Preliminary Wetland & Threatened & Endangered Species Assessment - 11-27-06 RECEPVE
NOV 2
..k\7.\\• r 2OQ
'\ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN � 6
An 224 PARNELL STREET ,�,
MERRITT ISLAND, FLORIDA 32953
321-449-0408
Preliminary Wetland and Threatened and Endangered Species Assessment
Project Name: Edgewater Harbor Project No: EC04068
Work date: 11 June 2004
Site location: Section 38, Township 18 South, Range 35 East,
Volusia County, Florida
Objective of work: Environmental Services,Inc., (ESI)conducted a reli
p mmary wetland assessment
to locate the approximate limits of any areas of potential jurisdictional wetlands.
In addition, while traversing the site, evidence or the potential for the
presence/absence of threatened and/or endangered species was evaluated.
Site description: The site comprises a semi-rectangular tract of land consisting of
g approximately
60 acres in the northern portion of Section 38 of McHardy Grant, in Volusia
County,Florida(Figure 1).The property is bordered on the north by single-family
residences; on the west by U.S. Highway 1, beyond which is a single-family
residence and undeveloped land; on the south by the Boston Whaler Boat
Manufacturing Plant; and on the east by the Intercoastal Waterway of
y the Indian
River. Portions of the property currently comprise undeveloped, sparsely
vegetated natural communities, as well as portions that appear to have been
developed previously as an indefinable industrial land use.
Methodology: Wetland protection is mandated under both federal and state regulations. The
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (CE)regulates activities in Waters of the United
States pursuant to The Clean Water Act(PL92-500 Section 404) and as further
defined in the CE regulatory program (33 CFR 320-330). The State of Florida
Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has established wetland
identification and permitting processes in Chapters 62-330,62-340 and 62-312 of
the Florida Administrative Code (FAC). Current federal and state wetland
definitions are derived from the original definition found in 33 CFR 328.3,
identifying wetlands as"those areas that are inundated,or saturated by surface or
ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under
normal circumstances do support,a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for
life ��
ife in
saturated soil conditions." of federally regulated jurisdictional
wetlands is determined by the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual
(USAE Waterways Experiment Station Environmental Laboratory 1987).
Delineation of wetlands regulated by DEP and
Y St. Johns River Water
Management District (SJRWMD) is done according to Chapter 62-340 FAC,
1
Delineation of the Landward Extent of Wetlands and Surface Waters. The
Florida Wetlands Delineation Manual(Gilbert et al. 1995) serves as a guide to
Chapter 62-340. Both manuals, which emphasize the identification of hydric
soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrologic conditions in making
wetland determinations, were used in this investigation.
Soil Conservation Service (SCS) soils mapped as under-lying (Soil Survey of
Volusia County, Florida, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation
Service 1974) of the property were reviewed prior to the site visit to locate
potential wetland areas and to define typical vegetative communities. Site soils
were assessed for hydric indicators by excavating soil profiles and.examining
them for hydric indicators. ESI scientists assessed vegetation and hydrologic
conditions on the site by walking a series of pedestrian transects across the
property. Once a potential wetland area was identified,the extent of the wetland
area was mapped.
With regard to protected species, prior to review of the site, a list of federally
listed and state-listed plant and wildlife species potentially occurring in Brevard
County was developed. This list was then reviewed to identify the habitats used
by each species. During the site inspection, the various community types were
identified,dominant plant species were recorded, and assessments were made as
to the suitability of each community type to support listed species. Parameters
assessed to determine the potential suitability for a community to support listed
wildlife species included quality and availability of necessary components for
burrowing/nesting, foraging, and cover, including vegetation density and
distribution and presence and extent of disturbance to the habitat. In addition,
any evidence that might indicate use of the site by protected wildlife species was
rioied. Protected species surveys were completed in conformance with guidelines
established by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services (FWS), Florida Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC), and the Florida Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS). Community types and evidence
of protected species were recorded on an aerial photograph.
Field Review: On 11 June 2004 ESI biologists visited the site to gather data, document site
conditions,to determine the approximate extent of potential wetland areas,and/or
to identify potentially occurring threatened and endangered species.
