10-14-2005 - Workshop CITY COUNCIL OF EDGEWATER
WORKSHOP
OCTOBER 14, 2005
10:00 A.M.
NEW SMYRNA BEACH /EDGEWATER CAMPUS
DAYTONA BEACH COMMUNITY COLLEGE
MINUTES
WELCOME, INTRODUCTION OF ATTENDEES AND FACILITATOR MARILYN
CROTTY - STEVE DENNIS
Steve Dennis, Executive Vice President of the Southeast
Volusia Chamber of Commerce introduced himself. They have
taken the opportunity to try to put the cities together to
address a number of critical issues in our area that they
believe they should be able to talk face to face on.
The following participants introduced themselves; Bruce
Mowry, Executive Director of the Water Authority of
Volusia, Pat Card, City of Edgewater Planning & Zoning
Board; Oscar Zeller, City of Edgewater Economic Development
Board; Bob Lott, Chairman of the City of Edgewater Economic
Development Board; Chris Balmer of the City of Edgewater
Economic Development Board; Susan Wadsworth, City of
Edgewater City Clerk; Darren Lear, City of Edgewater
Director of Development Services; Kenneth Hooper, City of
Edgewater City Manager; Judy Lichter, Vice Mayor of the
City of Edgewater; Jim Brown, Edgewater City Council;
Harriet Rhodes, Edgewater City Council; Jim Vandergrifft,
City of New Smyrna Beach Mayor; Lynne Plaskett, New Smyrna
Beach City Commission; Shannon Lewis, Business Development
Director, City of New Smyrna Beach and Edgewater for
governmental affairs; Frank Roberts, City of New Smyrna
Beach City Manager; Bill Rogers, New Smyrna Beach City
Commission; Bob Rodi, General Manager Chief Executive
Officer of the Utilities Commission; George Steindoerfer,
Port Orange City Council; Cindy Downs, New Smyrna Beach;
Jim Russell, New Smyrna Beach citizen; Montye Beamer,
Volusia County Growth Management Commission; and Doris
Massey.
Mr. Dennis went over the agenda for the day.
Terry Roberts, General Manager of New Smyrna Beach
Speedway, told the audience of future events coming up.
1
Summit of the Cities
October 14, 2005
Mr. Dennis also informed the audience that Mr. Roberts also
serves as Chairman of the Southeast Volusia Advertising
Committee.
A representative from New Smyrna Beach expressed his
appreciation for what the cities of Port Orange and
Edgewater do for them.
Mr. Dennis explained they contacted all the cities to come
up with some topics. He asked all the cities to offer
something they would like to make a presentation on. They
decided to instead go with some topics in general.
TOPICS - FACILITATOR - MARILYN CROTTY
Mr. Dennis introduced Marilyn Cross, Director, Institute of
Government, University of Central Florida.
Ms. Crotty feels by coming together to talk about some
common needs, common interests and ways they might interact
with each other will really benefit everyone. She stated
intergovernmental coordination and cooperation is kind of a
buzzword that is used all the time and it is written into
lots of legislature and it is the hardest thing to have it
actually happen in her experience of observing. She
presented an example of how this is working in a community
near here that she has been privileged to participate in.
She stated for the last four or five years they have set up
quarterly intergovernmental meetings. They build a common
agenda for each meeting of things that are of interest and
concern to all the jurisdictions and then they actually do
something. They have a joint legislative agenda that they
put together and they jointly fund a lobbyist to work on
those issues that they all agree are priorities for the
County and they have been able to make something happen by
banding together.
Ms. Crotty wanted the group to establish some guidelines
for the day that would make it a really productive time.
She asked them to talk about what they would like to
accomplish.
Mr. Roberts commented on the City Managers getting together
to discuss the possibility of identifying areas where they
are coming together, where the cities are growing together
and where their boundaries are going to touch and ways to
2
Summit of the Cities
October 14, 2005
be able to provide compatible land uses and development
patterns and also the issue of transportation. He
commented on items the cities are involved in together such
as the Regional Communication.
Councilwoman Lichter stated it would be very helpful when
they get past the presentation of Smart Growth if the two
maps could have some identification like main avenues and
main streets. It is hard to not only work with two cities
but to try to figure out when you've got a planning issue
where the open space, green space and large farm areas are.
