sign was there and
there is a house on the southeast corner now.
Councilwoman Lichter asked whatever happened to the pilot company
wanting to put up a directional sign at Park Avenue and U.S. #1.
City Manager Hooper stated it was on one of their first agendas,
which he took off, but it is scheduled to come before Council
soon.
Councilwoman Lichter spoke about the gas tax money. She asked if
they have finished the deal of what every City is going to get
back. city Manager Hooper commented on the formula that
describes how this will work.
Councilwoman Lichter asked about the Florida Shores Road
Improvement Project being done in the past five years really
helping Edgewater. City Manager Hooper stated that is the one he
fought for and argued hard but we are probably the only city that
would help. Councilwoman Lichter asked if they limit where we
can spend that money or does it just go into our budget. City
Manager Hooper stated it is limited to transportation areas. The
City will start receiving payments in January.
Councilwoman Rhodes spoke about Jerry Remington, a young man in
Edgewater, that has cystic Fibrosis and he might not be here next
Christmas without a double lung transplant. She was asked to
mention it by a resident. She asked Council to keep this young
man in the back of their mind because at some point, they may
come across a way to help this young man.
Councilman Brown had nothing at this time.
Councilman Vincenzi had nothing at this time.
Page -3-
Council Regular Meeting
December 20, 1999
~
.....,
Mayor Schmidt thanked everyone that turned out for the parade.
Widening or no widening of SR 442, he thinks the parades will
continue with that being the route. He feels every year they
will get bigger and better.
PUBLIC HEARINGS. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
A. 1st Public Hearinq, Joe Martin, authorized aqent for Scott
and Jennifer Porta, is requestinq final Development Aqreement
approval for 200, 210 and 220 Dale Street
City Manager Hooper made a staff presentation. This has been to
the Planning and Zoning Board with a unanimous recommendation to
go forward. Staff recommends approval.
Mayor Schmidt asked about the $460,000 being money the city will
get back eventually as we develop out there through fees. City
Manager Hooper elaborated on how this will work and what the City
will get back.
Councilwoman Lichter stated when they put money out for roads,
sewer, etc, is there any money coming in from the people involved
to hook in. Is there some expense on their part or do we fund it
all? City Manager Hooper explained they pay connection fees and
impact fees. In this case, they are giving the city right-of-way
property. This is becoming part of economic development.
Councilwoman Lichter asked if the Economic Development Board is
involved at all. City Manager Hooper stated yes they are
involved and they are here tonight.
Councilwoman Lichter asked if they have the money and don't have
to borrow it. City Manager Hooper stated there is money in the
water and sewer funds and some in the general fund. It may take
a borrowing of some non ad valorem money over a short period of
time. We have the money in hand to do it now. When they go
through several projects they are going to look at on January
10th, by the time they are said and done he thinks in the next
year there will be some bank borrowing. Not a bond issue or long
term indebtedness but a bridge financing or some short term loans
that they may do.
Mr. Porta and Ms. Plaskett were available to answer any
questions.
Dominic Capria, 606 Topside Circle, stated a few meetings back
they spoke about the roads and sewer and he believes the figure
was $1.1 million. Now tonight he hears it is $460,000. City
Manager Hooper stated he thinks he is talking about the FIND
project and further elaborated. Mr. Capria is concerned with
Phase I and II not materializing. City Manager Hooper stated he
doesn't see how Phase I will not materialize.
Councilwoman Lichter made a motion to approve the final
Development Agreement, second by Councilwoman Rhodes. The motion
CARRIED 5-0.
B. 1st Public Hearinq, Attornev Marv Hansen, authorized aqent
for Golden Star of Central Florida, Inc., is requesting final
Development Aqreement approval for Roval Oaks Community Park, 800
W. Park Avenue
City Manager Hooper made a staff presentation.
Mary Hansen, Attorney, 420 S Nova Road, Daytona Beach, stated she
is extremely pleased to bring this document before Council. She
informed Ms. Plaskett she has been instrumental in getting what
has been a very troubled manufactured housing park up to snuff.
She is available to answer any questions as well as the project
Engineer in addition to Karen Rearden and John DaRe.
Page -4-
Council Regular Meeting
December 20, 1999
..,
...,
There were no citizen comments at this time.
Mary Hansen stated they truly appreciate the Council's timely
decision and wished everyone a good holiday.
Councilwoman Rhodes made a motion to approve the final
Development Agreement, second by Councilwoman Lichter. The
motion CARRIED 5-0.
City Manager Hooper stated he sees some folks from Oak Hill if
the Council is interested in moving the agenda around.
Mayor Schmidt stated if there are no objections from Council,
they are going to move the agenda around a little bit.
There was a five-minute recess at this time to set up tables for
the meeting with Oak Hill.
They continued the meeting with Item 8A.
A. Interlocal Water and Wastewater Aqreement - Oak Hill to
outline concerns with the Aqreement between Edqewater and the
Countv of Volusia.
City Manager Hooper explained several diagrams for Council. One
showing where Edgewater and Oak Hill boundaries could go to.
There is nothing cast in stone, this is just a target area. The
lift stations being at Edgewater Landing and Meadow Lake. The
route generally is down u.S. #1 to get to the County's wastewater
treatment system. He went over the location of where the
County's wastewater system will be. He recommended to Council
that they not expand the City's plant. It turns out that our
plant has about enough capacity to service the vacant lots in
Edgewater and not excess capacity to service what in years past
had been talked of of some of this area to the south. He spoke
about the cost to expand the City's plant as opposed to the City
getting to the County's plant. It was cheaper to build a second
plant than to expand our plant and run the lines. That got us
into negotiations with an inter local agreement with the County.
