09-07-2007 - Budget Workshop CITY COUNCIL OF EDGEWATER
BUDGET WORKSHOP
SEPTEMBER 7, 2007
9:00 A.M.
COMMUNITY CENTER
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Thomas called the Budget Workshop to order at 9:00 a.m. in the
Community Center.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Michael Thomas Present
Councilwoman Debra Rogers Present
Councilman Dennis Vincenzi Present
Councilwoman Harriet Rhodes Present
Councilwoman Judith Lichter Present
City Manager Jon Williams Present
City Clerk Susan Wadsworth Present
City Attorney Carolyn Ansay Excused
INVOCATION /PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
There was a silent invocation and pledge of allegiance to the Flag.
DISCUSSION REGARDING FY 2007/2008 BUDGET
City Manager Williams welcomed the Council to their final budget
workshop before they get into the final two public hearings scheduled
for September 10 and September 24
City Manager Williams pointed out he understood there was a vicious
rumor circulating on the street that they were here today to discuss
outsourcing of the Police and Fire departments. He assured everyone
in the audience they weren't here to discuss the outsourcing of the
Public Safety Services at all to any other entity at this point in
time. They have some significant issues they would be covering here
today, one being contract negotiations.
City Manager Williams turned the workshop over to Finance Director
Brett Tanner. He informed Council after the presentation he would
address some significant issues that remained outstanding and provide
a recommendation or suggestion on adopting the millage rate.
Finance Director Tanner went through the attached Powerpoint
Presentation. He also referred to the CAFR, the DR420 and the paper
budget he handed out.
1
Council Workshop
September 7, 2007
' S
Finance Director Tanner started his presentation by describing the
Property Tax Reform. He commented on the Maximum Millage Levy
Calculation Preliminary Disclosure DR -420 M -P. City Manager Williams
commented on provisions in House Bill 1B. As long as they follow the
2/3 vote in the event they adopt a higher millage rate then they do
not forfeit or jeopardize any future years revenue sharing.
Mr. Tanner then commented on Revenue Decreases with regard to the
Housing Market and Florida's General Economy.
Mayor Thomas asked about the building permits and if that was just a
house or if it was any type of permit. Mr. Tanner informed him it was
for 21 new residential and 6 new commercial.
Councilman Vincenzi asked what the decrease in building permits was a
function of. City Manager Williams informed him it was the general
condition of the economy and not a result of anything Edgewater had
done specifically. Councilman Vincenzi commented on this being a
general trend going throughout the whole country. Councilwoman Rogers
stated they have a report they put out every quarter that indicates
the potential for that to rise and it will as soon as the market
conditions change.
Councilwoman Lichter felt Florida was particularly hurt with the
building situation and maybe even this area, anything along water,
because it is so hard to get insurance especially on the manufactured
homes that seniors are living in if they wish to sell.
City Manager Williams pointed out with Florida's construction industry
it is a major part of our economy here. He spoke of an article in the
News Journal regarding the number of children in Volusia County
schools declining. A majority of the folks are leaving due to higher
taxes, insurance and no jobs for the folks in the construction
industry which all has a major impact.
Mr. Tanner then commented on the Personnel Cost Parameters. City
Manager Williams informed Council the final budget would represent a
3% wage increase, which was a negotiating point. He felt this was
consistent with the Consumer Price Index.
Mr. Tanner then described the Discussion Points. He referred to Page
16 of the CAFR by describing the General Fund Balance Sheet.
Mr. Tanner then commented on the City Wide Cash Condition with regard
to the Operating Funds with regard to General Fund, Water & Sewer
Fund, Refuse Fund, Stormwater Fund and Animal Shelter Fund.
City Manager Williams referred to a presentation made by Kelly Leary
from McDermit Davis describing they may be at fund balance at $2.2
2
Council Workshop
September 7, 2007
million but since they have an accounts receivable on the books, in
governmental accounting in General Fund, it specifically with regards
to accounts receivables, they are measureable and available and
usually due and payable within 60 days. Since they can't reimburse
themselves the $1.3 million within 60 days they can't continue to
carry it on the books as a receivable for an indefinite period of
time. He commented on the emphasis that has been placed on trying to
boost their cash. He made mention of there being a lot of
transactions that would be taking place at the end of the fiscal year
and having very little money coming in at this point in time in the
budget and they were getting ready to send a lot of money out.
He spoke of looking at the City from a cash perspective and what they
can put their hands on in the event of a major disaster.
Councilwoman Lichter asked generally what percentage of the taxes that
are supposed to come in comes in. She asked him if he was having
trouble collecting the taxes. City Manager Williams commented on
doing very well with their tax collections. He further explained tax
revenue and looking at just the money that is necessary to cover the
debt service out of the General Fund representing close to 1/3 of the
City's tax revenue which was used to fund the most essential services.
When they start looking at fixed costs and they take the ad valorem
taxes and subtract out the debt service from that they run short very
quickly. He also mentioned the condition of the overall economy at
this point in time. If the overall tax collections are $6 million and
the fixed costs is $2 million that is 1/3 right there and they take
the other 2/3 and try to fund the essential services out of it they
find they start consuming that guaranteed money very quickly and then
they move into relying on State Revenue Sharings, which were predicted
to be down.
Councilwoman Lichter felt it would be interesting to find out what
percentage other cities collect in taxes of what they are supposed to.
City Manager Williams pointed out someone may go two years without
paying their tax bill but at some point it goes to a tax sale so they
would get the money eventually. He also spoke about possibly seeing a
fallout because of the high foreclosure rate. They have generally
done fairly well in the past with projecting their ad valorem revenues
verses actual.
Mr. Tanner then pointed out that the Water & Sewer Fund and Stormwater
Fund were in the red and with these being Enterprise Funds they should
support themselves. He then went over the FY2008 Proposed
Surplus /Deficit.
Councilwoman Lichter was confused on the Animal Shelter. Mr. Tanner
informed her it would be a deficit of $10,283. It will cost more than
it brings in. Councilwoman Lichter stated they are trying very hard
to become an Enterprise Fund and going up with all prices to do that.