Technical staff: Linda A. Olson, Vice President
Brian Powell, Senior Scientist
C.J. Greene, Project Scientist
Findings: SCS mapped soils underlying the property are Daytona sand,zero to five percent
slopes; Myakka fine sand; Orsino fine sand, zero to five percent slopes;
Pompano-Placid complex; Tavares fine sand, zero to five percent slopes; and
Quartzipsamments, gently sloping(Figure 2). According to the Hydric Soils of
Florida Handbook(Florida Association of Environmental Soil Scientist 2000),
Myakka sand is considered non-hydric 85 percent of the time and hydric 15
2
percent of the time while Pompano-Placid complex is hydric 80 percent of the
time. The remainder of the mapped soils are not listed in the Hydric Soils of
Florida Handbook. In general,review of the soils on site suggests that the SCS
mapped soils are consistent with the soils observed except for the northeastern
and southern portions of the property. Soils observed within the northeastern
corner of the property are characterized by a fine, silty texture and have a high
organic content and were saturated. The soil in three isolated areas within the
north central portion of the property is black in color, mucky in texture, and
saturated. All of these characteristics are indicative of hydric soils,which varies
from their SCS mapping of Daytona sand,zero to five percent slopes;Orsino fine
sand, zero to five percent slopes; Tavares fine sand, zero to five percent slopes;
and Quartzipsamments, gently sloping.
The majority of the southern portion of the property contains soils that appear to
have been severely disturbed as the result of previous excavations. The soils in
this area are very coarse and comprise large shell-like material,inconsistent with
the mapping of Daytona sand,zero to five percent slopes; Orsino fine sand,zero
to five percent slopes; Tavares fine sand, zero to five percent slopes; and
Quartzipsamments,gently sloping in this area. Soils within the remainder of the
property was characterized as being light to medium grey in color,fine in texture,
and dry, all characteristics consistent with the SCS-mapped soils.
Hydrologic indicators observed on the property include high water marks,
drainage patterns, buttressed tree bases, and mucky soils. These hydrologic
indicators were observed in the areas where hydric soils also were identified.
Using the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System Handbook
(FLUCFCS)(Florida Department of Transportation 1999)as a guideline,we have
determined the property comprises eight landuses or community types: Sand and
Gravel Pits (FLUCFCS 162), Undeveloped Land Within Urban Areas
(FLUCFCS-191),Pine Flatwoods(FLUCFCS-411),Xeric Oak(FLUCFCS-421),
Cabbage Palm (FLUCFCS-428), Reservoirs Less Than Ten Acres (FLUCFCS-
534), Mixed Wetland Hardwoods (FLUCFCS-617), and Tidal Marsh
(FLUCFCS-651).
The Sand and Gravel Pits land use type on the site consists of 18.5 acres and
comprises a large portion of the center of the property. This area appears to be
the result of excavation and off-site transport of fill material. The man-made
nature of the Sand and Gravel Pits land use type was evident during the site
inspection by the topographic relief of the property,which consisted of one to one
slope ratios with elevation differences of up to six to eight feet. Dominant
vegetation within this land use area consists of cattails(Typha latifolia),primrose
willow (Ludwigia peruviana), torpedo grass (Panicum repens), and milk pea
(Galactia regularis). The vegetation present represents hydrophytic vegetation;
i.e., typical of vegetation found within areas that are classified as jurisdictional
wetlands. However,the Sand and Gravel Pits land use areas were not,classified
3
as jurisdictional wetlands as they did not contain any hydrologic indicators or
hydric soils, two characteristics that should be present for an area to be
considered wetlands.
Undeveloped Land Within Urban Areas comprises the majority of the property as
it consists of approximately 23 acres along the western, southern, and eastern
portions of the property. This portion of the property has been cleared of its
natural vegetation and consists of vacant buildings and open fields,which appear
to have been used as storage areas for an indefinable industrial land use.
Vegetation remaining in this area comprises of ragweed (Ambrosia
artemiisifolia), dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), bahiagrass (Paspalum
notatum), and passion vine (Chamaecrista fasciculata).
The Pine Flatwoods community consists of approximately 7.3 acres in the
northwestern portion of the property and predominantly contains a canopy of
slash pine (Pinus elliottii); a subcanopy of saw palmetto (Serenoa repens),
smaller canopy species, and scattered sand live oak(Quercus geminata); and a
ground cover of bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), southern fox grape (Vitis
rotundfolia), blackberry (Rubus betulifolius), and leaf litter three to six inches
deep.