The County system is really to share with the city of Edgewater
and to provide service to the unincorporated areas between the
two cities. The agreement was approved back in October. The
county has since purchased water from the city of Edgewater.
They have paid the City of Edgewater $300,000 for that water
capacity. Hacienda Del Rio has been taken offline and now it is
using solely the City of Edgewater's water. City Manager Hooper
is using some of the money that the County paid us to offset the
cost of the extension of the force main to take the two lift
stations off line so they won't go to our treatment plant and
send them to the County's treatment plant. A lot of discussion
is that is the only way this plant becomes viable for the County.
That would help them because they would have original customers.
He further elaborated on how it will help us. He feels we are in
a good situation and this is the best for the whole area to get
central water and sewer, to do industrial development and to make
the area so it will be safer.
Councilwoman Lichter asked about the rates. She has received
calls from former residents of the County who have told her the
rates the County charges for service is more than what we charge
in Edgewater and they are concerned if they will be paying the
same rates as the rest of the City or will they pay County rates.
City Manager Hooper explained it will be the same as the City
rates. It is a cost per gallon, wholesale treatment. There will
be no change in rates for the residents of Edgewater.
Councilwoman Lichter stated she toured the area on the east side
where they are planning to put the plant. She asked why is it on
the right side where there is lower land where there might be the
potential of some type of seepage to the river instead of on the
higher land on the left.
Page -5-
Council Regular Meeting
December 20, 1999
...
....,
Mary Ann Connors, utilities Director for Volusia County,
commented on the plant location. She spoke of the distance this
particular site is from residential areas. In terms of concerns
about runoff or where the reuse where be applied or the
application process, those are all issues that have been subject
to very stringent review by permitting agencies and there is no
concern in terms of this plant's location.
Councilwoman Lichter asked if there was a comparison between the
two. Ms. Connors spoke about the site they originally looked at.
Oak Hill Mayor Jeff Bracy elaborated on items brought up by City
Manager Hooper and Marian Connors. He questioned why the
taxpayers had to pay $1.5 million to buy 750 acres of orange
grove to build a sewer plant. He turned over the meeting to Doug
Kennedy who would be asking questions.
Doug Kennedy, 175 Gary Avenue, thanked Edgewater for giving Oak
Hill the opportunity to discuss this matter. He was appointed to
a Committee with Mr. Babcock and the City Attorney to look into
resolving some of the concerns. He turned the presentation over
to Mr. Babcock and agreed to continue when Mr. Babcock was done.
Sherman Babcock, 270 Navajo Drive, Oak Hill, Chairman, Economic
Development Board, City of Oak Hill, stated when they originally
started looking at this the Economic Development Board was in
favor of this. He commented on the reasons why he changed his
mind with regard to the plant location. He spoke about the depth
of the wells in Oak Hill. He feels the cost of the plant has
been a problem all along and he doesn't see that improving.
Mr. Kennedy stated City Manager Hooper has represented to them
that this is a good deal for the City of Edgewater. He
questioned sending 51 million gallons of raw sewage to the city
limits of Oak Hill. This plant is not of the caliper that you
can treat the sewage at now. Mr. Hooper has also indicated that
this is being done because you want to reserve your capacity or
are close to your capacity. He presented Council with an
interoffice memorandum from DEP in Tallahassee which states the
city has a 2.75 meg plant. You are using 1.6. You have enough
capacity to take care of Southeast Volusia and then some. Not
only are you going to lose 51 million gallons of reclaimed water
for the City residents, you are going to pay $280 a day or
$104,000 the first year in profit back to the County with a 4
1/2% increase. The County gave you $300,000 but they are also
asking you to spend $440,000 to put a line in, which leaves you
$140,000 short and then you are going to give them $104,000 the
first year and it is going to increase by 4 1/2% for the next
twenty years. The purpose of them being here tonight is strictly
environmental. Fifty one million gallons of sewage is a lot of
sewage to concentrate in anyone area without the best available
treatment plant to treat it. The County is not building the
best. You have excess capacity and can treat it. Why even take
the chance of polluting wells. They are alarmed by all the
changes that have been made. We are here to ask the Council to
give them some time to find out what they are doing and come back
and present it. His main concern is he doesn't understand how
the City can lose a quarter of a million dollars net profit the
first year of sewer people for the intention you will get future
customers. An interlocal agreement for water was put in in 1996.
If you do nothing, you are guaranteed the southeast. They can
not build a new sewer plant or water plant because of the Indian
River Lagoon Act. If you challenge their permit and the
permitting process, you will have to go to the central sewer
system which is yours. They will have no choice. Their main
concern is the pollution issue.
Mr. Kennedy handed out a letter to Council regarding the
application that went to DEP to make Edgewater Phase I of their
thing to send treatment down to that plant being denied.
Page -6-
Council Regular Meeting
December 20, 1999
'W'
..",.,
Councilwoman Lichter asked Mr. Kennedy to explain the first
handout a little better. Who is Don Berryhill and what funds
might not go through? She didn't quite know what this was
talking about. Mr. Kennedy elaborated on Councilwoman Lichter's
concerns. He spoke about if you make changes, you are in
violation. He challenged the County to show him how this thing
is every going to be profitable. He feels there is a whole lot
more that needs to be looked into. What they are asking is if it
turns out there is a possibility of pollution, Oak Hill would
like Edgewater to exercise its option to give a three-year
notification.