3
Council Workshop
September 7, 2007
City Manager Williams informed her between now and Monday they were
going to go back and look at those projected revenues and expenditures
to see if they can bring forward a projected cash balance.
Mr. Tanner stated right now they were looking at the City as a whole
because they have to. They have to get to a point where they are
looking at funds individually. They are netting cash to supply
payroll just to pay the bills. They are netting everything together
to make it which was fine but they should be doing it on an individual
fund level.
Mr. Tanner then referred to Page 73 in the CAFR regarding the
Stormwater Management Fund with regard to Assets and Liabilities and
Page 74 with regard to the Income Statement. City Manager Williams
commented on exchanging an asset for an asset but in this case cash is
the most liquid form of an asset and that was what they seemed to be
lacking the most in and where the emphasis was being placed.
Mr. Tanner then commented on grants and having to wait for the
reimbursement of the grants.
Mr. Tanner then described the Summary of Funds with regard to revenues
and expenses.
Mr. Tanner then identified the General Fund Description the General
Fund Revenue by Source and Expenditures by Department. He referred to
Page 4 of the Preliminary Budget with regard to the General Fund
Revenue and Expenditure Summary.
Councilwoman Lichter asked if there was a lawsuit going on right now
that was connected with ParkTowne. City Manager Williams commented on
the lawsuit that was nearing its final stages as a result of the
height amendment that was passed that was filed by Oscar Zeller and
Julian Greene. They were working on closing that lawsuit out
presently but there was one out there that remained opened.
Councilwoman Lichter asked if the cost of that lawsuit was in this
year's budget. City Manager Williams informed her they turned it over
to our insurance carrier and would pay accordingly anything above and
beyond. He didn't know if there would be any additional cost besides
the deductible. That was yet to be determined.
Councilwoman Lichter asked if that was the one lawsuit connected with
ParkTowne. City Manager Williams informed her of one more that he
thought would resolve itself with the installation of the con span
across the drainage canal. They didn't know the status at this point
in time.
City Manager Williams identified the significant reduction in the
proposed capital that he has been addressing and talking about
4
Council Workshop
September 7, 2007
throughout the last year. He felt they needed to start addressing
their emerging capital which they hadn't been doing. His goal has
always been to strike a balance and put themselves in a position where
they plan for those items. They are going to be bringing forward a
proposal to set up reserve accounts in the Capital Projects Budget and
ask that they place restrictions on those reserve accounts. Hopefully
they can transition their operating policies and procedures into a
scenario where they are generating excess cash, meet their unreserved
Charter requirement and anything above that would be allocated to the
reserve accounts.
Councilwoman Lichter stated they were predicting before the fact that
a vehicle at a certain mileage won't be good any more. She was
wondering if they were prejudging what they needed and maybe something
could be used longer. City Manager Williams commented on using the
industry standard for emergency response vehicles and trying to
establish a replacement schedule for those vehicles. Five years or
100,000 miles is typically what they look at. He commented on all but
three of the vehicles in the Police Department being at or exceeding
the 100,000 miles. He mentioned Leisure Services Director Jack
Corder's crew using mowers that are over 12 years old. At some point
the maintenance costs start to exceed the cost of a new mower.
Councilwoman Lichter commented on upgrading their vehicles in the
beginning and maybe them lasting longer and being more secure. Mayor
Thomas commented on the strain the police officers put on their
vehicles and the vehicles not being driven the same as a person would
drive their personal vehicle. City Manager Williams pointed out when
new vehicles are purchased, the new vehicles seem to get used the
most.
Councilwoman Rogers mentioned this not being done in the past and
wanting to do it now. She spoke of this not being required but felt
it should be just as the Charter Reserve requirement.
City Manager Williams commented on the debt schedule and satisfying a
lot of the needs in the past by going out and securing debt. They are
trying to change their processes by getting into the replacement
without adding fixed costs in the form of debt. Mayor Thomas felt it
would be foolish not to do that.
Mr. Tanner then referred to Page 7 of the Preliminary Budget with
regard to the General Fund Budget Summary including taxes, licenses
and permits, intergovernmental revenues and charges for services.
Councilman Vincenzi asked about revenue the City receives because of
our Fire Department responding to County calls. He questioned if that
covered the cost of the actual cost. Mr. Tanner didn't know right now
and hadn't done an analysis on that. Councilman Vincenzi was under
the assumption that when they make a call to a County area it costs
5
Council Workshop
September 7, 2007
Edgewater a certain amount and we get reimbursed a certain amount but
it really doesn't cover that cost. He further commented on the
increase of 14% and this really not covering the cost of Edgewater's
response even though it has gone up.
City Manager Williams commented on 25% of calls Edgewater responded to
being in the County. If they allocated 25% of their total budget for
last year, they would find that it fell short and that was something
he planned on addressing with the County. Fire Chief Barlow commented
on when they initially entered into the agreement and it being
calculated on about 60% of the incidents that truck would cover going
into the unincorporated area and this being how they came up with the
figure.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked if the amount the City is paid by the County
actually covers the actual cost of what the City is spending. Fire
Chief Barlow explained what they receive from the County actually
exceeds. Councilwoman Rhodes asked if the County's funding the
service it is getting from Edgewater. Fire Chief Barlow informed her
in his opinion it exceeds.
Councilman Vincenzi asked how much it costs to go on a call. Fire
Chief Barlow informed him the countywide average and VCOG rate was
$777. Councilman Vincenzi then asked how much it costs to go on a
call in a County area. Fire Chief Barlow agreed to break it down and
get back to him.
Councilwoman Lichter asked about servicing the enclaves within the
City that are actually in the County. She asked if the City services
them if they count towards the County or are they saying they are
within the City's boundaries. Fire Chief Barlow informed her the City
does get compensated.
Councilwoman Lichter asked if the County services anything further
south, closer to Oak Hill. Fire Chief Barlow commented on the County
station in Oak Hill and where they respond. City Manager Williams
commented on trying to identify what drives cost and the services they
provide. He spoke of calls driving those costs. He thinks when they
go back to the table with the County this year they are going to look
at cleaning that agreement up, the 60/40 split because 25% of our
calls into unincorporated Volusia County at $777 in his opinion does
not cover the cost of the City providing that service.