The Xeric Oak community comprises a canopy of scrub oak and a subcanopy
dominated by saw palmetto. Ground cover species include blazing star(Liatris
spicata), wiregrass (Aristida stricta), and southern fox grape. The Xeric Oak
community is located within the northcentral portion of the property and consists
of approximately 4.5 acres.
A small portion of the northeastern corner of the property is classified as Cabbage
Palm and consists of approximately 4.8 acres. The canopy is dominated by
cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), live oak (Quercus virginiana), and pignut
hickory(Carya glabra). The canopy coverage is extremely dense,and;allows for
very little light penetration,which results in the growth of little to no subcanopy
or groundcover vegetation. The perimeter of the Cabbage Palm community is
dominated by southern fox grape.
The site inspection revealed the presence of three separate areas that are classified
as Reservoirs Less Than Ten Acres.These reservoirs appear to be man made and
contain hydrophytic vegetation. The dominant vegetative composition of these
areas is sand cordgrass (Spartinia bakeri),pennywort(Hydrocotyle umbellata),
and torpedo grass. All three of these areas will be classified as surface waters and
will be claimed as jurisdictional by SJRWMD only. Two of the three surface
water bodies are located within the northernmost Sand and Gravel Pits land use
area. Both of these water bodies are dominated by a canopy of Carolina willow
around the perimeter. Each of these areas is approximately 0.20 acre in size. The
third surface water is located in the northwestern corner of the property and
consists of approximately 0.30 acres. This surface water appears to have been
4
constructed to serve the historical land use as a stormwater treatment facility,as it
has a control structure that discharges treated water into the Indian River.
The on-site Mixed Wetland Hardwoods community consists of approximately 4.8
acres and lies within the northcentral portion of the property. The canopy is
dominated by red maple(Acer rubrum),hackberry(Celtis laevigata), and laurel
oak(Quercus laurifolia). The subcanopy is dominated by small cabbage palms,
shiny fetterbush (Lyonia lucida), and less than 10 percent Brazilian pepper
(Schinus terebinthifolius), a nuisance/exotic species. Groundcover vegetation is
dominated by royal fern (Osmunda regalis) and cinnamon fern (Osmunda
cinnamomea). The entire perimeter of the Mixed Wetland Hardwoods
community was delineated in the field and evaluated for al connection to any off-
site wetland areas or waters of the U.S. The site inspection revealed that the
Mixed Wetland Hardwoods community is isolated and there
. Y is no hydrologic
connection to any other jurisdictional wetlands. A review of the Volusia County
Soil Survey indicated that the on-site Mixed Wetland Hardwoods community
historically was part of a large slough system or stream that extended off-site to
the north and south. It appears that as a result of on-site, as well as off-site
development, the historic connection of on-site wetland area was severed from
off-site wetlands. The isolated nature of the wetland system suggests that the
Mixed Wetland
Hardwoods community will be claimed as jurisdictional by
SJRWMD only. During the site inspection we observed evidence that the
hydrology of the on-site system had been negatively impacted as a result of its
severance from other wetlands. This was exhibited by the presence of significant
soil subsidence (greater than six inches). The presence of soil subsidence
suggests that the hydroperiod of the Mixed Wetland Hardwood system has been
reduced. The reduction u eduction to the hydroperiod of the system and the presence of
Brazilian pepper have degraded the quality of the Mixed Wetland Hardwoods
community to a low to moderately low quality.
The extreme northeastern corner of the property is classified as a Tidal Marsh
community and consists of approximately 0.5 acre. The dominant vegetation
within the Tidal Marsh community consists of red mangrove (Rhizophora
mangle),black mangrove(Avicennia germinans),and sand cordgrass. The entire
upland/wetland interface of the Tidal Marsh community was delineated in the
field and evaluated for a connection to any off-site wetland areas or waters of the
U.S. The on-site Tidal Marsh is directly connected to the Indian River,which is
directly adjacent to the eastern property boundary. As such, the on-site Tidal
Marsh community will be claimed as jurisdictional wetlands by CE and
SJRWMD. The quality of the Tidal Marsh community was assessed to be high as
there is little to no nuisance/exotic vegetation present and the hydrologic
connection to the Indian River has been maintained.
