Loading...
03-12-2014 - Workshop CITY COUNCIL OF EDGEWATER WORKSHOP March 12, 2014 6:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Present City Council Mayor Michael Thomas Councilwoman Christine Power Councilman Mike Ignasiak Councilman Gene Emter City Manager Tracey Barlow City Clerk Bonnie Wenzel Planning & Zoning Board Agnes Witter Joseph Roy Robert McIntosh Jean Kayat Pat Card Darren Lear Economic Development Board Chip Selman Marcia Barnett Steve Harrell Oscar Zeller Jennifer Butera Absent City Council Councilwoman Gigi Bennington Planning & Zoning Board George Kennedy Edwin Vopelak Economic Development Board Jeff Berner Bliss Jamison Donna Snow William Wetherell 1 Council Workshop March 12, 2014 2 . MEETING PURPOSE The purpose of the workshop was to discuss refinement of the Finding and Necessity and Community Redevelopment Plan. City Manager Barlow presented an overview of what would be discussed at the Workshop. Ginger Corless, Tindale Oliver, presented an overview of the Finding of Necessity. Evan Johnson, Tindale Oliver, continued the Finding of Necessity Overview. Ms . Corless asked if anyone had any questions about their findings since the Council would be asked to do a Resolution reaffirming their findings . Agnes Witter asked Ms. Corless if they had a person to person conversation with tenants or property owners of the properties that were really run down. Mr. Johnson informed her they had not. Ms . Corless informed her the finding was a visual inspection. Pat Card noticed that "following these rates per square foot of office commercial/industrial space" was considered and was one of the seven at the time. He asked if that had been eliminated, which Mr. Johnson informed him it had. Councilman Emter asked what a normal number of deficiencies was in the kinds of programs they have investigated out of the 14 blighted factors. Ms . Corless informed him she had some that had only two and she had some that had met almost all 14 . The average number was around six. The ones they had found were typical of an aging strip corridor. She spoke of there being other communities being similar with the type of findings they have. Mr. Johnson spoke of working St. Pete Beach, which had 6 blight factors and Gainesville had 6 or 7 . He identified part of it had to do with data availability and making sure it was accurate as well as much of it having to do with the aging corridor. Mr. Card asked what the primary reason was that they extended to Falcon Avenue. City Manager Barlow informed him that was a City Council request. Janet Shira stated there were a lot of properties south of SR 442 where people had been interested in purchasing or leasing but when they find out all of the deficiencies they are no longer interested so it made sense to include them. Ms . Corless provided an overview of the Community Redevelopment Plan. 2 Council Workshop March 12, 2014 Councilwoman Power asked how this would affect the plan if the County said they would not write one for 40 years but would go for 25 . Ms. Corless spoke of asking for what was in the State Statute as a starting point and that the County probably wouldn't go for that. They put in there to reset it at different times, such as reevaluating at 20 years with the possibility of sun setting early. That was something they would discuss when they got into the negotiation. Councilwoman Power questioned if they get to the end of the time and it wasn't where they wanted to be if they had to write a new plan and start over again. Ms. Corless stated a plan was a plan based on State Statute. The County was part of the approval process every time they update, which they were going to require. Councilman Ignasiak asked if they had been in any situation where counties had set caveats if they hadn't met a certain goal or benchmark within the same time period and would withdraw their support. Ms . Corless stated she had seen where benchmarks were made from the standpoint of projects or revenue coming in and they could actually change based on the amount of increment coming in to decrease their contribution, which was part of the negotiation process. Part of that was the review process, which she felt would be put into the CRA. She further commented on it being very critical that they following the plan when they set up their CRA. Oscar Zeller asked if traditionally increments were better than the projection. Ms. Corless informed him the increment was usually better. City Manager Barlow pointed out when they look at all three scenarios they didn't see a strong separation of expense until they were at the 20-year mark. Ms. Corless identified that cities such as Daytona and New Smyrna that have redevelopment areas have had them for a very long time. Councilwoman Power asked if they let them borrow before the money came in. Ms. Corless commented on there being a couple different programs and that every city was different. She further spoke of the bonding world changing. Mr. Zeller asked if the bonding was with the County' s permission. Ms. Corless informed him it was based on their own fiscal policy they have whether to bond or not or with the County it could be part of the negotiation process. Councilman Emter asked Ms. Corless in the projects they have dealt with what she would suggest would be a minimum pot before they could go and bond. She informed him she didn't have that answer but she could get that answer from her public finance. She identified some cities, such as Ocoee, had actually done loan programs to their community redevelopment areas to start with administrative and 3 Council Workshop March 12, 2014 programming costs that they paid back once the increments started coming in. Ms . Corless recommended that the Council sit as the Community Redevelopment Agency. City Manager Barlow asked Ms. Corless to be a little more descriptive of how the board could be made up, which she did at this time. Councilwoman Power commented on the CRA board having a County representative on it and if it was only if it was an advisory board. Ms . Corless informed her at this point she would say advisory board. She recommended the City Council stay as the CRA. City Manager Barlow stated when they started this process he was given direction by Council at the time for a seven panel CRA board, which consisted of five City Councilmembers and two appointed by Council that either resided or did business within the CRA district. On top of that they could have an advisory board, which would fall under the Sunshine Law, to advise the CRA board. He recommended an advisory board be considered at a later date, unless they heard from the County Council that they were suggesting it and wanted to have a representative on that board. He recommended they focus on a seven- person CRA board, consisting of five councilmembers and two appointed. Ms . Corless pointed out that usually with a seven-member board they don't have an advisory board. Mr. Johnson pointed out they only have one CRA agency board. If they have multiple areas, often times communities will have an advisory board for each area. City Manager Barlow felt Edgewater had an advantage because of it having a relatively small community redevelopment area with a lot of similarities . Councilwoman Power pointed out that New Smyrna was going after the same kind of thing. Mr. Johnson identified one of the differences between the draft and the next version was that it was now broken down by planning areas and was more specific. Ms . Corless spoke of breaking up the planning area and being able to look at smaller projects that may allow them to get other funds and grants that are smaller in cost and magnitude so it wasn't so overwhelming. Ms . Corless commented on Comprehensive Plan Consistency and then identified the Next Steps. Ms . Corless informed Council that Orange City was going to be making a request to Volusia County on April 3rd and that they really wanted to listen and learn based on what happened with Orange City. 4 Council Workshop March 12, 2014 City Manager Barlow stated April 3rd they would see the first city that would go across the dais of the current Council under the new resolution for them to consider. That was going to be a huge learning opportunity for them. He was hoping to have anything they needed to adjust in their plan, based on what they learn April 3rd, completed and on Council's desk at their May meeting to consider requesting that delegation. He encouraged Council to look at the capital projects between now and their May meeting and communicate that to him or Ms. Shira so they could make the final adjustments before they conceptually approved it at the May meeting. Councilwoman Power asked if he needed to know what they would be willing to give up in the negotiation phase. City Manager Barlow felt that was premature. He further spoke of there being so many unknowns . Councilwoman Power asked if Orange City or the County put it off. City Manager Barlow informed her the County. He further identified years ago when they went through this there was a partnership between the cities and County. Ms . Corless stated there has been some communication between Orange City and Volusia County. The County Council didn't want to address the creation of new CPA areas . City Manager Barlow pointed out recently there had been slim to no conversation so nobody had a feeling of how to approach this . Ms. Corless stated the dialog ended quickly. City Manager Barlow felt it would help for Council to make contact with the elected body at the County Council level and talk to them and address their concerns and make them comfortable with Edgewater' s plan. Ms . Shira felt it appeared it came down to an issue of funds. She felt they needed to be saying they weren't taking any of the existing property taxes they currently use to balance their budget. The only thing they were taking was an increment that only they would work hard to obtain. It wasn't taking from their unincorporated properties and was only from city properties. Councilwoman Power stated it would benefit the County in the end. Ms. Shira identified New Smyrna as a case in point and that their CRA sunset next year. The County after next year would get all of that increment back into their General Fund. Councilman Emter asked if they could get those numbers to reinforce the argument that the County would regenerate their funding at the conclusion of the CPA and by using New Smyrna Beach as a very positive example that should help with that argument. Ms . Corless informed him they had those numbers . City Manager Barlow identified it was Page 53 in the PowerPoint. 