Mayor Thomas called a ten - minute recess at this time and informed
everyone they would reconvene at 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Tanner then referred to Page 8 of the Preliminary Budget and
described the General Fund Expenditures by Department.
6
Council Workshop
September 7, 2007
.
City Manager Williams commented on everything they were talking about
being negated by the significant issues that remained outstanding as
of September 7, 2007.
City Manager Williams informed Council it was their pleasure if they
wanted to go through individual funds or discuss the significant
issues.
Mayor Thomas asked about the Council expenditures being up by 4 %. Mr.
Tanner referred to Page 9 of the Preliminary Budget and explained the
increase. City Manager Williams felt the increase was as a result of
the increase in medical insurance. He also commented on Council
possibly falling into a year where they were due to get a pay raise.
Councilman Vincenzi suggested compensating for the increase in medical
insurance by decreasing promotional activities. City Manager Williams
informed him they could do that.
Councilwoman Rogers identified the $2,000 in travel and per diem. She
didn't think any of the Council were doing anything there. She
thought any of the Council that were doing dinners were paying for
them themselves. Councilman Vincenzi asked if anyone was claiming
mileage. Councilwoman Lichter informed him she was for the two of the
four WAV meetings she attends.
Councilwoman Rhodes commented on the life insurance. The Council
asked staff to cut that out. Councilwoman Lichter stated she didn't
even know she had life insurance. City Manager Williams informed
Councilwoman Rhodes that not everyone asked for the life insurance to
be cut out. He informed Council that was their medical insurance.
Councilman Vincenzi, Mayor Thomas, Councilwoman Rogers and
Councilwoman Rhodes informed City Manager Williams he could cut theirs
out.
City Manager Williams informed them they needed to verify it wouldn't
negatively affect their rates. Mayor Thomas commented on going with
Brown & Brown for the health insurance that had a reduction. City
Manager Williams informed him it was still an overall increase of
$5.4% over last year's rates. He agreed to get it down. Mayor Thomas
felt they had to set the example. If they don't do it, then how can
they expect the employees to do it? Councilwoman Rhodes stated and if
that means no raise, then no raise. Councilwoman Rogers asked what
percentage the raise was. City Manager Williams informed her it was
based on the CPI. Councilwoman Rogers stated then don't do a raise.
That would be it. No raise and no promotional activities. Mr. Tanner
informed her that would get them under.
Councilwoman Lichter commented on paying dues to certain organizations
and then they no longer go to their meetings. They have to figure out
some plan so they can see what is going on at these meetings.
7
Council Workshop
September 7, 2007
City Manager Williams asked City Clerk Wadsworth how much the MPO was.
City Clerk Wadsworth informed him it was based on population.
Councilwoman Lichter felt some type of representation at the
countywide meetings was very important. Mayor Thomas agreed. City
Clerk Wadsworth informed her Mayor Thomas and Councilwoman Rogers
attend those. Councilwoman Rogers pointed out she does the MPO and
Councilwoman Lichter does WAV. Councilwoman Lichter commented on
attending the meetings but felt they should attend the dinners where
all the cities get together and they have a presentation. They are
paying money to be part of it that way. City Manager Williams agreed
to address it and go forward.
City Manager Williams asked Council if they wanted to move to the
Significant Issues or go line by line through the budget. He
mentioned the proposed budget being affected by the significant issues
that remained outstanding.
It was the consensus of Council to address the Significant Issues.
(Attached)
City Manager Williams identified the significant issues that remained
outstanding as of today by starting with the General Employee Pension
Plan.
Councilman Vincenzi stated right now the way the plan stands, it is
going to result in a contribution of $48.25% or $1,222,000. He asked
how they were going to direct Principal to come back with
modifications and how it would affect the plan. They cannot afford to
pay the current amount the way it is. They can't do any band aid
treatments on it. It has to be modified to an acceptable level which
will affect the benefits the employees get. If they are to keep the
funding down to $600,000 on the City's part, how would that affect the
employees' benefits? The way the plan states now, people can retire
at 55 and continue working.
City Manager Williams explained the bottom line is to control those
costs they are going to have to adjust the benefits downward. They
have provided Council, the employees and the citizens with the
information as of the last workshop and those options would remain out
there. He felt at the end of the day they would find that the
modifications are probably what is proposed and the next step would be
to make sure it was in accordance with Chapter 112. If they are
successful in getting those modifications in place, they would free up
approximately $600,000. Councilman Vincenzi stated there is no if
they are successful. They can't keep going like this.
City Manager Barlow stated in the interest of full disclosure they
could have taken two different approaches and he decided to say that
8
Council Workshop
September 7, 2007
the best course of action was to fund it with the intention they are
going to be getting the modifications. He could have left the funding
at 24% in t he budget and just put $600,000 in appropriation to fund
balance and they could have used that as their fund to fulfill this
obligation in the event that they were not successful in getting
modifications in place. He chose to fund it at the $1.2 million in
hopes that they are successful in getting the modifications in place
midyear and they can free up that money for their fund balance. He
spoke of the challenges they face in getting those modifications in
place. It is the benefits that are provided that are guiding the
cost.
Mayor Thomas stated if he remembered correctly a motion was made to
underfund and it passed and evidently it is in violation of Florida
Statutes. He asked how they were going to correct that. City Manager
Williams stated they were in a budget workshop and the consensus was
to underfund. On the agenda Monday night he was bringing forward a
motion for Council to approve so that item would be taken off the
agenda. Councilman Vincenzi confirmed they weren't going to take any
action except fund this for next year. City Manager Williams stated
in hopes that they get modifications in place as Council has
expressed.
Councilwoman Lichter confirmed this was not for the Police Pension or
the Fire Pension and specifically for the General Employees Pension.
She then mentioned this affecting 57 employees, some of who are not
eligible to retire and some who are working and still accruing
benefits, which she felt was unusual.