City Manager Hooper elaborated on the multi-step process this has
to go through. He further spoke about the 201 Plan and the
permitting process. He spoke about the difference in the
proposed sewer plant and our sewer plant. He spoke about there
being appeal processes with regard to the permit. He doesn't
think the city or Mr. Kennedy or anybody have taken advantage of
that process. This is expensive and difficult. The questions
that are being raised tonight have been raised before and sent to
the Secretary of DOT. The plant is full permitted and has run
its appeal process. If someone wanted to appeal it, they had a
time to appeal it and could have appealed it through many state
agencies through an administrative hearing process. As far as
the business end for us, it is a great business deal for us. We
aren't paying cash out, we are trading water for sewer. Those
lines are going to open up the ability for new customers, which
is exactly what we have all been talking about with regarding to
economic development. We would all love to lower our water and
sewer rates. The only way to do that is to expand the customer
base. He feels they need to talk about the permit and questioned
why they didn't challenge the permit.
Mr. Kennedy stated they just found this deletion July 22nd. They
are taking all the scrubbers and everything else out of the
plant. We weren't aware of this. This is something they have
just sent asking for a change as of July that nobody was aware
about. Mr. Kennedy questioned City Manager's Hooper comment
regarding the whole thing being to get new customers. If you did
not do the deal with the County, would you get new customers.
City Manager Hooper stated he would not get new sewer customers.
Mr. Kennedy questioned sending 51 million gallons of sewage to
Oak Hill and paying for that each year, an increasing of over
$100,000 of your bottom line net, is profitable to Edgewater's
wastewater system. City manager Hooper stated it will be
profitable to our wastewater system. As our system builds out,
we have enough vacant lots in Edgewater and enough vacant
property that all of our capacity is going to be used to handle
that. Mr. Kennedy asked what year that is expected to be used
by. City Manager Hooper informed him that is probably a ten to
fifteen year build out. Mr. Kennedy spoke about being $250,000
in the hole the first year and questioned how many new customers
will it take to make up that bottom line profit. City Manager
Hooper stated something like 250, approximately a year and a
half. Mr. Kennedy questioned if it is better to have your own
plant. city Manager Hooper explained it is not better to have
your own plant. It is better to have a regional plant that is
going to serve and maximize its capacity. This plant is
expandable. If there is a need to, they are going to expand it.
Mr. Kennedy questioned how much capacity the County really needs
to cover its customer base for this plant. Less than 70,000
gallons. They have Hacienda and 40 homes in Lighthouse Cove that
are the only customers they plan to hook up to this plant.
Councilwoman Rhodes would like to hear the County's response.
Ms. Connor spoke about the environment. The County approached
this project from the beginning with the objective that there
would not be discharge to the Indian River Lagoon. That has been
one of the guiding principles behind this plant. She further
spoke about reuse water.
Page -7-
Council Regular Meeting
December 20, 1999
......
..."
Ms. Connor then went over the finances. There is no question
that Edgewater is important in terms of making this plant
important in terms of financial liability. She stated they had
looked at being able to eliminate some septic tanks a long the
Indian River Lagoon. She spoke of the pollution in the Indian
River Lagoon. South Waterfront Park has been identified by the
Health Department as an area they recommend highly for
elimination of septic tanks. This has been and remains one of
their objectives. The County Council chose not to pursue a
special assessment for that area. They are trying everything
they can to find money that would allow us to be able to provide
these systems without having to do a special assessment. The
system provides infrastructure in an area that will allow it to
develop. DEP is fully aware of everything they have done. She
referenced the letter provided by Mr. Kennedy which references a
significant modification of the project. What was under
consideration at that time was whether or not SRF monies could
have been used to send flows to Edgewater. DEP told them no
because it wasn't the plan brought to them, not the plan they
approved, and not the plan they would fund.
Ms. Connor referenced a letter that was addressed to Oak Hill in
January 1998 from Vivian Garfine, who is the head of the Orlando
office of DEP. These are all issues that DEP and various offices
have examined. This is a fully permitted project that has been
through the most rigorous examination both of its operational
standards and its finances. They continue to qualify for use of
our state revolving loan fund. They think this plan has brought
something to Edgewater and to the citizens in the unincorporated
areas and hopefully long term, it will bring something to Oak
Hill.
City Manager Hooper gave Council a copy of the letters Ms. Connor
was talking about. He feels all of the steps that you must go
through to permit a plant, are there. If you want to appeal the
permitting of the plant there is a process. He feels they have
negotiated a very good financial deal for us to be customers and
to continue on with that process where we are wholesale customers
that are going to buy additional capacity and sell additional
water capacity. Mr. Kennedy stated without Edgewater, this plant
wouldn't be built. You are providing that so they can handle
70,000 gallons a day. He stated Councilman Jim Ward is also in
the audience and asked him to give his opinion of what he thinks
of this deal.
Mayor Bracy stated he has listened to Ms. Connor for the last six
years and addressed some of the things she said regarding
pollution of the river, the hammock and the purchasing of the
orange grove. He asked Council what they are really doing here
and why are they building a plant to service Hacienda Del Rio,
Lighthouse Cove, and buying or diverting the City's sewer into
this new plant which they are going to divert the water out of
this plant into the hammock that is going to pollute the river in
Scottsmoor and Titusville. He asked Council to give them some
time and come back.
Mayor Bracy asked Mr. Ielfield from Hacienda Del Rio to speak
about the scrubbers and the stuff on the plant that is not going
to be there.
