01-13-2004 - Coral Trace SubdivisionSD -0305 Coral Trace Subdivision
Preliminary Plat— l s ` Review
TRC Meeting Minutes
January 13, 2004
INN ATTENDANCE:
Darren Lear, Chief Planner
Terry Wadsworth, Environmental Services Dir.
Elizabeth Kennedy, Forte MaCaulay
Max Bosso, Forte MaCaulay
Sue Harpster- McCoy, Harpster Eng.
Lynn McCoy, Harpster Eng.
Pat Drosten, Planning Tech
Brenda Johnson, Environmental Services Deputy Dir.
Robin Matusick, Paralegal
Katie Gierok, Gierok Eng.
Ira Battle, Gierok Eng.
Ken Hooper, City Manager
Plannine Department
System and System Design Information
1. Site Plan approval must be granted prior to clearing the commercial portion.
Separate Commercial Site Plan will be submitted. Details to be worked out with Dale.
2. Please provide landscaping plan (with irrigation plan) for common areas.
In progress.
3. Per Development Agreement entrance road shall be 100 -feet in width, plans show 80 -feet.
OK.
4. Per Development Agreement sidewalks shall be five (5) feet in width, please correct plans, also Developer
may want to consider extending sidewalks to the entrance of the commercial property.
Will be a part of the Commercial SP.
5. Subdivision design should match "Master Plan" of the Development Agreement.
OK.
6. Per Section 21 -51.02 of the Land Development Code streetlights are to be located at 300 - 400 -foot intervals.
OK.
7. Provide Traffic Impact Analysis (0.5 mile radius).
Was previously submitted.
8. Provide right decel land on westbound S.R. 442.
Shown on plans, will provide detail.
9. Provide detail and location of traffic calming devices.
Will add two (2) additional.
10. Provide details on entrance gate.
Will show — will provide detail.
11. Please remove median cuts along entrance roadway.
This has been redesigned — Will submit revision.
12. Please show any proposed fencing, walls, if applicable.
Will submit with Landscape Plan.
13. Provide total number of specimen trees on site, to address Minimum Tree Protection Standards.
Will submit with Landscape Plan. Tree count will be submitted.
SD -0305 first review - cORAL TRACE sub
Created on 1/14/2004 11:45:00 AMCreated by bwenzel
14. Environmental Assessment Report — Introduction addresses property located in Brevard County, please
correct.
Will correct.
15. Please provide sign details (must be consistent with proposed S.R. 442 Overlay Zone).
Entrance signs OK. (City will provide Forte MaCaulay with copy of SR 442 Overlay Zone).
16. Scale on Preliminary Plat should be no less than V = 50'.
OK as is.
17. Provide lot dimensions and setbacks on Preliminary Plat.
Dennis would prefer setback lines on plat, however all lots have same setbacks which is listed in General Notes. Ok
as is.
18. Will tract F be included in the subdivision?
Yes.
19. Applicant should obtain a copy of the City of Edgewater Standard Construction Details?
Has — (the CD is incorrect in some areas.)
20. Permits required or letter of exemption from appropriate agency:
a. St. Johns River Water Management District
OK
b. Florida Department of Transportation
OK
c. Volusia County
N/A
d. Army Corps of Engineers
OK
OK
e. Department of Health
f. Florida Fish and Wildlife
OK
g. Department of Environmental Protection
OK
Bellsouth - John Bovee
BELLSOUTH does not have facilities in the area to serve the subdivision.
We will require a 30'X30' easement within the subdivision for future BELLSOUTH equipment. The equipment
BELLSOUTH will place will provide the required service requirements.
Please have the developer contact me in the above regard.
Phone: 386 - 252 -0818
Cell: 386 - 290 -9251
Fax: 386- 252 -7121
E -Mail: John.Bovee @Bellsouth.com
Addr: 900 N Nova Rd
Daytona Beach, Fl 32117
Will provide.
Legal Department
Based on review of the plans submitted, the Legal Department has no objection as long as the Developer complies
with the following:
1. Developer shall comply with all Federal, State and City requirements, including the Code of Ordinances
and Land Development Code;
OK.