Based on our review of the soils, hydrology, and vegetation, we determined that
the Mixed Wetland Hardwoods and Tidal Marsh communities will be considered
to be jurisdictional wetlands. The Mixed Wetland Hardwoods community will be
5
jurisdictional to SJRWMD only as it is isolated and not within 200 feet of or
connected to any water of the United States. The Tidal Marsh community is
directly connected to waters of the United States and; therefore, will be
considered as jurisdictional by CE and SJRWMD.
Additionally,there are three surface waters on the property. Two of the ponds are
located in the center of the property within the Sand and Gravel Pits areas. The
third surface water is in the northeastern corner of the property and is bordered by
the on-site Tidal Marsh community on the east. This pond is equipped with a
water level control structure, which discharges any overflow into the Indian
River. However, the three on-site surface water bodies appear to have been
constructed within upland p areas, and possibly for stormwater control and
treatment;therefore,they should be considered jurisdictional by SJRWMD only.
Permits authorizing impacts to the on-site surface waters and the Mixed Wetland
Hardwoods community will need to be obtained from SJRWMD only. Any
proposed impacts to the Tidal Marsh will require permits from both CE and
SJRWMD, as it is connected directly to the Indian River.
It is anticipated that if impacts are proposed to the Mixed Wetland Hardwoods
and/or Tidal Marsh communities, some type of mitigation will be required. A
review of the SJRWMD Watershed Basin Map revealed that the project area is
within Basin 21, which is outside of the service areas of all currently permitted
mitigation banks. Therefore,mitigation for any proposed wetland impacts would
have to be provided for onsite or through the purchase of off-site property.
To prevent secondary impacts from occurring to any preserved wetlands that may
be left on site, it will be necessary to maintain an average 25-foot buffer around
the preserved wetlands.
With regard to listed species, the survey of the Edgewater Harbor project site
resulted in the determination that the site provides potentially suitable habitat for
two listed wildlife species: gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus); eastern
indigo snake (Drymarchon corai cou eris • and
two listed plant)� pant species: royal
fern (Osmunda regalis); cinnamon fern(Osmunda cinnamomea).
It was determined,based on the site inspection,that the Pine Flatwoods and Xeric
Oak communities within the project site provide suitable conditions and habitat
(well-drained loose soil in which to burrow, adequate low-growing herbs for
food, and open sunlit sites for nesting)for gopher tortoises, a state listed species
of special concern. During the survey,ESI confirmed the presence of a resident
gopher tortoise population through the observation of two active burrows on the
project site.
In reference to gopher tortoises,several options are available to individuals who
wish to conduct activities that may"take"tortoises. These include avoidance of
6
gopher tortoise burrows, preservation of an occupied area on-site, donation of
monies to a mitigation fund,purchase and preservation of other suitable occupied
natural areas, and on-site and off-site relocation.
The eastern indigo snake, both federally and state-listed as Threatened, is a
species that can be found within a wide variety of communities, occasionally
utilizing gopher tortoise burrows where habitat use coincides. No indigo snakes
were sighted on the study area during the course of the survey; however, they
have a moderate potential to occur on the study area, due to the relatively large
size of the property and the presence of gopher tortoises. If present, eastern
indigo snake can be mitigated for in conjunction with gopher tortoises.
Cinnamon fern and royal fern,both state-regulated as Commercially Exploited,
are known to occur in moist to wet woods, shallow swamps and ponds, and
hydric hammocks. Both ferns were observed in the wetland community onsite.
Impacts to these protected plant species will require permits only for their off-site
transport and sale.
It is ESI's recommendation that a comprehensive survey of the property be
conducted to confirm the location and extent of the on-site gopher tortoise
population. At the request of the property owner, ESI can provide a proposal,
which will cover a comprehensive gopher tortoise survey and the preparation of a
brief report summarizing the results of the survey and permitting options
necessary to resolve on-site gopher tortoise issues.
Figures: Figure 1 -Location Map
Figure 2 - Soils Map
Figure 3 —Habitat Type Map
References: Florida Association of Environmental Soil Scientists. 2000. Hydric Soils of
Florida Handbook. Gainesville,Florida. 319pp.
Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. 2004. Florida's
endangered species,threatened species and species of special concern,official
lists. Tallahassee, Florida. 16 pp.
Florida Department of Transportation, State Topographic Bureau, Thematic
Mapping Section. 1999. Florida land use, cover and forms classification
system handbook (FLUCFCS). Tallahassee, Florida. 91pp.
Gilbert, K., J. Tobe, R., Cantrell, M. Sweeny and J. Cooper. 1995. The
Florida Wetlands Delineation Manual. The Florida Department of
Environmental Protection, South Florida Water Management District, St.
Johns River Water Management District, Suwanee River Water Management
District, and d Northwest Florida Water Management g District. 197p.
7
Moler, Paul E., ed. 1992. Amphibians and Reptiles. Vol. III of Rare and
endangered biota of Florida. R.E. Ashton, Jr., ed. Gainesville: University
Presses of Florida.
U. S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1974. Soil
Survey of Brevard County, Florida. 123 p. +maps.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. [Updated list of federally
listed endangered and threatened species]. Washington, D.C.
USAE Waterways Experiment Station Environmental Laboratory. 1987.
Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual,Technical Report Y-87-1,
US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station,Vicksburg,Mississippi.
This is an opinion report by Environmental Services,Inc. Our opinions are based upon our professional experience and are interpretations of
the jurisdiction and subsequent implications of the referenced regulatory agency. Our findings are subject to modification upon review by
regulatory agencies,and we recommend agency review of our work. This report is confidential between Environmental Services,Inc.,and the
addressee. It is not intended to be used with any submittal to any regulatory agency. Should permits be required for work within jurisdictional
areas,Environmental Services,Inc.,should participate in the permit application preparation and agency coordination. If necessary,a separate
opinion letter will be prepared for submittal with the permit application.
R:\Job Files\2004 Jobs\04068-Edgewater Harbor\04068.00-prelim&seagrass\edgewaterharbor-short report.doc
8
. _
oW W D `', 1 ! ��'''`'•'�)r :00- -___ .. i -_.-..._ `, ``.. • ti, )`{-j ai/'
Q.
m
m_�' m- g i o O X '=' ss.o .� •• i p•• --cis-A. �, 1i'u �.• .;t .iy1 .P
h7 z o g �p� �A� . , _ 1 1.�` 3 ,.', '•/ �v a. ,•r ye• ,",
PI $o are'rcn g .`. p ,• m fJ F4 .l ; ' .,sr,�,_
to m o �� - Ir / f "''�sYx 6 r.a ' ..,rc / �-
C/1Z m� -I 1 _ ;II -x,` .-°CL... r a., , ^Ly'
•
L to g 2 ° �%-� r 7 v1 /_�� / ! �v s, , �"•
Fj =0, . .�o3 75 O , \ ,-- .��Lral{ � s jl '^s1 'y�y i f'-•y.,'.
3 m w 3 8 1� .\ \ \ psr ' / ' �� ".-^ '_' .a ,,-r Z''•.,, e rti ,:- tY r A a '1
(7 1.m ` t••1`a �/ , r ± & ± 1
.. °-' .!wa m •'r.�2 s' l.. t7 m m m m / : �-1 '1 N o A °'m i '�� I.0 j�/• jz �, ,�*'S$4 q.�+r -e't' -N n'L",
1. __ s� n.!Gx. r i -s "°' ?. \: ��,. ,ado` feT�a' •.7
=. J Sa'2q.t `- 2 � r` ' - V N£a r r 1 f r^c'w2' .c.'?a M ! j - ./4� r
"ter -�z,. a� 0.--:--' h ' +' a ,''r'4 r ,,,r;, r 4�r ,- t. ti� ,1 • a .14'
N :*' '!' `r, a.0D --- •'" ;,.r?„ai't 1i•`` 04,--,..0:•/441,,,+ ��'� .G .�. ,.:- «4, L. ,� .✓ �. j• 1 �a'a'.if 'C.