City Manager Williams informed Council last Friday they sent out a
silent ballot for the employees to express whether or not they wanted
to pursue these individual modifications or not. Rumor mill coming
back to them is that a majority of the employees are not going to
respond or of those that do respond they were going to put individual
caveats on it, which he felt was an indication of the issues they have
dealt with all along.
Councilman Vincenzi felt City Manager Williams really needed to
resolve this problem. They can't keep continuing to put this off.
City Manager Williams felt staff brought forward the options to fix
it. It was now up to Council. Councilman Vincenzi felt there was no
meat behind that. It's okay here are your options. Please consider
it otherwise we will just go back to what we were doing. Councilwoman
Rhodes stated Council was the one that had to do it. Councilman
Vincenzi commented on the Pension Board having to agree to it as well.
The only thing Council can do is terminate it. City Manager Williams
stated Council has the options and the Pension Board has had the
options, which remained the same as they were six months ago.
Councilman Vincenzi felt City Manager Williams needed to bring
something forward at the meeting on Monday that would resolve it.
9
Council Workshop
September 7, 2007
. ,
Mayor Thomas agreed and stated this problem has existed for several
years. Councilwoman Rhodes has heard it over and over again from
Council that for years and years this problem has existed. This
problem has not existed for years and years. In 2002 they had a
problem with the Pension and that was due to September 11 when the
stock market fell. In 2005 they had a problem with the Pension due to
inflated wages because of the hurricane so that sent their costs up
higher. She believes the problem right now is the people that are
collecting and accruing. That cannot continue or the number will
continue to go up. That needs to be resolved.
Councilman Vincenzi felt some kind of resolution one way or the other
had to be done. The option to leave it the way it is is not feasible.
Councilwoman Rhodes felt that was not an option. Councilman Vincenzi
stated it either needed to be modified or terminated. He felt this
was the resolution City manager Williams needed to come forward with
on Monday or at the very next meeting. City Manager Williams asked
Council what they wanted to do and told them if they wanted to
terminate it, terminate it.
Councilman Vincenzi stated they talked about this before that the
options were to give the Board six months to either modify it or to
discuss the modifications and come back with an acceptable
modification to the plan that wouldn't bankrupt the city.
Councilwoman Rogers stated they were going to do the six months if
they underfunded but because of Florida Statutes Chapter 112
underfunding and six months is out the door so they are back to modify
or terminate, no ifs, ands or buts. To say whether this has just come
to light in 2002 or 2005 or it has been around for a while. Even
though it hasn't been brought to light each of the past several years,
only a few of the last several years, it has been a problem sitting
there because it is an accrual. The accrual was under most of those
years and in some years it didn't come to light as much as it has in
these last few, 2002 and 2005 respectively, but because they didn't
have those same budget problems in some years as they did in other
years. They have been able to live off the fat and it's getting less
and less so they have to get to the reality. It is an accrual. It is
an estimate and isn't easy to do according to the actuary so they have
to modify it or terminate it. She would be more for modification than
terminating it but she was concerned that modifying was even going to
fix it. City Manager Williams commented on paying for the advice
given by Principal. He felt the issue at hand wasn't the City Manager
coming forward with a solution. The City Manager has come forward
with a solution. He has two bodies that now he has to get to mutually
agree, the Council and the General Employees Pension Board. He
further commented on it resulting in a reduction of benefits and that
is what it is going to take to control these costs. He personally
thought the modifications were the best of everything that was out
10
Council Workshop
September 7, 2007
there proposed but other folks haven't quite seen that the same way as
the City Manager has seen that.
Councilwoman Lichter commented on a letter from their accountant or
from Principal explaining that they never believed in the beginning
that everybody would be retiring taking in this kind of option that
when they were going to retire they would really retire. Three of the
Council have been on the Council for a number of years. She didn't
want to say that she feels she is responsible for something she didn't
write but maybe they didn't bite the bullet until it became acute.
They have so much respect for their employees and didn't want to do
that. She thought maybe something so detrimental could go away. Now
she is of the opinion that since they can't fund it, they aren't going
to have six months to be able to wait for it to go back and forth more
and they are going to have to make a very difficult decision. She
stated within a lifetime of pensions things change that you have been
promised and used herself as an example. She further spoke of
economics changing as well as situations changing. She felt Principal
was also somewhat responsible. All of the employees have to
understand this could boomerang and affect all of the employees.
City Manager Williams commented on the e -mail from Tim Hollinger and
Cory Webber with Principal Financial Group dated in 2003 that was
given to Council. As they sit there and talk about potential
liability Principal was listening very tentatively and are posturing
themselves for potential lawsuit. They have basically said they told
the City way back when that this potentially could be a very expensive
benefit before they even knew that there was potential that this could
drive the necessity to modify this plan. When you start talking about
liability, who is really liable? He wasn't defending Principal
Financial Group, he just felt they were listening very closely and
that was the reason that e -mail was given to Council.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked why they didn't change the funding. City
Manager Williams informed her that came from Council and the Board.
They are going to tell Council they assumed up until 2005 that
everybody left at normal retirement date. In 2005 there was a change
to represent that only 40% of those people would leave. Now they are
telling them no, that wasn't in fact what has happened. What has
happened is 100% of those people want change. They will tell them
that they did assume it and they have told them if a bunch of people
took advantage of this it may drive the cost to the extent that
modifications were necessary. They will tell them that the City
directed them to change the 40 %. Councilwoman Rhodes felt they should
have assumed it. She felt they were wrong.
Councilwoman Lichter didn't feel they should at this point,
unprepared, discuss a lawsuit that may well happen with citizens. She
thinks they are going to have to do something. When you retire, you
retire or if you want to keep working you don't accrue benefits. City
11
Council Workshop
September 7, 2007
Manager Williams commented on digressing from the real subject at
hand. Liability and who is and who is not at fault. The bottom line
is the benefits have got to be changed to control costs. It is going
to take Council and the Board coming together saying modifications are
the direction that it is going to go in. Councilman Vincenzi stated
that was fine but asked what the other options were. City Manager
Williams informed him to terminate it or freeze it.
Councilwoman Rogers stated what they have to also think is next year
the Council will be more restricted on what they put out as a millage.
