The URL can be used to link to this page

2011-O-01 +... ORDINANCE NO. 2011 -0 -01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDGEWATER AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -0 -04 AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION, HOLDING PUBLIC HEARINGS, TRANSMITTING THIS ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND ANY OTHER UNIT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT OR GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY THAT HAS REQUESTED A COPY OF THE PLAN AMENDMENT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, from time to time it becomes necessary to amend the City of Edgewater Comprehensive Plan, and WHEREAS, the laws of Florida require the City to update the Capital Improvements Element annually. WHEREAS, the existing Capital Improvements Element includes a 5 -year schedule of projects that must be updated to reflect the City's current 5 -year plan, and WHEREAS, the subject amendments related to the annual CIE update are exempt from the twice per year limitation on the adoption of Comprehensive Plan amendments pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes; WHEREAS, such amendments are permitted subject to the provisions of Chapter 163, F.S. and Rule 9J -11, F.A.C. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board, sitting as the City's Local Planning Agency, held an advertised Public Hearing pursuant to 163.3164(18) & 163.3174(4) (a), Fla. Stat. (2006), on Wednesday, November 11, 2009 on the proposed Plan Amendment and Struek- through passages are deleted. 1 Underlined passages are added. #2011 -0 -01 following that Public Hetorng voted and recommended that the'N'ity Council approve the aforesaid Amendment to the City's 2003 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby declares that the purpose and intent of the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is to guide future growth and development; encourage the best use of land, water and other resources to promote and protect the general welfare of the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDGEWATER, FLORIDA: PART A. AMENDMENT. Amending the Capital Improvements Element hereby described in Exhibit "A ". PART B. PUBLICATION. Notice of this proposed change of the Edgewater Comprehensive Plan shall be published in the manner prescribed by 163.3184 (15) (c), Fla. Stat. (2006). The required advertisement shall be no less than two columns wide by TEN inches (10 ") long in a standard -size or tabloid - size newspaper, and the headline in the advertisement shall be no smaller than EIGHTEEN (18) point. The advertisement shall not be placed in a portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. The advertisement shall be placed in a newspaper of general paid circulation in the City of Edgewater, and of general interest and readership in the municipality, not one of limited subject matter, pursuant to Chapter 50 of the Florida Statutes. Whenever possible, the advertisement shall appear in the newspaper that is published at least FIVE (5) days a week, unless the only newspaper in the municipality is published less than FIVE (5) days a week. 163.3184 (15) (c) 2.b., Fla. Stat. (2006). The advertisement shall substantially be in the following form: S~^ eugh passages are deleted. 2 Underlined passages are added. #2011 -0 -01 Now aid Notice of Comprehensive Plan Amendment The City of Edgewater proposes to adopt the following ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 2009 -0 -08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDGEWATER AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -0 -04 AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION, HOLDING PUBLIC HEARINGS, TRANSMITTING THIS ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND ANY OTHER UNIT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT OR GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY THAT HAS REQUESTED A COPY OF THE PLAN AMENDMENT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. A public hearing on the ordinance changing the Comprehensive Plan will be held on November 16, 2009 at 6:00 p.m. at the Community Center, 102 N. Riverside Drive, Edgewater, Florida 32132. PART C. PUBLIC HEARINGS. As a condition precedent to the adoption of this ordinance amending the City's 2003 Comprehensive Plan, the City Council shall hold at least two advertised public hearings on the proposed comprehensive plan or plan amendment as follows: The first public hearing shall be held at the transmittal stage pursuant to subsection 163.3184 (15) (b), Fla. Stat. It shall be held on a weekday at least 7 days after the day that the first advertisement is published. The second public hearing shall be held at the adoption stage. It shall be held on a weekday at least 5 days after the day that the second advertisement is published. 163.3184, Fla. Stat. (2006). The Adoption Hearing shall be held within 120 days of the Department of Community Affairs having Struck rough passages are deleted. 3 Underlined passages are added. #2011 -0 -01 NNW '4600° issued its Objections, Comments, and Recommendations Report to the City. PART D. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts thereof that are in conflict with this ordinance, are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART E. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall become effective upon its final adoption and as provided by general law. PART F. SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provisions thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. PART G. ADOPTION. After a motion by Councilman Cooper with second by Councilman Ignasiak, the vote on the first reading of this ordinance held on January 10, 2011 is as follows: AYE NAY Mayor Mike Thomas X Councilman Justin A. Kennedy X Councilwoman Gigi Bennington ABSENT Councilman Mike Ignasiak X Councilman Ted Cooper X Stfitek-tlir-eugh passages are deleted. 4 Underlined passages are added. #2011 -0 -01 0 After a motion by 0nnne;im,, n Cnnp r With second by('f wilnr , 14,,,,.;,,v , the vote on the second reading/public hearing of this ordinance held on. runt" -/ ' 2011 is as follows: AYE NAY Mayor Mike Thomas Councilman Justin A. Kennedy _L Councilwoman Gigi Bennington x Councilman Mike Ignasiak x Councilman Ted Cooper x_ PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 7th day of February, 2011. ATTEST: Bonnie Wenzel City Cleri,-# ( yf' !to C For the use and'reliance only by the City of Edgewater, Florida Approved as to form and legality by: Carolyn S. Ansay, Esquire City Attorney Doran, Sims, Wolfe, Ansay & Kundid Strnek-Haeugh passages are deleted. Underlined passages are added. #2011-0-01 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDGEWATER, FLORIDA By: 1 " e Thoma or Robin E. Matusick Paralegal Approved by the City Council of the City of Edgewater at a meeting held on this 7th day of Febuary, 2011 under Agenda Item No. 8 -- . gave Nine EXHIBIT A Struck through passages are deleted. 6 Underlined passages are added. #2011 -0 -01 `rre Nee CITY OF EDGEWATER PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD INFORMATION SUMMARY CASE # CPA -1003 APPLICANT /AGENT: City of Edgewater REQUESTED ACTION: Amend the Comprehensive Plan to update the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) and the accompanying Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Background The CIE identifies the capital improvements that are necessary for implementation of the Comprehensive Plan and ensure maintenance and achievement of Level of Service (LOS) standards for concurrency- related facilities, i.e. transportation, potable water, sanitary sewer, schools, recreation and open space, stormwater and solid waste. The Five -Year Capital Improvement Schedule must be financially feasible pursuant to the 2005 Growth Management Act (Senate Bill 360). Florida Statutes defines that financial feasibility means that sufficient revenues are currently available or will be available from committed funding sources for the first three (3) years, or will be available from committed or planned funding sources for years 4 and 5, of a 5 -year capital improvement schedule for financing capital improvements. Comprehensive Plan Consistency The amended CIE shall be submitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs and all required local regulatory agencies after adoption. Other Matters The CIE Amendment is exempt from the normal biannual Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends sending a favorable recommendation to City Council for the annual update and amendments to the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) and the accompanying Capital Improvements Program (CIP). MOTION Motion to send a favorable recommendation to City Council for the annual update and amendments to the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) and the accompanying Capital Improvements Program (CIP). G: \Planning and Zoning Board \Info Summaries\2010 \CPA -1003 - CIE.doc v CITY OF EDGEWATER, FL City of / fir ED CAPITAL IMPROVEME\T PROGRAM FY 2010-2011 TO 2014-2015 The Capital Improvement PrAmeam as set forth in this document is Pitng range planning tool for the City of Edgewater. The document reflects five years of capital outlay with the first year officially adopted as part of the fiscal year 2u09-2u1u 2010 -2011 budget by the City Council. The remaining years in the CIP serve as a planning guide, which is reviewed annually. The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) provides a planned and programmed approach to utilizing the City's financial resources in the most responsive and efficient manner to meet its service and facility needs. The CIP serves as a "blueprint" for the future of the community. Development of the CIP requires integration of financial, engineering, and planning functions. The CIP also incorporates needs identified in the Capital Improvements Element (CIE). The CIE fo- cuses on anticipated infrastructure requirements for six facility types required by the State of Flor- ida, Parks, Solid Waste, Stormwater, Transportation, Water, and Wastewater. The CIE focuses on service level standards and the land use plan adopted by the City Council in order to preclude deficiencies in adopted level of services. The CIP is developed to achieve the following results: * Consolidating and coordinating all department requests with the goal of reducing unnecessary delays and coordinating individual departments' improvement programs. * Establishing a system of procedures and priorities by which each proposal can be evaluated in terms of public need, the comprehensive planning of the area, and the interrelationships of projects and cost requirements. * Scheduling capital projects over an extended period so the most efficient financial plan for the CIP can be achieved. * Assuring that the 5 -year schedule of improvements for each type of facility is financially feasible. * Successfully implement level of service standards for public facilities as outlined in Florida Statutes Chapter 163, part of which states: Provide that public facilities and services meet or exceed the standards established in the Capital Improvements Element required by F.S. 1 63.3177 and are available when needed for the development, or that development orders and permits are conditioned on the availability of these public facilities and services necessary to serve the proposed development. Not later than one year after its due date established by the state land planning agency's rule for submission of local comprehensive plans pursuant to F.S. 163.3167(2), a local government shall not issue a development order or permit which results in a reduction in the level of services for the effected public facilities below the level of services provided in the comprehensive plan of the local government. • Table I City of Edgewater , Capital Improvement Schedule Fiscal Years Ending 2010. 2034 -2Ot1 -2015 1 r;.. 11',.,5 Proiecl 2t414.2t1141 2811.2011 2011.2112 2112.2013 2013.2114 22 - L! 5 Tutal (FINANCE D -P WTM -NT: MICA HVAr IJn,mde 16.019 • oyt.a1] C,.nw•il Chamh. t ILathnw.n R.nnvninn 61250 _ 62.21u r. rnr,n 1•re r 1ln rsc pad ' 116 2.126 f"oance-DenL.I4uah _ _ 1I61191.ao _ _ 3101.161.00 FIRE DEPARTMENT . 5-- 6 3 • 8••--- 21II.InJ 5• 146 I 5 - 5 4 1111* 2.5081 - , 1 l 311,1".111 -- .111041 Station 55 Replucement 211011.251 1 (V 4l 1V Fire Dept. Totals 5 5.350900 8•-- 30.000 8 32,000 1 000 $ 715,000 f 2,060,357 $ 2,060 ,357 PA6166496PA11TMEPfl ' VThiek-Rettlacernerit Felice - Dep mab 1 74.990 1 1- 811000 i 561000 1 6-- 5161000 1-- •83.000 1 411,990 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES: Veilir c- Prenlveemern 5--- 54 5--7; 5--620:14014 1 8 - -3503 ltl 283014 71,0u40 37.3,41141 Weinem-Stswele4.011-16-PornmStarinn -1-30;0110 144.1 *' 0000 • ,341113814 K Fi•V- 1441.lyl)Lenheeement -- b11016,0114 --3:000:044 W1CTP Imihlinr printing survey ;Towels 314.8011 314,81*) 23 MOs) nee Treatment Plant --- 110811;05 73111,11111 6.5•00,0011 4538*4304 14,14113110 SE Service MCA Reclaimed Impnwenmms S.ULMI,INMI 3,11110,01111 AmennritantreArr-T-IL -z : NN% ---1:1061404 wells 21.24 and sew• warcr maim 2,31411,41101 2 11)411410 2,310:41*0 r 4,6010841 AVLa - 1•,1141411. 40 • • .4010 141 iherimmtrielemrienweveniseevrienr 154%000 , `' 5 ^• 11 * ) NAV1N1 ---3e.:00.044 Wildman' St d ',sion/ - sliplinin0 - 311,91111 - 1 ,44;0440 240:010 - 1") 123,60 1250111 kltldesicrnrred-P wje_tr 350,014. _ - 1 L:L..•P..1 (1",11"3 FX1 k" Water bite Irishmen= 1110,1510 1101041 Reclaimed \Crater Pmirrt 1151.000 11411.4481 Rerluin, \Pert. Imnmvemrnt4 51.3544 511.111)41 CI'rwnne I'pinllUe 11011110 • 15111141 laI•'..Ll, ..h: 114(401 1111404 Slips y lrnrtl 'Ott 1001 2410411 L ift Stati., 1 Rehab. 15044141 ! n 1411414 Jrnpinerring .mat Inc color rtr DM "01*11I 2411)444 4 InfnresemPmirry 261 151 '61 151 Replacement of 2- Water Lines 503)151 54),3)4411 541,1101 91,4410 91,44111 241114111 Rrrl .nc,] \Ferro giro ftnen i,m+ _ 411110) 5111111 • 1219110 Pnrn Srarinq 4 11(1141*) 11411144 5l .lg.r hand nnerrrnrc pnwrr lull 741111111 75111011 Clumsier 3tlptinittratin g 175 7'4 175.7'S 10'6 pn,irrcepntuy ntry hid 4111 51111 410 4111 Bargemen atwl hra,hytrlp 1514011 '4111144 influent romp Stalin' 111114 *111 /1111111(1 Luau*( rrrrrlr perm >ht t 175 Intl 1751141 13111 Train N I .1r fi' ' 4110041 9111 111111 chlorine 91' ypd Alu,n l rr.1 11(111114 111111111 rVgiforrl RAS.1r W'.5 Pumping', 41511111 41514411 T7tir I Clarifier Ruddily. Mattson 1111.(131 films 1111154 11110111 {1'r. 1 '85 11111 '85 )410 (l.k,ratu.nal ro ngwmmnt 0, p.m Shirrs 17 751) 17 741 Pearl Strut Smrmweterin.pn. rmrnt Prnpgg 191111111 -- 131!{111 Ilan A,r,w,r ('IP Pn.i,+•r , 45%1101 64110111 imnont Sr Ar Riverside Dr. CIP Prnirr1 250.18111 '4144444 n .. ,, y.. s , a.,•,: •. 251410411 '54(MM) F T Ave. A. Rnrr.ulr Dr. CIP Pmierg 2S 251541 21 5111*) Environmental Services Totals 1-- 41692,373 41 58:450:0011 Fh4611:041U 526 3)141 1 1,688,903 8 1,430,000 f 2,044,225 f 17,655,000 39,075,000 f 31,893,128 LEISURE SERVICES: _ 8 -- - 5----31 5--- 1114411 5 5418151 8 228.1,41 Kenneth Park Rennnwnwmi IJIass 11 290,1411 290,1101 Doc Park 50,1410 511,1441 Aluaeo, Lake Park , 5481.1141 Raman Parks and Recreation Totals f - i-- 68:000 .---34h000 1' 1 ----50 S-11636400 S 840,000 f 840.000 PUBLIC WORKS: - Rand Repaving S -11•11111 5- 175,1851 • S 50I,I1110 S 56.0151 S 5441,10411 1 *1 5-- ;0117711+4 • 150,282 2.1511.282 SicneIisr SR442 a 1.95 287,546 287.546 3(k1s Street Sidewalk 157,716 1: 7,716 606,619 646.619 Indian River Blvd. Extension (*rune. 1 mild 4,604,160 41,14.1611 Public Works Totals 8-- 1021000 11---- 632,716 f 5,391,706 f 500.000 $ 500.000 , =OM 5-,126,132 If 756,901 f 7,648,607 A11 Projects Totals 1 •• •,869,563 1 141634,715 8 8 9,3851000 1"3075,000 *-451828,888 . 8 4,667,352 8 6,821,706 __3 3,334,225 $ 18,155,000 19,575,000 t 42,603,283 Source: City of Edgewater Ph • ig Division. 21111 IX -3 CAPI 1 /AL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES Fa-08 0 FY10 -11 FY11 -12 FY12 -13 FY13 -14 FY14 -15 FIVE YEARS General Fund $ 74,090 $ 502 ,000 $ .007,706 $-- 635 $-- 1754400 $ 6,301,606 Transfer from General Fund $150.282 $4.891,706 $50,000 $5.091.988 FRDAP Grant $790,000 $790.000 -DOT Cranl 157,716 167,716 Transfer from Grant Fund - DOT $454,966 $454,966 Transfer from Grant Fund - CBDG $96,615 $96,615 Transfer from Grant Fund - FEMA $1,141,357 $1,141,357 Transfer from Sidewalk Impact Fees $151,653 $151,653 Transfer from Fire Impact Fees $219,000 $219,000 Transfer from Debt Service $700,000 $700,000 Interest $1,355 $1,355 Prior Year Appropriations , 000 10 $63,221 $63,221 Local Option Gas Taxgs "x75, 500,000 500,000 500,000 1.075 500,000 2,000,000 General Fund Totals $ 176 - $ 4,113,166 $ 10,390,412 $ 1,976,000 $- 675400 $ 17,330,667 52.978,449 55,391,706 51.340,000 5500,000 5500,000 510,710,155 Water and Sewer Fund Transfer from Operating Revenues $ 204,006 $ 250400 $ 250,009 $ 250,000 $-- X00,000 $ 1,344,096 1.024.940 1.180.000 1.394.225 1.250.000 2.350.000 7.199.165 Transfer from Water Development -2452400 -3450,000 , 606 0 - 1,150,000 14 100,000 100,000 200,000 Transfer from Sewer Development 63,389 -2 ,822,822,` - 3859,000 3 ,605 1 " ^ ^0 11,600,880 100,000 100,000 200,000 100,515 100,515 -State-Revolving-Funds ; 009400 3400 Debt Proceeds 7 -74767000 15,955,000 6,300,000 22,255,000 Prior Years 351,213 351,213 Water and Sewer Fund Totals $- 398400 $ 14,624,040 $ 0,330,000 $ 8,854,226 $ 4,050 $ 40,467465 51.376.153 $1,180,000 $1,394,225 517.405,000 58,850.000 530,205.378 Refuse -Fund - Aperaling- Revenues $ 304590 $ $ $ $ $ 304,500 Refuse- Fund- Tefals $ 304,500 $ $ $ $ $ 304400 Stormwater Fund Transfer from Operating Revenues $ 156413 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 156,713 275.000 250.000 650.000 250.000 225.000 $ 1.650,000 - S.dRWMD -Grant 523,360 523 360 Transfer from Grants Fund 37,750 37,750 Stormwater Fund Totals $ 680 $ 276,000 $ 260,000 $ 660,000 $ 240 $ 2,330,073 $ 312,750 $ 250,000 $ 650,000 $ 250,000 $ 225,000 $ 1,687,750 Total Revenues from All Sources $ 4,869 $ 18,913,105 $ 19,979,412 $ 11,470,226 1.-4475400 $ 60,441,305 $ 4,667,352 $ 6,821,706 $ 3,384,225 $ 18,155,000 $ 9,575,000 $ 42,603,283 Sources of Revenue Stormwater Fund Refuse 3.96% 0% General Fund 25.14% aGeneral Fund • Water and Sewer Fund o Refuse aStormwater Fund Water and Sewer Fund 70.9% If low vole SUMMARY OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Facility Type FY- 0940 FY 10 -11 FY 11 -12 FY 12 -13 FY 13 -14 FY14 -15 Total Finance Department $161,191 $161,191 Fire Department $360 $36 $326,000 $49,000 $746,000 $2,060,357 $2,060,357 Police Department $74 884,000 $66 $112,000 $86,000 $411,090 Environmental Services $41, 602, 573 $13 $87-1-607000 $7,460 $3 $36,402,573 $1,688,903 $1,430,000 $2,044,225 $17,655,000 $9,075,000 831.893,128 Leisure Services $68 $30 $988 $66 $136 $840,000 $840,000 Public Works $4027000 $632,716 $5,391,706 $500,000 $500,000 $7,126,422 $756,901 $500,000 $7,648,607 Total Capital Improvements $4,869 $44634716 813467 0385009 83,-275,000 $45 X 985 $4,667,352 86,821,706 $3,384,225 $18.155,000 $9,575,000 $42,603,283 SUMMARY OF COMMITTED AND PLANNED FUNDS Fund FY09 -19 FY 10 -11 FY 11 -12 FY 12 -13 FY 13 -14 FY14 -15 Total General Fund 8176,990 81, 134,716 $6 $ 4 7G 26 7 000 8676,000 $0,410,412 $2,978,449 $5.391,706 81.340,000 $500,000 $500,000 $10,710,155 Water and Sewer Fund 3 4-3 500,000 871607000 7 2,600,000 36,448,000 81.376,153 $1,180,000 $1,394,225 $17,405,000 $8,850,000 $30,205.378 Refuse Fund 304 304 Stormwater Fund 680 680,073 $312,750 $250,000 $650,000 $250,000 $225,000 $1,687,750 Total Committed and Planned Funds $4869 563 814,634,716 813,667,706 89,385,000 $3476 $4642-1 $4,667,352 $6,821,706 $3,384,225 $18,155,000 $9,575,000 $42,603,283 0 000000 ' N. 0 N. 00 0 0 _ 0 0 vi N. 0 in trir:o0ootnN: co u f0 N M u u') to to N QO O H e- 0 " CO N N N CO N M N 69 u, d3 b9 to b9 o 0 O O O in tri Lci to ' R N N 4 N N N 0 69 69 69 b9 69 • 0 O 6' O O 0 0 7 C7 O to M N N C NJ 0 0 N . 0 N 69 b9 69 69 69 O O O O M r O O in tr.) CV CO CO N CO CO to to r T v v NI N 69 69 C9 d9 69 t O O O 0 N 6 6 N N N e- N N 1 l" 11 1.1 0 N 69 (9 b9 69 69 in )() O u) O t( 1 N. 0 r- t .. 0 N 0 h to CV r N n 6 N C M ti C') p N v to O 0 N M 0 O Z Z J F- 69 69 69 69 69 Q a w o Z O • a LL j J U 0 F o • d u ra • 0 Q- V ij u a 0 o E E ° 0 11 - aU W Q f z Z w 2 a 6 6 LL V > > w , n U 0 aa a ) w E 0 ° - a 0 cc Q H y u_ C) o c a) a� a) m > wQ a. a) o.o12 > > c3 r3 c co Q) 0) o 3 ,- . W 2 co a)w c a E m Qa of LL (70� QO > o U ( � Cn O co O 2 O N • 5 QL O N co co C • C = 6 y if) 3'3—<oaF=Q co C C~ v m it) r E a in f' to I - - ► - � Wdi co N in u) d) v 0 CD c • m U_ j w � �0 w E 0000000 • c w c Z a ( 0 ( 0 ( CO CO CO *)Mr)Mr) U cc i • c o o ? c u C 0 0 CO �� co V CO CO V O to In to to u? to u? r • U 0 o o tnu)t o t o tnuito 0 0 o) < 0 0 0 Q N 0 N ) 0 0 10 uj dim d) m d) d) d) d) of w v v v v v v v v v , 2 \ g I - ! k a _ i k _ n -- n - I k _ -- V I I k k • : _ i 6 .1— ' T'72' k CI -, _ •1 � , , ! i i 4 0 0 ` / ce uj o 0 ■ % 69 -• 69 � >-I « e 41 -e d a d §a / « ��2 § a) w� co & ° . ; LU > e $ 8 _§ 2 § a a . CO \ k � : $ / `, \ a) | -�-} / ft / \ | E ` % � .! ' _ § ! ct 7 }§ CO c CL : k \ / \ } O n \ J \\ 2� ƒ ,7 , w 0 0 N co N OM 0 CO O (O I) 000 s- U) Nt400(D 000001 (O0 ' 000 co (00000 N 0 000 0 ((0000 N0 M(0001(O OM 0 0 0 N. NM(D NO. -000(0 M� N r r 0 s (D( O O M H .