04-24-1989 - Special
"
'.
~
....,
CITY COUNCIL OF EDGEWATER
SPECIAL MEETING
APRIL 24, 1989
MINUTES
Mayor Mitchum called the meeting to order at 7: 00 p. m. in the
Library. He stated the items on the agenda were: 1) Adoption of
resolution to accept financing proposal for computer systems,
software, and associated peripherals; 2) Briefing by consulting
engineers on investment banking services; and 3) Presentations by
the four short listed investment bankers: A. G. Edwards & Sons,
Inc. ; PaineWebber Incorporated; Southeastern Municipal Bonds,
Inc.; and William R. Hough & Co.
ROLL CALL
Mayor David Mitchum
Councilman Dan Hatfield
Councilwoman Gigi Bennington
Councilman Russell Gold
Councilman Thomas Fish
City Attorney Jose' Alvarez
City Manager William Powers
Acting City Clerk Susan Wadsworth
Chief Lawrence Schumaker
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Also present was Mr. Gerald Hartman, Vice President, Dyer, Riddle,
Mills & Precourt, Inc.
Mayor Mitchum suggested Chief Schumaker be excused and no Council
member expressed an objection. Chief Schumaker left the meeting
at this time.
Adootion of resolution to acceot financina orooosals for computer
systems. software. and associated ~eri~herals - Mr. Powers stated
that at the last meeting Council directed the City Attorney to
review the agreement and put the resolution into our format and it
is ready for adoption. City Attorney Alvarez read this reso-
lution. Res. 89-R-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF EDGEWATER, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A THREE-YEAR
TERM NOTE OF THE CITY IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $66,000 FOR THE
PURPOSE OF ACQUIRING CERTAIN COMPUTER EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE; PRO-
VIDING FOR THE REPAYMENT OF SUCH NOTE; AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF SUCH
NOTE TO SOUTHEAST BANK, N.A.; MAKING CERTAIN COVENANTS AND AGREE-
MENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; REPEALING ALL RESOLUTIONS IN CON-
FLICT HEREWITH AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. He pointed out
a computer equipment list is attached as Exhibit A and the note is
attached as Exhibit B, and the documents were prepared by the
financing institution. Councilman Fish moved they accept 89-R-25.
Councilman Gold seconded the motion. Motion CARRIED 5-0.
Briefina by consultina enaineers on investment bankina services -
Mr. Hartman stated they had an excellent response to their Requests
for Proposals, the Finance Committee met and opened the proposals
and they prepared a ranking for Council's deliberations. He
reviewed the criteria they looked for such as, listed in Bond
Buyers, prior experience, the deals they managed or co-managed
since 1986, face amount of the bond issue, and their role. He
pointed out that innovation in governmental financing was very
important, especially since January, 1986, in regard to the Tax
Reform Bill. He noted that they all replied that they had no
litigation and they provided a spread on a not to exceed basis.
He stated that he's been involved in 37 transactions in the State
and this was an excellent response. He stated the four short
listed were not ranked. He distributed a sheet of questions for
1
~
"WfII
Briefina bv consulting enaineers on investment banking services
(Continued)
use by Council. He stated that the transactions require the firm's
dedication to the City of Edgewater and there's an intangible of
a general chemistry between the individuals who present their
experience and the Council. He pointed out that it's not just
pledging water and sewer rates on a bond issue but will include
pledging stormwater utility revenues, involve assessments, rates
and charges and capital charges and impact fees.
Mr. Hartman stated there are two nationwide firms that have strong
capabilities - paineWebber and A. G. Edwards, a very large and
reputable firm, and two Florida oriented firms: Southeastern, the
smallest of the four, and William R. Hough, which is a middle sized
firm. He stated that in December he'd worked on a transaction with
Southeastern Municipal and A. G. Edwards, and has worked with over
50 million with principals of paineWebber and 26.3 million with
William R. Hough & Co. He suggested they may want to rank them or
negotiate with the top I, 2, or 3, as it doesn't fall strictly
under the CCNA, which is only for engineers. Councilman Fish
stated they can't go too far wrong with any of the four. Mr.