2. Plan items /drawings must be incorporated into the Development Agreement (phases of development, etc)
and must be as described in the Agreement; and
OK.
SD -0305 first review - cORAL TRACE sub
Created on 1/14/2004 11:45:00 AMCreated by bwenzel
All documents should be forwarded to the City Attorney. (Note: All documents sent to City Attorney
via Fed Ex on December 31, 2003.)
OK.
Building Department
All setbacks must be clearly located on the plat map. Any other exemptions granted under development agreement
must also be on the plat map. This will allow the surveyor to relay the information to the site that is being surveyed
helping the accuracy of permitting.
See Planning note #17.
Environmental Services
Sheet #2
1. No air release valve on force main.
Will provide note.
2. No water service for lots 98 & 99.
Service is shown.
3. Would like to see 8" water main stub to the east across the main intersection of 442 for future
development and to tie into Mission Road, a fire hydrant would be preferable.
Max & Terry are working on this issue.
4. Would like to see 6" force main stub to the west of the main intersection of 442 for future
development.
Will provide extension.
5. 8" water main stub for commercial property, if left for a period of time could create bad water quality,
possible blow off.
OK.
6. Manhole 22 — Manhole 23 showing 8" PVC sewer where it should be 10 ".
Typo — will correct.
7. We are looking at going to radio read meters so installation of water services might change.
Advisory — OK (Robin will check with City Attorney re: agreement.)
8. Do not want sewer laterals falling into the driveways of homes or water services.
Shared laterals A will show.
9. Water service for lift station.
Shown on Sheet 18, will show on sheet 6. Chain link fence — no grass — all gravel 4 ")
10. Landscaping plantings should be designed to avoid conflict (i.e.) necessity of removal to access water
and sewer utility infrastructure.
OK.
Sheet #6
1. No air release on force main.
OK.
2. No fire hydrant.
Will show on Commercial SP and 442 overlay plans.
Sheet #9
1. Need some kind of blow off in loop between lot 159 & 160.
Disregard.
Sheet # 14 — Details
1. Need directional arrows on cleanout.
OK.
Sheet # 18 — plan view notes
1. Should be 316 stainless steel.
Will add on Note #7.
SD -0305 first review - cORAL TRACE sub
Created on 1/14/2004 1 1:45:00 AMCreated by bwenzel
2. Who are we specifying for Pump manufacturer? I think we should write this generically and not
OK. specify a manufacturer. The choice is still ours. Needs to be ABS, Flight or City approved.
OK.
M
Regular chain link is ok.
Lightning a@Fater- arrestor should be in panel.
5. Surge protection is ok on disconnect.
OK.
Design & Construction Notes
1. #21 pump cords should have their own conduit.
OK —In General Notes
2. Roadway detail should reflect standards in Land Development Code, Article V, 21 -52.05 rather than
City Standard Details.
OK.
OK.
3. Delete AVK from fire hydrant detail.
4. Sheet # 17 — add 424 -2460 to note #I for potable water design.
OK.
5. Coincide the intersection of 442 & Coral Trace Blvd. with Western Reserve Construction Plans.
Clarified — Utilities - OK.
6. Stormwater easements in backyard?
Addressed in D.A. — will be privately maintained stormwater system.
7. Outfall to "existing ditch" from lake #2. Who has responsibility or are there easements for this ditch to
be used and what will be the downstream repercussions?
Will address. Staff will provide PrelPost date to Harpster Eng. Also check ouy'all easement.
Fire Department
The plans and supporting documents for the above referenced project (received by this office on December 11,
2003) have been reviewed and the following comments are offered:
Is the entrance a private drive or public street? No hydrants are shown outside of the gate.
Will show on Commercial SP.
1. Details regarding the locking mechanism of the gate must be provided. A system ensuring emergency
ingress must be provided.
Will revise
2. I would like to discuss the installation of street mounted fire hydrant markers with the developer. This
can be done during the TRC meeting or he /she may contact me at the office.
Will contact.
Police Department
No comments at this time.
Leisure Services Department
Sheet 16 — Roadway and Parking Area Design & Construction Notes.