They better be thinking of a worst case scenario. They don't want to
have to revisit this decision again and change it. They needed to be
thinking down the road, not just today.
City Manager Williams continued his presentation by describing the
Collective Bargaining Agreements with regard to Wages, Sick Cash In,
Vacation Cash In, Sick Time, Vacation Time, Insurance, Pay Cycle and
Holiday.
Councilman Vincenzi questioned why everyone was so opposed to bi-
weekly pay. City Manager Williams informed him they said it causes a
financial strain. Staff believed with three months advanced notice
that these changes are coming that this would be an ample amount of
time for folks to prepare.
There was a brief discussion regarding attempting to go bi- weekly in
the past and this being an in -house savings.
There was also a discussion regarding removing Presidents Day and
adding a Floating Holiday.
There was a discussion regarding negotiating the whole package verses
individual items when they negotiate a contract. City Manager
Williams commented on being disappointed that it has gotten to this
point. They have spent the last year making their way through the
city trying to educate the employees on their current situation,
encouraging them to be a part of the solution to help control costs.
He further commented on direction from Council to try and keep all of
employees and not lay anybody off. They feel they have done that and
have made all the compromises. He further spoke of having to shift
their focus into identifying jobs and people. They feel there may be
some opportunities to go back to the table, which would require action
from Council.
City Manager Williams continued his presentation by describing the
Insurance Quotes (Property, Casualty, Workers' Compensation).
Mayor Thomas asked if negotiations had been successfully completed
with the Fire Department. City Manager Williams informed him they
weren't recognized at this point and they were still moving through
12
Council Workshop
September 7, 2007
the process. Their contract would probably come up mid -year which
would start in 2009. Mayor Thomas then asked about the General
Employees. City Manager Williams informed him they weren't here yet
and planned to meet after the first budget hearing and try to
renegotiate.
City Manager Williams advised Council of a potential policy change
that he thought would be highly controversial at best but it would
attempt to address overtime within the Fire Department. He commented
on things he and Fire Chief Barlow have talked about to reduce
overtime.
There was then a brief discussion regarding reducing the millage rate
since fiscal year 2004/2005 little by little like they planned to do.
City Manager Williams pointed out they had accomplished the goals the
Council had set out with regard to the reduction of the millage rate,
the sale of ParkTowne and reducing the debt. They would continue to
set and work towards new goals.
Mayor Thomas called a ten - minute recess at this time. The meeting
recessed at 11:00 a.m. and reconvened at 11:10 a.m.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked about the revenue and expense figures, which
was based on taking the budget at 5.20/1,000 of taxable value. She
expressed concern with having $434,776 net cash in the General Fund
and needing $1.9 million for their Cash Reserves. City Manager
Williams presented his suggestions on how to deal with the Charter
requirement such as no pay raises and eliminating jobs.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked if they set a millage rate of 5.37 how many
dollars that would be. City Manager Williams estimated it would get
them an additional $200,000. Councilwoman Rhodes mentioned this not
bringing them close to their Charter requirement. She asked how they
are okay with that. Why is it they don't necessarily have to meet
that Charter requirement? How do they pick and choose the ones they
are going to follow and the ones they are not? She has been through
this every year since she has been on Council. City Manager Williams
informed her he wasn't okay with that but felt it boiled down to
Council saying it was unacceptable and that they do whatever is
necessary to get them to those Charter limits. He spoke of these
being unpleasant points they have to discuss.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked what happened if pension modifications were
made before September 24th and brings that pension number down. City
Manager Williams informed her they would start generating excess cash.
If those modifications go in that equates to about $220,000 in the
General Fund. He figured out how much excess cash they would have
with the pension plan modifications and increasing the millage from
13
Council Workshop
September 7, 2007
5.20 to 5.37 which would get them pretty close to the Charter
requirement. He further commented on ratifying the contracts.
City Manager Williams informed Council they would have to have super
majority in order to adopt the millage rate of 5.37. He incorporated
into the table the discussions they had at the Executive Session
regarding the Collective Bargaining Agreements. Councilwoman Rhodes
pointed out they didn't have money to negotiate any more with the
unions than what is already being offered. Any extra money they have
has got to meet the Cash Reserve as the Charter requires.
City Manager Williams asked if that was direction to declare the
impasse and go through the process. There was then a discussion
regarding the process if there was an impasse. Ultimately at the end
of the day it would be back in front of Council. Councilwoman Lichter
felt there might be elements that might be negotiable if City Manager
Williams didn't negotiate as a whole. City Manager Williams informed
her it wasn't the City's job to handle. That is the FOP and PEA reps
and the union reps they have working for the City. He encourages the
employees to get informed.
Councilwoman Rogers wanted to clarify what was on the table under the
City was what they talked about at the Executive Session. City
Manager Williams informed her what was in the table was what they had
approached the membership with. After they have talked in the
Executive Session and they go in and incorporate all those items that
they have talked about it is necessary to raise the millage rate.
Councilwoman Rogers asked if they would have an answer Monday night
pertaining to what they talked about at the Executive Session and the
impact on their budget. City Manager Williams commented on why they
needed to know that they had that millage rate before they go back to
the table.
Councilwoman Rogers commented on this telling them more or less what
their decisions needed to be on the pension and collective bargaining.
They have to act as if they don't have super majority when they are
making this decision.
City Manager Williams commented on needing direction from Council in
order to have a smooth transition on Monday night.
Councilwoman Lichter felt the Reserve Fund had to catch up but she
didn't think that in one sitting they could plug the whole hole of the
Reserve Fund after they got slammed with hurricanes and didn't get
back from FEMA what they thought they would. She thinks they have to
put more in there and pray for the best that nothing else hits them
with force.
14
Council Workshop
September 7, 2007
Councilwoman Rogers felt next year would be worse as far as the
millage. City Manager Williams spoke of Council disapproving a line
of credit. He spoke of trying to strike a balance. Councilwoman
Rhodes stated the Charter doesn't give them the flexibility to strike
a balance. They don't have that option. They all swore to uphold the
Charter of the City and they aren't doing it.
Mayor Thomas asked Councilwoman Rhodes if he was telling her 5.37.