- IO O 0 0 0 N h(000(ONO (000)0) 0 C co 0 IDO)(0 co 00) 000`"' _ B . - 00 ( -- r N 1- n .- 0`er` N (O N 0(O 1'- N 0 6 N N R v 6 ( A EA EA 69 IA ' co ' ' O O O ' o O O O h o O in O O s- O 6 .- O O 4 o '4) V u ( (S 0 N N 69 U) V) 69 ' O • ' ' O O O ' o O O O v. O 0 , O O (") 0 Lc) . 0 M U u O O N N EA 69 69 EA ■ O O ' 0 ' 0 O 0 0 0 O ' co o (,.) o o o O co O 0 0 0 co N 0 ( m CO N 100 N0 1 M N ,_ N (A EA EA 69 ' 0 ED ' ' CO O ( O O (D ' N 000 0 N 0 ( V co 0 •' ( (0 CO 0 CO '- O a O O) 0 N tD M 0 V G N N EA 69 69 EA N 0 CO N 0 (O1- 00 0) NI-u)O m (D 63 ' 00 00 CO LO 00 N V 000 0 N ( 0 r' CO CD Nt00)M 00N ' NM(DN 0M pO � 0 (0000)u V O 0 (0 � p to O ( CO O 0 O�co O .. p s- s"" V ,- N I"- CO r G v 0 (0 0) s- Z N N d N ? LL CO LL N LL J r Z ef (A Z EA EA EA Q 0 U 0 Zn o W0 o f w a LL O Q w r fx - a2 c U o CO W d d > m = Q N W a z u o l- Q w E CD E CO Q CO CO O W CO z cc � a } U j U o L. Ll U E O N W C D -o - 0 U V u) N 8 N 0 -0 lLL r > Y a) u ' D 7 7 CO Z O C 0 C' 01 (0 t U. 1 y (71 a) (p 0 --. c 3`a E( a Edo w o Y �1 UJ v y ( 7 ) m m N o W c m n a) � a Y 3 v LT. 7.. • m w (7) Lo n 'v n»v > ma c 1- 0 0 0 0 0 0 E- 0 o Q> � CO 0 cc Q o m a) ` o W p -C CO m (a a Y m a?O ?w �wdww O J 2 Cr - m J a) N co co co co Q co co } < O Q U o 0 O d O) 2 d Q o c o c c c c o c c o r m U 7 c m c rn c L r 0 (` O m (` o a a) o 0 0 0 0 m c l- JI`I - I - I` U- I- la o o I- U. U o M o 0) r pc (n >U in S`1 02 co )r ( 1 ) 0 o I co u1 01 t T ` ti) . c E w 0 . N '- M '9 W (1) 0000 v , t ((c00 � (0 E 0000000000 p O 000 N. (0 p 7 00000 O co UJ 0 N M r 0 (f (A 1)) 0 (D 0 co j c o 00000 0000 rn c Z (( omm000 ( D(o(D� a p c p c u 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 0 cr) 0 co o o o o o o o o co o d cococococococococococo W U M co co co co co co co co co co o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. U 00000000000 U ( nv)(n(1) Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q N (n L0 L0 L0 (!) (n (() V) 0 (n p i 0000000000 Lo n(nu1(n n n (n n) a 00000000000 v ) (n � I n n n (n cJ co co co co co co co co co co co co co co co co co co co co co M N co co M co co co co M co co co ` M co co co co M co co co co co 3 a) rn a W The Capital Improvement Program m as set forth in this document is a � ong range planning tool for the City of Edgewater. The document reflects five years of capital outlay with the first year officially adopted as part of the fiscal year 2009 -zu10 2010 -2011 budget by the City Council. The remaining years in the CIP serve as a planning guide, which is reviewed annually. The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) provides a planned and programmed approach to utilizing the City's financial resources in the most responsive and efficient manner to meet its service and facility needs. The CIP serves as a "blueprint" for the future of the community. Development of the CIP requires integration of financial, engineering, and planning functions. The CIP also incorporates needs identified in the Capital Improvements Element (CIE). The CIE fo- cuses on anticipated infrastructure requirements for six facility types required by the State of Flor- ida, Parks, Solid Waste, Stormwater, Transportation, Water, and Wastewater. The CIE focuses on service level standards and the land use plan adopted by the City Council in order to preclude deficiencies in adopted level of services. The CIP is developed to achieve the following results: * Consolidating and coordinating all department requests with the goal of reducing unnecessary delays and coordinating individual departments' improvement programs. * Establishing a system of procedures and priorities by which each proposal can be evaluated in terms of public need, the comprehensive planning of the area, and the interrelationships of projects and cost requirements. * Scheduling capital projects over an extended period so the most efficient financial plan for the CIP can be achieved. * Assuring that the 5 -year schedule of improvements for each type of facility is financially feasible. * Successfully implement level of service standards for public facilities as outlined in Florida Statutes Chapter 163, part of which states: Provide that public facilities and services meet or exceed the standards established in the Capital Improvements Element required by F.S. 163.3177 and are available when needed for the development, or that development orders and permits are conditioned on the availability of these public facilities and services necessary to serve the proposed development. Not later than one year after its due date established by the state land planning agency's rule for submission of local comprehensive plans pursuant to F.S. 163.3167(2), a local government shall not issue a development order or permit which results in a reduction in the level of services for the effected public facilities below the level of services provided in the comprehensive plan of the local government. • 0 0 O 2 N- o H o ! 1 ! O V) CD N CO O O O O O O O O If O O T O O M t() O t`9 to O o N N to Eft to O O O O 6' O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O o 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O) O U) V e • O Q) U) Ov N 1� U) M N U) N to M O O N N tH to d3 (O (O O (o O (o 0 O O O 00 N (O O N O _ _ N _ 00)0) Oo O) a . (f) a M r to N tor: O M O G v- lf) N N fl) 6 fA d9 r r O o r O • N 0 Z n u c) 0 ° a) i ... c) c) Q d 0 o : o O I ' 4 d N ix LLI 0 el GI p Z Z Z - • a U. > J Oa H W d'— F- as Q as W J Q F. — W < 1- LL U = — o cc cc m �, E cu 1- W F W - Z (o L Q Z U W C C o c co LL > C (A 1 O to C to 0 tv t o a) m a rn a) ( (0 (n F- c co .c W e co O Q y a) N N - O > i a) Y to Q V > a Q ) W N Q c o E cr N , r m W LO Q c (° o o p 2 co a`> a N to (a (a C7 Q „" N T a) > a) >. Y co co a. W `- I — c c co" C p) c Occ o `2O oao a) o 0 a` p ti E t- CO c 5 r) Y O 2 F '. tu o m• IIP U w r d 2 W y W � � If If o 0 N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 () () c) r- .- 0 0 In c) 7 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 a N r rn0000 y w �n(n(nu (n tnuO U yR; w (fl (o (fl (o co (fl (0 M : . mi l ( 0 c > > y o 00000o a� ti, N o co co o CC) CO 0 r T l V CO M CO CO M V O U) 9 9 to t!) U) U) w u 00000 u a L() LO LO 1.0 LO a) . __.. Q 0 0 0 0 0 Q 10 U7 to to U) U) (n (n to ( to (n 0) .. �. 0 0 0 0 0 (n f) U) 'p 0 0 0 0 0 (n N N to '0 L0 (n W M CO CO M M M CO M M M M CO (o co () co co M co co co co co co \r ♦/ 0 O N M t- ' 888888888A8888P8888888888888 _ - - . O 0 O N N N p p p O O O p O O pp O O O (1 a 0 O O N pp O h pp O 0 O O o O N a ) O O u) N O j o 0 N u) M O N N m O h (h N n to o In o 09 C) O -- 01 m O 0 0 iY NNN (`')N M N NN M)'.M°N 0) (o 0) NO (ON H n N 01 I ° N " '- t 0 1 69 69 p f9 c9 0 O O O 5� 0 O O O 0 S O 25 0 0 0 • Ul V 00 M V uu Mm O N • (O m o m N °i N N 69 p 65 W (o Q 19 O O O O p0 , , O 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 gp ' 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . ° - 000 u) u) r O oOO O O U) 000 u) u) 00 u) O (3) I-- 00) 0) 0 C) CO 00 00 N O) C M .- N C) `7 00 "-- N to 0 M° O , - 4.11 0: 0 0V0.10- 69 N 69 69 to 69 69 p p N N ' - O N 0 0 0 N N N O r N o O N ° "tT O cif co OO ° N M 0) N M° N M ( N 04 d) 69 69 p 1A 69 N 8 8 N ' O O O 0 0 EC ' I- 0 co c c o - N 4.0 t u O W v ' CO r O `-- O N N 69 69 69 W 69 0 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 p O0 p 0 0 ) . 6) ' . - 0 N 4- o p 0 0 0 0 C O O po O O O O M N O N (•) (' 0 O -t f ( ` 0 N N N O N M LL o .- O .— O Z h- N N 3 W 61 69 69 69 4.9 < a 0 0 I- C Wwa O 2 LLw< W 0. 0 c f- a u (rs 0) a 2r_ E w --I Z d 0 a N .o o Ill . ( 1 E w 0 E a > m o o) E o W d 0 Z Q g n 2 Z Q H 'H 3 ' n O V E Q'' N G) m y u) 4) p W N O. ' W 0 lL E C N a w > rn m d o v (LE) d 3 c u w E n n E a w W m 5 0 0 n E o _ c c a) o c 3 c a § u) a , m U W r d N co U co C o m N O. c J O f` C co O? :-,-(ac 'O N O N >Q 0 co 0 L m 0E S y w L — ..- ctM a .� m ya m v c cc c _ p m v C C R' 8 ' C m N co LL z E E E d w N 1. N C— c. O. C n C V U f0 E U ik 0 N N N N w W ce U O (0 u) C N .G C Q' O t0 0) N 0 d L Q '= N 0- v` (U f 0 E 0 U `. tt c c c n o ° N u a u U _ a o c n u Cr' C ° R E D O =° m _ N N IP. 0 0 t 6) d f0 H C C N 0) 01 s 0 (0 v F- L 10 L J V) w O O F it H 0 d r �' Ss�j U c' (n J w= cc d' cc (1) U$ m C c m U (..1 lL U N (o i> I- 6 4 m W • ^.1914 E « O c o O w N O N M y 0 0 N N 0) 2 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O to _ 0 c w °) Z 0 ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° yy yy ° ° ° O (o j O d a) O O O T m m C (O (0 (n (D (D (D (D (D (0 (O (0 (0 (0 (0 ( ° D .... (0 (O ((0 0O 0D 0O 00 0 00 0 (o 00 w \' O n o m (� d _ , w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to - .) • co CO CO GO m m 2222 m m m m m (o m m m m m m m m m m m m m (o m m m m (() 5 V o M M (7 r ) 8 O u, (n u) u ) u ) N (O to t0 N u) (n No N V) N u) cn (n N u) u) (n ,( V O O O U a u) N uS u) N u5 u) u) N N u) N (h N v) V) VI u) u) N N N (A V) u) u) u) u) LOU' Q 0 O O O 0 O O Q u) u) N u) u) u) u) u) u) N u) u) u) N u) N u) 0) u) u) u) u) u) N N N u) N 0000 0 u)u)u)NU) u)N U) 0) 0)m u)u)u) 41) U) NU) NN u) u1N u) u)u)u) 4 O 00 0 O NNNU) to u) u)u) u) N U N N ) ) u ) u ) v) u) NN N u) u)u)u1 ° 4 °a 4 4 4 4 0 0 4 4 . y y v o o v 4 4 4 v 4 4 4 o Q V °° V ° V 7 0 0 ' c 4 v° ' c 7 CI Cr v o v a v v V 7 d 7 V C V V a a(0 v Cr Cr Cr o (0 ° c LL Fo ci. U `m To 3 a) rn - o in W ! ! ! .....- §' •:::, •::. o . O CV CO CV -: (1 O O O O O O r O ld o A M c M NN.. T N N to CD . o i - M - N N N N • N N T • r T T O O N N Ell ! ! r T •' r 0 N N a Z 63 LL ' Z I— O O J W r Q a ' 0 T 0 Z re N M N O cl. O w 4- f o Q 2 U ~ ' J z c �a .. o • W� z ifl c) . v J > Q c a: m a) - c 0 0 L > a m m o Po , a_ m 00 .E _ 3 ..'ca co N LO 0 z co w m IC? 45 3 w a iv - co ' ce Y) O , m a Li) ° U : a �m - w m o . o co cn 0 0 0 = v Q c a . W cn uo .` 0y N U C , � _ '7 �w Q. N . 2 U •w U� J a Z ° m mO vI cv F- i cn c w "'rte a c c a d > i V) w a te + •D N I U M O 0 0 Ql E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o d = V V co W C Z V V V' V V V V V ' tt ' V V V V V (.7 ' ++ 00 O +' +" (fl CO Cfl CD Cfl O 3 CO 3 CO O O M C - 3 - c") _ m y 0 Q) ' ` , • O 0 O • 0 00 O O co co co e0 co co co co co co c0 M co co cp V M M co C) N in N lf) U7 l() l!') Cn t!) LO i Cn 141 LO 00 o v a L() cn000cnu)cncncr) cncn nLt)(0 Q o o o Q Lo Lo 10 10 10 10 10 LO (0 (r) LO 1 LO In O co 0 «) to LO 1.0 t!') to to LO .n LO -0 v v v v v v v a v v- -- v v v v v V' V V v v v v v v v v •v v v v v v v ill v v v v v 4 c v v v v v v v v v v v / City of E� G E WA TER Inc. 1951 1 �r S t4ti'� CITY OF EDGEWATER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT DEFECTIVE i L D CHAPTER IX CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions --- Text with strikethrough = deletions) TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION B. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS INVENTORY 1. Needs Derived from Other Elements 19I -5.016 (1)(a), F.A.C.] _ 2 2. Existing Financial Resources_ _ 8 3. Local Revenue Sources 19J -5.016 (1)(c), F.A.C.1 _ 9 4. State Sources [9J -5.016 (1)(c), F.A.C.1 13 C. FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS AND LOANS [91 -5.016 (1)(C), F.A.C.1 15 D. LOCAL POLICIES AND PRACTICES [9J-5.016 F.A.C.] 18 1. Level of Service Standards [9J -5.016 (2)(a), F.A.C.] s 18 2. Capital Improvements Program (CIP) [9J -5.016 (2)(a), F.A.C.] 20 3. Impact Fees [9J -5.016 (1)(c), F.A.C.] 20 4. Utility Service Areas [9J -5.016 (1)(b), F.A.C.] 21 5. User Charges and Connection Fees [9J -5.016 (1)(c), F.A.C.1 21 6. Concurrency Management Systen[9J -5.016 (2)(a), F.A.C.]_., 7. Mandatory Dedication or Fees in Lieu Of 22 8. Moratoria 23 E. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS _23 1. Fiscal Assessment [9J -5.016 (2)(b), F.A.C.]_ 23 F. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES 34 I NT R O D ION UCT 1 11 \ 1 1\ V 1J V 1 1 IX -ii CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions -- Text with strikethrough = deletions) A. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS INVENTORY 2 1. Needs Derived-from-Other-Elements -- 2 2. Existing EximeiaMetLeurces 5 B. FEDERAL GRANTS-AND-LOANS _ 1 2 L• DERAL AND STATE 1 L �� 1V C. LOCAL POLICIES AND PRACTICES 15 $: T YSIS - 20 E. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POD 31 CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT A. PUBLIC FACILITIES, CAPACITIES AND LEVEL -OF- SERVICE INVENTORY FOR CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT _ CM 1 1. Transportation CM 1 2. Sanitary Sewer CM 1 3. Potable Water CM 2 4. Solid Waste Disposal CM 2 5. Stormwater Drainage CM 2 6. Recreation and Open Space CM 3 7. Public Schools s CM 3 B. CONCURRENCY ASSESSMENT CM 3 1. Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, and Potable Water Facilities CM 4 2. Parks and Recreation Facilities _ CM 5 3. Transportation Facilities CM 5 4. School Facilities CM 6 IX -iii CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions -- Text with strikethrough = deletions) C. GENERAL RULES FOR CQNCURRENCY ASSESSMENT CM 7 1. Existing Deficiencies ......... ........................... . ......................... CM 7 2. Approved Impacts CM 7 3. Phasing CM 7 4. Time Specific Approval_ CM 7 5. Additional Information M 8 6. Transportation CM 8 7. Sanitary Sewer CM 8 8. Potable Water CM 9 9. Solid Waste CM 9 10. Stormwater Drainage CM 9 11. Recreation CM 10 D. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES _CM11 A. PUBLIC FACILITIES, CAPACITIES -AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE OF SEAVICE Y i _INVENTOR L __ . L \v1L11 LJ Lal LL- VI- JL1 \ ♦1\.iL L \1 1� FOR CONCURRENCY M � 1\ MANAGEMENT - 1. Iransppo tation - - 1 2. Sanitary Sewer 1 3. P W a a .... 1 4. Solid Waste Disposal 2 5. Sto.mm J. V1V 1111`�VPaTGTDZ- [ililazo � _._ � -- 2 6. Recreation And Open- Spaee -- - 2 B. CONCURRENCY ASSESSMENT 3 d Potable Water -Facilities— 3 raiL:a�e, and o�uvL\. rr _ ✓ IX -iv CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions --- Text with strikethrough = deletions) 2. Parks and Recreation Faeilitics - - 4 3. Transportat Facilities 4 • • - e • ONCURRENCY ASSESSMENT - . 5 1. Existing Dcfcicncics -_ 5 - -- droved- Impaaets— — 5 6 4. Time S_pecifie- Approval - 6 . Trans portat i on 7Oew er 7 er 7 9. Solid Waste 7 10. - Storrnwater Drainage - ,. 7 11 R .a: 8 11 V D. COALS } OBJECT VES AND POLICIES 9 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: City of Edgewater Capital Improvement Schedule Fiscal Years Ending 2009 2013 2011 -2015 3 Table 2: 29 99 -2013 2011 -2015 Volusia County School District Five -Year Work Program 7 Table 3: Adjusted Taxable Income Projections _24 Table 4: Ad Valorem Tax Yield Pro _25 IX -v CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) Table 5: Revenue Projections Affecting Capital Improvements _ 25 Table 6: Expenditure Projections for Scheduled Capital Improvements _ 27 Table 7: Debt Service Expenditure Projections 28 Table 8: Annual Operating Expenditures _ 29 Table 9: Fiscal Assessment No. 1 30 Table 10: Anticipated Increase in Ad Valorem Tax Revenue Projections 31 Table 11: City of Edgewater Five Year Schedule of Improvements Fiscal Years Ending 2010-2014 2011 -2015 44 Table 12: Long Term (10 year) Transportation Improvements _ _46 Table CM -I: Level -of- Service Standards CM 14 T-able I - -Capital Improvements- Schedule Tablc 2 — Volusia County School District Fivc Ycar Work Program Tab tions Affecting Capital Improvcmcnts :; -.. ' : . : ed Capital - Improvements #ing- able Tablc 9 — Fivc Year Schedule of Improvcmcnts Tablc CM- 1 -Level of Service Standards LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Federal Grant Agencies and Program Titles 17 Figure 1 — Federal Grant Agencies and - Program Titles II IX -vi CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) CHAPTER IX CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT A. _ INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) is to evaluate the need for public facilities as identified in other Elements of this Plan. In addition, the Capital Improvements Element will present an analysis of the fiscal capability of the City to fund needed public facilities, recommend financial policies to guide the funding of those identified improvements, and to schedule the funding and construction of improvements in a manner necessary to ensure that capital improvements are provided when required. Needed capital improvements are those which are necessary to meet the adopted level of service (LOS) standards identified in other eElements of this Plan. The City's of-Edgewater public facilities which require identification and funding are: • Transportation Element — Roadways which are under the jurisdiction of the City, and those roadways which the City wishes to aid in funding improvements. • Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element — Sanitary sewer treatment and effluent disposal facilities necessary to serve the existing and future population of the City. In addition, recommendations for capital improvements and policies to ensure adequate sanitary sewer collection facilities. • Solid Waste -Sub Element — Solid waste disposal facilities to service the City's existing and future population, coordination with Volusia County to ensure those facilities are available when needed, and recommendations for adequate solid waste collection methods. • Drainage- Stormwater Sub- Element — Drainage systems necessary to meet recommended level-of servieeLOS standards for stormwater quality and conveyance and coordination with Volusia County for improvements to systems in basins which serve the City but are outside its jurisdiction. • Potable Water Sub — Element — Potable water treatment facilities necessary to service the existing and future population of the City. In addition, recommendations for capital improvements and policies to ensure adequate potable water delivery facilities. • Recreation /Open Space Element — Recreation facilities and land areas necessary to meet the recommended level- of- servieeLOS standards. The cCapital Improvements eElement will also present methods to ensure "concurrency" as defined and required in Chapter 9J -5.003 and 9J- 5.016, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The Element will also present methods to monitor the "cConcurrency mManagement sSystem" as defined and required in Chapter 9J -5.003 and 9J- 5.0055, F.A.C. IX -1 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) A.B._ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS INVENTORY 1. Needs Derived from Other Elements [9J-5.016 (4(a), F.A.C.] The analysis documented in the preceding comprehensive plan elements have identified facility improvements needed to meet the existing service deficiencies and those needed to meet the demands of future growth. The geographic service areas and locations were identified for major public education and public health system components. System components whose service areas include the City of Edgewater are identified in the list in Table 1. The public education system is operated by the Volusia County School Board, and the public health systems are operated by the Volusia County Health Department. The Volusia County School Board presently bases its needs assessments on the findings of the Educational Plant Survey, prepared every five years by the State Department of Education in accordance with Florida Statutes. The last survey was completed in April 2008. The results of this survey indicated a need for a new kK -8 school to be built in the City-of Edgewater. The School Board, based on this report, has acquired a site for this facility along S.R. 442 in the southwestern section of the City, which- is anticipated to open - August 2014however there is no anticipated construction date until funding becomes available and enrollment increases. Indian River Elementary School will be addinghas completed an eleven (11) proposed classrooms to- addition at it-sits location. The remaindcrof -thc existing remaining educational facilities were noted as being in excellent or good condition and were adequately served by roadways, sanitary sewer, solid waste, stormwater drainage, potable water, and recreation facilities. The State Department of Children and Families (DCF) determines the need for new health care facilities with a formula based on occupancy rates, historic use by age group, and population projections by age group. Although Edgewater currently has no full- service hospitals, there is Bert Fish Medical Center located just outside the corporate City limits that serves the Edgewater area. Based on growth forecasts a hospital will not be needed before 20202030. Halifax Hospice currently has under construction,operates a 12 -bed patient care facility located at 4140 S. Ridgewood Avenue in Edgewater. Individual capital improvement needs identified in this eElement are, for the most part, those improvements, which cost $25,000 or more and are generally non - recurring purchase items. The capital improvements identified in the other elements of this Comprehensive Plan are listed with a brief description in Table 1 along with their estimated costs and projected year of expenditure. The improvements are listed by type of service, related to the various elements IX -2 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions - Text with strikethrough = deletions) of the Comprehensive Plan. As required by Section 9J- 5.016, F.A.C., the Capital Improvements Element addresses existing and future capital improvements needed for at least the first five fiscal years after the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, Table 1 lists improvements identified for the years..