(37) The City does not install signage in a new development. The Developer is responsible for hiring and
paying of sub - contractor to install all traffic control devices. See No. 36 for standards to be used.
Will revise.
(38) The Developer is responsible for installation, maintenance and monthly fees for all street lights, prior to
and after acceptance of project, until H.O.A. takes over maintenance requirements.
Will revise.
SD -0305 first review - cORAL TRACE sub
Created on 1/14/2004 11:45:00 AMCreated by bwenzel
Engineering Review (Gierok Engineering)
The Preliminary Plat and Development Plan (signed & dated 12/11/03) and support materials for the
above - referenced project has been reviewed for accuracy and conformance with the City of Edgewater's
Land Development Code (LDC), PUD Agreement, and "Standard Construction Details" (SCD). The
following comments /inquiries are offered related to an engineering review:
GENERAL
1. It is noted that a landscape plan consistent with the requirements set forth in the PUD Agreement, the
SCD, and the LDC will be submitted under separate cover. Please note that a tree survey should also
be submitted that depicts and identifies all trees 12- inches (DBH) or greater, trees proposed to be
removed, and the location of any historic or specimen trees. For the Final Development Plan, a
landscaping and tree protection plan, including landscaping and irrigation plans for all common areas,
specimen tree locations and protective measures and a Street Tree Plan shall be submitted.
Discussed.
2. It was stated in the document titled "System & System Design Information" that a SJRWMD ERP
and FDOT Drainage and Driveway Connection permits, already obtained, were the only permitting
remaining except for approval by the City of Edgewater. In addition to the above - mentioned permits,
the following permits should also be acquired prior to approval.
a. Apparently, the SJRWMD permit provided is for the "Edgewater Borrow Pit ", which consists of
two (2) borrow pits, a stabilized haul road, and swales. Please note that final District approval,
in reference to the current site plan, shall be granted prior to issuance of a development order or
any construction permits;
Discussed.
b. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit (NPDES) issued by the Department of
Environmental Protection (DEP). The developer shall provide copies of the Notice of Intent and
all attachments to the Planning Department as part of the site review process;
Will submit.
C. Drinking Water Permit issued by the Volusia County Health Department; and
Will submit.
d. FDEP Wastewater Permit to construct a domestic wastewater collection /transmission system.
Will submit.
3. It is not clear if the proposed 5 -ft and 10 -ft wide drainage and maintenance easements shown along
the rear of some lots are in conformance with the PUD Agreement. No provisions for a rear yard
easement are stated, and in general we do not recommend such a design to the City. To be verified
with the City.
OK'ed by City
ROADWAY
1. Per the PUD Agreement, sidewalks are required to be constructed on both sides of roadways in the
right -of -way and shall be a minimum width of five (5) feet. The plans /calculations should be
reviewed for the following deviations:
a. The typical detail for the 50/60 -ft. R/W section specifies four (4) foot wide sidewalks.
Will revise.
b. There are no sidewalks shown along the entrance access road.
Will be addressed in Commercial SP.
C. Please note that the difference in area between the four (4) and five (5) foot wide sidewalk
dimension should be considered in the drainage calculations.
OK as is.
SD -0305 first review - cORAL TRACE sub
Created on 1/14/2004 11:45:00 AMCreated by bwenzel
2. Per the LDC, a traffic analysis is required for any new development project that may produce 500 or
more new average daily trips and /or any subdivision with greater than 25 lots. The analysis shall
provide turning movements, trip distribution and provide concurrency information.
Submitted to City. (Staff will forward copy to G erok Eng.)
3. The PUD Agreement specifies a minimum R/W width of 100 -ft for the entrance access (Coral Trace
Blvd.; Sta 9 +00 to Sta 18 +60 ±). Please revise plan sheet(s) and construction detail to show a 100 -ft
R/W section with four (4) lanes and a median per the PUD Agreement.
Will revise.
