09-14-2016104 N. Riverside Drive
Edgewater, FL 32132City of Edgewater
Meeting Minutes
Planning and Zoning Board
6:30 PM Council ChambersWednesday, September 14, 2016
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
George Kennedy, Robert McIntosh, Pat Card, Robert Andrejkovics, David Tyree and
Michael Eichhorn
Present 6 -
Paul WrightExcused1 -
Development Services Director Darren Lear and Senior Planner Bonnie BrownAlso Present 2 -
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a.Regular Meeting - August 10, 2016
A motion was made by Mr. McIntosh, second by Mr. Kennedy, to adopt the minutes of
August 10, 2016. The MOTION was APPROVED by the following vote:
Yes:George Kennedy, Robert McIntosh, Pat Card, Robert Andrejkovics, David Tyree, and
Michael Eichhorn
6 -
Excused:Paul Wright1 -
4. OLD BUSINESS-PUBLIC HEARING
None at this time.
5. NEW BUSINESS - PUBLIC HEARING
a.VA-1611 - Christina Noyes, owner, requesting variances from Section
21-36.02(h) and (j) and Section 21-50.02 of the Land Development Code for
property located at 1902 Orange Tree Drive
Mr. Lear provided background information and staff's recommendation.
Chairman Card opened the public hearing.
Russ Noyes, 1902 Orange Tree Drive, owner, stated the structure was to cover their boat. Mr.
Andrejkovics asked if the structure would be the same height as the garage. Mr. Noyes stated it
would be at the peak of the roof.
There being no further comment of discussion Chairman Card closed the public hearing.
A motion was made by Mr. Andrejkovics, second by Mr. Tyree, to approve the variance
Page 1City of Edgewater Printed on 10/5/2016
September 14, 2016Planning and Zoning Board Meeting Minutes
from Section 12-50.02 and 21-36.02 (h) to allow a front setback of 24-feet and Section
21-36.02 (j) to allow a third accessory structure for the construction of a carport at 1902
Orange Tree Drive. Mr. McIntosh clarified that it was Section 21, not 12. The MOTION
was APPROVED by the following vote:
Yes:George Kennedy, Robert McIntosh, Pat Card, Robert Andrejkovics, David Tyree, and
Michael Eichhorn
6 -
Absent:Paul Wright1 -
b.VA-1612 - Dominick and Jill Micolupo, owners, requesting a variance from
Section 21-50.02 of the Land Development Code for property located at 300 S.
Riverside Drive.
Mr. Lear provided background information, he stated that adjacent property owners were notified of
the request and staff has received opposition. Mr. Lear stated staff recommended approval with
conditions that the driveway on East Palm Way be utilitzed for the parcel to the north and only one
driveway be permitted on Riverside Drive for the parcel to the south; construction of each residence
meet the stormwater requirements of Article V and one additional sewer lateral be required to be
constructed for the new parcel at the owners expense.
Chairman Card acknowledged a letter received from Pete Maman, 316 S. Riverside Drive opposing
the variance request.
Chairman Card opened the public hearing.
Dominick Micolupo, 300 S. Riverside Drive, owner, stated the original plan was to renovate the
property, however it was determined the renovation would be too costly. They felt it would be more
cost effective to try and split the lot.
Mr. Andrejkovics asked if they would be building two houses. Mr. Micolupo stated one now, and a
second possibly in the future. He stated the property to the south would most likely be built first. Mr.
Andrejkovics asked why they did not propose to split the parcel evenly. Mr. Micolupo stated to get
the square footage equal.
Mr. Kennedy asked how long they owned the property and if there were plans for the residences. Mr.
Micolupo stated since April and they did not have plans at this time, as they did not know what the lot
size would be.
Mr. McIntosh asked if they eliminated the possibility of building one structure. Mr. Micolupo stated
they have not eliminated that option, but it was a large piece of property and is costly, the taxes
would also be high. The issue is not only aesthetic, but financial. Mr. McIntosh asked why they did
not consider splitting the lot north/south. Mr. Micolupo felt it would be more attractive this way.