Mr. Card stated he would like to hear a little bit about
how in Smart Growth and especially when they are doing the
clustering, how they bring communities together. How do
you build a community where there is no community involved?
You are saying in Smart Growth to have everything in
walking distance like small towns. When small towns were
originated they had cultural bonds with one another in a
small town, which was part of what made them work. He
would like to see whether they have looked at that and how
that is going to be encouraged.
Councilwoman Lichter feels they have to talk about
cooperatively evacuation centers. There has to be some
more discussion about this even in terms of what happens on
the other side of I -95 with these big places might they be
able to accommodate. What can our citizens here do?
A representative of New Smyrna Beach commented on
discussion regarding the new New Smyrna Beach High School
being an evacuation center.
VOLUSIA SMART GROWTH IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE FINAL REPORT
OVERVIEW - GLENN STORCH
Ms. Crotty introduced Attorney Glenn Starch, who was
appointed by the County Council to serve on the Volusia
Smart Growth Implementation Committee. She commented on
the other representatives that served on the Committee.
Attorney Storch is now serving on the Volusia Charter
Commission also.
Attorney Glenn Storch, law firm of Storch & Morris, spoke
on Clay Henderson going to various cities and giving a more
formal presentation. He is hoping that they have some
3
Summit of the Cities
October 14, 2005
discussions and he will give them some rough ideas of what
happened, how they got to this point and what the main
ideas are they will be discussing.
Attorney Storch presented a history of how Smart Growth
came about. He stated when the first group got together
there were a number of different views among the people as
to how to deal with these growth issues and the Smart
Growth issues especially. He commented on having almost a
unanimous vote that said this was something they needed.
He further commented on the Committee determining what
their goal was of Smart Growth. He stated growth will be
here and they have to learn how to deal with that. He
spoke of looking at it as it is right now, what is it they
want to preserve especially from an environmental
standpoint. He referred to Map A, which showed areas that
were extremely important to preserve. He then commented on
how they get to the point where they can actually preserve
these areas. He spoke of clustering and preserving large
areas of green space.
Attorney Storch then commented on Map B, which are large
areas they would like to find a way of preserving our
quality of life but they aren't as critical as Map A.
Attorney Storch then spoke about encouraging preservation.
Attorney Storch spoke about how to minimize and resolve
disputes between the County and the cities or cities and
cities. He mentioned providing water and sewer to
clustered areas but not providing it to other areas.
Attorney Storch spoke on encouraging areas of influence
with regard to areas each City would service. From an
environmental standpoint far better. From a resource
standpoint far better. Once they have these areas
negotiated out they have no reason to play games. He
commented on utility service being a moneymaker. He spoke
of encouraging urban service areas. He further explained
in the Smart Growth recommendations there are primary and
secondary service areas.
Attorney Storch commented on dealing with annexation
issues. He spoke of reconstituting the Growth Management
Commission into a different form. The bottom line is what
do you want to put in its place. He spoke of having an
4
Summit of the Cities
October 14, 2005
arbitration board, which is made up of three County
Councilmen, three members of VCOG and one School Board
member. He then spoke about how to implement the
recommendations. Many of these recommendations can only be
done by Charter Amendment.
Attorney Storch spoke of much growth coming in and needing
to plan for this growth.
Ms. Plaskett asked if the Committee discussed densities in
different cities. Ms. Crotty mentioned they all need to
agree on the future development of that area whether it be
in the cities or the County of what it should look like and
they develop it doing planning agreements. In order to
change it, all of those governments would have to agree to
it. Attorney Storch mentioned looking at densities,
architectural standards and gateway standards.
A gentleman in the audience commented on liking the
clustering concept but unfortunately in Florida there's a
lot of wetlands.
Councilman Brown commented on trying to do clustering in
Edgewater and it being difficult to get the people to
accept the houses so close together. He feels there needs
to be more education informing the public why they are
doing this. Attorney Storch commented on the market
supporting it. He spoke of the large green areas around
clustered areas.
Mr. Card feels clustering creates enclaves and people don't
feel a part of the community. It changes the culture of
your community. Attorney Storch spoke of methods to
preserve in the rural areas.
Mr. Card spoke of Turnbull Hammock being preserved and
developing enclaves and how to govern that.
There was a discussion regarding how Deltona was developed
and when Edgewater Landing was first put in.