4. There is a discrepancy between the roadway pavement section specified in the LDC (1 -1/4- inches
Type S -I asphalt over an 8 -inch soil cement or 8 -inch limerock base over an 8 -inch compacted sub-
base) versus the pavement section specified in the SCD (50/60 -ft R/W: 1 -1/4- inches Type S -III
asphalt over a 6 -inch soil cement or 6 -inch limerock base over a 6 -inch compacted sub -base over a
12 -inch compacted sub - grade; 100 -ft R/W (4 -lane w/ median): 1 -1/2- inches Type S -III asphalt over
an 8 -inch soil cement or 6 -inch limerock base over a 6 -inch compacted sub -base. The plan refer to
the SCD. We recommend the design described in the LDC as has been required on other previous site
plans.
Discussed.
5. From interpretation, the PUD Agreement states that a turn lane shall be required to the "S.R. #442
frontage parcel" from the gated entrance to the commercial entrance. No left -turn lane is shown on
the plans. Please verify.
Revision will be shown on resubmittal.
6. The PUD Agreement states, "A left turn lane shall be required on S.R. #442 at the access road. A
proposed left -turn lane could not be verified on the plans. Is there an existing left -turn lane on S.R.
#442 at the access road? Please verify.
Addressed.
7. Per the PUD Agreement, please indicate where traffic- calming devices (two) are proposed within the
subdivision.
Addressed.
DRAINAGE
Plans
I. Please indicate the 25- year /24 -hour and 100 - year /24 -hour design high water (DHW) elevations for
each of the stormwater ponds on the plans. Note that the 100 -year 24 -hour DHW is required to be
below the respective top of bank for each pond.
Will respond that it won't adversely affect design.
2. Per the SCD, wet ponds should be laid out so that there is a minimum distance of 15 -ft from the top of
bank to an adjacent property line and /or easement line and a minimum of 5 -ft from the top of bank to
the right -of -way line. These dimensions could not be verified on the submitted plans. Please review
the plans for conformance.
OK.
3. Please indicate /label the limits of the wetland preservation area and the buffer dimensions on the
plans.
OK. Will add.
4. Is the 24 -inch diameter culvert at station 9 +67 on Coral Trace Boulevard permitted as part of the
FDOT Drainage Connection Permit? If no, please provide sizing calculations.
Part of FDOT requirement.
5. Preventive erosion control measures should be taken at the point of discharge from the proposed
system to the offsite receiving water.
Max will provide proposed sketch for Eng. Review.
6. Please add a typical pond section to the plans with a table that indicates the pond bottom elevation,
the grade break elevation, the control elevation, the top of bank elevation, and any other pertinent
dimensions and /or specifications. A typical section is available in the City's SCD document.
OK — See #5 above.
SD -0305 first review - cORAL TRACE sub
Created on 1/14/2004 11:45:00 AMCreated by bwenzel
Drainage Calculations
1. Please provide pre- development flood routings and a pre - development basin map depicting
existing/historical onsite drainage patterns for verification of the proportionate area and flow rate
currently discharging directly to the contiguous surface water(s) and wetlands. The following
concerns are noted:
a. It appears that in the site's existing condition, a substantial amount of stormwater runoff is
discharging (via sheet flow) to the onsite wetlands; primarily the northeast and southeast
wetlands. Furthermore, it appears that the northwest wetland overflows to the northeast wetland
via an existing drainage ditch hydraulically connecting the two and/or by overland flow. The
proposed design apparently severs the hydraulic connection between the two wetlands, causing
the northwest wetland, which is an average of approximately two (2) to three (3) feet higher in
elevation than the northeast wetland, to be land - locked. Redirecting stormwater discharge from
the wetlands in the post - development condition may significantly affect the wetland hydro -
periods and possibly degrade the condition of the wetlands.
Sue will provide Letter. (City will provide Gierok Eng, Will Pre /Post development Data.)
b. Current site drainage patterns tend to indicate that stormwater runoff is initially routed through
the onsite wetlands before ultimately discharging to the outfall ditch proposed to receive
discharge from the proposed system. The proposed design would bypass and short- circuit the
hydrologic/hydraulic function of the existing system and possibly cause upstream/downstream
flooding.
See above comment.
In summary, terminating the hydraulic connection between the two wetlands and short- circuiting the
existing hydrologic and hydraulic drainage patterns theoretically creates significant problems.