Councilwoman Rhodes informed him in her opinion it was irresponsible
to not do it.
Mayor Thomas asked City Manager Williams what his recommendation was.
City Manager Williams informed him 5.37 since that was the highest
they could go. He spoke of the TRIM notice going out at 5.37. He
also spoke of the other variable that may come along and hurt them to
some extent being the value adjustment boards. The final tax roll
number may change fairly significantly.
Councilman Vincenzi felt things needed to change in the City. He
thought they were making progreess by reducing the millage rate every
year since they had a change in Council. He thinks the employees
needed to realize the City just didn't have money. Raising the
millage from 5.2 to 5.37 to get an extra $200,000, he didn't think
would make much difference. He felt 5.2 was something he didn't like
but would be willing to vote on. He didn't like doing the 5.37 when
they declared the millage rate. He felt there had to be a lot more
compromise on the part of employees as far as benefits and things of
that nature for the City to survive. This is just another band aid
they are sticking on the budget.
City Manager Williams stated having not personally gone through the
experience of an impasse and only going on what he has heard, he is
clearly there that is where they want to go. It was his understanding
it was a very highly emotional process. They have to go in knowing
that they have reached their limits when they adopt that budget or it
would have consequences.
Councilman Vincenzi commented on always charging more. He felt it was
not the responsible thing to do to increase the millage for raises,
benefits and retirement contributions. Councilwoman Rhodes wanted to
raise the millage so that they meet their Charter requirement.
Councilman Vincenzi felt for the Council to do that there had to be
more of a compromise on the employees side than just raising this to
5.37, which would not get them there. Councilwoman Rhodes stated it
would help. She wasn't saying to give the employees more than they
are able to give them. Nobody wants to raise the tax rate to give
more. They want to raise the tax rate to generate cash in the bank
for this City. They are irresponsible to have a Reserve Fund of
$400,000. If another hurricane came, they would be sunk. She
mentioned having to pay to use a line of credit. Why would they not
15
Council Workshop
September 7, 2007
raise the millage rate and borrow less that they have to pay interest
on. Councilman Vincenzi felt if they declare they are willing to go
to this higher millage than they are going to burn up that money no
matter what. Councilwoman Rhodes stated only if Council allows it.
Councilman Vincenzi stated Council has allowed it in the past since he
has been up there. Councilwoman Lichter informed him he has been up
there with them. Councilman Vincenzi stated he was trying.
Councilwoman Rogers stated they have to look at today but they also
have to look at next year. They are going to have to have a lower
millage next year. Just because they could increase it to 5.37 to get
$200,000, that is a drop. They do need to meet the minimum Charter
requirement. Is it right for them to increase the tax to band aid
this? Two hundred thousand isn't going to cut it. They need to deal
with it now. They need to meet the Charter requirement. The cuts
need to be made. It needed to be a non - emotional cut. They have to
look at the numbers. She spoke of not having reserves for Capital
Outlay, which she felt they needed to do as well. If they tighten
their belts now and start setting the path, then next year will be
easier. They need to straighten it out now. She felt things would be
better for staff if they had a City reserve that met their Charter
requirement if something happens. She commented on the infrastructure
that is going on in the City that they aren't addressing. They need
to do what they have to now.
Councilwoman Rogers stated 5.37 wasn't going to make it. It's kind of
like an all or nothing. She felt $200,000 was a drop and wasn't going
to help them. City Manager Williams stated they may be there but they
couldn't predict that at this point in time in terms of budget. His
suggestion would be to adopt the millage rate at 5.37 and hope they
can negotiate all the other areas to get them down. Councilwoman
Rogers stated hope doesn't pay the bills.
Mayor Thomas commented on needing super majority and hearing two
Councilmembers against the 5.37 so he felt they needed to shoot for
the 5.20. Councilwoman Lichter stated she would be saying yes to
5.37. Mayor Thomas stated that was three Councilmembers.
Councilwoman Rogers commented on things they are dealing with that
still had to be negotiated. Councilwoman Rhodes stated even if they
increase the tax and modify the pension plan they still wouldn't be
where they wanted to be but they would at least be at $1.2 million.
She didn't know why they could not be thrown out of office for not
meeting the Charter requirement.
Councilwoman Rhodes wasn't saying because the rate was 5.37 to offer
any more. She was saying make it 5.37 so they have cash. City
Manager Williams confirmed she was talking about any more than what
they discussed at the Executive Session. Councilwoman Rhodes informed
him that was correct. Councilwoman Rogers stated they didn't know if
16
Council Workshop
September 7, 2007
they weren't going to have extra cash due to this being hypothetical.
She was pretty certain these were conservative meaning they probably
had a little more bottom line than what they are even showing. City
Manager Williams commented on not being able to predict what was going
to happen at the State level.
There was further discussion regarding the 15% to 25% minimum Charter
requirement with regard to taking excess money over the $1.9 million
and funding the Capital Reserve and keeping the unreserved at the 15 %.
City Manager Williams commented on issues in the past when a prior
City Manager was criticized for taxing and not spending the money and
they had a very large cash reserve. He thought maybe the idea then
was to take some of that large unreserved cash and start reserving it
for City Hall, equipment, etc.
Councilwoman Rhodes commented on wanting Council to put a City Hall
Fund in the budget years ago. City Manager Williams thought they
recognized they needed to do it. One hundred thousand dollars
contributed to a reserve fund is a start but when they are talking $14
million for a City Hall that would take a significant amount of time
to save.
Councilwoman Lichter asked City Manager Williams if they could present
the budget at 5.20 and 5.37 on Monday night. Mayor Thomas informed
her he wanted to know today.
Councilwoman Rogers stated they already told him how to reduce 3% in
the Council's budget. She asked if any of the other departments that
are not in the negative percentages could come down another 3 %. City
Manager Williams informed her they approached that and he thought the
answer was at the existing level of service, no. If they wanted to
compromise on the services they provide, then they could.