Councilwoman Lichter spoke of not being able to build on
wetlands. Attorney Storch informed her they could build on
wetlands if it is permitted. What they want to do is
discourage and the permitting process presently does
5
Summit of the Cities
October 14, 2005
discourage that. He mentioned having an incentive to make
people to go through the process of Smart Growth.
A gentlemen expressed concern regarding homeowner's
associations having authority to control individuals verses
control of local government. Another gentleman expressed
concern over a homeowner's coalition being a nightmare and
the group consisting of volunteers trying to run
everything. They have good intentions but when they have
residents that want to do what they want, these people
argue in faith and take the abuse. He commented on then
other people not wanting to serve on the Board. Attorney
Storch commented on having to have a homeowner's
association.
Councilwoman Lichter spoke of moving to Edgewater and
feeling like there were three divisions; the retirement
developments, Florida Shores and Riverside Drive. One of
her goals has been to pull this together and show them the
common denominator but all cities have that.
Mr. Lott commented on having a vision of what they would
like to achieve. He spoke of talking a lot about
clustering but wanted to speak about the transfer of
development rights. He asked Attorney Storch to speak
about the mechanics of transfer of development rights and
how it facilitates clustering, which he did at this time.
Ms. Crotty commented on this being a tough issue all over
the State of Florida. She spoke of this being an issue
that won't go away that is only going to get worse and
something that everyone in the County is going to have to
address.
There was a brief discussion on incentives related to
workforce housing. Ms. Crotty then commented on densities.
Attorney Storch commented on the issue of education and
educating the children being a major issue. He presented
examples of being in better shape than any area around
Florida.
Ms. Crotty commented on the Smyrna mode of traffic being an
ongoing conversation in Volusia County and particularly if
the Charter Commission picks up on any of these issues and
puts them on the ballot. She suggested the Councils' and
County when designing their work schedules look closely at
6
Summit of the Cities
October 14, 2005
these and how they might impact their city. What they like
about it or what they don't think looks right. The cities
can either get behind it or try to modify the things they
think might be problematic for them but she feels they need
to be players and get involved and really understand what
the effort is all about.
Ms. Crotty was interested in their reactions to the ideas
about the primary setting out of these urban service areas
and only having one provider and negotiating agreements for
areas that butt up against each other and then sticking
with them because jurisdiction is bound by that agreement
and they can't make any changes unless all parties agree to
it.
City Manager Hooper felt in the three cities represented at
the meeting that it was in place and was increasingly
working well.
Councilwoman Lichter commented on having the Middle School
and High School in common as well as the College and this
being a unified factor. She also commented on having the
river in common.
TRANSPORTATION
Ms. Crotty wanted to move into discussion regarding
Transportation. She asked what the issue was in play and
she wanted them to focus on what they could do
cooperatively to try to deal with the issues.
City Manager Roberts referred to the Transportation Study.
He spoke of New Smyrna Beach being in the process of
putting it all together. He felt it would be finished by
the end of next week and would go out to see if they could
get some qualified companies to take a look at it. They
have completed the policies, goals that have been adopted
by the three cities. That would need to come back
together.
Ms. Crotty made mention of New Smyrna Beach being in the
process of putting together the RFQ and that would go out
for bid and jointly they would do the selection. The goal
was to have the study completed by August 2006. It would
then come before the local government for approval and
funding. City Manager Hooper explained part of the study
7
Summit of the Cities
October 14, 2005
was to have the consultant come up with a fair share
portion of payment, something besides just the impact fees
that were there now and have been that divided amongst the
residents. He spoke of New Smyrna taking the lead and the
other cities participating at this point on making sure it
is for the whole region.
Commissioner Rogers asked if the study focused primarily on
roads. City Manager Hooper informed her it did.
Councilwoman Rogers pointed out that most growth was a
result of development.
City Manager Roberts commented on the funding issue as far
as the cities were concerned. He further commented on
needing a traffic signal on State Road 44. They may
recognize that is needed but that doesn't necessarily mean
it would be provided.
City Manager Parker commented on having a special
assessment to build roads. So far the development
community said they liked the idea. He felt it was real
clear that transportation had always been one of the items.
He spoke of having a methodology and then looking at
various funding options that were available to them to
accomplish those job tasks. He made mention of this being
the first multijurisdictional effort that is not only
looking at planning where the corridors need to be but also
looking at how they fund those improvements across a
multijurisdictional boundary.