Negative impacts to the wetland hydro- periods could result from deprivation of hydration to the
downstream wetland(s) and extensive inundation of the upstream wetland. Also, upstream flooding
may occur as a result of raising the site to retain water in the upstream wetland as well as downstream
flooding depending on the deviation in the time of peak discharge for the pre- and post - development
conditions. Please consider modifying the proposed system to more closely mimic existing drainage
p atterns. For example, discharge could be directly to the wetlands after adequate pollution abatement,
specifically the northeast and southeast wetlands, instead of directly to the drainage ditch and a
hydraulic connection made between the northwest and northeast wetlands either through the proposed
system or routed around the site.
2. Apparently, a runoff curve number (CN) of `95' is being used in calculations for impervious surfaces.
The LDC specifies using the latest revision of the USDA -SCS Technical Review No. 55 (TR -55 -
"Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds ") for stormwater design. As such, the latest known edition
of the TR -55 (June 1986), indicates an impervious area CN of `98' for all hydrologic soil groups.
Furthermore, the normal pool area (surface water), is totally impervious, thus having a CN of '100'.
However, the District has previously accepted a CN of `98' for all impervious surfaces. Please
provide justification for using a less restrictive CN for impervious surfaces; otherwise, a CN of `98'
should be used.
Will respond.
3. Is the pipe from Node "ET' to Node "99E1" an existing or proposed culvert connection? Connection
not identified on plans. Please clarify.
Shows on survey, will reference on Plat.
4. Per the City's "Storm Drainage Design and Construction Notes ", "All storm drainage pipes located in
roadway R/W and roadway easements shall, ....., be designed for a minimum of a twenty -five (25)
year storm ... ". The storm sewer sizing calculations provided are based on a 10 -year storm design
with a 25 -year tailwater. Please provide justification for using a less restrictive storm design.
Sue will provide clarification.
SD -0305 first review - cORAL TRACE sub
Created on 1/14/2004 11:45:00 AMCreated by bwenzel
5. Please clarify which surface water /wetland has a 100 -year flood elevation of 9.2 -feet (Ref.: PUD
Agreement). There are a few surface waters /wetlands onsite or contiguous to the site that varies in
ground elevation. The following concerns are noted:
a. There appears to be existing floodplain storage available onsite, within the residential and
commercial areas proposed for development, below the 100 -year floodplain elevation of 9.2 -ft.
Floodplain compensating storage shall be provided for those topographical areas proposed to be
filled, which are below the elevation of 9.2 -ft.
Will address.
b. The 25 -year and 100 -year peak stages for the northwest wetland and adjacent drainage basins
are considerably high in reference to the proposed site elevations. The finished floor elevation
of home sites within or hydraulically linked to those basins should be a minimum of one (1) foot
above the 100 -year peak flood stages.
Will respond.
6. Please provide a copy of any comments /questions in reference to the current site plan that are issued
by SJRWMD upon receipt.
OK.
WASTEWATER
1. The Design and Construction Notes state that gravity sanitary sewer mains shall be installed,
whenever possible, under paved areas. Manholes #1 and #2 appear to be extended to accept flow
from the future commercial development. It seems feasible to place the structures at the intersection
of the proposed pavement turnout so that future extension would be within the paved roadway.
Entranceway will be redesigned. Will be addressed on Commercial SP.
2. An 8 -inch gravity sewer main is specified downstream of a 10 -inch gravity sewer main at Manhole
#22. Please clarify.
TYPO — will correct.
3. The specified orientation in reference to invert elevation callouts at manholes on sheet #11 profile
view does not appear to be in accordance with the north arrow shown on the plan view. Please verify.
Will revise.
4. A construction detail for the sanitary drop manhole structure(s) could not be verified on the plans. A
detail should be provided in accordance with the City of Edgewater's SCD.
Will show.
5. A note should be added to the plans, under "Sanitary Sewer Design and Construction Notes ", stating
that valves shall be spaced at a maximum of 2,000 -ft along all sanitary force mains.
Will address.
6. The proposed lift station site plan detail (sheet #18) does not agree with the layout shown in plan view
(sheet #6). For clarity, the standard layout detail should be made to concur with the plans.
Will revise.
