The URL can be used to link to this page

2013-O-03 ORDINANCE NO. 2013-0-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDGEWATER AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ORDINANCE NO. 2012-0-02 AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION, HOLDING PUBLIC HEARINGS, TRANSMITTING THIS ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY AND ANY OTHER UNIT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT OR GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY THAT HAS REQUESTED A COPY OF THE PLAN AMENDMENT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, from time to time it becomes necessary to amend the City of Edgewater Comprehensive Plan, and WHEREAS, the laws of Florida require the City to update the Capital Improvements Schedule annually. WHEREAS, the existing Capital Improvements Element includes the 5-year schedule of projects that must be updated to reflect the City's current 5-year plan, and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board, sitting as the City's Local Planning Agency, held an advertised Public Hearing pursuant to 163.3184(11) & 163.3174(4) (a), Fla. Stat. (2011), on Wednesday, February 13, 2013 on the proposed Plan Amendment and following that Public Hearing voted and recommended that the City Council approve the aforesaid Amendment to the City's 2012 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby declares that the purpose and intent of the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is to guide future growth and development; encourage the best use of land, water and other resources to promote and protect the general welfare of the public. Struck through passages are deleted. 1 Underlined passages are added. #2013-0-03 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDGEWATER, FLORIDA: PART A. AMENDMENT. Amending the Capital Improvements Element hereby described in Exhibit "A". PART B. PUBLICATION. Notice of this proposed change of the Edgewater Comprehensive Plan shall be published in the manner prescribed by 163.3184(11), Fla. Stat. (2011). The advertisement shall substantially be in the following form: Notice of Comprehensive Plan Amendment The City of Edgewater proposes to adopt the following ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 2013-0-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDGEWATER AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ORDINANCE NO. 2012-0-02 AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION, HOLDING PUBLIC HEARINGS, TRANSMITTING THIS ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY AND ANY OTHER UNIT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT OR GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY THAT HAS REQUESTED A COPY OF THE PLAN AMENDMENT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. A public hearing on the ordinance changing the Comprehensive Plan will be held on March 4, 2013 at 6:00 p.m. at the Community Center, 102 N. Riverside Drive, Edgewater, Florida 32132. PART C. PUBLIC HEARINGS. As a condition precedent to the adoption of this ordinance amending the City's 2012 Comprehensive Plan, the City Council shall hold at least two advertised public hearings on the Struck through passages are deleted. 2 Underlined passages are added. #2013-0-03 proposed comprehensive plan or plan amendment as follows: The first public hearing shall be held at the transmittal stage pursuant to subsection 163.3184(11) (b), Fla. Stat. It shall be held on a weekday at least 7 days after the day that the first advertisement is published. The second public hearing shall be held at the adoption stage. It shall be held on a weekday at least 5 days after the day that the second advertisement is published. 163.3184, Fla. Stat. (2011). PART D. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts thereof that are in conflict with this ordinance, are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART E. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall become effective upon its final adoption and as provided by general law. PART F. SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provisions thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. Struck through passages are deleted. 3 Underlined passages are added. #2013-0-03 PART G. ADOPTION. After a motion by Councilman Ignasiak with second by Councilwoman Power, the vote on the first reading of this ordinance held on March 4, 2013 is as follows: AYE NAY Mayor Mike Thomas X Councilwoman Christine Power X Councilwoman Gigi Bennington EXCUSED Councilman Mike Ignasiak X Councilman Gene Emter X After a motion by( �n�.,iu y 1r with second byt }`jiM« Ef-Yuier , the vote on the second reading/public hearing of this ordinance held on April 1, 2013 is as follows: AYE NAY Mayor Mike Thomas EXCUSED Councilwoman Christine Power }( Councilwoman Gigi Bennington E X CU`3(Ct Councilman Mike Ignasiak X Councilman Gene Emter �( Struck through passages are deleted. 4 Underlined passages are added. #2013-0-03 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 1. day of 4pr 2013. ATTEST: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDGEWATER, FLORIDA filTALL1,1.)Q By: Bonnie Wenzel Mike I_nasiak City Clerk Vice-Mayor Robin L. Matusick Paralegal For the use and reliance only by the City of Approved by the City Council of the City of Edgewater, Florida. Approved as to form and Edgewater at a meeting held on this 1st day of legality by: Aaron R. Wolfe, Esquire April, 2013 under Agenda Item No. 8 O. . City Attorney Doran, Sims, Wolfe & Kundid Struck through passages are deleted. 5 Underlined passages are added. #2013-0-03 EXHIBIT A Struck through passages are deleted. 6 Underlined passages are added. #2013-0-03 City of G WATER1 CITY OF EDGEWATER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CHAPTER IX CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL.IMPROVEMENTS�EMEN_T TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION 1 B. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS INVENTORY 2 1. Needs Derived from Other Elements 2 2. Existing Financial Resources 8 3. Local Revenue Sources 9 4. State Sources 12 C. FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS AND LOANS 15 D. LOCAL POLICIES AND PRACTICES 17 1. Level of Service Standards 17 2. Capital Improvements Program (CIP) 18 3. Impact Fees 19 4. Utility Service Areas 19 5. User Charges and Connection Fee 20 6. Concurrency Management System 20 7. Mandatory Dedication or Fees in Lieu Of 21 8. Moratoria 21 E. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 22 1. Fiscal Assessment 22 F. GOALS, OBJECTIVES,AND POLICIES 32 Adopted on Datc: 04/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 IX-ii CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT A. PUBLIC FACILITIES, CAPACITIES AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE INVENTORY FOR CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT CM 2 1. Transportation CM 2 2. Sanitary Sewer CM 2 3. Potable Water CM 3 4. Solid Waste Disposal CM 3 5. Stormwater Drainage CM 3 6. Recreation and Open Space CM 3 7. Public Schools CM 4 B. CONCURRENCY ASSESSMENT CM 4 1. Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, and Potable Water Facilities CM 5 2. Parks and Recreation Facilities CM 5 3. Transportation Facilities CM 6 4. School Facilities CM 7 C. GENERAL RULES FOR CONCURRENCY ASSESSMENT CM 7 1. Existing Deficiencies CM 7 2. Approved Impacts CM 8 3. Phasing CM 8 4. Time Specific Approval CM 8 5. Additional Information CM 8 6. Transportation CM 8 7. Sanitary Sewer CM 9 8. Potable Water CM 9 9. Solid Waste CM 9 10. Stormwater Drainage CM 10 11. Recreation CM 10 D. GOALS, OBJECTIVES,AND POLICIES CM 11 Adoptcd on Date: 04/02/2012 Ordinancc No. 2012 0 02 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN _ _CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT LIST OF TABLES Table 1: City of Edgewater Capital Improvement Schedule Fiscal Years Ending 2012 2044 2013-2017 3 Table 2: 2012 2016 2013-2017 Volusia County School District Five-Year Work Program 7 Table 3: Adjusted Taxable Income Projections 23 Table 4: Ad Valorem Tax Yield Projections 23 Table 5: Revenue Projections Affecting Capital Improvements 24 Table 6: Expenditure Projections for Scheduled Capital Improvements 26 Table 7: Debt Service Expenditure Projections 27 Table 8: Annual Operating Expenditures 28 Table 9: Fiscal Assessment No. 1 29 Table 10: Anticipated Increase in Ad Valorem Tax Revenue Projections 30 Table 11: City of Edgewater Five Year Schedule of Improvements Fiscal Years Ending 2012 2016 2013-2017 42 Table 12: Long Term (10 year)Transportation Improvements 44 Table CM-I: Level-of-Service Standards CM 14 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Federal Grant Agencies and Program Titles 16 Adoptcd on Datc: 04/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 IX-iv CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CHAPTER IX CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT A. INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) is to evaluate the need for public facilities as identified in other Elements of this Plan. In addition, the Capital Improvements Element will present an analysis of the fiscal capability of the City to fund needed public facilities, recommend financial policies to guide the funding of those identified improvements, and to schedule the funding and construction of improvements in a manner necessary to ensure that capital improvements are provided when required. Needed capital improvements are those which are necessary to meet the adopted level of service (LOS) standards identified in other Elements of this Plan. The City's public facilities which require identification and funding are: • Transportation Element — Roadways which are under the jurisdiction of the City, and those roadways which the City wishes to aid in funding improvements. • Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element—Sanitary sewer treatment and effluent disposal facilities necessary to serve the existing and future population of the City. In addition, recommendations for capital improvements and policies to ensure adequate sanitary sewer collection facilities. • Solid Waste-Sub Element — Solid waste disposal facilities to service the City's existing and future population, coordination with Volusia County to ensure those facilities are available when needed and recommendations for adequate solid waste collection methods. • Stormwater Sub-Element— Drainage systems necessary to meet recommended LOS standards for stormwater quality and conveyance and coordination with Volusia County for improvements to systems in basins which serve the City but are outside its jurisdiction. • Potable Water Sub Element—Potable water treatment facilities necessary to service the existing and future population of the City. In addition, recommendations for capital improvements and policies to ensure adequate potable water delivery facilities. • Recreation/Open Space Element — Recreation facilities and land areas necessary to meet the recommended LOS standards. The Capital Improvements Element will also present methods to ensure "concurrency" as defined and required in Chapter 163 F.S. The Element will also present methods to monitor the "Concurrency Management System" as defined and required in Chapter 163 F.S. Adopted on Datc: 01/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 1 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - CAPITALIMPR_OVEMENTS ELEMENT B. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS INVENTORY 1. Needs Derived from Other Elements The analysis documented in the preceding comprehensive plan elements have identified facility improvements needed to meet the existing service deficiencies and those needed to meet the demands of future growth. The geographic service areas and locations were identified for major public education and public health system components. System components whose service areas include the City are identified in the list in Table 1. The public education system is operated by the Volusia County School Board, and the public health systems are operated by the Volusia County Health Department. The Volusia County School Board presently bases its needs assessments on the findings of the Educational Plant Survey, prepared every five years by the State Department of Education in accordance with Florida Statutes. The last survey was completed in March 2012. April 2008. The results of this survey indicate no need for new schools in the near future due to the decline in student enrollment. The results of this survey indicated a nccd for a new K 8 school to be built in the City. The School Board, based on this report, has acquired a site for this facility along S.R. 442 in the southwestern section of the City, however there is no anticipated construction date until funding becomes available and enrollment incrca3cs. Indian River Elementary School has completed an eleven (11) classroom addition at its location in 2011. The remaining educational facilities were noted as being in excellent or good condition and were adequately served by roadways, sanitary sewer, solid waste, stormwater drainage,potable water and recreation facilities. The State Department of Children and Families (DCF) determines the need for new health care facilities with a formula based on occupancy rates, historic use by age group and population projections by age group. Although Edgewater currently has no full-service hospitals, there is Bert Fish Medical Center located just outside the corporate City limits that serves the Edgewater area. Based on growth forecasts a hospital will not be needed before 2030. Halifax Hospice operates a 12-bed patient care facility located at 4140 S. Ridgewood Avenue in Edgewater. Individual capital improvement needs identified in this Element are, for the most part, those improvements, which cost $25,000 or more and are generally non-recurring purchase items. The capital improvements identified in the other elements of this Comprehensive Plan are listed with a brief description in Table 1 along with their estimated costs and projected year of expenditure. The improvements are listed by type of service, related to the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan. The Capital Improvements Element addresses capital improvements needed to ensure adopted level of service standards are achieved and maintained for a 5 year period. Therefore, Table 1 lists improvements identified for the years 2012 2016 2013-2017. as well as projects from fiscal years 2010 2011 that are being carried forward. Funding Adopted on Date: 01/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 2 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHE.NSIVEPLAN _ ____ ____ ___ - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT sources for these capital improvements are listed in Table 11. Table 2 identifies the Volusia County School District Five-Year Work Program which must be referenced within in City's CIE per the Public Schools Facility Element. Table 1: City of Edgewater Capital Improvement Schedule Fiscal Years Ending 2012 2011-2013-2017 Project* Fiscal Year 2010-2011 20112012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total Garry Forward FINANCE DEPARTMENT: YMCA FIVAC Upgrade $87,905 $87,905 $87,905 $87,905 FIRE DEPARTMENT: Station 55 Replacement $807,979 $807,979 $807,979 $807,979 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES: WWTP building printing, eurvey,geotech $67,313 $67,313 WWTP Renewal and Replacement Project $6,347,283 $6,347,283 WTP Lime Silo Painting $20,000 $20,000 WTP Paint Chemical Feed Room $100,000 $100,000 2.5 MGD Wastewater $6,500,000 Treatment Plant $7,500,000 $7,500,000 $6,500,000 $14,000,000 SE Service Area Reclaimed Improvements X0004100 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 Wells 21-24 and raw water mains $27390,000 $2,300,000 $2,300,000 $4,600,000 29 $115,665 $115,665 Stormwatcr Master Plan $25,000 $25,000 Replacement of 2"Water Linca $-50,000 $50,000 X000 $150,000 Water Line Enhancement $53,120 $53,120 Project $100,000 $100,000 Adopted on Date: 01/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 3 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSME PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Project* Fiscal Year 2010-2011 2011.-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total Reclaim Water $480,000 Improvements $210,893 $210,893 Clariconc Painting $150,000 $150,000 RTU Upgrades 440400 $39:809 Sliplining Scwcra $180,009 16-1-007000 4489,098 4400,900 $137,934 $430,(400 Lift Station 1 Rehab $42,066 $175,000 $175,000 Lif-t--Station-P-neftps $ 000 $25,800 Reclaimed Water Line i ntions $50;800 $50000 Reuse Pump Station $330,009 $330,000 Sludge hand,emergency power,lab $750,000 $750,000 Contract Administration $375,725 $375,725 $431,600 $431,600 10%project contingency 144 $448,,590 $118,500 Barscrcen and headworka $2-503000 $250,000 Influent Pump Station $3003000 $300,000 Internal recycle pump station $175009 $175,000 BTU Train 111 &112 $500,000 $500;800 Chlorine,S02 and Alum Feed $330,800 $330,800 Clarifiers,RAS&WAS pumping $4337800 $435,000 Third Clarifier Building $800,000 $800009 Filters $30,000 $307048 CL2 Contract $285,000 $245,000 Polymer Station $50,000 $50,000 Replacements{ } $30,000 $30,000 Roof Replacements at W'l P $25,000 $25,000 Lime Slaker Replacements $300,000 $300,000 Educational component Eastern Shores @5","^0 $25,750 Unspecified Water $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 Unspecified Sewer $280,000 $200,000 $200,000 Unspecified Reclaimed $50009 $50,000 $50,000 Sidewalk Repaira $50:000 $50;000 Land Acquisition for new Public Works Site {Refuse} $266,562 $266,562 Adopted on Date: 04/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 4 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Project* Fiscal Year 2019-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total Land Acquisition for new Public Works Site $-50,009 {Stormwatcr) $50,909 $1,958,853 $1,958,853 MIEX Pretreatment Improvement at $3000,990 ARTWTP $3,000,000 $3,000,000 Hart Ave.Design and $490,000 $ 5,000 Grant Application $125,000 $400,500 $200,000 $600,500 Lamont Street& Riverside Drive CIP Project $2558,008 $250,000 $250,000 East Palm Way& Riverside Drive CIP $250,000 Project $250,000 $250,000 East Turgot Avenue& Riverside Drive CIP $ 5,004 Project $225,000 $225,000 G2-03 Pearl St Pipe Crossing $175,000 $175,000 IRL 09 SW Improvements(Updated Master Plan) $200,000 $200,000 Future Year Expenditure (Figures Are Cumulative) $958,853 $1 208,853 $1,458,853 $1,708,853 $5,335,412 Environmental Services $453,481 $6,734,,484 $45,500-000 $93200 3000 $33675 3000 *S51462396; Totals 9,074,129 $1,708,853 $16,508,853 $10,758,853 $5,633,853 $43684541 LEISURE SERVICES: Renovations Phase II $290,000 $290,000 Dog Park $503.009 $58,009 Mango Lake Park $500,000 $490,099 Ilawks Park $120,306 Improvements $120,306 $74,939 $74,000 _ $73,000 $72,000 $71,000 $364,939 Hawks Park Restroom/Concession $110,000 $110,000 Rotary Park Redesign $20,000 $20,000 Hawks Park Walkway Lighting $20,000 $20,000 Sidewalk Infill $41,300 $41,300 US 1 Median Landscaping $100,000 $100,000 US 1 Median Irrigation $75,000 $75,000 Current Year Unreserved $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $500 Parks and Recreation $8403000 960,306 Totals $120;306 $441,339 $74,100 $73,100 $72,100 $71,100 $731,739 PUBLIC WORKS: Adoptcd on Datc: 01/02/2012 Ordinancc No. 2012 0 02 5 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN _ _ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Project* Fiscal Year 2010-20111 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total $500;000 Road Repaving $1-50,000 $202,694 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500.000 $2,202,694 Signalize SR442 @ I-95 $287,516 $287,546 $287,546 30th Street Sidewalk $573,128 $573,128 US 1 Sidewalk Survey& Deaigfr $475009000 $1,500,000 Indian River Blvd. Extension(approx. 