Mayor Schmidt asked if they had an update on how the east
beltway stood and what the progress was in New Smyrna and
the County with regard to the path of that road. It is a
topic that keeps coming up because people want to be able
to move from our City to Daytona and things like that but
trying to get there with having U.S. #1 in essence doesn't
really work.
Mr. Dennis confirmed Mayor Schmidt was talking about the
Williamson Boulevard extension.
There was a brief discussion regarding the alignment of the
Williamson Boulevard extension. Councilwoman Lichter
confirmed this would be part of the study. Mr. Dennis
informed her it was part of the whole package. He spoke of
8
Summit of the Cities
October 14, 2005
there being three options for the alignment when it was
originally brought to them.
Mention was made of the Airport Road extension.
Councilwoman Lichter commented on needing an east -west
group transportation that could get residents to areas such
as Deland and Orlando.
Mr. Dennis pointed out they could take a bus to Deland but
they better have a lot of time to do it.
Ms. Crotty asked if anyone had any input or comment on
additional mass transit plans or proposals or needs.
Commissioner Plaskett commented on 10 Street and Myrtle
Avenue and the new High School being open before the road
was built. She further commented on the impact of the
traffic on 10 Street. She spoke of the County purchasing
additional property to put in additional stormwater. She
felt there needed to be better coordination.
City Manager Roberts commented on New Smyrna as well as the
other cities trying to sit with the school system as
development occurs to identify school sites and have them
take a look at it and agree to the location and preserve
it. He commented on getting pre -site approval as
development occurs.
City Manager Hooper commented on the School Board being
exempt from concurrency. He spoke of the middle piece of
10 Street being developed when they don't have the two
ends connected to another major road that won't be
developed for a few more years. That part of the system
gets corrected in future years.
Mr. Card commented on if the middle school goes in at Air
Park Road and SR 442 in Edgewater. He asked what was being
done to increase the availability of easy access to it. He
asked if SR 442 would be the only access. He asked if
anything was happening with this and if this was part of
the study.
City Manager Hooper stated they would be looking at either
expansions or new alignments for north - south, east -west
corridors.
9
Summit of the Cities
October 14, 2005
City Manager Roberts commented on doing the planning but
not doing the physical work of putting the roads in prior
to the development. The development comes and forces them
to put the roads in after the fact. They need to do it the
other way around. He spoke of putting a mechanism in
place.
Ms. Crotty asked if as part of the study there would be an
implementation strategy. City Manager Hooper informed her
there would probably be some funding. Right now most of
the road building is being done with impact fees, which
they don't receive until the development occurs. He then
spoke of Seminole County passing a 1 cent sales tax to
build roads in advance of the requirement to and this being
pretty rare. He spoke of a special assessment being one
way. They are asking the consultant to list other fair
share and funding options.
Mention was made that it would take the cities and County
to force the State to pass implementation rules for funding
mechanisms to put the roads in in advance.
Mayor Vandergrifft referred to those that sat on the MPO
and commented on it not going in that direction but going
in the other direction based on legislation that happened
last year. They have less input and get less funding.
Mr. Card expressed concern with moving toward County and
State groups that control what is occurring. He spoke of
having less control over the last 10 years of the need for
this money at local levels. If they continue to shift this
control into higher level control of what occurs at the
local level, they have less control and people have less
input.
Ms. Crotty asked Mr. Card if he was talking about Smart
Growth, which he was. Ms. Crotty clarified that group was
a final resort and wasn't meant to replace any City or
County Council or any other in place local decision making
body. It was only when there was a conflict that could not
be resolved between two or more jurisdictions. She didn't
think it was meant to try to overtake or overrule.
Councilman Brown commented on the County having slated to
do half of Old Mission Road and when it was brought to
10
Summit of the Cities
October 14, 2005
their attention that by doing half of Old Mission Road and
not four landing the whole way at the same time they were
doing this, that cut off one more corridor for the people
picking up kids everywhere else. He spoke of funding being
taken from that and being put on 10 Street to get more of
it done instead of messing up Old Mission Road and 10
Street at the same time.
Ms. Crotty assumed there was a staff person within each
City who was in constant communication with the County, DOT
and the schools when they are developing in their community
in case an issue needs to be resolved.