5 Council Workshop March 12, 2014 Councilman Emter mentioned Edgewater following shortly behind Orange City and New Smyrna moving full speed ahead. He felt it was a short period of time to develop any type of "rolling snowball" to try and influence the County to approve. He then pointed out there was no mention made of the upcoming CRA's on the VCOG agenda. Mayor Thomas informed him he could bring that up at that meeting. He had already had that dialog and they usually back each other up. City Manager Barlow stated back in 2010 when Volusia County started to redo the Resolution when it was going to affect everyone all of the cities came together. The County quickly figured out a strategy and divided the cities . He felt it was important to get VCOG and the support of other cities . Ms . Corless felt it was good to use VCOG because of their collective power and that it was a good recommendation to address them. Mayor Thomas felt they would all stick together. Ms . Shira felt the more they could stick to the facts and the money, which was the County's issue, the better off they were. City Manager Barlow spoke of the snowball effect as they start the redevelopment effort and New Smyrna being the poster example of the benefits of a CRA. Steve Harrell spoke of it taking a long period of time to develop a CRA and asked how they compress that into a current public campaign to get community support. Ms . Corless identified what other communities had done such as business forums and neighborhood forums, to educate the general public about the process . She also spoke of people not wanting their blighted properties improved because their property values would go up and they don't want their taxes going up. Councilman Ignasiak didn't think they would have a problem with the marketing or the Plan. He felt the cities were looking at long term local development and the County was looking at short term revenue streams. He felt it wasn't going to be about the Plan, the focus or where they intended to go and that it would come out that it was about revenue streams . He felt they weren't willing to give up funds they see and probably feel are rightfully theirs that the cities are trying to deny them. He hoped he was wrong. Ms . Shira stated the County had just under a $6 million operating budget. Of the 15 existing CRA's the County was giving them a total of $5 million, which was 10 of their budget. Mr. Harrell asked if the historical growth rate could be a negative factor against this . Ms. Corless identified they were conservative numbers and they would probably realize more towards the middle scenarios. She always used the most conservative numbers of what may be estimated. Mr. Harrell didn't disagree, if they focus on the historical growth rate it could be a negative incentive to some. Ms . Corless felt they 6 Council Workshop March 12, 2014 had to start somewhere and identified it was their base line. Ms. Shira identified it would continue to decline so everybody would continue to see less and less . Mr. Harrell felt that could be something that could be built into the Plan. City Manager Barlow pointed out they were trying to stop that decline. Ms. Shira felt maybe they needed to have some numbers that show if they didn't do anything. Councilwoman Power questioned there being CRA' s that have a negative increment. Ms. Corless spoke of the CRA's that were established during the boom time, between 2002 and 2005, that set their baseline high and then the market crashed. She informed Council this was a good time. Mayor Thomas felt that 980 of the public did not understand what a CRA was and that most of the public was afraid of something they didn't understand. He also spoke of negative publicity, which has a negative effect on a CRA. He felt it was going to be an uphill fight. Mr. Zeller identified that a CRA helps the community reinvest in itself. Ms . Shira suggested getting the business community to help them convince the County Council that Edgewater had a good CRA plan. Mayor Thomas agreed. Mayor Thomas asked how many properties they were talking about. Mr. Johnson informed him 509 parcels. Ms . Shira felt it was the influential business owners and property owners that they needed to target. Mr. Zeller asked where downtown Edgewater was. Ms . Corless identified she had always looked at the intersection of Ridgewood and Park because it had different architecture. In the Vision Plan the corridor on East Park was to become the downtown village area but they had to create it. She felt this was a very workable area. Mayor Thomas thanked Ms. Corless and Mr. Johnson for their presentation. Ms . Witter asked about dividing low and moderate income housing. She asked if that was part of the CRA. Ms . Corless felt that needed to be looked at and pointed out the housing here was pretty affordable already. The question was how do they keep affordable housing as they improve the area. Ms . Witter felt it seemed like it was saying they had to incorporate affordable housing into improvements to the corridor and she didn't want to see a mixed use zoning with cheap rental apartments on top of businesses. She further spoke of Delray Beach being a great example of how they have done the integration of affordable housing into market rate housing. 7 Council Workshop March 12, 2014 Ms . Shira stated they were taking out some of the subsidizing and low interest loans as it was being taken out of the final version. City Manager Barlow commented on an informational brochure that staff had put together as it related to tax abatement that was going to be handed out at the Business Expo that was being held March 14 - 16th. The City had a booth. He stated it would be helpful if any members of the Economic Development Board, Planning & Zoning Board or Council would help with staffing the City booth and distributing the brochures. 3. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to discuss, the Workshop adjourned at 8 : 04 p.m. Minutes submitted by: Lisa Bloomer, CMC 8 Council Workshop March 12, 2014 4/23/2014 City of Edgewater Finding of Necessity and Community Redevelopment Plan Updates March 12,2014 Presentation Purpose • Conduct a brief overview of the Community Redevelopment Act, Volusia County Ordinance and 6 o—.wn Delegation of Authority • Present updates and refinements W� of the Finding of Necessity (FON) and the Community Redevelopment Plan (Plan) — s • Solicit comments and revisions ,. ,� • Review next steps to request delegation of authority from Volusia County aim 1 4/23/2014 What is Community Redevelopment? • Under Florida law (Chapter 163, Part III), local governments are able to designate areas as Community Redevelopment Areas when certain blight conditions exist • Community redevelopment is an economic development strategy to eliminate and prevent conditions of blight in the community • In a home rule charter county such as Volusia, the City needs to seek delegation of authority f °' to pursue community redevelopment activities OV s What is Increment Revenue? • Method of financing redevelopment projects which allows the property taxes produced from the incremental value of the improved property to be reinvested back into the area • Helps local governments attract private development and new businesses, and retains existing businesses that might otherwise find more attractive options r elsewhere r� • The jobs and additional investment(private and public) mean more money for the City and community as a whole • Permits municipalities to pursue redevelopment activities without raising local property taxes, it is NOT a new tax • The revenues generated stay in the defined redevelopment area—What is paid here stays here 2 4/23/2014 Background • November 2008—Vision Plan was completed to develop a framework for future development Q • May 2010— City completed the Economic v151014$ ~ III Development Strategic(CEDS)Plan and designated the initial Community Redevelopment Area boundary as a Brownfield • October 2010/January 2011 —City initiated and updated the FON to identify blight conditions and the proposed Community Redevelopment Area • April 2011 -City adopted Resolution No. 2011-R- 08 stating that: City Council makes a legislative finding of fact that the conditions in the Community Redevelopment Area meet the criteria described in Sec. 163.340(7)or(8), FS wpm Background • June 2011 -City adopted Design Standards for the Ridgewood Ave. (US-1)corridor • October 2011-Regional economic summitto POMMUNIry PL N identify common economic development E q objectives and to engage community/ REDEVELOPMENT °'•^• •°e<,,.,,, business leaders about priorities for the future • July 2012—City initiated the Preliminary Plan and drafted a resolution