7. Please submit pump- sizing calculations for review.
Quentin Hampton is designing.'
8. Please submit flotation calculations used to size the base of the wet well. It is recommended that
flotation calculations be performed for all manholes greater than 15 -ft deep due to the relatively high
water table condition.
Will show.
9. Per the "Sanitary Sewer Design and Construction Notes ", the proposed force main and water main
layouts should be dimensioned from the back of curb or edge of pavement.
Will show.
POTABLE WATER
1. Consistent with other instances, water service laterals to lots #53 and #54 should be constructed as
two (2) single service laterals to avoid conflict with the proposed fire hydrant assembly.
City prefers single service (within 5-feet).
SD -0305 first review - cORAL TRACE sub 8
Created on 1/14/2004 11:45:00 AMCreated by bwenzel
2. Per the PUD Agreement, connection to the City's water distribution system shall be with a minimum
12 -inch PVC water main along S.R. #442 at the main entrance road to the subdivision. The plans
indicate an 8 -inch PVC water main along S.R. #442. The plans should be revised as necessary to
conform to the PUD Agreement.
OK.
MISCELLANEOUS
For your information, in the introduction of the "Environmental Assessment Summary Report" by
BRA, the location is erroneously described as being at "the intersection of Eber Rd. and Hollywood
Blvd. In Brevard County, Florida ".
Will correct.
2. It appears that BRA has completed only a cursory review of the site. Do they have recommended
actions regarding the existence of T & E species on site? Table I indicates that habitat exists for
® manZ T & E specs. Please address.
3. A couple of t�he�construction details are mislabeled on the detail sheet(s) (i.e. Sht. 13: Silt Fence
Turbidity Barrier, Tree Protection Barricade; Sht. 14: Locator Tape).
Addressed.
4. In general, text callouts and leader arrows should be checked for accuracy (i.e. Sht. 10: In front of lot
#64, water service identified as sanitary).
OK.
For your information, the City's Public Utilities Department telephone number is: 386- 424 -2476
(Note #1; "Potable Water Design and Construction Notes ")
OK.
END OF COMMENTS.
Please note that plans are reviewed for general content and conformance with the City of Edgewater 's
Land Development Code and Construction Standards. This review is not intended to replace the design
engineers Quality Control (QC) or Quality Assurance (QA) procedures.
- Gierok Engineering
The following comments were provides for informational purposes regarding City Surveyors Plat
comments:
City Surveyor (Honevcutt & Associates)
SUBDIVISION: Coral Trace C — COMPLIANCE
SURVEYOR: William Mott Land Surveying, Inc. NC — NON COMPLIANCE
DATE: December 29, 2003 NA — NOT APPLICABLE
UTD — UNABLE TO DETERMINE
FINAL PLAT REVIEW / COMMENTS
Chapter 177 Florida Statutes Effective July 1, 1999
177.041(1) NC Submit Boundary Survey
The easement should be part of boundary survey not a separate legal. The boundary survey is
what is being platted and should be exactly the same as plat.
177.041(2) NC A title opinion showing that record title to the land as described and shown on the plat is in the name
of the person, persons, corporation, or entity executing the dedication. (Legal description in plat
must be identical to that in the Title Opinion).
SD -0305 first review - cORAL TRACE sub
Created on 1/14/2004 11:45:00 AMCreated by bwenzel
Please submit proper Title Opinion so that the review may be completed.
177.051 C 1. The primary name of the subdivision is not similar or the same as another recorded plat in the
County.
a. If a phase development words such as "the ", "replat ", "or ", and "a" are not the first word
of the primary name title.
b. If replat is part of the primary name all text is the same size and style text.
C. The primary name of the plat in the dedication is exactly as it appears in the title.
2. If the plat is a replat it is labeled as such.
177.061 NC The Surveyor's Qualification Statement should be signed and sealed. The surveyor and mapper must
state that the plat was prepared under his or her supervisor and that the plat complies with all the
survey requirements of Chapter 177, Florida Statutes. The printed name, LB or LS number and
address of the professional surveyor and mapper must be directly below the statement.
Signature and seal not applicable at this time.