Hartman said it would be unfair to provide an opinion prior to the
presentation and they'll provide it pro forma and will work closely
with the investment bankers in these types of transactions.
A gentleman in the audience asked if it was decided they'd have a
bond. Mayor Mitchum suggested he talk with the City Manager. The
gentleman asked if he'll be assessed a certain amount to support
a new bond. Mayor Mitchum replied the calculations are not
finished yet. The gentleman asked if Florida Shores will be
assessed equally to the rest of the community or a separate one for
Florida Shores. Mayor Mitchum replied that Florida Shores will
provide for their own services.
A. G. Edwards & Sons. Inc.
Fred Pauzar and Burt Saunders represented this firm. Mr. Pauzar
stated they're the largest investment banker with headquarters
outside of New York and 90% of their business is with retail
investors. He said the interest and debt service is the real
issue, and the market place is the retail investors market, it's
strongest, and the only way the City can achieve the lowest
possible interest rate is to effectively sell to that market. He
explained that in selecting a firm with a strong retail capability
and putting them directly in the portfolios of the investors, you
can achieve a lower rate. He stated their firm is 6th largest in
the country and they have branches in many states and the longest
established branch is in Florida.
Mr. Pauzar stated they sold over 2 billion dollars in paper last
year and their booklet shows a marketing plan on how they propose
to sell the financing. He said a series of small financings rather
than a major large capital financing would be of benefit to the
communi ty because the City would have to bear the debt service
before they have the facilities in place. He stated they have
knowledge of the capital improvement needs and the ability to come
up with solutions that can save money.
Mr. Pauzar suggested an issue of $5 million or less be issued this
year and it not be secured by special assessments or general
obligations of the City, but a bond anticipation note be issued to
have funds to use for the projects to allow proceeding in a timely
manner to meet immediate need for engineering and planning and the
kickoff of the ClP. He pointed out the small issue exemption in
the Tax of 1986 with any of the proceeds not used to be invested
at a higher rate and keeping the proceeds. He noted the arbitrage
rebate comes into place, they'll be offering tax free bonds and you
don't have to pay such high interest as taxable. He suggested
investing in treasury bonds to earn higher rates and the City keep
the interest, meeting debt service requirements.
2 Council Special Meeting Minutes
April 24, 1989
"
'-"
...".,
A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. (Continued)
Councilwoman Bennington asked who from the firm will handle the
issue and Mr. Pauzar replied he and Burt Saunders.
Mr. Pauzar stated that Mr. Saunders was a former County Attorney
for Collier County and a former Assistant Attorney in Dade County
and is an authority on solid waste issues and infrastructure
projects. He added that others will be assigned for marketing.
Councilman Fish asked if they'll plan to market the bonds as public
or private. Mr. Pauzar replied that with private placement they're
selling a bond to someone and requiring they hold the bonds for the
duration and it doesn't have to meet all the regulatory criteria
and the public sale market is the only way to go.
Councilman Fish asked the basic take down cost for a $5 million
issue. Mr. Pauzar replied a short term bond would be $5 per
$1,000 commission or take down, and 5 to 10 years at $6.25 per
$1,000 up to $7.50 per $1,000. He added that long term bonds with
level payments would be about $10 per $1,000 and that's the type
of rate on a State of Florida issue. Councilman Fish asked if
they'd recommend pursuing funds from the State revolving loan fund.
Mr. Pauzar replied yes, and to plan on a parallel course of action
in the event it doesn't come through.
Mayor Mitchum asked the net capital of the firm, if most of the
debt or equity is capital, and if they could buy the City's bonds.
Mr. Pauzar replied their total capital is just over $270 million
in terms of free capital and they have no long term debt and never
have had any so none represents debt capital. He stated they're
the largest firm in the industry that's debt free. Mayor Mitchum
asked if they could write a check for the $30 million and Mr.