to request for delegation of authority from Volusia County to establish a CRA • August/November 2012—County responded twice for additional information _ • May 2013—City hired Tindale-Oliver& A Y, Associates(TOA)to update and finalize the FON and the Plan 3 4/23/2014 LEroposegJJI&elopment Area A� • Approximately 400 acres consisting of 509 parcels, which is 2.8 percent of the total City's area of 14,411 acres • Generally contained within the boundaries created by the Edgewater City Limits on the north; Florida East Coast Railway on - G the west; Falcon Ave. on the south; and Riverside Dr. along Park Ave. on the east. • The majority of the boundary is within a couple of parcels east and west of Ridgewood Ave. (US-1) Proposed Redevelopment Area ^a Paa ipene 8 Pea cn.rtgP..w � &4 aQ 4 4/23/2014 • • • %06 ns • Ninth lowest median household income ($39,007.00) as compare to any other city in Volusia County a (Source:Volusia County,2012) • Fifth lowest average home value ($116,484.00) as compare to any other city in Volusia County (Source:Volusia County,2012) • Unemployment (10/2013)- 6.5% (Source:2013 Bureau of Economic and Business Research) -^R Community Chapter 163, Part 3, Florida Statutes • Finding of Necessity —6 of the 14 blighted area conditions factors have been identified[Sec. 163.335(1)and 163.340(8), and 163.355, F.S.] • CharterCounty-Volusia County has adopted a home rule charter and it is necessary for the City to obtain a delegation of the redevelopment powers from Volusia County to establish the Community Redevelopment Agency(CRA), adopt the Plan and establish the Redevelopment Trust Fund, and carry out the implementation of the Plan, or amended or modified Plan[Sec. 163. 410, 163.356, 163.357, 163.358, 163.360, 163.361 and 163.370, 163.380 and 163.387, F.S.] • Community Redevelopment Plan —addresses the blighted area conditions observed in the FON, creates a vision for a sustainable community,and demonstrates how the Plan is consistent and complementary with the City's Comprehensive Plan[Sec. 163.360 and 163.362, F.S.] 5 4/23/2014 Volusia • Ordinance No. 2010-20 • Furthers Volusia County's Smart Growth idEErW Initiatives for a clean, healthy environment; strong, livable communities; and a strong economy • County participation in the improvements within the Community Redevelopment Area benefits the overall east Volusia area, such as: ➢ Improving the environment and protect water resources along the Indian River/Mosquito Lagoon ➢ Reversing the declining urban form along `- Ridgewood Ave. (US-1); and ➢ Strengthening the commercial viability and —_$- overall community livability rr Volusia • Ordinance No. 2010-20 • The County's increment revenues contribution would be based on a millage rate that does not exceed the millage rate used by the City • The Plan is intended to serve as a framework for development and redevelopment over the next 40 years until end of 2053, however, the City suggests completing a sunset review with the County in year 20(2033)to determine the success in reversing the blight conditions • No Volusia County increment revenues will be used for non-capital programs • County contributions for specific project(s)are identified in the Capital Work Plan • CRA may elect to update and amend the Plan every five years contingent on County review and approval • Available incentives for specific goals are identified in the primary objectives and strategies 6 4/23/2014 Delegation 0=1ority • City seeks the County's partnership and encourages the County to have involvement with the CRA on a regular basis • Establish appropriate interlocal agreements with County and other agencies on major r capital projects to allocate funding and resources for the redevelopment efforts • City suggests completing a sunset review with the County in year 20(2033)to determine the success in reversing the blight conditions • If it is jointly determined that the CRA has Opp accomplished the primary objectives outlined in the Plan,then the date for the sunset for the Community Redevelopment Area can be re-established for a period of no more than 40 years Finding of • Blighted area determination- must have substantial number of deteriorated or deteriorating structures and at least 2 of 14 different blight factors • Substantial deterioration exists within the proposed Community Redevelopment Area: - Congested and unsafe roadways Lack of pedestrian facilities Decrease building values Faulty lot layout Outdated building patterns Poor building and site conditions Inadequate infrastructure (potable water, sanitary sewer, stormwater systems) _ • 6 of the 14 blighted area conditions factors have been identified - 7 4/23/2014 Blight • • Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout, parking facilities, roadways, bridges,or public transportation facilities[Section 163.340(8)a, Florida Statutes] r Current LOS C along Ridgewood Ave. (US-1)causing restricted maneuvering through lanes and potential traffic delays behind major incidents r 2006 and 2013,there were 419 accidents, of which 287(68%)accidents occurred within the Community Redevelopment Area and 132(32%)accidents occurred within the rest of the City r Multiple driveway connections along Ridgewood Ave. (US-1)and W. Park Ave. do not meet current driveway separation or intersection separation criteria r Lack of viable, comprehensive system of accessible sidewalks, bicycle facilities and dedicated multi-modal facilities r Uncontrolled access points, lack of parking, poor signage, poor or nonexistent drainage, faulty street lay-out, no curb and gutter r Overhead utilities hamper streetscaping efforts and create inadequate roadways by preventing sidewalk widening and tree planting Blight Factor — Defective Transportation Multiple driveways,defective access management,unsafe roads Inadequate pedestrian and bicycle system No curb and gutter,poor or non-existent drainage �i� 4/23/2014 EM e • Aggregate assessed values of real property in the area for ad valorem tax purposes have failed to show any appreciable increase over the 5 years prior to the finding of such conditions[Section 163.340(8)b, Florida Statutes] r According to the Volusia County Property Appraiser's data, land values are exceeding building(improvement)values throughout much of the Community Redevelopment Area r Based on the City's building permit records,there is little substantial private investments over$50,000 in the past 6 years r The total building value within the Community Redevelopment Area is $40,878,970,and the total land value is$36,330,507,which means that only $4,548,463 separates the land from the building values-as land values increase and the buildings values decrease further decay may occur Blight Lack of private investment i �� :• I�fi��rlT FOR RENT 578 0/98 0,406.7898 9 4/23/2014 Blight • • Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility,or usefulness [Section 163.340(8)c, Florida Statutes] r Many of the properties have irregular dimensions that create lot sizes and shapes that make compliance with current building,zoning, parking, stormwater and other land development regulations difficult r Majority of blocks reflect a high proportion of owners,with few adjoining parcels or aggregated parcels under single ownership making it difficult to consolidate property for redevelopment purposes r Based on the Volusia County Property Appraiser data,there are 178 commercial parcels located on Ridgewood Ave. (US-1). Of those, 118 are less than 1 acre, 41 are between 1 and 2 acres, and 18 are less than 12 acres making it difficult to meet contemporary regulatory requirements Factor —Blight • Layout Small parcels making them difficultto comply with current development regulations r� x a � 1 ^.,# '� �c�h� fit" r'k' • • r s.. • s � g �F xE 10 4/23/2014 Blight • • Unsanitary or unsafe conditions[Section 163.340(8)d, Florida Statutes] High traffic accidents along Ridgewood Ave. (US-1), multiple driveway connections, inadequate parking facilities,and lack of viable, comprehensive system of accessible sidewalks and bicycle facilities Substantial numbers of buildings are substandard,with many reaching a state of dilapidation and clear underutilization- 140 documented conditions,41 were considered deteriorated and 72 were considered dilapidated Increase in property deterioration, lack of maintenance, nuisances and other physical decay between 2009 and 2011 with a decrease in code violations in 2012 due to loss of a code enforcement officer, and once City reinforced their code enforcement staff in 2013,the number of cited violations increased again ➢ Poor siting, placement and deterioration of refuse dumpsters Poor stormwater drainage, inadequate potable water and sanitary sewer lines Existing overhead utilities create unsafe conditions due to potential fire hazards and roadway obstructions Factor Blight of • • • Poor access management and parking Dirt roads two Inadequate pedestrian system W. Deteriorated structures Poor siting and lack of dumpster enclosure 11 4/23/2014 • CD of Site or Other Improvements[Section 163.340(8)e, Florida Statutes] Improper or poor maintenance of yards and improvements,structural deterioration,or unrepaired storm damage Right-of-way acquisitions and impacts from Ridgewood Ave. (US-1)widening have rendered some of the properties functionally obsolete Out of 140 documented conditions 41 were considered deteriorated and 72 were considered dilapidated Increase code enforcement violations in property deterioration, lack of maintenance, nuisances and other physical decay r Public park improvements and programming are necessary to prevent deterioration that contributes to physical and visual blight due to lack of