Councilwoman Lichter stated let's assume this is environmentally
okay and from our viewpoint the deal is good, she also has a
quirk in her head about hurting her neighbors. She asked if the
plant location will infringe in any way on economic development
of Oak Hill. Ms. Connor stated that is a County owned piece of
property now. She feels the question for economic development is
more critically back to do you have the infrastructure to support
it. If you don't, there isn't any economic development.
Page -8-
Council Regular Meeting
December 20, 1999
....,
....,
Ms. Connor went on to explain Oak Hill's growth historically has
been along u.s. #1. This plant allows u.s. #1 to develop. It
will allow residential growth in planned communities, it will
allow commercial and industrial development and will bring
opportunities that would not be there otherwise.
Councilwoman Lichter spoke about every City from Port Orange
south expanding west. It is one of our goals to try and expand
west. Might it not be one of theirs. Ms. Connor stated she
believes Oak Hill would look at expansion out May town Road. She
stated there are many factors besides ownership in this plant
that would affect its viability in terms of expansion to the
west. There is a lot of infrastructure that has to be in place
before the City can expand.
Mayor Bracy stated if the plant is built west of us, how can they
expand west. He stated there is a sawgrass pond that is on this
750 acres that is protected by the federal government. He
doesn't see how the Finance Director can justify the construction
of the plant based on the current number of customers. If they
couldn't prove that South Waterfront Park and Indian Harbor was
polluting, then why are they building this plant.
Ms. Connor spoke about different plants they have and their
locations. She went on to address finances. Where they have
built plants and put in infrastructure and made the investment,
development comes. It has never failed to happen. They have
been doing this for many years and the County is always in the
position of building plants ahead of development.
There was a brief discussion regarding exactly where the plant
will sit.
Mayor Bracy again asked if he may bring Mr. Ielfield up. He
feels the City has a class act sewer plant in the City of
Edgewater. He spoke of the plant being odor free. This plant
they are fixing to build, when we get a northwest wind, our City
is going to be covered with the odor.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked if Oak Hill's problem is with DEP or
the County. Mr. Kennedy stated there have been significant
changes within the last six months that we aren't sure if DEP is
aware of them and they have re-permitted them. That is why they
are asking for the time to reconfirm that it is still in
compliance. Ms. Connor stated DEP is fully aware of all of the
changes.
Mr. Kennedy stated it is also on the record that they must assess
Waterfront Park and Indian Harbor Estates a special assessment or
their loan is in violation. They haven't done either and in the
conversation with DEP as late as this week, they still plan to
come in and force city residents, says DEP, which they can not do
by State law. They would like to get the documents in writing
and have them all in order without the changes to what is going
on. He believes the City Clerk can attest to phone conversations
that they say one thing and DEP tells us something different.
The only thing they know is Edgewater is the largest customer and
the reason they are building this plant is to service Edgewater.
They have a letter dated December 7th where it was denied, they
are saying for the transmission line, DEP on the phone is saying
no, as a customer base.
Councilwoman Rhodes feels they have come to the wrong place. The
problem is with the County and DEP apparently. She thinks it is
unfair to ask Edgewater to step in. She feels we are being put
in the middle and Oak Hill wants us to negotiate this process.
Page -9-
Council Regular Meeting
December 20, 1999
...".
....,
Mr. Kennedy stated they are not asking the city to negotiate this
process. This process was brought before the last Council at the
11th hour and approved. It has come to light so many changes
that before you continue to go on, that you give us the
opportunity to show you there may be some problems with this
deal.
Councilwoman Lichter asked what the delay means in terms of our
project that is being requested by Mr. Kennedy.
city Manager Hooper stated Councilwoman Rhodes is absolutely on
target. This issue is with the permit. The permit was issued in
1997 and they could have appealed anytime over the past two
years. There is an appeal process to go through the whole thing
with DEP. Not the City or the County's problem. If they are
upset with the way it is permitted or think there is missing
ingredients, that is the steps. He has been through it and
doesn't think there is any missing ingredients. He feels the
plant is a good gold mine for long term development.
Councilwoman Rhodes agreed with city Manager Hooper as well as
Mr. Kennedy. She believes they want the best for our
environment. Mr. Kennedy stated 51 million gallons a year. That
is why they are asking for 60 to 90 days. He feels County
Councilman Jim Ward can shed light on this as a business deal.
Jim Ward, County Councilman, District 2, stated he didn't come
here to speak, he came to listen. He will give his opinion but
he is not here to get in the middle of this battle. He thinks it
is a bad business deal for County utilities. That has been his
argument from the beginning. It was based simply on what it
would bring in. He commented on the usage of a 600,000 per
gallon per day plant, only 104,000 gallons would be used per
month and that is pretty low. Even at build out, in fourteen
years, they will still only be using about 200,000 gallons per
day on a 600,000 gallon plant. It is no secret, the plant won't
run without Edgewater.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked Councilman Ward if he had any
environmental concerns. Councilman Ward stated they haven't
taken the first home off of a septic tank. They, as a Council,
decided not to put an assessment on Indian Harbor Estates and
South Waterfront Park.
Councilman Ward commented on this being a bad business deal for
County utilities and the County utility customers to lose money
for fourteen years.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked Councilman Ward if he felt it was a
good business deal for Edgewater. Councilman Ward stated it may
be a good deal for Edgewater. The County paid the City $300,000
up front and they won't start collecting the City's $100,000
until the plant comes on line, which will be about $10,000 per
month.
Councilman Vincenzi asked when construction is expected and when
will it be finished.
Councilman Ward stated he is not here to try and get in between
the two cities. He represents Edgewater and Oak Hill and this is
his opinion as a business person. It is a bad deal for County
utility customers. The County voted 5-2 to pass it. The deal
with Edgewater was struck after that. They didn't know at the
time that they had to have Edgewater to make it run.
