12-12-2006 - Edgewater PointeSP 0615 — Edgewater Pointe
Technical Review Committee Minutes
December 12, 2006
IN ATTENDANCE:
Darren Lear, Dev. Svs. Dir.
Terry Wadsworth, En. Svs Dir
Brenda Dewees, Dep. Dir. En. Svs
Dennis Fischer, Building Official
Jill Danigel, Fire Marshal
Pat Drosten, Planning Tech
Danny Johns, P.E.
Only discussed items noted — This item is scheduled for Feb. 14, 2007
Planning Department
All sections referenced are from the City of Edgewater, Land Development Code.
General
1. Due to size of the project and variance(s) required, this project will require site
plan approval by both the Planning and Zoning Board and the City Council.
No comments
2. Provide profile indicating building height as measured from the crown of the
road.
No comments
3. Survey indicates parcel 2A and 2B yet title work indicates parcels 1,2A, 2B and 3.
Please clarify.
No comments
4. Plan indicates scale is 1 '= 40' but the plan scales out at 1 '= 30'. Revise
accordingly.
No comments
5. A variance from Section 21 -52.02 (c) regarding the 660' distance required
between the access points on US 1 to the intersection of Oak Branch Drive.
Variance application given to Danny.
6. Left and right turn lanes are required in accordance with Section 21 -52.05 (g).
Danny and Darren will speak with DOT — may request variance for this item.
7. Provide traffic impact study.
Provided — disregard this comment
8. Two loading berths are required in accordance with Section 21- 57.05, Table V-
10.
No comments
9. Remove access to project via Oak Branch Drive.
Darren recommends Danny speak with the HOA for Majestic Oakes regarding access.
10. A 100% gopher tortoise study of the site must be completed and provided.
No comments
11. Remove all references to "seeded ". All disturbed areas must be sodded.
No comments
12. Indicate eventual stormwater outfall to a public conveyance.
No comments
13. Door to dumpster enclosure must be stockade wood.
No comments
SP 0615 — Edgewater Pointe
Technical Review Committee Minutes
December 12, 2006
14. Provide detail for masonry wall on the rear of the property.
No comments
15. Provide the following permits, if applicable:
a. FDOT
b. FFWC
c. DOH
d. DEP
No comments
Parking
1. The 15' vehicle back up area required by Section 21 -57.02 (f) is not met in the
northeast corner of the parking lot.
No comments
2. Recommend widening the one -way driveway in rear of the building.
See also QLHA comment #7
3. Remove wheel stop detail from plan.
No comments
Landscaping
1. Provide separate tree plan to include existing trees, their sizes, what trees are to be
removed and what trees will remain. This is necessary to verify compliance with
Volusia County tree protection standards (15% of the square footage of any
development shall be designated for the protection must remain on site).
Can be cumulative
2. Provide irrigation plan.
No comments
3. Indicate number, type and size of shrubs in the rear buffer area.
No comments
4. Plan indicates Bahia sod to be used. Indicate where it will be installed.
No comments
Building Department
1. Construction drawings shall comply with the 2004 Florida Building Codes for
120 MPH wind speed within the impact debris region and the National Electric
Code, 2002 Edition.
No comments
2. The type of construction was not noted on the plans.
No comments
3. No floor plans were submitted for review.
No comments
4. Tenant separation will be required based on type of occupant.
No comments
Fire - Rescue Department
1. The required fire flow for this project is 2500 gallons per minute.
No comments
SP 0615 — Edgewater Pointe
Technical Review Committee Minutes
December 12, 2006
2. An additional hydrant must be provided to meet the maximum distance
requirement of 500 feet to the most remote exterior portion of the building.
No comments
3. On sheet 3 of 6, correct phone number for Fire Marshal's Office is 424 -2400
x1503.
No comments
City engineer (Quentin L. Hampton Associates)
1. A SJRWMD permit is required and a copy of such should be provided to the City.
No comments
2. Proposed six foot high screening wall will also function as a stormwater retaining
wall; construction details /design and sections should be provided. Sections of the
lateral swales should also be provided showing elevations /grading at both sides of
property line.