public use Blig�Wctor — Other Unkempt yards Deteriorating driveways and parking Poor stormwater system Outdated building pattern Ell Deteriorating building and site conditions NEW- P_. S -® P�b-- 12 4/23/2014 Blight • • Inadequate or Outdated Building Patterns[Section 163.340(8)f, Florida Statutes] Most of the residentially used lands have been zoned for other uses Lack of parking and stormwater,small buildable areas, insufficient land to expand, incompatible adjacent uses and problematic access due to archaic rights-of-ways,canal systems and dirt roads Lack of a substantial commercial investment along the Ridgewood Ave. (US-1) corridor-few substantial private investments over$50,000 in the past 6 years Many of the residential structures appear to be substandard and reflect conditions inconsistent with current zoning, devoid of sidewalks and good drainage, and have code violations ➢ Faulty lot sizes, shapes, location,and problematic title situations offer little value to a community Blight • OutdatedBuilding Pattern Outdated building pattern and lack of private investment qEEEJJJJJJJJPrTW If r FOR RENT 13 4/23/2014 • 11 11 1 • V • Regional economic summit was held with Volusia County, Edgewater and New Smyrna Beach in October 2011 to identify common development objectives, and to engage community and business leadership in an active dialogue about priorities for the future • During the Spring of 2013, the 5th Annual Edgewater Expo was held with over 150 vendors lining Riverside Dr.to identify important economic development objectives and provide the framework for multiple redevelopment activities CII101 E DNS MAT FG.e RedevelopmeAML A* on • Vision statement developed during the Envision Edgewater process in 2008: The City of Edgewater will be a safe, clean, accessible and environmentally- friendly community with a small-town atmosphere. Edgewater will continue to be a waterfront-oriented community that provides a sustainable, high quality of life, with a strong sense of pride in our civic amenities, our community facilities, our vibrant and distinctive neighborhoods, and our thriving downtown. • Vibrant quaint urban Downtown with a mixed use"main street" along Park Ave. • George R. Kennedy Memorial Park as a focal point for the Downtown • Safe, viable and sustainable commercial corridors along Ridgewood Ave. (US-1) and Park Ave. • Affordable and attractive neighborhoods ; • Safe transportation network, pedestrian ` connections and public space/recreation facilities 14 4/23/2014 •,&elopment Goals. • Framework for guiding development and redevelopment over the next 40 years • Addresses financing and implementation strategies and management and administration opportunities • Mitigation or correction of infrastructure and utilities s` deficiencies, revitalization of the Ridgewood Ave. (US-1)corridor,various transportation and urban design improvements,and pedestrian safety issues documented in the FON • Furthers Volusia County's Smart Growth Initiatives for a clean, healthy environment;strong, livable - - communities;and a strong economy Conceptual Diagra • Sets the Planning Vision • Elements shown may be relocated or realigned, so as long as modifications are consistent with the planning vision b a Iii a aeY�iode x 15 4/23/2014 Diagram Conceptual OComPleted Elmrts O BeautBlcahon y �J Rq Ow"A.e..s.eunm.oeeys idAq nt,sflnt'Ir Dnere mee.shm _ -J ReAU awns ghorp.vamc 9nrs,slP�r9e1 �uSt saswaaoeayn Dro)ad �qn Arenue Rresesen wn ngrawmrma. _ _ �v°`� . IeNUape:gnade8drs®n wmwdsi ®nld3ewmtl attnue lmnmartanb 1� @i -'g.-" "` ®AC,.IIMmeaema1O,WmA NOT ®GareweY;ceepnerpns&Wbc nNluai �) `L '.. improwmemaaen3 eomeu7' w*,u,AAIP�a ©Large scale Imraat.dans © Development P ajecm `Cr ®�yeDDe Esn.rmmmslrl,n lnewrct ®oewrmrnedame si asmrehgnem mnawr 1 conlw orny,mac ane mpki az inMav:tiwrBD�kl alm mpmeamb, Plann ng Arm l:NOM L mM1b Lamon[Street / ioik tlmn xaha Prwergaenmhh�7 Plann ng Arm2L—t Sheetb OCean Avenue ®Ertlalree D.tlerhranCmsswaKQiwlutlirg PlannngArm20cean AVanuabMacon Avenue ��L i Rlakwmenuma<7' Z.n Armd:Marim Avenue SOUb L ., �E,hn�nrm of LrmttSbpe' LEGEND ®ErtlF4 CxMal Repoml RMITnilk Me � njee Dw tel� man arar lNNnrclm ovrei �nhree.o � %� canes D dj, berme lltlleea pndu*p lbdp—m ®Prvavelh YnPmaiaib "a Re°^em„emu.� � J —CM Smndnry ®Paa4nAlAS Po ee eaxMroal � I ll—pmem Holed r ©Parks aid Open Space ® n •••••••••...rwreoam Slbaewea b EcNweerrilmm P erariene �.,ri\s �^� nGp�g eaa R K, s Mmk Pk ••••••••..,Cubtl - xvars can Ramemnn nome� ....kilwabuahae lmDmmne� ,,�� jP ��i�y*�'�' t� �� to Conceptual Doehsl he�ana:ae Ir he earrmarat � +ms �ms� � P andsmrmcun,haaerlw.em�smbmrosDmd aecw, a�a ��, r �'{:, � >�.4k�s I�� ��` Diagram Planning A (North to Lamont lam O Complrted Ellarm 0 Bea nicahon a� 5 tae mahomASms.�m'm.oe94s ®neaerAm avew�e-am.e vnsrelpeeesr� 1J--�i A hAYdn0.aaMC llAlrta,alpi�ei � w`-( ®u6-,suawahnesion Dro)ad Pam Arenas Grass seubn napraremems. ``a�T nldAexmtlRrenw lmnmamaih bmscsPe sange8dmgn NeNatle) '' ®Aareen Mnnmeme C. mspm mor ®`"'a'16rfaem'na°naapuhe nnelaaaf � ' ingrovemems oleiq amtrkn• �wayMmA9lD�ape• l©large scale lmraatruature © pereldpmem Prgjeem ®�,eresee Esn.nrmwlrlm lnervrct ®pa.omwa Eaae.,aer Reeerehgmem rnaaeAr mdwae,nweian a�eeeat�i �oea a Dutius calm mDmew�k, ioik kr.m mom.prwergawmhhm7 ' ®EMal�ee DV�ticshinn CmsswaK{InGlWirg - '' Rlakwme numeai• � S'`" �\ EMmm�rm of LrmttSbpv' LEGEND \\\ ®Eftd Ene G Mal Reabml RMITnilb Me - ■ _ bean arrer fa.Wnrclm crawl ���e�Pam p{_.. ®ewmremnrts finnluhlnp pm�mona �e.e��o..y a.m..�u, Blight Factors - - - preimpePma�, ®arProve Vtilirca lrlduMARMAmram �°ain � a B ®Rrvawelh YnPmrenaib �v.,.,,."a rsnw.m..maaa .k 7®PManAI�Mo Ledatimlreal —CM 9—tE —oevaapmem�Oled eaumalea ©Parka and Open Space ............wb,re oamlawa ENemlm �ceorae Rlrmreq Mmmda Parc ......crcndam weedcwelmDmrar�ene 0 N.aa.gn R.nea,mnaa. brrroudvelmpmwmemn ®Nwinm Gelewy Dak p ...........Pzamnceaon lrryrmemaes ©Poehsl Fle¢V—fmhedelwmutlf ms s snsm� D� P i anhsmrmcan,haw .�m�om�i�mahsd mecca 16 4/23/2014 0 Cemplemd Elmrts 0 Bea "iution L AIaAe.maAams.crvnm.oesgs 0 iaAgn,flnt-'Ir Pesmloae.soai 1 ... ReANaaons Ilphdrp.valM1C 119r'rs,slPlage) p+.s �uSt deawaxgeayn arolnd an arenhe Rreseaeolbn lmprowmrma, ppl IeNUapesi(n aees®w-s[ x ®nle3erwtlxttnwlmnmrrten6 ®ACeessMenacembd Cpwdinefim la OT ®w*,u,PAIx 1pns&Wbic NNlara[ �� \\ „ improwmmtaaelp eomeu7' Q{wraTnaing 9lAlaAe- auc ©targ s I Im tmrdure © Beemlopmen[Projects 3 ®per. En. .I reed wewgx yay bpwrmep Eeeee,ker Reeeeam�k�mr wmw orlry.mac enesuoko- mw�ep,arwr alm mlepewl�la ,.. ��� _��� i'Nk xa� gawmhhcel ®Errcmsetl rv�tleshien CmsswaK[IISIWira Rlatwme AroJxni' EMm�nam of LemttSmpv' LEGEND ®Eftd Ent R*aI eamRail Tmittee m ea'w lluJrclm vas) �naee.o O.rmxmwrtspncluhllq Alaom ` �•,"""'""' a .. �Mnmra utrdea maemAlmAawem ��°^^ - - ®nNp.�elxrnPmrep�b ®ParanAlJtl po eeeealmlroa[ —CM 9—t —Gevaapmem Holed eoumarax J 0 Parlwandopenapace ®9eorpe R.Yalredx Mrnadk Pak ,,,,•.G."d EbeebcNelmgereneNS Blight Factors xvure Pary Rememnn rvme� ....•.......xllmabuNae lmpmmnellh &MEL ®Nwmem Gakary PJlr eF .........PzmNaceaon lrrymxemwes GV Poexsl hNSelazae(<he eelermretll ^Ilse gam�eralam ps P wmde Ir.CPA,hJ cry M1areimlicaWie mroePmJ Fe CPA Diagram Conceptual Planning Area 3(Ocean Avenue to Marion Avenue) f O Cemplemd Elterta 0 BamtNicahen �Fe mahoma ���onres ilAgoma venue-'Imm')amlosa.slaan f A Ilghdra.vaMCligrlre,slPlage) ®us,deawaxeepn areAs �pan arenw[creseaedlm llnprrxemerm. �nlaAemtl ArepPe Imnpwma�m bmsr+re:�asdae-a de:�AC.wra,m:l ®RCress Menecemmecpwdinalim lani ®Gam'xeYiceeonelpns&Wbm wclnae[ IlrorrwmbunleAtemlxn• Sly w,tmdaeoslgnapn• ©targescelelmrastruhne © Boeelopmemfmjeels ®�xere�eeE�he��l%�[de�,gk ®ep�m�pEa�,,,aerReeeeel�makPopawr �a e mdreau,naeian�esu�o- mw�oenapu,lip calm mlemmmra, I'N kwm wad.orepergawmhhcel ®EMan�ee rv�tleshien CmsswaK{IISIWira �e EMmwnem of LemkSmpp' LEGEND ®Eftd EastG-'Repoml RMITlailktee �n�Lnce^uar Neen serer faanrclm lxrrel Ana • � _ ®xrpmremmts flncluellp Alticemootl tau wnp..y n.m.mu _ � pwim�A�at� �� ®al'Pme Vtilllia lekCMAltieAex'ooE t�mm.rtu ®RrvavkxxnFmraraib �PManAlJtl po eeexelmlreal —eRn 9ommly Z —oevaapmem Holed eaumarea ©Parks and open apace r ............wb,re Gprpnmrp EJemlm George R.Yalredx MrnadN Parc ......Cgnpelee Sbeebceae lmpmreneNS Blight Factors ^ 0 N.�w.gre R.ne„mn ...... Nrrroudgelmpmremems ®Nwmem GaNay aax ©l:eaugamsaem�we sP�fic Pmi.e mmxamllmcunh Pzamnceaonlrryrpremaes Poexm Poenmazaz rr he eaarmpml J er eim�ommm�maheJ mecca 17 4/23/2014 Diagram Conceptual Planning Area 4(Marion Avenue South) O Cempmmd Elmrts 0 Bea oiution \ { FeA�ulanonsa s.ennm.oesgs 0 ab].