Ms. Crotty commented on gas prices continuing to go up and
the need for more public transportation.
Mr. Dennis informed everyone lunch was ready.
Mr. Dennis introduced everyone to Rosemarie Kerche who was
Secretary Treasurer and was going to speak to everyone
about the "Relay for Life." On April 7 th and 8 th they were
having the Relay for Life at the Manatee Park on Riverside
Drive. Last year they raised $170,000 that went to
research. She had flyers to handout. She wanted to see
some of the cities compete and do a team within the City.
She also commented on their first kickoff meeting being
October 24 at the Coronado Civic Center.
The meeting recessed for lunch.
WAV RECAP - BRUCE MOWRY
Bruce Mowry, Executive Director for the Water Authority of
Volusia (WAV), commented on all of Volusia County pulling
all of its water from one aquifer, one source of water. He
spoke of discussion a number of years ago regarding there
being a finite amount of water that they could supply and
that demand was constantly being increased and that at some
point the ability to support the demand would come to an
end. They wanted to plan for the future by working
together.
Mr. Mowry commented on the St. Johns River Water Management
District being the regulator that issues the permits and
the keepers of the aquifer. He spoke of programs they have
11
Summit of the Cities
October 14, 2005
to monitor, manage, fund and give assistance. WAV is not
replacing that position.
Mr. Mowry commented on the miscommunication and the
misunderstanding of what WAV is and what their purpose is.
He commented on there being misunderstanding because of
prior organizations that had different missions. WAV's
mission is different than the previous organization, the
Volusian Water Alliance, which was a planning organization
that had no authority.
Mr. Mowry further commented on how WAV was created. Of the
16 cities in Volusia County, 13 cities as well as the
County joined WAV. It represented 98% of all the water
used by the public utility supply, which pump about 50% of
all of the water being produced out of the aquifer compared
to agriculture, industrial, commercial and individual
wells. WAV was also limited to the point of saying they
shall only be responsible to supply future water and that
everything they presently had today was protected. He made
mention of WAV having the authority to purchase
infrastructure only if it is offered to them. He referred
to the interlocal agreement which defined the restrictions
and limitations, which was available on WAV's website.
Mr. Mowry then commented on handout he passed out regarding
the Strategic Plan 2004, which identified the Vision, the
Mission, the Goals and the Strategies.
Mr. Mowry explained in the interlocal agreement it had a
requirement that within the first two years of the
organization being created, February 19, 2004, they are
required to have a Master Facility Plan.
Mr. Mowry then identified some of the outcomes and issues
they were talking about and some of the things they were
developing with regard to their Goals - Planning,
Providing, and Preserving.
Mr. Mowry further commented on the Master Facility Plan,
which is over a million dollar study. They are getting
about a million dollars from the State and are only having
to match 25 %. CDM, Camp, Dresser and McKee were selected
to do the study.
12
Summit of the Cities
October 14, 2005
Mr. Mowry then identified what should be included in a
Master Facility Plan. He encouraged the different cities
to speak to their representatives on the WAV Board,
Councilwoman Lichter, Mayor Vandergrifft and Councilman
Steindoerfer.
Mr. Mowry stated he does not make policy. He educates the
Board, informs the Board and tells the Board the options.
The representatives of the cities on the Board vote to
create policy. When policies are created, he implements
them.
Mr. Mowry commented on having above average rainfall over
the last five years. He then identified where the existing
demands were. Growth has been occurring but because of the
rain they haven't really recognized demand.
Mr. Mowry then commented on the Consumptive Use Permit
(CUP) which says how much groundwater the cities can
withdraw. CUP's can also apply to surface water and other
supplies. He estimated if they look at their CUP's and
don't get any more capacity but they are maintaining their
CUP's then around 2015 countywide they will run short of
water.
Mr. Mowry then commented on the Water Supply Plan being
done by the Water Management District in Palatka showing
that in 2025 Volusia County will be 25 million gallons per
day short.
Mr. Mowry then commented on the flow and water level at
Blue Springs. He further commented on the CUP's in Volusia
County being reduced. All of the wellfields will be
reduced because of Volusia County sharing the same aquifer.
Mr. Mowry further commented on not being able to predict
growth and anticipated demand in the future.
Mr. Mowry then spoke about portfolios.