1 mile) $1,601,160 $4,604,160 $4,604,160 US 1 Sidewalk Construction $1,100,000 $1,100,000 Flagler Avenue Sidewalk Construction $386,665 $386,665 $N-391i706 $500,000 $5,541,706 Public Works Totals $573,428 $1,650,008 $202,694 $6,491,706 $886,665 $500,000 $500,000 $8,581,065 $4469334 2011 2 $4259663190 $16,000,000 $9,700000 $43-1753040 $45306439-74 $2,223,787 $9,718,162 $8,274,659 $17,468,618 $11,330,953 $6,204,953 $52,997,345 *Projects in Fiscal Years 2013-2016 2014-2017 are currently unfunded. Source: City of Edgewater Planning Division,2011 2012 Adopted on Datc: 04/02/2012 Ordinancc No. 2012 0 02 6 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS EL ■ ENT Table 2: 20016 2013-2017 Volusia County School District Five-Year Work Program Project Type Fiscal Year 2041-2012 I 2012-2013 ] 2013-2014 I 2014-2015 ( 2015-2016 2016-2017 New Construction None without additional revenue Total - - _ - - - - Major Projects at Existing Schools and Facilities : . _. _, -- •- 250,000 250;000 Portables-Lease X 6_8-000 000 2 ;00 50 0 250;000 2 ;00 500 450,000 200,000 200.000 200,000 200,000 Portables-Move and Compliance 400 000 400;000 300;000 300;000 3003000 350 000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Various Schools-Minor Projects 4 008 4,300,000 4,300;000 4,300;000 4,300,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1 000,000 1.000.000 1 000,000 Various Facilities-Facilities Review Projects 238 nrn 435005000 4,500;000 1, ,00 5000 4-50000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2 500,000 Total _-538-800 6,7005000 6505000 6,600,000 9;400,000 4.300,000 3,950,000 3,950,000 3,950,000 3,950,000 Facilities Management Facilities Management—Various Projects 4558100� 43581 5000 4-581 ,581 ;000 1,581000 15000 ' 1,250,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1.000,000 Technology Network,EDP&Communications Equipment 5500 , 4,500,000 45500,000 1,500,000 4,500,000 2,360,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 System Wide Equipment&Vehicles Various Schools&Departments Furniture& Equipment 8005000 8005000 8005000 8005000 300.000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300.000 Buses Transportation Dept—Bus Replacement 4,116,030 454165030 44165030 3,125,000 3,125,000 3,125,000 Transfers Transfers—Debt Service 51,601,151 51,598,273 51,599,887 51,603,928 51,600,238 51,328,734 51,267,082 51.273.646 51,270,871 30,669,295 Transfers-General Fund 4,775077250 4-7-;-50,7250 47750,77250 17 50 1771.7 '7'/5!1'/50 15,507,250 13,007,250 10,507,250 8,007,250 5,507,250 Adoptcd on Date: 04/02/2012 Ordinancc No. 2012 0 02 7 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Project Type Fiscal Year 20444012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total Transfers 69,105,523 69,107,137 69,111,178 69,4075488 ' 66,835,984 64,274,332 61,780,896 59,278,121 36,176,545 Totals 84 , 481 822,686,523 86,454,167 86,708,208 89,204,518 75,045,984 75.640.362 72,155,896 69.653,121 46.551.545 Source:Volusia County School District,5-Year Work Program Adopted 09/13/11 09/11/12 Each capital improvement project is described briefly in Table 1. In addition, the reason the project is identified and estimated total project cost is provided. For ease of review, the projects have been grouped by facility type. As indicated, capital improvement projects have been identified for general, public safety, sanitary sewer, potable water, stormwater, parks and recreation, and transportation facilities. It should be noted that the capital improvement projects contained in Table 1 are not inclusive of all the anticipated capital expenditures by the City during the planning period. Table 1 is limited only to those major components identified by the preceding elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan (CP)in order to analyze development impacts and trends at a level of detail which is both manageable and fairly accurate. The cost estimates for the capital improvements indicated in this Element were developed using standard engineering practice regarding construction costs, in conjunction with information derived from actual construction costs of similar projects, certified bid documents on similar projects and engineering cost estimates conducted on similar projects. 2. Existing Financial Resources The first step in planning capital improvements, as well as arranging the necessary financing through the budgeting process, is to inventory the major sources of funding available to the City. Thc3c major sourcc3 of funding arc expected to contribute a total rcvcnuc sum of $32,916,233 in fi3cal year 2012. The revenue sources listed below comprises a working inventory for which the City's ability to fund the needed capital improvements will be assessed. In addition, the current status of each revenue source currently uscd by the City i3 iridieoed. It is important to note that the list below includes all of the major financial resources available to the City and is not limited to the funds which will be used for the capital improvement projects identified in the 5year Schedule of Improvements included in this Element. These currently utilized financial resources comprise, in part, the revenue sources which will be used to fund the identified capital improvements projects. Adopted on Date: 04/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 8 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS_ELEMENT 3. Local Revenue Sources a. Property Taxes (Ad Valorem) Property taxes are normally based on a millage rate (i.e. one mill equates to $1 per $1000 of assessed value, or .1%),which is then applied to the taxable value of all real property, as well as all other tangible personal property. The revenue from ad valorem taxes may be used to fund both operating costs and capital projects, unless prohibited by local policies. Provisions at the State level exist for raising the millage rate above the 10-mill cap set by local referendum for debt service or provision of municipal-type services within the City. CURRENT STATUS: As thc major sourcc of revenue for the City, ad valo cm taxes account for approximately 35% of the City's annual budget for thc General Fund. The City's current millage rate for the General Revenue Fund is set at approximately 6.17 taxable value) of$582,726,592. b. Public Utility or User Charges The revenue from these charges is generated primarily as a result of the rates charged to City residents of utilization of City-owned utilities such as water, sewer, stormwater and solid waste removal/disposal. Revenue from these operations include user fees, miscellaneous customer service charges and interest income. CURRENT STATUS: The expected public utility revenue for fiscal ycar 2012 i3 estimated to be approximately$11,659,227. c. Other taxes, fees,and charges This category of revenue source includes special assessments, various administrative fees and other charges for using services or facilities owned and operated by the City. Some examples of these charges are public document sales, property appraisal fees, fines and forfeitures, permit and license fees, City fund interest income, City property sale income, rental income and all private contributions (real estate,gifts, donations, etc) to the City. CURRENT STATUS: Approximately 2.9% of thc City's Gcncral Fund revenues are gcncratcd from these sources. In fiscal year 2012, thc sum of$342,886 i3 expected to be gcncratcd by these fund sources. d. Franchise Fees The City currently charges a franchise fee (based on the applicable gross revenues charged) for utility services,which are provided by private companies within the City. Adoptcd on Datc: 01/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 9 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVIMENTSELEMENT CURRENT STATUS: Approximately 9.2% of the City's General Fund revenues are generated from this source. For fiscal year 2012, it is anticipated that $1,100,000 in revenue will be generated from this funding source. e. Public Service or Utility Tax A municipality may levy a tax on the purchase of electricity, metered or bottled gas, water, cable television and telecommunication services. The tax may be levied upon only the purchases within the municipality and may not exceed ten (10) percent of the applicable payments received by the seller of the taxable item from the purchaser of the purchase of such service. previously mentioned applicable and available utility services,with the exception of cable television service3. The City presently charge3 ten (10) percent of revenues for electricity, gas and water, and seven (7) percent of revenues for telecommunication3. For fiscal year 2012, the City anticipates receiving $2,031,484 in public service or utility tax revenue, which amounts to approximately 16.81%of the c3timated General Fund revenue. f. Special Source of Revenue Additional funding mechanisms are sometimes required due to the availability of existing revenue sources and/or the project priorities assigned by the City Council. The options available to the City regarding alternate sources of revenue for funding capital improvement projects are listed below. 1) System Development of Impact fees. Fees which are charged in advance of new development to pay for infrastructure needs, but not operating costs, resulting directly from the new development. The fees must be equitably allocated to the specific group(s) which directly benefit from the capital improvements. In addition, the assessment levied must fairly reflect the true cost of the capital improvements. CURRENT STATUS: The City currently charges impact fees for police, fire, fee revenues (including interest income on fund balances) are expected to be generated during fiscal year 2012. g. Special Assessment Similar to impact fees, special assessments are charged to residents, agencies or areas which directly benefit from the provision of a new service or facility by the City. For example, the construction of a gravity sewer system for an existing neighborhood may be Adopted on Date: 04/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 10 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT financed through a special assessment to the neighborhood's individual homeowners rather than through a revenue fund of the City. The requirement that all of the City's residents fund the new sewer system through a City revenue source is not considered equitable. CURRENT STATUS: The City currently has two special assessments in the Florida Shores area, one for sewer and one for paving. The sewer assessment was started in November 1992 and the paving assessment was started in November 1991. The long term debt service associated with the special assessment bonds was paid off in fiscal year 2010. h. Borrowing Occasionally, many local governments are required to resort to borrowing funds to pay for capital improvements due to their extremely high cost. Usually, either long-term or short-term financing is used to provide these funds. The short-term financing option is normally handled by local banks and is used to raise the required revenue for periods of one to five years. The more customary method is to authorize long-term bond issues, which range in length from five to thirty years. Listed below are several types of bond issues available to the City. 1) General Obligation Bonds. These are bonds which are backed by the full faith and credit of the local government, and are required to be approved by a voter referendum. Since these bonds are secured by the taxing power of government, they generally offer lower interest rates than other bonds. The revenues collected from ad valorem taxes on real estate, as well as other sources of revenue are used to service the government's debt. General obligation bonds should be used to fund capital improvements which benefit the whole City rather than specific areas or groups of citizens. CURRENT STATUS: The City currently has no outstanding general obligation-beftel.s7 I Iowever, the City has $395,000 in outstanding general obligation notes. 2) Revenue Bonds. The revenue obtained from the issuance of these bonds is normally used to finance publicly owned facilities such as water treatment and wastewater treatment facilities. The charges collected from the users of the facilities are used directly to retire the bond obligations. This basically allows the capital project to be self-supporting. It should be noted that the interest rates generally tend to be higher than those of general obligation bonds. The issuance of the bonds may be approved by the City Council without a voter referendum. Adopted on Date: 01/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 11 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CURRENT STATUS: The City ha3 issued several revenue bonds to fund the improvements to its water and wa3tewater facilities. The bond revenues arc dcpo3ited into Enterprise Trust Fund accounts for each of the utilitic3, charges are then u3cd to service the debt. The total annual debt service on these bond3 i3 a3 follow3: 2012 $818,580 2013 $823,690 2011 $827,950 2015 $826,360 2016 $775,519 Total $4,072,099 3) Industrial Revenue Bonds. This type of bond, though issued by a local government,is actually assumed by companies or industries that use these funds to construct facilities. The low interest rates associated with this type of bond (due to their tax exempt status) makes it particularly attractive to industry. The advantages to the local government are that the private sector is responsible for the retirement of the debt and that the new employment opportunities are created in the community. CURRENT STATUS: The City has not i33ued any Industrial Revenue 4. State Sources The City depends on annual disbursements from the State government to supplement its revenue sources. The revenue sources discussed above represent those funds generated by City levies which may be collected and disbursed at the local level. The revenue sources discussed in this section represent those funds which are: (1) generated locally, but collected and later reimbursed to the City by the State; (2) adopted as a local option tax or license fee, collected and reimbursed by the State; or (3) shared by the State in the form of grants to the local government, but originate from State general revenues. The amounts available from these sources may vary widely from year to year depending on legislative actions. a. Revenue Sharing Trust Fund This component of revenue consists of 1.075 percent of sales and use tax collections, 12.5 percent of the State alternative fuel use decal fee collections, and the remainder from the one-cent municipal fuel tax. The sales and use tax collections were substituted for the cigarette tax revenues that previously were used for this fund by the Florida Adopted on Date: 01/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 12 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN_ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Legislature. The municipal fuel tax funds are restricted for transportation related expenditures. CURRENT STATUS: The City anticipates receiving $636,794 from this revenue source in the fiscal year 2012. Of this revenue, 63.8% comes from the sales and use tax (35.8%) is generated by the one cent municipal fuel tax. Thi3 revenue source is - - _, - - :. - :: : - .°2% of the City'3 General Fund revenuc3 in fiscal year 2012. b. Other Shared Revenue This category of revenue sources includes several major financial resources which, like the Revenue Sharing Trust Fund, are shared between City, County and State agencies. The following taxes and licensing fees generate a large portion of the total annual revenue for the City's General Fund. 1) Sales Tax — The current sales tax in the State is 6%, and is levied on retail sales, and such things as commercial rentals, admission fees to entertainment facilities, and motor vehicle sales. The collection is returned to the Cities and Counties in accordance with specific formulae. The variables of the formulae, in the case of cities, include the population of the municipality, as well as the total and unincorporated population of the County. CURRENT STATUS: The City's portion of the State 3alcs tax is expected to amount to approximately $901,215 in fiscal year 2012 which represents 7.53% of the City's General Fund evcnuc budget for that year. c. Mobile Home Licenses Mobile Home licenses currently range from $31.60 to $86.60, depending on what time length is established in the rate structure. Each City shares in the allocation of the revenues from this source based on the number of units located in the City. The City in turn shares a portion of the revenue with the local school board. This has proven to be a relatively stable revenue source over time. 2012 amounts to approximately $15,000 which rcprcacnts lcs3 than 1% of the General Fund revenue budget. Adopted on Date: 01/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 13 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHEht_IS VE PLA I� CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT d. Local Option Taxes Currently, there are four (4) possible sources of revenue available to the City within this category. All of the funds are generated locally, but the funds are collected and disbursed by the Florida Department of Revenue. The City currently shares in only one (1) of these revenue sources. CURRENT STATUS: The City's share of thi3 revenue source estimated for fi3cal year 2012 i3 approximately $409,490 which amounts to 3.42% of the City'3 2012 General Fund revenues. e. Alcoholic Beverage License The Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco for the State of Florida administers the issuance of licenses associated with the sale and/or consumption of alcoholic beverages. The State collects in excess of $37 million annually from this fee. Of this amount, a portion is returned to counties and municipalities as a State shared revenue. CURRENT STATUS: The City's share of thi3 revenue source i3 anticipated to amount to approximately $15,000 in fiscal year 2012 which is less than 1% of the City's General Fund revenues. f. Other Sources of Shared Revenues. The City also receives other shared revenues from both the County and other government agencies. These revenues include the Motor Fuel Tax Rebate, the Federal Excise Tax, and the County Business Tax Receipt fees. anticipated to amount to: a. Motor Fuel Tax Rebate: $5,000 b. County Bu3inc33 Tax Receipt Fcc3: $7,500 c. VOCA Grant $35,000 d. Street Light Maintenance $25,000 e. Other Transportation $27,500 £ PS Manatee Mitigation $57,000 The sum of these revenue sources amount3 to les3 than 1% of the City'3 fiscal year 2012 General Fund revenues. Adopted on Date: 04/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 14 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT C. FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS AND LOANS The system by which Federal general revenue sharing was formerly provided (U.S. State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972) has been substantially modified. The Federal funds are now available through allocations to the state agencies which administer and monitor block grants or disbursed by federal agencies as block grants directly to state and local agencies, as well as other eligible organizations and individuals. The purpose of the block grants program is to allow recipients greater freedom in the actual funds, though the funds must still be used for projects in specific categories. Since these funds require the competitive applications be submitted in order to receive an allocation, the grant monies are usually non-recurring and cannot accurately be projected for annual budgeting purposes. A partial list of available Federal grant sources is shown in Figure 1. Other grants and loans are administered at the State level, with State Executive Departments acting as "pass-through agencies" for federally funded projects. The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) is an example of a federally funded grant project. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development administers this program and allocates 70% of its CDBG funds to "entitlement communities", or the larger urban areas. These communities must apply for grants for financing specific projects from a list of eligible activities outlined in Title I statutes. These projects include infrastructure improvements, housing projects and commercial revitalization. The remaining 30% of the grant funds are allocated to State pass-through agencies such as the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) in the State of Florida. DEO administers these grants for the same types of projects mentioned previously,but restricts their availability to small cities and counties. In addition to block grants, there are several direct loan programs available at the Federal level, but their applicability to capital projects is extremely limited. State loans however, are usually available to finance capital projects such as land acquisition for low-income housing. DEO administers loans and grants for these projects to eligible governments through its Bureau of Housing. CURRENT STATUS: The City has received a FEMA grant in the amount of $1,141,257 for the replacement of Fire Station 55, as well as a grant from Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in the amount of $80,306 for YMCA IIVAC replacement, and a grant from the Florida Department of Transportation in the amount of$110,119 for the 30th Street sidewalk. The City also received a grant Y'a . . _ . Adopted on Date: 01/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 15 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAFITALIMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Figure 1: Federal Grant Agencies and Program Titles AGENCY TITLE Department of Commerce Public Works and Development Facilities Support for Planning Organizations Public Works Impact Projects Public Telecommunications Facilities Construction and Planning Department of Children& Families Community Health Concerns Department of Housing and Urban Development Housing Development Grants Community Development Block Grant/Entitlement Community Development Block Grant/Small Cities Program Department of Interior Outdoor Recreation: Acquisition, Development and Planning Urban Park and Recreation and Recovery Program Department of Transportation Urban Mass Transportation Capital Improvement Grants Urban Mass Transportation Technical Studies Grant Environmental Protection State Revolving Loan Fund (DFR) Program Agency Comprehensive Estuarine Management SOURCE: "Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance", Government Printing office, Washington, D.C. Adopted on Datc: 04/02/2012 Ordinancc No. 2012 0 02 16 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT D. LOCAL POLICIES AND PRACTICES To guide the location and timing of land development, local policies and practices are used, particularly in support of the goals, objectives and policies of the Future Land Use Element. Obviously, State agencies and water management districts which provide public facilities within the City's jurisdiction may influence these policies and practices. One such influence was found to be generated by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) 5year Transportation Plan. This influence stemmed from the fact that several roadways within the City's jurisdiction are part of the state highway system, and therefore are largely the financial responsibility of the FDOT. Plans for the improvement of some of these roadways may be included in the before mentioned 5:year Transportation Plan. However, there are other such roadways not included in the Plan. Either scenario affects the capacity of the roadways, which in turn affects the level and intensity of development,as well as the degree of financial commitment for which the City must plan. In the absence of improvement plans by FDOT, special provisions may be made when the City desires improvement of a State road to maintain local levels of service standards. These provisions may include the City expending funds for roadway improvements or providing FDOT with the funds, either of which may be collected through an impact fee. In this section, many of the local practices and policies used by the City are described in terms of their general concept and the circumstances surrounding their use. The policies and practices both used in the past and currently in use are identified. Policies and practices not in use which have the potential for being used by the City are discussed in a later section of the CIE. 1. LOS Standards LOS standards indicate the degree of service provided, or proposed to be provided by public facilities based on their operational characteristics. Basically, the LOS indicates the capacity per unit of demand for each public facility. Therefore, the LOS is a summary of the existing or desired public facility conditions. Chapter 163, F.S. requires LOS standards to be included for all public facilities addressed by local governments in their CP. These LOS standards are to be established for the specific purpose of issuing permits or development orders to ensure that adequate capacity is available and will be maintained in public facilities for future development. LOS standards can affect both the timing and location of development by encouraging development of those areas which have public facilities with excess capacity. In addition, development is not allowed unless the needed facilities and services are available. This development and provision of services usually occur in a phased sequence over a period of time. The City has adopted formal LOS standards with the completion of their CIP. Therefore, the LOS standards as outlined in the various elements of the CIP have been listed below. CURRENT STATUS: Adopted on Date: 04/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 17 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Sanitary Sewer: 204 gallons per equivalent residential unit per day Solid Waste: 2.5 pounds per capita per day Stormwater: Level A—No significant street flooding Level B—No major residential yard flooding Level C—No significant structure flooding Level D—No limitation on flooding (Based on 25-year/24-hour storm event) Potable Water: 204 gallons per equivalent residential unit per day Collector Roadways: LOS D for peak hour volumes Arterial Roadways: LOS D for peak hour volumes Limited Access Road: LOS B Guidelines for Recreational Facilities: Facility Unit of Measure Parkland 5 acres/1,000 persons Baseball/Softball 1 field/4,000 persons Basketball Court 1 court/5,000 persons Tennis Court 1 court/3,500 persons Handball/Racquetball Court 1 court/4,000 persons Community Center 1 facility/30,000 persons Multi-Purpose/Soccer 1 field/4,000 persons Shuffle Board Court 1 court/1,500 persons Bocci Ball Court 1 court/10,000 persons Volley Ball Court 1 court/5,000 persons Boat Ramps 1 ramp/4,700 persons Bike/Pedestrian Trail 1 mile/4,000 persons Fitness Trails 1/14,000 persons Activities Center 1/15,000 persons Gymnasium N/A 2. Capital Improvements Program (CIP) A Capital Improvements Program is a plan for capital expenditures to be incurred each year over a fixed period of years to meet anticipated facility improvements and needs. The CIP identifies each capital project or other capital expenditures anticipated by the City, as well as presenting estimates of the resources needed to finance the project. Adopted on Date: 04/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 18 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS EVENT The CIP is designed to be consistent with the CIE of the local CP because it reflects the goals, objectives and policies of the Element and its implementation strategy, including the 5- year Schedule of Improvements. In addition, the CIP is not restricted to only those public facilities addressed in the CP, as is the CIE. The first year of a CIP becomes the annual capital budget with longer range capital expenditures identified for the 5-year program. The capital budget encompasses enacting appropriations for those capital projects delineated for the first year of the CIP. The CIP, similar to CIE,is reviewed on an annual basis. CURRENT STATUS: The City is currently preparing a CIP with 5 year increments within which arc contained annual capital budgets. 3. Impact Fees Impact fees are imposed by many local governments on new developments to offset the costs of new public facilities necessitated by the development. Local government may use this strategy as one method of implementing the CIE. Chapter 163, F.S. includes impact fees as an innovative technique that may be integrated into the land development regulations. Impact fee development is a logical outgrowth of the CIE preparation. A rational basis for developing an impact fee ordinance comes from the assessment of the local government's capital improvement needs and its capability to provide for those needs which is required by Chapter 163 F.S. Infill development location and timing may be affected and controlled through the use of impact fees. This is because infill development usually occurs in those areas having capital facilities with excess capacity. If the local government chooses not to recover the costs of capital facilities in underutilized service areas, infill development may be encouraged by the absence of impact fees on developments proposed within those areas. CURRENT STATUS: The City currently has impact fee resolutions for providing water, wastewater,recreation, Fire and Police services. 4. Utility Service Areas The delineation of utility service areas within a comprehensive plan or CIP may be used to describe areas where local governments intend to provide public facilities and services. When used in conjunction with a CIE and CIP, utility service areas can be used as a tool to coordinate the timing of public facilities and service provision within areas planned for development. Adopted on Date: 01/02/2012 19 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN __. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Additionally, the following benefits may be the result of using utility service areas: a) Encourage efficient and orderly growth patterns; b) Preserve agricultural and environmentally sensitive areas;and c) Support control on facility extensions . . _ . City's CP,but only for water and wa3tcwatcr facilitic3 and 3crvicc3. 5. User Charges and Connection Fees User charges are designed to recover the costs of public facilities or services from those who benefit from them. Many areas of local government employ the use of user charges. Monthly sewer charges paying for the operation and maintenance of wastewater facilities as well as retiring debt service on revenue bonds is a good example of user charge usage. This technique may also be applied to transportation, potable water, solid waste, recreation and parking facilities and services. These charges may be designed to vary, depending on the quantity and location of the services rendered, in order to affect the pace and pattern of development. In other words, the greater the distance from the service area, the higher the user charge. CURRENT STATUS: Uscr chargcs and connection fccs arc currently used for wa3tcwatcr, potable water, solid waste and recreation facility maintenance. 6. Concurrency Management System This controls the timing and location of development by conditioning new development approvals on evidence that sufficient facilities and services are present or will be provided in order to maintain adopted LOS standards. In effect, this implements Chapter 163, F.S. that requirc3 public facilities to be available to suppor - - '-- • - - - :- - •--- •- Therefore, development approval becomes contingent on the ability of local governments to provide facilities and services, and furthermore, may require the development itself to furnish the facilities and services in order to maintain the adopted LOS standards. Additional benefits associated with a Concurrency Management System are as follows: a) Supports the consistency of the CIE with the Future Land Use Element, b) Provides for the orderly expansion of public facilities; c) Stabilizes capital improvement expenditures and taxing structures for capital improvements;and d) Reduces the possibility of damage to the environment from the use of overburdened facilities. Adopted on Datc: 04/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 20 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Typically, the Concurrency Management System interacts with the development approval process by requiring that all zoning, subdivision or planned unit development (PUD) approval be granted only upon demonstrated compliance with the system. The building permit stage is another level at which a Concurrency Management System may function. In this context, the Concurrency Management System may control development in areas that are already approved, but not as yet built on, such as pre-platted lands. CURRENT STATUS: The City has developed a Concurrency Management System as part of this Element. 7. Mandatory Dedication or Fees in Lieu Of The City may require, as a condition to plat approval, that subdivision developers dedicate a portion of the land within the development to be used for public purposes such as roads, parks and schools. Dedication may be made to the governing body, or to a private group such as a homeowners association. When a subdivision is of such small scale or topographic conditions that a land dedication cannot reasonably be required, the City may require that the subdivider pay a fee in lieu of dedication which is equivalent to the amount of land that otherwise would have been dedicated by the developer. The fee may be deposited into a separate account for use in the future towards the provision of such facilities. As a result of the public facility provision, the adjacent area benefiting from the initiative would likely become more attractive to development. Therefore, the acquired service potential may be used to encourage growth in desired areas. CURRENT STATUS: The City currently requires mandatory dedications of land or fccs in lieu of. 8. Moratoria A moratorium, or stop-gap ordinance, is used to temporarily halt or freeze development in an area for a specified period of time on an emergency basis. The ordinance may be imposed on certificate of uses, building permits, development approvals, or governmental services such as potable water connections or wastewater system extensions and/or connections. The moratorium normally is imposed for a "reasonable time" to allow the necessary planning activities to take place pending comprehensive plan preparation, adoption or amendment. The State of Florida's legal system has found development moratoria to be a valid measure of last resort in the protection of local public health, safety and welfare when adopted in accordance with applicable procedures. Some other considerations in adopting a moratorium include: Adopted on Date: 04/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 21 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL LMPROVEMENTS ELEM ENT a) Determining legal status of existing permit applications and approvals to determine the extent of "vested rights" for those developments approved prior to ordinance adoption; b) Specifying the geographic extent of the moratorium (whether it will be City wide, or limited to specific hazard areas with existing service insufficiencies); and c) Specifying the time frame and conditions under which the moratorium will be imposed. CURRENT STATUS: The City is not currently impoaing any moratoria. E. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 1. Fiscal Assessment In this section, an examination is made of the City's ability to fund the capital improvements listed in Table 1. The purpose of the examination is to determine whether sufficient revenue will be available using the existing budgeting framework utilized by the City to fund the required improvements at the time when they are needed. The assessment process estimates future revenue receipts which the City will use to fund capital improvements, then balances these revenues against the anticipated capital improvement expenditures. Using this process, it becomes possible to quantify annual revenue surpluses and shortfalls, thereby providing a basis for examining opportunities for financing the required capital improvements. The examination of these opportunities is included in the next portion of this section, entitled"Summary and Recommendations". In addition to the direct cost for capital improvements, this section will review the fiscal impacts of the capital improvements identified in the other CP elements upon the actual operation of the City departments responsible for facility management. This will include costs for additional personnel and routing operation/maintenance activities. It should be noted that this assessment includes only those items planned for in other CP elements. a. Accounting System The accounting system employed by the City records financial transactions in individual accounts called "funds". Records for each fund provide a complete accounting of fund assets, liabilities, reserves, equities, revenues and expenditures. The following is a brief description of the funds which the City has established for capital improvement financing. GENERAL FUND: The General Fund is the basic operating fund of the City. It accounts for all revenues and expenditures used to finance the traditional services associated with a municipal government which are not accounted for in other funds. These services include police and fire protection, civil defense, emergency rescue services, street services, parks and Adopted on Datc: 01/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 22 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT recreation, building safety, general administration and any other activity for which a specific special fund has not been created. ENTERPRISE FUND: Enterprise Funds are established to account for the financing of self-supporting municipal activities which render services on a user charge basis to the general public. In the City, the water and sewer utilities, refuse collection, and stormwater operations are operated as enterprise activities. The significant characteristic of an Enterprise Fund is that the accounting system makes it possible to determine whether the activity is operated at a profit or loss. All reports of Enterprise Funds are self-contained. In this way, creditors, legislators, and the general public can evaluate the performance of the municipal enterprise on the same basis as investor- owned enterprise in the same industry. b. Projected Revenues The City's tax base is was projected to increase decrease for 2012 2013, assuming a 3.00% rate of growth starting in 2014 for the adjusted taxable value of property (including new construction), as indicated below. The City's assessment ratio is projected to remain stable at 95%. Table 3: Adjusted Taxable Income Projections Tax Base 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Adjusted taxable 582,726,592 income 582,726,592 592,777,766 592,777,766 600,208,390 618,214,641 636,761,080 SOURCE: City of Edgewater Finance Dept. Ad valorem tax yields were projected assuming the fiscal year 2012 2013 rate of millage and the average annual increase (3.00%) in adjusted taxable value over the next five years. It should be noted that the five-year average rate for millage amounts to a rate of 6.47 per $1,000 of taxable property value. Table 4: Ad Valorem Tax Yield Projections Tax Base 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Ad Valorem Tax Yield 3,581,729 3,660,403 3,581,729 3,770,241 3,883,348 4,119,844 Adopted on Datc: 01/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 23 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE_PLAN _ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT SOURCE: City of Edgewater Finance Dept.Assume a collection of 95%of the total ad valorem tax billings. Table 5 indicates the revenues expected to be available to the City to finance the expenditures and capital improvements for the years 2012 2016 2013-2017. Revenue projections are based on past trends and anticipated changes in funding sources. These amounts are represented in 2012 2013 dollars. Table 5: Revenue Projections Affecting Capital Improvements 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 FUND General Fund Ad Valorem $3,581,729 $3,660,403 $3,581,729 $3,883,348 $3,999,848 $4,119,844 Franchise $47-144070490 $915,000 $1,133,000 $1,166,990 $1,202,000 $1,238,060 Fees State Shared $1,553,009 $1,599,599 $1,617,587 $1,697,015 $1,747,925 Revenues $1,733,731 $1,785,743 $1,839,315 $1,894,495 $1,951,330 Utility Tax $2,031,181 $2,031,484 $2,092,429 $2,155,201 $2,219,857 $2,286,453 Other $1,440,786 $1,440,786 $1,484,010 $1,528,530 $1,574,386 $1,621,617 Subtotal: $95707,008 $9,890 $1053845656 $10,693,106 $11501358-99 $9,781,404 $10,076,911 $10,573,384 $10,890,586 $11,217,304 Enterprise Funds Wastewater $3,565,287 $7,339,776 $3,672,246 $3,782,413 $3,895,885 $4,012,762 Adopted on Date: 04/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 24 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Refuse $3,187,229 $3,187,229 $3,563,197 $3,670,093 $3,780,196 $3,893,602 Water $3,459,115 $3,459,415 $3,563,197 $3,670,093 $3,780,196 $3,893,602 Stormwater $' 12mo0 $1,422,100 $1,464,763 $1,508,706 $1,553,967 $1,600,586 Net Bond Proceeds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $12,009,031 $12,647,653 $13,029,143 $1354205017 $13,822,612 $15,783,520 $12,649,653 $13,029,143 $13,420,017 $13,822,612 Total Revenues $2157465039 $22,538,420 $23,410,799 $24,113,123 $24,836,511 $25,564,924 $22,726,564 $23,602,527 $24,310,603 $25,039,916 The Enterprise Fund projected revenues for each account include anticipated income from user charges, connection fees, impact fees, assessment receipts and customer service charges. The revenue projections for wastewater and water user charges and connection fees are based on current individual fee amounts (average monthly charge and connection fees) and projected total service connections. Solid waste user charge revenue projections are based on current average monthly charges also. The amount shown for net bond proceeds represents the use of bond proceeds which are anticipated to be issued for major capital projects. The amounts shown reflect the year when the proceeds are estimated to be encumbered for the project and not the use of the proceeds deposited in the construction fund for financing the project. c. Projected Expenditures The projected expenditures have been separated into three categories for the purpose of this assessment: (i) scheduled capital improvement project expenditures; (ii) capital improvement debt service expenditures; and (iii) operating cost expenditures. The first category of expenditure represents the direct cost of those capital improvements expected to be incurred annually, those identified by the other CP elements, and those identified by the City's Capital Improvements Program (in addition to the CIP projects already identified by the other CP elements). Table 6 lists these projected expenditures by Fund for 2012 2016 2013-2017. Adopted on Datc: 04/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 25 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Table 6: Expenditure Projections for Scheduled Capital Improvements 2011 Gam 2042 2043 2014 2015 2016 Forward 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 FUND General Fund $1,770,306 $6,231,706 $ 00,000 $500,000 $500;000 Annual Capital Expenditures $1,169,312 $644,033 $6,565,806 $959,765 $572,100 $571,100 Enterprise Funds Annual Capital Expenses $162,066 $5,817,922 $4-5;2-50;000 $8,950,000 $3,4550,000 Water/Sewer $7,339,776 $300,000 $14,800,000 $8,800,000 $3450,000 $316,562 Public Works $958,853 $1,208,853 $1,458,853 $1,708,853 $1,958,853 $291,415 $600,000 Stormwater $775,500 $200,000 $250,000 $250,000 $225,000 $434693312 $2,511,333 $123678,644 $46,000,000 X003000 $431733000 Total Expenses $9,718,162 $8,274,659 $17,468,618 $11,330,953 $6,204,953 The second category includes the projected expenditures required to meet debt service requirements for outstanding bond issues, as well as planned future bond issues included in the revenue projects in Table 6. The future debt issues are anticipated by the City to provide Adopted on Datc: 04/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 26 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS MENT monies to fund the reclaimed water improvements as well as various general improvements. In addition to long-term indebtedness, the City utilizes short-term borrowing for minor capital expenditures. Table 7 lists the projected debt service expenditures by Fund. Table 7: Debt Service Expenditure Projections 2042 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 FUND $638,559 $115,711 $916,918 $86,153 0 General Fund $415,714 $448,092 $117,791 $119,570 $126,410 Enterprise Funds Wastewater $1,581,517 $1,612,783 State SRF Loan 2012 $1,528,319 $360,128 $360,128 $360,128 Water SunTrust JCI 2005 $92,594 SunTrust JCI 2013 $324,000 $493,000 $533,000 $576,000 $622,000 Wells Fargo Series 2009 #42 Wachovia Series 2009 $585,000 $610,000 $635,000 $655,000 $626,429 $626,429 BB&T SRF Refinance 2012 $240,000 $657,000 $671,000 $686,000 $701,000 BOA #265 $ 4;999 $514,000 Stormwater The debt service to fund the enterprise component of the CIP program consists entirely of revenue bonds and special assessment bonds. Based on the opinion of the City Council, this debt does not come under the current charter provisions of the City. With respect to the general debt associated with the General Fund, the current charter requires that the City not incur additional debt of more than .75% of the net taxable ad valorem property value during any forward moving five (5) year period unless such debt was approved by a referendum of eligible voters in a general election. Based on the current Charter provisions, the estimated debt service capacity assuming assessed valuation rates is as follows: Value for 2012 2013 $582,726,592 $869,698,616 Adopted on Datc: 01/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 27 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN _ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Charter Limitation at .75% $7,018,118 $6,522,740 The final category of expenditures contains the annual operating costs for providing the necessary facility improvements and services to the City's customers. These operating costs consist of the recurring expenses associated with the normal operation of capital facilities such as supplies, maintenance, personnel and utility costs associated with the assessed capital improvement needs. The operating costs have been assigned to the first year in which they are expected to be incurred based on the schedule of improvement contained in Table 6. Table 8 presents the annual operating expenditure of the City for years 2012 2016 2013- 2017. Table 8: Annual Operating Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 FUND General Fund $11,971,122 $12,207,802 $12,330,565 $12,700,482 $13,081,496 $13,473,94 Enterprise Fund Water/ Wastewater $8,231,380 $8,207,400 $8,478,321 $8,732,671 $8,994,651 $9,264,491 Public Works $3,187,2291 $3,012,390 $3,282,846 $3,381,331 $3,482,771 $3,587,254 Stormwater $4742271-00 $1,655,030 $1,464,763 $1,508,706 $1,553,967 $1,600,586 In order to assess the City's capability to fund the necessary capital improvement expenditures, a determination of revenue sufficiency must be made. This capability is shown by finding the difference between the projected annual revenues and expenditures for each Adopted on Datc: 01/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 28 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT fund the City uses to finance the capital improvements. The assessment results are shown in Table 9. Table 9: Fiscal Assessment No. 1 FUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 GENERAL FUND REVENUES $11,971,422 $12,207,802 $12,330,565 $12,700,482 $13,081,496 $13,473,941 EXPENDITURES $11,971,422 $12,207,802 $12,330,565 $12,700,482 $13,081,496 $13,473,941 BALANCE - - - - - - ENTERPRISE FUND WATER/WASTEWATER REVENUES $8,231,380 $8,207,400 $8,478,321 $8,732,671 $8,994,651 $9,264,491 EXPENSES $8,231,380 $8,207,400 $8,478,321 $8,732,671 $8,994,651 $9,264,491 BALANCE - - - - - - PUBLIC WORKS REVENUES $3,187,229 $3,012,390 $3,282,846 $3,381,331 $3,482,771 $3,587,254 EXPENSES $3,187,229 $3,012,390 $3,282,846 $3,381,331 $3,482,771 $3,587,254 BALANCE - - - - - - STORMWATER REVENUES $4742271-00 $1,655,030 $1,464,763 $1,508,706 $1,553,967 $1,600,586 EXPENSES $1,122,100 $1,655,030 $1,464,763 $1,508,706 $1,553,967 $1,600,586 BALANCE - - - - - - Adopted on Datc: 04/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 29 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN __ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Included in Table 9 are the projected revenues (as previously listed in Table 5) and expenditures (consisting of the sum of the cost and expenditures shown in Tables 6, 7 and 8). Improvement costs for transportation and recreation have been included in the General Fund, improvement costs for wastewater, water and solid waste are included in the Enterprise Fund, and stormwater improvement costs have been included in the Stormwater Fund. The balance of each fund indicates the difference between the projected revenues and expenditures. Revenue shortfalls for a given year are indicated by a negative balance. The City uses revenues from both the General and Enterprise Funds to meet annual operating expenses. The General Fund is primarily used for transportation and recreation/park operating services,while the Enterprise Fund is used for the operating costs associated with the Public Works and Utilities Departments. Supplemental funding is provided by the fees collected by the various departments from the persons directly receiving the service. The City-wide millage rate and the Enterprise Fund user charges are reviewed periodically by the City as part of its budgeting process. Adjustments are made in order to ensure that sufficient funds are available to meet expected expenses, including a reserve for contingency funds. In anticipation of future increases in operating costs, the City may desire to adjust the millage rate and/or user charges upward by small increments over a period of several years. This will initially provide additional operating reserves, which can later be used to offset operating expense increases as they occur and allow the City to moderate annual charges in the millage rates and user charges. The anticipated increases in ad valorem tax revenues for 2012 2016 2013-2017 are featured below in Table 10. Table 10: Anticipated Increase in Ad Valorem Tax Revenue Projections Tax Base 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Result of one-half mill increase over and above current $3,581,729 $3,941,972 $3,521329 $3,883,348 $3..999,848 $4,119,844 Ad-Valorem d. Summary and Recommendations Within this section, the projected revenue shortfalls as indicated in Table 9 are identified. Various methods of overcoming these revenue shortfalls are examined herein, and recommendations developed as to the most appropriate methods of balancing the revenue and expenditure streams for the City's funds. These balanced revenue/expenditure streams are shown in Table 9 and indicate the achievement of an economically feasible comprehensive plan. Adopted on Date: 04/02/2012 Ordinancc No. 2012 0 02 30 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE_PLAN _ _ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT General Fund: As shown in Table 9, the General Fund is projected to have a balanced budget during 2012 2016 2013-2017. Enterprise Fund: The Enterprise Fund is projected to have a balanced budget during 2012 2016. 2013-2017. The balancing of the projected revenue and expenditure streams within the Enterprise Fund will be accomplished by the following funding strategy changes: STORMWATER: 1. Apply for various grants from State agencies to assist with various projects; 2. Obtain short term financing via low interest loans;and 3. Carry forward any unexpected funds as revenue. In the event that some of the proposed sources are not attained, the following alternative strategies will be pursued; 1. Additional deferral of projects to later years; 2. Procurement of additional revenue bonds instead of funding projects on a "pay-as- you-go" basis; 3. Procurement of additional grant funding; 4. Procurement of a state revolving fund loan;and 5. Increase user fees for municipal services. Improved planning and coordination will be initiated among the City's utility departments in order to ensure that public facility and service provision is optimal for cost effectiveness. For example, department representatives will work together to encourage the provision of public facilities and services concurrently (where feasible), in order to limit the negative impacts of separate installation (i.e. construct water/sewer services prior to paving/ stormwater improvements). Also, other entities which share facilities with the City (such as FDOT and Volusia County) sharing the use of the U.S. 1 within the City limit(s) will be coordinated with regarding improvements to their shared facilities. Adoptcd on Datc: 01/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 31 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN__ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSELEMENT F. GOALS, OBJECTIVES,AND POLICIES The City shall undertake all actions necessary to ensure that needed public facilities and services are provided to all residents within the City's jurisdiction in a manner which maximizes the use of existing facilities, promotes orderly compact urban growth and protects the City's investments in its existing facilities. GOAL 1: Capital improvements will be provided to correct existing deficiencies, to accommodate projected future growth, and to replace obsolete or worn-out facilities, as indicated in the 5eear Schedule of Improvements delineated in this Element. Objective 1.1: Reserving Funds for Needed Future Capital Facilities.Ensure that a Five- Year Capital Improvements Program (CIP) shall be incorporated into the Annual Budget in order to reserve funds for needed future capital facilities. Policy 1.1.1: Preparation of the Five-year Capital Improvement Program. The City's Finance Director shall prepare the Five-Year CIP on an annual basis as part of the City's Annual Budget; it shall address all capital needs of the City. Policy 1.1.2: Municipal Department Heads and the CIE Annual Update. As a part of the annual update process for the Capital Improvements Element, municipal department heads shall provide input to the City Manager and Finance Director regarding capital improvement needs and the adequacy of existing and planned funding sources. Policy 1.1.3: Multi year Funding Strategy and New Funding Resources. As a part of the annual update process for the Capital Improvements Element the City shall focus on a multi-year funding strategy to identify new funding resources. Objective 1.2: Capital Improvements Classification. Shall include all projects identified in the CIP which are determined to be of relatively large scale and high cost ($25,000 or greater) in the 5.-year Schedule of Improvements as capital improvement projects;all other capital improvements shall be included in the 5eear Capital Improvements Program and annual capital budget. Policy 1.2.1: Debt Service and Operating Expenditures. The City shall, for accounting purposes, include this Element in conjunction with Debt Service and Operating expenditures. Policy 1.2.2: Scheduling and Funding Capital Improvements. The City shall, as a matter of priority, schedule and fund all capital improvements identified by the 5.