-20-10----20-1-4 2011 -2015. [9J -5.016 (2)(c), F.A.C.] Funding sources for these capital improvements are listed in Table 911. Table 2 identifies the Volusia County School District Five -Year Work Program which must be referenced within in City's CIE per the Public Schools Facility Element. Table 1: City of Edgewater Capital Improvement Schedule Fiscal Years Ending 2010- 2014 2011 -2015 Project Fiscal Year 2009 -2010 2010 -2011 2011 -2012 2012 -2013 2013 -2014 2014 -2015 Total FINANCE DEPARTMENT: YMCA HVAC Upgrade $96,615 $96,615 Council Chamber Bathroom Renovation $62,250 $62,230 Current ..Year Unreserved $2326 $2326 Finance Dept. Totals $161,191 _ $161,191 1 FIRE DEPARTMENT Vehicle Replacement $ - $350,000 $200,000 $40,000 $590,000 12 Lead/ EKG Monitor $25,000 $25,000 Genisis Extrication Tool - System $30,000 $30,000 Self -Contained Breather- - Apparatus $100,000 $100,000 Station 55 Replacement $2,060,357 $2,060,357 Fire Dept. Totals $ - $350,000 $30,000 $325,000 $40,000 $745,000 $2,060,357 $2,060,357 POLICE DEPARTMENT: Vehicle Replacement $74,990 $84,000 $56,000 $112, $85,000 $41- 1-,990 Police Dept. Totals $7n 990 $84 000 $56,000 e 2 0 $a 0n $74,990 w $56,00 w ll ,0 0 w �5,,,.,0 $411,990 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES: Vehicle Replacement $304,500 $770,000 5620,000 $750,000 $250,000 $2,694,500 Retrofit Lift Stationl, 2, 5 $283,000 F000 535-3,000 Western Storage Tank & Pump Station $130,000 $130 SE Storage Tank & Pump Station $1,200,000 $1,200,000 IX -3 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) Project Fiscal Year 2009 -2010 2010 -2011 2011 -2012 2012 -2013 2013 -2014 2012015 Total W VTP Rehab/Replacement $3,004 $3,000,000 WWTP building printing, survey, gcotech $314,800 $314,800 2.5 MGD Wastewater $1 5;004,000 Treatment Plant $1,009,000 $7,500,000 $6,,500,000 $7,500,944 16,500,000 114,0()04101) SE Service Area Reclaimed Improvements $5,909,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $25 $25,000 Wells 21 -24 and raw $2 f 00 water mains $2,300,000 $2,300,000 84,600,000 ART wells-17,18,19,20 $4,800,000 $4 Aerator and stairway $1- 50,000 replaecment $150,000 Replacement of 2 $50 ;000 Water Lines " 550,000 550,000 $50,000 $50,000 3200,000 Western Reclaimed Water- -Main Extension $350000 $3,500,000 Wildwood Subdivision - $30,000 $270,000 sliplining $125,000 $30,000 $210,000 $125,000 Undesignated Projects $250,,000 $250,000 Eastern Shores $680,0 Project $680 Water Line Enhancement $100.000 Reclaimed Watel Stora e Project $100,000 Reclaim Water Improvements $50,000 Cricone Painting $150,000 RTURTU Upgradds $30,000 Sliplining Sewers $200,000 Lift Station 1 Rehab $150,000 Engineering study for coly_r_& DBP $24,0(10 Unforeseen Projects $26_1.30 Reclaimed Water Line Extensions $50,000 Reuse Pump Station $330,000 IX -4 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions --- Text with strikethrough = deletions) Project Fiscal Year 2009 -2010 2010 -2011 2011 -2012 2012 -2013 2013 -2014 2014 -2015 Total Sludge hand, emergency _ powerjab 5750,000 Contract Administration $375,725 10% project contingency bid 5418,500 Barscreen and headworlrs $250,000 Influent Pump Station $300,000 Internal recycle pump station $175,000 BTlL Train #1 &,/t2 5500,000 Chlorine, S02 and Alum Feed $330,000 Clarifiers, RAS & WAS _pumping $435,000 Third Clarifier Building $800,000 Filters 530,000 CL2 Contract $285,000 Educational component Eastern Shores $37 750 Pea 1 Street St rmwater Improvement Project $150,000 Hart Avenue CIP Project $650,000 Lamont Street& Riverside Drive CIP Project 5250,000 Est Palm Way & Riverside Drive CIP Project 5250,000 East Turgot Avenue & Riverside Drive CIP Project $225,000 Environmental $4,692,573 $13,500,000 $8,150,000 $7,460,000 $2,600,000 $36,402,573 Services Totals $1,688,903 $1,430,000 $2,044,225 $17,655,000 $9,075,000 $31,893128 LEISURE SERVICES: Vehicle la $6Q 000 $3n 0n $5 00n $296,000 Rep cement - w .,,,,�„J $30,000 $148,000 w .,0,., Kennedy Park Renovations Phase II $290,000 $290,000 Dog Park $50,000 $50,000 Mango Lake Park $500,000 $500,000 IX -5 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions -- Text with strikethrough = deletions) Project Fiscal Year 2009 -2010 2010 -2011 2011 -2012 2012 -2013 2013 -2014 2014 -2015 Total Parks and $988,000 $1,136,000 Recreation Totals - $68,000 $30,000 $840,000 $50,000 $840,000 PUBLIC WORKS: Road Repaving $475,000 52-P77,000 $102,000 $150,282 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500000 $2,150,282 Signalize SR442 @ I- 95 $287,546 $287,546 30th Street Sidewalk $157,716 $157 $600,619 $606,4.19 Indian River Blvd. Extension (approx. 1 mile) $4,604,160 $4,604,160 Public Works Totals $632,716 $7,126,422 $102,000 $756,901 $5,391,706 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $7,648,607 All Projects Totals $14,634,716 $13,657,706 $V85,000 $3,275,000 $45,821,985 $4,869,563 $4,667,352 $6 $3,,384,225 18,155,000 $9,575,000 $42,603,283 Source: City of Edgewater Planning Division, 2009 2010 IX -6 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions -- Text with strikethrough = deletions) Table 2: 2010 2014 .2011 -2015 Volusia County School District Five -Year Work Program Project Type Fiscal Year 2009-2010 2010 -2011 2011 -2012 2012-2013 i 2013 -2014 2014 -2015 New Construction None without additional rcvcnue Marks Elm - Replacement-School 97-1290 1-7,682 New Elm "A "- Relieve Cypress C -reek, Horizon, 988 Chisolm New Elm !C-"-Relieve 988000 New - -8 "FF" Relieve New Smyrna- -Mid Indian 1 38,730 River Edgewater Pierson /Seville Elm- Replacement 18,600,000 Total New Construction 1,120,000 971,290 77,008,000 Major Projects at Existing Schools and Facilities Dekona HS- Rereof -ampus 2,880,000 Enterprise-Elm- Addition 1,500,000 500 Enterprise -Elm 9 Classroom-Addition 2 Enterprise-Elm---9-Classroom-Addition 2 Holly Hill- Mid--- Demo-Buildings 410,000 Horizon Elm 9 Classroom- Addition 2,800,000 Pine Ridge HS WAC Bldg 5 1,516,000 Portables -Lease 1,200,000 1,000 250,000 250 250,000 800 Q00 600,000 500,000 250,000 Portables- Move and Compliance 690 640 590,000 540,000 490,000 600,000 500,000 500,000 400 0.00 400,000 SeabreezeFIS 10 Year-Sports- Complex Lease 600,000 Southwestern Mid - Additions 500,000 5000,000 500 4.000.000 Sunrise Elm 9 Classroom Addition 2 Various Schools -Minor Projects 1 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 Various Facilities - Facilities Review Projects 3 8,000 8,000 8,000,000 8000 4 650,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5000,000 5,000,000 Total Major Projects at Existing Schools & 21,608,442 16,350,000 15,140,000 1%590,000 10,040,000 Facilities 11,350,000 7,400,000_ 7,300,000 6,950,000 6,950,000 Facilities Management Facilities Management - Various Projects 3,000000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3 000 000 3,000,000 1.814,781 1,000,000_ 1,000,000 1,000,004 1,000,000 Technology Network, EDP & Communications 9,000,000 9,000 9,000,000 9,000,000 9,000,000 6.000.000 6,000,000 6000,000 6.000,000 6,000,000 System Wide Equipment & Vehicles Various Schools & Departments Furniture & 1 1 1,800,000 1 1,80000 Equipment 1,300 000 1,300,000 1 300000 1 300,000 1,300,000 Buses Transportation Dept - Bus Replacement 7,239, -765 4 777,422 4,976,466 Transfers Transfers - Debt Service 51,599,110 51,602,925 51,601,151 51,598,274 57,057,765 51,599,888 51,603,928 IX -7 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions -- Text with strikethrough = deletions) Project Type Fiscal Year 2009 -2010 2010 -2011 2011 -2012 2012 -2013 2013 -2014 2014 -215 Transfers - Equipment Leases & Property Insurance 3,411,250 3,411,250 3,411,250 3,411,250 3,411,250 3,407,250 3,407,250 3,407,250 3,407,250 3,407,250 Transfers - Maintenance 15,800,000 15,800,000 15,800,000 15,800,000 15,800,000 15,800,000 Total Transfers 70,810,360 70,814,175 70,812,401 70,809,524 76,269,015 70810,175 70,808,401 70,805,524 70,807,138 70,811,178 Totals 108218,782 100,964,175 100,872,401 96,170,814 184,356,780 91,2 86,508,401 86,405,524 90,834,360 91,037,644 Source: Volusia County School District, 5 -Year Work Program Adopted 09/15/09 09/14/10 Each capital improvement project is described briefly in Table 1. In addition, the reason for the project is identified and estimated total project cost is provided. For ease of review, the projects have been grouped by facility type. As indicated, capital improvement projects have been identified for general, public safety, sanitary sewer, potable water, drainage, stormwater, parks and recreation, and transportation facilities. It should be noted that the capital improvement projects contained in Table 1 are not inclusive of all the anticipated capital expenditures by the City during the planning period. Table 1 is limited only to those major components identified by the preceding elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan (CP) in order to analyze development impacts and trends at a level of detail which is both manageable and fairly accurate. [9J -5.016 (2)(c), F.A.C. The cost estimates for the capital improvements indicated in this eElement were developed using standard engineering practice regarding construction costs, in conjunction with information derived from actual construction costs of similar projects, certified bid documents on similar projects, and engineering cost estimates conducted on similar projects. 2. Existing Financial Resources The first step in planning capital improvements, as well as arranging the necessary financing through the budgeting process, is to inventory the major sources of funding available to the City. These major sources of funding are expected to contribute a total revenue sum of $2$ $39 2533527 in fiscal year 24192011. The revenue sources listed below comprises a working inventory for which the City's ability to fund the needed capital improvements will be assessed. In addition, the current status of each revenue source currently used by the City is indicated. It is important to note that the list below includes all of the major financial resources available to the City and is not limited to the funds which will be used for the capital improvement projects identified in the 5year Schedule of Improvements included in this eElement. These currently utilized financial resources comprise, in part, the revenue sources which will be used to fund the identified capital improvements projects. IX -8 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions -- Text with strikethrough = deletions) 3. Local Revenue Sources j9f -5.016 (1)(c), F.A.C.] a. Property Taxes (Ad Valorem) Property taxes are normally based on a millage rate (i.e. one mill equates to $1 per $1000 of assessed value, or .1%), which is then applied to the taxable value of all real property, as well as all other tangible personal property. The revenue from ad valorem taxes may be used to fund both operating costs and capital projects, unless prohibited by local policies. Provisions at the State level exist for raising the millage rate above the 10 -mill cap set by local referendum for debt service or provision of municipal -type services within the City. CURRENT STATUS: As the major source of revenue for the City of Edgewater, ad valorem taxes normally-account for approximately 41.35% of the City's annual budget for the General Fund. The City's current millage rate for the General Revenue Fund is set at approximately 6.36 - 6.591 mills. The expected tax yield for fiscal year 201-0 2011 is $4-,968,598- $4,289,714 _- from a tax base (adjusted taxable value) of $822,687,956 $685,099,203. b. Public Utility or User Charges The revenue from these charges is generated primarily as a result of the rates charged to City residents of utilization of City-owned utilities such as water, sewer, drainage stormwater, and solid waste removal /disposal. Revenue from these operations include user fees, miscellaneous customer service charges, and interest income. CURRENT STATUS: The expected public utility revenue for fiscal year 201A 2011 is estimated to be approximately $11,950,634.$11,495,882. c. Other taxes, fees, and charges This category of revenue source includes special assessments, various administrative fees, and other charges for using services or facilities owned and operated by the City. Some examples of these charges are public document sales, property appraisal fees, fines and forfeitures, permit and license fees, City fund interest income, City property sale income, rental income, and all private contributions (real estate, gifts, donations, etc) to the City. CURRENT STATUS: Approximately 3 4% of the City's General Fund revenues are generated from these sources. In fiscal year - 2010 the sum of $382,27 -8- 4462,499 is expected to be generated by these fund sources. IX -9 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions -- Text with strikethrough = deletions) d. Franchise Fees The City currently charges a franchise fee (based on the applicable gross revenues charged) for utility services, which are provided by private companies within the City. CURRENT STATUS: Approximately 7.9-1 9.01% of the City's General Fund revenues are generated from this source. For fiscal year 201- 0_2011, it is anticipated that $992,-0 -37 $1,100 in revenue will be generated from this funding source. e. Public Service or Utility Tax A municipality may levy a tax on the purchase of electricity, metered or bottled gas, water, cable television, and telecommunication services. The tax may be levied upon only the purchases within the municipality and may not exceed ten (10) percent of the applicable payments received by the seller of the taxable item from the purchaser of the purchase of such service. CURRENT STATUS: The City currently charges a public service or utility tax on the previously mentioned applicable and available utility services, with the exception of cable television services. The City presently charges ten (10) percent of revenues for electricity, gas and water, and seven (7) percent of revenues for telecommunications. For fiscal year 20102011, the City anticipates receiving $2,068,097— $20 in public service or utility tax revenue, which amounts to approximately 16:49 of the estimated General Fund revenue. f. Special Source of Revenue Additional funding mechanisms are sometimes required due to the availability of existing revenue sources and /or the project priorities assigned by the City Council. The options available to the City regarding alternate sources of revenue for funding capital improvement projects are listed below. 1) System Development of Impact fees. Fees which are charged in advance of new development to pay for infrastructure needs, but not operating costs, resulting directly from the new development. The fees must be equitably allocated to the specific group(s) which directly benefit from the capital improvements. In addition, the assessment levied must fairly reflect the true cost of the capital improvements. CURRENT STATUS: The City currently charges impact fees for water and wastewater services, and for parks. Approximately $40,4300 $155,700 in impact IX -10 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions Text with strikethrough = deletions) fee revenues (including interest income on fund balances) are expected to be generated during fiscal year -201 -0.2011 g. Special Assessment Similar to impact fees, special assessments are charged to residents, agencies or areas who- which directly benefit from the provision of a new service or facility by the City. For example, the construction of a gravity sewer system for an existing neighborhood may be financed through a special assessment to the neighborhood's individual homeowners rather than through a revenue fund of the City. The requirement that all of the City's residents fund the new sewer system through a City revenue source is not considered equitable. CURRENT STATUS: The City currently has two special assessments in the Florida Shores area, one for sewer, and one for paving. The sewer assessment was started in November 1992 and the paving assessment was started in November 1994. The long- term debt service associated with the special assessment bonds is- summarized -- below:was paid off in fiscal year 2010. SRF Watcr- and Year General Storffiwater Sewer -Fund 2040 $8553 $3- 52,872 2014 $443 $483 2042 2013 2044 $1,627,592 h. Borrowing Occasionally, many local governments are required to resort to borrowing funds to pay for capital improvements due to their extremely high cost. Usually, either long -term or short-term financing is used to provide these funds. The short-term financing option is normally handled by local banks and is used to raise the required revenue for periods of one to five years. The more customary method is to authorize long -term bond issues, which range in length from five to thirty years. Listed below are several types of bond issues available to the City. 1) _ General Obligation Bonds. These are bonds which are backed by the full faith and credit of the local government, and are required to be approved by a voter referendum. Since these bonds are secured by the taxing power of government, they generally offer lower interest rates than other bonds. The revenues IX -11 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions --- Text with strikethrough = deletions) collected from ad valorem taxes on real estate, as well as other sources of revenue are used to service the government's debt. General obligation bonds should be used to fund capital improvements which benefit the whole City rather than specific areas or groups of citizens. CURRENT STATUS: The City currently has no outstanding general obligation bonds. However, the City has $425;000- _ $410 000 in outstanding general obligation notes. 2) Revenue Bonds. The revenue obtained from the issuance of these bonds is normally used to finance publicly owned facilities such as water treatment and wastewater treatment facilities. The charges collected from the users of the facilities are used directly to retire the bond obligations. This basically allows the capital project to be self - supporting. It should be noted that the interest rates generally tend to be higher than those of general obligation bonds. Also, -tThe issuance of the bonds may be approved by the City Council without a voter referendum. CURRENT STATUS: The City has issued several revenue bonds to fund the improvements to its water and wastewater facilities. The bond revenues are deposited into Enterprise Trust Fund accounts for each of the utilities, from which funds are specifically earmarked for a particular project. User charges are then used to service the debt. The total annual debt service on these bonds is as follows: 2040- S 2011- $-525000 11,084,000 2012 - $- -x,000 $1,099,000 2013- $ 585,000 $1,124000 2014 - $-620000 $635,000 2015 $655 000 Total $2,790,000$4,597,000 3) Industrial Revenue Bonds. This type of bond, though issued by a local government, is actually assumed by companies or industries that use these funds to construct facilities. The low interest rates associated with this type of bond (due to their tax exempt status) makes it particularly attractive to IX -12 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions Text with strikethrough = deletions) industry. The advantages to the local government is are that the private sector is responsible for the retirement of the debt and that the new employment opportunities are created in the community. CURRENT STATUS: The City has not issued any Industrial Revenue Bonds. 