Councilwoman Rhodes asked if the departments not in the negative
weren't seeing negatives because of positions unfilled. City Manager
Williams commented on staff being very thin in terms of the folks
providing the services. Councilwoman Rogers has clients in retail
that are used to working a certain number of hours that are salary
that are still having to work additional hours and they are getting
the same pay just because they want to keep their job. City Manager
Williams agreed and said the employees are doing it and have been
doing it but at some point you reach that breaking point. That is
what they don't want taking place.
City Manager Williams commented on the Directors being given the
directive going into this to cut their budgets by 100. The last year
they have spent more time in the budget than they have in previous
years in trying to whittle all those costs that might not be
17
Council Workshop
September 7, 2007
necessary. At the end of the day this is what they feel is necessary
to operate the City.
City Manager Williams stated these folks have been operating with
vacant positions and have been required to work longer and harder than
just a few days or a few months. It's been that way for the last year
and a half and they are tired.
City Manager Williams commented on research he has done where he came
across Edward Demming who helped Japan revolutionize their country.
He has a theory that they can't constantly place an emphasis on cost
reduction because in doing so you are going to start suffering in the
quality of the services that are provided because they will have
increased turnover in staff and will have to do additional rework and
so forth to the extent it becomes counterproductive. He was starting
wonder if their philosophy was wrong and that they need to take a
different approach.
It was the consensus of Council to go with a millage rate of 5.20.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to discuss, the Budget Workshop
adjourned at 11:43 a.m.
Minutes submitted by:
Lisa Bloomer
18
Council Workshop
September 7, 2007
1O
CITY OF EDGEWATER
FY 2008
Budget Workshop
7 ,'""'� d
O ia . 0
s
AGENDA
• MILLAGE RATE DISCUSSION
• SUMMARY DISCUSSION ALL
FUNDS
• DISCUSSION POINTS
1
PROPERTY TAX REFORM
• HB1B
• DR -420
• DR -420 M -P
MILLAGE AD VALOREM
RATE REVENUE
FY2007 millage - 5.70 is 6% mer rolled back rate $ 6,825,695
'Millage rate between 5.3740 and 5.70 5.7 x 95%
Unanimous Note by City Council $ 6,484,410
FY2008 Rolled Back Rate - 5.3740 $ 6,435,313
Millage rate between 4.8903 and 5.3740 5.374 x 95%
Two-thirds Note by City Council (4 to 1 Note) $ 6,113,547
FY2008 Proposed Millage Rate - 4.8903 $ 5,856,207
Majority Note by City Council (3 to 1 Note) 4.8903 x 95%
$ 5,563,397
REVENUE DECREASES
1 Housing Market FY2007 FYD 2007 FY2008
New Building Permits 225 26 25
Effects General Fund reN.enue through the Building Department for permit sales.
Effects all Impact Fee funds.
Effects Enterprise Funds for Connection Fees.
2 Florida's general economy.
Most of the General Funds rewnues are directly related to state reN,enue sharing.
2
PERSONNEL COST
PARAMETERS
1 Wage increase
2 Health Insurance -8.60% Decrease
3 Fire Pension 16.80% of payroll
4 Police Pension 26.70% of payroll
5 General Pension 24.00% of payroll and underfunded by half.
6 Defined Contribution 12.00% of payroll
7 Vacationlsick Cash in none
DISCUSSION POINTS
• Fund Balance VS. Cash and Cash Equivalents.
• Fund Balance = Assets — Liabilities
• Fund Balance is not cash.
• General Fund Balance Sheet. Page 16 in CAFR.
3
CITY WIDE CASH CONDITION
I, ENDING CASH BALANCE I
FY2006 FY2007 t FY2008 r FY2008
[
)FUND ,.. Actual Estimate _i__Proposed_ _ _ Surplus/(E101dt)
General Fund 3,696,887 3,223,054 i 3,820,841 I 597,787
Water 8 Sewer Fund (1,013,069) (626,520) (495,855) i 130,665
'Refuse Fund 203,617 361,68 I 9 i 324,558 (37,031)
I (1,633,366) (1,352,009)1 (1,346,171) i 5,838
Animal Shelter Fund 0 0 : (10.283) (10,283)1
1,254,069 1,606,114 ' 2,293,090 _ i 686,976,
CITY WIDE CASH CONDITION
ENDING CASH BALANCE t 1'
1 i
i 1 •
FY2008 FY2007 - - I — ,Y20013 1 i FY2008
Olga Mittel, Estimate I" Proposed T - Surplus:(0.1UB )
!General Fund 3,698,887 3,223,054 1 3,820,841 • i 597,787 •
t
:Water 8 Sewee Fund 0,013,069) _ y326,52041 . 1 495.8551 1 130,665 :
Nefuse Fund 203,617 361,586 ; . 324„558 i . I 137.03U
EStommater Fund (1633,366) (1, 352,006)T - (1,346,171)) I 5,838
:Animal Shelter Fund 0 0 (10,283)1 I (10,283)
1,254,089 1,606,114 2,293,0901 I 686,976
i 1— T I
kLESG 66 289 o :
GRANTS (166269) (18,014) (18,014)1 I ----
:SLEW - - 12,672 25,0001 29,000 I*" 3,000
likb FEE - 494,211 '546,325 584,980 1 I 35,654'
IPOUCE IMPACT FEE 161,392 167,517 171.171 1- 1-
I ! 3,854
FIRE IMPACT FEE 393,988 400,766 408,781 1 I 8,015
RECREATION IMPACT FEE 228,480 208,195 44,370 L i ... _063,825)1
DEBT SERVICE 259,967 348,738 348,738 i r - - .
CAPITAL PROJECTS (8006) 1,714,258 1,724,288 I I 0
WATER DEVELOPMENT (807,303) 0 o ; I (597,566)1
SEWER DEVELOPMENT (864,099) .. 0 1 t (533,243)1
:
RENEWAL 8 REPLACEMENT (152,768) 01 0 1 i 0
(481,700) 3,407,071 1 3,293,570 : (1,244,311):
,.......
--- 792,389 --- 5,013, 186 5,586,660 ri ----- -'
.„.