-year Schedule of Improvements. Adopted on Datc: 0'1/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 32 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN __ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Policy 1.2.3: Reviewing the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (WSFWP). The City shall continue to adopt a CIP and annual budget as a part of its budgeting process. The City will review the CIP annually together with the WSFWP to include the water related projects identified for the first five years of the WSFWP. The program shall be "financially feasible" as defined in Florida Statutes. Policy 1.2.4: Capital Improvement Projects and Priority Ranking Guidelines. The proposed capital improvement projects shall be evaluated and ranked in order of priority according to the following guidelines: • the project is needed to protect public health and safety, to fulfill the City's legal commitment to provide facilities and services, to reduce waste of water resources, to reduce waste of water resources or to preserve or achieve full use of the existing facilities; • the project promotes the City's development of alternative water supplies, corrects water supply deficiencies or otherwise results in a reduction in future dependence on Upper Floridian aquifer water sources to support future growth of the City. • the project increases the efficiency of use of the existing facilities, prevents or reduces future improvement costs, provides service to developed areas lacking full service or promotes infill development; • the project represents a logical extension of facilities and services within a designated utility service area; • the project implements the policies of this Comprehensive Plan as they pertain to the concurrency requirements; and • the project is financially feasible. Objective 1.3: Proportionate Share. Ensure the proportionate share of facility improvements which are necessitated by future development in order to maintain adopted LOS standards shall be borne by those directly benefiting from the improvements. Policy 1.3.1: Implementing Impact Fee Programs. The City shall continue to implement its impact fee programs as conditions to providing utility services to new developments. Adoptcd on Datc: 04/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 33 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIV PLAN ___ _ __ __CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Policy 1.3.2: Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance. The City shall continue to implement its Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance. Policy 1.3.3: Future Development and Proportionate Costs. Future development will bear a proportionate cost of all capital improvements necessary to maintain LOS standards adequately. Policy 1.3.4: Private Contributions and the Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. The City shall rely upon private contributions as a funding source within the Fiveyear Schedule of Capital Improvements only when the obligation to fund a specific capital improvement is addressed in an enforceable development agreement or development order. The City shall not be responsible for funding capital improvements that are the obligation of the developer. If the developer fails to meet any capital improvement commitment that is programmed in the Fiveyear Schedule of Capital Improvements, a plan amendment to delete the capital improvement from the Schedule shall be required. Policy 1.3.5: New Development and Impact Fees.All new development,which has a direct or indirect impact on roads, schools, parks, potable water, or sewer, shall continue to be subject to impact fees collected and/or administered by the City. Monies collected as impact fees shall be spent to benefit the City's infrastructure. Objective 1.4: Managing Financial Resources. Will manage its financial resources to ensure the provision of needed capital improvements for previously issued development orders for future development and redevelopment. Policy 1.4.1: Issuance of Development Orders or Permits and Concurrency. The City will not issue development orders or permits unless public facilities (which meet the adopted LOS standards) needed to support development or redevelopment are available, or will be available concurrently with the impacts of the development. Policy 1.4.2: Maximum Ratio of Outstanding Indebtedness. The maximum ratio of outstanding indebtedness (for providing capital improvements) to the property tax base shall be limited by the City to no greater than .75%. Policy 1.4.3: Adoption of the Capital Improvements Program. The City shall continue to adopt a 5year Capital Improvements Program and annual budget as a part of its budgeting process. Policy 1.4.4: Funding to Finance Capital Improvements.The City will continue to apply for water, wastewater, solid waste and other available grants on an Adopted on Date: 01/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 34 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT annual basis to obtain funding to finance the provision of capital improvements. Policy 1.4.5: Limitation on the use of Revenue Bonds.The limitation on the use of revenue bonds as a percent of total debt shall follow applicable Florida statues and acceptable financial practices. Policy 1.4.6: Maximum Ratio of Total Debt Service. The maximum ratio of total debt service to total revenue shall follow applicable Florida statues and acceptable financial practices. Policy 1.4.7: Maximum Ratio of Outstanding Capital Indebtedness to Property Tax Base. The maximum ratio of outstanding capital indebtedness to property tax base shall follow applicable Florida statues and acceptable financial practices. Policy 1.4.8: Reviewing all Sources of Revenue and the Annual Budget Process. Before the annual budget process is initiated, the City shall review all sources of revenue not previously utilized as revenue and shall act to obtain and receive revenue from these potential sources where a benefit to the City can be predicted. Policy 1.4.9: Complying with State Law and the Management of Debt. The City shall comply with all State of Florida law regarding the management of debt. Objective 1.5: Issuance of Development Orders and Permits. Shall base all decisions regarding the issuance of development orders and permits on the coordination of the development requirements included in this CP, its land development regulations and ordinances, and the availability of public facilities needed to support such development at the time it is needed. Policy 1.5.1: LOS Standards. The City shall use the following LOS standards in reviewing the impacts of new development and redevelopment upon public facility provision in the City or in the City's Utility Service Area: Sanitary Sewer: 204 gallons per equivalent residential unit per day Solid Waste: 2.5 pounds per capita per day Stormwater Level A—No significant street flooding Level B—No major residential yard flooding Level C—No significant structure flooding Level D—No limitation on flooding (Based on 25-year/24-hour storm event) Adoptcd on Date: 04/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 35 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Potable Water: 204 gallons per equivalent residential unit per day Collector Roadways: LOS D for peak hour volumes Arterial Roadways: LOS D for peak hour volumes Limited Access Road: LOS B Guidelines for Recreational Facilities: Facility Unit of Measure Parkland 5 acres/ 1,000 persons Baseball/Softball 1 field/4,000 persons Basketball Court 1 court/5,000 persons Tennis Court 1 court/3,500 persons Handball/Racquetball Court 1 court/4,000 persons Community Center lfacility/30,000 persons Multi-Purpose/Soccer 1 field/4,000 persons Shuffle Board Court 1 court/1,500 persons Bocci Ball Court 1 court/10,000 persons Volley Ball Court 1 court/5,000 persons Boat Ramps 1 ramp/4,700 persons Bike/Pedestrian Trail 1 mile/4,000 persons Fitness Trails 1/14,000 persons Activities Center 1/15,000 persons Gymnasium N/A Policy 1.5.2: New Development, Redevelopment or Comprehensive Plan Amendments Guidelines. The City shall evaluate all proposed CP amendments and requests for new development or redevelopment according to the following guidelines as to whether the proposed action would: • contribute to a condition of public hazard as described in the Utilities Sub-elements; • exacerbate any existing condition of public facility capacity deficits as described in the Utilities Sub-elements, the Transportation Element and the Recreation and Open Space Element; • generate public facility demands that may be accommodated by capacity increases planned in the 5year Schedule of Improvements, Adopted on Date: 04/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 36 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN __ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT • conform to future land uses as shown on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), and utility service areas as described in the Utilities Sub-elements; • if public facilities are developer-provided, accommodate public facility demands based on adopted LOS standards; • if public facilities are provided, in part or whole, by the City, demonstrate financial feasibility, subject to this element; • represent a logical extension of facilities and service from the City to the urban fringe, or is compatible with the plans of the State agencies or the St. Johns River Florida Water Management District (SJRWMD) ;and • determination of future capital improvement needs shall be based on anticipated future growth or redevelopment patterns and whether a particular improvement advances the goals, policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 1.5.3: Land Use Development Orders and Concurrency. Land use development orders shall be granted only when facilities functioning at the adopted LOS exist, or will be available, concurrent with occupancy or use of such developed land with respect to sewer,water and stormwater, and within three years for recreation and transportation. Policy 1.5.4: Public and Private Capital Facilities and LOS Provision. The City shall require all public and private capital facilities to operate and provide service at the LOS adopted in this Comprehensive Plan for existing, previously issued development orders and future permitted development. Policy 1.5.5: Public Facilities and Services and Concurrency. The City shall continue to make public services and facilities available concurrent with the impacts of development. In cases of phased development, the City shall determine when public facilities and services are necessary to maintain concurrency. Objective 1.6: Coastal High Hazard Area. By December 2014, shall review amcnd its Land Development Code to evaluate limiting limit the size and density of developments in the coastal high-hazard area,as defined by the Coastal Management Element. Adopted on Date: 04/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 37 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PI AN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Policy 1.6.1: Constructing Public Facilities and the Coastal High Hazard Area. The City will not construct public facilities east of U.S. 1 unless no other feasible sites are available outside the coastal high-hazard area. Where it becomes necessary to construct public facilities in the coastal high-hazard area, the design of the facilities will incorporate flood proofing and additional structural support in order to ensure minimum damage from storms and hurricanes. Policy 1.6.2: Limiting Public Expenditures and the Coastal High Hazard Area. The City will limit public expenditures that subsidize development in coastal high-hazard areas except for the restoration and enhancement of natural resources. Objective 1.7: Adoption of Local Government and External Agency Plans. Adopt all applicable outside local government and external agency plans necessary to maintain and provide for LOS. Policy 1.7.1: Meeting School Capacity and Student Demands. The City hereby adopts by reference the Volusia County School District's Facilities 5-Year Work Program to meet anticipated school capacity and student demands projected by the County and municipalities based on the adopted LOS standards for public schools. Policy 1.7.2: Meeting Demand of State Transportation Facilities.The City hereby adopts by reference the Florida Department of Transportation's 5- Year Work Program to meet anticipated demand through improvement of State transportation facilities within the jurisdiction. Policy 1.7.3: Meeting Water Supply Demand and Needs. The City hereby adopts by reference the St. Johns River Water Management District's (SJRWMD) Water Supply Plan 2005 to meet anticipated water supply and demand needs within the jurisdiction. GOAL 2: Provide for a financially feasible public school facilities program. Objective 2.1: Level of Service Standards. Shall ensure that the capacity of schools is sufficient to support residential subdivisions and site plans at the adopted LOS standard. This LOS standard shall be consistent with the LOS standard adopted in the interlocal agreement entered into by the School Board and the local governments within Volusia County. Policy 2.1.1: Applying LOS Standards. The LOS standard adopted by the City shall be applied consistently by all local governments within Volusia County and by the School Board district-wide to all schools of the same type. Adoptcd on Datc: 01/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 38 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN _ _ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Policy 2.1.2: Florida Inventory of School House LOS Standards. Consistent with the interlocal agreement, the uniform, district-wide LOS standards are set as follows using FISH (Florida Inventory of School House) capacity based on the traditional school calendar • Elementary Schools: 115% of permanent FISH capacity for the concurrency service area; • K- 8 Schools: 115% of permanent FISH capacity for the concurrency service area; • Middle Schools: 115% of permanent FISH capacity for the concurrency service area; • High Schools: 120% of permanent FISH capacity for the concurrency service area;and • Special Purpose Schools: 100% of permanent FISH capacity. Policy 2.1.3 LOS for Specific Schools in Volusia County. Thc following schools shall achieve the adopted LOS on or before the identified date. Thc LOS presented in the following table is the tiered LOS that shall apply to that school unit the date noted in the table. Scheel LOS DATE Orange City Elementary 117% July 1,2012 Horizon Elementary 158% July 1,2012 126% July 1,2012 Osceola Elemcntary 117% July 1,2012 Ortona Elementary 150% July 1,2012 Ormond Beach Elementary 116% July 1,2012 Southwestern Middle 120% July 1. 2013 Ncw Smyrna Beach Middle 122°/ July 1,2011 (Note: This policy designates a tiered LOS for those schools that exceed the desired levels at the end of the Five year Capital Improvements Program.) Adopted on Date: 01/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 39 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEM ENT Objective 2.2: School Capital Facilities Planning. Shall cooperate with the School Board to ensure existing deficiencies and future needs are addressed consistent with adopted LOS standards for public schools. Policy 2.2.1: Reviewing the School Board's Annual Work Program.The City shall review the School Board's annual work program to verify that it is financially feasible and will maintain the LOS standards by the end of the five-year period. Policy 2.2.2: Future Development Proportionate Costs and Public Schools. The City shall coordinate with the School Board and adopt development conditions to ensure that future development pays a proportionate share of the costs of capital facility capacity needed to accommodate new development and to assist in maintaining the adopted LOS standards via impact fees and other legally available and appropriate methods. GOAL 3: Establish a redevelopment plan and research the possibility of creating a Community Redevelopment Area in the City. Objective 3.1: Redevelopment Plan and Community Redevelopment Area. Amend the Capital Improvements Element to include in the annual budget process funds to develop a redevelopment plan or conduct a feasibility study on creating a Community Redevelopment Area (CRA). Policy 3.1.1: Feasibility of Implementing a Redevelopment Plan. The City shall review the feasibility of implementing a Redevelopment Plan through funds established in the Capital Improvements Program. The Plan shall include at minimum, the establishment of architectural standards, community appearance standards, or both, for residential and non- residential properties within the redevelopment areas; and recommendations for the potential revision or amendment of provisions of the City's Land Development Code. Policy 3.1.2: Feasibility of Implementing a Community Redevelopment Area. The City shall review feasibility of implementing a CRA through funds established in the Capital Improvements Program. The CRA Plan shall include at minimum, recommendations for the creation of districts or zones within the boundaries of the City's CRA, the establishment of architectural standards, community appearance standards, or both, for residential and non-residential properties within the CRA; and recommendations for the potential revision or amendment of provisions of the City's Land Development Code. Adopted on Date: 04/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 40 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Policy 3.1.3: Creating a Redevelopment Advisory Board. The City shall create an advisory board to provide guidance on projects and plans established in the Redevelopment Plan or CRA Plan upon adoption of the plans established in Policies 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 of this Element. Policy 3.1.4: Seeking Innovative Financial Strategies. The City shall seek innovative financial strategies such as Tax Increment Financing (TIF) to fund redevelopment projects within the City. Policy 3.1.5: Establishing Incentives to Developers oflnfill and Redevelopment Projects. The City shall establish incentives, such as density bonuses, expedited permitting, reduction in impact fees, reducing or eliminating parking requirements, providing tax incentives, or creating an area-wide stormwater facility to minimize onsite detention and retention infrastructure, to developers of infill and redevelopment projects within the proposed areas established in Policies 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 of this Element. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE (5-YEAR) As shown in Table 11, the Five (5) Year Schedule of Improvements is the mechanism by which the City can effectively stage the timing, location, projected cost and revenue sources for the capital improvements derived from all the CP elements, in support of the Future Land Use Element. This 5- Year Schedule of Improvements has been used to document the "economic feasibility" of the City's CP, based upon the preceding sections of this Element entitled "Capital Improvements Inventory", "Financial Analysis", and"Goals, Objectives, and Policies". LONG TERM TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS Table 12 describes transportation improvements that the City anticipates may be necessary within a ten (10) year time frame. Adoptcd on Datc: 04/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 41 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN _ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Table 11: City of Edgewater Five Year Schedule of Improvements Fiscal Years Ending 20162013-2017 Project* Schedule Cost Revenue Source LOS Non- LOS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 2011 YMCA HVAC Upgrade $87,905 Capital Fund R PUBLIC SAFETY: (Firc/Rcscuc) 2011 Station 55 Replacement Carry Forward $807,979 Capital Fund R LEISURE SERVICES: Phase II .. 2013 $290,000 Capital Fund N Dog Park 2044 $50,000 Capital Fund N Mango Lakc Par-lk 2013 4-5403000 Capital Fund N 2013-2017 $364,939 Capital Fund N Hawks Park Improvements 2-044 $120,306 Hawks Park Restroom/Concession 2013 $110,000 Capital Fund R Rotary Park Redesign 2013 $20,000 Capital Fund N Hawks Park Walkway Lighting 2013 $20,000 Capital Fund N Sidewalk Infill 2013 $41,300 Capital Fund N US 1 Median Landscaping 2013 $100,000 Capital Fund N US 1 Median Irrigation 2013 $75,000 Capital Fund N Current Year Unreserved 2013-2017 $500 Capital Fund ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES: WWTP,building,printing,3urvcy,gcotcch 2013 $67,313 N 2015-2016 SRF& $14,000,000 N 2.5 MGD Wastewater Treatment Plant 2011 2015 Developer 2015 $5,000,000 SRF&Impact N SE Service Area Reclaimed Improvements 2011 Fees 2015-2016 Wells 21-24 and raw water mains 2011 2015 $4,600,000 Developer N Water&Scwcr R Replacement of 2"Water Lines 2013 2015 $150,000 Fund Water Linc Enhancement 2013 $53,420 N Reclaimed Water Storage Project 2013 $100,000 N 2013 $210,893 N Reclaim Water Improvements $100;000 Clariconc Painting 2012 $150,000 N Adopted on Date: 01/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 42 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Project* Schedule Cost Revenue Source LOS Non- LOS RTU Upgradca 2013 $30,000 R Sliplining Sewers. 2013 2015 $400,000 R 2013 $175,000 R Lift Station 1 Rehab $150,000 Reclaimed Watcr Linc Extenaiona 2013 $50,000 N Rcu3c Pump Station 2013 $3307000 N Sludge hand,emergency,powcr,lab 2013 $750,000 N $431,600 Contract Administration 2013 $375,725 N 10%projcct contingency bid 2013 $41-8,500 N Baricrec-.. a_d i.ca lvettr,_i 2013 $250,000 N Influent Pump Station 2943 $300,000 N Internal recycle pump atation 2013 $4-757000. N BTU Trainttl & tt2 2943 $500,000 N Chlorine,SO2 and Alum Fccd 2043 $330,000 N Clarificra,RAS&WAS pumping 2013 $435,000 N Third Clarifier Building 2013 $800,009 N Filtcra 2013 $30,000 N CL2 Contract 2014 $2857000 N Educational Component Eastern Shorca 2012 $25,750 N- 2015 $250,000 N Lamont St. and Riverside Dr. CIP Project 2944 2016 $250,000 N East Palm Way&Riverside Dr. CIP Project 2945 2017 E.Turgot Ave.&Riverside Dr. CIP Project 2016 $225,000 N 29th Strcct Pipc Croaaing 2012 $115,665 -- ..: - - ' : - 204-2 $25,000 2013 $30,000 R Polymer Station Replacements (3) $50;008 Roof Replacements at WTP 2013 $25,000 R Lime Slaker Replacements 2014 $300,000 R 2013-2014 $600.500 N Hart Ave.Design& Grant Application 2012 2013 $725,000 Lift Station Pump 2013 $25,000 N 2017 Unspecified Water 2016 $200,000 2017 Unspecified Sewer 2016 $200,000 2017 Unspecified Reclaimed 201-6 $50,000 Sidewalk Rcpaira 2013 $507000 R US 1 Water Linc Improvcmcnta 2012 $4,500 R Adopted on Date: 04/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 43 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEM ENT Project* Schedule Cost Revenue Source LOS Non- LOS Land Acquisition for new Public Worka 2013 $2667562 N Sitc (Rcfu3c) Land Acquisition for new Public Works 2017 $1,958,853 N Site (Sternweittef-} 2013 $50,000 MIEX Pretreatment Improvement at 2017 ARTWTP 204 $3,000,000 N WWTP Renewal and Replacement Project 2013 $6,347,283 WTP Lime Silo Painting 2013 $20,000 WTP Paint Chemical Feed Room 2013 $100,000 G2-03 Pearl St Pipe Crossing 2013 $175,000 R IRL 09 SW Improvements (Updated Master Plan) 2013 $200,000 Future Year Expenditure 2013-2017 $5,335,412 PUBLIC WORKS: 2013-2017 $2,202,694 Road Repaving 2012 2016 $2,150,000 Capital Fund R 2014 Signalize SR 442 @ I-95 SB Ramp 204 $287,546 Developer N 2011 30th Strcct Sidcwalk Carry Forward $573,428 Capital Fund NT Indian River Blvd. Extension (approx. 1 2014 mile) 2013 $4,604,160 Developer N US 1 Sidcwalk Survcy and Dcsign 2012 $1,500,000 N US 1 Sidewalk Construction 2014 $1,100,000 LAP Funds N Filer Avenue Sidewalk Construction 2015 $386,665 LAP Funds LEGEND:R-REPLACEMENT, N-NEW, E-EXPANDED *Projects in Fiscal Years 2012 2016 2013-2017 are currently unfunded. Table 12: Long Term (10 year)Transportation Improvements Williamson Blvd. Extension (four lanes) Indian River Blvd. Extension (four lanes) Signalize S.R. 442 at 1-95 southbound ramps Signalize S.R. 442 at I-95 northbound ramps S.R. 442 at I-95 lane additions Future Transit Corridor (Williamson Blvd. extension) U.S. 1 widening (six lanes between S.R. 442 and Riverside Dr.) Adopted on Date: 01/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 44 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN _ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT PROGRAM MONITORING AND EVALUATION The role of monitoring and evaluation is vital to the effectiveness of any planning program and particularly to the CIE. This is largely because the City's revenue and expenditure streams are subject to fluctuations in the market and the economy. It is the behavior of these streams which will be used to predict fiscal trends in order to maintain the City's adopted LOS standards for public facilities. Therefore, the CIE requires a continuous program for monitoring and evaluation,pursuant to Chapter 163, F.S., this Element will be reviewed on an annual basis to ensure that required fiscal resources are available to provide public facilities as necessary to support the adopted LOS standards. The annual review will be the responsibility of the local planning agency, and the City Finance Director and City Manager will serve as advisory members at all formal deliberations related to capital improvement monitoring and evaluation. The local planning agency's finding and recommendations will be presented to the City Council at a public meeting. The City Council will direct staff to take any actions deemed appropriate based on the findings and recommendations of the local planning agency. The review will include the following considerations, plus an examination of these considerations in order to determine their continued appropriateness: • Any corrections, updates, modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the element; or the date of construction of any facility enumerated in this Element, • The CIE's consistency with the CP Elements and its support of the FLUE, • The City's ability to provide public facilities and services within the utility service area in order to determine any need for boundary modification or adjustment; • The priority assignment of existing public facility deficiencies; • The City's progress in meeting those needs determined to be existing deficiencies; • The criteria used to evaluate capital improvement projects in order to ensure that projects are being ranked in their appropriate order of priority; • The City's effectiveness in maintaining its adopted LOS standards; • The City's effectiveness in reviewing the impacts of plans and programs of State agencies and water management districts that provide public facilities within the City's jurisdiction; • The effectiveness of impact fees for assessing new development a pro rata share of the improvement costs which they generate; • The impacts of special districts and any regional facility and service provision upon the City's ability to maintain its adopted LOS standards; • The ratio of outstanding indebtedness to the property tax base; Adopted on Datc: 01/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 45 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT • Efforts made to secure grants and/or private funds, whenever available to finance the provision of capital improvements; • The transfer of any unexpected account balances; • The criteria used to evaluate proposed plan amendments and request for new development or redevelopment;and • Capital improvements needed for the latter part of the planning period, for inclusion in the 5-Year Schedule of Improvements. In addition to the annual Capital Improvements Element review mentioned above, each request for a development order will be reviewed by a Technical Review Committee, as designated by the City Manager, and other appropriate personnel for the purpose of establishing whether the various adopted LOS standards will be adversely impacted if development is allowed to proceed. No development order will be issued if it is determined that the public facilities needed to maintain the adopted LOS standards will not be available concurrently with the impact of the development. Further, issuance of development orders will be delayed until the correction of existing system deficiencies which are required to increase the LOS provided to the adopted standard are complete. Adoptcd on Datc: 04/02/2012 Ordinance No. 2012 0 02 46 1° As City of 1LW Inc. CITY OF EDGEWATER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SUB-ELEMENT CHAPTER IX CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT CHAPTER IX CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT A. PUBLIC FACILITIES, CAPACITIES AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE (LOS) INVENTORY FOR CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT The following inventories shall be maintained by the City to be used for the concurrency assessment of new development. 1. Transportation: • Design capacity of different roadway types. • The existing LOS measured by the p.m. peak hour directional trips. • The status of service degradation of those roads classified as backlogged based on the methodology described in the Transportation Element of this CP. • The adopted LOS standards for all roadway types. • The existing capacities or deficiencies of the roadway network. • The improvements to be made to the roadway network in the current fiscal year by the City, Volusia County, the Florida Department of Transportation, or other public agency and the impact of such improvements on the existing capacities or deficiencies. 2. Sanitary Sewer: • The capacity of the wastewater treatment facilities. • The existing LOS standards measured by the average number of gallons per day/per unit based on the average flow experienced at the treatment plant and the total number of equivalent residential units within the service area. • The adopted LOS standards for average daily flow per equivalent residential unit. • The existing deficiencies of the system. • The reserve capacities. Adopted on Datc: 04/02/2012 OrdinanceNo.2012 0 02 CM-2 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX CQMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS LC_ li T CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT 3. Potable Water: • The design capacity of potable water treatment facilities. • The existing LOS measured by the average number of gallons per day per unit based on the average flows experienced and the total number of equivalent residential units within the service area. • The existing potable water storage capabilities of the water system. • The adopted LOS standards for the potable water facility components. • The existing capacities or deficiencies of the system. • The reserved capacities. 4. Solid Waste Disposal: • The design capacity of solid waste disposal facilities. • The existing LOS. • The adopted LOS standard for solid waste. • The projected capacities or deficiencies. 5. Stormwater Drainage: • The existing LOS measured by storm event as determined by the City and its Consulting Engineers. • The adopted LOS standard for stormwater drainage quantity and quality. 6. Recreation and Open Space: • The existing acreage of parkland and the existing number of recreation facilities as outlined in the Recreation and Open Space Element of this CP. • The existing LOS measured by the number of acres of parks available per 1,000 residents of the City based on an inventory of parks in the City and the population of the City. Adoptcd on Date: 04/02/2012 OrdinanccNo.2012 0 02 CM-3 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT • The existing LOS guidelines for recreation facilities measured by the adopted standard based on an inventory of the facilities in the City and the population of the City. • The adopted LOS standards for park acreage and guidelines for individual recreation facilities as outlined in the Recreation and Open Space Element of this CP. • The projected capacities or deficiencies. 7. Public Schools: • The existing LOS standard for public schools measured by the Volusia County School Board. • The projected student enrollment, capital improvements, and estimated revenues measured by the Volusia County School Board. B. CONCURRENCY ASSESSMENT The Development Services Department is responsible for determining concurrency for all applications for development, redevelopment and subdivision plats. When reviewing applications for such developments, the Department performs a Concurrency Assessment to ensure that public facilities are or will be available concurrent with the impacts of the proposed development. The assessment includes a basis for the establishment of existing conditions and the capacity of existing public facilities to service new development. The Department shall identify: • The ability of existing facilities to accommodate the proposed development at the adopted LOS standards; • Any existing facility deficiencies that will need to be corrected prior to the completion of the proposed development; • The facility(s) improvements or additions that will be needed to accommodate the impacts of the proposed development at the adopted level(s)of service created by the proposed development; • The date such facility(s) improvements or additions will need to be completed to be concurrent with the impacts on such facility(s) created by the proposed development; and • A recommendation or approval or denial with any applicable conditions or the timing and location of needed improvements. Adoptcd on Datc: 04/02/2012 OrdinanccNo.2012 0 02 CM-4 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAP LTALIMPRQVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT Prior to the issuance of a development order for a proposed new development, the City Council and/or the Development Services Department determines: • The impacts created by the proposed development; • Whether the public facilities covered under the Concurrency Management System will be available concurrent with the impacts of new development at the adopted LOS; • Those facility(s) improvements or additions that are required to ensure the findings of concurrency;and • The entity responsible for the design and installation of all required facility(s) improvements or additions. 1. Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Stormwater and Potable Water Facilities a) A development order is issued subject to the condition that at the time of the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, or its functional equivalent, the necessary facilities and services are in place and available to service the new development;or b) At the time the development order is issued, the necessary facilities are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement. pursuant to Section 163.3220,F.S.;or c) An agreement or development order,issued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S., to be in place and available to serve the new development at the time of the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. (Section 163.3180 F.S.) d) For potable water, prior to approval of a building permit or its functional equivalent, the City shall determine that there will be adequate water supplies and facilities available no later than the date at which the City anticipates issuing a Certificate of Occupancy to serve the new development. 2. Parks and Recreation Facilities a) At the time the development order is issued, the necessary facilities are in place, or actual construction has commenced;or b) A development order is issued subject to the condition that at the time of the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the acreage for the necessary facilities to serve the new development is dedicated, or acquired by the City, or funds in the amount of the developer's fair share are committed;or c) A development order is issued subject to the conditions that the necessary facilities needed to serve the new development are scheduled to be in place, Adopted on Date: 0'1/02/2012 OrdinanccNo.2012 0 02 CM-5 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT or under actual construction, not more than one (1) year after the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, as provided in the City's Capital Improvement Element,or d) At the time the development order is issued, the necessary facilities are the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the necessary facilities and services to serve the new development to be in place or under actual construction no more than one (1) year after issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy;or e) At the time the development order is issued, the necessary facilities are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement pursuant to Section 163.3220, F.S. or under actual construction not more than one (1) year after issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 3. Transportation Facilities a) At the time a development order is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under construction;or b) A development order is issued subject to the conditions that the necessary facilities and services needed to serve the new development are scheduled to be in place or under actual construction not more than three (3) years after the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or its functional equivalent, as provided in the adopted City's Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. The Schedule of Capital Improvements may include transportation projects included in the first three (3) years of the most current adopted Florida Department of Transportation Five Year Work Program. The Capital Improvement Element must include the following policies: i. The estimated date of actual project construction commencement and the estimated completion date; ii. A provision that a plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer or delay construction of any local road facility which is needed to maintain the adopted LOS standard and which is listed in the first three (3) years of the Five Year Schedule of Improvements in the Capital Improvements Element. c) At the time a development order is issued, the necessary facilities are the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the necessary facilities to serve the new development to be in place or under actual construction no more than three (3) years after the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy;or Adoptcd on Datc: 04/02/2012 OrdinanccNo.2012 0 02 CM-6 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN _ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT d) At the time a development order is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement pursuant to Section 163.3220, F.S.; or an agreement or development order is issued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S.; and will be in place or under actual construction not more than three (3) years after issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The adopted LOS standards (see Table CM-I) are the minimum acceptable standards with which all proposed new development shall comply. The Concurrency Management portion of this Element does not preclude the Planning and Zoning Board or the City Council from imposing other conditions of approval, including improvements and additions to the facilities covered under this system beyond the minimum necessary to achieve concurrency. 