4. State Sources [9J -5.016 (1)(c), F.A.C.] The City of Edgewater also depends on annual disbursements from the sState government to supplement its revenue sources. The revenue sources discussed above represent those funds generated by City levies which may be collected and disbursed at the local level. The revenue sources discussed in this section represent those funds which are: (1) generated locally, but collected and later reimbursed to the City by the State; (2) adopted as a local option tax or license fee, collected and reimbursed by the State; or (3) shared by the State in the form of grants to the local government, but originate from State general revenues. The amounts available from these sources may vary widely from year to year depending on legislative actions. a. Revenue Sharing Trust Fund This component of revenue consists of 1.075 percent of sales and use tax collections, 12.5 percent of the sState alternative fuel use decal fee collections, and the remainder from the one -cent municipal fuel tax. The sales and use tax collections were substituted for the cigarette tax revenues that previously were used for this fund by the Florida Legislature. The municipal fuel tax funds are restricted for transportation related expenditures. CURRENT STATUS: The City anticipates receiving $3-87-,S45- - 1600 320 this revenue source in the fiscal year -2010_2011. Of this revenue, 63.8% comes from the sales and use tax collections, .4 percent comes from the user decal fee collections, and the remainder (35.8 %) is generated by the one -cent municipal fuel tax. This revenue source is anticipated to account for approximately 34.92% of the City's General Fund revenues in fiscal year - 20102011. b. Other Shared Revenue This category of revenue sources includes several major financial resources which, like the Revenue Sharing Trust Fund, are shared between City, County, and State agencies. IX -13 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) The following taxes and licensing fees generate a large portion of the total annual revenue for the City's General Fund. 1) Sales Tax — The current sales tax in the State is 6 %, and is levied on retail sales, and such things as commercial rentals, admission fees to entertainment facilities, and motor vehicle sales. The collection is returned to the Cities and Counties in accordance with specific formulae. The variables of the formulae, in the case of cities, include the population of the municipality, as well as the total and unincorporated population of the County. CURRENT STATUS: The City's portion of the State sales tax is expected to amount to approximately $851703 $939,188 in fiscal year -24-0 2011, which represents 7.7% of the City's General Fund revenue budget for that year. c. Mobile Home Licenses Mobile Home licenses currently range from $31.60 to $86.60, depending on what time length is established in the rate structure. Each City shares in the allocation of the revenues from this source based on the number of units located in the City. The City in turn shares a portion of the revenue with the local school board. This has proven to be a relatively stable revenue source over time. CURRENT STATUS: The City's share of this revenue source estimated for fiscal year 2010 2011 amounts to approximately $20,-000 - 000 which represents less than 1% of the General Fund revenue budget. d. Local Option Taxes Currently, there are four (4) possible sources of revenue available to the City within this category. All of the funds are generated locally, but the funds are collected and disbursed by the Florida Department of Revenue. The City currently shares in only one (1) of these revenue sources. CURRENT STATUS: The City's share of this revenue source estimated for fiscal year 2010 2011 . is approximately $3945 -12- . 1419 351 which amounts to 3.44% of the City's 20102011 General Fund revenues. e. Alcoholic Beverage License The Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco for the State of Florida administers the issuance of licenses associated with the sale and /or consumption of alcoholic IX -14 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions --- Text with strikethrough = deletions) beverages. The State collects in excess of $37 million annually from this fee. Of this amount, a portion is returned to counties and municipalities as a sState shared revenue. CURRENT STATUS: The City's share of this revenue source is anticipated to amount to approximately $6 __ $7,5 . 00 in fiscal year 201-0 2011 which is less than 1% of the City's General Fund revenues. f. Other Sources of Shared Revenues. The City also receives other shared revenues from both the County and other government agencies. These revenues include the Motor Fuel Tax Rebate, the Federal Excise Tax, and the County Business Tax Receipt fees. CURRENT STATUS: The City's share of these revenues for the fiscal year 2040 2011 are anticipated to amount to: a. Motor Fuel Tax Rebate: $ 10,000 b. County Business Tax Receipt Fees: $ 12,500 c. VOCA Grant $- 35 d. Street Light Maintenance $-206-5 "5 $25 000 e. Other Transportation $- 30 f. PS Manatee Mitigation $--5 11,375 The sum of these revenue sources amounts to less than 1% of the City's fiscal year 2009 2010 2011 General Fund revenues. B C. FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS AND LOANS [9J -5.016 (1)(C), F.A.C.] The system by which fFederal general revenue sharing was formerly provided (U.S. State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972) has been substantially modified. The fFederal funds are now available through allocations to the state agencies which administer and monitor block grants or disbursed by federal agencies as block grants directly to state and local agencies, as well as other eligible organizations and individuals. The purpose of the block grants program is to allow recipients greater freedom in the actual funds, though the funds must still be used for projects in specific categories. Since these funds require the competitive applications be submitted in order to receive an allocation, the grant monies are usually non - recurring and cannot accurately be projected for annual budgeting purposes. A partial list of available fFederal grant sources is shown in Figure 1. Other grants and loans are administered at the sState level, with sState eExecutive dDepartments acting as "pass- through agencies" for federally funded projects. The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) is an IX -15 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) example of a federally funded grant project. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development administers this program and allocates 70% of its CDBG funds to "entitlement communities ", or the larger urban areas. These communities must apply for grants for financing specific projects from a list of eligible activities outlined in Title I statutes. These projects include infrastructure improvements, housing projects, and commercial revitalization. The remaining 30% of the grant funds are allocated to sState pass - through agencies such as the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) in the State of Florida. DCA administers these grants for the same types of projects mentioned previously, but restricts their availability to small cities and counties. In addition to block grants, there are several direct loan programs available at the fFederal level, but their applicability to capital projects is extremely limited. State loans however, are usually available to finance capital projects such as land acquisition for low - income housing. DCA administers loans and grants for these projects to eligible governments through its Bureau of Housing. CURRENT STATUS: The City has received an ECHO a FEMA grant in the amount of $83175 $1,141,257 for -the Hawks - Park -Amphitheater for the replacement of Fire Station as well as a grant from Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in the amount of $24$,04 $96,615 for - lift - station replacement YMCA HVAC replacement , and a grant from the Florida Department of Transportation in the amount of $454 966 for the 30 Street sidewalk. The City's Stormwater Fund has received a grant in the amount of $473,360 $37,750 from St. John's River Water Management District from-Florida Department of Transportation-fFDEM for Eastern Shores stormwater improvements. IX -16 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) Figure 1: Federal Grant Agencies and Program Titles AGENCY TITLE Department of Commerce Public Works and Development Facilities Support for Planning Organizations Public Works Impact Projects Public Telecommunications Facilities Construction and Planning Department of Children & Families Community Health Concerns Department of Housing and Urban Development Housing Development Grants Community Development Block Grant /Entitlement Community Development Block Grant /Small Cities Program Department of Interior Outdoor Recreation: Acquisition, Development, and Planning Urban Park and Recreation and Recovery Program Department of Transportation Urban Mass Transportation Capital Improvement Grants Urban Mass Transportation Technical Studies Grant Environmental Protection State Revolving Loan Fund (DFR) Program Agency Comprehensive Estuarine Management SOURCE: "Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance ", Government Printing office, Washington, D.C. IX -17 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strlkethrough = deletions) E.D. LOCAL POLICIES AND PRACTICES [9J- 5.016 F.A.C.J To guide the location and timing of land development, local policies and practices are used, particularly in support of the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Element. Obviously, sState agencies and water management districts which provide public facilities within the City's jurisdiction may influence these policies and practices. One such influence was found to be generated by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) 5year Transportation Plan. This influence stemmed from the fact that several roadways within the City's jurisdiction are part of the state highway system, and therefore are largely the financial responsibility of the FDOT. Plans for the improvement of some of these roadways may be included in the before mentioned 5year Transportation Plan. However, there are other such roadways not included in the pPlan. Either scenario affects the capacity of the roadways, which in turn affects the level and intensity of development, as well as the degree of financial commitment for which the City must plan. In the absence of improvement plans by FDOT, special provisions may be made when the City desires improvement of a sState road to maintain local levels of service standards. These provisions may include the City expending funds for roadway improvements or providing FDOT with the funds, either of which may be collected through an impact fee. In this section, many of the local practices and policies used by the City are described in terms of their general concept and the circumstances surrounding their use. The policies and practices both used in the past and currently in use are identified. Policies and practices not in use which have the potential for being used by the City are discussed in a later section of the CIE. 1. Level- ofServieeLOS Standards. [9J- 5.016 F.A.C.J Level of ServieeLOS (LOS) standards indicate the degree of service provided, or proposed to be provided by public facilities based on their operational characteristics. Basically, the LOS indicates the capacity per unit of demand for each public facility. Therefore, the LOS is a summary of the existing or desired public facility conditions. Chapter 163, F.S., and Chapter 9J -5, F.A.C., both require LOS standards to be included for all public facilities addressed by local governments in their CP. These LOS standards are to be established for the specific purpose of issuing permits or development orders to ensure that adequate capacity is available and will be maintained in public facilities for future development. LOS standards can eaffect both the timing and location of development by encouraging development of those areas which have public facilities with excess capacity. In addition, development is not allowed unless the needed facilities and services are available. This development and provision of services usually occur in a phased sequence over a period of time. IX -18 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) CURRENT STATUS: The City has adopted formal LOS standards with the completion of their CIP. Therefore, the LOS standards as outlined in the various elements of the CIP have been listed below. Sanitary Sewer: 204 gallons per equivalent residential unit per day Solid Waste: a. ?52.5 pounds per capita per day DrainageStormwater: Level A — No significant street flooding Level B — No major residential yard flooding Level C — No significant structure flooding Level D — No limitation on flooding (Based on 25- year /24 -hour storm event) Potable Water: 204 gallons per equivalent residential unit per day Collector Roadways: LOS D for peak hour volumes Arterial Roadways: LOS D for peak hour volumes Limited Access Road: LOS C Publie-- ransit-Paciii es (Volusia County): I- : - - - - . - - : _ OS- standards Guidelines for Recreational Standards -for Facilities: Facility Unit of Measure Parkland 5 acres /1,000 persons Baseball /Softball 1 field /4,000 persons Basketball Court 1 court /5,000 persons Tennis Court 1 court /3,500 persons Handball /Racquetball Court 1 court /4,000 persons Community Center 1 facility/30,000 persons Multi - Purpose /Soccer 1 field /4,000 persons Shuffle Board Court 1 court /1,500 persons Bocci Ball Court 1 court/ 10,000 persons Volley Ball Court 1 court /5,000 persons Boat Ramps 1 ramp /4,700 persons Bike /Pedestrian Trail 1 mile /4,000 persons Fitness Trails 1/14,000 persons Activities Center 1/15,000 persons Gymnasium N/A IX -19 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions Text with strikethrough = deletions) 2. Capital Improvements Program (CIP) [9J -5.016 (2)(a), F.A.C.] A cCapital ilmprovements pProgram is a plan for capital expenditures to be incurred each year over a fixed period of years to meet anticipated facility improvements and needs. The CIP identifies each capital project or other capital expenditures anticipated by the City, as well as presenting estimates of the resources needed to finance the project. The CIP is designed to be consistent with the CIE of the local CP because it reflects the goals, objectives, and policies of the eElement and its implementation strategy, including the 5year Schedule of Improvements. In addition, the CIP is not restricted to only those public facilities addressed in the CP, as is the CIE. The first year of a CIP becomes the annual capital budget with longer range capital expenditures identified for the 5 -year program. The capital budget encompasses enacting appropriations for those capital projects delineated for the first year of the CIP. The CIP, similar to CIE, is reviewed on an annual basis. CURRENT STATUS: The City is currently preparing a CIP with 5 -year increments, within which are contained annual capital budgets. 3. Impact Fees [9J -5.016 _ (1)(c), F.A.C Impact fees are imposed by many local governments on new developments to offset the costs of new public facilities necessitated by the development. Local government may use this strategy as one method of implementing the CIE. Chapter 163, F.S. includes impact fees as an innovative technique that may be integrated into the land development regulations. Impact fee development is a logical outgrowth of the CIE preparation. A rational basis for developing an impact fee ordinance comes from the assessment of the local government's capital improvement needs and its capability to provide for those needs which is required by Chapter 9J -5, F.A.C. Infill development location and timing may be affected and controlled through the use of impact fees. This is because infill development usually occurs in those areas having capital facilities with excess capacity. If the local government chooses not to recover the costs of capital facilities in underutilized service areas, infill development may be encouraged by the absence of impact fees on developments proposed within those areas. IX -20 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) CURRENT STATUS: The City currently has impact fee resolutions for providing water, wastewater, recreation, Fire and Police services. 4. Utility Service Areas 19J- 5.016 The delineation of utility service areas within a comprehensive plan or CIP may be used to describe areas where local governments intend to provide public facilities and services. When used in conjunction with a CIE and CIP, utility service areas can be used as a tool to coordinate the timing of public facilities and service provision within areas planned for development. Additionally, the following benefits may be the result of using utility service areas: a) Encourage efficient and orderly growth patterns; b) Preserve agricultural and environmentally sensitive areas; and c) Support control on facility extensions CURRENT STATUS: Utility service areas have been included in the Utilities Element of the City's CP, but only for water and wastewater facilities and services. 5. User Charges and Connection Fees j9J -5.016 (1)(c), F.A.C.] User charges are designed to recover the costs of public facilities or services from those who benefit from them. Many areas of local government employ the use of user charges. Monthly sewer charges paying for the operation and maintenance of wastewater facilities as well as retiring debt service on revenue bonds is a good example of user charge usage. This technique may also be applied to transportation, potable water, solid waste, recreation, and parking facilities and services. These charges may be designed to vary, depending on the quantity and location of the services rendered, in order to affect the pace and pattern of development. In other words, the greater the distance from the service area, the higher the user charge. CURRENT STATUS: User charges and connection fees are currently used for wastewater, potable water, solid waste, and recreation facility maintenance. 6. Concurrency Management System. 19J-5.016 (2)(a), F.A.C.] This controls the timing and location of development by conditioning new development approvals on evidence that sufficient facilities and services are present or will be provided in order to maintain adopted LOS standards. In effect, this implements the 1985 Legislative IX -21 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) mandate (Chapter 163, F.S.) that requires public facilities to be available to support the impacts of new development. Therefore, development approval becomes contingent on the ability of local governments to provide facilities and services, and furthermore, may require the development itself to furnish the facilities and services in order to maintain the adopted LOS standards. Additional benefits associated with a Concurrency Management System are as follows: a) Supports the consistency of the CIE with the Future Land Use Element; b) Provides for the orderly expansion of public facilities; c) Stabilizes capital improvement expenditures and taxing structures for capital improvements; and d) Reduces the possibility of damage to the environment from the use of overburdened facilities. Typically, the Concurrency Management System interacts with the development approval process by requiring that all zoning, subdivision, or planned unit development (PUD) approval be granted only upon demonstrated compliance with the system. The building permit stage is another level at which a Concurrency Management System may function. In this context, the Concurrency Management System may control development in areas that are already approved, but not as yet built on, such as pre - platted lands. CURRENT STATUS: The City has developed a Concurrency Management System as part of this eElement. 7. Mandatory Dedication or Fees in Lieu Of. The City may require, as a condition to plat approval, that subdivision developers dedicate a portion of the land within the development to be used for public purposes such as roads, parks, and schools. Dedication may be made to the governing body, or to a private group such as a homeowners association. When a subdivision is of such small scale or topographic conditions that a land dedication cannot reasonably be required, the City may require that the subdivider pay a fee in lieu of dedication which is equivalent to the amount of land that otherwise would have been dedicated by the developer. The fee may be deposited into a separate account for use in the future towards the provision of such facilities. As a result of the public facility provision, the adjacent area benefiting from the initiative would likely become more attractive to development. Therefore, the acquired service potential may be used to encourage growth in desired areas. IX -22 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) CURRENT STATUS: The City currently requires mandatory dedications of land or fees in lieu of. 8. Moratoria. A moratorium, or stop -gap ordinance, is used to temporarily halt or freeze development in an area for a specified period of time on an emergency basis. The ordinance may be imposed on certificate of uses, building permits, development approvals, or governmental services such as potable water connections or wastewater system extensions and /or connections. The moratorium normally is imposed for a "reasonable time" to allow the necessary planning activities to take place pending comprehensive plan preparation, adoption, or amendment. The State of Florida's legal system has found development moratoria to be a valid measure of last resort in the protection of local public health, safety, and welfare when adopted in accordance with applicable procedures. Some other considerations in adopting a moratorium include: a) Determining legal status of existing permit applications and approvals to determine the extent of "vested rights" for those developments approved prior to ordinance adoption; b) Specifying the geographic extent of the moratorium (whether it will be City wide, or limited to specific hazard areas with existing service insufficiencies); and c) Specifying the time frame and conditions under which the moratorium will be imposed. CURRENT STATUS: The City is not currently imposing any moratoria. D.E. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 1. Fiscal Assessment [_9J- 5.016(2)(b), In this section, an examination is made of the City's ability to fund the capital improvements listed in Table 1. The purpose of the examination is to determine whether sufficient revenue will be available using the existing budgeting framework utilized by the City to fund the required improvements at the time when they are needed. The assessment process estimates future revenue receipts which the City will use to fund capital improvements, then balances these revenues against the anticipated capital improvement expenditures. Using this process, it becomes possible to quantify annual revenue surpluses and shortfalls, thereby providing a basis for examining opportunities for IX -23 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions Text with strikethrough = deletions) financing the required capital improvements. The examination of these opportunities is included in the next portion of this section, entitled "Summary and Recommendations ". In addition to the direct cost for capital improvements, this section will review the fiscal impacts of the capital improvements identified in the other CP elements upon the actual operation of the City departments responsible for facility management. This will include costs for additional personnel and routing operation /maintenance activities. It should be noted that this assessment includes only those items planned for in other CP elements. a. Accounting System The accounting system employed by the City records financial transactions in individual accounts called "funds ". Records for each fund provide a complete accounting of fund assets, liabilities, reserves, equities, revenues, and expenditures. The following is a brief description of the funds which the City has established for capital improvement financing. GENERAL FUND: The General Fund is the basic operating fund of the City. It accounts for all revenues and expenditures used to finance the traditional services associated with a municipal government which are not accounted for in other funds. These services include police and fire protection, civil defense, emergency rescue services, street services, parks and recreation, building safety, general administration and any other activity for which a specific special fund has not been created. ENTERPRISE FUND: Enterprise Funds are established to account for the financing of self - supporting municipal activities which render services on a user charge basis to the general public. In the City, the water and sewer utilityies, refuse collection, and stormwater operations are operated as enterprise activities. The significant characteristic of an Enterprise Fund is that the accounting system makes it possible to determine whether the activity is operated at a profit or loss. All reports of Enterprise Funds are self - contained. In this way, creditors, legislators, and the general public can evaluate the performance of the municipal enterprise on the same basis as investor - owned enterprise in the same industry. b. Projected Revenues [9J- 5.016(2)(f), F.A.C.1 The City's tax base was projected to decrease for 20092010 2011, assuming a 3.00% rate of growth for the adjusted taxable value of property (including new construction), as indicated below. The City's assessment ratio is projected to remain stable at 95 %. Table 3 Adjusted Taxable Income Projections IX -24 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions -- Text with strikethrough = deletions) Tax Base 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Adjusted taxable $847,368 $872,789,653 $898,973,343 $925,942,543 income $822 ; 687,956 685,099,203 568,632,338 585,691 603,262,047 621,359,908 SOURCE: City of Edgewater Finance Dept. Ad valorem tax yields were projected assuming the fiscal year 2010 2011 rate of millage and the average annual increase (3.00 %) in adjusted taxable value over the next five years. It should be noted that the five -year average rate for millage amounts to a rate of 6.36 per $1,000 of taxable property value. Table 4: Ad Valorem Tax Yield Projections Tax Base 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Ad Valorem Tax $5 45,271,186 $5,429 $5 Yield $4 4,289,714 3,616,500 3 724,997 3 836 747 3 SOURCE: City of Edgewater Finance Dept. Assume a collection of 95% of the total ad valorem tax billings. Table 3 5 indicates the revenues expected to be available to the City to finance the expenditures and capital improvements for the years 201{0 -2044. 2011- 2015.Revenue projections are based on past trends and anticipated changes in funding sources. These amounts are represented in 2010 dollars. Table 35: Revenue Projections Affecting Capital Improvements 2019 2011 2012 2013 2014 201 FUND General Fund Ad $4,968,598 $5,,117456 $5,271 -85 $5,429,321 $5,592 Valorem $4,289 714 $3 502 $3,724 $3 836,747 $3,951,849 Franchise $992,037 41 798 41- ; 052452 $i ; 084,02626 $1 ; -11 -6 ; 547 Fees $1100,000 $1 122000 $1 440 $1,167 State $1,659,760 $1 ; 709553 41,-760 ; 840 $1,813,665 $4 Shared $1,683,136 11716 $1,751135 $1,786157 $1,821 IX -25 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions -- Text with strikethrough = deletions) Revenues Utility Tax $22 ; 068 ; 697 $2,130,75' $2 ;94,681 $2,260,521 12,-328 $2,050,468 $2,091 $_2 133,307 $2,175,973 $2,219.493 Other $382,278 $39346 $405 -,558 $417, -725 $429,89 -2 $1412,535 $1,440,786 $1,469,601 $ 11,528,973 Subtotal: $10,071,370 $40, 373544 $10,684,716 $11,005,258 $11, 335,05-2 110,535,853 $9,987,564 . 1110,223,480 $10,465,200 $10,712 871 Enterprise Funds: Wastewater $3,842,445 $3,95748 $4,076,450 $4,198,743 $4 $3,331753 13531658 $3,743,558 $3968,1 $4,206 Reclaimed $ 428 $441,321 $454 $468,4-98 $482 ; 244 $350,000 $371 $393,260 $416,856 1441867 Refuse $3,203,972 $3,300,091 $3,399 13,501,067 13 $3,274 13, 250,000 $3,315 00 $3,381,300 $3 448,926 Water $3, 842,445 $3,957 K076 $4,98,743 $4 ; 324,705 $3 253 053 $3 448,236 $3655130 $3,874,438 $4,106,904 Stormwater $4,274,076 $4,31 -2,298 $1 $4 -392, -217 $1,433,984 $1,296 047 9,300,000 $1,326 000 11,352,520 $1 379,570 Net Bond Proceeds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal 11- 2,591,405 112,969,146 $13,358,222 $13,758,968 $14,471737 $11 074 $11,900,894 $12,432,948 112 933,285 $13,583,529 Total $22 $23- ,342,657 $24,042, $ $25,506,789 Revenues $22,040,927 $21888,458 $22,656,428 $23,458,485 $24,296,400 The Enterprise Fund projected revenues for each account include anticipated income from user charges, connection fees, impact fees, assessment receipts, and customer service charges. The revenue projections for wastewater and water user charges and connection fees are based on current individual fee amounts (average monthly charge and connection fees) and projected total service connections. Solid waste user charge revenue projections are based on current average monthly charges also. The amount shown for net bond proceeds represents the use of bond proceeds which are anticipated to be issued for major capital projects. The amounts shown reflect the year when the proceeds are estimated to be encumbered for the project and not the use of the proceeds deposited in the construction fund for financing the project. IX -26 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions --- Text with strikethrough = deletions) c._ Projected Expenditures [9J- 5.0161,2)(_f),F.A.C.] The projected expenditures have been separated into three categories for the purpose of this assessment: (i) scheduled capital improvement project expenditures; (ii) capital improvement debt service expenditures; and (iii) operating cost expenditures. The first category of expenditure represents the direct cost of those capital improvements expected to be incurred annually, those identified by the other CP elements, and those identified by the City's Capita! Improvements Program (in addition to the CIP projects already identified by the other CP elements). Table 46 lists these projected expenditures by Fund for 20-1-0- 2014:.2011- _2015. Table 46: Expenditure Projections for Scheduled Capital Improvements 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 FUND General Fund $156-,490 $59,000 $300000 $300 Annual Capital Expenditures $91,732 $150.000 $300,000 $500.000 $300.000 Enterprise Funds Annual Capital Expenses $3 798,999 55.,895 $8950,900 11- 13 - $2.5000 Water /Sewer $1,505,118 $17,451,225 $6.550,000 $2.400.000 $2,350,000 $-304,380 $3-2.5 -900 $3-50-,000 $35000 $350 Refuse $835.300 $500,000 $250.000 $250,000 $250.000 $680,073 X25-4900 $30 521809 $3000 Stormwater $612,750 $100.000 $200,000 $200,000 $200.000 $4-Alt $6,395 808 $9 X30-990 $12;11004 $930 Total Expenses $3,044,900 $18,201,225 $7,300,000 $3,350,000 $3,100,000 The second category includes the projected expenditures required to meet debt service requirements for outstanding bond issues, as well as planned future bond issues included in the revenue projects in Table 46. The future debt issues are anticipated by the City to IX -27 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) provide monies to fund the reclaimed water improvements as well as various general improvements. In addition to long -term indebtedness, the City utilizes short -term borrowing for minor capital expenditures. Table 5 7 the projected debt service expenditures by Fund. Table 57: Debt Service Expenditure Projections 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 FUND General Fund Special Assess. $85 -3,466 $443410 Enterprise Funds Wastewater $1,627,592 State SRF Loan $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,528,319 $1584,517 Water Other -Outstanding -Debt $4-,304 $1,367,938 $1, 444,286 $4-,723,790 $1,045 Wachovia Series 2009 $570.000 $585,000 $610,000 $635,000 $.655.000 Stormwater Other Outstanding Debt $352 $18,333 The debt service to fund the enterprise component of the CIP program consists entirely of revenue bonds and special assessment bonds. Based on the opinion of the City's Council, this debt does not come under the current charter provisions of the City. With respect to the general debt associated with the General Fund, the current charter requires that the City not incur additional debt of more than .75% of the net taxable ad valorem property value during any forward moving five (5) year period unless such debt was approved by a referendum of eligible voters in a general election. Based on the current Charter provisions, the estimated debt service capacity assuming assessed valuation rates is as follows: IX -28 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) Value for 2410 2011 . $685 099 203 $-82207,956 Charter Limitation at .75% $12,778,058 $ 6,170,460 The final category of expenditures contains the annual operating costs for providing the necessary facility improvements and services to the City's customers. These operating costs consist of the recurring expenses associated with the normal operation of capital facilities such as supplies, maintenance, personnel, and utility costs associated with the assessed capital improvement needs. The operating costs have been assigned to the first year in which they are expected to be incurred based on the schedule of improvement contained in Table 46. Table 6 8 presents the annual operating expenditure of the City for years - -2010- 2014: 2011 -2015. Table 68: Annual Operating Expenditures Millions of Dollars 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 FUND $12 $12473 $12,801 $42 $13-,469 General Fund $12 } 1.97,558 $12100000 $12,342,000 $12,588,840 $12,840,617 Enterprise Fund $8,113,356 $8 96 $8,281,352 $8,366450 $8 Water /Wastewater $8,853,510 $8,800,000 $8,976 000 $9,155 $9,338,630 $3,203,972 $3,236,973 $3,270,314 $3,303,998 $3 Refuse $3,274,221 $3,250 000 1131 5 000 $3,381,300 $3,448,926 $1,274,076 $1, 287, 199 $1 $4 $- 1- ,327,385 Stormwater $1 296 $1,300,000 $1,326,000 $_1,352500 $1,379570 In order to assess the City's capability to fund the necessary capital improvement expenditures, a determination of revenue sufficiency must be made. This capability is shown by finding the difference between the projected annual revenues and expenditures for each fund the City uses to finance the capital improvements. The assessment results are shown in Table 79. IX -29 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions -- Text with strikethrough = deletions) Table 79: Fiscal Assessment No. 1 FUND 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 GENERAL FUND REVENUES $12544,666 $12,673,876 $12 $12 113,069 ; 546 $12,197 558 $12,100.000 $12,342,000 $12,588,840 840 $12,840,617 EXPENDITURES $12544666 $1-2,6-73 11-2 $12,936,302 $13 $12,197558 $12 $12,342000 $12,588_ $12840,617 BALANCE - - - - - - ENTERPRISE FUND WATER/ WASTEWATER REVENUES $8 8-196924 :,281,3 -52 $8566 :,452,826 18 853 510 $8,800,000 14 3 976,000 $9 155 520 $9,338 EXPENSES $8,113,356 $8 -24 $8, 281 - $8 $8,452 $8 853 510 $8,800,000 $8,976 000 $9,155520 $9,338,630 BALANCE - - - - - - REFUSE REVENUES $3 $3-236 $3,270,31-4 1-3 ; 303,998 $3,338,029 $3,274.22.1 $3,250.000 $3,315 000 13,381,300 $3,448926 EXPENSES $3203 $332-36,973 $3270,314 13,303 ; 998 13 ; 338 ; 029 13,274 221 133250,000 $3,315,000 $3381 300 $3 448 926 BALANCE - STORMWATER REVENUES $1,274,076 11,287 -99 11,300,457 $1,31 -3,852 14 11 296,047 $1,300,000 $326,000 $1,352,500 11,379 EXPENSES 11 $1 11 ; 457 11,313 ; 852 $1,327,385 $_1.296,047 $1 300,000 $1,326,000 $1 352 500 X1,379,570 BALANCE - - - - - Included in Table 7 - 9__ are the projected revenues (as previously listed in Table 35) and expenditures (consisting of the sum of the cost and expenditures shown in Tables 46, 57, and 68). Improvement costs for transportation and recreation have been included in the General Fund, improvement costs for wastewater, water, and solid waste are included in the Enterprise Fund, and stormwater improvement costs have been included in the Stormwater Fund. The balance of each fund indicates the difference between the projected revenues and expenditures. Revenue shortfalls for a given year are indicated by a negative balance. IX -30 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) The City uses revenues from both the General and Enterprise Funds to meet annual operating expenses. The General Fund is primarily used for transportation and recreation /park operating services, while the Enterprise Fund is used for the operating costs associated with the Public Works and Utilities Departments. Also- iIncluded in the General Fund are CIP projects associated with paving and drainage—stormwater activities, and expenditure of the Public Works Department. Supplemental funding is provided by the fees collected by the various departments from the persons directly receiving the service. The City-wide millage rate and the Enterprise Fund user charges are reviewed periodically by the City as part of its budgeting process. Adjustments are made in order to ensure that sufficient funds are available to meet expected expenses, including a reserve for contingency funds. In anticipation of future increases in operating costs, the City may desire to adjust the millage rate and /or user charges upward by small increments over a period of several years. This will initially provide additional operating reserves, which can later be used to offset operating expense increases as they occur and allow the City to moderate annual charges in the millage rates and user charges. For example, a one- half -mill-- ($0000§ ) increase -in -- the -ad valorem -t-ax millage- -rate will -generate — approximately $390,613 for the -- anticipated- -2$10 adjusted taxable-value of $822,687 In addition tThe following- anticipated increases in ad valorem tax revenues ceuld- -result - for 2 040 -2014 2011 -2015 are featured below in Table 10. Table 10: Anticipated Increase in Ad Valorem Tax Revenue Projections Tax Base 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Result of one -half mill increase $5 $5,519,987 $5,685,587 $5,856,155 $6 0M,839 $4 290,040 $3,438,378 $3,541,529 1.3 647,775 $3 757,_208 d. Summary and Recommendations Within this section, the projected revenue shortfalls as indicated in Table 7 9 are identified. Various methods of overcoming these revenue shortfalls are examined herein, and recommendations developed as to the most appropriate methods of balancing the revenue and expenditure streams for the City's funds. These balanced revenue /expenditure streams are shown in Table 7- -9_ and indicate the achievement of an economically feasible comprehensive plan. IX -31 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) General Fund: As shown in Table 79, the General Fund is projected to have a balanced budget during-2010- 20142-011 -2015. Enterprise Fund: The Enterprise Fund is projected to a balanced budget duringshowing revenue shortfalls -for- the years 2010 - 2014 -2015. These- revenue shortfalls are primarily-due -to -the-improvements tc3- and-expansion of the£- is- storrnwater system. The balancing of the projected revenue and expenditure streams within the Enterprise Fund recommended will be accomplished by the following funding strategy changes: STORMWATER: 1. Apply for various grants from sState agencies to assist with various projects; 2. Obtain short term financing via low interest loans; and 3. Carry forward any unexpected funds as revenue. In the event that some of the proposed sources are not attained, the following alternative strategies will be pursued; 1. Additional deferral of projects to later years; 2. Procurement of additional revenue bonds instead of funding projects on a "pay -as- you-go" basis; 3. Procurement of additional grant funding; 4. Procurement of a state revolving fund loan; and 5. Increase user fees for municipal services. Additionally;- improved planning and coordination will be initiated among the City's utility departments in order to ensure that public facility and service provision is optimal for cost effectiveness. For example, department representatives will work together to encourage the provision of public facilities and services concurrently (where feasible), in order to limit the negative impacts of separate installation (i.e. construct water /sewer services prior to paving /drainagestormwater improvements). Also, other entities which share facilities with the City (such as FDOT and Volusia County) sharing the use of the U.S.- highway--No. 1 within the City limit(s) will be coordinated with regarding improvements to their shared facilities. IX -32 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) Table 8: Fiscal A sses8mcn` No. 2 FUND 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 GENERAL -FUND REVENUES $13,547 $13,850,973 $14,266,503 $14,694,498 $15,135,333 EXPENDITURES $13,547,547 $13,850,973 $14, "� 503 $- 1-4,6944.98 $15,135,333 BALANCE $ $ -$ — - ENTERPRISE FUND WATER /WASTEWATER ��, REVENUES $ 9,841,814 $q 0,,137,068 $ 10,441,180 4 10,754,-44 -6 $ 11,077,048 EXPENSE -S $ 9,841,814 $-10,137 $ 10,441,1 -80 $ 10,754,41 -6 $ 11,077,048 BALANCE $ - - $ - - - REFUSE REVENUES $ - 2;374,046 $-- 3 $ 3,160,470 $ 3,255,284 4- - 3,352,943 EXPENSES $ 2,979,046 $ - 3,068,417 $ 3,160,470 $ 3,255,284 $-- 3,352,943 BALANCE $ - -$ - — $ - STORMWATER REVENUES $ 1,444,601 $ 1,48 -7,939 $ L332,577 $ 1,1- 82;377 $ 1,197 EXPENSES $ 1,444,601 $ - 1,487,939 - 1,332577 $- 1,182,577 $ 1,197,457 BALANCE $ $— - -$ $ $ IX -33 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) E.F. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES The City shall undertake all actions necessary to ensure that needed public facilities and services are provided to all residents within the City's jurisdiction in a manner which maximizes the use of existing facilities, promotes orderly compact urban growth, and protects the City's investments in its existing facilities. GOAL 1: Capital improvements will be provided to correct existing deficiencies, to accommodate projected future growth, and to replace obsolete or worn-out facilities, as indicated in the 5year Schedule of Improvements delineated in this eElement. Objective 1.1: Reserving Funds for Needed Future Capital Facilities. Ensure that Aa Five -Year Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) shall be incorporated into the Annual Budget in order to reserve funds for needed future capital facilities. Policy 1.1.1: Preparation of the Five-year Capital Improvement Program. The City's Finance Director shall prepare the Five -Year C- apitcr CIP on an annual basis as part of the City's Annual Budget: it shall address all capital needs of the City. [91- 5.016(3)(c)3. and (3)(c)7., F.A.C.] Policy 1.1.2: Municipal Department Heads and the CIE Annual Update. As a part of the annual update process for the Capital Improvements Element, municipal department heads shall provide input to the City Manager and Finance Director regarding capital improvement needs and the adequacy of existing and planned funding sources. Policy 1.1.3: Multiyear Funding Strategy and New Funding resources_ As a part of the annual update process for the Capital Improvements Element the City shall focus on a multi -year funding strategy to identify new funding resources. Objeetive-14:Objective 1.2: Capital Improvements Classification. The City sShall include all projects identified in the CP which are determined to be of relatively large scale and high cost ($25,000 or greater) in the 5year Schedule of Improvements as capital improvement projects; all other capital improvements shall be included in the 5year eCapital Ilmprovements pProgram and annual capital budget. Policy 1.2.1: Debt Service and Operating Expenditures. The City shall, for accounting purposes, also - include this Element in conjunction with Debt Service and Operating expenditures. IX -34 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) Policy 1.1.2:Policy 1.2.2_ Scheduling and Capital The City shall, as a matter of priority, schedule and fund all capital improvements identified by the 5year Schedule of Improvements. Policy 1.1.3:Policy 1.2.3: Reviewing_ the Water Supply _ Facilities Work Plan (WSFWP). The City shall continue to adopt a Capital Improvements Program CIP and annual budget as a part of its budgeting process. The City will review the Capital 4mprovements-- Prvgnrm- CIP annually together with the Water Facilities Supply Work PlanWSFWP to include the water related projects identified for the first five years of the - Work PlanWSF1WP. The program shall be "financially feasible" as defined in Florida Statutes. (9j- 5.016(3)(c)(1)a. and (3)(c)7.,F.A.C.1 Policy 1.L.4:Policy 1.2.4: Improvement Projects and Priority Guidelines. The proposed capital improvement projects shall be evaluated and ranked in order of priority according to the following guidelines: • whether the project is needed to protect public health and safety, to fulfill the City's legal commitment to provide facilities and services, to reduce waste of water resources, to reduce waste of water resources, or to preserve or achieve full use of the existing facilities;49J_5.016 (3)(c)(1)a., F.A.C. • whether the project promotes the City's development of alternative water supplies, corrects water supply deficiencies or otherwise results in a reduction in future dependence on Upper Floridian aquifer water sources to support future growth of the City. • whether the project increases the efficiency of use of the existing facilities, prevents or reduces future improvement costs, provides service to developed areas lacking full service, or promotes infill development; andJ2J 5.0 (3)(c)(1)b., F.A.C. • whether the project represents a logical extension of facilities and services within a designated utility service area; • whether the project implements the policies of the this Comprehensive Plan as they pertain to the concurrency requirements; and IX -35 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) • whether the project is financially feasible. [9J -5.016 (3)(c)(1)f.. F.A.C.] Objective 1.2:Objective 1.3: Proportionate Share. Ensure Tthe proportionate share of facility improvements which are necessitated by future development in order to maintain adopted LOS standards shall be borne by those directly benefiting from the improvements. [9J -5.016 (3)(b)4., F.A.C.] Policy-- 1.2.1:Policy 1.3.1: Implementing Impact Fee Programs. The City shall continue to implement its impact fee programs as conditions to providing utility services to new developments. [9J -5.016 (3)(c)(1)e., F.A.C.] Policy 1.2.2:Policy 1.3.2: Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance. The City has -shall continue to implemented its a tTransportation iImpact €Fee ()Ordinance. Policy 1.3.3: Future Development and Proportionate Costs. Future development will bear a proportionate cost of all capital improvements necessary to maintain LOS standards adequately. [9J- 5.016(3)(c)8., Policy 1.3.4: Private Contributions and the Five -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. The City shall rely upon private contributions as a funding source within the Fiveyear Schedule of Capital Improvements only when the obligation to fund a specific capital improvement is addressed in an enforceable development agreement or development order. The City shall not be responsible for funding capital improvements that are the obligation of the developer. If the developer fails to meet any capital improvement commitment that is programmed in the Fiveyear Schedule of Capital Improvements, a plan amendment to delete the capital improvement from the Schedule shall be required. [9J -5.016 (3)(c)(1)e., F.A.C.1 Policy 1.3.5: New Development and Impact Fees. All new development, which a direct or indirect impact on roads, schools, parks, potable water, or sewer, shall continue to be subject to impact fees collected and /or administered by the City. Monies collected as impact fees shall be spent to benefit the City's infrastructure. [9J- 5.016 (3)(c)(1)e., F.A.C.] Objective -La Objective 1.4: Managing Financial Resources. The City wWill manage its financial resources to ensure the provision of needed capital improvements for previously issued development orders for future development and redevelopment. [9J -5.016 (3)(b)5.. F.A.C.1 IX -36 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX _ 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions -- Text with strikethrough = deletions) Policy 1.3.1:Policy 1.4.1: Issuance of Development Orders or Permits and Concurrenc , The City will not issue development orders or permits unless public facilities (which meet the adopted level of serviceLOS standards) needed to support development or redevelopment are available, or will be available concurrently with the impacts of the development. [9J -5.016 (3)(c)(1)e., F.A.C.] Policy 1.3.2:Policy 1.4.2 Maximum Ratio of Outstanding Indebtness. The maximum ratio of outstanding indebtedness (for providing capital improvements) to the property tax base shall be limited by the City to no 0 greater than .75%. [9J -5.016 (3)(c)(2), F.A.C.] Policy 1.3.3:Policy 1.4.3: Adoption of the Capital Improvements Program. The City shall continue to adopt a 5year cCapital i_Improvements pProgram and annual budget as a part of its budgeting process. [9J -5.016 (3)(c)7.. F.A.C.] Policy 1.4.4: Funding to Finance Capital Improvements. The City will continue to apply for water, wastewater, solid waste, and other available grants on an annual basis to obtain funding to finance the provision of capital improvements. [9J- 5.016 (3)(c)(1)c., F.A.C.] Policy 1.4.5: Limitation on the use of Revenue Bonds. The limitation on the use of revenue bonds as a percent of total debt shall follow applicable Florida statues and acceptable financial practices. [9J -5.016 (3)(c)(2)a., Policy 1.4.6: Maximum Ratio of Total Debt Service. The maximum ratio of total debt service to total revenue shall follow applicable Florida statues and acceptable financial practices. [9J -5.016 (3)(c),(2)b., F.A.C.] Policy 1.4.7: Maximum Ratio of outstanding Capital Indebtedness to Property Tax Base. The maximum ratio of outstanding capital indebtedness to property tax base shall follow applicable Florida statues and acceptable financial practices. [9J- 5.016(3)(c)(2)c., F.A.C.]. Policy 1.4.8: Reviewing all Sources of Revenue and the Annual Budget Process. Before the annual budget process is initiated, the City shall review all sources of revenue not previously utilized as revenue and shall act to obtain and receive revenue from these potential sources where a benefit to the City can be predicted. IX -37 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions -- Text with strikethrough = deletions) Policy 1.4.9: Complying with State Law and the Management of Debt. The City shall comply with all State of Florida law the management of debt. [9j- 5.016(3)(c)(1)a. (3)(c)(1)b., and (3)(c)(1)c., F.A.C]. Objective 1.4:Objective 15 Issuance of Development Orders and Permits. The City sShall base all decisions regarding the issuance of development orders and permits on the coordination of the development requirements included in this CP, its land development regulations and ordinances, and the availability of public facilities needed to support such development at the time it is needed. [9J- 5.016 F.A.C.] Policy L.4.i:Polic1.5.1 Level of ScrviccLOSStandards. The City shall use the following LOS standards in reviewing the impacts of new development and redevelopment upon public facility provision in the City or in the City's Utility Service Area f9j- 5.016(3)(c)4_ F.A.CA: Sanitary Sewer: 204 gallons per equivalent residential unit per day Solid Waste: 2T-752.5 pounds per capita per day Drainage: Stormwater Level A — No significant street flooding Level B — No major residential yard flooding Level C — No significant structure flooding Level D — No limitation on flooding (Based on 25- year /24 -hour storm event) Potable Water: 204 gallons per equivalent residential unit per day Collector Roadways: LOS D for peak hour volumes Arterial Roadways: LOS D for peak hour volumes Limited Access Road: LOS C Public —T : ; •.:: - • •. : :. - -.): - -- In proccss of establishing LOS Standards. Guidelines for Recreational Standards for Facilities: Facility Unit of Measure Parkland 5 acres/ 1,000 persons Baseball /Softball 1 field /4,000 persons Basketball Court 1 court /5,000 persons Tennis Court 1 court /3,500 persons Handball /Racquetball Court 1 court /4,000 persons IX -38 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) Community Center 1 facility/30,000 persons Multi- Purpose /Soccer 1 field /4,000 persons Shuffle Board Court 1 court /1,500 persons Bocci Ball Court 1 court /10,000 persons Volley Ball Court 1 court /5,000 persons Boat Ramps 1 ramp /4,700 persons Bike /Pedestrian Trail 1 mile /4,000 persons Fitness Trails 1/14,000 persons Activities Center 1/15,000 persons Gymnasium N/A Policy 1.4.2:Policy L5.2: New Development, Redevelopment, or Comprehensive Plan Amendments Guidelines. The City shall evaluate all proposed CP amendments and requests for new development or redevelopment according to the following guidelines as to whether the proposed action would: • contribute to a condition of public hazard as described in the Utilities Sub- Eelementr, f91- 5.016 (3)(c)(1)a., F.A.C.1 • exacerbate any existing condition of public facility capacity deficits as described in the Utilities Sub- Eelementr, the Transportation Element, and the Recreation and Open Space Element; [9J -5.016 (3)(c)(1)b., F.A.C.1 • generate public facility demands that may be accommodated by capacity increases planned in the S year Schedule of Improvementr, • conform with to future land uses as shown on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), and utility service areas as described in the Utilities Sub- Eelementr, • if public facilities are developer - provided, accommodate public facility demands based on adopted LOS standards; • if public facilities are provided, in part or whole, by the City, demonstrate financial feasibility, subject to this element; and • represent a logical extension of facilities and service fmth City to the urban fringe, or is compatible with the plans of thesState agencies or the St. johns River Florida Water Management District IX -39 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions -- Text with strikethrough = deletions) (SJRWMD)_ and watcr management -- districts' facilities- plans:; and [9J -5.016 (3)(c)(1)g.. F.A.C.1 • determination of future capital improvement needs shall be based on anticipated future growth or redevelopment patterns and whether a particular improvement advances the goals, policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. [4 (c)1.b., (3) (c)1.d., (3) (c)1.e, and (3)(c)9., F.A.C.] Policy 1.5.3: Land Use Development Orders and Concurrency. Land use development . orders shall be granted only when facilities functioning at the adopted level of servieeLOS exist, or will be available, concurrent with occupancy or use of such _ developed land with respect to sewer, water and-drainage stormwater, and within three years for recreation and transportation. [9J -5.016 3t(c)5., F.A.C.] Policy 1.5.4: Public and Private Capital Facilities and Lcvel of ScrviccLOS Provision. The City shall require all public and private capital facilities to operate and provide service at the level of servieeLOS adopted in this Comprehensive Plan for existing, previously issued development orders and future permitted development. [9J- 5.016(3)(c)5. and (3)(c)6.. F.A.C.] Policy 1.5.5: Public Facilities and Services and Concurren_c. The City shall continue to make public services and facilities available concurrent with the impacts of development. In cases of phased development, the City shall determine when public facilities and services are necessary to maintain concurrency. [9J-5.016 (3)(c)6., F.A.C.1 Objective 1.5:Ob}ecti 1.6: Coastal High Hazard Area. By December 2014, Tthc City sShall amend its Land Development Code to limit the size and density of developments in the coastal high hazard area, as defined by the Coastal Management Element. Policy 1.5.1 :Policy 1.6.1: Constructing Facilities and the Coastal High - hazard Area. The City will not construct public facilities east of U.S. Highway 1 unless no other feasible sites are available outside the coastal high- hazard area. Where it becomes necessary to construct public facilities in the coastal high- hazard area, the design of the facilities will incorporate flood proofing and additional structural support in order to ensure minimum damage from storms and hurricanes. [9J -5.016 (3)(c)(1)a., F.A.C.1 IX -40 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) Poliey- 5.2:Policy 1.6.2: Limiting Public Expenditures and the Coastal High - hazard Area_The City will limit public expenditures that subsidize development in coastal high- hazard areas except for the restoration and enhancement of natural resources. Objective 1.7: Adoption of Local Government and External Plans. To aAdopt all applicable outside local government and external agency plans necessary to maintain and provide for level of servieeLOS. Policy 1.7.1: Meeting School Capacity and Student Demands. The City hereby adopts by reference the Volusia County School District's Facilities 5 -Year Work Program to meet anticipated school capacity and student demands projected by the County and municipalities based on the adopted Level of- ServiceLOS standards for public schools. [9J- 5.016 (3)(c)(1)g,,. F.A.C.J Policy 1.7.2: Meeting Demand of State Transportation Facilities. The City hereby adopts by reference the Florida Department of Transportation's 5- Year Work Program to meet anticipated demand through improvement of State transportation facilities within the jurisdiction. [9J -5.016 (3)(c)(1)g., F.A.C.J Policy 1.7.3: Meeting Water Supply Demand and Needs. The City hereby adopts by reference the St. Johns River Water Management (SJRWMD) Water Supply Plan 2005 to meet anticipated water supply and demand needs within the jurisdiction. [9J -5.016 (3)(c)(1)g., F.A C4 GOAL 2: Provide for a financially feasible public school facilities program. Objective 2.1: Level OQf Service Standards. The City sShall ensure that the capacity of schools is sufficient to support residential subdivisions and site plans at the adopted level of servieeLOS standard. This level of scrviccLOS standard shall be consistent with the level of servieeLOS standard adopted in the interlocal agreement entered into by the School Board and the local governments within Volusia County. [9J -5.016 (3)(b)3.. F.A.C.J Policy 2.1.1: Applying Level f S rviceLOS _ Standards. The level of scrviccLOS standard adopted by the City shall be applied consistently by all local governments within Volusia County and by the School Board district - wide to all schools of the same type. [91- 5.016 (3)(c)(1)f., F.A.C.1 Policy 2.1.2: Florida Inventory of School House r ° °, °� LOS Standards. Consistent with the interlocal agreement, the uniform, district -wide level - ef-serviceLOS standards are set as follows using FISH (Florida Inventory IX -41 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions --- Text with strikethrough = deletions) of School House) capacity based on the traditional school calendar 49J- 5.016 (3)(c_14., F.A.C.]: • Elementary Schools: 115% of permanent FISH capacity for the concurrency service area.; • K- 8 Schools: 115% of permanent FISH capacity for the concurrency service area.; • Middle Schools: 115% of permanent FISH capacity for the concurrency service area; • High Schools: 120% of permanent FISH capacity for the concurrency service area; and • Special Purpose Schools: 100% of permanent FISH capacity. Policy 2.1.3: Level-of Scr for Specific Schools in Volusia County.. The following schools shall achieve the adopted level -o€ - serviceLOS on or before the identified date. The level of scrviceLOS presented in the following table is the tiered level of scrviccLOS that shall apply to that school unit the date noted in the table. [9J -5.016 (3)(c)4.. F.A.C.] School LOS DATE Orange City Elementary 117% July 1, 2012 Horizon Elementary 158% July 1, 2012 Freedom Elementary 126% July 1, 2012 Osceola Elementary 117% July 1, 2012 Ortona Elementary 150% July 1, 2012 Ormond Beach Elementary 116% July 1, 2012 Southwestern Middle 120% July 1. 2013 New Smyrna Beach Middle 122% July 1, 2014 (Note: This policy designates a tiered LOS for those schools that exceed the desired levels at the end of the (Five- year eCapital ilmprovements pProgram.) Objective 2.2: School Capital Facilities Planning. The City sShall cooperate with the School Board to ensure existing deficiencies and future needs are addressed consistent with adopted level of serviceLOS standards for public schools. f9J- 5.016 _)1. and (3)(b)3., F.A.C.] IX -42 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions -- Text with strikethrough = deletions) Policy 2.2.1: Reviewing the School Board's Annual Work Program. The City ' • - five-year annually cach Scptcmbcr as part of the overall- . The City shall review the School Board's annual work program to verify that it is financially feasible and will maintain the lcvcl of scrviccLOS standards by the end of the five -year period. [9J -5.016 (3)(c)(1)g., F.A_C.] Policy 2.2.2: Future Development Proportionate Costs and Public Schools. The City shall coordinate with the sSchool bBoard and adopt development conditions to ensure that future development pays a proportionate share of the costs of capital facility capacity needed to accommodate new development and to assist in maintaining the adopted lcvcl of scrviccLOS standards via impact fees and other legally available and appropriate methods.