Pauzar replied yes. Mr. Pauzar added that their line of credit at
Sun Bank is $2 million. He pointed out they bypass acting as a
middle man and attract other firms to buy the retail bonds
directly. Mayor Mitchum asked if they can distribute nationally
and Mr. Pauzar replied they're a full service client-oriented
brokerage firm and their business is doing financing for local
governments in the United States.
Councilman Hatfield asked if their organization analyzed the City's
capital needs in preparing this presentation and what financing
structure they tentatively recommend. Mr. Pauzar replied a lot of
firms can do this and they want to come up with the lowest possible
interest rate and it will be multiple financing with road projects,
stormwater needs, pipe lines, and other projects. He pointed out
the problem with doing it at one issue is how to secure it as all
the revenue sources are placed in the one issue and there could be
an emergency arise. He suggested they go with the bond antici-
pation note for the first step with the intention of doing bond
financing within the next three years. He pointed out this will
start the projects and not overcommit the City up front.
Mr. Saunders stated they're anxious to work with the City and rec-
ognize the need for flexibility and don't want to put them in a
position that will give them trouble down the road with financing
done today. He guaranteed flexibility.
paineWebber Incorporated
Rick Fitzgerald, Vice President of the Orlando office, introduced
representatives from their firm, Jay Olson, Vice President and Curt
Bracey, First Vice-President, noting that others will be involved
from the New York office. He stated the bonds will be sold in
states other than Florida. He said that last year Paine-Webber was
rated 6th in negotiated underwriting rankings, and their capital
posi tion has increased every year over the last 5 years. He
pointed out that for the last 3 years paineWebber was ranked #1
nationally with water and sewer and they understand the situations
facing Edgewater. He reviewed their water and sewer clients. He
3 Council Special Meeting Minutes
April 24, 1989
~
...."
paineWebber Incorcorated (Continued)
said they were 3rd in the State last year with negotiated under-
writings with $740 million in bonds issued. He pointed out they
have 25 branch offices and 331 account representatives to sell the
bonds with 10 people assigned to the institutional market. He
stated they can't rely on selling all the bonds in Florida and some
have to be placed with institutions outside the State. He
introduced Jay Olson, Vice President.
Mr. Olson stated their goal is to achieve the lowest overall bond
cost and issue as small an amount of bonds as possible. He briefly
reviewed the zero coupon bond concept. He said they have a strong
retail market in Florida and they foresee most going there. He
suggested the debt service be structured on annual debt service
~ructure and use 30 year amortization of the bonds because
they're in the flat yield curve and will require less than debt
rate covenant. He said they'll procure municipal bond insurance
that will enhance marketability. He noted that pledged revenues
are equal to 125 to 150 times debt service and they're looking at
net user charges and adding some non-ad valorem taxes, i . e . ,
utility taxes or assessment fees. He stated the insurers will look
for a feasibility report and he'd suggest introductory meetings
before presenting them with the full package.
Mr. Bracey stated they try to insure the lowest interest cost and
save the most money and that's the result of the broadest dis-
tribution and to target who'll buy the bonds, whether it's an
institution or paying a little more in marketing costs with retail
buyers and individuals and trust departments. He reviewed their
personnel available through the U. S. and the State of Florida.
He pointed out that accelerated redemption has been very success-
ful and certain bonds are redeemed prior to maturity with interest
savings and market savings. He reviewed the zero coupon bonds,
types of purchasers, and the time table for approaching the
marketing plan. He pointed out they sell allover the country and
get pre-sale indications of interest from their brokers and direct
mail campaigns go out and they purchase media advertising. He
stated they anticipate a flat interest rate for the rest of the
year with a trend toward lower interest rates by the last quarter
of the year. He pointed out there's volatility with 30 year issue
but there's a flatness of the yield curve.
Councilman Hatfield asked if the City should obtain funds from the
State revolving loan fund. Mr. Fitzgerald replied they had less
than a 30 year payback on that and to secure permanent financing
he wouldn't suggest going to a shorter term. Mr. Hartman clari-
fied that it's a 20 year term with a buy down of 3%.