—Aeeime-wme Dns�loeeesxal ItpAq vast,Ilfnt,slgm') us,egad—jr ®nla�e.waAntw lmmDmeAe meae � baAX"e atwn lmromwremea. /I J � ®ACnenalaaDaoemencDwiaaeaa lnor ®ramwariceaonalmnea Ddnr mnluea) -�� improwmmtaaelp ermep7• �{D*DaeIAAIgIaAn- ©taage scale Imaaatmmam © Development Projects `N ®�areDPe E.n.DP .l Dlm wexDPx yay oewrmaaeamPa<er Reeeeelmtmk pmt emlae.ry,roman anescapkp ieb�tion BDtklie calm mlaoemlolra, - 1 t ioik kmn xa�Prepergawmh,mll ®EJlal�el DV�ticshian CmsswaK Qtslmira Platwmd Auanwl• Emaz�am ettramnsmD.' LEGEND 1 ®Exhnd Esa C,*Il Re* Fail Tiltte � ,nmuaa tkana�arlmxJrelm,owx) Zanr�.,. J sradara �W I.mo..y...t..tW Mprmamwtkllnelualtp AlaIMVOOa �eyn u.eawu.oi pmiDape PmldJ' �InDmDa utlm)ntluMAFtlAaxnod ��°^,•�'• " Iy Prvavelh YnPmrmtaib .a vml.m..m.aa � 1 ®FYanAIJm Ro aeaa'atmlroal —CFA 9—t —oevaapmam nolan enumarax ©Parteaedopenapace ............rwreommdarva bamslaz ®G-a R—It Mmmdk Pak _. ...........,CmnDkhtl SbeebcNelmgerarteJe Blight Factors ...........thsebunhae lmDmmnetlh ®Nmkem Gakwry PJlr eF .........PzmNaceaon lnamxemen6 GV Poexsl hNSAYazaz Ir. he dmermmdl ^Ilse gam�e slam ps P I wade Wlla CPA,hJNryM1areimlicaWte afeuDbJ Fe CPA Redevelopment Objectives ♦ Strategies • Objectives have been identified as FOR RERi either "Primary" or "Community" Primary Objectives are deemed the gas most important in addressing, removing,or mitigating blighted area conditions Community Objectives are intended to pave the way for the redevelopment 1 18 4/23/2014 Objective Primary • Improve safety, access, and traffic flow for internal and regional connections and provide for pedestrian and bicycle facilities and overall beautification Strategies: • Provide ample access to and between ® T various land uses and future redevelopments D • Integrate traffic calming techniques • Conduct additional roadway infrastructure planning efforts/studies to improve the road network • Create gateways into the Community _ Redevelopment Area and Downtown • Coordinate with local utility companies to - place utilities underground,where feasible Primary Objective • Improve connectivity and comfort for pedestrian and bicyclists Strategies: • Complete connection to the Volusia County's Ra1ed8 ff East Central Regional Trail systems via Park Ave. to the Indian River o • Explore creative options for crossing majors streets , • Employ Pedestrian safety and CPTED design standards • Undertake roadway, sidewalk, landscaping, and lighting improvements • Develop regulatory/wayfinding signage and �? r street sign programs • Enhance area transit stops 19 4/23/2014 Objective Primary • Identify and promote a workable means to fund, finance, and deliver stormwater management facilities Strategies: • Conduct ongoing evaluation and maintenance of the stormwater management system W • Improve stormwater conveyance,treatment, and discharge • Provide shared stormwater management facilities .,—- • Coordinate stormwater and drainage improvements 4 with roadway construction • Accept"green infrastructure"for stormwater credits in site plans y Primary Objective • Identify and promote a workable means to fund, finance, and deliver utilities Strategies: ,. y M� • Develop strategic long-term plans to relocate power lines from the Ridgewood Ave. (US-1) corridor • Provide fiber optic and other digital infrastructure along Ridgewood Ave. (US-1) and Park Ave. • Construct potable water lines and facilities connecting to the existing water system, and extend central sanitary sewer service 20 4/23/2014 Primary • • Open Space • Provide and improve recreation facilities and public spaces by creating exciting,safe, inviting, and viable public open spaces Strategies: • Enhance George R. Kennedy Memorial Park as a focal point of the Downtown • Develop a new park at the Northern Gateway R • Improve Hawks Park Recreation Complex by developing coordinated activities and programs • Provide a multi-use trail/pathway to the Volusia County East Central Regional Trail systems via Park Ave. to the Indian River • Ensure existing and proposed parks, recreation facilities and bike paths/multi-use trails are well maintained,accessible, safe and inviting Primary Objective • Create attractive,safe, viable and sustainable commercial corridors and improve the quality of residential neighborhoods Strategies: • Create a Northern Gateway • Develop public design standards • Establish roadway beautification programs wm�_. #R . • Include a roadway and streetscape plan • Create regulatory measures to promote the redevelopment of a mixed-use Downtown • Establish compatible industries • Establish design review procedures and assign staff to oversee the integrity of the =- CRA's vision 21 4/23/2014 Primary • • InfiliDevelopment • Encourage infill and development opportunities to support commercial, industrial, non-residential and residential uses Strategies: • Identify catalyst sites •; • Develop existing City Hall site as a town center with a mixed use"main street' • Encourage acquisition and subsequent redevelopment and/or improvements by the private market • Incorporate housing revitalization to mitigate substandard and dilapidated housing Primary r� Objective • Preserve and repurpose historical assets Strategies: • Work with the historical museum to identify historic and archeological sites Church at SW corner of Ocean Ave. and Ridgewood Ave. (US-1). ➢ Leisure Services building at 1108 South Ridgewood Ave. ➢ Tropical Blossom Honey building ➢ Loveland Groves building ➢ Hardware store (former school) at SW corner of Ridgewood Ave. (US-1)and Park Ave. _ WEE • Create a targeted restoration grant program or a direct plan for purchasing and restoring specific buildings or properties — 22 4/23/2014 Primary • • 9: Funding • Establish a creative,equitable, efficient,and practical funding and financing mechanism to properly implement this Plan Strategies: • Identify and secure all effective sources of funding, including, but not necessarily , limited to, increment revenues, non-ad ` 1 valorem assessments, public-private partnerships,and grant funding revenue • Be willing to issue bonds, secure other financial instruments,seek grants, enter into public/private partnerships,and seek out other sources and alternatives to aid in implementing this Plan Community • • . . - • Encourage neighborhood and business stabilization, maintenance, and appearance through Code enforcement and maintenance program Strategies: • Dedicate resources to augment the City's staff in monitoring Code violations • Identify, execute, and coordinate special maintenance standards and programs for public facilities, roadways, open space areas, entries, Downtown, and commercial corridors � ;�• 23 4/23/2014 Community • • Support • Support and assist local businesses to succeed and attract new businesses Strategies: - • Create a logo, identity package and website ii m i • Establish promotional campaigns � • Support festivals,exhibits, performances and other special events NMI • Create a business recruitment package L jo • Support a fagade program • Establish public/private partnerships , • Provide assistance to encourage development proposals that support the redevelopment vision r IIIIIIIII ...Y - . • Develop a Transfer of Development Rights program Non-Residential Building Opportunities • Existing Mixed-Use Future Land Use 12 dwelling units/acre r 0.5 floor area ratio(FAR) • Consider higher residential and non- _ residential densities/intensities in the future for mixed-use to achieve the overall vision for the Downtown r 10 to 20 dwelling units/acre r Upto2.OFAR 17 4 24 4/23/2014 ResidX&tial BuILding Opportunities • Existing residential densities are expected to remain the same r Low density single family-4 dwelling units/ac r Medium density multi-family-8 dwelling units/ac r High density multi-family- 12 dwelling units/ac • Consider higher residential densities in the future to achieve the overall redevelopment vision r Low density single family—5 to 8 du/ac All r Medium density multi-family—10 to 12 du/ac r High density multi-family- 15 to 24 du/ac / Development • Future parcel assemblage of at least 2 acres for residential mixed-use developments to meet minimum residential densities • Residential dwelling units will be allowed in the same buildings as office, commercial/retail uses, or multi-use development sites • Multi-use development on the same parcel must be compatible with surrounding land uses • Mobile homes should be limited to existing mobile home parks and are prohibited within the Downtown • Industrial uses should be limited to areas specifically classified as Industrial on the FLUM and are prohibited within the Downtown • Building design, including height and location, is expected to reinforce a pedestrian-oriented character and scale 3 25 4/23/2014 • Plan shall expire on December 31, 2053 • 40-year duration is necessary to realize the dollars to undertake the initiatives - — �`- identified within the Plan under Increment Revenue Scenario 1 Jok (Historical Growth Rate) . • City suggests completing a sunset review with the County in year 20 (2033) i • If jointly determined that the CRA has �,•'f"� accomplished the primary objectives, then the date for the sunset can be re- established for a period no more than 40 years Increment Revenue Estimates • Three different scenarios were developed that reflect future growth rates for taxable values in the Community Redevelopment Area r Scenario 1 (Historical Growth Rates) Scenario 2 (City Growth Rates) Scenario 3 (Optimistic Growth Rates) • 2013 millage rate has been used, and it is held constant over the planning horizon • Projections will be re-examined periodically in the context of actual redevelopment/development activities and be used to update the capital work program and the Plan 26 4/23/2014 Scenarlak. Historic Growtli.RatesA��� V561A05.000 563.959,000 52,153,000 I 516,000 5140. 530.000 $69.321.000 $.,.23.1. $50,000 $65,000 595.000 $]1,95],000 $10,552.000 %5.0 $62D. $131,000 574925,000 $13,52..o0D 588,.0 $]... $16],.0 $.8,039,000 $16,636,000 $]08,.0 597,0. $x05000 $71,306,000 $19,901,0. $]39,.0 $-,.. $366x. $94]34,000 $23,329,.0 $ss2,.o $13]0. $289,000 597.132,000 $26,92].000 5215,100 Sss9,a. $333.000 $93.109,000 $30.]06.0. s 1200,.0 5191x. $]81.000 wbTamlrye9�oJ $1,128,6. $931... 53.961,0. $96,D.s,DOO 531,6.0.0.0 $225,.0 $2.A. $429,000 $-.- $226.. $480,000 2.6 510.,611,0. $43,3.,0. 650. S271,. $214- 5535x. 51.,203,0. Sn,]9ea. 5311,.0 $2.1,0. S59,00 Sue,oz],000 $43,63,6. 5342,.0 $-A. $651.000 Sus,w4,o. 54],699.000 $375,111 5339,. 5274.011 Stz6,4v,6o6 563,6tz.DOO S41%D 53].6. 5].,.6 5131,0110. $686.6.006 -1- $60,0. $845.0 $t3s,ee9,6DO A1Aa1,6.6 5144,.6 $638,.. $922,000 2033 $1a2,Ofi],0. $8.,662,.. 650. 55241. $474,0. 