[9J -5.016 (3)(c)8., F.A.C.1 GOAL 3: Establish . a redevelopment plan and research the possibility of creating a Community Redevelopment Area in the City. Objective 3.1: Redevelopment Plan and Community Redevelopment Area. The -City shall aAmend the Capital Improvements Element to include in the annual budget process funds to develop a redevelopment plan or conducting a feasibility study on creating a Community Redevelopment Area (CRA). Policy 3.1.1: Feasibility of Implementing a Redevelopment Plan, The City shall review the feasibility of implementing a Redevelopment Plan through funds established in the Capital Improvements Program. The Plan shall include at minimum, the establishment of architectural standards, community appearance standards, or both, for residential and non- residential properties within the redevelopment areas; and recommendations for the potential revision or amendment of provisions of the City's Land Development Code. Policy 3.1.2: Feasibility of Implementing a Community Redevelopment Area. The _ - City shall _ review feasibility of implementing a Community ' - - - :: - - -, (CRA) through funds established in the Capital Improvements Program. The CRA Plan shall include at minimum, recommendations for the creation of districts zones within the boundaries of . the City's CRA, the establishment of architectural standards, . community appearance standards, or both, for residential and non - residential properties within the CRA; and recommendations for the IX -43 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethreugh = deletions) potential revision or amendment of provisions of the City's Land Development Code. Policy 3.1.3: Creating a Redevelopment Advisory Board. The City shall create an advisory board to provide guidance on projects and plans established in the Redevelopment Plan or ____,____ RA Pl n upon adoption of the plans established in Policies 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 of this Element. Policy 3.1.4: Seeking Innovative Financial Strategies. The City shall seek innovative financial strategies such as Tax Increment Financing (FIF) to fund redevelopment projects within the City. Policy 3.1.5: Establishing Incentives to Developers oflnfill and Redevelopment Projects. The City shall establish incentives, such as density bonuses, expedited permitting, reduction in impact fees, reducing or eliminating parking requirements, providing tax incentivesor creating an area -wide stormwater facility to minimize onsite detention and retention infrastructure, to developers of infill and redevelopment projects within the proposed areas established in Policies 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 of this Element. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE (5 -YEAR) As shown in TABLE Table 911, the Five (5) Year Schedule of Improvements is the mechanism by which the City can effectively stage the timing, location, projected cost, and revenue sources for the capital improvements derived from all the CP elements, in support of the Future Land Use Element. This 5- Year Schedule of Improvements has been used to document the "economic feasibility" of the City's CP, based upon the preceding sections of this eElement entitled "Capital Improvements Inventory", "Financial Analysis ", and "Goals, Objectives, and Policies ". LONG TERM TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS Table 10-12 describes transportation improvements that the City anticipates may be necessary within a ten (10) year time frame. Table 911: City of Edgewater Five Year Schedule of Improvements Fiscal Years Ending 2010 -2014 2011 -2015 IX -44 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) Project Schedule Cost Revenue Source LOS Non - LOS FINANCE DEPARTMENT YMCA HVApgrade 2011 $96,615 Capital Fund R Council Chamber Bathroom Renovations 2011 162,250 Capital Fund R PUBLIC SAFETY: (Fire /Rescue) Vehicle Replacement 2010 -20144 $--- 590 General -Fund P. 12 Lead/ EKC Monitor 2013 $— 25 Gencral Fund R Genesis Extrication Tool System 2012 $ - 30 General -Fund R Self Contained- Breather- Apparatus 201-3 $ 10000 General -Fund R Station 55 replacement 2011 $2,060 357 Capital Fund R PUBLIC SAFETY: (Police) Vehicle Replacement 20092M-2044 $--41-4 General Fund R LEISURE SERVICES: Vchicic Rcplaccmcnt 2010 2014 $ 296 General Fund R Kennedy Park RennovationsRenovations Phase II 2013 $ 290,000 Capital Fund N Dog Park 2013 $ 50,000 Capital Fund N Mango Lake Park 2013 $ 500,000 Capital Fund N ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES: Vehicle Rcplaccment 20 10 -2014 $ 2,694 Water & Scwcr Fund R Retrofit Lift Station 1,2,13 20 10 -2041 $ 35-3 Water & Scwcr Fund R SE- Storage Ta 'pump Station 2010 $ 353;000 Water- -& Scwcr Fund N Western Storage -rank & Pump Station 2011 $ 130 Developer N • • ._" ' ' - - :: :. - - ent 2011 $- 3;000;000 SRF & Developer R WWTP, building, printing. survey. geotech 2011 $314,800 N 2.5 MGD Wastewater Treatment Plant 2011 2013- 2014 $15,000,000 SRF & Developer N SE Service Area Reclaimed Improvements 201-1 2013 $ 5,000,000 SRF & Impact Fees N Ammeniators WFP 2010 $ —25 Water & -Sewer Fund R $ 2,300,000 Wells 21 -24 and raw water mains 20142015 $4,600,000 Developer N ART Wclls 17,18,19,20 204-0 $- 4 Water & Scwcr Fund N :: meat 204-0 $-1-50 Water lc Scwcr Fund R $---- 50 Replacement of 2" Water Lines 2012_2015 2014 $200,000 Water & Sewer Fund R W tern D cclaimcd -Water- -Main Extension 2011 $ 3,- 500 SRF &- Developer N $- 270,00 Sliplining existing pipes- Wildwood Sub. 2011 2013 $125,000 Stormwater Fund R IX -45 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) Project Schedule Cost Revenue Source LOS Non - LOS Eastern- Shores - Project 201-0 $ 680,073 Stormwater Fund N Water Line Enhancement 2011 $100,000 N Reclaimed Water Storage Project 2011 $100,000 N Reclaim Water Improvements 2011 $50,000 N Claricone Painting 2011 $150 , 000 N RTU Upgrades 2011 $30,000 R Sliplining Sewers 2011 $200,000 R Lift Station 1 Rehab 2011 $150,000 R Engineering study for color & DBP 2011 $20,000 N Unforeseen Projects 2011 $261,353 Reclaimed Water Line E xtensions 2012 $50,000 N Reuse Pump Station 2012 $3 N Sludge hand, emergency. power, lab 2012 $750.000 N Contract Administration 2012 $375.725 N 10% project contingency bid 2012 $418,500 N Barscreen and headworks 2012 $250,000 N Influent Pump Station 2012 $300,000 N Internal recycle pump station 2012 $175,000 N BTU Train #1 & #2 2012 $500,000 N Chlorine, S02, and Alum Feed 2012 $330,000 N Clarifiers & WAS pumping 20_12 $435,000 N Third Clarifier Building 2012 $800,000 N Filters 2012 $30,000 N CL2 Contract 2012 $28.5,000 N Educational Component Eastern Shores 2011 $37,750 N Pearl St. Stormwater Improvement Project 2011 $150,000 N IIt Avenue CIP Project 2_0_13 $650,000 N Lamont St. and Riverside Dr. CIP Project 2012 $250.000 N East Palm Way & Riverside D ,CIP Proiect 2014 $250,000 N Eurgot Ave. & Riverside Dr. CIP Project 2015 $225,000 N PUBLIC WORKS: 2010 -291 -4 $- 2,077,000 Road Repaving 2011 -2015 $2,150,282 Capital Fund R Signalize SR 442 @ I -95 SB Ramp 2012 $ 287,546 Developer N $ 157,716 30th Street Sidewalk 2011 $606,619 Capital Fund N Indian River Blvd. Extension (approx. 1 mile) 2011 2012 $ 4,604,160 Developer N LEGEND: R- REPLACEMENT, N- NEW, E- EXPANDED Table 101312: Long Term (10 year) Transportation Improvements IX -46 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) Williamson Blvd. Extension (four lanes) Indian River Blvd. Extension (four lanes) Signalize S.R. 442 at I -95 southbound ramps Signalize S.R. 442 at I -95 northbound ramps S.R. 442 at I -95 lane additions Future Transit Corridor (Williamson Blvd. extension) U.S. 1 widening (six lanes between S.R. 442 and Riverside Dr.) PROGRAM MONITORING AND EVALUATION The role of monitoring and evaluation is vital to the effectiveness of any planning program and particularly to the CIE. This is largely because the City's revenue and expenditure streams are subject to fluctuations in the market and the economy. It is the behavior of these streams which will be used to predict fiscal trends in order to maintain the City's adopted LOS standards for public facilities. Therefore, the CIE requires a continuous program for monitoring and evaluation, pursuant to Chapter 163, F.S., this eElement will be reviewed on an annual basis to ensure that required fiscal resources are available to provide public facilities as necessary to support the adopted LOS standards. The annual review will be the responsibility of the local planning agency, and the City Finance Director and City Manager will serve as advisory members at all formal deliberations related to capital improvement monitoring and evaluation. The local planning agency's finding and recommendations will be presented to the City Council at a public meeting. The City Council will direct staff to take any actions deemed appropriate based on the findings and recommendations of the local planning agency. The review will include the following considerations, plus an examination of these considerations in order to determine their continued appropriateness: • Any corrections, updates, modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the element; or the date of construction of any facility enumerated in this eElement; • The CIE's consistency with the CP eElements and its support of the Future Land Use Element; FLUE, • The City's ability to provide public facilities and services within the utility service area in order to determine any need for boundary modification or adjustment; • The priority assignment of existing public facility deficiencies; • The City's progress in meeting those needs determined to be existing deficiencies; • The criteria used to evaluate capital improvement projects in order to ensure that projects are being ranked in their appropriate order of priority; IX -47 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions --- Text with strikethrough = deletions) • The City's effectiveness in maintaining its adopted LOS standards; • The City's effectiveness in reviewing the impacts of plans and programs of sState agencies and water management districts that provide public facilities within the City's jurisdiction; • The effectiveness of impact fees for assessing new development a pro rata share of the improvement costs which they generate; • The impacts of special districts and any regional facility and service provision upon the City's ability to maintain its adopted LOS standards; • The ratio of outstanding indebtedness to the property tax base; • Efforts made to secure grants and /or private funds, whenever available to finance the provision of capital improvements; • The transfer of any unexpected account balances; • The criteria used to evaluate proposed plan amendments and request for new development or redevelopment; and • Capital improvements needed for the latter part of the planning period, for inclusion in the 5-Year Schedule of Improvements. In addition to the annual Capital Improvements Element review mentioned above, each request for a development order will be reviewed by a Technical Review Committee, as designated by the City Manager, and other appropriate personnel for the purpose of establishing whether the various adopted lcvcl-- of— servieeLOS standards will be adversely impacted if development is allowed to proceed. No development order will be issued if it is determined that the public facilities needed to maintain the adopted level oc sc_ ~ccLOS standards will not be available concurrently with the impact of the development. Further, issuance of development orders will be delayed until the correction of existing system deficiencies which are required to increase the lcvcl of scrviccLOS provided to the adopted standard are complete. IX -48 ) 0 , uv ), 4 i City of ILED G E WA TER r, Inc. 1951 .� , trALert CITY OF EDGEWATER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SUB - ELEMENT EFFECTIVE TBD CHAPTER IX CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB - ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) CHAPTER IX CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB - ELEMENT A. PUBLIC FACILITIES, CAPACITIES AND LEVEL -OF- SERVICE (LOS) INVENTORY FOR CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT The following inventories shall be maintained by the City to be used for the concurrency assessment of new development. 1. Transportation: • Design capacity of different roadway types. • The existing level- o€- servieeLOS measured by the p.m. peak hour directional trips. • The status of service degradation of those roads classified as backlogged based on the methodology described in the Transportation Element of this Plan. • The adopted 'e- el- o -servieeLOS standards for all roadway types. • The existing capacities or deficiencies of the roadway network. • The improvements to be made to the roadway network in the current fiscal year by the City, Volusia County, the Florida Department of Transportation, or other public agency and the impact of such improvements on the existing capacities or deficiencies. 2. Sanitary Sewer: • The capacity of the wastewater treatment facilities. The existing 'ems 1-o servieeLOS standards measured by the average number of gallons per day /per unit based on the average flow experienced at the treatment plant and the total number of equivalent residential units within the service area. • The adopted Ieve o` servieeLOS standards for average daily flow per equivalent residential unit. CM -1 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB - ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) • The existing deficiencies of the system. • The reserve capacities. 3. Potable Water: • The design capacity of potable water treatment facilities. • The existing level -air se viceLOS measured by the average number of gallons per day per unit based on the average flows experienced and the total number of equivalent residential units within the service area. • existing potable water storage capabilities of the water system. • The adopted 1eve of s r ieeLOS standards for the potable water facility components. • The existing capacities or deficiencies of the system. • The reserved capacities. 4. Solid Waste Disposal: • __The design capacity of solid waste disposal facilities. • The existing Ieve of s LOS. • The adopted level- o €- servieeLOS standard for solid waste. • _ The projected capacities or deficiencies. 5. Stormwater Drainage: • The existing level o` -crviccLOS measured by storm event as determined by the City and its Consulting Engineers. • The adopted 'eve' or rviceLOS standard for stormwater drainage quantity and quality. CM -2 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB - ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions --- Text with strikethrough = deletions) 6. Recreation and Open Space: • _The existing acreage of parkland and the existing number of recreation facilities as outlined in the Recreation and Open Space Element of this Plan. • The existing level- of-serviceLOS measured by the number of acres of parkand parks available per 1,000 residents of the City based on an inventory of parklands -parks in the City and the population of the City. • The existing level of 3crviccLOS for recreation facilities measured by the adopted standard based on an inventory of the facilities in the City and the population of the City. !The adopted level-of scrviccLOS standards for parkland park acreage and guidelines for individual recreation facilities as outlined in the Recreation and Open Space Element of this Plan. !__The projected capacities or deficiencies. 7. Public Schools: • The existing level oc 3crviccLOS standard for public schools measured by the Volusia County School Board. • The projected student enrollment capital improvements, and estimated revenues measured by the Volusia County School Board. B. CONCURRENCY ASSESSMENT The Planning - Development Services Department is responsible for determining concurrency for all applications for development, redevelopment, and subdivision plats. When reviewing applications for such developments, the Department performs a Concurrency Assessment to ensure that public facilities are or will be available concurrent with the impacts of the proposed development. The assessment includes a basis for the establishment of existing conditions and the capacity of existing public facilities to service new development. The Department shall identify: • The ability of existing facilities to accommodate the proposed development at the adopted level ef-ser ieeLOS standards; CM -3 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB - ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions --- Text with strikethrough = deletions) • Any existing facility deficiencies that will need to be corrected prior to the completion of the proposed development; • The facility(s) improvements or additions that will be needed to accommodate the impacts of the proposed development at the adopted level(s) -of- service created by the proposed development; -and • The date such facility(s) improvements or additions will need to be completed to be concurrent with the impacts on such facility(s) created by the proposed development; and • A recommendation or approval or denial with any applicable conditions or the timing and location of needed improvements. Prior to the issuance of a development order for a proposed new development, the City Council and /or the Planning Department determines: • The impacts created by the proposed development; • Whether the public facilities covered under the Concurrency Management System will be available concurrent with the impacts of new development at the adopted levelLOS; • Those facility(s) improvements or additions that are required to ensure the findings of concurrency; and • The entity responsible for the design and installation of all required facility(s) improvements or additions. 1. Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, DrainageStormwater, and Potable Water Facilities 11) A development order is issued subject to the condition that at the time of the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, or its functional equivalent, the necessary facilities and services are in place and available to service the new development; or 2b) At the time the development order is issued, the necessary facilities are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement pursuant to Section 163.3220, F.S.; or 3c) An agreement, or development order, issued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S., to be in place and available to serve the new development at the time of the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. (Section 163.3180[2a], F.S.) d) Additionally fFor potable water, prior to approval of a building permit or its functional equivalent, the City shall determine that there will be adequate CM -4 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB - ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions -- Text with strikethrough = deletions) water supplies and facilities available no later than the date at which the City anticipates issuing a cCertificate of ©Occupancy to serve the new development. 2. Parks and Recreation Facilities 1 a) At the time the development order is issued, the necessary facilities are in place, or actual construction has commenced; or 2b) A development order is issued subject to the condition that at the time of the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the acreage for the necessary facilities to serve the new development is dedicated, or acquired by the City, or funds in the amount of the developer's fair share are committed; andor 3c) A development order is issued subject to the conditions that the necessary facilities needed to serve the new development are scheduled to be in place, or under actual construction, not more than one (1) year after the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, as provided in the City's Capital Improvement Element; or 4d) At the time the development order is issued, the necessary facilities are the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the necessary facilities and services to serve the new development to be in place or under actual construction no more than one (1) year after issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; or Se) At the time the development order is issued, the necessary facilities are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement pursuant to Section 163.3220, F.S. or under actual construction not more than one (1) year after issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 3. Transportation Facilities 1-a) At the time a development order is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under construction; or 2b) A development order is issued subject to the conditions that the necessary facilities and services needed to serve the new development are scheduled to be in place or under actual construction not more than three (3) years after the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or its functional equivalent, as provided in the adopted City's (Five (5)1Year !Schedule of tCapital !Improvements. CM -5 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB - ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions -- Text with strikethrough = deletions) The sSchedule of cCapital :Improvements may include transportation projects included in the first three (3) years of the most current adopted Florida Department of Transportation Five Year Work Program. The Capital Improvement Element must include the following policies: i. The estimated date of actual project construction commencement and the estimated completion date; ii. A provision that a plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer, or delay construction of any local road facility which is needed to maintain the adopted lcvcl of- servieeLOS standard and which is listed in the first three (3) years of the /Five (5),Year sSchedule of ilmprovements in the Capital Improvements Element. 