No comments
3. A NPDES construction permit is required and a copy of such should be provided
to the City.
No comments
4. Site plan should designate proposed water services; including sizes. Applicable
notes /details should be included for the required work.
No comments
5. It is suggested that the City require extension of 8" water main across frontage
along US 1.
No comments
6. Water meter /backflow preventer should be provided at the right of way line per
City standard details.
No comments
7. Existing lift station should be checked to confirm condition and capacity to serve
the proposed building.
Terry will look into this item. Lift station will need upgrading of pumps and possibly wet
well.
8. The force main from the lift station and electrical /water services should be located
and shown on the site plan.
No comments
9. The proposed wall appears to be in conflict with the existing sewer. This should
be verified.
No comments
10. A FDOT permit for the US 1 driveway improvements is required and a copy of
such should be provided to the City.
No comments
11. Five ADA compliant parking spaces should be provided per FBC, Section
11.4.1.2.5. Only four are shown on the plans.
No comments
SP 0615 — Edgewater Pointe
Technical Review Committee Minutes
December 12, 2006
12. No more than ten parking spaces in a row should occur and shall have a minimum
10' wide landscaped island in between in accordance with Section 25 -54.03 (d) of
the Land Development Code.
No comments
13. Dumpster pad details on sheet 2 show a 15' wide dumpster while the site plan
shows 12' wide pad. Correct to City standard details.
No comments
14. Adequate signs should be provided for the one -way driveway at the back of the
building.
No comments
15. Number the parking spaces for location and reference purposes.
No comments
16. Sidewalks along US 1 and Oak Branch should be provided.
No comments
17. The graphic scales on the site plan and on the plan block are not correct, please
revise.
No comments
18. The site plan existing elevation contours do not agree with the survey, specifically
at the southwest corner.
No comments
19. The existing median on Oak Branch may need to be modified for left turns from
driveway. Turning radii should be shown on site plan.
No comments
Department of Environmental Services
1. The existing lift station at the site has several severe limitations pertaining to its
flow handling capability. The wetwell is shallow and of small diameter and the
existing pumps are pumping at designed capacity. City staff is willing to work
with the project engineer to explore how best to address this problem.
See QLHA comment #7
2. The access provided through the development to the lift station does not appear to
be adequate for larger utility vehicles such as garbage trucks, the vac truck or the
tanker truck for maneuverability. In addition, when working on the lift station the
end of the truck will inhibit traffic flow due to the depth of the access area.
Will widen access
3. The planting of live oaks on both sides of the lift station area will eventually
become a problem with the trucks as well.
No comments
4. When Majestic Oaks subdivision was constructed, a water line was teed off across
the entrance for future looping of the water line. It is the City's intent to extend
this water line from Majestic Oaks to the water line that ends approximately 160'
south of Silver Circle. In order to accomplish this, two things will need to be
acquired from the developer:
a. An easement is needed along the front of the property to allow this water
line extension as well as provide higher fire flows in the area for
protection of the shopping center.
SP 0615 — Edgewater Pointe
Technical Review Committee Minutes
December 12, 2006
b. Mr. Johns will need to provide design and permitting of this water line for
construction. Further discussion of this will be required.
No comments
5. The backflow prevention device for the two -inch potable water line must be a
reduced pressure backflow prevention device as approved by the City of
Edgewater.
No comments
6. For the engineer, developer and contractor's knowledge, there is a six -inch AC
water line along the east bank of the canal that will need to be protected.
City will locate
7. The block wall leaves little access to the above referenced water line, the canal
and sewer line and force main on the west side of this project. A wider access
easement behind this wall is desired.
No comments
8. It appears the wall is the containing wall for the pond water. Design detail for the
block wall will need to be added to the plans.
No comments
9. The concrete spillways need to be moved out of the dumpster area to provide best
management practices in stormwater control.
No comments