Councilwoman Bennington asked the special benefits and Mr. Fitz-
gerald replied doing future financing will require documents that
are correct the first time around and they'll give the most
aggressive pricing of any firms.
Councilman Gold asked the net capital, if most of it is debt or
equity capital, and if the firm would be able to buy the City's
bonds. Mr. Olson replied net capital is just under $1-1/2 billion.
Mayor Mitchum asked if they'll buy the bonds at closing. Mr.
Fitzgerald replied yes.
Councilman Gold asked the take down amount paid to brokers and
sellers. The reply was a total of $10.34, with $7.44 for under-
writer's counsel, which is basically the selling commission.
Councilman Fish asked what they'd done in analyzing the City's
needs. Mr. Fitzgerald replied they only had one document that was
a brief summary of the water and sewer with drainage needs.
4 Council Special Meeting Minutes
April 24, 1989
.......
."",.,
paineWebber Incorporated (Continued)
Councilman Fish asked if they would market them as public or
private. Mr. Bracey replied they'll save money with public and
getting broadest distribution as he'd rather pay $7.44 and amor-
tize that in low interest costs over the 30 year period. Mr.
Fitzgerald pointed out that some firms will offer low spread and
then they'll bump up the coupons.
.
Mayor Mitchum called a short recess at 8:25 p.m.
recessed meeting back to order at 8:29 p.m.
He called the
Southeastern Kunici~al Bonds. Inc.
Toby Wagner, Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Orlando,
distributed copies of their booklet. Bill Weathers, Vice Presi-
dent, was also present. Mr. Wagner stated that Mr. Akers was not
able to be present because of another meeting in Orlando. He
reviewed the team approach used and presented a brief summary of
their experience. He stated they've been in business since 1956
and are one of the oldest domicile firms. He said they have
offices in Mobile and Atlanta serving the southeast region. He
briefly reviewed their water and sewer experience. He stated they
have had some clients for 30 years. He pointed out they had a drop
in 1987-88 due to the Tax Reform Act and changes in the municipal
bond business. He stated that in the last several years they've
had 161 issues in the State totalling about $1-1/2 billion. He
pointed out they worked with Port Orange in developing the storm-
water runoff pledge which could be useful here in financial
planning. He reviewed the booklet. He stated that he'd assisted
in drafting the special legislation for the State, Chapter 170.
He encouraged contact of references.
Bill Weathers stated he'd worked with bond issues in every state
in a variety and types of financing and they have an experienced
team. He said he'd worked with Edgewater through Farmers Home and
it was refunded through the loan with Gulf Breeze. He said there
is a water and wastewater project and that would be an issue where
you pledge the user fees and special assessments. He reviewed some
of his experience with assessment issues and general obligation
bond issues.
Councilman Hatfield asked if they recommend obtaining funds from
the State revolving loan fund. Mr. Wagner replied they should look
at it because the program's been in use in one form or another over
the years and it depends on whether the State is ready to go to
market when they are and if they can meet the City's needs at that
time. He added they need to analyze if it's a cost benefit, as it
takes longer to get in and out of the market. Councilwoman
Bennington asked if the firm has the ability to distribute the
bonds nationally and the strength of the brokerage system. Mr.
Wagner replied yes, and most Florida issues can adequately be
distributed in Florida as Florida out-trades the national market.
He noted there's a demand in Florida for this type of project and
they have the capability to tap the national markets. Councilwoman
Bennington asked what buyers will have the biggest demand. Mr.
Wagner replied Florida retails and institutional bond funds.
Councilman Fish asked the basic take down on a $5 million issue.