177.071 C The boundary of the plat is located wholly in the City of Edgewater, Florida.
177.081(1) NC Language for evidence of review by Professional Surveyor and Mapper for the City of Edgewater,
Florida.
Please provide as shown below:
Certificate of City Surveyor
I HEREBY CERTIFY, That I have reviewed the
foregoing plat and find that it is in conformity with
Chapter 177, Part 1 Florida Statutes.
Acting City of Edgewater, Florida Surveyor
D. Wayne Wright
Honeycutt & Associates, Inc
5195 South Washington Avenue
Titusville, Florida 32780
L.B. 5289
Please revise city surveryor statement as shown above.
177.081(2) NC Dedication by owners of record complete and executed.
Execution not applicable at this time.
177.081(3) C All streets, alleys, easements, rights -of -ways and public areas clearly noted as dedicated or private.
177.091(1) NC Permanent black ink on a stable base film of .003 inches thick or a non - adhered scaled print on
a stable box film made by photographic processes.
Not applicable at this time.
177.091(2) NC A margin of at least 1 /2 inch on each of the three sides and a 3 inch margin on the left side for binding
purposes.
Not applicable at this time.
SD -0305 first review - cORAL TRACE sub 10
Created on 1/14/2004 11:45:00 AMCreated by bwenzel
177.091(3) NC a. When more than one sheet is used an index or key map must be used.
b. Each sheet has the number of the sheets and the total number of sheets included.
c. Clearly labeled match lines show where other sheets match or adjoin.
Please check all match lines and page outlines for interference with plat information. Match
line on sheet 4 of 7 is blocking out information on the curve table.
177.091(4) C a. The letter size and scale is sufficient to show all detail.
b. The scale stated and graphically drawn on each sheet.
177.091(5) C a. The name of the plat is in bold letters.
b. The name of the plat is shown on each sheet.
c. The name, street and address of the surveyor are shown on each sheet.
177.091(6) C a. The North arrow is prominent and on each sheet submitted.
b. The basis for bearings is clearly stated and referenced to a well established and monumented
line
177.091(7) NC a. Permanent reference monuments placed at each change in direction no further than 1400 feet
apart.
b. Witnesses set and noted if plat corners are inaccessible.
c. Permanent reference monuments show LS or LB numbers or unnumbered.
d. Permanent reference monuments shown by appropriate symbol or designation.
We assume that the oven souare is a permanent reference monument. Please include a legend of the
symbols you are using. See 177.091(29).
177.091(8) NC a. Permanent control points placed at intersection of centerlines of right -of -way, at the intersection
and terminus of all streets, and at each change of direction.
b. Permanent control points are no more than 1000 feet apart.
c. Permanent control points are shown by appropriate symbols or designations on the plat.
We assume that the solid circle is a permanent control point. Please include a legend of the symbols
that you are using. See 177.091(29).
177.091(9) NC All lot corners and intersections of all lines within the plat must be monumented except when
monument can not be set due to physical obstruction.
We assume that this will be done.
177.091(10) C The Section, Township and Range together with the name of the City, County and State is shown
immediately under the name of the plat.
177.091(11) C The legal description should be so complete that from it the starting point and the boundary can be
determined without reference to the plat.
177.091(12) NC Dedications and approvals as required by 177.071 and 177.081.
Not applicable at this time.
177.091(13) C Clerk of the Court and Surveyors certificate shown as required by 177.061.
SD -0305 first review - cORAL TRACE sub 11
Created on 1/14/2004 11:45:00 AMCreated by bwenzel
177.091(14) C a. The section and quarter section lines are indicated by lines, words and figures when occurring
within the plat.
b. The Point of Commencement, the Point of Beginning and all information called for is clearly
indicated.
177.091(15) C The location, width, centerline and names of all streets, waterways or other rights -of -way are shown.
177.091(16) NC a. The location and width of all proposed and existing easements as identified in the title opinion
shown on the plat in notes or legend and the intended use.
Title opinion has not been received.
b. All easements not coincident with the boundary are labeled with bearings and distances and tied
to the boundary.
Geometry of easements not clearly defined in numerous areas on plat, check all easements and
label accordingly. In particular, but not limited to, drainage access easements on rear lot lines
around perimeter Tract C and D.