Page -10-
Council Regular Meeting
December 20, 1999
'llllIJlf
...""
Mayor Schmidt asked about the customers of the county that they
aren't going to force them to hook up, have people talked to them
to get their opinion. Are there people voluntarily going to want
to go on this because they don't want the septic tank? He spoke
about when the City went on sewers. Councilman Ward explained
there were some people from Indian Harbor Estates and South
Waterfront Park that were in favor of putting it in.
Ms. Connors explained the plant is under construction and should
be completed this time next year.
Councilwoman Rhodes stated Mr. Kennedy and Mayor Bracy have asked
the City to hold off and questioned how long they want us to hold
off. Mr. Kennedy stated ideally would be 90 days. They have
some people they would like to have come to the City commission
meetings such as the health department to define which way the
flow is. They would hopefully be able to complete this in 60
days.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked City Manager Hooper if this is
possible. City Manager Hooper explained ours is a multi-step
process. We aren't going to go out and spend $400,000 tomorrow.
We are going to authorize an engineer to do an alignment study
and go out and design some pipes. We are a long way from
spending money. They can take their 90 days and question the
permit. We will not have spent any construction money by then so
it won't hurt us. He would like to consummate the deal and get
the engineers going and if they find a way to stop the permit, he
is sure we will be the first to know. He urged Council to
continue on the path with the addendum in front of them.
Councilwoman Lichter commented on us already starting by selling
water. City Manager Hooper explained the plant has started. We
have started by doing an agreement. Their argument is with the
State. Councilwoman Rhodes stated in 90 days they could still
halt if they showed us some real compelling reasons, other than
hearsay. Mr. Kennedy stated the only difference is you are going
to be $440,000 more out. City Manager Hooper stated no we won't,
we will not have paid any of that money. Mr. Kennedy stated you
won't have spent any but you will have signed an agreement and
will legally be responsible for it. It will only take four to
five months to build your lines down to that plant. City Manager
Hooper stated we will not be responsible, we will have signed an
agreement that says first there is a planning phase, there is a
design phase, there is a permitting phase. If someone comes in
and says the plant can't be built, these folks will be the first
to tell me we have a problem and they are stopping construction.
They won't continue construction. He is very confident that we
won't waste any money on a plant that isn't going to be built.
Mr. Kennedy asked City Manager Hooper if he feels confident that
he won't be violating the SRF loan in any way. city Manager
Hooper stated yes, he does feel confident with that.
Sandra Haley, 189 Charles Street, South Waterfront Park, stated
they did not oppose the sewer plant. We have 411 lots, 360
houses and over 1f3 of our population are widows. They do not
have the funding base in which to afford an assessment. The
assessment was $4,600 per household, not including hookup fees.
Councilwoman Rhodes stated if you don't have an assessment you
would prefer to be included. Ms. Haley stated they are about
divided, half and half. She spoke about an issue being the
design of the plant.
There was further discussion regarding a gravity collection
system.
Page -11-
Council Regular Meeting
December 20, 1999
IIiW'
...."
Sherman Babcock, Economic Development Board, Oak Hill, spoke
about westward expansion of Oak Hill. Councilwoman Rhodes stated
anyone could have bought that property and not done anything with
it, and you still would have had to expand around it. Mr.
Babcock commented on the reason Oak Hill has not appealed the
permit to the County. They do not have the capacity and the
engineering people to challenge that permit.
City Manager Hooper spoke about the appeal process. He suggested
if they are appealing the process to go to the State and make
that approach. The complaints are they don't want the plant or
because it is in the western boundary area. Nobody has come in
and said this plant has been poorly designed.
Mayor Schmidt asked if our Council had any more questions or
concerns. He explained they would ask our Council, the County,
and then Oak Hill.
Councilman Vincenzi asked if we have entered into any type of
legal agreement with the County. City Manager Hooper stated yes.
Councilman Vincenzi asked how much it would cost the City if we
decided to back off. city Manager Hooper explained why he thinks
it would be pretty severe. He explained what steps have been
taken so far.
Councilman Vincenzi stated a lot of their problems are with the
County or the permitting process. If they have misrepresented
themselves in the construction of the plant or the design, what
we do, will not have an affect. city Manager Hooper stated they
have started construction and issued a notice to proceed. We
have a commitment that when they have their plant open we are
going to have flow to get to it. We have to follow that process
so when it is open we are there too.
Councilwoman Lichter stated if DEP finds something wrong along
the way, environmentally, then that is when we would pull back
and stop. City Manager Hooper commented on what DEP would do.
The plant will be monitored to the same exact level our plant is
monitored.
Ms. Connors stated there are no issues before Council tonight
that are new. This plant has been planned for years. It has
been through very rigorous examination and it will continue to
be. It will always be monitored in terms of its operation
condition and the use of the reuse system. They believe the
plant is a good investment.
Mr. Kennedy stated the reason the City is involved is because
this plant was dead until the City became a customer of this
plant. It became an interdeal to save face for the County and to
save their loan.
Councilman Vincenzi doesn't understand how the City will buy Oak
Hill time. Mr. Kennedy stated if the City does not approve the
transmission line, that will give them time with DEP and others
to put the question in the mind and to get the legality worked
out. Each contract the city signs and goes with, puts them one
hurdle harder to get to to stop the process if there is something
wrong. He doesn't believe Mr. Hooper told them everything. If
they decide to get out of this, in the contract all you have to
do is give 36 months notice to the County that you will quit at
the end of 36 months.