4
SUMMARY OF FUNDS
SURPLUS/
REVENUES AND EXPENSES FY 2008 REVENUES EXPENSES (DEFICIT)
GENERAL FUND 13,289,355 12,691,568 597,787
LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND 10,000 10,000 0
GRANTS FUND 573,070 573,070 0
SPECIAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TRUST FUND 29,000 29,000 0
ROAD IMPACT FEE 35,654 0 35,654
POLICE IMPACT FEE FUND 3,767 113 3,654
FIRE IMPACT FEE FUND 8,263 248 8,015
RECREATION IMPACT FEE 16,175 180,000 (163,825)
DEBT SERVICE FUND 911,370 911,370 0
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 531,821 531,821 0
WATER AND SEWER FUND 9,833,639 9,702,974 130,665
WATER DEVELOPMENT FEES 110,000 707,566 (597,566)
SEWER DEVELOPMENT FEES 115,000 648,243 (533,243)
RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT 360 ,000 360,000 0
REFUSE FUND 2,481,000 2,505,872 (24,872)
STORM WATER FUND 1,235,935 1,222,703 13,232
ANIMAL SERVICES FUND 711,120 721,403 (10,283)
TOTAL ALL FUNDS 30,256,169 30,796,951
GENERAL FUND DESCRIPTION
• The General Fund accounts for all
resources that are not required to be
accounted for in other funds; in
essence it accounts for all unrestricted
resources.
• Page 4 of proposed budget.
5
GENERAL FUND
REVENUE BY SOURCE
INTERGOVERN CHARGES FOR
MENTAL SERVICES FINES
REVENUE 3% FORFEITS
15% 1%
MISC.
LICENSES AND REVENUE
PERMITS ' 10%
2% OTHER
x�'rF SOURCES
TAXES
65%
Page 5 of budget
GENERAL FUND
EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT
CITY COUNCIL
LEISURE SERVICES 1% CRY MANAGER
OPERATIONS 3%
7% CRY CLERK
LEISURE SERVICES 2 %
ADMINISTRATION
3% FINANCE
5%
STREETS PLANING
3% 3%
BUILDING
COMMUNITY SERVICES
2%
(CODE ENFORCEMENT )
2% ^.. y m� �, PERSONNEL
FIRE OPERATIONS 4 (VAIN"'
OTHER GOV.
SERVICES
20%
FIRE ADMINISTRATION
3%
POLICE
POLICE OPERATIONS ADMINISTRATION
22% 4%
Page 6 of budget
6
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
AS OF
SEPTEMBER 7, 2007
1. General Employee Pension Plan — Pursuant to State Statute Ch. 112.61
Legislative Intent " Accordingly, except as herein provided, it is the intent of this
act to prohibit the use of any procedure, methodology, or assumptions the effect
of which is to transfer to future tax payers any portion of the costs which may
reasonably have been expected to be paid by the current taxpayers."
September 5, 2007 — Charles Slavin, Actuary for the State of Florida Division of
Retirement confirms that under funding is in direct conflict with 112.61.
September 6, 2007 — Carolyn Ansay, City Attorney reviews Ch. 112 and looks at
cases and Attorney General Opinions, and confirms that any actions that would
shift costs from current to future taxpayers would be prohibited.
September 6, 2007 — Lee Dehner, Attorney for General Employee Pension Plan
confirms his conversation with Mr. Slavin and agrees that the decision to under
fund is prohibited.
FY 2008 Budget to reflect requirement to fund at 48.25% of payroll or
$1,222,0000.
Mr. Dehner and Staff suggest directing Principal Financial Group to come up with
modifications to the plan that would ensure:
• Long Term Sustainability of the Plan
• Acceptable Level of Funding (i.e. 21% of payroll or 600,000)
• Modifications are in accordance with State Statute Ch.112 and
approved by Mr. Slavin.
2. Collective Bargaining Agreements — All contracts are currently being negotiated,
the FOP agreement went for ratification on August 27, 2007, and failed by 28
(No) and 5 (yes). The table below identifies major articles of economic substance
only:
FY 2008 Budget reflects a 3% wage adjustment, City to absorb an overall
increase in medical insurance of 5.4% and no appropriations for Vacation and
Sick Cash in.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES CONTINUED
Article City PEA FOP
CPI as of April 2007
Wages '3% 5.80% 8% 2.5%
Status Estimated Cost for
Sick Cash In Not permitted Status Quo Quo FY2008
Vacation Status
Cash In 1 Week Status Quo Quo $350,000 City Wide.
Language addressing Excessive Status
Sick Time Usage Status Quo Quo
Vacation Language requiring advanced Status
Time notice Status Quo Quo
Pay Dependent Coverage for Employees Status
Insurance Status Quo hired after 2004. Quo
Pay Cycle Bi- Weekly Status Quo
Remove Presidents Day add Status
Holiday Floating Holiday Accepts Quo
3. Insurance (Property, Casualty, W /C) quotes were received September 6, 2007.
Net Increase $70,354. FY 2008 Budget to reflect increased cost.
Bottom Line
In light of the uncertainty of successful modifications to the pension plan, negotiating
collective bargaining agreements and increased costs associated with insurance, Staff
recommends that Council adopt a millage rate of 5.20/1,000 of taxable value.
This is necessary to maintain our existing service levels without a major reduction in
workforce. This rate will generate enough excess revenue in the general fund that will be
necessary to assist the enterprise funds in balancing (see below). Overall, the proposed
budget falls short in its ability to generate enough excess cash for reserves and emerging
capital needs, which equates to a recipe for failure.
General Fund Water & Sewer Refuse Stormwater Total
Revenue $ 13,641,595.00 $ 9,833,639.00 $ 2,481,000.00 $ 1,235,935.00 $ 27,192,169.00
Expense $(13,206,819.00) $(10,046,657.00) $(2,593,400.00) $(1,284,756.00) $(27,131,632.00)
Net $ 434,776.00 $ (213,018.00) $ (112,400.00) $ (48,821.00) $ 60,537.00 0.22%
If the City successfully modifies the pension plan, and ratifies the collective bargaining
agreements (pursuant to Council direction) and entertains a rate increase within the
enterprise funds, we will proactively begin to address our cash reserves and emerging
capital needs.