Mr. Wagner replied for 30 years in today's market will be $7.50 to
$7.75, depending on where the bonds are marketed and they could do
it at about $4 if it were an institution. Councilman Fish asked
type of paper they recommend, general obligation or zero coupon,
or what. Mr. Wagner replied general obligation are tax supported
bonds that are supported by ad valorem which will require refer-
endum versus water and sewer or stormwater which is a different
issue than zero coupon where you structure the issue, then it's a
marketing gimmick to drive interest rates down. He pointed out
they have close to an inverted yield curve on the bond market and
the treasury market is inverted, with short term yielding higher
rates than long term. He suggested they structure the issue and
figure out what they'll use as collateral and then if they need to
5 Council Special Meeting Minutes
April 24,1989
..,.
....".,
Southeastern Municipal Bonds. Inc. (Continued)
validate, determine what marketing technique to use and for what
period of time.
Mayor Mitchum asked the net capital of the firm and if most of it
is debt or capital. Mr. Wagner replied $6-1/2 million in capital
available which will support $65 to $70 million in buying power.
He said they don't exceed in terms of general inventory $10 million
in bonds so there's in excess of $50 million available for buying
power toward the proprietary power when they underwrite a bond
issue. Mayor Mitchum asked if it's in cash. Mr. Wagner replied
it's net capital which is more, and ready capital would be infused
to buying power and they can purchase 1500 times the buying power.
He stated that no firm in Florida would solely take on an issue of
$50 million or greater by themselves but may be the sole under-
writer and have syndicated or group members. Mayor Mitchum asked
if they can buy $30 million. Mr. Wagner replied yes. Mayor
Mitchum asked if they would get a check when closed. Mr. Wagner
replied yes.
Mr. Hartman asked if they'd recommend the negotiated sale or
competitive sale. Mr. Wagner replied negotiated sale because the
type of transaction they're talking about lends itself to
negotiated but a general obligation will lend itself more to public
or competitive sale. Mr. Hartman asked if take down varies if it's
negotiated. Mr. Wagner replied no, and in negotiated sale they'd
have the option to have less take down because you can pre-sell the
bonds and with competitive sale you submit a sealed bid.
William R. Houah & Co.
Mitchell Owens, Senior Vice President, and Craig Hunter, First Vice
President, represented William R. Hough. Mr. Hunter stated
they've been in business since 1962, and from 1983 to 1987 in
Florida they were the leading managing underwriter. He stated the
bonds will sell better in Florida than elsewhere because the State
doesn' t have an income tax. He stated that Florida water and sewer
experience has a total of about $2-1/2 billion. He stated that he
was a City and County Manager and has practical experience in fin-
ancing from both the private ad public sides. He said in a market
like they have now with the 1986 Tax Law they're limited to the
amount of times they can refinance in terms of redemption pro-
visions on length of times to call in bonds. He added that special
assessments have a special option redemption provision. He stated
that right before they're ready to go to market, they'll see the
cost for an insured rate compared to non-insured.
Mr. Owens reviewed their 20 years experience. He noted that with
the $5 million cap they could collect the arbitrage. He briefly
reviewed the bank qualifying criteria for bank buy backs, noting
the benefit is the bonds can be sold as bank qualified and will be
in a secondary market for about 20 years. He stated they daily
maintain portfolios of $50 to $100 millions of bonds in the second-
ary market. He suggested they may want to split the financing and
do one this year and next year do the remaining portion. He noted
they can get discounts for paying off early. He pointed out they
set aside bonds for the community to buy to become a part of the
growth of their community. He said they have access to a large
market and sell directly to every retail outlet such as Merrill
Lynch and Dean Witter. He stated they'd like to be the senior
manager and if not selected, they'd like to serve as co-manager.
Councilman Fish asked the basic take down for a $5 or $10 million
issue. Mr. Owens replied about $8.75 take down spread with a total
of $5.00. Mr. Hunter pointed out that take down is a commission
and if it's lower, than you usually have a higher interest rate.
Councilman Fish asked if the net capital is in the form of debt or
equity and if they could outright purchase the $30 million. Mr.