Councilwoman Rhodes stated the previous Council made a commitment
to the County. Mr. Kennedy asked that the city make no more
commitments until they get a chance to show them their facts.
Page -12-
Council Regular Meeting
December 20, 1999
~
..",.,
Mayor Schmidt stated from the very beginning, this council is
thinking ahead in the future. We wouldn't be able to expand our
plant sitting where it is. From his point of view, he feels this
is a great deal for us.
Mr. Kennedy explained it is not that they don't want it and they
don't want to pay the money, it is they are concerned with the
environment.
City Manager Hooper explained to Council this is a state problem.
They are the only entity that has the authority to do it. They
need to address that with the permit. We have cut the best deal
we can with the County for a business venture.
Mr. Kennedy stated if the city had not become customers and they
don't need this, we wouldn't be here tonight. You have brought
yourself into this situation by becoming customers for something
you mayor may not need in fifteen years, depending on growth.
Councilman Brown stated there is no doubt somewhere fifteen years
from now, we are going to need a sewer plant in the south part of
Volusia County. Fifteen years from now, it is not going to be
cheaper to build one. If you compare the cost of rebuilding one
that we build now as compared to building the whole thing fifteen
years from now, you are still going to come out ahead. We are
going to grow. Mr. Kennedy stated you have already spent your
money for your growth. Why are you getting involved out of your
area?
Councilwoman Lichter stated she thinks Mr. Kennedy is getting
over a line a little bit when he says we got ourselves into this
situation. There is home rule, self protection and an entity of
a city called Edgewater. We have to look at it from our
viewpoint for the citizens of our community. If it proves to be
environmentally unsafe, there are points that will be pointed our
and we will be caused to halt. She trusts Mr. Hooper very much
and sees his viewpoint.
Mayor Schmidt asked if Mayor Bracy or anyone else had any
questions. Mayor Bracy thanked the Council for inviting them
tonight. He asked the City and County if the plant is supposed
to be a third rate plant, the water that is going to have e-coli
and other diseases in it that will not be taken out. If it can't
be put on the orange groves and it is going to pollute their
drinking water, who is going to be liable for their drinking
water in the City of Edgewater. This plant is a bare bones
plant. They took the scrubbers off the top of the plant that
keeps the odor down to save $200,000. They are asking for 90
days to check everything out.
Councilwoman Rhodes stated no matter what the City does, they
have 90 days. If it is going to cause contamination of a City,
she would think they could back right out of that deal and nobody
could sue us.
Mayor Bracy stated they are going to do their homework and come
back in 90 days. This plant is not quite started yet.
City Manager Hooper spoke about water quality.
Ms. Connors stated they have offered to Oak Hill, at their
expense, they would be willing to do a test of the wells in the
area. Mayor Schmidt asked if that offer is still on the table.
Ms. Connors stated it is still on the table as well as an
invitation to Oak Hill to visit the plants they have built twice
comparable to this one, which are producing reuse in public
access. They are Deltona North and Southwest Regional.
Page -13-
Council Regular Meeting
December 20, 1999
..,
w
Bob Ielfield, Hacienda Del Rio, thinks this is a sad situation
and feels the County does bare responsibility. They have treated
the folks in Oak Hill with contempt. Oak Hill didn't find out
the plant was going to be changed until they accidentally saw a
surveyor. The County didn't even have the courtesy of notifying
the city commissioners that they had changed the location of this
plant. He spoke of the problem they had with their plant having
a bad odor. He wound up filing a complaint with the DEP. They
sited the County. The County was forced to do what they should
have done months ago. Why should citizens have to go to a state
agency to get our own County people to do what they should have
done after they made telephone call after telephone call. We
shouldn't be fighting with the County, we should be working with
the County. He feels the ratepayers of Volusia County are going
to pay through the nose for this plant.
Mayor Schmidt asked when the next County Council meeting is.
Councilman Ward informed him January 6th. He thanked the County
and the City of Oak Hill. In a couple of months, if there is
enlightening information that they need, they will be more than
willing to listen to them again. We are looking at this as a
business deal and we also want to be neighborly. We are not
against the city of Oak Hill and urged them to come back with any
new information.
There was a ten-minute recess at this time.
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Animal Control Board Appointment - Councilwoman Rhodes'
appointment to the Board for a three year term to fill the
vacancy of Diane Corson, who resiqned
Councilwoman Rhodes asked that this item be removed. For
whatever reason, one of the applications was not considered by
the Board and she would like them to see all the applications
before they give her a recommendation.
city Manager Hooper agreed to bring this back at the first
meeting in February.
B. Interlocal Aqreement - requestinq approval of Interlocal
Aqreement for Distribution of Additional 5-Cent Local option Fuel
Tax, and authorizinq Mavor or city Manaqer to execute document
C. Disaster Relief Fundinq Aqreement - requestinq authorization
for Mavor or city Manaqer to execute Agreement which provides
funds for eliqible disaster relief activities
City Manager Hooper made a brief presentation on Items B & C.
Councilwoman Rhodes moved for approval of the Consent Agenda,
second by Councilwoman Lichter. The motion CARRIED 5-0.
OTHER BUSINESS
A. Interlocal Water and Wastewater Aqreement - Oak Hill to
outline concerns with the Aqreement between Edqewater and the
County of Volusia.
This item was discussed earlier on the agenda.
B. Interlocal Water and Wastewater Aqreement - staff
recommendinq approval of Amendment 1 to design, permit and
construct the sewer interconnect for an amount not to exceed
$440,577
City Manager Hooper made a staff presentation. We will not issue
a notice to proceed on construction until all the permits are in
hand. Page -14-
Council Regular Meeting
December 20, 1999
....