5996,000 508-ld04l rymrml 53SM7,0 $3$512,000 51.079,000 $56],.0 $513,0. $1,0.9.000 - $611,.0 5553,0. $1,164,000 $]63,563,0. $101,158.0 $654,.0 5595,0. $1,353,000 $]03.0 $6340. $1,366,000 $1.4,041000 5116,636,000 $758x. $686- $1,461,000 812x0. 2039 $3%4.6,1]1 5124,9.9x00 650. 5 $.35x. 51,51],000 $f95,fs.,o10 $133,]53,OOD 650. $%9,. $.880.$ $929 841 $1,655,000 2001 $204,386.000 $141,981,0. 650. 5.4.89- .00 ,0. $1,.)0.000 20.12 5216,093,000 5152,688,000 650. 5.6)89 $992,000 $898,0. $1,890,00 20.13 52x6,306,000 5162,899x00 650. 5.4)89- $1,059,000 5957,0. 92,-,W6 Sutrlb44l ev 5] $1303.0. 515,3 000 $335,016,000 51]3,6UA00 51,329.0.0 $1,021,0. $2,150,000 2.1 5246. 5144 943x. - 51,2 $1,1 $2,2 $25.,240,000 Mr 51,219,. $1,152,. $2,436,010 $-,-.M. $2.,349,0. $1,36],.0 51,231,. 52,592,000 52.3922,000 $x22,51],000 $3M6,.0 $1,30.,0. 52,]54,000 $x9],].1,000 $336,3.6x00 $3,536,.0 $1,390x. 5x,926,000 2%0 5312,369,000 $250,963,000 51,6310. $1,475,0. 53,106,000 2051 $32.,721,000 $266,316 x01 51,]31,000 $1,566,0. 53,297,000 5313,991,000 5282,476.000 I ft 51836,000 $1,661,0. 53,497.000 53..94..1 5298-- 53,94.00, $1,761,0. 53..0e.000 44�2n�.D1i $x3193.0 436,2,0. u3]536. 1mlams31.. 73],]3...6 5x4,%1000 $sx,av,000 ScenariO200ty Growth ' a es Cft 2861:e s61,.o5,00D 561.41D,o0o 53.005.0. sm,.D s17D. 539.DaD 56.594.000 56.1¢9,11 540.000 5380. 5.6000 $]0.96].000 59562.111 562,.0 $56,00 $11 e.000 $.6,539,000 413631..1 463.1 $17,.. $16x,000 4..,124,.0 $18915000 $116.6 $91,.. $2.,.o $7,334,000 $20,929,DDD $136,. $123,D. $259,000 $%,573,060 $3537.,6. $1w1.o s147,D. $312,606 491,08],000 511,692.000 $-,- 5174,D. s367.DD6 495.861,000 s34,456.00D $224,.0 5203,0. W7..D 41.923.000 $39.51].000 s $227,.0 523,0. 54¢5006 wbTamlrye9�oJ $1,391600 5x,366,000 $3,643,0. 51.,28,000 Se4,e6z.DD6 I.M 1292,166 $2.A. $556,000 $ss19n,o. $sgn,006 $329... $29.x. $626,000 30x6 $118,010,000 $56,605.000 650. $368,0. $3330. $701,000 $]24,408,000 $63,003.000 $610,.0 $3]80. $]80,000 5131.194,000 569,]69.006 Sssa,o6o 5453-,0.S ,- 5864x01 513x,393,0. 5]6.s9s.D00 $5.,000 5943.000 St46,636,606 5¢6,634.6. $ 5497,0. 51665.6 5154,131,1. $9x,]311. $.3,000.- $546,0. $1,168,000 $659,000 6596,.. $1,255,000 2033 $1.1,850,000 $110,665,000 650. 5.6]28 5]16,0. $N9,0. 51.3fi],0.0 504Tdf30 rymrml 54,483.0 $4,/150. 53298,000 $181530,0. $128125.1] $]81,.0 $706,0. $1,617.000 $]914.,0. $130,399,000 $848,.0 5767,0. $1,615,000 5228,]1¢.6. $3.13.,.0 59x4,6. 5.31A. $1,749,000 5216,242.0. Sxs,e7,6o6 I.n $996,0. 5499,0. 51.93.6 5336,5680. $165,163x. 510.6,.0 $971x. $3,045,000 2.9 5339,611000 51.8,x.,000 650. $3,158.0 $1044x. $2,206,000 5353,458,D. $193,053,000 650. I.. 51347,. $1,129,0. 5,327,000 2001 5368160,000 $206,155,. 650. 5.6)89 51344x00 $1215x. $2,559.000 20.12 5283])1,000 5222,366,. 650. 5.6.89 51165,00 51307,0. $2,752,000 2063 53.,368,000 5x38963,000 650. 5.6)89 $1,553x00 $1,605,0. 52,958,000 wbrOM e6 $1 363 $103]80. $3166 100 533]94x,6. 5346,446,6. 51%a,.0 51 514,1. 53,1.6,000 5336. 52]4 340,00. 51.e $16 $3,1 5346, $285,.5x410 53.9 51.2 53,6 53],4¢6,1. $316,183,666 LN'.1 Sl,ess,0. $3,914,000 53959e6,o0D $33s,sa3,666 .1 S4,ts3,000 5423,274,100 53639]3x. .0 5 3,130,0. 54,4.4,111 2050 4502,000 5.6]fl9 .0 $,2]9,0. 54,]99,000 .59 000 $,43.,0. 55,131.000 5501x240.34,]27,.00 $m3933,0p .1 52,..3,9l00 1mtaz6s31 .6 536,.3,.0. $77p96,0o0 27 4/23/2014 Scena'Ai. Optimistic Growth �vaw2• 511.405,000 $64.752,000 $3,3)],000 Sz2,o0o $m,0x0 $42.000 565196.000 56996.000 540,000 541,000 546000 5)x.101.000 $10.]96000 $]0,000 $63,000 5133.000 576601,000 $14,e66.o66 S97,a0o $e7,6a6 5124,000 Sm,603,000 $19,196.000 $3x0,440 $133,.4. $336,000 2019 590,214,000 $13,719.001 $187,x.0 $160,.4. $39s,o.o $90,3x2,0.0 $x9,94001 $321,000 $19..m $311,0.0 $30102,000 $33,94].000 5221,000 52o0,6m $421.060 51009zo.o00 $32,sts,000 520],000 $232,am $499.000 $1xs.es1,o.5 S4sp46.0xo s 59'0 5267,00 $6.0 wbtumlryev-) $44x4,... 51,331,.0. $x.806.0. $ss3,1s9,0.0 $51,]64.000 $3360.0 $3o4Ax. $640,... 5319,900,0.0 Sse,49s.o00 $390.000 $_,. $724,000 10x6 $1x],0]1,000 $65,666,0.0 65000 56x7,000 $396000 $813,.0 $]34,)14,000 $]3,3m,0.o $6]],0.0 $431,.m smum 53ax,es9,o.o $91,454,.00 S-.- Se79Ax. $1.008.000 Su1,s41,oW 59.,131,000 $-.- S53.,0m $1,116.0.0 51m,]940.0 599191,0.0 5644x.. $-,O. 51,230,000 51]0,683,000 51o9,xse,o00 $71x,000 $822.x. $1152,000 $191,193,000 $119,]]ea.0 $77%. $7o4,0m $1,493,000 3033 $191,400,000 $130,995,000 65000 5951,000 $)]0,000 $1.621,000 Sue-l468lrymrml S6nL... $sv $10.966000 52.,31110.0 $142104 5920 54,OW $1,719,00 523].3900 51.013,0ox 5995,0x. 51,996,000 5234249,0.0 S169121.0xo 51,9m,aw 5910,04. 52,491,000 Sz46244,0.4 5t83,e3s,66x 51,990,x00 51,182,.x. $2,606,000 5161,)23,0x0 5195/1646/ S1,m6 .. 52 51,1]9,. .469.0x0 2039 5396,940,000 $-,-A00 65000 $ip03,Wx $1,969400 $9,6]9,000 5x94,663,000 $252,-,00 65000 51.-,00 $1,6)9,000 $3.129,000 2041 5313,667.000 $2$2,363,000 65000 5.8299 51,640,x00 $1,483,000 $3,333,000 20.42 5333,)31,000 5273,336000 6500D 5.8299 51,T1x,000 $1,601,000 53,371,000 30.43 5355,143,000 5393,738,000 6500D 5.6)89- 51,509,00 $1,]3],000 53,636000 Sutrr4M eu $Ix 96x.4. $I 4s $x6m1- 5396,994,xxx ffi'�:9,40 52,11- $1,8 i,w 53119,0x1 5am"" 96,41 $2,2 526 $4,z 5424,412,000 6],606 52106,060 5z.1s a,6m 54,044,0.0 5401192,000 9;060 Sz,sfi6,mo $2,321,6.. $g887,0oo 5420/06020 01,060 2,]09,400 $654,000$01],018,000 13,000 52,960,440 Sz,sel,.a. $0,646,000 2 5551,320,000 15,000 53,156,00 $2,890,000 56064,000 2051 555]po6000 03,00 53,419,000 $3,692,0x0 56,511Ss25g96o.0 94,000 56619000 59,919.m 5662.oao.o0o 26006 53,932p00 $9,561,000 5].492.000 43an�.6ai s:9, 026, m.i�mt4-x.531 Ss.,tz6000 S95pw,o.o Capital Projects • Such capital projects may include, but not limited to the following: kr s : ➢ Roadway Improvements J�,. ➢ Parking Improvements ➢ Infrastructure Improvements ➢ Signage Improvements r.. ➢ Recreation Improvements • Due to the low increment revenue forecasts under Scenario 1 (Historical Growth Rates) �r and shortage of the dollars required to implementthe Plan, it is critical that the City leverage the increment dollars with various financial programs 28 4/23/2014 ,,JjjAj=jects Roadway Improvements a. Construct roadway/streetscape along East Park Ave. (Phase 1)and �or� West Park Ave. (Phase 2) b. Construct sidewalk, streetscape, and curb-cuts and landscaped "a median reconfiguration along Ridgewood Ave. (US-1) C. Construct enhancements/traffic calming on Ridgewood Ave. (US-1) �- intersections c_r I. Ridgewood Ave. (US-1)and Park Ave. ii. Ridgewood Ave. (US-1)and Ocean Ave. II iii. Ridgewood Ave. (US-1)and TurgotAve. iv. Ridgewood Ave. (US-1)and Indian River Blvd. v. Ridgewood Ave. (US-1)and Falcon Ave. 5 d. Enhance mid-block crossings using pavers or decorative concrete along Ridgewood Ave. (US-1) e. Construct multi-use trail/bicycle lane connecting to the Volusia County's East Central Regional Trail via Park Ave. to the Indian River f. Improve roadways, sidewalks, street trees, and lighting on all other - streets Parking Improvements a. Create on-street parking along portions of East Park Ave. b. Develop small,dispersed parking areas to support the East Park Ave. redevelopment �r"r 6 i4 nl 29 4/23/2014 Capital Projects Infrastructure Improvements ,- a. Improve stormwater conveyance, treatment, and - discharge to include the development of a master �. stormwater management plan and evaluate/implement other treatment alternatives b. Construct the Northern Gateway to serve as an aesthetically pleasing stormwater pond C. Construct potable water lines and facilities connecting to the existing water system, and extend central sanitary sewer service d. Place utility lines underground wherever feasible or lit relocate to rear of the development e. Facilitate adequate bandwidth and telecommunications infrastructure to ensure fiberoptic and other digital infrastructure along the - Ridgewood Ave. (US-1)corridor Capital Projects Signage Improvements >, ! a. Construct the Northern Gateway at Ridgewood Ave. �� `J (US-1)and the Edgewater City Limits (Northern Gateway). - I b. Develop entrance signs/features into the Downtown as part of the Park Ave. Enhancement Plan at Park . Ave. and Ridgewood Ave. (US-1), and Park Ave. and Riverside Dr. C. Install themed street signs to provide clear street identification for emergency services and visitors d. Install wayfinding signs to provide direction information to community resources and other designated destinations iLt n 30 4/23/2014 ,,QU4j=jeCtS Recreational Improvements a. Redesign George R. Kennedy Memorial Park as a focal point of the Downtown by turning the park into a primarily pedestrian zone b. Coordinate with Volusia County to connect the Volusia County's East Central Regional Trail via Park Ave. to the EX Indian River. _ FDCCWATEM C. Enhance the Riverwalk with seating areas and decorative pedestrian lighting to further complement the trail system and connection to the Downtown - d. Improve Hawks Park Recreation Complex by developing FGgo ,�:;. --_ coordinated activities and programs, strengthening the physical connections for pedestrian access and comfort, and planning for future physical improvements by creating a parks and recreation master plan -r - e. Develop new pocket parks and plazas with pedestrian amenities and focal point features to create public gathering spaces Non—Capital Project • Resources can be used for administrative expenses and overhead of the CRA, and r other non-capital programs: .: r Regulatory, operational and management r Marketing, promotions,special events, economic development �.t r Facade/property improvement grants • �`� No Volusia County increment revenues will be used for non-capital programs r' i I 31 4/23/2014 • Total cost estimate for the capital projects is$57,744,459.00 • 40-year duration is necessary due the low increment revenue projections • There is an estimated deficiency of$4,933,459.00 over the 40 years under Scenario1 (Historical Growth Rates) 590,000.000-00 5w,o9D,DDO.Ga mlNieroriml $7o,DoD,lnam ate:) 560 000 000 00 Capital PrgectTotal-57744,459.00 55.0.0,000.00 5aa5.000.00 55ao5,000.00 53.us0,000.00 53.300,000.00 5e.z5 o,000.00 540�G 000.E 5a3.O6O,000.00 $1O,a6O,000.00 543,a1O,000.00 .000 MOM z Sn,]m,AOa.aa Szs,m5,A0A.AA Ssz,au,A00.m E 520,1100,000.OD ozlurysrowlnAS 510,000,000.60 55.za5,000.00 55.566,000.00 $zasa,00 W — SOW ]10 10 Years 111O20Years ]ILO 40 YPM 5a,aa3,000.00 5ap5s,000.00 Sa.zva,000.00 $34,521,000.00 $35.zu,000.00 S6s,]o5,000.00 Scenario M7lHistorical 51.941,OW.00 $G 950,000.00 $43,920,000.00 Sw.69A,A00.AA 536AAZ,AOA.AA 5]7.ase,am.m IS hIRafael 031OP3mis�OTAS —SClna IID 21GTY GmwtR etas) Patesl 52.457,000.00 $9,298,000.00 $65,741,000.00 SS,aaa,000.00 55,33.,000.00 Sz,a06,000.00 —Scenarl 3(ORtimMlD $s,n5,000.00 $s,5aa,000.00 $5o,ays,000.00 Grovnn Rates) S2,e06,M0o.aa $10,895,000.00 $61,759,000.00 Saz,v35,000.00 S3a,aza,000.00 SaS,asv,000.00 5m,5x,000.00 5as,33a,000.00 59s,wa,a00.m Capital ' • Planning Area I (North Limit to Lamont Street) PArea 1-W-1,Limit to Lamont Street Cme8ory qdd Tyre h0 MtlTem LenO term Tart AnlitlpekO FUntlin9 n-10Ylal (1mw Yrs) a1�0 Yrsl 3OUress o bti.a Raertey uB6. CiryB Cwnry mormnem RbG-1 Arycd(11-1) Du,oratrva Pavers,Mlih k RamnOesl-1 $itlmvalk5vee6cwe CmzsinAS.