3c) At the time a development order is issued, the necessary facilities are the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the necessary facilities to serve the new development to be in place or under actual construction no more than three (3) years after the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; or 4d) At the time a development order is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220, F.S.; or an agreement or development order is issued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S.; and will be in place or under actual construction not more than three (3) years after issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The adopted lcvel of sc_ iccLOS standards (see Table CM -I) are the minimum acceptable standards with which all proposed new development shall comply. The Concurrency Management portion of this eElement does not preclude the Planning and Zoning Board or the City Council from imposing other conditions of approval, including improvements and additions to the facilities covered under this system beyond the minimum necessary to achieve concurrency. 4. School Facilities For school facilities, the following standards will satisfy the requirement: a) For district -wide concurrences service areas: CM -6 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB- ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions --- Text with strikethrough = deletions) 1. At the time the residential development order or permit is issued the necessary facilities and services are in place or under construction _or 2. residential development order or permit is issued subject to the conditions that the necessary facilities and services needed to serve the new development are scheduled to be in place or under construction not more than 3 years after permit issuance as provided in the adopted public school facilities program. b) For less than concurrency service areas: public school concurrency is applied on less than a district -wide basis in the form of concurrency service areas, a residential development order or permit shall be issued only if the needed capacity for the particular service area is available in one or more contiguous service areas and school capacity is available district- wide as defined in Section 163.3180(13)(e), F.S. C. GENERAL RULES FOR CONCURRENCY ASSESSMENT 1. Existing Deficiencies No development may be approved which will impact a facility which is currently deficient unless the facility is required to be improved in the current fiscal year pursuant to a previous development order or permit. Any needed improvements shall be completed prior to the projected impacts of the proposed development. 2. Approved Impacts The impacts of new development shall be assessed against the existing conditions and the projected impacts from approved but un -built development. These two items together shall be considered the existing conditions for all public facilities for the impact assessment of all proposed development. 3. Phasing Development that is proposed to be phased may also phase the improvement of facilities provided the concurrency requirements for each facility are met. 4. Time Specific Approval All development approvals shall have a time period specified in the development order or permit in which development must commence. The time period may involve two or more phases but the timing of each phase shall be specified in the development order or permit. CM -7 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB - ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) Any required improvements shall also require a time period for construction and completion. Should development or facilities improvements fail to begin or be completed in accordance with the development order or permit, all outstanding approvals of the development shall expire. Amendments to time schedules shall be permitted but must be approved by the body granting the original approval. 5. Additional Information The Planning Department may require additional information from applicant or other City Departments in order for an accurate assessment to be conducted. Such additional information requests shall be reasonable and be provided in writing to the applicant or appropriate Department. Should the Planning Department require a special study (such as traffic counts on a road that is not regularly monitored), the applicant shall provide such information. Review and approval of proposed development may be postponed for a reasonable time period in order that more information may be gathered on a facility. Proposed development may be denied approval, for failure of the applicant to provide adequate information on the projected impacts created by the development. 6. Transportation The City's Land Development Code provides development thresholds at which traffic studies will be required. Required studies shall use the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Manual to calculate the number of trips generated by the proposed development. The study shall then show the distribution of the projected trips, determine existing condition and project the lcvcl of scrviceLQS of impacted roads. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all facility improvements necessary to accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving a Certificate of Occupancy shall be in place. Completed improvements may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit if deemed necessary for public safety purposes. 7. Sanitary Sewer The City's Land Development Code provides sanitary sewer use standards for residential and non - residential development based on equivalent residential units. The City may also require commercial and industrial developments to provide a description and estimate of water use needs for any commercial or industrial processes which create wastewater that will be discharged into the City's system. CM -8 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB - ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all facility improvements necessary to accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving a Certificate of Occupancy shall be in place, as required by the Development Order. 8. Potable Water The City's Land Development Code provides potable water use standards for residential and non - residential development based on equivalent residential units. The City may also require commercial and industrial developments to provide a description and estimate of water use needs for any commercial or industrial processes involving potable water. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all facility improvements necessary to accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving a Certificate of Occupancy shall be in place, as required by the Development Order. Prior to approval of a building permit or its functional equivalent, the City shall determine that there will be adequate water supplies and facilities available no later than the date at which the City anticipates issuing a certificate of occupancy to serve the new development. All development is subject to the City's Concurrency Management sSystem. 9. Solid Waste The City's Land Development Code provides solid waste standards for control and operation for residential, commercial, and industrial developments. Developments which are potential hazardous waste generators will be responsible for coordinating with Volusia County for disposal of such waste. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all facility improvements necessary to accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving a Certificate of Occupancy shall be in place. 10. Stormwater Drainage All developments shall prepare a drainage plan based on the Stormwater regulations which incorporate the level- of- servieeLOS design storm. Such plans shall be approved by the City's Engineer prior to the approval of the development. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, all facility improvements necessary to accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving the building permit CM -9 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB - ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) shall be approved and all improvements shall be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 11. Recreation The City's Land Development Code requires recreation impact fees for residential construction and /or land conveyance for new subdivisions. Commercial and industrial developments shall not be assessed as having an impact on recreational facilities. However, the City reserves the right to require the provision of recreational facilities as part of Planned Unit Developments. CM -10 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB - ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) D. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES Goal- 3:GOAL 1: City shall undertake necessary action to economically and efficiently provide needed public facilities and services to all residents within its jurisdiction in a manner which protects investments in existing facilities, maximizes the use of existing facilities, and promotes orderly compact urban growth. Objective 3.1 :Obj_ective l 1; Capital Improvements Provision. Capital Improvements --w\ ill be provided to correct existing deficiencies, to accommodate anticipated future growth, and to replace outdated and obsolete facilities, as indicated in the Schedule of Improvements of this Element.j9J- 5.016 (3)(4)1 F.A.C.] Poliey- 3d1:Policy 1.1.1: Criteria for Capital lmprovementProjects. The City shall include all projects identified in the other Elements of this Comprehensive Plan determined to be of relatively large scale in cost ($25,000 or greater) as Capital Improvement Projects and are included within the Schedule of Improvements portion of this Element. Policy -31.2:Policy1.12 Debt service and Operating Expenditures. The City shall, for accounting purposes, also include into this Element Debt Service and Operating expenditures. P-olicy 1.13:Policy 1.1.3: Scheduling. Funding Capital Improvements. The City shall, as a matter of priority, schedule, and fund all capital improvement projects in the City's annual Capital Improvement Program which are designed to correct existing deficiencies as listed in the various other Elements of this Plan. Policy — 3.1.4:Policy 1.1.4: and Replacement of Capital Facilities. The City will continue its current program of providing for renewal and replacement of capital facilities as outlined in the various Elements of this Plan. Policy- 3. 1.:Policy1.1.5: Capital Improvements Coordinating Committee. A Capital Improvements Coordinating Committee shall be created composed of the Technical Review Committee members as designated by the City Manager to evaluate and rank, on an annual basis, in order of priority, the projects proposed to be included in the Schedule of Improvements. CM -11 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB - ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) Policy -M6:Polic/ 1.16: Evaluation and ranking _ of Capital _ Improvement Projects. Proposed City Capital Improvement Projects shall be evaluated and ranked in order of priority according to the following criteria: • Whether the project is needed to protect the public health and safety, to fulfill the City's legal commitment to provide facilities and services, or to preserve or achieve full use of those facilities already in place; • Whether the project increases efficiency of use of existing facilities, prevents or reduces future improvement costs, provides services to develop areas lacking full service, or promotes in -fill development; • Whether the project represents a logical extension of facilities and services within the designated Utility Service Area Boundary, and is coordinated with the plans of County and /or State agencies that provide facilities within the City; • Whether the project implements the policies of this Comprehensive Plan as they pertain to the concurrency requirements; and • Whether the project is financially feasible. Objective 3- .2:Objective 1.2: Cost of Future Development. Ensure _._Efuture development will bear a proportionate cost of facility improvements necessitated by the development in order to maintain the adopted level- ef- serviee- LOS standards. 19J 5.016 (3)(b)4., FA.C.] Policy- 3.2:Poli 1.2.1: Impact Fees. The City will continue to collect impact fees from development projects to pay for the provision of water, sewer, and recreation facilities required by those projects. Policy 3.2.2:Policy1.2 2 Considering other Impact Fees. The City shall consider the use of other impact fees, such as for public safety services. Policy- 3.2.3:Policy 1.2.3: New Development and Donating Fair Share of Rights- of-ways. All new development shall be required to donate or reserve their fair share of right -of -way adjacent to major roadways prior to the issuance of a final development order. CM -12 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB - ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) Objective 3.3:0b4ectiv_e _1..3: Managing Financial The --City- wWill manage its financial resources to ensure the provision of needed capital improvements for previously issued development orders and for future development and redevelopment. This objective shall be achieved through the implementation of the following policies: [9j- 5.016 (3)(b)5 } F.A.C,. Policy -3.3 : Policy 1.3.1: Maximum Ratio of Outstanding In providing capital improvements, the City shall limit the maximum ratio of outstanding indebtedness to no greater than .75% of the property tax base. Policy 3:3.2:Polic 1.3.2: Annually Adopting the Capital Improvement Program. The City shall continue to adopt a Capital Improvement Program and an operating budget on a yearly basis as part of this budgeting process. Policy-3.3,3:Poliq 1.3.3: Financing the Provision of Capital Improvements. The City shall continue to apply for and secure grants or private funds whenever available to finance the provision of capital improvements and other City improvement projects. Policy- 3.14:Policy 1.3.4 Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy. - Dior - to the issuance-of £- ertifieates -o- Occupancy, the -The City will provide for all public facilities needed to service development for which Development Orders were previously issued prior to the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy. Policy 3.3.5:Policy 1.3.5: Allocating the Costs of New Public Facilities. The City shall allocate the costs of new public facilities on the basis of the benefits received by the existing and future residents. Goal 4:GOAL 2: Maintain a Concurrency Management System to ensure public facilities and services to support development are available concurrent with the impact of development. Objective 4.1:Objective 2.1_ Concurrency _ Management System. The -C --wWill continue to utilize a Concurrency Management System so that decisions regarding the issuance of development orders and permits will be based upon coordination of the development requirements included in this pPlan, the 1Land dDevelopment rRegulations, and the availability of necessary facilities to support such development. Policy- 41.1:Policy. 2.11: ._ Lcvcl of ScrviccLOS Standards and Reviewing the Impacts of Developments. The City shall use the level-of-set iceLQS (l-QS) standards (found in Table CM -I) in reviewing the impacts of new CM -13 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL AL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT ' (Text with underline = additions -- Text with strikethrough ctrikethroug h = deletions) development and /or redevelopment upon public facilities and services. [91 (2)(a), (2)(b) and c) F.A.C.] Level Standards - Table CM -I: Level -of- Service Standards Facility Standard Sanitary Sewer 204 gallons /ERU /day Solid Waste 2.53.02.51bs /capita /day Potable Water Water quality: Meet State and 204 gallons /ERU /day Federal Drinking Water Standards DrainageStormwater 25 year /24 hr storm Traffic Circulation Limited Access Roads C, or C, or as otherwise prescribed by_FDOT as— otherwisc prescribed by FDOT Arterial D D _ Collectors —D D Guideline for Recreational LOS /Person Facilities Parkland 5 acres /1,000 persons _ Baseball /Softball 1 Field /4,000 persons Basketball Court 1 court /5,000 persons Tennis Court 1 court /3,500 persons Handball /Racquetball Court 1 court /4,000 persons Community Center 1 facility /30,000 persons Multi - Purpose /Soccer 1 field /4,000 persons Shuffle Board Court 1 court /1,500 persons Bocci Ball Court 1 court/ 10,000 persons Volley Ball Court 1 court /5,000 persons Boat Ramps 1 ramp /4,700 persons Bike /Pedestrian Trail 1 mile /4,000 persons Fitness Trails 1 mile/ 14,000 persons Activities Center 1/15,000 persons Gymnasium N/A Public Schools Elementary. Schools 115% of _permanent FISH capacity for the concurrency service area. CM -14 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB - ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions -- Text with strikethrough = deletions) Facility Standard K- 8 Schools 115% permanent FISH capacity for the concurrency service area. Middle Schools 115 % _ of permanent FISH capacity for the concurrency service area High Schools 120 % of _ permanent FISH capacity for the concurrency sery ice area Special Purpose Schools 10010 of permanent FISH capacity. ERU- Equivalent Residential Units FISH- Florida Inventory of School House Polic7 4- .4.2:Poli 2.1.2: Adequate _ Water _ _5upplies and Facilities and Concurrency. Prior to approval of a building permit or its functional equivalent, the City shall determine that there will be adequate water supplies and facilities available no later than the date at which the City anticipates issuing a certificate of occupancy to serve the new development. All development is subject to the City's Concurrency Management system. [9J- 5.0055.(3)(c 6, F.A.C.J Policy -4 .3:Policy 2.1.3: Tracking Water Demands and Outstanduig Commitments. The City shall track current water demand and outstanding commitments in order to determine the availability of an adequate water supply for proposed developments. Policy- 41:4:Policy 2.1.4: _ Concurrency Requirements. Provisions in the Comprehensive Plan that ensure public facilities and service standards will be met to satisfy the Concurrency requirements are listed below: • The necessary facilities and services are in place at the time a development permit is issued; or • A development permit is issued subject to the condition that the necessary facilities and services will be in place when the impacts of the development occur; or • The necessary facilities are under construction at the time a permit is issued; or • The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement that includes the provision CM -15 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB - ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions Text with st- rikethrough = deletions) of the Florida Administrative Code. The agreement must guarantee that the necessary facilities and services will be in place when the impacts of the development occur; or • At the time the development permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed contract which provides for the commencement of the actual construction of the required facilities or the provision of services within one (1) year of the issuance of the applicable development permit. • The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement which required the commencement of the actual construction of the facilities or the provision of services within one (1) year of the issuance of the applicable development permit. [9J- 5.00551,3)(c)6, F.A.C4 Policy 4.1.5 :PoL 2.1.5: Evaluation Guidelines for New Development Redevelopment Proposed Plan amendments and requests for new development or redevelopment shall be evaluated according to the following guidelines as to whether the proposed action would: • Bbe consistent with the Utilities Element and the Coastal Management Element and not contribute to a condition of public hazard. • Bbe consistent with the Transportation Element; Utilities Element and Recreation and Open Space Element and not intensify any existing public facility capacity deficits not envisioned within this pPlan. • Ggenerate public facility demands that may be accomplished by planned capacity increases. • Cconform with to future land uses as shown on the Future - Land UseMap -FLUM of the Future d Use Element FLUE. • Aaccommodate public facility demands based upon level -o€ servieeLOS standards by provision of facilities by the developer or by the City consistent with this eEeement. CM -16 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB - ELEMENT (Text with underline = additions — Text with strikethrough = deletions) • Bbe consistent with the County, State, and Regional agencies and water management district's facilities plans. CM -17