~
Councilwoman Lichter asked about the escape clause. City Manager
Hooper elaborated on her concerns.
Councilman Vincenzi moved for approval, second by Councilwoman
Rhodes. The motion CARRIED 5-0.
C. citizen Appeal - Kirk Lessiq, aqent for Karl's Kar Kare,
requesting city Council review the citizen Code Enforcement
Board's denial for lien appeals
City Manager Hooper made a staff presentation.
Dennis Fischer, Building Official, further commented on the case
and how they came up with the lien figure.
City Manager Hooper stated his recommendation to Council is that
they find the satisfaction of lien and give the owner 90 days to
come in compliance with the City codes as they exist today and
not charge for the part he really can't justify.
Councilwoman Lichter asked if he is in compliance now. City
Manager Hooper explained he is mostly in compliance.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked if they could forgive the lien until
they are in compliance. City Manager Hooper stated that is what
he is trying to say. Mr. Fischer explained he is in compliance
of the order that was imposed on him by the Board to construct a
spray booth, which he did in a period 72 days late of the order.
He commented on complaints they have received over the years but
most of it has been brought into compliance.
Mayor Schmidt informed Mr. Lessig he had a question.
Kirk Lessig, 3311 willow Oak Drive, Karl's Kar Kare, 2335 Guava
Drive, stated his name and address.
Mayor Schmidt spoke about why he feels this is a unique for the
City Council. He wants to hear anything that is left that needs
to be done. He asked Mr. Lessig if he felt confident that he
would be able to correct anything else that needs to be done in
90 days. Mr. Lessig stated he doesn't know of anything that they
couldn't do in 30 days. He spoke to the property owners to the
north who are currently with a real estate agent. That contract
is up in February. Even if they don't purchase the property to
the north of them, he doesn't know what their next step is as far
as being in full compliance but he doesn't see a problem with
getting there now.
Councilwoman Lichter stated she was at that Code Enforcement
Board meeting as an observer and she did feel this gentleman was
sincere in that he wanted to bring that business into compliance.
She spoke about encouraging business in Edgewater.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked about overriding Code Enforcement.
City Attorney Clayton commented on Statutory procedure.
Councilwoman Lichter spoke about when she served on the Planning
and Zoning Board and the Council overriding their decision.
Councilman Brown asked if they would still charge the $1,944 for
costs incurred by the city. City Manager Hooper stated his
recommendation is not to because he doesn't have good records
over how that came about. In lieu of that, is a motion that
would say the Mayor is authorized to execute a satisfaction of
lien upon a clean review by the Code Official to say they have
come into compliance in no more than 90 days.
Page -15-
Council Regular Meeting
December 20, 1999
......"
..,
city Attorney Clayton stated the conditions required for
compliance for which lien satisfaction is necessary in order to
accomplish. If we release the lien, those conditions have to be
fulfilled after it is released. Mr. Fischer stated you could
always start code enforcement action again even if you did
release the lien.
Councilwoman Rhodes stated she has no problem releasing this
lien. She does have a problem in the future releasing liens
without the City recovering their costs. City Manager Hooper
stated that has been addressed and we now have procedures and
policies over tracking the City's cost.
Councilwoman Rhodes made a motion to grant Karl's Kar Kare
satisfaction of lien, second by Councilman Brown. The motion
CARRIED 5-0.
OFFICER REPORTS
City Clerk Wadsworth informed Council the Fire Department has
been working on the City's website. It is up and running and the
address is cityofedgewater.com. We are going to start putting
the agendas and minutes online. She also wished everyone a Happy
Holiday.
City Attorney Clayton wished everyone a Happy Holiday.
city Manaqer
1) Distribute memorandum of qoals and priorities for upcominq
city Council work session
City Manager Hooper commented on a list of goals and priorities
he has come up with for the Council's work session on January
10th. He doesn't want to take anything away from what Council
wants to talk about but he gave this to them as food for thought.
City Manager Hooper went over a tentative agenda schedule he has
set up.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked about the responses to the ad for the
attorney.
2) Seek Council direction concerninq selection process for city
Attorney responses
City Manager Hooper informed Council two responses came in today
at 2 p.m. They can extend the advertisement, readvertise and go
out for a couple more weeks. It was the consensus of Council to
extend this.
Councilwoman Lichter asked if there is something on the agenda
schedule to form some kind of committee to talk turkey with the
Manager about salary and terms etc. She feels they should give
that some thought for their January 10th goal setting session.
city Manager Hooper agreed to put this on the agenda for January
3rd.
Mayor Schmidt stated since they have taken over, even before they
took over, the attorney has been an issue for all of them on
wanting a firm or full-time attorney. He has talked to City
Manager Hooper and listened to a lot of different people. Over
the next month or month and a half they really don't have any
real pending items. He wants to start the new year. He wants
the City to start a new year on a real positive strong note.
Page -16-
Council Regular Meeting
December 20, 1999
~
"""
Mayor Schmidt stated the City Attorney spot, he is looking for
some opinions from the Council on whether they keep a City
Attorney on staff right now or if they decide to come to a mutual
agreement where they don't need it they have some counsel in
place and they move on. He has thought about this for several
weeks. He is to the point, comfort wise, that he would like to
bring it in front of the Council to see how the people feel and
see if they want to take another step and move forward.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked exactly what do you mean by move
forward. Mayor Schmidt stated he thinks it is time they sever
ties with the City Attorney. We are well into the process now.