$gerWkz,$Ocel $]58y05W i]sB.2A6A0 p,516,w0.w W-11 Trees,Medan La00uepin2, FOGTF3rerWRlrek S,W F.rnlsN DIty HCwnh lnc pp venue ve Petl®Irun Ggnrs, $105,3]0.w f1063]nA0 5210,]10.00 ClrylGuunry( CumB GUllwr6ltlamfks, Clry BCtimrylrnrenam .11—Teuam $-05,329.09 $BS BS'1.W f191,w0A0 ounty� RNenuealGblC orali$treal Teem L9 GranlslPmrak city 3cwnry'—W D'avrcW ASenue Demretre PeOesNen LIAM1M w6,030w 9wA33w $920]0-00 --l'—W Sheel ireea GreOSlRirele Curb&Gu3en Sidew4ka. C11y 8 Cwnh Imre�ant Naanea Dnre 539,]1500 $98215W f]3,133A9 Revmues�Clty,COUnry� CumB GuOa.Sitlexelks. City BCwnry lrcrenem Rb NSn Dear $03,d30A0 Pevenue4CltylC9untyl 33W1 Tees Grm�b�Priwle CumB GS,itlevAks, Ciry BCwnryy lnmmnenr WkrldjsA— vs Petleslrun LBM1b, $39,21500 838,215W $]3,AWA3 Rwenu®IGryIC9unryl eco m S9ee1 Trees GraBalPireb Cum BGUnan Sr,L,,t, Cry&Cwnry me 1 W RNersl0e D5va Dtt9rwve PeOeslrfan Lgvk, 590,82090 510,Bi0W 531,810-00 RevmumlClhlCOUnbI $trrel irecs GrmYPmrzle Cum BGmMr,smelralke. Glry&Cwnry me MaalnOdm lane DttOMva Petleslrhn Lgvk, $1m.8/9.m f10B8]a.W $218,81&00 RerenueslClhlC9unbl Curb a Gu9er,@tlewalNS, Cly BCwnry Inmmnenr A— 538,529-09 989,529.W $n3A10.m rcounry� orm�8hea�I Tgiteesn hA GraAalPrrvab Curb BGUmx,Sidev , Ciry BCwnry lneenem n Seael 63.]&00 1 $heal irees GraAalPmreb Ciry BCwnh lnaanem 015 G9unb Roatl Decoralrve PetlesOian�DgM1m, W.155,W 515515509 5310,310.00 —lblGounryl Sorel areas GranWRMaM 3W-TOM &,]19,05-0& $1,713,031-00 wp26,1w.w 32 4/23/2014 Capital Projects Planning Area I (North Limit to Lamont Street) PiannI,I'Area 1-North Llmll W Lamont Stmt Prelec't Category Pw}d lyp $IrglTrm YY Trm IergTrm Telal MNCfpaletl Farr&rg U•IOYNI 11140Ytq 2140Y.1 SoPrces Clq&Gamry 11cityl NoMarn Gabway 3200,00000 fM0,0... RevanuealCttyl Sbte GranWPrivab Cmetrua Siammvebr Fauliliea Ciry&Gmlrty lnxement b Aapmmadab Future $1.500,000.00 $1,.0000.00 RevenuealCityi Da JOpmenk Sbte GranklPrivab PMa01e MV System Cily Increment .w- 5100,000.00 51.,0... RevmueslCilyn W P tm Wat w Privets Sanitary Seaer Sanitary Server$ystem Cly Increment Exam 59..00000 §200,Om.. ReumueslGltylGmnW POVaIe UntlegroundRNOrate City&CCUrdy lrgement VAIiry Llms Ritlgewmtl $1,740,00000 $1.70,000 00 5]100,000.00 gevenuesiCOyMlvab Wit, Avenue(US 1) Prwitle blemmmunica0on CityBCwMy lrxxement '-Oruclu2-PMgewootl 5500,00000 5500,000AO 51.000,000.00 Revmu�COylPrlvale Avenue(US i) S00-T..)1 3200,000.00 1 5;540.0.. $3,70,000.00 9,480,000.00 Capital Projects Planning Area I (North Limit to Lamont Street) JMMJI Planning Area 1-North Limit m Lamont Street Project Category Project Type SM1On Term t Long Term Anticipated Funding Y.) (1 (21.1 Sources tandsoaping,Slta Fern,,rgs. Ciry S Ceunly Increment N—rn Gateway Park petlestrian LigM1ling..Nalkway $200,000.00 $200,000.00 Reve,-Grmisl ECHOGrani S.b.TOW 52.,.0. 1 GOmmpntty RZJavNOpmenl Fetleml HlgOwaylGtty& GYeway Area Gateway $$.aoo.00 5&0... County lncmmeM Revenu—ranlz Demrelive13,4 wy!'- Federal High.WIC4& Shee[Sgnage sntl Neme Pleks $�•�� $30,000.00 C..ylnuemad RevenueslGrank Dxnrethre 9reek0aay— FatlaaI Highm/Ctty& W,ftding Signage System antl Name Plates 591,000.00 $2).0..00 Comty lnpemem Revenuea�Grank Sob-TOmI $8,000.00 Ss0,000.00 558•.0.. Total 50.,000.00 51,303,050.00 .,459,054.. 510,184,1[&00 33 4/23/2014 Capital Projects Planning Area 2(Lamont Street Ocean Avenue) Planning Area 2-LamoM Street to Ocean Avenue Protect CMeAOry Pwjtt Type —Term Mid Term Lang Term Total ArN d FUntling (1 40 Y.) (11-20 Y,.) (21.10 yrs) 8ourws DecoreAVa ROatlwaY Llpbta Clrya C-1,Increment Decdallva Pavers,Mi—k Ritlgewgotl Avenue ltls-1) Crresq,G,d lks,$treet $394766.00 $39".. 3].,52880 Re+a„wsFedu9 5dewalWblreekualre T_SbEiantantlsaPi0g. HiglrwaYl FDOTIGmMSIPavas She Farnisk'ngs Cum a Gutter,Skle 4 EartPark AVeme DBCOra0ve PatleeMan Lighh, Qlya COUnly lnmeeant EnM1ancemuA Demratlse Pautvs,Slreel $5]8,336.00 $FMM.00 Ra+mues YCmw frees,glke Lanes,SlM Gmn151Pavak FumisMtgs CurbBGu.,,Svkwalks, West Park Avenue Oacorahve PSdes0ian Lighk, qyB County lnrreaent EnhancemMO Demreliw Pavu's.. $77267400 $TTA570.00 Revenua tylC—yI areas,01ke Lyres,Slte GrenluPavele Fumishi s Curb B Gu0nr,SMewalks, Glly a County lnrrtment Lamonlgreet Decorative Pxles9ian Lighk, $Z7G,154.W $214,166.00 5610,8}8.00 ReJmuesKAtylCouMyl D-1.Pavers.SI-I GunSPBVak Trees.She Furkshin0s Corby Gutter,SitlewalMe. glyB Caunly Increment Witinson A�atue 13ecoreAVe 1 atlea0ian Lighh, $1]4592.00 $17459280 SWUM ReretaesN2tylCOarttyI Demallva Pavers,6l reel GunWPrivak Trees,She Ftmishings CurbBGuRar,Sklewalk. atys CPanlylncrement E.Rne BIUII Street Osore0ve Petlaeaian Lighh. $283,71200 $283,712.00 S66T,121.00 Reams-tylC I Dematius Pauers,Slreel Treys,S9e Furishltgs GunlslPn— Cum BGuXacsitlewalks. QIyB Caunly lncrenent Palm Way Dsaor.b.Petlestrian Lighk, 573,65500 373,65fi.1L S11i,312.00 RevenuesA2tylCwtrtyl Decaralha Pevers.5lrael Trees,S0e F—hlnAS GmnhRMek Capital ' • Planning Area (Lamont to Ocean Avenue) Planning Area 2-LamoM Street to Ocean Avenue Project Category Prop Type OM1Ort Term Mid.. Lang Term iobl Anticipatetl FUntling 11-10 Yrs) (11-20Yrs) (2110 Yrs) Sources CurbBGP Gitlewalks, QryB COUnIy Increment W.Pirre BlNf Streal Decorative PetleslBan Lights, $578,156.00 f516,15d.00 ReumuesNFtWCartryl Street Trees GrantelPmak Curbs G-,,Sitlewalke, grya County Increment Waelem A.— D rabv Petleshian Lighh, $119,35D00 5119,350.00 RaumueaN%tylCwrttyl 61 Trees GrenlslPrivak Curb8GU5er,SMewaltr. qty b County Increment WM1etxel Street Oecomtive PetlesMan LlAhb, $114,23580 $114,235.00 RevetuesK2tylG I —Trees GmntvP— CurbaGOher,Gklewalks. Qty a County lncreecnt Bottler GI- Dxora0ve Petl .'Lighk, $231,88080 6281,880.00 Reven0e Il Cwtrtyl Street Trees Gm0tslPnvale Cum 6 Gu0ar,Sdm46 qry 6 County l—ment AkAmacgreel Dec..PetlesMen Lighh, $51,150.00 $51115080 RarenuesQyiC—Y, Street Tracts Gre—i- Gurb8GU0er,SMawzlks. Qrya GOYnly Increment Oaean Avenue Dewm0S Petles0ian Lighh, $180,860.00 5100,060.00 Reuenr.,NdlGanryl Street Trees GranteRrivale Lum BGa0er,5kkwel0.s. QIyB Caunly lncement OM County ROatl Decorative Petleshian L,ghh, $955p90.00 59&5,190.00 RavmueslCihylCounryl Gtreet Trces Gmn4Rrlvata Sub-ToW $979.100.00 51,979,169.00 53,015,]43.00 $6421,90100 On5lreet PalUlg lEasl Pa0l RemrtslrtKt SOewalk, C9yl0aama0t Aretue) Cmstruvt BUlb-0uk aM PavirM $250.000.00 5250,000.00 ReuenueslGranklRivate Snail Parking Areas(East Publk:ParkiNN01lloPrivele $100.000.00 $2V,WD80 $250.000.00 5550,000.00 qty lnaament PaM Avenue) Parklnm Parlrehhlp Assistance RauxnueslGranhlMVah Sub-ToW 5950,000.00 900,000.00 $250,000.00 5800,000.00 34 4/23/2014 Capital Projects Area 2(Lamont Street Ocean Avenue) Plinnln AArei2-Lamont$tmM to Ocean AvenYe Project Catagmy Projast TYN SMrt Term Mid Term Lang Term Tam Amicipered Fun ding (1 40 Yrs) (11-20 Yn1 (2+10 Yrs) Sources Sigint—Maet Acme, 0N&Counlylnuenent Ridgewood Avenoe(US-1) Oelaragre PedgYian Landings RemoavFedia and Park Avenue and Cr® 1h,R—, $600.00HO HigWayl Pevem FOOTIGrenM Sight,¢,Mast Alms, GIy&GCUnlylnc-a I Ridgewood Avenoe(US1) DewmgrePetlestrlan Lantlings ReamevFedia and Ocaii Avenue and Crmawdo"Roadway $605,05.55 8800.000.00 Higbeyl Pevere FUOTIGrenM Srb-Taal f8o0,o00.00 $K.H.p f+10a,a0a as Oownbwn l,�sra Sbrmwati $115,000.00 8115,000.00 GNBCounlybcremenI Study RerenueslGry Coretrucl Sbmmekr Facilities GNB Caunly Increment Sbrmwaer laPAtlress Flooding Issues $100,000.00 $2,2W,000.W $2,YIO,.OAO Reve oXlyl Stele GrenHRdvate Cgstrud$brmrvate FxiliSes GN f Counly Increment ro Attanmotlale Future 6WAW.W 8",000,000.. f9,500,000A0 Reve.eslGryl OevelOpmerds StaleGren6Rdvate Sanitary Sewer Syslem CiNlnnement Sanitary Sewer Er.Tinsion 8100,000.00 $100,000.00 RevenUadX"li IW P ea UMargmdndTiebcale Utllity Lnea-Ridgswaotl $1,&0,00000 81,090,000.00 f$,6G,.dAG GN6COUnly Increment A...(US 1)id Park Re'amcwUlyNriva@ U01111a Avenue Ird — elecommdncilnn b0aslydclure-Ridgeylo. 850000000 $500.00000 5+,000,00000 GNB Gounly Increment Avenue A-11 and Park Ray.ueeA2MPrlvale Avenue Sub-TGW $215,000.00 58,1/0,000.00 .,590,.G.W $11,895,000.00 Capital ' • Planning Area (Lamont to Ocean Avenue) Planning Area 2-Lamont StreM to O<een Avenue Project Category Project type Shod Term Mid Term Long Term ToW Adb,ipeted Funding (1-10 Yrs) (11-20 Vrs1 (2110 Yrs) Sources Provide SWCWres,Walk-ways, GN8 Cuunly Increment George R.Rennedy Memorial Oem I.Pevee PdbsNan 81500".00 $2,000p00.00 jS,.G"00A0 RevenueslGmntsl Park Redevelapmed bghting,Landacaprg,Sin, ECHOGmrd Fumishirga Vdusb Cd.rye East Central Mull Ua.Tr O,Siptage,Site $100,.0.. 