Mr. Mowry commented on looking at trying to get the maximum
out of their present sources of water, the fresh water
aquifer, by taking care of it better by managing the water
levels, by recharging it and trying to offset demands with
recycled water. Right now there is $87 million in Volusia
13
Summit of the Cities
October 14, 2005
County set aside just to do what they presently have to
keep what they have permitted.
Mr. Mowry elaborated on four portfolios with regard to
alternative water supply.
Mr. Mowry pointed out there was more water flowing out of
Blue Springs than all the water being produced, which is
only one spring in this whole county. One environmental
demand exceeds all of our demands.
Mr. Mowry identified the total cost for Portfolio 2,
Portfolio 6, Portfolio 8 and Portfolio 9.
Mr. Mowry then identified the cost per 1,000 gallons for
water to be delivered with regard to the portfolios and
surface water, supply water.
Mr. Mowry commented on why the WAV Board selected Portfolio
8 as a direction given to the consultant to develop.
Mr. Mowry then elaborated on the Water Resource Charging
Area.
Mr. Mowry spoke about new minimum levels being set on four
lakes in Volusia County. He felt Edgewater would be
impacted but Port Orange or New Smyrna wouldn't due to
their wells not being close enough to the lake. He made
mention that the impact could change some of WAV's
philosophies of what they are going to do.
Mr. Card asked Mr. Mowry to help him understand the
difference between shallow well impacts and deep well
impacts which Mr. Mowry explained at this time.
There was a brief discussion regarding artesian wells and
St. Johns having an artesian well capping program.
There was also a discussion regarding salt water intrusion
into the aquifer. Mr. Mowry spoke of the long time it
takes to clean up an aquifer. He referred to what was
happening in California and Tampa.
A gentleman suggested in order to save the aquifer they
could limit growth. Mr. Mowry referred to a situation in
14
Summit of the Cities
October 14, 2005
Santa Barbara with regard to how growth affected their
water supply.
Mr. Mowry commented on living in California and land now
being sold out there for $1 million an acre. He briefly
commented on smart growth and clustering of homes.
Mr. Mowry commented on WAV not making any decisions on
growth. They are a utility and treat all of their members
equally and fairly. He further spoke of WAV not being a
perfect organization. He spoke of enforcing the policy of
the WAV Board.
There was a discussion regarding one of the WAV members,
Daytona Beach, feeling they should be able to do a larger
control because they are one of the larger members. Mr.
Mowry spoke of having three big members that control 46% of
the revenue of WAV on the present assessment. He made
mention of as little as 25% of the vote blocking any action
of WAV. He spoke of anybody having the ability to veto any
action of WAV.
There was then a discussion regarding the location of the
eastern brackish water plant and brackish water plants not
having to be on the waterfront.
A brief discussion ensued regarding how deep they have to
dig for a brackish plant.
Ms. Crotty asked if there were any other particular water
issues that they thought could be discussed amongst the
four governments that they needed to work together on.
Councilwoman Lichter made mention of conservation. She
spoke of working with Deborah Green on conservation issues
before Mr. Mowry came on board. No matter how much they do
and what they do with conservation they will still have
this problem. She commented on standards set by the County
with regard to watering restrictions. She felt enforcement
was an issue that needed to be worked on.
There was then a discussion regarding what would happen if
WAV wasn't able to fulfill their obligation to the cities
with regard to alternative water sources. Mr. Mowry
explained if a city needed to build a plant immediately and
WAV couldn't fulfill that requirement, the city would be
15
Summit of the Cities
October 14, 2005
allowed to do it with the understanding WAV would reimburse
them and it would become a WAV facility in the future.
Mr. Mowry commented on one of the big problems he runs into
with WAV being they have no track record with regard to
producing water. They have no credibility and no utility.
There were questions asked regarding a meeting that was
held last night with regard to power plants and other
technology with regard to producing water.
Mr. Card asked if the Miami Corporation had a current
license for water production of significance. Mr. Mowry
informed him they didn't have a CUP for water production.
They set up a private utility through the PUC but they do
not have a CUP. They can only get a CUP if they show a
need or a demand.
Ms. Crotty referred to a list of the things that were
identified in the beginning that they wanted to talk about
today. She mentioned evacuation centers.
Councilwoman Lichter commented on Edgewater taking in land
on the west side of I -95 and a developer providing the land
to build an evacuation center.