r .,,, 1..i,..., - d % *`;.'�,.�.,- �:yr r .. '�1. "'" 4I G{.:::ml
_ a G -x. - f. ! ae� , ..' L° ':
� :� emu •r— �'3 a j 'y-`... .5t,,C,'; 1 T J r \- �. � Jas"" 41" `-•O /ry:'� s rte-•• 7•j ',.. i• r .! + -.fl ?tit2 ti• 4.:1: -.:A;-.1.4
•t ,�.� :;�✓': .�. .��! �S' -Y:-- - 4---;•+,1 . t�Y1yw- L f ,., .4 -
O m a, p- r r .,tc <' :h ,,: .c �Z ,,,i' sue' r C4,' ,r
.�- �
/.� �: .., 1 rf• '""'. "0.-:.:M.,, Z a e'tia' , �'•a. t o t";-o 1-.1:N-�t .., '' „, i r•
i . D _ _�-,�/N >GPti f �- ;9}-7„T' Ir""`�.:h .+ � ,�']" t"A 7,v, tl rte',;✓..Y.ria .'L'�.. '�4,,�i' F. `«5 �`> i! ,.e;j.
�I/A� p ,` 'a s ' f: a..!•.161:9‘ rye GS _..G,1 `-;),,,''' .... ,✓�' '' ff' ar. S'e�,m 1'r'. !q .
�Hi . D r " ,^' r ' , " rX✓ W 4-0 Y v O. .tea,„ x,,:-.,:x1'5, 3 , N,�•� :::"--.2=4.),:1,-,-.rC y„'_ ,4:15 ." �. � 3 .''`vr-4. "''S.:( a. a3' /l7tY sr'' f °.f a; '•
A yr nL , w T":9 v -*--7-.,, P � i:-=-1
• 3 X'° d" �fY"' s. 'r•1-.r�•r.t. - a V X16.' i s :✓ .. fir+. V,',17..--210,.--'..._.� - ♦ ° 7 f'\ Y •u.of.' 2ai.YAK l'- L l�"'j .s,.
— 4 gat , •s-- a. v -'S'n• n ''.13,`,.1-. t.s. ""'+1� 1, tr Y? .'. 1-r G . '�S ./i`/-1,-,51-- r r ,. / a
=< _ P.1.0.14':-' : "0 .T.•`.: C" --`�'Y^.'t--'-,':-" :"•,.,• gt, .,1'S . ?", r. -�s dl �r'>4°.. -.CC, "].'e ,rr.:c,c ,,,4i. ...-t..r ^, {J;, .,:.3' rn 'r,{' _
kao 3 eB�i .D +'e"L. v f':,. 2";. w :;u'/ A. },I. .n, ,, , G"+4 '!e". O.,'t,,.3..+-,h' ,• ,r. 'T I i'.•1 y y .-.F.,-4,-' ..:%,- ,.��7• 1 .•,r�
3 .�` a L- I; +? �.,a �� xy,a ,d �" '�-K.�.{� •aE� a'+JIr'uy �j E a�:,rzi t: ,c"+,4 4;g.i � 1 i'�.
�' O �,i `G Yl'? a Z,7 . -",„,;,----Z:� _"'F• �I. M_°+ ;......- f ,«,,, i' % ,``'vi �4r, tf�2,,J"✓' +N '': -�..,,,47, ,,,k,,,rit I, ter "
'" .fa o.,r ca s. u sC^ t";":.� f b, ..1 W.. - �.,z, . "�^.•a x,,,r,„, :f.`aS r i t". ¢T } d.4 v �` .F ..-, I 1.: L5i.t.•�„
Y, d, O r, -•' r �. r '� .P'm L `acs �'�...'•*J - ' t" 1.ca 1°; C -4.2 S:• 3 1 }"'� ',:s a a. a 1.-1,--t�``^., d.,4' '-n x.2 , i r....',./.^` x
sl) µL 3; R r -a,. 4. . -tie r ,
a ,;
f �+ y
a r r
}
-��`1 -.- lr 5 I rl�'y?-S" F4r1 ..." a'I"'L'u.�.a f't� •�.a
6 S � ^J.
�. , ac i; ..jrlti9.. - Iai�tU ,yi,.,,;.,...-414, .«,� ail °',-� /.'t �r.t° �. .; ��•ga _ e a '� ,./...,..„,...4..,
-'p i. :''c' 2111 V1, 4c .= 1 , ,-1 L L+ ;
,r m,'T 3 u t1a_.-,•. 71:r • ni"re x,'r Y, t s,Ts- III,__ .fir. i` 4 !* �1 .a -.-`s."s ,
'?i �' , 3c z 1 • �ti,;9`' ; `w�° '0.'"G' ...: � F'. 2 :-- v, t
y .,ten"'' r / s0Aett.4.s r.-r P a4..k I 1 tom ", e3 ? 1 "Y -^,» "`.°' m
t1 r 1' `. t --T' ".....'1%'-'-,f ra.�,1 1 r .�C i,8 ! t` 7 ° rf.