5100,000.00 CINBC.nN lnpremenl Regbnal Tral COnnedim FumlSMngs,Led—plug Rexmd,ac n G- Rivemwlk Erhancemmt Oecora0ve Petle""Lighb, $100,000.00 5100"00.00 CIry6Caunty lncremem Landscaprg,81k FUm'ahings RevandeslCOUnNffl— SYb.TGW 811]00,000.00 $2,000,000.00 SO,MNON 1etlera1 HigM1-Xl & Gateway 2 Owmlmvn Gelewaya 812,00000 812,000.00 Cwnry lnammem RavenueslGranle Gemrithm Sreakaway P- Fe land HlghwaylCky& SVOet Sgnege antl Name Plales S50,WO.W W.WO.W $80,0..00 C—,lnpaneor RevenueslGmms 0eoxa He Break away POba F—I High"Xl & WayWing Sid a System tlName Plales 520000.00 510,000.00 $50,000A0 Colnty ld—. RevenuaelGrenka Sub-Tpbl $12,.GM SM-00 .G,.O.te $14000.00 TaW $8,60,1..00 39,.8,168..0 �,T05,11$.00 $28,588,0..00 35 4/23/2014 Capital Projects (Ocean Planning Area 3 Planning'—3-Ocean Avenue[o Marion Av.. SM1OR Temt Mitl Term Long Term Al Funding 1-fOYrs tbx.Yrs) 1x1d0Yrs) °' nt Sources Decordive POatlxal UgMe Cdy&COUnry ln;remem Rpgevmaa A,meo ius-tl Dec.reu.e Parek..Mia G«x Sltlewelk,'6VeeL=_apo Gosskgs,9aexdhs,6treet 9fd6,06000 �IB,O6VW S1,g%,1x0.00 R Hghweyl erel Trees,—k ,Lanaseeping, 'CC H r-Irivau S,m FOrniedngs Cub B Gutlen Sitlewallce. CityB County In.�m,eM Cwneu9wlArenue pwora.re PeleNian Ughk, f34.100.0g 334,tWW 31,21.1 RevenuesttllylCOUnb1 Cub&GUtle?Sltlewallu, CM1yBCOUrylnreaemem waoaerAreo� Sagtma i30.1m.w $se,x.0.1 �Grsul%ire.,gro'-111 Oar SlraelTUrenn Ug CA&GYI.r,Si—K GM1yBCOUnry Ino®„em AVen,n an Ugh 0.00 k, Mill $3M1.10 w 51,x00.00 Oem unA571COUnryI Sbe9Trees RnGra,WPrivak CA&GUIkr,Sltll—ll¢, ChyB C"I'lnaune. Uemlahlresbnl an Ughk, Sa],510m 5n,st0o0 $11-m —llYICOOnryI mre PmT Demr 61red Trees R GranklPrluak tatty&Gbunry Inmm� lake Plve Dewra.re PetleNIe UAAk, StOg,300,W 310g,3W,W Sxw,6O6.6o Reve,—.l,`C ,bl Slretl Ten Gra,kiPrivxu Cub&GUeer,Slaewa0u, CM1yB C"t In.remeM muniry��Ve an Ughq 1T,1x11..D SsF,tat1 Illtl,x00.00 :LOUnryI ,algae Petleuri �HJIy 90mrTreea 6raiulPrivau Cuh&GUtler.Gltlewalls, (gy&CbunN I—It Turyd I, GttoreWe PlesVlan UAA.. .111. $31x,1.W 3635.56.1 Reva0ueslCltylCOUnbI SVaMTren Granki- Cub&Gu1r,Sitle'xelle, Cuy&�unly lncmmani Orange Arerere Daroralrve PMeprian Ugh., 3u,6250g $426x5.W 511x50.0. Revenum!Ciry,TOUnry, Cub&GUtler,Sltlewalhs. Cq'CO nrynn,TUn Magndla AVenw p0mrdhrep-1,n Ughk, 5111„NTIN $1116071 3gx0013.m RevenuttlGllylGOUnryI BVetl Tren GranklRlveM Cub&GUeer,S'raewdeu, CbyBCOUnry lrauneM ea weer Dawrelbe Pekelrian UAA., 536.490W 336A90.1 3'0,10.0. ,®NSry:LOUnryI SOmr Traea Cub&GUtler,SltlswaI.. CVyB C—I,lnaunam onAwoua OxorabrePMesVlan Ughk, S1C.1,.1W $13335100 SxM,txx.ro ucHxNlCOUnryI —Trees RavGranWP- --I I S1,1B,A1AO S1}90,61>00 35.19)ZOL00 Capital ' • (Ocean Planning Area 3 Planning Area 3-Ocean Avanue to Marion Avanue SM1OR Term MIOTn Long Tn -Il.NeGFUnNng Project Category Project type TUaI $igbtlinl.Mast Arms, Cily&COOntylrem0 I Ritlgawmtl AVenu(J1 1) ge d.PIAAN LendRg6 RerenuaslFetlersl antl T"F tAvenue aw Crosswalks,U. ww'A� E600,000.0. Hghwayl FDOTIGren. Sub--1 S6DD,000.00 me,W0.e0 Cuolrod Sbrmwaler Fxiilia Cily&Cwmy Ircrement Smrmxalu 1oA®mmodam Fu lure simo'OOOm $1500000.00 55110 Douc Revenu®ICityl oavaloPman. slam cranmmrvele P.- A- Ob mcramern 6yansion $P00.000,00 $100,000.00 5300,000.00 RevmueelCibR3renk! Pombm Werer antl Private 9animry5ewer Sani Clryln ...t mrySewer SYStan $100.000.00 3100,000.00 Rwu'1ueslClry:>;mnLJ Egaansion Private UrAelground6telrcam Clly a coomy lrvemant Ulillly LlnesWBgexwtl $1,580,000.00 $1,580,000.00 33,110,000AO pavey,u®ICilylFl"rvak IMgies Avenue US1 PmvYJemlewmmunlglh0 Cily&CwMy Iraement nhlVUClure-Ndl, 0 $500,mw $500000w $1100m"o —es'CIIyIPrNele Avenue US1 SubTaW $3A60,000.00 53160,000.00 $i,551.a. 36 4/23/2014 Capital Projects (Ocean Planning Area 3 71. -Ocean Avenue Lo Marion Avenue y Project Type ShOH Term MH Term Long Term Taal MNClpated FUnding (tl0vrsl (11-m vrs) 1210 Yrsl Sources Walkways,Restropms,Con- Clty&County Increment on,3gnage,ligNIN,SlH $18a0ODC0 UP"Lr„rr $2CC,CCOCC $Sw,000.00 ReyenaeslGmntsl Furnohinga,IAndscaDing. ECHO Grant G"P,mpmve— Recre t ll P.M. Party Master Plat $50,000.00 $w,000.m City BCaunly lncremenl RevenueslCounrylGranls swroeAl awo,00aoo s$oo,aw.. uoo,000.00 a$oo,ado.ao Davative Ereakaxay POb Fedwal High.A lChy A Shen39nme entl Name Plates $BO,OODAO $w,0.m County lnrremaM RavenueelGrenH DemaliueRreakaxay Poles Ferrel High"/CR& Wayfintling&gouge System ntl Name Plates SMIM00 MAHAO Canty lncremad Revenues!GranH Sub-Total $10,010.00 iw,0..m TAW $.awe. K-,—W "Am'.. $11,86I,ROa00 Capital ' • Planning Area I (Marion Avenue South) CAPITAL NORN PUN Planning Area 4-Marion Avenue 5.Nh woieHCate0orY ProleuTyro �1�orrsl IMtagrut p1i6YH) THa nnriasemrFOmmg oema oad yLghk, clryec4un�F�ment ammGve Pa1Vm,Mid Al. CroHings,$ida�alks,Sbeat S]ffi,560m SI65.5wm 51,101,110.00 Gtra6wro S l roes,Medlan LI—PhV. 6vm P ml Ste FmnHM1Ses aryetmo41..mml m�m.,Ll- s2m,Nmm $2Ll,9B.w $wr,.aw R.adcaI Iyl CI,—lrcremml mace slrem �c Llpw, $4egB0oo 846,eg0.00 M-. I ,Iyl CuN B Gueer,gldewalks, Ciryetwnry Ircrement n nee mn Ligm, M6mso0 g46,0gb00 $9omm uesrcirylCaunlyl re651ree1Tren R GrsblPrivate Cirye-41....I D.da ren Lq- $Ht,M— $141,515M $10,100.. ualClrylCOUnryI CAk&Dutler,fildewalNS. Clry&C4unry Inrement Viglnla hYren en LlgW N1,I40.W WI,I40.W i%,4wm ueaiCNylCaunIN, Oemntive R.d.yLOnb, GIY&�unrylrcaremenl 9ver NaAZroH 0 Sven Trees,Medea $1n,5�m $1TI,S65.W 105A1.. Re Higtnveyl re LandscyinA,Ste FUrmsM1irys PLOTN?anEIPiivde CAPAr,Sitle LII CiryBCaunrylrcremenl Bastin Rmd —.2 PetlesYian LI9YA5, w6.4B6A0 566,49a00 w$P,Sww RerenueLClrylCOUnryI SVrcl Trees GisNPnyale Cur680utler,$HewlNa Gly&QUnry lrcremenl Pvenue ren LighH, VIM- $9 N2- 5115,.Aw PnenuealClryl�unly� M�Sncel Tree GreilslPrivele elrye Canryl—wyll B,Nnrtitle Odra Oewrallve PedesNen Llghts, f]6A..W 96,O..W 5110,.0.. RerenuezGlrylCOanlyl 61r91Tmw GisWRlvne cityecwnry lrcremenl n avenue mn LigM1n, stm,44o.m $106,440.00 $tte,ew.w umlcirylcounlyl SubTOwl $1,11;19.10 $I,TI8,19A6 $],5µ8H.00 37 4/23/2014 II Planning Area 4-Marlon Avenue South Project Category Project Type l Term MMTam Lang Tar. TWI Makipztad Funding (1 10 Yn) 111-20 Y.) 121J Y.) Sours® Sightlinm,Maze Arms, Cily&Cmnty Imemmt R6'.—I Avanue(U31) Demm0ua Pa Ala Land,gs f00,000.00 fBggW.00 RevanuWFadard and lndim Wver Eonmd and Cna-111,Roadway Hghwayl Pavers FDCTlGrank Sighddm,Mas:A'ms, Cily&Canty Imrement Rirgswoal A—,(U&I) Donad,Pedesvian Landngs Revenu.Fk A end FMmn Avenue and Crmmllk,,POedwey $60,000.00 $60,OD0.00 Highway) Pavers FDDT..,. gu6-total Nt0.0W.W g1w,000.00 Contract Elmmwata Facilities QIyB Caonly Increment St0rmwalor roM mmodale F., $1,500,000.00 $1,50D000.00 $3AOOAOOAO Rsvx VQryl D.-P... &Na GranLVPriw£e PdaHe Wawr 3'.M Cay rooment Egvnsim $2]O,D]O.00 $200,000.00 RevenumlCirylGrank! —1,Wa @ran0 Private Sol.,Serer Senilay Bearer S".. City mcramant Erganaion $1ogO .w $100,000.00 RevenuaiiClrylGrankl Rivate UrdegroundDEelocale Clly&County lncremenl Udldy Llnes-Ridgewootl $1,820,000.00 $1,B31,Oa.00 53,aw,odaDD RevenuesKdrylPrivale Avenue(US 1) W011e Pmvitlelelecommumcalim City B Caunly Increment 9d�lruclure-Ridge.vood %OO,000W $SOO,000.CO f1,000,00000 RevenuesMAylPOVale Avanoe(US-11 Sub-Total $6,120,000.00 $3,M,OOOAO $7,9WAOOA0 Capital Projects Planning Area I (Marion Avenue South) Planning Area 4-Marion Avenue South Project CM10ory P.J.Typa Short Term Mid Tam Lang Tx. TWI Mticipaled FUndng 040 Y.) (11-my.) 121.Yn) Source Silo FU hma.Pky City 6 Caonly Increment Fadzt Parks Equipmem,landswpiryl,Blk $200,WO.CO $200,000.00 $100,000.00 RevenaeslGrantsl Fumishilgs ECHO 6 sub-sear $200,000.00 $200,000.00 5100,000.00 D—N.13,A may P.. ­1 HI h"IC&y& Shee[Sgnape d Name Plates $3Q00000 $DOA00.00 Comty lnuemem RavmueslGrank OroxatFUe 6reakaxay POln Federal HighwrylC6y& Wayfinding Sgnage System and Name Plates $20WO.W $20,000A0 Cointy lncremad RavenueslGranS Sub-Total $50,000.00 $50,000.00 total $6,2BR,1RR.0D $5,19x,122.00 $12,074,2—D Gft4ND TDTAL $IASB,100.00 $26,B77,MT.00 $26,409,122.OD $57,7",459.00 38 4/23/2014 • Mixed-use designation in the City's Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element needs to be expanded to create the Downtown and potential for higher density • City should initiate text and map amendments to the Future Land Use Element and the Future Land Use Map • Any future modifications to residential densities will , `'R i require text amendments to the Future Land Use Element • With the expansion of the mixed-use land use designation,this Plan will be fully consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan (2011) n P • Appendix E of the Plan includes Goals,Objectives, and Policies from the City of Edgewater Comprehensive Plan(2011)that are specifically addressed by the Plan — 1. City Council to adopt a resolution on the refinement of the FON and request delegation of authority to create the CRA and Community Redevelopment Area, adopt the Plan, and establish a Redevelopment Trust Fund-The resolution will include the Plan and will request Volusia County to review and consider it as part of the Delegation resolution(15 days in advance of City Council approval) 2. Submit request for delegation of authority to Volusia County 3. Receive FON and Plan approvals,and delegation of authority from Volusia County 4. Submitthe Plan to City Planning and Zoning Board to formally approve the Plan for consistency with the City Comprehensive Plan (15 days advance notice) 5. City Council to adopt a resolution to create the Community Redevelopment Area and CRA, adopt the Plan and establish by ordinance a Redevelopment Trust Fund via public hearing(15 days advance notice) 39