The following individuals spoke in opposition of the variance request:
Barbara Halme, 306 S. Riverside Drive
Roger Bushnell, 310 S. Riverside Drive
Don Kramer, 123 N. Riverside Drive
Page 2City of Edgewater Printed on 10/5/2016
September 14, 2016Planning and Zoning Board Meeting Minutes
Ferd Heeb, 115 N. Riverside Drive
Joe Campbell, 119 S. Riverside Drive
Larry Westfall, Ocean Avenue
Jean Haughwout, 200 N. Riverside Drive
Les Haughwout, 200 N. Riverside Drive
Sandy Bushnell, 310 S. Riverside Drive
Mr. McIntosh asked about the dock rights. Mr. Lear did not think a second dock would be permitted.
Board members discussed the pros and cons of this variance request.
Mr. Micolupo stated there were smaller lots all over Riverside Drive with beautiful homes on them
and he felt he was not creating something new in the area. Mr. McIntosh stated those lots were not
split, Mr. Micolupo was requesting to split the lot.
There being no further discussion Chairman Card closed the public hearing and entertained a
motion.
A motion was made by Mr. McIntosh, second by Mr. Andrejkovics, to deny the variance
allowing the creation of a 73.3 foot wide lot and a 68.3 foot wide lot for property located
at 300 S. Riverside Drive . The MOTION was APPROVED by the following vote:
Yes:Robert McIntosh, Pat Card, Robert Andrejkovics, David Tyree, and Michael Eichhorn5 -
No:George Kennedy1 -
Absent:Paul Wright1 -
6. OTHER BUSINESS
a.Recommendation to City Council for appointment due to the expired term of Pat
Card, who is seeing reappointment
A motion was made by Mr. McIntosh, second by Mr. Andrejkovics, to send a favorable
recommendation to City Council for the reappointment of Pat Card. The MOTION was
APPROVED by the following vote:
Yes:George Kennedy, Robert McIntosh, Pat Card, Robert Andrejkovics, David Tyree, and
Michael Eichhorn
6 -
Absent:Paul Wright1 -
7. DISCUSSION ITEMS
a. Development Services Director’s Report
Mr. Lear had nothing to report at this time.
b. Chairman's Report
Chairman Card had nothing to report at this time.
Page 3City of Edgewater Printed on 10/5/2016
September 14, 2016Planning and Zoning Board Meeting Minutes
c. Agency Members’ Report
Chairman Card discussed the previous quarterly report that was provided to the Board. He asked
how the projects west of I-95 were moving. Mr. Lear stated Restoration was waiting on their Army
Corps permit; Deering Park was still moving forward and there was a lot of interest in it. He added
that the Parktowne Boulevard extension would be complete soon as well as the Lineman's College.
Mr. Andrejkovics stated they plan to open on November 28. Mr. Lear further commented on the
status of Jiffy Lube and Florida Roadhouse.
Chairman Card thanked Mr. Lear for the information and complemented him on the ease of getting
additional information regarding agenda items.
Mr. Andrejkovics stated the Dougherty company was taking over the Corondo Paint facility. He
added that he was impressed that Edgewater has the largest industrial acreage in the County.
8. ADJOURN
There being nothing further to come before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 7:19 p.m.
Minutes respectfully submitted by:
Bonnie Brown
Senior Planner
Page 4City of Edgewater Printed on 10/5/2016
From:Peter Maman
To:Bonnie Brown
Subject:300 South Riverside
Date:Wednesday, September 14, 2016 2:12:16 PM
Planning and Zoning Board members,
My name is Pete Maman, I reside at 316 South Riverside Drive. I have lived at this address for 35 years. Please
excuse my absence this evening as my elderly mother was admitted to Florida Hospital New Smyrna this morning
in intensive care.
I am opposed to dividing the lot in question into two smaller lots. This would be inconsistent with the surrounding
neighborhood. Changing the established minimum lot size would set a precedent that would be detrimental to
surrounding homeowners. At the present time there is no driveway on Riverside Drive for this address. The
driveway is on East Palm Way. If the lot is allowed to be divided there would be no access to the southern lot
without adding a driveway on Riverside Drive. There is an existing dock at the address. Riparian rights and dock
permitting is also in question. Thank you for taking these concerns into consideration.
Sent from my iPhone