4. School Facilities For school facilities, the following standards will satisfy the concurrency requirement: a) For district-wide concurrency service areas: 1. At the time the residential development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under construction; or 2. A residential development order or permit is issued subject to the conditions that the necessary facilities and services needed to serve the new development are scheduled to be in place or under construction not more than 3 years after permit issuance as provided in the adopted public school facilities program. b) For less than district-wide concurrency service areas: If public school concurrency is applied on less than a district-wide basis in the form of concurrency service areas, a residential development order or permit shall be issued only if the needed capacity for the particular service area is available in one or more contiguous service areas and school capacity is available district- wide as defined in Section 163.3180 F.S. C. GENERAL RULES FOR CONCURRENCY ASSESSMENT 1. Existing Deficiencies No development may be approved which will impact a facility which is currently deficient unless the facility is required to be improved in the current fiscal year pursuant to a previous development order or permit. Any needed improvements shall be completed prior to the projected impacts of the proposed development. Adoptcd on Date: 01/02/2012 OrdinanccNo.2012 0 02 CM-7 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX CQMPREHENSIVEPI_AN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT 2. Approved Impacts The impacts of new development shall be assessed against the existing conditions and the projected impacts from approved but un-built development. These two items together shall be considered the existing conditions for all public facilities for the impact assessment of all proposed development. 3. Phasing Development that is proposed to be phased may also phase the improvement of facilities provided the concurrency requirements for each facility are met. 4. Time Specific Approval All development approvals shall have a time period specified in the development order or permit in which development must commence. The time period may involve two or more phases but the timing of each phase shall be specified in the development order or permit. Any required improvements shall also require a time period for construction and completion. Should development or facilities improvements fail to begin or be completed in accordance with the development order or permit, all outstanding approvals of the development shall expire. Amendments to time schedules shall be permitted but must be approved by the body granting the original approval. 5. Additional Information The Development Services Department may require additional information from applicant or other City Departments in order for an accurate assessment to be conducted. Such additional information requests shall be reasonable and be provided in writing to the applicant or appropriate Department. Should the Development Services Department require a special study (such as traffic counts on a road that is not regularly monitored), the applicant shall provide such information. Review and approval of proposed development may be postponed for a reasonable time period in order that more information may be gathered on a facility. Proposed development may be denied approval, for failure of the applicant to provide adequate information on the projected impacts created by the development. 6. Transportation The City's Land Development Code provides development thresholds at which traffic studies will be required. Required studies shall use the most recent Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Manual to calculate the number of trips generated by the proposed development. The Adopted on Date: 04/02/2012 OrdinanccNo.2012 0 02 CM-8 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN _CAPITAL IMPROVEME ISELEMENT_ CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT study shall then show the distribution of the projected trips, determine existing condition and project the LOS of impacted roads. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all facility improvements necessary to accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving a Certificate of Occupancy shall be in place. Completed improvements may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit if deemed necessary for public safety purposes. 7. Sanitary Sewer The City's Land Development Code provides sanitary sewer use standards for residential and non-residential development based on equivalent residential units. The City may require commercial and industrial developments to provide a description and estimate of water use needs for any commercial or industrial processes which create wastewater that will be discharged into the City's system. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all facility improvements necessary to accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving a Certificate of Occupancy shall be in place,as required by the Development Order. 8. Potable Water The City's Land Development Code provides potable water use standards for residential and non-residential development based on equivalent residential units. The City may require commercial and industrial developments to provide a description and estimate of water use needs for any commercial or industrial processes involving potable water. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all facility improvements necessary to accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving a Certificate of Occupancy shall be in place,as required by the Development Order. Prior to approval of a building permit or its functional equivalent, the City shall determine that there will be adequate water supplies and facilities available no later than the date at which the City anticipates issuing a certificate of occupancy to serve the new development. All development is subject to the City's Concurrency Management System. 9. Solid Waste The City's Land Development Code provides solid waste standards for control and operation for residential, commercial and industrial developments. Developments which are potential hazardous waste generators will be responsible for coordinating with Volusia County for disposal of such waste. Adoptcd on Date: 04/02/2012 OrdinanccNo.2012 0 02 CM-9 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPROVEMENTSI.EMENT_ CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all facility improvements necessary to accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving a Certificate of Occupancy shall be in place. 10. Stormwater Drainage All developments shall prepare a drainage plan based on the Stormwater regulations which incorporate the LOS design storm. Such plans shall be approved by the City's Engineer prior to the approval of the development. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, all facility improvements necessary to accommodate the impacts of that portion of the development receiving the building permit shall be approved and all improvements shall be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 11. Recreation The City's Land Development Code requires recreation impact fees for residential construction and/or land conveyance for new subdivisions. Commercial and industrial developments shall not be assessed as having an impact on recreational facilities. However, the City reserves the right to require the provision of recreational facilities as part of Planned Unit Developments. Adoptcd on Datc: 01/02/2012 OrdinanccNo.2012 0 02 CM-10 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT D. GOALS, OBJECTIVES,AND POLICIES GOAL 1: The City shall undertake necessary action to economically and efficiently provide needed public facilities and services to all residents within its jurisdiction in a manner which protects investments in existing facilities, maximizes the use of existing facilities and promotes orderly compact urban growth. Objective 1.1: Capital Improvements Provision. Will be provided to correct existing deficiencies, to accommodate anticipated future growth and to replace outdated and obsolete facilities, as indicated in the Schedule of Improvements of this Element. Policy 1.1.1: Criteria for Capital Improvement Projects. The City shall include all projects identified in the other Elements of this CP determined to be of relatively large scale in cost ($25,000 or greater) as Capital Improvement Projects and are included within the Schedule of Improvements portion of this Element. Policy 1.1.2: Debt Service and Operating Expenditures. The City shall, for accounting purposes, also include into this Element Debt Service and Operating expenditures. Policy 1.1.3: Prioritizing, Scheduling, and Funding Capital Improvements. The City shall, as a matter of priority, schedule and fund all capital improvement projects in the City's annual Capital Improvement Program which are designed to correct existing deficiencies as listed in the various other Elements of this CP. Policy 1.1.4: Renewal and Replacement of Capital Facilities. The City will continue its current program of providing for renewal and replacement of capital facilities as outlined in the various Elements of this CP. Policy 1.1.5: Capital Improvements Coordinating Committee. A Capital Improvements Coordinating Committee shall be created composed of the Technical Review Committee members as designated by the City Manager to evaluate and rank, on an annual basis,in order of priority, the projects proposed to be included in the Schedule of Improvements. Policy 1.1.6: Evaluation and ranking of Capital Improvement Projects. Proposed City Capital Improvement Projects shall be evaluated and ranked in order of priority according to the following criteria: • Whether the project is needed to protect the public health and safety, to fulfill the City's legal commitment to provide facilities Adoptcd on Datc: 04/02/2012 OrdinanceNo.2012 0 02 CM-11 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT and services, or to preserve or achieve full use of those facilities already in place; • Whether the project increases efficiency of use of existing facilities, prevents or reduces future improvement costs, provides services to develop areas lacking full service or promotes in-fill development; • Whether the project represents a logical extension of facilities and services within the designated Utility Service Area Boundary, and is coordinated with the plans of County and/or State agencies that provide facilities within the City; • Whether the p p 1 roject implements the policies of this CP as they pertain to the concurrency requirements; and • Whether the project is financially feasible. Objective 1.2: Proportionate Cost of Future Development. Ensure future development will bear a proportionate cost of facility improvements necessitated by the development in order to maintain the adopted LOS standards. Policy 1.2.1: Collecting Impact Fees. The City will continue to collect impact fees from development projects to pay for the provision of transportation, water, sewer and recreation facilities required by those projects. Policy 1.2.2: Considering Other Impact Fees. The City shall continue the use of other impact fees, such as for public safety services. Policy 1.2.3: New Development and Donating Fair Share of Rights-of-ways. All new development shall be required to donate or reserve their fair share of right-of-way adjacent to major roadways prior to the issuance of a final development order. Objective 1.3: Managing Financial Resources. Will manage its financial resources to ensure the provision of needed capital improvements for previously issued development orders and for future development and redevelopment. This objective shall be achieved through the implementation of the following policies: Policy 1.3.1: Maximum Ratio of Outstanding Indebtedness. In providing capital improvements, the City shall limit the maximum ratio of outstanding indebtedness to no greater than .75% of the property tax base. Adopted on Datc: 04/02/2012 OrdinanccNo.2012 0 02 CM-12 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COM PREHENSI_VE_PLAN__ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENISELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT Policy 1.3.2: Annually Adopting the Capital Improvement Program. The City shall continue to adopt a Capital Improvement Program and an operating budget on a yearly basis as part of this budgeting process. Policy 1.3.3: Financing the Provision of Capital Improvements. The City shall continue to apply for and secure grants or private funds whenever available to finance the provision of capital improvements and other City improvement projects. Policy 1.3.4: Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy. The City will provide for all public facilities needed to service development for which Development Orders were previously issued prior to the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy. Policy 1.3.5: Allocating the Costs of New Public Facilities. The City shall allocate the costs of new public facilities on the basis of the benefits received by the existing and future residents. GOAL 2: Maintain a Concurrency Management System to ensure public facilities and services to support development are available concurrent with the impact of development. Objective 2.1: Concurrency Management System. Will continue to utilize a Concurrency Management System so that decisions regarding the issuance of development orders and permits will be based upon coordination of the development requirements included in this CP, the Land Development Regulations, and the availability of necessary facilities to support such development. Policy 2.1.1: LOS Standards and Reviewing the Impacts of Developments. The City shall use the LOS standards (found in Table CM-I) in reviewing the impacts of new development and/or redevelopment upon public facilities and services. Adopted on Datc: 01/02/2012 OrdinanccNo.2012 0 02 CM-13 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSWEPLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMEN CLEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT Table CM-I: Level of Service Standards Facility Standard Sanitary Sewer 204 gallons/ERU/day Solid Waste 2.51bs/capita/day Potable Water 204 gallons/ERU/day Water quality: Meet State and Federal Drinking Water Standards Stormwater 25 year/24 hr storm Traffic Circulation Limited Access Roads B, or as otherwise prescribed by FDOT Arterial D Collectors D Guideline for Recreational LOS/Person Facilities Parkland 5 acres/1,000 persons Baseball/Softball 1 Field/4,000 persons Basketball Court 1 court/5,000 persons Tennis Court 1 court/3,500 persons Handball/Racquetball Court 1 court/4,000 persons Community Center 1 facility/30,000 persons Multi-Purpose/Soccer 1 field/4,000 persons Shuffle Board Court 1 court/1,500 persons Bocci Ball Court 1 court/10,000 persons Volley Ball Court 1 court/5,000 persons Boat Ramps 1 ramp/4,700 persons Bike/Pedestrian Trail 1 mile/4,000 persons Fitness Trails 1 mile/14,000 persons Activities Center 1/15,000 persons Gymnasium N/A Public Schools Elementary Schools 115% of permanent FISH capacity for the concurrency service area. K- 8 Schools 115% of permanent FISH capacity for the concurrency service area. Middle Schools 115% of permanent FISH capacity for the concurrency service area High Schools 120% of permanent FISH capacity for the concurrency service area Special Purpose Schools 100% of permanent FISH capacity. Adoptcd on Date: 01/02/2012 OrdinanccNo.2012 0 02 CM-14 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT ERU-Equivalent Residential Units FISH—Florida Inventory of School House Policy 2.1.2: Ensuring Adequate Water Supplies and Facilities and Concurrency. Prior to approval of a building permit or its functional equivalent, the City shall determine that there will be adequate water supplies and facilities available no later than the date at which the City anticipates issuing a certificate of occupancy to serve the new development. All development is subject to the City's Concurrency Management system. Policy 2.1.3: Tracking Water Demands and Outstanding Commitments. The City shall track current water demand and outstanding commitments in order to determine the availability of an adequate water supply for proposed developments. Policy 2.1.4: Concurrency Requirements. Provisions in the CP that ensure public facilities and service standards will be met to satisfy the Concurrency requirements are listed below: • The necessary facilities and services are in place at the time a development permit is issued; or • A development permit is issued subject to the condition that the necessary facilities and services will be in place when the impacts of the development occur;or • The necessary facilities are under construction at the time a permit is issued;or • The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement. The agreement must guarantee that the necessary facilities and services will be in place when the impacts of the development occur; or • At the time the development permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed contract which provides for the commencement of the actual construction of the required facilities or the provision of services within one (1) year of the issuance of the applicable development permit. Adopted on Date: 04/02/2012 OrdinanccNo.2012 0 02 CM-15 CITY OF EDGEWATER CHAPTER IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT • The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement which required the commencement of the actual construction of the facilities or the provision of services within one (1) year of the issuance of the applicable development permit. Policy 2.1.5: Evaluation Guidelines for New Development or Redevelopment. Proposed CP amendments and requests for new development or redevelopment shall be evaluated according to the following guidelines as to whether the proposed action would: • be consistent with the Utilities Element and the Coastal Management Element and not contribute to a condition of public hazard. • be consistent with the Transportation Element, Utilities Element and Recreation and Open Space Element and not intensify any existing public facility capacity deficits not envisioned within this CP. • generate public facility demands that may be accomplished by planned capacity increases. • conform to future land uses as shown on the FLUM of the FLUE. • accommodate public facility demands based upon LOS standards by provision of facilities by the developer or by the City consistent with this Element. • be consistent with the County, State and Regional agencies and water management district's facilities plans. Adoptcd on Date: 01/02/2012 OrdinanceNo.2012 0 02 CM-16 • • ■ CITY OF F1 ) GFWATER, FL 0111.