Mayor Vandergrifft mentioned a portion of the high school
being used as an evacuation center and the additional
funding that was needed.
Mayor Vandergrifft referred to ACLF's. He also commented
on big subdivisions that have clubhouses making their
clubhouses evacuation centers. He spoke of keeping people
off the roads in an evacuation.
City Manager Roberts commented on an evacuation center
being out of the 100 year floodplain and the roadway being
accessible at all times. He spoke of requiring the
clubhouses to service themselves to have food and bedding
if it was going to be an emergency facility.
City Manager Parker commented on having their first one
come in that had made their clubhouse an evacuation center.
Councilman Brown felt they also needed to look at
evacuation routes and pushing for more east west roads to
16
Summit of the Cities
October 14, 2005
get them out of here. In our area, they have SR 44 and
that is it. He mentioned extending SR 442 out to SR 415 to
get people out of the area.
Councilwoman Lichter mentioned living in a manufactured
home and having to evacuate before everyone else. She
mentioned Maytown Road being an option. She felt SR 442
would be extended further west than I -95 once the
development goes in there but it wouldn't go all the way to
SR 415.
Ms. Crotty asked City Manager Hooper if they were looking
at evacuation routes as part of the transportation plan
they were doing and putting dollar figures on the
enhancements they need. City Manager Hooper informed her
not in this one they were talking about. He felt it was a
response to development growth. Ms. Crotty mentioned
adding something to the study and if it had any merit.
Councilman Brown stated he didn't know that they had any
plans for school buses or anything to be used for those
that don't have transportation.
City Manager Parker mentioned the Volusia Plan did and that
Votran and school buses are an integral part of it.
Councilman Brown felt they needed to get the information to
more people so they know it is available.
Councilwoman Lichter stated they weren't just talking
hurricanes and referred to the wildfires in 1998. She
spoke of new people that had moved in not knowing where SR
442 was. She felt education and communication was one of
their problems.
Ms. Crotty mentioned Oak Hill being invited but not being
present at the meeting. She asked each of the three cities
present if there was anything they were currently engaged
in, working on, or thinking about that could be enhanced,
improved, made better or easier, if they had some
cooperation, coordination or assistance from one of their
sister cities in the room.
Commissioner Rogers felt in the overall socket of things,
the four cities cooperated very well together.
17
Summit of the Cities
October 14, 2005
City Manager Roberts mentioned utilities being an issue.
Ms. Crotty asked if he was talking about water or sewer.
City Manager Roberts said yes. Mayor Vandergrifft
mentioned specifically reclaimed water and always wanting
to get all of the reclaimed water out of the river. He
mentioned having an interconnect between Port Orange and
Edgewater to share with each city to eliminate dumping the
reclaimed water into the river.
Mention was made of putting the reclaimed water back into
the recharge area and funding being an issue.
Mayor Schmidt commented on Edgewater spending $3 million on
storage tanks in the last couple of years and trying to get
the system better without really having an adequate supply
of water.
Ms. Crotty suggested the three City Managers get together
and discuss the feasibility of an interconnect for the
reclaimed water.
City Manager Parker made mention of stormwater issues and
regional parks.
City Manager Roberts commented on fire hydrants.
Councilwoman Lichter thought sometimes in terms of
recreation that the ones that give out grants don't
encourage cities working together and want them to go their
separate way. She spoke of the shuffleboard courts they
wanted to share with New Smyrna Beach if they would have
gotten the money from FEMA. They couldn't get it done that
way. She felt that was so with other types of grants as
well.
Councilman Brown commented on trying to figure out a way
for the last five years to protect the islands adjacent to
Edgewater and get them under some kind of control.
Mention was then made about a much needed interchange at
Pioneer Trail.
Mention was then made of cities providing cable service.
18
Summit of the Cities
October 14, 2005
Ms. Crotty stressed to the cities about cooperating because
individually it may not be as feasible as if they could do
something together.
Ms. Crotty mentioned they were going to make some
commitments or agreements that something would happen as a
result of meeting today. She suggested the County be
invited to another meeting of the group.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to discuss, the Summit of
the Cities meeting adjourned.
Minutes submitted by:
Lisa Bloomer, CMC
Deputy City Clerk
City of Edgewater
19
Summit of the Cities
October 14, 2005