0 •1 -n 1► A t. , -1 r r 4. -. 1,4 "s4 a C °s' b " F. p s� /-1,""`er . P,�i'
CO -' tQ J� fNI e Q 1 ' a S �,� r;,�
��r "r 2s •fD (D ,1",;24.1„: =1,.:-. 7 «e 1r ���
J ,
o,ArJil4) `� G t ti 1 Fr T± y ,.;,,,,:,:).2r
. — 1
\Q a ;5./,6";.•''' J z. ,i •1 .a a/31'''. r f/W A
CIll L 1 �4 .7 ,!s,� Sv37 t.��;;..A.,;4?,.;;; ' ,,%s'" ie� %..fly' '
ODD 1
i
M _. �s - 'w r '` art � ;,�. ; Z;„, ` 1r4, t'\ ' x.s\ � m"� �!{ �_ M —' . 6�
‘to
1 ,., \ -,.. --, .,, ,-,, ‘;,8,,„:.,,v1-,,....,. :,:.: lq:A..p,r:,*kwf-4pfiff.-Rwtz,-„,i,,-,.,,,.,:-.2 k., --...r., \-. k :, :, .7: - -
, ..., ..... __ .... .., „,..,,, ....:,..,...., .,.:-#1,4N* .',--7....'— '-0-1-;";;S:::',,,,...%''''ttYt..:',- : '''.-'-f- '" ,/ — ''',- '''''''-' : ;-"'
4:,(
.‘ , , •ss.„,-;—__• , c• , .....„,..,_ ...,,, ,,, -,_ , ,, ,v �' °�` ' � `t ' -V .*'`` Property. , ,‘ ,,,.. , ... ....... .. ... .
.. „_ , .,,, z ,
, t f }
�'•.. • i�.`1 l., t� l �•rl 1 `. .�``'.- r k1.f S, 4--W r t,„,W„4S{1 f 3"� � Y • .
{ i � 3 ',�y .y
r..4-,,,'..,t.,....',--.. _ ._ i-
V \ !' -1
i /
'-L by + \ sI: t 1 '"I''''''''','1'—i \it
Et `YS,.. � ;.¢i 1� ��.. \\1,, >C. �4 _t �. r. 13�5s ._ }�v , 4
t. l l� } t k�� �'4�µ��'� .1 '.�
c 3 \,i k t +x _
(t .,, t r M _ ni �!�
•
5
l\ 'i 1 t
t ' t
''
,.•i to .�,t \'. 4 t .£ � 1,-'11'.-1',
# ; `�a»+# `°� l +
a
+ t i . i
d r '
.i „,,,,....,1:- .. ,tY ` t i {" . k � o�� I 3 Lf l ) A > 4`- t �( f A
Legend: Approximate Property Boundary 0 833.5 1ss71 Feet
w
17 Daytona Sand,Zero to Five Percent Slopes o. 5 0.50 Km "14�yi?r�swa
•
32 Myakka Fine Sand ' ` Source' USDA Soil Conservation Service �4�{�
Soil Survey of Volusia County, Florida (1980) ,I 'err:
37 Orsino Fine Sand,Zero to Five Percent Slopes sheet 79 �7,
53 Pampano,Placid Complex „ Section 50 Township 18 South Range 34 East i' 'agAs
54 Quartzipsamments,Gently Sloping Note: Property boundary •i�
p y ry information was taken
63 es from a 15 April2002 Boundary Survey provided
3 Tavares Fine Sand,Zero to Five Percent Slo
p i to ESI by Upham,Inc.
�\ Soils Map Figure: 2
�l�/ ENVIRONMENTAL Edgewater Harbor Project: EC04068
SERVICES, INC. Volusia County, Florida
®"i"s' Date: June 2004
1