„:„„,, ,, ,,,,ai, .- , .. ...,..... . , .. ,.-9,._ .. ''.4 '..„,,i , ":1-' t - .8'' vittiii --: 1 { syI' � .c: City of ... I-CI) Inc. 1951 ERI _..... 4,4„...,,,„„m CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2012-2013 TO 2016-2017 17Y2011 2012 TO 2015- 2016 . : The Capital Improvement Program as set forth in this document is a long range planning tool for the City of Edgewater. The document reflects five years of capital outlay with the first year officially adopted as part of the fiscal year -2012 2012-2013 budget by the City Council.The remaining years in the CIP serve as a planning guide,which is reviewed annually. The Capital Improvement Program (CIP)provides a planned and programmed approach to utilizing the City's financial resources in the most responsive and efficient manner to meet its service and facility needs. The CIP serves as a"blueprint"for the future of the community. Development of the CIP requires integration of financial,engineering and planning functions. The CIP also incorporates needs identified in the Capital Improvements Element(CIE).The CIE focuses on anticipated infrastructure requirements for six facility types: Parks&Recreation, Solid Waste, Stormwater,Transportation,Water and Wastewater. The CIE focuses on service level standards and the land use plan adopted by the City Council in order to preclude deficiencies in adopted level of services. The CIP is developed to achieve the following results: * Consolidating and coordinating all department requests with the goal of reducing unnecessary delays and coordinating individual departments'improvement programs. * Establishing a system of procedures and priorities by which each proposal can be evaluated in terms of public need,the comprehensive planning of the area and the interrelationships of projects and cost requirements. * Scheduling capital projects over an extended period so the most efficient financial plan for the CIP can be achieved. Table 1 City of Edgewater Capital Improvement Schedule Fiscal Years Ending 2013-2017 Project* _ Fiscal Year 2010-2044 2011 2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total Garry ward FINANCE DEPARTMENT: — c TIT AC'r a $87,905 $87,905 $87,905 _ _ $877 FIRE DEPARTMENT: Station 55 Replacement $807,979 $807,979 Fire-Dept.Totals $807,979 _ $807,979 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES: W\X'IP building printing, c,urvcy,geotech $67,393 $67,3'13 WA TIT Renewal and Replacement Project $6,347.283_ _ 56.347.283 WIT'Lime Silo Painting — S20.000 520.000 WI•P Paint Chemical Feed Room _ _ 5100,000 _ _ 5100.000 2.5 MGD Wastewater $6,500,090 Treatment Plant _ _ $7,500;000 $7.500.000 56.500.000 $14,000,000 SE Service Area Reclaimed Improvements $3000;000 55.000.000 $5,000,000 Wells 21-24 and raw water mains _ $2,3007000 $2,300,000 S2.300.000 $4,600,000 29'"_eet- ipe C easing _ $115,665 _ _ $115,665 Stormwater Master Plan 25;000 $25,000 Replacement of 2"\X'ater Lines $50;000 $50,000 $50;000 $1-50;000 Water Line Enhancement $53,420 $5-3;=1-20 Project - $1007000 $100;000 Reclaim Water 54-0000 Improvements 5210.893 5210.893 Glib.__ n,:._.:._g $450;888 _ $158000 R.T4,, umtftdes $30,000 $$30;000 Sliplining Scwcra _ $4803000 $4.00000 X100;800 _ $300;000 $137,934 $4-50;000 Lift Station 1 Rehab $12,066 5175.000 $175.000 n I' _ $25;080 _ J $26;000 Table 1 City of Edgewater Capital Improvement Schedule Fiscal Years Ending 2013-2017 Project* Fiscal Year 2010-2044 2041.2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total Reclaimed Water Line E terrsiens $50,000 _ $5000 Reuse-Rump-Station $330,000 $330,000 Sludge hand,emergency power,lab $750,000 X0;000 Contract Administration $375,725 $375,725 $431.600 5431.600 . . . - - - - $44-8;500 $44-87-500 Barscrccn and hcadworks $250,080 $240,000 $3807800 $3087080 ei4 $1-73;000 BTU Train't 1&t,`2 $4007000 $500,080 Chlorine,S02 and Alum Feed $340,000 $3387000 Clarifiers,RAS&WAS wing S435,000 $435,000 ". . 5 .... - $800;098 58007000 Filters $34D;000 $38;000 CL2 Contract $285,000 $2857000 Polymer Station $550808 $ 090 Replacements(3) 530.000 530.000 Roof Replacements at WTP $25,000 $25,000 Lime Slaker Replacements > $300,000 $300,000 $' Eastern Shorca m750 7'Tr50 Unspecified Water $200,800 5200.000 $200,000 Unspecified Sewer $290,080 5200.000 $200,000 Unspecified Reclaimed $30,000 550.000 $50,000 Sidewalk Repairs $504080 $50;000 Public Work3 Site(Refuac) $266,562 $266,562 Land Acquisition for new Public Works Site 550 (Stormwatcr) $50;800 51.958.853 51.958.853 MIEX Pretreatment Improvement at ARTWIP $3,0007000 53.000.000 $3,000,000 Hart Ave.Design and Grant $6007000 $725;000 Application $ 23000 5400.500 $200.009 5600.500 Lamont Street&Riverside Drive CIP Project $258;900 5250 000 $250,000 East Palm Way&Riverside Drive CIP Project $ 0;008 5250.000 $250,000 East Turgot Avenue& Riverside Drive CIP Project $225,000 S225.000 $225,000 G2-03 Pearl St Pipe Crossing S175.000 _ _ 5175.000 IRL 09 SW Improvements (Updated Master Plan 5200,000 _ S200.000 Future Year Expenditure Jgures Are Cumulative) S958,853 51.208.853 $1.458853 51.708.853 55.335.412 Table 1 City of Edgewater Capital Improvement Schedule Fiscal Years Ending 2013-2017 Project* Fiscal Year 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total Environmental Services $4533451 $63-734484 13,300,000 $93200,000 $336753000 $35,562,965 Totals 9,074,129 $1,708,853 $16,508,853 $10,758,853 $5,633,853 $43684541 LEISURE SERVICES: Kennedy Park Renovation Phaac II $290,000 $290,000 $58;000 $50,000 Mango Lake Park $500,008 $560;080 $120,306 Hawks Park Improvements $120,306 574.939 574.000 573.000 S72.000 871.000 5364.939 Hawks Park Restroom/Concession S110.000 5110.000 Rotary Park Redesign 520.000 520.000 Hawks Park Walkway Lighting S20.000 520.000 Sidewalk Infill $41300 $41.300 US 1 Median Landscaping S100.000 8100.000 US 1 Median Irrigation S75.000 575.000 Current Year Unreserved 5100 5100 $100 _QQ 5100 Parks and Recreation $8403000 960,306 Totals $120,,306 $441,339 $74,100 $73,100 $72.100 $71,100 $731,739 PUBLIC WORKS: $500;000 Road Repaving $4-50;000 5202,694 5500.000 $500,000 5500.000 5500.000 $2202.694 Signalize SR442(a)I-95 $287,546 $287,546 $287,546 30th Street Sidcwilk $573,428 $573,128 US 1 Sidewalk Survey R Design X007880 $4754(400 Indian River Blvd.Extension (approx. 1 mile) $1,601,160 54.604.160 $4,604,160 US 1 Sidewalk Construction S1.100.000 51.100.000 Flagler Avenue Sidewalk Construction $386,665 S386.665 $53-3413706 $50990 $85-3413-706 Public Works Totals $ 3425 $1;650,000 $202,694 $6,491,706 $886,665 $500,000 $500,000 $8,581,065 Tea,.l-r'vcarG.af Ferwrafd-FY 20 $1 /_9 1 y"nAv»3rc 2 $1239663190 $160003000 $937043000 �00 $�-7 $2,223,787 59,718,162 $8,274,659 $17,468.618 $11,330,953 $6,204,953_ $52,997,345 *Projects in Fiscal Years 2013 2016 2014-2017 are currently unfunded. _ „_ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES FY40-44 FY11 12 FY12-13 FY13.14 FY14.15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FIVE YEARS Garry Forward General Fund Transfer from Gereral Fund $160,000 $438,994 $500 000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $2,438,994 560,000 $2,088,994 FR-DAP-Grant 67$0;000 $700;009 TransferfremGrant-Fund D. $573,428 $1,600,900 $4,600,000 Transfer from Grant Fund-C $87-906 $120,306 $74,939 $74,000 $73,000 $72,000 $71,000 $364.939 $420,306 Transfer from Recreation Fund $130,000 $130,000 Developer $4,88-1-786 $4,99-4,-706 Local-Gp1iewGas-Taxes $600;000 $600000 $62;879 $82;'970 TransferfremDebt-Service $72$7800 $726-000 Unfunded/Future Year Reve,ue $5,991,706 $386,665 $6,378,371 Interest $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $500 General Fund Totals $644,033 $6,565,806 $959,765 $572,100 $571,100 $9,312,804 $1,770,306 $6;234406 $600;000 $6007000 $6007000 $9;602;042 Water and Sewer Fund Transfer from Operating Revenues $350,000 $300,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450.000 $2,000.000 $4627066 $713,697 $46041100 6150;800 $1,026,763 Transfer from Water Development Fees $75,000 $75,000 Transfer from Sewer Development Fees $75,000 $75,000 Debt Proceeds $6,347,283 $6,347,283 $5,104,226 56,104,228 Prior Year Carry Forward $492,493 $14,350,000 $8,350,000 $3,000,000 $26,192,493 Unfunded $$144007000 $87000,000 $07900000 $261600000 Water and Sewer Fund Totals $7,339,776 $300,000 $14,800,000 $8,800,000 $3,450,000 $34,689,776 $4621066 16017,922 $16;250;000 $48,560;000 $3;4607000 933 +29;988 Stormwater Fund $6007000 $280000 5226;000 $1,616,416 Transfer from Operating Revenues 6201-416 $595,500 $200,000 $250,000 $250,000 $225,000 $1,520,500 Prior Year Carry Forward $180,000 $180,000 Stormwater Fund Totals $775,500 $200,000 $250,000 $250.000 $225,000 $1,700,500 $291446 $600000 $260;000 $226;090 $1;646,446 Public Works Complex Fund 6266,662 S266,602 Transfer Refuse $202,927 $200 000 $200,000 $200,000 $200.000 $1,002,927 $60:800 Transfer Stormwater $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $250.000 Prior Year Carry Forward $705,926 $958,853 $1,208,853 $1 458,853 $1,708,853 $6,041,338 $346;662 $316;662 Public Works Complex Funds Totals $958,853 $1,208,853 $1,458,853 $1,708,853 $1,958,853 $7,294,265 Total Carry-Forward-p 404 $1464312 Total Revenues from All Sources $9,718,162 $8,274,659 $17,468,618 $11.339,9$3 $6,204,953 $52,997,345 $2,22-3,7437 $127066490 $46;000;000 $9;780;000 $4476;000 $46,864,977 SUMMARY OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Facility Type FY 10 11 FY 11 12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16.17 Total CaFFy Forward Finance Department $879 5 $977906 Fire Department $807797-9 $-80747-9 Environmental Services $9,074,129 $1,708,853 $16,508.853 $10,758,853 $5,633,853 $43,684,541 $463431 $6434;484 $15500400 $97209;000 $3,67-5,000 $357662-965 Leisure Services $441,339 $74,100 $73,100 $72,100 $71,100 $731,739 $120;306 $840;000 $860306 Public Works $202,694 $6,491,706 $886,665 $500,000 $500,000 $8,581,065 $573428 $4450,000 $6491-706 $5007009 $500,000 $600;000 $84417746 Total-Garry Forward FY 2011 $1469,312 $1469,31-2 Total Capital Improvements Funded $9,718,162 $9,718,162 $2;22-3487 $2,2237787 Total Capital Improvements Unfunded $8,274,659 $17,468,618 $11,330,953 $6,204,953 $43,279,183 $12;966490 $16-,000,000 $9-700;000 $4;17-L000 $42;844490 Total Capital Improvements $9,718,162 $8,274,659 $17,468,618 $11,330,953 $6,204,953 $52,997,345 $2,223,787 $1-2;966490 $46,000,009 $9,7007000 $4476,-000 $46064,877 • SUMMARY OF COMMITTED AND PLANNED FUNDS Fund FY 11 12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY14-15 FY15.16 FY16-17 Total General Fund $644,033 $6,565,806 $959,765 $572,100 $571,100 $9,312,804 $1,169,312 $1,770,306 $6723406 $600;009 $500;000 $500;900 $0,211,466 Water and Sewer Fund $7,339,776 $300,000 $14,800,000 $8,800,000 $3,450,000 $34,689,776 $162;066 $6-817:922 $1-5;250;000 $8;060T000 63459;009 $32;629,888 Stormwater Fund $775,500 $200,000 $250,000 $250,000 $225,000 $1 700,500 $291,115 $6007000 $250,000 $259,000 $225090 $1,616,415 Public WorKs Complex Fund $958,853 $1,208,853 $1,458,853 $1,708,853 $1,958.853 $7.294,265 $31-67662 $3467662 Total-GaFFy-Forward-FY-2041 $1;469412 $4,469,34-2 Total Committed and Planned Funds $9,718,162 58,274,659 $17,468,618 $11,330,953 $6,204,953 $52,997,345 $27•23,787 $12;966;190 $46,004,000 $9,700,000 $44-75-000 $46,064,97-7 ' OM0h00 0) 000000009 .V0000 0000D 0U) M O O h 0 0 OOOMNM (00000r) 0ov1- U) 0 (D0 4. V' W O OD N N O O V O O u 7 h O CD N N (D M CO h M O r- N CD N V' O N 0 00 O co M M M C ,- co co 0 N .- co ()N '— co co i{. O N (D 0i O 0 `- V' F N h N ' 0 0 0 0 O O O O h h C (° u) 0u) v U N N 9 M 9 . Q j t. . O O O _ ¢. i,� ^ ' 0 0 N O N O O O ' N hC O O O O f O O N h�.. N h to r � O O r OWL N N 9 EH 9 ' 00 too(n o 0 0 mto 0 0 (D O c0 O O o OD OD C) o ' (D r- h o 0 o v or-- • M.o (D ai o ri (fl o mm U O 0 N N ' 0 0 0 O(.D O O 0 0 OD O OD O O O O OM O O O(D L9 O 9 s- v0 � u a 0 4 vvn:o tri CO h 0 0 o O h O CO O cD U) Cr) U) M to (D N U) O to 0 O v N 9 N N 9 9 M 9 (1) ' 0) Nr 0 0M N C- 00000000 M Moo OM w 000x) 00000 M M 0 0 0 e- O d (D O O O O CO O O !- 0 �.. '1"...1 W O 7 r. N O O V O O U) C' o x) C C' O 0 - NNN V,0v C' .... N4 V CO a N CO N 3 N a) m Z Z (n (» Z 9 (n Q -J .= d 111i m Jo E E N 0 1- U Z D o m co rn 2 w 01— O m .o o y Z = .S C o 11. < 0 C lL > U O c m o U • U C C u) i C 2 0 0 CM C m > C LL c) O m J a m 9 ` Oa FF arx m •°- `a 5 f6 E C E >' m C Z o oi re m m o rn a) (a t) O_ cu N wma� > o 'mg 8 ' N ga U Lwii o a0i N .- w c N a 0.m 0 `0 .o U N > Ca, C7X c Ce mf C' E > = J _ � C m CO tL Q o o LL n t -6 -6 -6 .c 0 m `m aci W fu c W v rn N a aaaa Y � } W mva>0 ti m } U N N C m Q 173 . �Y + � E a' N I,‹ N C — 022c -0 o (a o cu m en :� (n (A a x )(1J 0)1— cu N 0 U a) CO C C 41 2 On .b D LUW .,..... 0 ‘-- 0) YV Of E 00000_ 0_ 0 O 0 0 0 0 CD M R' c9 ,!- (2) ,--� w C Z (ON (+) MM (DOD (0 U) U) U) U) N D - O � N C d; CDmowo 0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 —• Z CO co co co N 0 co co co co o 0 o U U U U) U (C C U) tf to U ( U 0000 Ud CUnnnnn (0 (0U) IX) Q O 0 0 0 Q U) U) U) U) U) U) u) U) U) U) U) U) 0 0 0 0 U) U) U) U) U U U U U U U U N 0 0 0 0 u) o () (L) In n n o (A U ( o (p M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 0 0 0 M M (D C) 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D 2 000100, N 1000000) 0000000000 n 0 00ONV . N N (O 0 0 0 m O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N- U) 0U) U) N N 6) N (- 00 U)00 () 00000000 6) -- 0, O 1- n V 6) m j1 V M N MN 0F.- 00000041 O 10 N O M U) M v v'- .- M O O co N N O (O \� O N CON 01 06- .� ��...�.. N V N 7 "7 F- N M F" M M 1; �A Vf fH N O 0 O 0000 O N O 0 0 0000 0 N O O O ^ 0000 0 s, _ O O O 6666 O U) O U) 00410 U) V O V O NN 0 V C '? p M M O N N d N N .� . (1) ffl 1 O 0 0 0 0 O i O O 0 O co 0 0 O • U )U) 0 0 O 0 U) V M co U) U) M 1p p m m 0 (O N m N N M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ▪ U) U) 0 00 0 0 V V M 0 V U) O M m O V O v v N V N N H) (H 0 O O O O O O O O O O O V O O V M O M M O O M M O 0 N N 0 ta Y 0 0 0 M M CO , M 0 0 0 0 co 0 0 U) U 0 0 010 6) N. U 100000 6) 0 0 N- m m 000N V N- m m Nm000/0O O N O Tr 0 U) U)N N Cr; 'O^ t'- O O U)O O U) O) Z • N U) N- N V 6) M (y V C') N V N O N- M o. <- M m ..4.. M a (n vN�� M LL N U) (. 3' N (O N W Z (» Z (n a -, O 1- m wa O 2 -1 --1W < LL F c O a E N W f- a0 ow as Ua m Q E F- m m m U Z L.L. C.L.C 2E! m2 W a W m a c d p m C7 F °) m E U E w E c o. c E. w < Q ? `moo Z 1) oLo m E E S E m OU -. c 3 m m d co cm) m�. > d m c 1) m Et W > m a) ai p 8- m w O LL .S m F 6 m .6 n _ w IX m 0 m 3 wE U > o5 ce a) o) `m (ij c o a3 aUi Ui J m co 3 0 co o6 a co co o c1 3 (` '6 co .@ d > Q 03 m '' U 3 0_ to.-U _CO o aQi m 1`112 c m aa) co E w E E E c) m j 1) 1) u) y 0, r 0, ccoo Q 0, (n m (n v U Z w o o U al N N E T° 0, E Y , U N . . 1`'0,) ? c Ce w 5 . N U v . i w _ 6 '40 ° ° E ' -:_ ( 1 1E (c c c h a U q u a y X n ` N m W 0, _ O a a v O 1- 1- 1- o (1-. - TS a JNw › D = D2 N C N CO V O) 0) 1) c `c m .` a v 0 0 V M OO N m 0, E O O O 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O D CC C V V' v o W c Z sf V d of Vv Vv R 7 V' C V V V' V V V 0 CD 0 0 0 r.' (O CO CO (O (O CO (O (O (O (O (O (O (O (O (O (O o C v• O• = C U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co 3 Ne000c000 O m mmmmmmmmmmmmmoom m U M M M M M 0 O U) U) U U) U U) U U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U a U 00 000 U Et U U) U) U) U) U) U U U) U U U) U) U) U U) U < 0 0 0 O a a U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) O O O O O U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) Ili 00000 101010 (C) U) U) U) (010 011010 101 y K V V V V V V' V V Q V' V V V nr ? V V V V co V V °V V V V V V V V V V V v V �V v v v V V CD \ \ \ \ kk\ m 2 $k\ � k/\}G %\ 5,2 o � NaNN % ` \) k �� UI - 640 e _ � � § , 0 CD 0 C7 3 \ § ) N y- o C.4 .,•' m _ ® m \ r \ \ , \CO CO / ? °2 0 § \ \ ' © N N fil CA E,3 8 \ Ii ao al, 01 N 2 0 0 < LL / o 0 - abel o22 _ _ \ \ uin 0 _ / 0 < ® 000 3 000 0 LO i< 2 < /4 §Gp \& \\\ / - o 0_ , m - N CL - fse ! cY a° < » § &/ z w e z _ u,\ \ ° Xre - < 2 mow § co > b ) Cl) k E / a) z 2 a co 6 _ f 2 7\aff 2 ° � ` ° - ` Jk } { \ } } ) \§ e 60 6 6 \ i 20 & ) I { ( fS £ \ /\ \ } / § » (j \ @ &< § Eo k { \ A § 70 ,00 \ 5220 ) CO . / co OD CV k/o Cl) e00000 o re § « 6 ® gz ' \ \ i \ \ § M 9 � ® ' g9RR » 9 o :II = \ , 2 0000 § n O ∎ I E / « \ » G2g ) 00 < $ § § § $ § k Co G $ G « 22 ] \ \ \ \ § \ \ § f-000 (1) MN (n 2 N 0 CO (0 10 (0 d Q)O M ' N 00 et N ) O La 4 a) Cl) (1) M 00)) (N 0 ONO N 1r M N (0 N. .- LC) 1"-- @ F F ! ZS ,; W N CV F,,,q N -..mmio p � _ O O M M M M .0 O 0(1) (C) (1) (1) r O O N O N. 00 co C as _ O(A O a T f�') p •- �- TO § .1. �/ „ow,- N ... ■. A ,�. EA EA EA I O O M M O O(n (t; CO (MA tD O O W CO as ' p a0 O O O N Ou)U) O 0 r, f` r...° 0 T `"' 0 N N .. (L9 EA (A(A (A O 0 M M 0 0 u) (1) CO CO (0 0 0)10 0) to ' 00 00 T O G O C O V O u)0 V Q ( fO) V V O p N N (A (A fA(A 69 0 0 CO CO CO 01 0 0 u) (n u) (1) O O CO 0) �, ' 00 CO T N (0(0 0 M 0 0 M N N T Co p N N (A C) fA(A !A N.. n O(O CO Ch M M U N 0 N (1) 0 U) (1) 0 M O)O O) C) M ' co m Z .0 T N O (1) M N T O a0 p N O(n O 0) N 0) (1) Q. T N N. 0) d T O) 6 ❑ F C a) cm y N CC Z I? Z (A M Z 03 EA (A • W LL 1 •Q 10 U H a.. x Q M 0 a WI 0 < o O H U W <U. ` d u.• 3 z co d Z s . > 0. > tn:0 •o S m LL d N 3 co d E Q C 0 w n C Lij c2 fn '-' 0 m n E E m m Y W w (°n 2 o U 0 v oy r c Eai ' U-no < o � < C C Q F 0 F F tea` a )i N o N W N CO> � 00 C N C L N as C o a o ,3 E V W 1"-- 00 E !A (n E oo E a O• worn 0 3 cZ O 0 U M O C a) m C g 0 a m M 00 N U 0M = • O O Q O O u () CV U) V H Q. Q 000 C Q Q' (1) K) j U O O O (1) to 0 0 0 O) u) u? O) m 0 0 0 LL 0 0 LL N cA to O I 11 (n @ V <t 'V • 'a ? • 2