177.091(17) C a. All contiguous property is identified by subdivision title, plat book and page, or if unplatted,
labeled as such.
b. If the plat is a replat, there are sufficient ties to controlling lines to permit on overlay of the
previous plat.
c. The fact that the plat is replat is stated in the subtitle including recording information and
appears below the title on each sheet.
177.091(18) C All of the lots numbered progressively or if in blocks numbered progressively and the blocks
progressively numbered or lettered, if phase development consecutively numbered throughout
additions.
177.091(19) C a. There is sufficient survey data shown to positively describe the bounds of all lots, blocks, tracts,
streets, easements and all other areas shown on the plat.
b. All irregular boundary lines have a witness line with complete data.
c. All lines are drawn to the irregular line with as much certainty as possible.
d. All dimensions except irregular lines are shown to the one hundredth of a foot.
177.091(20) C a. Curvilinear lot lines show radii, arc distances, and central angles.
b. Radial lines are designated.
c. All non - radial lines show direction.
177.091(21) C Sufficient angles, bearings, or azimuth to show direction of all lines shall be shown, and all bearings,
angles, or azimuth shall be shown to the nearest second of arc.
177.091(22) C a. All non - curved street centerlines have distances with bearing or angles.
b. All curved street centerlines have arc distances, central angles, radii, together with chord and
chord bearing.
177.091(23) C Park and recreation parcels designated as such.
177.091(24) NA All out parcels are excluded in the legal description and clearly labeled "Not a part of this plat'.
177.091(25) NC All dedicated parcels are clearly indicated or stated.
SD -0305 first review - cORAL TRACE sub 12
Created on 1/14/2004 11:45:00 AMCreated by bwenzel
177.091(26) C If tabular forms are used they occur on the sheet to which they apply.
177.091(27) C "Notice Statement" with language exactly as shown in FS 177.
177.091(28) NC Note stating that cable television may use platted utility easements and that cable television services
adhere to conditions set forth in Chapter 177.091 (28) Florida Statutes with language exactly as
shown in FS 177.019(28).
Notice statement should be verbatim. Add" construction, installation, maintenance, and operation
of cable television " to Note 4.
177.091(29) NC A legend of all symbols and abbreviations shall be shown.
Please provide a legend of all symbols and abbreviations used.
Please contact: Honeycutt & Associates, Inc., 5195 South Washington Ave., Titusville, FL 32780
(321) 267 -6233 fax (321) 269 -7847 when P.R.M.'S, P.C.P.'s and lot corners are all in place and clearly flagged for
inspection.
Additional Comments:
1. For clarity we suggest that you make the boundary line of the plat thicker and /or darker.
2. Please clean up lines through lettering particularly where they go through bearing and distances on
easements.
3. Note 1 — "does" is misspelled.
4. Note 5 — it is apparent the 10' access easements are centered on the lot lines but not expressly defined as
such in the geometry of the plat or in the note. Please clearly define this either by note or dimension on plat.
5. Note 6 is apparently an anticipation of a simultaneous recording of the plat and said deed to Tract A. Care
must be taken at the time of recording to fill in the blanks on the plat after official records book and page
are obtained.
6. Note 2 does not define any easements as either "public" or "private ". The dedication clearly states only the
easements described as "public" being dedicated to said public. Easements intended for the installation and
maintenance of public utilities need to be labeled as public utility easements.
7. Please label Tract H on sheet 5.
(Please note: Title Search was faxed to Honeycutt on December 31, 2003)
These comments are intended to comply with City of Edgewater Land Development regulations, FDOT
standard specifications and sound engineering practices, and are not meant to be inclusive of all errors or
omissions. The engineer of record is solely responsible for technical accuracy, engineering judgment, and
quality of work.
While every effort is made to assure that projects reviewed by this office comply with all applicable codes and
standards, we do not certify or guarantee that they do. It is the responsibility of the applicant to assure
compliance with all applicable codes and standards prior to the project being issued a certificate of
occupancy.
SD -0305 first review - cORAL TRACE sub 13
Created on 1/14/2004 11:45:00 AMCreated by bwenzel