We have some applications and we also have help if we need it for
legal advice. City Attorney Clayton stated that is perfectly
fine with me. She wouldn't want anyone to hesitate in accepting
the suggestion of the Mayor.
Mayor Schmidt stated there have been a lot of comments,
suggestions, and name bashing and he wants to get it all done.
Ms. Clayton has served us well for the two years and also early
in the 90's when she was around. Edgewater is growing and we are
growing in a different direction than that City Attorney. He
feels within himself that it is time. He wanted to hear some
opinions.
Councilwoman Rhodes wished it would have been an agendaed item.
She would have liked to have been able to give this some thought
prior to walking in here at 10:30 at night being asked to make a
decision that she really hasn't considered. She didn't think she
needed to consider it since they were in the process of looking
for another attorney.
Councilwoman Lichter stated she thought Mayor Schmidt was going
to say something else when he started. She thought he might have
said that since they only got two applications in, that maybe we
should reconsider the thought of in-house live-in the city. Last
time, they did it both ways. She is the one that said they
shouldn't be surprised with things at 11:00 at night but her
feelings are similar to Mayor Schmidt.
Mayor Schmidt stated maybe it should have been an agendaed item.
He doesn't consider it a complete surprise because it has been on
everybody's mind.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked if any of the boards need an attorney.
City Manager Hooper stated the Code Enforcement Board is the
board that needs the assistance. There are methods to do that.
City Attorney Clayton stated you would probably not have that
need because Code Enforcement is going to meet after the 17th so
if you are going to do any advertising and interviewing you could
probably have someone on board. You have in the contract
provided for any given Monday the ability to sever those
relations and that is the way it was always presented so she is
perfectly fine to consider this to be the last meeting she
attends. You can call Donna McIntosh to come in on an interim
basis. Obviously it is an assistance in her being considered by
being familiar with the Council.
Councilman Vincenzi stated other than not being an agendaed item,
he thinks Mayor Schmidt's comments have some merit. We do have
other options open if we need legal assistance. We have a legal
staff person. City Attorney Clayton stated she is almost a
paralegal.
Councilman Brown stated he feels the same as Councilwoman Rhodes
does. He would like some time to think about it also. He
doesn't know how he would vote if they vote on this this evening.
Mayor Schmidt stated if they want to vote on it, he is looking
for a motion. Page -17-
Council Regular Meeting
December 20, 1999
w
...
Councilman Vincenzi made a motion, second by Councilwoman
Lichter. The motion CARRIED 5-0.
CITIZEN COMMENTS/CORRESPONDENCE
Mike Visconti, 316 pine Breeze Drive, wished everyone a very
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year and asked Council to keep
Edgewater in mind in the Year 2000.
Doris Hill, 112 Lincoln Road, commented on the sewer plant. This
City went through a lot of turmoil when we built that plant. As
a matter of fact, the united Taxpayers, brought suit because the
plant had such a huge capacity. It was supposed to serve us for
the next 30 years. She has been told that by the time we used
all of that capacity that it would be time to build another one
anyway because technology would have come so far that it would be
obsolete. This deal we entered into, she knows it sounds like a
sweetheart deal but it doesn't ring true to her. She doesn't
know why when we have the capacity to handle all of this why we
are turning it over to the County and what we are doing is we are
trading off our water. Our water is the commodity that we have
that we can really sell. She doesn't think this is a sweetheart
deal. She thinks it stinks. The people down there don't want a
sewer system and have been fighting it. She knows for a fact
that is the only place you can go and get shell fish. She
doesn't see where they are doing any polluting of the water.
They don't want sewers but the County wants them to have the
sewers. Here we have injected ourselves into that. She doesn't
think it is fair. She hopes it comes out alright but has her
doubts. She doesn't know what they are saving all of this
capacity for. She wished everyone a Merry Christmas.
Dominic Capria, 606 Topside Circle, wished everyone a Merry
Christmas. He intended to get up while Nikki Clayton was still
here but she is not here. They had a hearing December 2nd in
Judge wills chamber with their tax case in Edgewater Landing.
The judge ruled the city could not intervene but he did rule that
a memorandum could be submitted as long as they don't rehash the
issues. He is disappointed that nothing was brought up tonight.
The deadline for filing was the 16th. Today is the 20tn. He
asked what the situation is. city Manager Hooper stated the
brief was completed and the brief was filed. Mr. Capria asked
what is in the brief. City Manager Hooper stated he would be
glad to furnish anybody with that information. The judge
directed Nikki to file the brief by a given date. It is not a
policy issue, it is a legal issue on which to file. She has
filed that. He would be glad to give anyone a copy tomorrow.
Mr. Capria stated he would pick it up tomorrow.
City Manager Hooper asked the Council if they wanted him to do
something about the issue of an attorney in the way of a
temporary. He stated there are several. Donna is available to
us on an as needed basis. That does not bother him and she has
been there whenever we have asked. There are other attorneys
that would be able to answer any questions of himself or staff.
He is comfortable for a period of time if Council is comfortable
for a period of time on using Donna. If we need Donna to be here
some night, we will. Otherwise the agreements will continue and
will be reviewed by Robin and himself. If he is unsure about
something, he will send them to Donna McIntosh unless Council
wants him to do something different. It was the consensus of
Council for City Manager Hooper to contact Donna McIntosh on an
as needed basis.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to discuss councilwoman Lichter
moved to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 10:50 p.m.
Minutes submitted by
Lisa Bloomer
Page -18-
Council Regular Meeting
December 20, 1999