Owens replied yes, they have $15 to $17 million for the firm in
equity and their credit lines are with financial institutions in
New York and their entire capital is dedicated to Florida municipal
6 Council Special Meeting Minutes
April 24, 1989
'w'
"""'"
William R. Houah & Co. (Continued)
bonds. He added they could give a check for $30 million solely or
with a co-manager.
Councilman Fish asked if they'd recommend seeking funds from the
State revolving loan funds. Mr. Hunter replied there are questions
about how that fund will work, but depending on the timing, it
would pay to investigate it. Mr. Owens stated they work for the
City of Ocala and have investigated it for two years and timing is
important plus terms of the loans and where they'll be in line to
get it.
Councilwoman Bennington asked who in the firm would handle the
project. Mr. Owens replied that Mr. Hunter will be the main con-
tact person and he'll be beside him and they have a full computer
department and a specialist in water and sewer financing.
Councilman Hatfield asked if the firm is capable of distributing
nationally and if they'll do that. Mr. Owens replied yes, they're
considered a regional firm, but most of these bonds will be sold
in Florida but they'll try to sellon a national basis if they run
into problems. He pointed out that Florida trades lower than other
states. Councilman Hatfield asked if 20 or 30 years is better.
Mr. Owens replied it depends on rate increases but with the curve
there's little difference with 20 to 30 years and they can maximize
the benefit by going with either.
Mayor Mitchum asked if the type of sale has to be creative and Mr.
Owens replied yes, they're going to need a story bond to sell these
and tell about the growth. He added that if they set up a competi-
tive sale, they may not hit the market and get the best rate but
with a negotiated sale you can wait for the market to get better.
He suggested they negotiate the sale.
Mr. Hunter stated they'd like to be the senior manager on an issue
of this type and have worked with all as a joint or co-manager.
Mayor Mitchum asked Mr. Hartman his opinion. Mr. Hartman reviewed
various points of each firm. He noted that William R. Hough has
a lot of power in Florida and has done 400 issues in water and
sewer. He added that it's important who is doing the deal and they
committed a good staff but he doesn't think that's the 'A' team.
He stated that A. G. Edwards has dedicated the 'A' team, and paine-
Webber is very strong and has a full list of analysts. He said he
just did a deal with Southeastern and their interest rate was
lowest but they don't have the same track record for total pro-
jects. He stated that because of the activity they have to see
who they'd commit and he'd recommend two firms: A. G. Edwards, and
paineWebber for their overall marketing capabilities. He pointed
out that he knows Norman Pellegrini personally and he's not here
and the two top people from A. G. Edwards were here. He added that
the committal of A. G. Edwards would make them #l and Paine-Webber
would be #2 and the other two would be a close #3. Mr. Hartman
s ta ted that the Finance Commi t tee, Ci ty Manager, and Engineers
worked hard for four good people and based on what he saw and the
commitment, they need A. G. Edwards. He suggested they select one
or two and negotiate to see the best terms and types of commitments
they'll make.
Mayor Mitchum requested the City Attorney's input. City Attorney
Alvarez replied the key is negotiations and no one can give you
today what the commissions will be. He added they'll negotiate
and compare what they can get from the other firms. He suggested
they select at least two firms for negotiations.
Councilwoman Bennington moved they authorize negotiations with A.G.
Edwards and paineWebber as the top two choices for the CIP
Committee and bring back their recommendation. Councilman Gold
seconded the motion. Motion CARRIED 5-0.
7 Council Special Meeting Minutes
April 24, 1989
" \-
'w
......,
Mayor Mitchum requested a motion to adjourn. Councilman Fish so
moved. Councilman Hatfield seconded the motion. Meeting was
adjourned at 9:36 p.m.
Minutes submitted by:
Lura Sue Koser
OUNCI - ZO~~ 0
j~1~.d-fc?/';. .~~
COUNCILMAN - ZONE THREE
~~. Jl~dJ
( OUNCILMAN - ZONE FOUR
1P)
~.
ATTEST:
~(}:Jf-~
A TING CIT{I CLERK
AP~~~rp'
dR
8 Council Special Meeting Minutes
April 24, 1989